Robohelp vs. FrameMaker
Hello,
I have a few large scale RoboHelp 6 projects. I am debating whether to upgrade to RoboHelp 9 or to convert my projects to FrameMaker (to which I have an existing license). My projects' main purpose is an online tutorial (HTML), but I will also need chms and pdfs. My questions are:
1) Is there a reason to prefer RoboHelp 9 over FrameMaker in my case?
2) How difficult will migration be from RoboHelp 6 to FrameMaker? Or to RoboHelp 9?
Thanks in advance
Most people are doing the TCS integration of FM to RH because FM can create better looking PDFs than RH (especially if your docs are long). However, many people do all their authoring in RH and then use the Printed Documentation SSL to get their PDFs via Word. Upgrading a project from RH6 to RH9 will probably go smoothly, but make sure you have a backup before you begin. You may experience difficulties with numbered/ordered lists and the change to XHTML in RH8+. There is no clear path from RH to FM. You will have to cut & paste or export to Word & re-import into FM to get content over.
Similar Messages
-
RoboHelp for FrameMaker and FrameMaker 8
I still use the legendary, yet discontinued and unsupported, "RoboHelp for FrameMaker". However, when I installed my new Tech Comm Suite and FM 8. RoboHelp for FrameMaker would not work with FM 8. I know this is a long shot, but does anyone know a workaround to get the defunct RoboHelp for FrameMaker to work with FrameMaker 8? Please do not suggest using RoboHelp to convert the files. That engine is terrible. Also, RoboHelp for FrameMaker, four years later, is still better than mif2go and ePublisher by Webworks.
Mark,
I meant RH for FrameMaker, and ..
"... RH for FM uses skins, it creates a web help system with a collapsible/expandable TOC, integrated client-side search engine, a better interface for mapping of styles and including or excluding conditional text, and it publishes to a web server. There are many other features."
You can easily substitute RH for FM with ePublisher and add quite a bit more. Since ePublisher to a great extend relies on XML there are so many other cool things you can do.
I am NOT saying it is easier, just that I like it more, and that it supports all of FM's features (incl. 8). The jobs I'm doing at the moment in ePublsher cannot yet be made by RH for FM. (Also I'm integrating both FM and Word and some xMetal XML output into the same help system!
But again it's a matter of opinion. And what you need to accomplish
In a recent seminar by RJ Jacquez from Adobe he admitted that the Tech Com Suite (and RH for FM) was an entry to the market and that they had some way to go yet for RH to 'compete' with ePublisher.
On the price side I quite agree. WebWorks has some pretty steep prices. Which at the same are completely and utterly impossible to understand. I have been given threee different prices for the same solution! Just to mention.
keep smiling
thomas -
RoboHelp for FrameMaker requirements
I have v1.1 of RoboHelp for FrameMaker and v7.2 FrameMaker.
RoboHelp complains that FrameMaker is not installed. Is v7.2 not
supported? Is there a way I can fool RoboHelp into using it anyway
(filename changes, etc.)?As far as I know, RHF doesn't support FrameMaker 7.2, as 7.2
came out significantly after RHF. It seems to recognize FrameMaker
7.1, but has problems with more recent versions of Distiller that
ship with more recent versions of FrameMaker. I'd suspect that
Frame 7.0p578 would be the best option for withing with RHF.
However, you CAN have multiple versions of FrameMaker on the
same system. So you could have Frame 7.0 (for use with RHF) and
Frame 7.2 for other projects on the same system. Save your
FrameMaker files as MIF files for maximum portability across
different versions.
The sticking point will be Distiller - multiple versions of
Distiller on a system can cause all sorts of issues. -
Robohelp 6, Framemaker and WebWorks integration?
I'm responsible for technical documentation at my company.
Yesterday I received an email about Robohelp 6, and decided to
check it out.
I've used Robohelp before and quite liked it. It's very
useful if you have an existing documentation base in Microsoft
Word; owever nearly all the companies I've worked at that have a
substantial documentation base use Framemaker and not Word as their
standard documentation platform, for a wide variety of reasons.
