RSPCM is taking long time

Hi,
RSPCM is taking long time to open at the same time RSPC is working fine
when I try to change the process chain status through RSPC_PROCESS_FINISH . it is executing for long time no response. I tried executing it backgrond also from past 2 days it is running, no progress.
Our basis team created index to all backend table of RSPCM, still issue persist. Please suggest me some to get rid of this.
Br,
Harish

hi,
Please check the below thread
RSPCM T-Code was executing very slow
Please check note 1372931
hope it helps!
Edited by: Lavanya J on Nov 4, 2011 1:32 PM

Similar Messages

SSRS Reports taking long time to load

Hello,
Problem : SSRS Reports taking long time to load
My System environment : Visual Studio 2008 SP1 and SQL Server 2008 R2
Production Environment : Visual Studio 2008 SP1 and SQL Server 2008 R2
I have created a Parameterized report (6 parameters), it will fetch data from 1 table. table has 1 year and 6 months data,      I am selecting parameters for only 1 month (about 2500 records). It is taking almost 2 minutes and 30 seconds
to load the report.
This report running efficiently in my system (report load takes only 5 to 6 seconds) but in
production it is taking 2 minutes 30 seconds.
I have checked the Execution log from production so I found the timing for
Data retrieval (approx~)    Processing (approx~)           Rendering (approx~)
10 second                                  15 sec
        2 mins and 5 sec.
But Confusing point is that , if I run the same report at different time overall output time is same (approx) 2 min 30 sec but
Data retrieval (approx~)       Processing (approx~)                Rendering (approx~)
more than 1 min                            15 sec
more than 1 min
so 1 question why timings are different ?
My doubts are
1) If query(procedure to retrieve the data) is the problem then it should take more time always,
2) If Report structure is problem then rendering will also take same time (long time)
for this (2nd point) I checked on blog that Rendering depends on environment structure e.g. Network bandwidth, RAM, CPU Usage , Number of users accessing same report at a time.
So I did testing of report when no other user working on any report But failed (same result output is 2 min 30 sec)
From network team I got the result is that there is no issue or overload in CPU usage or RAM also No issue in Network bandwidth.
Production Database Server and Report server are different (but in same network).
I checked that database server the SQL Server is using almost Full RAM (23 GB out of 24 GB)
I tried to allocate the memory to less amount up to 2GB (Trial solution I got from Blogs) but this on also failed.
one hint I got from colleague that , change the allocated memory setting from static memory to dynamic to SQL Server
(I guess above point is the same) I could not find that option Static and Dynamic memory setting.
I did below steps
Connected to SQL Server Instance
Right click on Instance go to properties, Go to Memory Tab
I found three options 1) Server Memory   2) Other memory   3) Section for "Configured values and Running values"
Then I tried to reduce Maximum Server memory up to 2 GB (As mentioned above)
All trials failed, this issue I could not find the roots for this issue.
Can anyone please help (it's bit urgent).

Hi UdayKGR,
According to your description, your report takes too long to load on your production environment. Right?
In this scenario, since the report runs quickly in developing environment, we initially think it supposed to be the issue on data retrieval. However, based on the information in execution log, it takes longest time on rendering part. So we suggest you optimize
the report itself to reduce the time for rendering. Please refer to the link below:
My report takes too long to render
Here is another article about overall performance optimization for Reporting Services:
Reporting Services Performance and Optimization
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Best Regards,
Simon Hou

Connecting to the database taking long time to connect database server

Hi
When I execute procedure i am getting the below message at bottom of the Oracle SQL Developer
"Connecting to the database"
it is taking more than 10 min plz guide

Hi
have you installed a normal Oracle Client also on your Host? normal Oracle Client
Did you connect with host:port:sid or with a Oracle Naming Service? through TNS Service
Can you test tnsping <alias> yes, It is working fine
Did other user have the same problem? yes
Did you connect through WAN or LAN connection? LAN (Intranet)
Can you tell more about you client/database setup?
Database setup:
OS: Window 2008 server
version: 11.1.0
Client: 11.1.0
OS: Window 2008 server
Now I am not able to execute single select query which table contains 6 records and 15 columns it is taking long time I have waited 30 min still no resutls
only one table is behaving like this remaining is working fine
Edited by: user9235224 on Oct 6, 2012 7:06 PM

The ODS activation is taking long time

Hi,
We are on SAP NetWeaver BI 701 (Support Package 5).
We create a Z ODS, it will contain a lot of data (180.000.000 month-end) and we want to generate specific reports about it.
The activation is taking long time, I assume is because we checked the flag "SIDs Generation upon Activation". I am confused about this check. I really need it? is this check the only problem.
Thanks for you help.
Victoria

Hi Victoria:
If your Z DSO is used only for staging purposes (you don't have queries based on this DSO and you send the data to another DSO or to an InfoCube) then you don't need to check the "SIDs Generation Upon Activation" box.
Even more, to achieve better performance during data loads in this scenario, you might consider using a Write Optimized DSO instead of a Standard DSO, but if you decide to take this alternative don't forget to select the "Do Not check Uniqueness of Data" box if you need to write several records with the same Semantic Key.
Regards,
Francisco Milán.

