Sale order costing in Retail Business

Dear Experts,
We are supporting Retaill based clinet and also that same client using IS RETAIL ECC6.0. Now client is doing retail business as well as S&D also. Business needs that they want to see sale order costing for every trading goods ,which same sold to external customers through S&D customers.
1. Is it possible to get sale order wise costing for retail trading article (HAWA) type.
2.How can i make cost sheet for trading goods
3.How can i share or apportion palnned cost to sale order
Please support this appreciate and pls.forward user docs and customization settings for sale order costing.
Best Rgds
Suma

I think you put this in the wrong forum

Similar Messages

  • Sale order costing for Trading goods

    Dear Experts,
    My client having retail industry.Client used to sold customers also like outwright customers direct sales not through retail stores. Now business would like to check margin agasinst one sale order through costing. My SAP working enviornment is IS Retail ECC6.0.
    1. Is it possible to do sale order costing for trading goods.(Goods p[urchased for all stores not particular customer)
    2.Wihtour BOM is it possible?
    3.Please forward any user docs ,if possible that costing
    Costing sheet like this
    1.Trading goods
    2.Packaging materila
    3.Overheads.Planned
    Beat Rgds
    Suma

    Answerd with Condition type

  • Sales order cost estimate with GIT account

    Hi,
    Business introduced Goods - in - Transit (Balance sheet account), so PGI will always post to GIT and Invoice it will get reversed.
    For one of the Configuratble material (MTO) scenario we need the Sales order cost estimate to get the Planned cost.
    When i try to execute the sales order cost estimate it says cost element doesnot exist for GIT GL (WHich is right).
    But with maintaining the GIT how to achieve the sales order cost estimate.
    I tried to create CE category 90 for GIT, in Cost estimate am getting error CE 90 not supported for Cost estimate.
    Kindly help this is kind of urgent req for us
    Thanks,
    Sudha

    Hello Ashley
    Yes, if you have done your settings correctly, especially Requirements class set up  (see the documentation link),  then the cost estimate will flow to a condition type in Pricing, usually EK01/EK02 conditions. These conditions are used to calculate sales prices (PR00) in cost-plus (mark-up) scenarios.
    Link: http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/90/ba6da4446711d189420000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
    However Profit margin  as calculated in a sales order comes from VPRS condition  (which is based in Material Master) and is the difference of net value and VPRS condition value in normal circumstance.
    Hope other more knowledgeable experts will weigh in.

  • Sales order cost objective vs OKB9  Internal order cost object.

    Hi All,
    we facing an  issue with sales order cost objective vs OKB9 cost object.
    For IC PO service material, we assigned account assignment category 4.Reasonis Service material was not showing on G\R account.
    The G\L account 7898788, we assigned to Service Item (material type DIEN)  , for G\Cost 7898788 cost element is assigned in OKB9. Combination business + order 3478787.
    Now conflict with sales order cost objective vs OKB9  internal order cost object.
    While posting intercompany IR posting system thronging below error messageu2026
    Enter only one true account assignment
    Message no. KI249
    Diagnosis
    You made assignments to several objects in CO (cost center, order, project etc.). 2 of these have been created as true objects.
    System Response
    You are allowed only one account assignment for each cost-relevant account
    How to resolve this issue.. Do I make any config changes in the system to overcome this issue?
    Or any sub account to assin in VKOA config for internal orderu2026
    Regards,
    Adi

    Hi Waman,
    Thanks for your inputs.
    Issue :  IR failed to post for wax  Sales Order -> ICPO  - Error:  Enter only one true account assignmentu2019.
    Background:
    Original setup  in  Test system   & Productionu2013 account determination for servive (DIEN) account assignment category u20184u2019 was linked to G/L Account  34444444, As part of project orange u2019, account determination was linked to account u201889710100u2019.
    Account u20188970100u2019   34444444 was replaced with 8970100 ,is not linked to any cost center & always post with reference to IC Sales Order as per config in OKB9 based on company code (US99) + cost element (89701100) + business area (9yyy). This caused a conflict while posting IR, system could not determine exact order for posting financial value.
    Conflict:  Actual Sales Order 34789343 is  linked to PO via account assignment category & IC dummy sales order (8014331) is determine via config setting. Two cost objects cannot be linked to one IR G/L account booking.
    Regards,
    Adi