So, I'm a little disappointed to notice that Robohelp 6
really can't be used practically with Framemaker. Sure, I can
translate all my files to MIF and import them, but then this forces
me to go ahead and translate a lot of documentation manually (the
functionality to do a batch format conversion just doesn't exist).
It also forces me to keep two sets of documents (you can't generate
TOCs or IXs from MIF files apparently). That's just not acceptable
considering that the same company makes both applications.
Evidently RH6 isn't even able to use Framemaker to translate
documents on the fly the way that a third-party application like
WebWorks is able to do.
Seriously, I can't even say that the products are poorly
integrated, because they're evidently not integrated in any way.
This wouldn't be so bad if Frame 7.2 included the decent
version of WebWorks that used to be included with Frame 6.x,
or was even compatible with that version! But it's not. You
can't use Frame 7.2 with WebWorks. You're stuck with using
ePublisher, which isn't even close to an acceptable replacement as
it's a huge downgrade from the previous bundled app.
So, another online help solution is a dire necessity here,
and Adobe, despite owning both the Robohelp and Framemaker, is
either unable or unwilling to make both work together for a reason
which really escapes me. The one FAQ entry on the subject is beyond
vague and noncommittal and smacks of a half-answer designed to
"stop the technical writers whining about this".
Additionally, considering that Adobe itself is still to this
day bundling Quadralay products with Framemaker, wouldn't it be the
logically expected thing for Robohelp to be able to import WebWorks
and ePublisher projects, at least in part? Yet I don't see any way
in which this can be done.
Robohelp 6 is not a cheap product. At a grand a seat, it
costs more than Photoshop, despite being a much simpler product
(certainly in technical terms). I'd LOVE to be able to recommend
that my company buy a few licenses, but this is really not
something that I can do at this time, nor do I foresee a time when
I'll be able to do so unfortunately.
What can I, as a senior technical writer, expect Adobe to do
to resolve what I see as a serious impasse here?Hi, tonyemond and welcome to the pond
You may not be aware, but Adobe only recently (within the
last year or so) acquired RoboHelp in the Macromedia deal. I can
understand your frustration and many of the issues you raise are
being addressed in the next version of RoboHelp which is being
developed as we "speak". In fact, it is so far along that you are
invited to join the Adobe RoboHelp pre-release (beta) program for
the next version.
You can find details here.
Adobe
Technical Communications Blog
I got to attend the sneak peek sessions at STC in Minneapolis
last month where Adobe showed many new features. As you may know,
there is a new version of Framemaker in beta as well (and Adobe
Captivate, too!). So, it takes a while to integrate these
leap-frogging targets. The wait will be rewarded however.
Enjoy!
john -
Revive RoboHelp for FrameMaker
I am interested in knowing how many people out there remember
RoboHelp for FrameMaker (RHF) and how many are interested in
reviving it. It was an excellent, easy-to-use extension of RoboHelp
that made it really easy to publish FrameMaker in a number of
on-line help formats. It was abruptly forced to EOL when Macromedia
bought eHelp. Its users/supporters made a valiant effort to save
it, but it was so new there wasn't a huge user base yet and it
never got the chance to develop the following it would have. It was
the easiest way to create full-featured on-line help systems that
has yet been devised, and I would like to open a dialog about
reviving it.
Now that Adobe Systems has acquired Macromedia, it makes
sense to revisit the issue of reviving RHF.
If you are interested at all, please forward this information
to other FrameMaker users.
Thanks.
[email protected]I would be very interested in seeing RoboHelp for FrameMaker
revived. I have been trying to use RoboHelp Office X5 with my
FrameMaker user guide for weeks and have run in to nothing but
problems. I've tried importing the .mif files, but it's
inconsistent and doesn't allow me to update the graphics. I've also
tried RoboHelp's other suggestion which is converting the
FrameMaker documents to Word documents first. I was surprised that
they are encouraging use of a competitor's software (if I just
write in Word I skip a step). I'm also surprised they know their
software so little. FrameMaker has never converted to Word well and
usually blows up somewhere in the process. I've also tried finding
answers to my FrameMaker/RoboHelp questions in forums, but it seems
that there aren't too many people trying this because I haven't
found or received any answers to my questions and have hardly found
anything relating to .mif and RoboHelp.