F4 Help is taking long time

Hi All,
We are working on BI 7.0. version
In the varaible pop-up screen we have two info objects.
1. Fiscal year Period
2. JOA(Joint operating aggriment)
If u press F4 for JOA, it is taking long time to execute and finally the application is getting closed.same situation is there in RSRT also.
If i enter with out JOA the query is giving the output. Here i have to restrict the query by JOA.
i have changed the JOA peroperties in query designer.
Query execution for filter value selection = Values in master data table.......
but still the situation is the same.......
Could you please suggest any solution for this.....
Thanks & Regards,
PK

Hi Kamal,
You can set that at the query level in the query designer for each query.
1. Select the corresponding characteristic in the query designer.
2. Goto to the "Extended tab" in the properties
3. Select the "Values in the Master data table" in the "Query execution in the filter value selection.
Also see some recomendations:
Note 748623 - Input help (F4) has a very long runtime - recommendations
Hope this helps.
CK

Update ztable is taking long time

Hi All,
i have run the 5 jobs with the same program at a time but when we check the db trace
zs01 is taking long time as shown below.here zs01 is having small amount of data.
in the below dbtrace for updating zs01 is taking 2,315,485 seconds .how to reduce this?
HH:MM:SS.MS Duration     Program   ObjectName Op.   Curs   Array   Rec     RC     Conn
2:36:15 AM     2,315,485     SAPLZS01 ZS01       FETCH 294     1     1     0     R/3
The code as shown below
you can check the code in the program SAPLZS01 include LZS01F01.
FORM UPDATE_ZS01.
IF ZS02-STATUS = '3'.
    IF Z_ZS02_STATUS = '3'.            "previous status is ERROR
      EXIT.
    ELSE.
      SELECT SINGLE FOR UPDATE * FROM ZS01
             WHERE PROC_NUM    = ZS02-PROC_NUM.
      CHECK SY-SUBRC = 0.
      ADD ZS02-MF_AMT TO ZS01-ERR_AMT.
      ADD 1           TO ZS01-ERR_INVOI.
      UPDATE ZS01.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
my question is when updating the ztable why it is taking such long time,
how to reduce the time or how to make faster to update the ztable .
Thanks in advance,
regards
Suni

Try the code like this..
data: wa_zs01 type zs01.
FORM UPDATE_ZS01.
IF ZS02-STATUS = '3'.
    IF Z_ZS02_STATUS = '3'.            "previous status is ERROR
      EXIT.
    ELSE.
      SELECT SINGLE FOR UPDATE * FROM ZS01
             WHERE PROC_NUM    = ZS02-PROC_NUM.
-- change
CHECK SY-SUBRC = 0.
      ADD ZS02-MF_AMT TO wa_ZS01-ERR_AMT.
      ADD 1           TO wa_ZS01-ERR_INVOI.
      UPDATE ZS01 from wa_zs01.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
And i think this Select query for ZS01 is inside the ZS02 SELECT statement,
This might also make slow process.
If you want to make database access always use Workarea/Internal table to fetch the data
and work with that.
Accessing database like this or with Select.... endselect is an inefficient programming.

Simple query is taking long time

Hi Experts,
The below query is taking long time.
[code]SELECT   FS.*
FROM   ORL.FAX_STAGE FS
         INNER JOIN
               ORL.FAX_SOURCE FSRC
            INNER JOIN
               GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING GBM
            ON GBM.BU_ID = FSRC.BUID
         ON UPPER (FSRC.FAX_NUMBER) = UPPER (FS.DESTINATION)
WHERE       FSRC.IS_DELETED = 'N'
         AND GBM.BU_ID IS NOT NULL
         AND UPPER (FS.FAX_STATUS) ='COMPLETED';[/code]
this query is returning 1645457 records.
[code]PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| Id | Operation           | Name                   | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |                        |   625K|   341M| 45113   (1)|
|   1 | HASH JOIN          |                        |   625K|   341M| 45113   (1)|
|   2 |   NESTED LOOPS      |                        |   611 | 14664 |    22   (0)|
|   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| FAX_SOURCE             | 2290 | 48090 |    22   (0)|
|   4 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN | GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING_BUID |     1 |     3 |     0   (0)|
|   5 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL | FAX_STAGE              | 2324K| 1214M| 45076   (1)|
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Note
   - 'PLAN_TABLE' is old version
15 rows selected.[/code]
The distinct number of records in each table.
[code]SELECT FAX_STATUS,count(*)
FROM fax_STAGE
GROUP BY FAX_STATUS;
FAX_STATUS    COUNT(*)
BROKEN          10
Broken - New    9
Completed    2324493
New             20
SELECT is_deleted,COUNT(*)
FROM FAX_SOURCE
GROUP BY IS_DELETED;
IS_DELETED COUNT(*)
N         2290
Y         78[/code]
Total number of records in each table.
[code]SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ORL.FAX_SOURCE FSRC-- 2368
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ORL.FAX_STAGE--2324532
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM APPS_GLOBAL.GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING--9
[/code]
To improve the performance of this query I have created the following indexes.
[code]Functional based index on UPPER (FSRC.FAX_NUMBER) ,UPPER (FS.DESTINATION) and UPPER (FS.FAX_STATUS).
Bitmap index on FSRC.IS_DELETED.
Normal Index on GBM.BU_ID and FSRC.BUID.
[/code]
But still the performance is bad for this query.
What can I do apart from this to improve the performance of this query.
Please help me .
Thanks in advance.

