Runtime Shared Assets and dynamic folder structures

I am using a CMS to load dynamic pages. Most of these pages
have Flash content. The content SWFs all reference a SWF that holds
shared library assets. The CMS undergoes periodic overhauls and the
content gets shuffled. This results in broken links to my shared
assets.
Does anyone know how to set the shared library URL at
runtime? Is this even possible?

Perhap you code is executing before the shared library assets are loaded. You need to debug and find out if the shared library asset(s) is loaded ahead.
Thanks.

Similar Messages

Sharing (Exporting) and keeping folder structure - possible?

I have been amassing a collection of family pictures going back into the 19th century. They are stored in iPhoto in folders by year (e.g. 1967 is a separate folder). I would like to export this as files but keep the folder structure so that relatives can just look in the 19xx folder for all the pictures from that year. Is there any way to export pictures and maintain the file structure used in iPhoto? If this doesn't work exporting original format photos is there any way to export from iPhoto and have it reflect that structure (so relatives on Mac or Windows machines can view/use them)?
TIA

Arthur,
I have not come across any applescript and I did just search again.
What I did come across was a program called iPhoto Album Extractor. It is really meant to extract albums into a folder from a damaged iPhoto Library that cannot be opened.
i downloaded it and tried it out to see if it would be a faster way to get your year albums exported. It is really quite fast.
Download the program and open it.
Choose the path by navigating to the iPhoto Library folder and choosing it.
Your albums will quickly be displayed in the left column.
Make a new folder on your desktop and label it albums.
Now highlight the album in the left column and choose "extract"
In the next window choose the folder on the desktop and then hit open.
The images in the album will be extracted/copied into a folder with the name of the album into that folder on the desktop. It is really quite fast. I did this while iPhoto was closed.
iPhoto Album Extractor
Lori

How do I move photos in a Smart Collection and keep folder structure?

HI there I am on a trial of Lightroom and loving it so far. One seemingly simple task I would like to try out is moving all my RAW files (which are all mixed up with JPGs and PSDs to a new location and keep the current folder structure.
Currently I have files strcutured like this: <main disk>\<year>\<month>\<filename>.cr2 and I would like to move these to <different disk>\<year>\<month>\<filename>.cr2
The Export functions look as if they will put them all in to one big folder? Any ideas?
Many thanks in advance.

There are several approaches to this problem. You could do this via the Folders panel in LR. You can do just about everything in the Folders panel that you can do in Explorer or Finder. Just create folder and drag and drop.
Another way is to do this outside LR use Explorer (Windows) or FInder (Mac). after you're done then go back into LR and tell LR where to find the moved files. Depending on how many you have this could be a bit tedious.
Another method is to choose the files you want then Export them as a Catalog. When you do this be sure to include the option to export the negatives. Point the new catalog at you other drive. It will recreate the folder structure during the export. Then remove the images from your present catalog. Don't delete from disk just remove. Now import from catalog and choose the newly exported catalog. This time choose the option to add the files without moving them. Once you are sure everything is back and is fine you can use Explorer or Finder to go into your original file structure and delete the files that were moved to the new drive. Be careful to only choose the moved files. If you are separating the RAWs out this should be relatively easy.
I hope that helps!

How to import files and convert folder structure to collections hierarchy?

My RAW files are organised on disc by date, e.g.
2013
01
02
etc
2014
01
02
etc
2015
01
2015-01-05 Family outing
2015-01-27 Walk along the Canal
etc
02
2015-02-01 Visiting granny
2015-02-05 Golf
2015-02-07 Skating competition
etc
I would like to batch import these into Lightroom (Lightroom CC) and have the folder structure above replicated in Collection Sets and Collections (i.e. one collection set for each year, and within each one have a collection set per month, and within that individual collections for the folders)
Is there a way to make this happen automatically?
Many thanks,
/alan

Hi.
Trash the iPhoto Library folder that you created on your Mac, or rename it "iPhoto Library damaged" if you may need some of its contents. Copy the iPhoto Library folder from the backup into your Pictures folder. Hold down the Option key as you launch iPhoto and select "Choose Library" from the dialog. Navigate to the good iPhoto Library folder and open. iPhoto should launch and open your library in exactly the same condition it was in when the backup was made. If all goes well you don't have to import anything.
If the library is still missing items, you can try a database rebuild. Hold Command and Option while you launch, select the first 3 options in the dialog, and rebuild. This can fix a library with a slightly damaged database.
If the library still isn't working you may have to create a new library (Option-Launch, select "Create") and import your Originals folder from the backup library. This will give you the pictures back without creating duplicates, but your albums and other items will not be recovered.
Regards.

