[Running] Walk mode: Set / Detect lower tempo than 140 BPM

In the Running feature, I would love to see a "cool down" function for when I'm finished running and want to set a new slower tempo (e.g. 70-100 bpm range) with a simple tap, for walking and/or winding down. It seems there is no manual way to set tempo lower than 140 bpm, and when I exit and restart the Running feature, it seems unable to detect my walking tempo (it never sets a tempo, just stays in the detecting mode).
Requires detecting a slower walking tempo, and a button to launch into Walk mode.
Also can be used for Couch25k-style training that alternates between Run & Walk modes.

Updated: 2015-06-21Marked as new idea and edited the title slightly to make it easier to find via search. ;)

Similar Messages

  • At uni i need to run proxy on 'auto detect mode' but then at home/work this mode makes my internet browsing very slow. Can i do something about this without having to change settings everytime i change locations? running V3.6.8 on OSX

    At uni I need to run proxy on 'auto detect mode' but then at home/work this mode makes my internet browsing very slow. Can I do something about this without having to change settings every time I change locations? running V3.6.8 on OSX

    You can look at these extensions:
    *FoxyProxy: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/2464
    *QuickProxy: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/1557
    *SwitchProxy: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/125

  • Is it possible to detect low frequency signals with a high sampling rate?

    Hello everyone,
    I'm having an issue detecting low frequency signals with a high sampling rate.  Shouldn't I be able to detect the frequencies as long as the sampling rate is at least 2 times the highest frequency I will measure?  The frequency range I am measuring is 5-25 Hz, and I use Extract Single Tone.vi to measure the frequency.  The sampling setting I am using is 2 samples at 10 kHz.  Is there a method I can use to make this work?
    Attached is the vi.
    Attachments:
    frequencytest.vi ‏21 KB

    You are sampling at 10Ks/S, but only taking two samples. What do you expect to see? If your signals are binary (On or Off) you would only see either an on or an off, or if the rise/fall time was fast and you were Extremely lucky, one of each. If you want to see a waveform you have to sample for at least the period of a waveform. So you should take samples for at least 0.2 seconds to capture an entire waveform at 5Hz, ideally longer.   Think of looking at a tide change at a dock. If you want to see the entire tide change you will probably have to measure repeatedly over 24 hours, not just run out on the dock, measure the height twice and leave. That wouldn't tell you anything other than at that precise moment the tide height was X, but not that it was at high tide, low tide, in between, etc.
    I type too slowly, I see that a more technical answer has been given, so mine will be the philosophical one!
    Putnam
    Certified LabVIEW Developer
    Senior Test Engineer
    Currently using LV 6.1-LabVIEW 2012, RT8.5
    LabVIEW Champion

  • Since syncing with iCloud all my photos in my photo app are much lower resolution than they were before. Can anyone explain what happened an how I might get back my high resolution photos?

    Since syncing with iCloud all my photos in my photo app are much lower resolution than they were before. Can anyone explain what happened an how I might get back my high resolution photos?

    Thanks again.
    Unfortunately I don't have iPhoto (running Windows).
    I did, however, figure out a work-around.
    I created an empty directory on my computer, and told iTunes to "Sync Photos from..." that empty directory. This deleted all the photos from the iPod (go figure).
    I then set the "Sync Photos from..." dropdown back to directory that actually contained all my photos, and sync'd again.
    And, yes, they all loaded onto the iPod at their better, higher resolution.
    Thanks for all your help. Photos (and wallpaper) are perfect, again

  • IDVD 08 playing distorted in walk mode

    Hey Guys,
    I just bought iLIFE 08 tonight and I just installed it. I was looking through iDVD because I wanted to check out the new templates, and when ever I play them in walk mode, or in simulation, the playback is terrible. The audio and video is very choppy and it will not play fluid...any ideas? Thanks!

    OK, I tried out several of the iDVD 7 motion themes on an iMac much like yours. The motion menu animation (spinning record, etc.) seems a little slow - HOWEVER, the video clips that I insert in the menu drop zones runs at the proper speed.
    It's probably a matter of taste - the theme designed choose slower motion than we might choose, but as long as our video in the drop zones runs at the correct speed (and it DID for me) there shouldn't be a problem.
    BTW, the menu audio seemed OK.
    F Shippey

  • Easy way to schedule a job to run for a set period?