Sorry for the rant, but I have just been very disappointed in
this process when it used to be so easy to create and maintain
online help using FrameMaker documents. -
Hi All,
We are trying to do the following :
- Create a Frame maker Book with a couple of chapters & TOC
- Import the Book into RoboHelp
- Save the document in RoboHelp to PDF, WebHTML & EPUB
- The output files are created but we do not see the content as expected.
Platform/Tools - Windows XP , Framemaker 10 , Robhelp 9
Issues :
PDF - The Chapters are ordered in the alphabetical sequence rather than the Chapter/Page sequence set by using the Numbering option for Chapter/Page - "Continue numbering from previous page in book".
WebHTML - The TOC does on the left frame/pane does not show the list of chapters
- The Chapters are ordered as per the alphabetical numbering ( Chapters begining with Numbers then alphabets etc.) rather than the order seen in Framemaker
EPUB - The TOC shows the numbers which are again ordered in alphabetical order but not reflecting the actual order of the chapters seen in framemaker.
- The Chapters are ordered as per the alphabetical numbering ( Chapters begining with Numbers then alphabets etc.) rather than the order seen in Framemaker
Could the folks are experienced with document publishing using Framemaker guide appropriately.
Thanks in AdvanceOk, wrong forum - you should be in the FrameMaker Integration thread in the RH forum, but no matter.
Trying to create PDF output out of RH will drive you crazy since you have to go through Word to get to PDF. Much better to go to PDF straight from your FM source book. This is one of FM's strengths - it's not one of RH's.
Since all your issues seem to stem from your ToC, I would recommend messing around with it in FM to get it looking correct. Then import the content & ToC into RH. The "Edit FM documents" button in the Conversion Settings dialog allows you to bring over your FM ToC into RH; they also control how content will appear and how topics are to be created (pagination).
If, after importing, your ToC in RH isn't what you want it to look like, just edit it within RH - since you're importing FM content (not linking) each time you import it's a fresh start (and new project). You can easily move stuff around in a RH ToC. -
TCS 5 RoboHelp and FrameMaker links work and then stop
Hi,
I installed TCS 5 after installing a trial of RoboHelp 11. After I installed, I opened a project from TCS 4 and I was able to update an existing linked FM book and Link to new files. The FM files were converted ot FM 12 and the RoboHelp project was converted to RoboHelp 11.
Now, when I reopen the RoboHelp project, I cannot update or link to FrameMaker documents.
I am running Windows 7. I run both RH and FM as administrator and I have owner permissions to the Adobe folder.
I tried uninstalling and reinstalling TCS 5 and the behavior is consistent. Is there some registry entry or something i should look for?
LaurenFirst my client, then I saw the exact same thing.
One day the project worked perfectly, then the next day the linking options were all unavailable. It's as if Rh decided it was no longer associating with Fm.
Oddly, another client team member was unaffected.
I'm trying to track down the issue. Did you resolve the linking problem? -
Can't link Robohelp to FrameMaker
FrameMaker 10
Robohelp 9
Windows 7
Robohelp project can link to Word files but FrameMaker is grayed out. What am I doing wrong? I am recently re-aquainting myself with FrameMaker and building a proposal to implement it in my company.
Please advise a former power user now a newbie. ;-)
Thanks!Nope, just having the component parts of the suite doesn't equal having the suite. There's a little linking part that gets included with the suite download that makes RH show up on the FM menu and FM show up on the linking menu in RH. (plus, the price of the suite is cheaper than having the individual parts)
-
Hello,
I'm aware that RH for FrameMaker was discontinued a few years
ago, but we're considering using it as we have no desire to use
Quadralay ePublisher (a huge step back from WebWorks). Are there
any resellers in the U.S.? I'm only aware of the UK reseller
www.power2comm.com. Also, we use Frame 7.1 and we're wondering if
there will be incompatibilities with RH for Frame.