Copy playlist to usb-stick and keep folder structure

Is there an easy way to copy a playlist from iTunes to a USB-stick (for use in the car)? The folder structure of artist > album> track should be kept.
If you simply use drag and drop, iTunes copies all songs into one folder.

"Files to Folder Scripts
This is a collection of two scripts: Alias Files to Folder... which creates an alias of each file of the selected iTunes tracks in a user-selected location, and Copy Files to Folder... which will copy the files of the selected iTunes tracks to a user-selected location."
It appears the first one just puts an alias in a single folder. The second one looks like it copies the files to a single folder which is pretty much what the OP is doing already with dragging.

Can I import and keep folder structure?

I have thousands of pics and videos. I'm willing to buy in to the whole iCloud experience (literally), but in my small experiments, I couldn't see how to import and KEEP the folders containing numerous pics. For example, if I have 1000s of FAMILY pics, TRAVEL pics, and FRIEND pics, all in separate folders. Can I import these pics (currently on Onedrive; I assume I can't import direct from Onedrive to iCloud.com?) keeping the separation and folder breakdown I worked so long to organize? Every attempt I've made, strips the folder and throws all pics in together. Yes, I know we can use clever tricks like geotags and dates to separate the photos to an extent. But most of my photos don't contain that metadata. And moreover, I've already manually done the work to my liking. Any ideas?

Import your folder structure to iPhoto, and then migrate the iPhoto Library to Photos.
iPhoto will create an event for each folder you import and name it like the folder. You can simply drag the whole folder structure onto the iPhoto icon.
When you open the iPhoto Library in Photos, Photos will create an album for each iPhoto event.

Difference between File Sharing, Dropbox, and Public Folder?

I have this MBP out front & my Mac Mini in back. I'm comparatively new to networking, altho I've used File Sharing (FS) & Dropbox (Db). It seems now, there are a myriad of ways to sync my two computers. (ICloud is also used, just for Mail & iCal, since those are the only two I have that Apple allows on iCloud. I have the computers networked w/ an Airport Extreme. That all works flawlessly.)
I'm aware of Apple's Drop Box, but it doesn't work since the two computers are over 30' apart.
The three subject features all do the same thing, I believe, so along with this question, I'm asking which of the 3 is preferable. Dropbox confuses me because it refers to the Public Folder, when it seems only necessary to drag a file to the Db folder, rather than the Public Folder. Anyone know where the Public Folder fits into the Db scheme of things? Or even into the FS scheme of things? Or even into the total file sharing/snycing landscape? My hunch is to ignore the Public Folder.
As to File Sharing, if I opt for this, then I don't need Db or the Public Folder. Right? The problem w/ FS is that both machines need to be up & running (and not in a Sleep mode). Also, FS is irrelevant when it comes to the Web. On top of all this, most apps come w/ the capability to upload files, photos, etc., for the Web. I'm in a situation where I need to keep track of what I'm sharing, whether it be through FS, Dropbox, or the Public Folder.
I would really like to simplify my workflow by settling on just one means of syncing my two computers. I'm aware that Db is good for sharing files not only between my 2 Macs, but putting stuff on the Web.
How do some of you share data between computers? What do you go with? All 3, 2, or just one? How do you keep things straight?

I'm aware of Apple's Drop Box...
You mean AirDrop.
The three subject features all do the same thing, I believe...
No, they're entirely different.
File Sharing is a file service that works over a local network.
Dropbox, which I've never used, is a cloud-based storage and file-synchronization service.
The Public Folder is the subfolder of your home folder that's accessible to other users of the same computer, and also to other users on the network if File Sharing is active. (The term "Public Folder" may have another meaning in the context of Dropbox.)
How do some of you share data between computers?
There are many ways to do that, in addition to the ones you mentioned. It's not really clear what your requirements are.