    Is there an easy way to schedule (dbms_scheduler) a job to run for a set period -say, half an hour- and then to stop.
    Currently, I schedule a procedure to do the work (a bunch of inserts or updates, say) and the first line of that procedure assigns sysdate to a variable when it starts. Then as the procedure loops through its work, I compare the current sysdate with that original one, and if the new sysdate>original one by more than 30 minutes, I raise an application error. But it's messy, and I was wondering if there was a nicer way of doing it?

    "Admin" -I think you'll find that 'end_time' merely states a time after which the job will not be run. It doesn't do anything to kill off a job which is already running at the time that comes round. Similarly, repeat_interval merely states how often the job should be run, not a time interval within which it must run and outside of which it must stop being run.
    Satish: your suggestion looks great. Do you have, or know of, any examples where that is used, though? The doco you pointed to says the parameter raises an event, but that it's up to my event handler to deal with it. I wouldn't have the first idea of how to deal with this in code myself. If I could see a simple example, it would help a lot! Unfortunately, that page doesn't contain such an example!

  • Photoshop Elements 11 Organizer: Full screen view of lower quality than with PSE 10 and before?!

    Upgrading from PSE 10 to 11, I noticed that when I watch my images with the organizer in PSE 11 in full screen view mode (F11), while the images load faster, they are shown in a lower quality than in PSE 10 or any other version of PSE that I owned before. In PSE 11, after the initial viewing in full screen (in the "fit screen" mode), when I click with the mouse on an image to display the "100%" view, there is a delay and the program says "Loading...", after which the 100% view in the full screen mode appears. When I then click another time with the mouse on the image to get back to "fit screen" mode, I get an image of better quality than during the initial view!
    So it seems like the program first gives a faster, but lower quality view of the image in full screen mode, and only after the user requests a 100% view, it actually loads the image with full detail, which is then preserved when going back to the "fit screen" view. This is a serious issue for me, because I also use PSE organizer to present my pictures to other people, and I don't want to show them some lower quality versions of my images, but the full quality ones, without having to first choose "100% view" and then go back to "fit screen".
    How can I make the PSE 11 organizer give me a full-quality full screen image right away, as this used to be the case in PSE10 and before?
    (I have both versions, PSE 11 and PSE 10, now on the same computer and tested this to confirm that the PSE 11 initial full screen view is of lower quality than the PSE 10 one. Also in PSE 10, there is practically no delay for displaying the "100%" view afterwards, indicating that the image was loaded with full detail right away.)

    - Update:
    * Adobe's senior support level has replied to me about this issue as follows:
    "Thank you for contacting Adobe.
    When you press the F11 button, Organizer 11 uses the Bicubic
    interpolation mainly because it is less processor intensive compared to
    Bicubic Sharper, and it helps to create the preview on the fly, rather
    than based on the thumbnail cache.
    When you zoom out from the 100% view, Elements Organizer uses Bicubic
    Sharper. This is because Bicubic Sharper is used for image reduction, so
    if the 100% view is larger than the available screen space, it will need
    to shrink. The Bicubic Sharper images may look more crisp however, Like
    any sharpening algorithm, Bicubic Sharper introduces halos and
    edge-enhancement artifacts. Those halos are typically slight, but any
    further sharpening (which you'll need when preparing an image for print,
    for example) will exaggerate them.This is expected behavior. The
    Organizer isn't great for determining exact quality, I recommend you to
    use Elements Editor for this purpose.
    Thank you,
    Bobby Johnson,
    Adobe Technical Support."
    * My reply on this to Adobe is:
    "Hello Bobby,
    thank you for your reply. Now at least we are talking about the same thing.
    Why I am wondering about the choice to use the "Bicubic" algorithm when pressing F11 in PSE 11 is that all previous versions of PSE that I owned (which spans from PSE 6 to PSE 10) did use the "Bicubic Sharper" algorithm right away when pressing F11. So apparently Adobe didn't worry about processor intensity of this algorithm then, and computers are getting all the time more powerful.
    It is true that in some situations, the "Bicubic Sharper" algorithm may introduce halos and edge-enhancement artifacts, as you write. On the other hand, especially on smaller resolution screens, the results of the "Bicubic Sharper" algorithm may look more crisp and lively, while the ones of the "Bicubic" algorithm may look more flat and lack fine detail. This is not only my personal opinion, but as I have brought up this topic in several forums, I can see that I am not alone here.
    So assuming that the question about preferring "Bicubic Sharper" or "Bicubic" as a default algorithm when pressing F11 is partly a matter of taste, and partly a matter of the hardware the user has available, why can Abobe not give the user an option to choose which one he/she would prefer? For instance, F11 gives full screen view with "Bicubic" applied, and CTRL+F11 with "Bicubic sharper"? Or make this an option in the preferences?
    As I am using the PSE organizer also to present pictures to other people (and I know many people who use it that way too), I would like to show them my pictures as sharp and detail-rich as possible. Therefore, I would highly appreciate an option as described above to be implemented in the PSE 11 organizer via an update. It should be fairly easy from a programming point of view, since both algorithms are already contained in the program anyway."
    * If you support this suggestion of mine as stated above, please also contact Adobe accordingly! The more support requests they get for this, the more likely it is that they will implement this update! You may mention my case number 0184046323 for reference.