<I have created the following indexes.
CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_DESTINATION_RAM ON ORL.FAX_STAGE(UPPER("DESTINATION"))
CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_FAX_STATUS_RAM ON ORL.FAX_STAGE(LOWER("FAX_STATUS"))
CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_UPPER_FAX_STATUS_RAM ON ORL.FAX_STAGE(UPPER("FAX_STATUS"))
CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_BUID_RAM ON ORL.FAX_SOURCE(BUID)
CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_FAX_NUMBER_RAM ON ORL.FAX_SOURCE(UPPER("FAX_NUMBER"))
CREATE BITMAP INDEX ORL.IDX_IS_DELETED_RAM ON ORL.FAX_SOURCE(IS_DELETED)
After creating the following indexes performance got improved.
But our DBA said that new BITMAP index at FAX_SOURCE table (ORL.IDX_IS_DELETED_RAM) can cause locks
on multiple rows if IS_DELETED column is in use. Please proceed with detailed tests.
I am sending the explain plan before creating indexes and after indexes has been created.
SELECT FS.*
FROM ORL.FAX_STAGE FS
                INNER JOIN
                ORL.FAX_SOURCE FSRC
              INNER JOIN
                  GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING GBM
                ON GBM.BU_ID = FSRC.BUID
            ON UPPER (FSRC.FAX_NUMBER) = UPPER (FS.DESTINATION)
WHERE      FSRC.IS_DELETED = 'N'
          AND GBM.BU_ID IS NOT NULL
          AND UPPER (FS.FAX_STATUS) =:B1;
--OLD without indexes
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3076973749
| Id | Operation          | Name                  | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time    |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |                        | 141K|    85M| 45130 (1)| 00:09:02 |
|* 1 | HASH JOIN          |                        | 141K|    85M| 45130 (1)| 00:09:02 |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS      |                        | 611 | 18330 |    22 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| FAX_SOURCE            | 2290 | 59540 |    22 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN | GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING_BUID |    1 |    4 |    0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | FAX_STAGE              | 23245 |    13M| 45106 (1)| 00:09:02 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 - access(UPPER("FSRC"."FAX_NUMBER")=UPPER("FS"."DESTINATION"))
3 - filter("FSRC"."IS_DELETED"='N')
4 - access("GBM"."BU_ID"="FSRC"."BUID")
      filter("GBM"."BU_ID" IS NOT NULL)
5 - filter(UPPER("FS"."FAX_STATUS")=SYS_OP_C2C(:B1))
21 rows selected.
--NEW with indexes.
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 665032407
| Id | Operation                        | Name                    | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time    |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |                          | 5995 | 3986K| 3117 (1)| 00:00:38 |
|* 1 | HASH JOIN                      |                          | 5995 | 3986K| 3117 (1)| 00:00:38 |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS                  |                          | 611 | 47658 |    20 (5)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 |    VIEW                          | index$_join$_002        | 2290 | 165K|    20 (5)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4 |    HASH JOIN                    |                          |      |      |            |      |
|* 5 |      HASH JOIN                  |                          |      |      |            |      |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 6 |      BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS|                          | 2290 | 165K|    1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 |        BITMAP INDEX SINGLE VALUE | IDX_IS_DELETED_RAM      |      |      |            |      |
| 8 |      INDEX FAST FULL SCAN      | IDX_BUID_RAM            | 2290 | 165K|    8 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 9 |      INDEX FAST FULL SCAN        | IDX_FAX_NUMBER_RAM      | 2290 | 165K|    14 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 10 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN              | GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING_BUID |    1 |    4 |    0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID    | FAX_STAGE                | 23245 |    13M| 3096 (1)| 00:00:38 |
|* 12 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN              | IDX_UPPER_FAX_STATUS_RAM | 9298 |      | 2434 (1)| 00:00:30 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
1 - access(UPPER("DESTINATION")="FSRC"."SYS_NC00035$")
3 - filter("FSRC"."IS_DELETED"='N')
4 - access(ROWID=ROWID)
5 - access(ROWID=ROWID)
7 - access("FSRC"."IS_DELETED"='N')
10 - access("GBM"."BU_ID"="FSRC"."BUID")
      filter("GBM"."BU_ID" IS NOT NULL)
12 - access(UPPER("FAX_STATUS")=SYS_OP_C2C(:B1))
31 rows selected
Please confirm on the DBA comment.Is this bitmap index locks rows in my case.
Thanks.>

Fwrite() and fread() of a shared FAT32 formatted file is taking long time in MAC osx Lion C program

Hi
Is there any provision or api in MAC to open a file in shared mode same as windows
hUSBdrive = CreateFile(pDriveName, GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE, FILE_SHARE_READ | FILE_SHARE_WRITE, NULL, OPEN_EXISTING, FILE_FLAG_NO_BUFFERING, NULL);
we have the follwing scenario where a file is shared among two processes for read/write.one is running on Linux and the other one is running on MAC.where both the processses are reading/writing into the same memory location in the file say "X"
FAT 32 formatted raw data file which is located on the device, is shared among two processes.
One process is running on Linux device which is connected to MAC book through usb.In this linux process, the file is opened using fopen() and we have used fcntl() with O_DIRECT flag.This process continuously reads/writes data on memory location "X" in the shared file .
The other process is running on Mac which has simple c program that opens the file on the connected device i.e from usb drive and reads/writes data using fread()/fwrite().fopen() is used to open the file and FILE_NOCACHE flag is used to avoid caching.
The value at memory location "X" is updated by mac by using fwrite() and the linux process reads the memory location "X" by using fread(). Linux process is taking around 30 sec to get the updated value.
If the value is updated by Linux process at memory location "X" by using fwrite() the MAC process is also taking long time more than a minute to read the updated value by usng fread().
fwrite()/fread() on mac is taking long time where as the windows application which uses the same apis is taking msec time.
Do we need to use other api s or flags to open file?
thanks in advance.......

does any one face this kind of problem?
fwrite() and fread() takes long time?
Is there any problem in read/write to a fat32 file on MAC?

Sales order creation, standard event trigger is taking long time .