Adding namespace server and replicating folder structure

Not sure if this is the correct forum. @mod, please redirect if applicable.
When adding a second or subsequent Namespace server to a DFS Root, how is the virtual folderstructure replicated when that server is added?
The folder-targets are stored in AD under the System container. However, folders (to create a sensible hierarchy) are not stored in AD. Where do they come from when a new Namespace server is added ?
Regards, Marcel

To answer your first question go to the link below.
Overview of DFS Replication:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc771058.aspx
As for your second question review the answer below.
Stand-alone and domain-based DFS namespace servers store DFS-related information in the registry. All namespace servers also store a copy of the namespace structure on a local volume on the server in DFS root folders and link folders as follows.
Does this answer your questions?
Reference used:
DFS Namespaces: Frequently Asked Questions
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee404780(v=ws.10).aspx

Shared members and dynamic calc

I am trying to replicate a new cube from current GL cube and wish to remove unused shared members if they have any impact on essbase.
2/3 of my accounts (dense) member is stored with the remainder being shared members. Shared members do not add to block size. But having so many of them, does it impact on calc scripts or retrievals or any other impacts?
Secondly, in accounts and divisions, we have four levels. except for level 0, the remaining levels are all dynamic calc. Division is sparse member. Its not advisable to have dynamic calc on dense dimension. What about sparse dimension like division? Will it be better to change level 2&3 to dynamic and change level 1 to store as well?
We have also been advised by our consultant to change accounts to sparse dimension considering the number of times we need to update outline for new members (stored and shared).
Dimension          Type          Stored     Shared
Measure               Dense     1378     796     rest
Time               Dense     106     13     rest
Year               Dense     9     8
Currency          Sparse     12     9
Scenario          Sparse     41     38
Market               Sparse     20     12
Division          Sparse     490     302     rest
Product               Sparse     635     308
Reportcode          Sparse     327     299

Hi,
Having shared members in dense hierarchy will not have much of impact on Cube size or retrieval performance.
but its always advisable to avoid unnecessary hierarchies (shared or stored or dynamic).
Having top level dense members as dynamic lines is a good design but having sparse dynamic calc will impact retrieval performance.
its not at all advisable to make sparse members as dynamic calc but if needed we can make sparse members with very few children as dynamic calc (or dynamic calc & store). yet again its not advisable to have a dynamic calc children to a sparse stored parent as this will affect the batch calculation while aggregating parent sparse member.
And as suggested by your consultant it is feasible to make the dimension getting modified more often, as a sparse dimension as this will reduce the restructuring time (sparse restructure will take less time compared to dens restructure).
But that alone cannot be considered as factor as there are many other factors to be considered for making a dimension sparse.
- Krish

Iphoto6 and directory (folder structures)

Okay - I have been searching the support docs but haven't found a direct answer to this...
When I moved from PC to Mac and imported my digital images (8000+) to iphoto, it completely wrecked my organization. I had everything organized by directory structure, which iphoto basically disregarded. that was just a month ago and since then iphoto6 has come out.
If I reimport with iphoto6, will it honor my existing directory structure? I thought it might since there is now a setting under preferences for "Copy files to iphoto folder library when adding to Library".
Any info anyone can offer would be appreciated!
Thanks!

grangerc:
Welcome to the Apple Discussions. If you want to maintain your originals in their current folder system you can do so by setting iPhoto to not copy your photo files into it's folder system. Instead iPhoto will created an alias link to the original file in your folder system. Each folder in your system will be "imported" into iPhoto as a roll. You can then use albums and folders in the Source window at left to further organize them if you'd like.
To create a library of this nature have your original files on your boot drive in the location of your choice. Then remove your current iPhoto Library folder to the Trash (don't delete as yet). Now launch iPhoto 6 and when it says it can't find your library choose to create a new one.
Now with iPhoto open go to your folder system in the Finder and begin dragging them folder by folder, or several at a time, into the open iPhoto window. They become rolls in iPhoto. You may find that the roll date seems arbitrary. That's because iPhoto will use one of the modified dates from the files in that folder for the roll. That can be changed by clicking on the roll icon and going to the Info window at the bottom of the Source window and changing the date of the roll manually. That will position the roll in the lists at that date point.
I've created a 1 6,600+ library that way form my original photos on a second internal drive. This way I only have to have one full set of original files, thus saving 20G or more. Good luck.