Thanks in advance!!!As far as I know, RHF doesn't support FrameMaker 7.2, as 7.2
came out significantly after RHF. It seems to recognize FrameMaker
7.1, but has problems with more recent versions of Distiller that
ship with more recent versions of FrameMaker. I'd suspect that
Frame 7.0p578 would be the best option for withing with RHF.
However, you CAN have multiple versions of FrameMaker on the
same system. So you could have Frame 7.0 (for use with RHF) and
Frame 7.2 for other projects on the same system. Save your
FrameMaker files as MIF files for maximum portability across
different versions.
The sticking point will be Distiller - multiple versions of
Distiller on a system can cause all sorts of issues. -
Why Doesn't Robohelp 8 Allow Linking of FrameMaker 9 Docs?
Softwares:
RoboHelp 8
FrameMaker 9
Context Sensitive Help for HTML
My counterpart in Japan is making HTML Help. I have supplied him with our procedures for completing this task, which includes linking (not importing) FrameMaker docs. He tells me that this is not an option for him. The only files he's able to link are Word documents, and that the FrameMaker option is either greyed out or not there (not sure which one). Therefore, he has no choice but to import the FrameMaker files.
We're having these discussions because he can't get pagination to work. So is there any chance that not being able to link FrameMaker documents has anything to do with his pagination problems?
Thanks!Yes, that's what I mean - you're ok; they're not, because they're missing the integration provided by the TCS.
I remember somebody asking RJ Jacques during his FM to RH webinar if you could do linking with the individual products - "no go," he replied.
Importing works fine (although some weird stuff can pop up if your FM docs consist of a book of books).
Jeff -
Hello,
I've been asked to look into the possibility of switching our
help system software from RoboHelp to FrameMaker, primarily due to
the fact that the primary business unit in the company uses FM, and
this would facilitate the need for them to integrate elements of
our help file into theirs as needed (i.e. coordinating separate
help systems for currently separate product lines resulting from a
merger).
Currently we use RH 5, although the original/current plan is
to upgrade to RH 7 around February.
Because our documentation is almost solely help files (with
almost no printed documentation), FM's word processing capabilities
do not seem especially relevant, so I'm left wondering what general
advantage/disadvantages FM has in comparison to RH as a help
authoring tool:
1. What advantages does FM have over RH? (from my research so
far, support for DITA seems to be one example of an advantage)
2. What disadvantages does FM have in relation to RH? What
would we be specifically losing out on?
3. What, if any, integration capabilities does FM have with
RH that would be relevant for us? (again, given that we do not work
with larger documentation such as manuals).
Although I believe the current thinking is to either stay
with RH or switch to FM, using both (with or without the full
Technical Communication Suite) may also be an option if there's
enough benefit to using both.
Thanks in advance for any information regarding this
issue!Hi, and welcome to the Forums!
You have obviously done some good homework on both
applications. I'm tempted to say that RoboHelp 7 makes the most
sense because of your comment about "almost no printed
documentation." However, because of your company's "cultural"
affinity for FrameMaker, it might be wise to use RoboHelp 7 within
the Technical Communication Suite as a way of future-proofing any
direction the company may be heading as new technologies (like
DITA) emerge.
FrameMaker is well-regarded as "industrial-strength" software
for print-oriented documentation and manuals with secondary focus
on producing online help. Conversely, RoboHelp's strength has been
on creating online help with a secondary focus on generating
printed documentation. Now, with the Technical Communication Suite
an author can marry the advantages of both. It provides a "platform
to grown on" as an organization might scale to emerging
technologies like DITA.
With the Tech Comm Suite you get the ability to more cleanly
import FrameMaker files into your RoboHelp projects and then "link"
the FrameMaker files and update them as the original FM file
changes. I don't know how useful that is for you right now, but it
is worth a look.
Also, not to be glanced over is the nice integration with
Adobe Captivate which is rapidly growing as a method of
incorporating animated Quick Start videos into RoboHelp online help
and knowledgebases.