We have a requirement where we are sending data to CRM system using RFC function module. This data is sent while sales order creation or change. We have used standard event BUS2032.CREATED to trigger CRM FM in sales order creation mode. In sales order change mode, we are using custom event. In production system, our custom change event is getting triggered fine and data is sent to CRM system with small time lag of around 1 minute. But, while sales order creation, standard event trigger is taking long time ( sometimes about 20 minutes) in production system.
We tried triggering same custom event at the time of sales order creation using FM u2018SWE_EVENT_CREATE_IN_UPD_TASKu2019 as well but, still we are not able to improve performance of the event trigger at sales order creation.
Regards,
Sushee Joshi

HI,
we have written SWE_EVENT_CREATE in update task
I think instead of calling in update task simply call to function module CALL FUNCTION "SWE_EVENT_CREATE" might trigger the event immediately.. Did you try to check in this way..
OR
And I also suggest you to check the entry in SWE2 txn with respect to your workflow tempalte, may be you have enable the option ENABLE EVENT QUEUE, this could be one of the reasons.. If it is enabled please disable it (uncheck)
Please check..
Regards
Pavan

VB Macro in Bex Analyser is taking long time to complete execution

Hi Experts,
In a FI query , we have a VB macro which update the excel sheets by taking values from the previous excel sheets .
The issue is its taking long time for query execution and if we are keep on pressing 'ENTER' button . The query is running very fastly and is giving the results ,but its not a correct way to do.
Its a critical issue in Production and can anyone help me to resolve the issue.
Regards,
Anju

Hi Anju,
I need to create a VB macro in one of my query but i not familiar how i can plug the VB code into the query.
Please can you give me some basic procedure on how to do that?
What i need to do exactly is to bring a KF from a query into another query. Not sure if this is possible using VB.
Let me know.
Thanks.
Cesar

Retry recovery action is taking long time to complete

Hi,
I am in the process of testing error handling for my BPEL process.
As part of it, I have given the default recover action in the fault policy of the process as retry with a retry count of 3 times with retry interval as 2.
To test this, i have changed the target end point uri of the target service to some invalid url and ran the process.
First I was not able to find the BPEL process instance at all in the console.
Later I was able to find the instance after half an hour. When I saw the instance, if retry had happened or not.
I found that the retry happened for 3 times, but it took 30 mins for the first retry to complete and start the second retry.
Can anyone please let me know why the retry is taking long time although the retry interval I gave is only 2 seconds.
THanks in advance!!!!

Hi,
Please find below the fault policy file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<faultPolicy version="2.0.1" id="TestFaultPolicy" xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns="http://schemas.oracle.com/bpel/faultpolicy" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
     <Conditions>
     <faultName>
     <condition>
     <action ref="aia-ora-retry"/>
     </condition>
     </faultName>
     </Conditions>
     <Actions>
          <Action id="aia-ora-retry">
               <retry>
                    <retryCount>3</retryCount>
                    <retryInterval>2</retryInterval>
                    <exponentialBackoff/>
                    <retryFailureAction ref="aia-ora-java"/>
                    <retrySuccessAction ref="aia-ora-java"/>
               </retry>
          </Action>
          
          <Action id="ora-replay-scope">
               <replayScope/>
          </Action>
          
          <Action id="ora-rethrow-fault">
               <rethrowFault/>
          </Action>
          
          <Action id="ora-human-intervention">
               <humanIntervention/>
          </Action>
          
          <Action id="ora-terminate">
               <abort/>
          </Action>
          <Action id="aia-ora-java">
          <javaAction className="oracle.apps.aia.core.eh.BPELJavaAction" defaultAction="ora-rethrow-fault">
          <returnValue value="REPLAY" ref="ora-terminate"/>
          <returnValue value="RETRHOW" ref="ora-rethrow-fault"/>
          <returnValue value="ABORT" ref="ora-terminate"/>
          <returnValue value="RETRY" ref="aia-ora-retry"/>
          <returnValue value="MANUAL" ref="ora-human-intervention"/>
          </javaAction>
</Action>
     </Actions>
</faultPolicy>

Master Dataload is taking long time to complete

Hi
In last couple of weeks, we are experience the delay for master dataload job. These dataload should take 5-8 minute to complete but it is taking more then 5 hour to complete. here we are using process chain for master dataload.
Any idea? We don't understand where to start to check the root cause of this problem.
Regards
Amar

Hi Freinds
Some update of our master dataload. Still not resolved.
Seem to me, our problem is related to Hierarchy in BW server.It is taking long time to update the hierarchy in BW server. As i told you, problem occur only when loading master dataload. For transaction dataload, no IDOC get stuck in R/3 (NPR) server. There are enough resources in both R/3 and BW server for trfc.
There are total 9 hierarchy in the master dataload that is delaying in the process for update. If you have seen this type of problem for the following hierarchy, pls update me.
A     0ACCOUNT (InfoSource)
     Hierarchy
1     Fin statement vers FSV5
2     Cost Element by fun area
B     0COSTCENTER (InfoSource)
     Hierarchy
3     Mitel Network
4     NA MNS Total
5     CEO
6     Global Support Cost center
C     0COORDER (infosource)
     Hierarchy
7     Total R&D (Ron Wellard)
8     RD YRD1
9     RD YRD2
Regards
Amarjit

Requisition Import is taking long time to complete

Hi,
I'm working with EBS 11.5.10 CU2, I have Requisition Import program scheduled, usually it's completing normal in around 5minutes; but sometimes it's taking around 30 minutes to complete. I compared the output files of program completing normal and taking long time, latter one has processed less requisitions than former one.
Could somebody help what could be possible reasons to check for program to take long time to complete.
Please help.
Thanks

945756 wrote:
Hi,
I'm working with EBS 11.5.10 CU2, I have Requisition Import program scheduled, usually it's completing normal in around 5minutes; but sometimes it's taking around 30 minutes to complete. I compared the output files of program completing normal and taking long time, latter one has processed less requisitions than former one.
Could somebody help what could be possible reasons to check for program to take long time to complete.
Please help.
ThanksDo you have the statistics collected up to date?
Please enable trace and generate the TKPROF file to find out why it takes that long -- https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=TKPROF+AND+Concurrent&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15&rankBy=10001
Thanks,
Hussein

Identifying which part of stored procedure is taking long time

Hi Everyone,
I have a stored procedure which is taking long time to execute. I am trying to understand which part/query in the stored procedure is taking long time.
It involves lots of table variables and n no of queries .Could anyone please help me in how to identify which query/part of the stored procedure is taking long time to execute?
Thanks in Advance

Hi Vivek -
I am only familiar with running the plan visualization for a single SQL query.
Could you please guide me how to run it for a procedure.
Thanks in Advance.