  • Allow processing of Virtual Copies at lower resolutions than original RAW

    At times an original image is slightly soft, but looks just fine when processed at a lower resolution. In ACR the ability to do the RAW processing itself with a preview of the image rendered at a lower resolution than the original is most helpful in such situations. It would be fabulous if in LR it was possible to create a VC of a file that was set to a lower resolution than the original, e.g. 5Mpx from an 8.2MPx RAW image, with all processing and previews of that Virtual Copy then being displayed with a 100% zoom being the 5MPx image. Currently you have to guess what a downsized export might look like, or take it into Photoshop, for what might be a simple operation.

    This seems to be a very frequently requested feature, and fo rus it would certainly be the #1 missing functionality.
    We use Lightroom to work on large batches of event/wedding photographs, all taken in RAW format.
    1. With current 'absolute' presets, there's no telling what it will do to any given photograph: a "antique photograph" preset will do wildly different thing to a photograph under tungsten, as to a photograph under sunlight or fluorescent or flash.
    2. Similarly, our workflow is interrupted: instead of being able to colour/exposure correct all images and then apply a preset to this _fixed_, 'normalized' version, for consistency of look; we have to play with images one by one, or go to workarounds like export/import: all of which defeat the point of Lightroom as a workflow-enhancing app.

  • What am i supposed to do when my mac says it's in the not charging state and says that the battery is holding a significantly lower charge than normal?

    what am i supposed to do when my mac says it's in the not charging state and says that the battery is holding a significantly lower charge than normal?

    Go to the Apple in the upper left corner and select About This Mac, then click on More Info (and then System Report if you are running 10.7 Lion or 10.8 Mountain Lion), then select Power from the left hand column of the System Profiler. Copy and paste the Battery Information from the top of the page back here.

  • Oracle instance running on a system with low open file descriptor

    Hello.
    We have 10.1.0.4 on SuSE 9 on x86 64bit Sun servers.
    We have databases that if started manually come up without the warning, but if started via a shell script scheduled through a crontab start up with this warning: "Oracle instance running on a system with low open file descriptor".
    My understanding is that it has to do with OS ulimit. it appears that non-interactive shell (crontab) does not set the nofiles at 65536.
    All our system are set up exactly the same way. The problem is, though, that some systems do not report the warning even when started non-interactively.
    My question is this: assuming my nofiles ulimit is in fact too low on all systems, why would some systems report the warning and others would not? Is there anything database specific the instance looks for when it starts, such as the number of datafiles in the database, instance memory size, etc..., which would make the instance warn in some cases but not the others?
    Thank You
    Boris

    Thank You Satish.
    This is a good reference and we may end up looking into the patch bundle associated with the bug.
    But does anyone have any idea why the systems that are set up the same exact way would warn on systems and not on others?
    Also, the Metalink note talks about init.crsd. I have not build an association between this inconsistency and RAC.
    What I do see is that if we start up our database non-interactively (where ulimit -n resolves to 1024, instead of 65536) the warning is generated, in some cases.
    Perhaps, the 1024 is too low. But then my question is why would Oracle think it is too low only on some servers and not all?
    Boris

  • How to correctly set detection rules for date modified

    How are application detection rules for modified or created date calculated.  For example if I want the detection rule to use a file that was modified today or any day after today do I set it as Greater than or equal to or less then or equal to in
    the Detection rule?