Another thing to think about with the Tech Comm Suite is that
Adobe has mentioned they are putting a lot accelerated development
effort into enhancing this platform. Because of this, I think the
suite is a good investment particularly because the upgrade price
right now is really attractive.
That's just my 2 cents. Frankly I am a RoboHelp developer and
not that much of a practitioner of FrameMaker. But as I continue to
work with FrameMaker colleagues who provide their files to me,
having the suite helps me import their work into my projects more
seamlessly.
Also, be sure to check out the
Adobe Tech Comm Blog as
you make your evaluation.
Hope this helps.
john -
Adobe Technical Communications Suite - Importing Framemaker Files into Robohelp
We have just started using the Adobe Technical Communications
Suite to import our Framemaker files into Robohelp. (We have about
a year’s experience of taking Framemaker files into Web Works
Publisher, with good results so we were hoping for a similar
experience with Robohelp).
Please can you help us with the following two problems:
1. Importing FM files into Robohelp has posed some immediate
table formatting problems. We imported the FM files by reference
according to the instructions but cannot format the tables, ie.
Colors etc.
2. Can you also tell us if there is a way to set up our
graphics in Framemaker to import into Robohelp without first having
to run them through a batch file scenario to change the size for
online help. Also, can you explain why the imported graphics are
being put into separate folders in Robohelp – is there a
system option where we can stop this from occurring.
We are a little frustrated because we are long-time users of
Robohelp and Framemaker and are finding some of the new features of
TCS are not as helpful as we first thought. I am sending these
questions after spending several hours going through the Robohelp
Help and the Adobe website and not finding the answers.
Thanks for your help,
Asra S.I have purchased the Technical Communications Suite and am
working with it now. I am finding several short comings in the
product – 60% great product and 40% not so great. I have been
using FrameMaker and RoboHelp for about 11 years and also I am a
Webworks (ePublisher) user. I was expecting (at a minimum) to have
the same functionality as ePublisher in TCS - ePublisher works
seamlessly with FrameMaker. Quadralay worked with me the first
month to answer my questions to ensure I was pleased with the
product - and welcomed/appreciated my feedback. In some cases they
provided me with scripts to accommodate my needs. I am finding on
message boards and forums that a lot of users as very disappointed
with your product so far. Are there any plans on
improving/enhancing the product to accommodate our basic requests?
The standard answer we get concerning graphics and tables is
to use conditional text. This is not single-sourcing and is a
horrible recommended work-around – a hack if you will. We use
conditional text to handle differences in program functionality. I
understand there is some set up required when you create a new
project in RoboHelp, but after that I would like to run the Batch
File process to simply generate my newly updated FM files to online
help. How efficient is that? VERY!
I have provided a list of the basic missing
functionality/oversights that would greatly improve the product and
satisfy a lot of your current users. Some of these issues may be
user misunderstanding and in that case I seek guidance on what
I’m doing wrong. Take the other issues into consideration
because these are not just my issues, but a TON of your users.
Hopefully you are user focused and are as concerned as we are.
Please welcome this feedback as a way to improve the product.
- No Breadcrumbs supported with MS HTML Help - supported in
your other outputs and is available in ePublisher, so it must be
possible.
- Table formats are not configurable – why? Sometimes
the converted table format from FM isn’t 100%.
- Imported file structure (folder for each chapter) totally
hoses my fix to poor graphic rendering. Currently I use a batch
file to run a Photoshop macro/action on my graphic source files to
reduce the file size by 50% and sharpen. I replace the graphics
with my graphics and they look marvelous in online help. I copy my
source graphics back into my “graphics folder” imported
into FM at 260 dpi for my printed docs. Can we have the option on
the structure for imported FM files to put them all into one
folder?
- Text entered into the Auto numbering field is not converted
when importing by reference. It is when just doing a straight
import. This is used for standardizing my inserted tables with
pre-populated column titles– Troubleshooting, If/Then, etc.
- Too many CSS issues. It would be nice to have one main
template that we can sync to when the master template is changed.
- Can’t specify a default template to apply to all FM
files when imported.
- My output .chm file is not picking up my Project Settings.
It will not display Favorites, My Window Size, it’s not
showing the TOC.