This part of query is taking long time to run, its about 40 minutes. Can anyone help wit it.

------Load Dataset into Temp table---------------
SELECT
z.SYSTEMNAME
--,Case when ZXC.[Subsystem Name] <> 'NULL' Then zxc.[SubSystem Name]
--else NULL
--End AS SubSystemName
, CASE
WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
(SELECT DISTINCT zxc.TIN
FROM dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking zxc
WHERE zxc.[SubSystem Name] <> 'NULL'
THEN
(SELECT DISTINCT [Subsystem Name]
FROM dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking zxc
WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = zxc.TIN)
End As SubSYSTEMNAME
,z.PROVIDERNAME
,z.STATECODE
,z.PROV_TAX_ID
,z.SRC_PAR_CD
,SUM(z.SEQUEST_AMT) Actual_Sequestered_Amt
, CASE
WHEN z.SRC_PAR_CD IN ('E','O','S','W')
THEN 'Nonpar Waiver'
--**Amendment Mailed**
--WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
When EXISTS
(SELECT DISTINCT b.PROV_TIN
FROM dbo.SQS_Mailed_TINs_010614 b WITH (NOLOCK )
where not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t where b.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
THEN
(SELECT DISTINCT b.Mailing
FROM dbo.SQS_Mailed_TINs_010614 b WITH (NOLOCK )
WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = b.PROV_TIN
-- --**Amendment Mailed Wave 3 and 4**
--WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID In
When EXISTS
(SELECT
qz.PROV_TIN
FROM
[SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz WITH (NOLOCK )
where qz.Mailing = 'Amendment Mailed (3rd Wave)'
and not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t WITH (NOLOCK ) where qz.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
THEN 'Amendment Mailed (3rd Wave)'
WHEN EXISTS
(SELECT
qz.PROV_TIN
FROM
[SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz WITH (NOLOCK )
where qz.Mailing = 'Amendment Mailed (4th Wave)'
and not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t WITH (NOLOCK ) where qz.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
THEN 'Amendment Mailed (4th Wave)'
-- --Is Puerto Rico of Lifesynch
WHEN EXISTS
(SELECT DISTINCT a.PROV_TAX_ID
FROM PACT.dbo.SQS_NonPar_PR_LS_TINs a WITH (NOLOCK )
WHERE a.Bucket <> 'Nonpar'
THEN
(SELECT DISTINCT a.Bucket
FROM PACT.dbo.SQS_NonPar_PR_LS_TINs a WITH (NOLOCK )
WHERE a.PROV_TAX_ID = z.PROV_TAX_ID)
-- --**Top Objecting Systems**
WHEN z.SYSTEMNAME IN
('ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM','ASCENSION HEALTH ALLIANCE','AULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION','BANNER HEALTH SYSTEM','BERT FISH MEDICAL CENTER','BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL','BJC HEALTHCARE','BLOUNT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL','BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL','CAROMONT HEALTH SYSTEM','CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES','CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE PARTNERS','CHRISTUS HEALTH',/*'CLEVELAND CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM',*/'COLUMBUS REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM','COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC','COXHEALTH','HCA','HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES','HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM','INTEGRIS HEALTH','JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER','LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM','MARTIN MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM','MERCY','MT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER (MIAMI)','MUNROE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER','NORMAN REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM','NORTHSIDE HEALTH SYSTEM','SHANDS HEALTHCARE','SISTERS OF MERCY - SPRINGFIELD, MO','SSM HEALTH CARE','ST LUKES HEALTH SYSTEM','SUMMA HEALTH SYSTEM','SUSQUEHANNA HEALTH SYSTEM','TBD -- TRINITY HEALTH - CATHOLIC HEALTH EAST','UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI HEALTH SYSTEM','UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HOSPITALS','UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HEALTH CARE')
THEN 'Top Objecting Systems'
WHEN EXISTS
(SELECT
h.PROV_TAX_ID
FROM
#HIHO_Records h
INNER JOIN SQS_Provider_Tracking obj WITH (NOLOCK )