  • Sale order costing process : Help required

    Hello All,
    Belatted Happy New Year 2011 to all.
    I have a question related to Sale Order Costing. It goes like this,
    My client is into Pipe coating business who receives the pipe from the customers, coats it as per there requirements and despatches it thereon. There is no concept of FG here as its only the service he is doing on it and also when he receives the pipe there is no raw material cost on it. Raw materials for him would be chemicals etc which he uses to coat the pipe.
    And also this demands variant configuration from SD and PP angel.
    As this scenario is customer specific, it demands Sale Order based costing(Sale order cost estimate).
    My doubt is, how the sale order costing process goes with.
    In general scenarios, Make to stock, we use production order based costing where standard cost estimate is calculated for planned cost and actuals are incurred on PO settling the variance to COPA
    Similarly how the costing goes with if Sale order cost estimate is used. What i think is, here instead of Standard cost estimate for plan, we will go with Sale order cost estimate at sale order level, and incur actual cost at production order and settle the cost of Production order to Sale order. Correct me if i am wrong, and request you ppl there to explain me the process of costing in the scenario said above.
    apart from that, my client wants the flexibility to change the cost estimate at quotation level.
    Please suggest me with solution explaining the process of costing here.
    Thanks in advance,
    Ravi Kumar

    Hi Ravi
    Your understanding of the scenario is very much right...
    In your case, you need to have sales order as cost object...
    Process
    Your stock would be non valuated stock, because the FG is not your stock.. You are just doing a service
    Based on the characteristics chosen in the Sales orders, system would determine the Sales order BOM
    Based on sales order BOM, Sales order cost estimate would be calculated....
    You would receive the Customer pipe in your stock against the sales order... It would be a non valuated GR... You can track the Qty only
    Sales order would trigger a production order... The prod order can have its planned cost, which is only for information sake
    The Customer Pipe, Chemicals would be issued to prod order to coat the pipe... And also Labor/machine hrs may be confirmed
    There after your production order would be settled on Sales order
    Then you would do PGI (Post Goods Isue).. This will not trigger any accounting doc
    Then you do billing... The sales revenue would be posted on the sales order
    Then you settle the sales order to COPA.. This will close the cycle
    Configuration
    The IMG Settings required would be as below
    1. You would use account assignment category (AAC) E
    2. Create a Requirement class with
    a. AAC = E.... (Means sales order is CO Object)
    b. Valuation Indicator = BLANK (Means Non Valuated Stock)
    c. Costing ID/Costing Method = As per your choice to calculate the Sales order cost estimate
    3. Assign this req class to Requirement Type
    4. Give this req type to your PP/SD team.. They would assign it to Strategy group / Item Category to determine it in the sales order
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Flow material product cost to sales order cost and no explosion of structur

    Hello,
    We have a business requirement - Business is currently performing product costing at material on monthly basis using quantity structure (with help of avaiable bom and routings). Material costing nicely gives the cost with clear split of material cost, labour cost, external cost etc. Then at sales order level we want to do the preliminary sales order costing. The reason for sales order planned costing is, we are performing result analysis revenue based by comparing planned cost. Business is saying, we already calculated the material cost, labour cost at the product level and same should be as it is transferred to the sales order planned cost and we just want to add the overheads.
    The cost already calculated should directly pass to sales order and the order should not explode the BOMs again or try to find activity prices from routings. Then with the already available values of material, labour costs, system should only add the overheads via costing sheet.
    The cost compenent structure exploded in material should be passed to sales order and not just the total cost.
    There are several reasons I believe sap should not allow this behaviour. I seek your inputs to validate the same.

    THIS SHOULD BE POSSIBLE WITH "TRANSFER STRATEGIES" - TCODE OKKM.
    GO BY THE BELOW GIVEN PATH AND TRY.
    READ IMG DOCUMENTATION FIRST, THEN TRY.