Multimapping and dynamic folder selection for files

Hi SDNers,
I have a requirement where I need to split the message in multiple messages, I am using 1:N Multimapping for this.
Also I need to use dynamic configuration to route the separated files to multiple folders based on place field in the message.
When I am using Dynamic configuration the splitted files are all getting created in one directory instead of multiple directories.
The requirement is that if place field has value india then the file having value as INDIA should be placed in folder INDIA, if place is UK then that file should be placed in folder UK
Can anyone please help me on how to achieve this?
Regards,
Gautam Purohit

As far as I know this is not possible, since bulk message will be delivered to Adapter Frame Work (AFW). AFW delegates each message from bulk message.
Try using Variable substitution, but I am not sure if it works.
May be you need a BPM to achieve this. But this will cause performance.
Regards,
Praveen Gujjeti.
Edited by: Praveen Gujjeti on Apr 6, 2010 8:11 PM

Installing/deploying CS4 and dynamic Folder location

I've utilsed the admin tool to create the install and uninstall xml files for a CS$ deployment. I found that it static to be installed from a network location, could this be changed to have it pushed as a deployment of MDT or CA DISM?
I would like to push it as a package, silent install, supress prompts for registration, updates, ect.. within a dynamic location or package.
Right now, I've pulled info from online and got too the point where the back returns error code 7.. then fails.
I have another test package pointing to a network share and ot works fine. Any ideas?
Thank you,

Ok. Here is what I found. On windows, the factions file is
~ /AppData/Roaming/Adobe/Photoshop/8.0/Adobe Photoshop CS Settings/Actions Palette.psp.lnk
WTF? Anyway, I copied the file to ~/Desktop, fired up CS6 and extracted all of the contained actions set.
The command
find ~/AppData/ -name "*.psp*"
will work to find the settings file on Windows (in a unix shell like cygwin).
The command
find ~/Library/ -name "*.psp*"
Should work on OS X.

Time Machine Folder Structure

I am using external HDD to backup my MBP 15, iMac, MBA 13 and the folder structure (of the external HD) looks like this
I am also using Time Capsule to backup two Mac Mini but the folder structure looks like this
Why the two folder structure are different? Why there is no individual folder according to the date for time machine backup for the two Mac Mini that is backup vi Time Capsule? Is this the intended result?

The answer would be that Time Machine backs up differently to a drive that is connected directly to Mac versus a shared drive....the Time Capsule in your case....which is connected to the network.
Backups to a network drive like the Time Capsule are located in a special container called a sparsebundle file.
If you open up the sparse bundle file and drill down a few levels, you will the same type of Backups.backudb folder that you see on the drive connected directly to the Mac.

How do i get my folder structure in Lightroom to replicate my hard drive folder structure?

My issues is that post-import from Aperture, my folder structure in Lightroom does not match my folder structure on my hard-drive. In particular, rather than be structured as in my hard-drive:
2015 (folder)
-> 2015-01-30 (sub folder)
-> 2015-02-15 (sub folder)
-> 2015-03-03 (sub folder)
All of the photo folders are listed individually as:
2015-01-30
2015-02-15
2015-03-03
In addition, a number of folders have been created in the form 01a2a201aff9c8c684928629ea41221c0fa5930ab7 where no folder exists on my hard drive in this form and the image contains the right date meta data.
As I've got photos dating back to 2005 and a lot of different days taking photos, this is making the folders view unmanageable.
I completed the Aperture migration in two stages (as i did not have sufficient space to replicate images in move across to Lightroom)
1. Moved Aperture original images from being References to Managed (with the file structure above)
2. Then used the Lightroom plug in to import the library from Aperture (which has successfully copied across meta data and my folder structure + edits from Aperture)
Does anyone know how to fix this issue? In particular:
1) Adding in 2015 folder level to structure?
2) Removing all off the 01a2a201aff9c8c684928629ea41221c0fa5930ab7 folders?
Many thanks in advance,
Joe

In the "folders" pane, right-click on the folder you see and select "show parent folder". Repeat as needed.

Building a war file with a folder structure

How do a build a war file with a folder structure? I have code that creates JarEntrys and writes jar files and resource files etc. to the war. When I look at the war that gets created using winzip the path names for all the entries are correct and everything appears correct. When I try to deploy this to Tomcat nothing deploys. It appears my war is in a folder structure. How can a build this folder structure in the war? When I look at a good war using BeyondCompare I see folders and files in the folders just like I would see looking at a directory on my system. When I use BeyondCompare to view one of my "bad" war files that I have created everything is in the root. There are no folders and no folder structure. I am using the java.util.jar API to create the war but I don't see any methods or any API that will let me build up any sort of folder structure. It seems like I am missing something basic here.

command is same for creating jar/war/ear.
u simply need to execute jar /? for detail.

Runtime Shared Assets and dynamic folder structures

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for