ON h.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Top Objector'
WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID
OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
)and z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD IN ('HO','HI')
THEN 'Top Objecting Systems'
-- --**Other Objecting Hospitals**
WHEN EXISTS
(SELECT
h.PROV_TAX_ID
FROM
#HIHO_Records h
INNER JOIN SQS_Provider_Tracking obj WITH (NOLOCK )
ON h.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Objector'
WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID
OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
)and z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD IN ('HO','HI')
THEN 'Other Objecting Hospitals'
-- --**Objecting Physicians**
WHEN EXISTS
(SELECT z.PROV_TAX_ID
FROM SQS_EDW_Source z WITH (NOLOCK)
WHERE EXISTS
(SELECT DISTINCT
obj.TIN
FROM SQS_Provider_Tracking obj WITH (NOLOCK )
WHERE obj.[Objector?] in ('Objector','Top Objector')
and z.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
and z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD not IN ('HO','HI')
THEN 'Objecting Physicians'
--****Rejecting Hospitals****
WHEN EXISTS
(SELECT
h.PROV_TAX_ID
FROM
#HIHO_Records h
INNER JOIN SQS_Provider_Tracking obj WITH (NOLOCK )
ON h.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Rejector'
WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID
OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
)and z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD IN ('HO','HI')
THEN 'Rejecting Hospitals'
--****Rejecting Physciains****
WHEN EXISTS
(SELECT obj.TIN
FROM SQS_Provider_Tracking obj WITH (NOLOCK )
WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Rejector')
and z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD NOT IN ('HO','HI')
THEN 'REjecting Physicians'
----**********ALL OBJECTORS SHOULD HAVE BEEN BUCKETED AT THIS POINT IN THE QUERY**********
-- --**Non-Objecting Hospitals**
WHEN EXISTS
(SELECT DISTINCT
h.PROV_TAX_ID
FROM
#HIHO_Records h WITH (NOLOCK )
WHERE
(z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID)
OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
)and z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD IN ('HO','HI')
THEN 'Non-Objecting Hospitals'
-- **Outstanding Contracts for Review**
WHEN EXISTS
(SELECT qz.PROV_TIN
FROM
[PACT].[HUMAD\ARS3766].[SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz WITH (NOLOCK )
where qz.Mailing = 'Non-Objecting Bilateral Physicians'
AND z.PROV_TAX_ID = qz.PROV_TIN)
Then 'Non-Objecting Bilateral Physicians'
When EXISTS
(select
p.prov_tax_id
from dbo.SQS_CoC_Potential_Mail_List p WITH (NOLOCK )
where p.amendmentrights <> 'Unilateral'
AND z.prov_tax_id = p.prov_tax_id)
THEN 'Non-Objecting Bilateral Physicians'
WHEN EXISTS
(SELECT
qz.PROV_TIN
FROM
[SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz WITH (NOLOCK )
where qz.Mailing = 'More Research Needed'
AND qz.PROV_TIN = z.PROV_TAX_ID)
THEN 'More Research Needed'
WHEN EXISTS (SELECT qz.PROV_TIN FROM [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz WITH (NOLOCK ) where qz.Mailing = 'Objector' AND qz.PROV_TIN = z.PROV_TAX_ID)
THEN 'ERROR'
else 'Market Review/Preparing to Mail'
END AS [Updated Bucket]
,COALESCE(q.INDdesc, f.IND_desc) AS INDdesc
,f.Time_Period_for_Dispute
,f.Renew_Term_Ind
,f.Renewal_Date
,z.SMG_ID
,'' AS OrderedRank
INTO SQS_Bucketed_Details_SMG_on_SMGXXX
From #SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG z
left join #F f ON f.PROV_TAX_ID = z.PROV_TAX_ID
AND z.SYSTEMNAME = f.SYSTEM_NAME
AND z.PROVIDERNAME = f.Provider
Left join #Q q ON z.PROV_TAX_ID = q.TIN
GROUP BY z.SYSTEMNAME
--,Z.[SubsystemName]
,z.PROVIDERNAME
,z.STATECODE
,z.PROV_TAX_ID
,z.SRC_PAR_CD
,q.INDdesc
,f.IND_Desc
,f.Time_Period_for_Dispute
,f.Renew_Term_Ind
,f.Renewal_Date
,z.SMG_ID
,z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD
As I am a developer I do not have the access to Sql profiler or tuning agent to optimize my query, I have used some joins over the temp table #HIHO which indeed pulling the records from table EDW_Source which has 5 million records, I also added Non clustered
indexes on prov_ID, SMG_ID and Incurred month for this table, but still it is taking longer time. Need help