- Cross-references – sometimes they work and sometimes
they don’t.
- Markers – we use markers for glossary terms and the
character tagging carries forward throughout the rest of the
sentence.
I started testing the product four days ago and these are the
major issues that are keeping me from moving forward with my
overall plan to move to structured FM. I’m now between a rock
and a hard place because now my department does not have the
software to do their job. Do I go to management and tell them that
I made the wrong decision in my tool selection? I choose your TCS
over the updated Quadralay ePublisher that works with FM8…
Maybe they went up on their price because the knew their former
users would come back and be willing to pay the increased price for
their software that generates online help with just a click of a
button.
Thank you for taking the time to read this and for your help
in advance. Please direct these concerns to those in charge of
enhancing the product (Product Evangelist). A reply and technical
support is greatly appreciated.
Director of Technical Publications - Horizon Software
International, LLC
Nikki Bridwell -
FrameMaker document link to Robohelp
hi,
I have created a robohelp project and also a document in FrameMaker. When i tried to link the FrameMaker document through Robohelp, 'link-> FrameMaker' option is disabled, but it allows me to link a word document. I'm using the trail version of Robohelp9 and FrameMaker10. Is it because of compatibilty issue??Did you installed these FrameMaker and RoboHelp build from tech com suite DVD or from Individual product DVDs ?
If these prodcuts are not installed from suite DVD they will not show the suite features even in the trial mode!
Hope this asnwers your query
Regards
Ashish -
It's official. RoboHelp Lives!
Thanx to Chuck Martin, scribe at the WritersUA conference
here in Palm Springs, there's good news about RoboHelp.
http://ua2006.blogspot.com/
There have been group forums and nearly 20 separate
one-on-one meetings between RoboHelp engineering and product
managers and RoboHelp users over the past two days and more
sessions tomorrow. Adobe has had an earful of requests for future
development. Clearly, Adobe has a way different attitude and is
aggressively pursuing new development.
Stay tuned.
JohnThere are still some who have not see the messages on this
and other message boards. To clarify and bring together the various
reports, I will try to be as specific as I can about what I know
regarding RoboHelp's future. This is based on reporting at the
WritersUA conference, April 9-12.
1. On April 11, at the WritersUA conference Karl Matthews,
Adobe Group Product Marketing Manager made a public statement to
several hundred technical writers at the gathering. He said that
Adobe is committed to RoboHelp and that a new release was in
progress and expected "in the first quarter of 2007, if not
before." So, while this may not be the "date certain" that many
would like, it is about as specific as can be expected, given that
Adobe is a public company and they must be careful because of SEC
regulations.
2. Among the 7 Adobe representatives at this conference in
addition to Karl were Vipul Bansar, RoboHelp's Product Manager and
Vivek Kumar, directing RoboHelp's engineering effort on the next
release, Michael Hu, RoboHelp's Product Marketing Manager, Jeff
Booher, engineering (who goes back to Blue Sky Software and eHelp),
RJ Jacquez, RoboHelp and Framemaker evangelist (also formerly of
eHelp), and Raul Ramos, Product Support Specialist (also formerly
with eHelp)
3. During the three-day conference, there was a RoboHelp
Customer Advisory Forum held with the Adobe representatives with 12
writers representing many facets of the user community offer their
ideas on the next release. In addition, there were more than 20
additional one-on-one meetings between RoboHelp users and Adobe
engineers.
4. The meetings of these more than 30 RoboHelpers resulted
from a public invitation to submit a questionnaire offering their
thoughts on RoboHelp's future. Anyone can still download this
questionnaire and submit it so that their thoughts are included.
You will find it here
http://www.hypertexas.com/
5. From my discussions with the engineering team, I gathered
that considerable progress was made at WritersUA. We often think of
these kinds of gatherings as superficial marketing events. But as
an instructor, concerned about Adobe's commitment, I was pleased to
see they came to WritersUA to "work" rather than schmooze.
6. Adobe is positioning RoboHelp as part of a family of
technical documentation tools that include Framemaker, Captivate
and Acrobat. Personally, I think this is a great group of products
as they can all thrive on the synergy.