  • Non Valuated - Sales order costing

    Hello All,
    We are planning to use Non Valuated - Sales order costing for our client. My understanding is as follows :-
    1. Production order is automatically created from Sales order created (for ex item 010 - Material X) : Production order 1
    2. Sub- production order is also created if there is material Y , in the BoM of Material X & needs production : Production order 2 (linked to Production order 1).
    3. When GR is done on any on these production orders - no FI entry is posted.
    4. On settlement value of Production order 2 is settled in Production order 1.
    5. Further Production order 1 value is flow to Sales order line item 010
    6. Revenue is generated from Sales order for this item, when Invoice is posted. Still not COGS for delivery.
    7. And only on settlement of this Sales order : FI posting is done for COGS.
    Please let me know whether my understanding is correct point wise. Thanks
    Now I have few questions to clarify, in above example :-
    1. Generally these are new product (Material X) hence no standard cost is available for them. When does the cost estimate happens in such scenario. Is it when the first GR of material will happen ? When do I start see this cost estimate in Sales order.
    2. Till the time Production order 2 & 1 are not settled ... Do we see WIP at the production order level when we run WIP calcualtion for production orders ?
    3. What about the variances ? I have read variance calculation is not possible. Can you please elaborate why & what is avilable other than that ?
    Thanks in advance for reading a long query

    Hi Rajeshwari
    1. If you use ABC - Then COGS split wont be available
    2. Main diff between Valuated and Non val stock - Is once you produce and till you sell, the stock will appear in your balance sheet....
    Non Val shud be chosen whe you make a material completely customized to the needs of a customer and the time lag between mfg and sale is very less....
    If above two are not the case, then stock must be non valuated
    3. Implementing the same template or introducing Val Sales order stock depends on the business needs.... The criteria to decide shud be based on (2) above
    Also, if the new business where you are implementing now is the same as the existing business which is using non valuated stock, then you shud stick to the same template
    4. Sales order cost estimate gets created during creation of SO, using the costing variant specified in req class... Not created during GR
    5. Sales order costing does not make sense during Non Val Stock.... Unit Costing or prel costing you use during val Stock
    Unit costing means you dont want to maintain a BOM... And you specify the components during sales order costing
    6. I dont think you can settle prod order 2 to SDI.. You can try to change the settlement rule... In my opinion, you can not do it
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Sales order costing release not possible due to Goods in transti account

    Hi,
    Business introduced Goods - in - Transit (Balance sheet account), so PGI will always post to GIT and Invoice it will get reversed.
    For one of the Configuratble material (MTO) scenario we need the Sales order cost estimate to get the Planned cost.
    When i try to execute the sales order cost estimate it says cost element doesnot exist for GIT GL (WHich is right).
    But with maintaining the GIT how to achieve the sales order cost estimate.
    Can you please help me in this regards.
    Thanks,
    Sudha

    Hi Ajay,
    I have created GIT (B/S) account with CE category 90.
    but in sales order cost estimate getting message " inconsistancy in CE category" CE category 90 is not accetable it should be either 01/02
    can you please help to move forward on sales order cost estimate with GIT account
    Thanks,
    sudha

  • Open Balance on Sales Order Cost Report

    Hi SAP Group -
    I have a couple questions about the settlement of manufacturing variance to COPA.
    When our settlement process is complete (production order and sales order both settled to COPA), there is a balance remaining on the sales order cost report which is equal to the manufacturing variance on the production order.
    It seems that the manufacturing variance is posting from the production order to the sales order, but is not being assigned to the PSEG and flowing to COPA.
    I am looking for advice in two areas:
    First, how do we "clear" these balances on old orders that are already settled?
    Second, how do we prevent this from happening on future orders?
    Thanks !!!

    Refer to OSS 183250 and note 186485.
    If you don’t specify in the settlement profile for the production order that the variances are not transferred from the production order into CO-PA, you will settle the variances to <b>CO-PA twice</b>: once from the production order (broken down into variance categories), and once from the sales order item. The settlement rule still references the material and not the sales order item.
    Special Features of Product Cost by Sales Order with Valuated Sales Order Stock
    <a href="http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/90/ba66cc446711d189420000e829fbbd/content.htm">Read the topic on 'Special Features of Product Cost by Sales Order with Valuated Sales Order Stock'</a>
    You may want to check the period of the variance settlement from mfg order to sales order and ensure the settlement of sales order is also done the same period, if the type is PER.