Hi, It needs some more tweaks but pls try this one
USE
Go
--****Create sqs_objector_TINs (Objections and Rejections)****
--Drop table .dbo.sqs_objector_TINs
select distinct a.TIN as Prov_TIN
Into #sqs_objector_TINs
from .dbo.sqs_provider_tracking as a with (nolock)
where a.[Objector?] in ('Top Objector','Objector','Rejector')
/*********** Query for SQS_TINtoSyst***********/
--DROP TABLE .dbo.SQS_TINtoSystem
select distinct
b.SRC_PROV_ID
--,case
-- when a.SYSTEM_NAME is null
-- then
-- case
-- when a.CTRCT_GRP_NAME is null
-- then a.PROV_SMG_NAME
-- else a.CTRCT_GRP_NAME
-- end
-- else a.SYSTEM_NAME
--end as SYSTEM_NAME
,COALESCE(a.SYSTEM_NAME, a.CTRCT_GRP_NAME, a.PROV_SMG_NAME) AS SYSTEM_NAME
INTO #SQS_TINtoSystem
from
PARE.dbo.EDW_PROD_HOSPITAL_MASTER a with (nolock)
Inner Join PARE.dbo.EDW_PROD_HOSPITAL_ID_XREF b with (nolock)
on a.SMG_ID = b.SMG_ID
-- Inner Join .dbo.SQS_EDW_Source q
--on b.SRC_PROV_ID = q.PROV_TAX_ID
where b.SRC_PLATFORM_CD = 'TX'
and exists
select
SMG_ID
from PARE.dbo.EDW_PROD_HOSPITAL_ID_XREF as t1 with (nolock)
where SRC_PLATFORM_CD = 'TX'
and exists (select q.PROV_TAX_ID from .dbo.SQS_EDW_Source q with (nolock) where q.PROV_TAX_ID = b.SRC_PROV_ID)
and a.SMG_ID = t1.SMG_ID
/************** Query for SQS_Bucketed_Details_SMG*****************/
DROP TABLE .dbo.SQS_Bucketed_Details_SMG
--Create temp table
SELECT z.SYSTEMNAME
,Z.PROV_TAX_ID
,z.PROVIDERNAME
,z.STATECODE
,z.SRC_PAR_CD
,z.SEQUEST_AMT
,case when Z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD IN ('HI','HO') Then 'H' else 'P' end as Hosp_Ind
,Z.SMG_ID
INTO #SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG
FROM dbo.SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG z with (nolock)
WHERE (Z.Incurred_Mth >= convert(datetime,'01/01/2013')) and (Z.Incurred_Mth < convert(datetime, '1/1/2014'))
--between convert(datetime,'01/01/2013') and convert(datetime, '12/31/2013 23:59:59.996')
--YEAR(Z.Incurred_Mth)=2013
-- Create Temp table Q
select
x.TIN,
case when max(x.IND) = 'NYN'
then 'Standard'
when max(x.IND) = 'YNN'
then 'Express'
when max(x.IND) = 'NNY'
then 'Non_Standard' else 'Mixed'
end as INDdesc
Into #Q
FROM
(SELECT
a.tin,
MAX(a.express) + MAX(a.StandardInd) + MAX(NonstandardIND) as IND
from
(select r.TIN,
case when MAX(r.Express) like 'Y%' then 'Y' else 'N' end As Express,
case when MAX(r.Standard) = 'Y' then 'Y' else 'N' end As StandardInd,
case when MAX(r.[Non-Standard]) = 'Y' then 'Y' else 'N' end AS NonstandardIND
FROM DBO.SQS_Objectors_01032014 r with (nolock)
GROUP BY r.TIN) a
group by a.TIN) x
group by x.TIN
--Create Temp table F
Select *
INTO #F
FROM(
SELECT distinct g.prov_tax_id
,g.system_name
,g.provider
,case when g.reimburse_mixed = 'Y' then 'Mixed'
when g.reimburse_express = 'Y' then 'Express'
when g.reimburse_standard = 'Y' then 'Standard'
when g.reimburse_NonStandard = 'Y' then 'NonStandard'
end as IND_Desc
,g.Time_Period_for_Dispute
,case when g.Renewal_Date = 'N' and g.Expiration_Date = 'N'
then 'Unclear'
when g.Renewal_Date = 'N' and g.Expiration_Date <> 'N'
then 'Termination'
when g.Renewal_Date <> 'N' and g.Expiration_Date = 'N'
then 'Evergreen'
when g.Renewal_Date <> 'N' and g.Expiration_Date <> 'N'
then 'Termination'
else 'Unknown'
end as 'Renew_Term_Ind'
,g.Renewal_Date
FROM
(select distinct
bb.PROV_TAX_ID1 as prov_tax_id
,aa.*
from
[dbo].[Top_600_Hospitals3] aa with (nolock)
left join pare.dbo.EDW_PROD_HOSPITAL_MASTER bb with (nolock)
on --a.CTRCT_GRP_NAME = b.CTRCT_GRP_NAME
aa.Provider = bb.PROV_SMG_NAME
-- and (a.SYSTEM_NAME = b.SMG_SYS_NAME or a.SYSTEM_NAME = b.SYSTEM_NAME)
--and a.ADDR_LINE1 = b.ADDR_LINE1
and aa.STATE_CD = bb.STATE_CD
--and a.ZIP_CD = b.ZIP_CD
and aa.City1 = bb.CITY_NAME
where aa.SYSTEM_NAME <> 'SEE ABOVE') g
where g.system_name <> 'SEE ABOVE') h
where h.ind_Desc is not null
SELECT DISTINCT z.PROV_TAX_ID
, z.SMG_ID
INTO #HIHO_Records
FROM SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG z with (nolock)
WHERE z.LCLM_RSTMT_TREND_CAT_CD IN ('HO', 'HI')
AND Z.Incurred_Mth >=convert(datetime, '1/1/2013') and Z.Incurred_Mth <convert(datetime, '1/1/2014')
--YEAR(Z.Incurred_Mth)=2013
---------------------------------Load Dataset into Temp table---------------
SELECT
z.SYSTEMNAME
--,Case when ZXC.[Subsystem Name] <> 'NULL' Then zxc.[SubSystem Name]
--else NULL
--End AS SubSystemName
, CASE
WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
(SELECT zxc.TIN
FROM dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking zxc with (nolock)
WHERE zxc.[SubSystem Name] <> 'NULL'
THEN
(SELECT top 1 [Subsystem Name]
FROM dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking zxc with (nolock)
WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = zxc.TIN)
End As SubSYSTEMNAME
,z.PROVIDERNAME
,z.STATECODE
,z.PROV_TAX_ID
,z.SRC_PAR_CD
,SUM(z.SEQUEST_AMT) Actual_Sequestered_Amt
, CASE
WHEN z.SRC_PAR_CD IN ('E','O','S','W')
THEN 'Nonpar Waiver'
-- --Is Puerto Rico of Lifesynch
WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
(SELECT a.PROV_TAX_ID
FROM .dbo.SQS_NonPar_PR_LS_TINs a with (nolock)
WHERE a.Bucket <> 'Nonpar'
THEN
(SELECT top 1 a.Bucket
FROM .dbo.SQS_NonPar_PR_LS_TINs a with (nolock)
WHERE a.PROV_TAX_ID = z.PROV_TAX_ID)
--**Amendment Mailed**
WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
(SELECT b.PROV_TIN
FROM dbo.SQS_Mailed_TINs_010614 b WITH (NOLOCK )
where not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t with (nolock) where b.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
and z.Hosp_Ind = 'P'
THEN
(SELECT top 1 b.Mailing
FROM dbo.SQS_Mailed_TINs_010614 b with (nolock)
WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = b.PROV_TIN