    You would use Greater than Or Equal To. Greater than or equal to means that time or anything after. The latter would be that time or before
    Dustin Estes - MCP | www.dustinestes.com

  • Space Designer--no mode set

    I'm suddenly having problems with Space Designer and importing IRs. I've been using some for a while (the excellent Speakers and Telephones set), and they've always worked fine. Now when I load them the Space Des window says "no mode set" and no sound comes out. Sometimes it does say "mono" or "stereo" but still no sound comes out. The Logic IRs work fine. Any ideas?
    Thanks,
    -Jeff

    Hi Jeff,
    I recently had a problem on a client's machine where all his Space Designer IRs apparently went AWOL. I knew where they were but Logic didn't. I fixed it by putting an alias in:
    Macintosh HD > Library > Application Support > Logic
    which pointed to the location where the IRs were hiding. That fixed it, though I still don't know what caused it in the first place. I put that down to aliens abducting some of my electrons. A happening more common than the sceptics believe...
    Pete

  • Alias desktop folder icon lower resolution than original

    When I create an alias to a desktop folder its icon is of lower resolution than original.
    Even when I copy and paste from the respective get infos I get the same result. Any ideas?

    Back up all data to at least two different storage devices, if you haven't already done so. The backups can be made with Time Machine or with a mirroring tool such as "Carbon Copy Cloner." Preferably both.
    Boot into Recovery mode, launch Disk Utility, and erase the startup volume with the default options. This operation will destroy all data on the volume, so you had be better be sure of your backups. Quit Disk Utility and install OS X. When you reboot, you'll be prompted to go through the initial setup process. That’s when you transfer the data from one of your backups.
    Transfer only "Users" and "Settings" – not "Applications" or "Other files." Don't transfer the Guest account, if it was enabled on the old system.
    Reinstall your third-party software cautiously. Self-contained applications that install into the Applications folder by drag-and-drop or download from the App Store are safe. Anything that comes packaged as an installer or that prompts for an administrator password is suspect, and you must test thoroughly after reinstalling each such item to make sure you haven't restored the problem.

  • Continuous Shooting Mode Setting Download

    I use a Nikon D70 and shoot sports events on continuous shooting mode setting. Photos are in correct sequence when viewed on camera. When downloaded, photos are often out of sequence. Any suggestions as to how I might fix this problem? Thanks.

    Yes, the problem is the sub-second time. Since the D70 shoots at 3 fps, no wonder some files end up having exactly the same time, up to the second. It's not clear, though, why wouldn't Lightroom use the filename as the second sorting criteria — that would ensure correct order, since cameras are numbering the files sequentially.
    You have two options:
    Free — just sort by filename. Cameras number the files in the correct order, no matter if the time is the same.
    Cheap (99$) — update to Lightroom 2.3. Since v2, Lightroom retrieves the sub-second information from the files, and even if the fractions of seconds are not displayed in the Metadata panel, these are used for sorting. I am not sure all cameras record subsecond information in EXIF, but my own D70 does for sure.
    NOTE: If you'll be updating your catalog from v1 to v2, rather than importing the files in a fresh v2 catalog, you'll have to Save, then Read back Metadata for your D70 files, in order to ensure the subsecond information is actually read from files. That's because v1 didn't bother to read this info, so it's not there.

  • CPU Fan running really fast even at low temperature.

    I bought a HP Envy 700-160eo desktop computer 5 or 6 months ago and for the last 2 months the CPU fan has been running really fast even at low temperature. It's like locked to about 2400RPM as soon as I boot up my PC. Even if I get 30 degrees celcius it runs at 2600RPM. I've tried resetting my CMOS and tried updating my BIOS, but the BIOS update that you are providing me on the HP Envy 700-160eo driver & update section isn't compatible with my PC. The update is for 700-0xx. I've been using the program called Argus Monitor for controlling my fan speed.

    I've got the opposite problem, my AMD CPU is running around 55C and the fan hardly ever exceeds 1200 rpm most of the time its running around 950rpm.  I think the 48C to 65C is running on the edge of to hot in my opinion, I like to stay around 35C-40C. Motherboard, video card and hard drive all stay in the 30C range. I tried to speed the fan up with SpeedFan program but it can not interface.
    I hope someone can give us a answer, I checked the  UEFI and could not find any setting allowing controlling fan speeds on my ENVY 700-200z/AMD A10 cpu. 

Maybe you are looking for