The Adobe folks remarked that the rich input they received
will actually accelerate the process because it both validated some
key development areas as well as exposed others that should receive
more attention than they first realized. I got the impression that
because of WritersUA, the release would be sooner not later.
As for working with WIndows Vista, future XML help formats
and the rest, it certainly makes sense that a company of Adobe's
stature would release a product that is compatible with such a
major operating system.
I am not an Adobe employee, nor an official spokesperson. I
am an independent RoboHelp instructor since 1992 and very happy to
see that Adobe has taken a 180 degree turnaround from the previous
management.
John Daigle
Adobe RoboHelp/Captivate Instructor
www.hypertexas.com -
RoboHelp Html 8 DITA indexterm
Hi,
I am trying to generate a RoboHelp project from a DITA map file. Most things do work fine, but I have not been able to figure out how to generate the RoboHelp index from the "indexterm" expressions in the DITA files.
When I look at the original DITA xslt files, there is some basic treatment of the indexterm tags, but of course there is no notion of RoboHelp index files. Any hints how to best approach this problem?Well, here is my own answer (RoboHelp 8, Framemaker 9):
In Framemaker/DITA add behind the title or shortdescription a prolog tag, thereafter metadata, keywords, indexterm.
Add your indexterms.
When moving to RoboHelp, these terms will be added to the RoboHelp index.
When you want to create a Framemaker book you probably want to hide the metadata. This can be done making the prolog tags conditional.
In Framemaker, go to menu DITA > DITA Options... and select "Conditionalize prolog on file open". You need to open and save each file once to have this option come into effect.
When you go to create a Framemaker document, open your DITA map file and choose File > Save as... and choose "Composite Document 9.0 (*.fm)".
Open the file just created and go to menu Special > Conditional Text > Show/Hide Conditional Text...
In the respective tab select radio button option "Show as per Condition" and make sure, that the DITA-Prolog element appears on the list of "Hide" elements on the right.
That's it, folks. -
FrameMaker 11.0.2 Patch Released
Hello Everyone,
I am working as FrameMaker Product Manager at Adobe. I am pleased to announce the availability of FrameMaker 11.0.2 patch, in which we have fixed several critical issues reported by our valued partners and customers.
The detailed blog, describing all the bugs fixed in the patch, is available at http://blogs.adobe.com/techcomm/?p=6824
I encourage everyone to install the patch using "Help -> Update" command from within FrameMaker 11.
I would like to thank all those who contributed by reporting the issues and helping us improve the product.
Vikram Verma
Product Manager
RoboHelp I FrameMaker I Technical Communication Suite I RoboHelp ServerDoes the trial download include this wonderful patch #11.0.2? If not would I be able to patch the trial version if I decide to download and try it on my machine?
i don't have framework on my system yet but would like to try it to see what it can do for me. I hope it doesn't go on the cloud soon now that we know FBI and CIA are trawling the major players (M$, google and Facebook to name the few) to mine data for their very big database for the entire planet.
Thanks.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hello - I've recently upgraded to CS3 and seem to be having issues with inserted Flash files not appearing when I preview them on my local system as well as the hosting server. The Script folder and .js file are generated as should be, but the Flash
-
Report Viewer 2015 not navigating to next page
I am using a report viewer 2015 in an ASP.NET application with credentials passed using IReportServerConnection2. But after clicking next page on report viewer toolbar, 2nd page of report is not shown. The issue is reproducible with ASP.NET applica
-
Xperia dPad in flash... can we access it?
I am creating a game in Flash CS 5.5 and would like to include support for the Sony Xperia Play - which has a built in dPad style controller and fire/start/etc. buttons. I have tried every method I know of capturing keyboard input, but nothing. Is th
-
My question remains the same.
-
NO access to certain cells when passing 2D array to DLL
I am trying to feed a 2D array (image reading) to a DLL, but it always gives a 1097 error. I debugged the original C++ code. It narrows down to the point that some pixels cannot be read. So I write a simple C code to reproduce the issue. As you can