-- --**Amendment Mailed Wave 3-5**
WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID In
(SELECT
qz.PROV_TIN
FROM
[SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz
where qz.Mailing = 'Amendment Mailed (3rd Wave)'
and not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t with (nolock) where qz.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
and z.Hosp_Ind = 'P'
THEN 'Amendment Mailed (3rd Wave)'
WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
(SELECT
qz.PROV_TIN
FROM
[SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz
where qz.Mailing = 'Amendment Mailed (4th Wave)'
and not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t with (nolock) where qz.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
and z.Hosp_Ind = 'P'
THEN 'Amendment Mailed (4th Wave)'
WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
(SELECT
qz.PROV_TIN
FROM
[SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz
where qz.Mailing = 'Amendment Mailed (5th Wave)'
and not exists (select * from dbo.sqs_objector_TINs t with (nolock) where qz.PROV_TIN = t.prov_tin))
and z.Hosp_Ind = 'P'
THEN 'Amendment Mailed (5th Wave)'
-- --**Top Objecting Systems**
WHEN z.SYSTEMNAME IN
('ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM','ASCENSION HEALTH ALLIANCE','AULTMAN HEALTH FOUNDATION')
THEN 'Top Objecting Systems'
WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
(SELECT
h.PROV_TAX_ID
FROM
#HIHO_Records h
INNER JOIN .dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking obj with (nolock)
ON h.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Top Objector'
WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID
OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
)and z.Hosp_Ind = 'H'
THEN 'Top Objecting Systems'
-- --**Other Objecting Hospitals**
WHEN (z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
(SELECT
h.PROV_TAX_ID
FROM
#HIHO_Records h
INNER JOIN .dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking obj with (nolock)
ON h.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Objector'
WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID
OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
)and z.Hosp_Ind = 'H')
THEN 'Other Objecting Hospitals'
-- --**Objecting Physicians**
WHEN (z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
(SELECT
obj.TIN
FROM .dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking obj with (nolock)
WHERE obj.[Objector?] in ('Objector','Top Objector')
and z.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
and z.Hosp_Ind = 'P')
THEN 'Objecting Physicians'
--****Rejecting Hospitals****
WHEN (z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
(SELECT
h.PROV_TAX_ID
FROM
#HIHO_Records h
INNER JOIN .dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking obj with (nolock)
ON h.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Rejector'
WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID
OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL
)and z.Hosp_Ind = 'H')
THEN 'Rejecting Hospitals'
--****Rejecting Physciains****
WHEN
(z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
(SELECT
obj.TIN
FROM .dbo.SQS_Provider_Tracking obj with (nolock)
WHERE z.PROV_TAX_ID = obj.TIN
AND obj.[Objector?] = 'Rejector')
and z.Hosp_Ind = 'P')
THEN 'REjecting Physicians'
----**********ALL OBJECTORS SHOULD HAVE BEEN BUCKETED AT THIS POINT IN THE QUERY**********
-- --**Non-Objecting Hospitals**
WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
(SELECT
h.PROV_TAX_ID
FROM
#HIHO_Records h
WHERE
(z.PROV_TAX_ID = h.PROV_TAX_ID)
OR h.SMG_ID IS NOT NULL)
and z.Hosp_Ind = 'H'
THEN 'Non-Objecting Hospitals'
-- **Outstanding Contracts for Review**
WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
(SELECT
qz.PROV_TIN
FROM
[SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz with (nolock)
where qz.Mailing = 'Non-Objecting Bilateral Physicians'
AND z.PROV_TAX_ID = qz.PROV_TIN)
Then 'Non-Objecting Bilateral Physicians'
When z.prov_tax_id in
(select
p.prov_tax_id
from dbo.SQS_CoC_Potential_Mail_List p with (nolock)
where p.amendmentrights <> 'Unilateral'
AND z.prov_tax_id = p.prov_tax_id)
THEN 'Non-Objecting Bilateral Physicians'
WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN
(SELECT
qz.PROV_TIN
FROM
[SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz
where qz.Mailing = 'More Research Needed'
AND qz.PROV_TIN = z.PROV_TAX_ID)
THEN 'More Research Needed'
WHEN z.PROV_TAX_ID IN (SELECT qz.PROV_TIN FROM [SQS_Mailed_TINs] qz with (nolock) where qz.Mailing = 'Objector' AND qz.PROV_TIN = z.PROV_TAX_ID)
THEN 'ERROR'
else 'Market Review/Preparing to Mail'
END AS [Updated Bucket]
,COALESCE(q.INDdesc, f.IND_desc) AS INDdesc
,f.Time_Period_for_Dispute
,f.Renew_Term_Ind
,f.Renewal_Date
,z.SMG_ID
,'' AS OrderedRank
INTO dbo.SQS_Bucketed_Details_SMG with (nolock)
From #SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG z
left join #F f ON f.PROV_TAX_ID = z.PROV_TAX_ID
AND z.SYSTEMNAME = f.SYSTEM_NAME
AND z.PROVIDERNAME = f.Provider
Left join #Q q ON z.PROV_TAX_ID = q.TIN
GROUP BY z.SYSTEMNAME
--,Z.[SubsystemName]
,z.PROVIDERNAME
,z.STATECODE
,z.PROV_TAX_ID
,z.SRC_PAR_CD
,q.INDdesc
,f.IND_Desc
,f.Time_Period_for_Dispute
,f.Renew_Term_Ind
,f.Renewal_Date
,z.SMG_ID
,z.Hosp_Ind
/************************** Drop temp tables*********************/
--DROP TABLE #SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG
--DROP TABLE #Q
--DROP TABLE #F
--DROP TABLE #HIHO_Records
--DROP TABLE #SQS_TINtoSystem
--DROP TABLE #SQS_EDW_SOURCE_WithSMG
--DROP TABLE #sqs_objector_TINs

RSPCM is taking long time

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for