  • User Exit or BADI on saving of Sales order cost estimate (CK51N)

    Hi,
    Can any one share with me what are the User Exit or BADI that gets triggered on saving of Sales order cost estimate (CK51N).
    Regards,
    Bijay

    Hi
    Check the link
    Need Enhancement Spot or BADI for transaction ck51n
    Regards
    Sanil

  • Sales Order Cost Estimates -- Versions?

    In our MTS plant we are creating cost estimates each month with different version numbers so they can easily be compared to review cost changes.
    This concept in our MTO plant is (of course) a problem.
    We would like to create a dummy sales order and on each line list a KMAT and build an "average" configuration.  We use variant config, so the sales order bom is built automatically.  It also costs automatically.  We would like to save this cost estimate and compare it with a cost estimate of the same configuration next month.   I do not have an option for version CK51n, nor do I see a Costing Date in KEKO table.  Either of these items for MTS would create a second cost estimat and allow comparison.
    Is there a way to compare Sale Order Cost Estimates across periods?
    Any other suggestions as to how to obtain the required data??
    Thank you for all suggestions!!

    Any one think of a solution?
    thanks

  • Sales order cost estimate

    hi,
    While saving the sales order cost estimate its getting the GL account from GBB-ZG0.
    as we assigned Balance sheet account its asking the cost element.
    can you please explain what is link to get the gl from GBB-ZGO, can we change this to pick from GBB-VBR.
    Thanks,
    Sudha

    Hi,
    Are you are working with unvaluated special stock ?  In this case, the system is looking for a consumption account via the account assignment category. For example if you are using requirement class ZPJ which uses account assignment category Q. In account assignment Q, you entered account modification VBR. Therefore, the system is looking for an account via the keys GBB / VBR.
    regards
    Waman

  • Sales order cost estimate not happening because of GIT B/S account

    Hi,
    Requirement is to have Goods in Transit account in PGI and reverse it in Invoice no issues iwth it.
    For the same sales order user wants to get cost using sales order cost estimate.
    When i run that am getting following error
    Item 00001 : Cost element 14001212 does not exist in CO area 0010 for 10/07/2011
    Message no. KK689
    Even though i maintain the CE for Balance sheet account with Cost element category 90 its not accpeting.
    Can you please help me on how to proceed for sales order cost estimate.
    Thanks,
    sudha

    hi,
    if you give a balance sheet account in obyc , you will not be able to create a cost elementin category 01 , accordignly system will give error in sales order costing , as its not able to get correct cost element in cost planning.
    if your requirement is just to post  cogs to a balance sheet account which is goods in transit and when invoice is done cogs to be posted.
    you should actually use  revenue based RA functionality on sales order instead of assinging a balance sheet account in obyc.
    in this approach;
    - first assign a p/l account in obyc and create cost element in cateogry 01.
    - create revenue based RA and assign RA key in requirement class.
    - in OKG8 for RA category  WIPR and your ra key assign , goods in transit account and give a offsetting account which is not cost element (credit entry in offsetting account nullify debit in account given in OBYC when GIT is posted , when billing is done system will automatically post a oppsite entry in both account).
    -in OKG8 for RA category COSR give the COGS account and a offsetting account without cost element (credit entry in offsetting account nullify debit in account given in OBYC when COGS is posted).
    regards
    rajesh

  • Plan value(break up) not appearing in sales order cost report

    hi
    I have done sales order bom in cs61,operation in ca01,in va02 for sales order costing in itemization showing like
    material 100
    actity      10
    total 110
    saved and if I see in cost report it show only revenue , cogs(110),but it is not show raw materials and operations.
    please advise me what to do?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Nagesh

    Dear Nagesh,
    Probably, you need to check the status of the BOM and the Routing in the Header. It should be active/released.
    Kind Regards
    Umapathi G
    Edited by: Umapathi Naidu G on Aug 11, 2011 3:26 PM

  • Sales order Cost- Report

    Hi,
    I have an issue in MCTG. For some sales offices the value of Orders: Cost is showing as zero and for some sales offices the report is showing value.
    Why is it so?Any known reasons?
    Also is there any standard report which will show sales orders cost per sales organisation for a particular period?
    Regards,
    Ajit

    Hi Rajkumar,
    Analyse the report and read the documentation. It is not possible for sap also to give all in one report.
    Regards,
    Madhu.

Maybe you are looking for