SC Workflow not updating standard field

Hi,
I am using SRM 5.0 .After approval of SC which have multiple item not updating standard field of source_ind to all the line items .
It's getting updated in only first line item .
Recent Package : SAP_ABA SAPKA70011
Thanks ,
Sachin

Hi,
DO you mean to tell that after the shopping cart is approved , only the first item is send to the sourcing cockpit?
ANd the other items of the shopping cart are not send to the sourcing cockpit?
Can you please compare the category for the two lines? is it the same?
can you check wether the category mentioned for the second line has got category which has been configured for sourcing cockpit?

Similar Messages

DYNP_VALUES_UPDATE not Updating the Field on my Dynpro

Hi.
I want to create a dynpro where two fields are. Field 1 allows the user to enter a customer number, field two shall come up with a number that is calculated somehow. The calculation can last up to 20 seconds, so I dont want to make the user waite for this number.. .he shall be able to work with the rest of the dynpro.
Therefore I called the function that does the calcuiation like that:
MODULE user_command_0100 INPUT.
DATA: lv_guid_16 TYPE guid_16.
IF kna1-kunnr IS NOT INITIAL AND kna1-kunnr <> gv_kunnr
    CALL FUNCTION 'GUID_CREATE'
      IMPORTING
        ev_guid_16 = lv_guid_16.
    gv_taskid = lv_guid_16+8(8).
    CALL FUNCTION 'YDETERMINE_DEPOTDISTANCE'
      STARTING NEW TASK gv_taskid
      PERFORMING receive_depent ON END OF TASK
      EXPORTING
        i_kunnr = kna1-kunnr.
ENDIF.
ENDMODULE.
The next piece of code shall get the returning value if the function wants to return its results.
FORM receive_depent USING i_task TYPE clike.
TABLES: d020s.
DATA: dyname LIKE d020s-prog,
        dynumb LIKE d020s-dnum.
DATA: BEGIN OF dynpfields OCCURS 1.
          INCLUDE STRUCTURE dynpread.
DATA: END OF dynpfields.
IF i_task = gv_taskid.
    RECEIVE RESULTS FROM FUNCTION 'YDETERMINE_DEPOTDISTANCE'
    IMPORTING
      e_depent         = kna1-yydepent
      e_accuracy       = gv_accuracy.
    MOVE 'KNA1-YYDEPENT' TO dynpfields-fieldname.
    MOVE kna1-yydepent TO dynpfields-fieldvalue.
    APPEND dynpfields.
    dyname = sy-cprog.
    dynumb = '0100'.
    CALL FUNCTION 'DYNP_VALUES_UPDATE'
      EXPORTING
        dyname               = dyname
        dynumb               = dynumb
      TABLES
        dynpfields           = dynpfields
      EXCEPTIONS
        invalid_abapworkarea = 01
        invalid_dynprofield = 02
        invalid_dynproname   = 03
        invalid_dynpronummer = 04
        invalid_request      = 05
        no_fielddescription = 06
        undefind_error       = 07.
    ASSERT sy-subrc = 0.
ENDIF.
Problem is: The DYNP_VALUES_UPDATE does not update the field on my dynpro at all. If I hit enter another time, then the field is provided by the value as another PBO will be processed. What is my mistake here?
Regards
Manfred
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Oct 29, 2010 12:07 PM

Hi Manfred,
Replace all the DYNP_VALUES_UPDATE-related content by the following statement:
SET USER-COMMAND 'xxx'.
While DYNP_VALUES_UPDATE does update the fields, a roundtrip is not triggered so the content of the fields will not be refreshed. The SET USER-COMMAND does that.
Hope this helps you!
Cheers, Roel

Ap_vendor_pub_pkg.update_vendor_site API is not updating a field

Hello
I want to update the Calculate Tax field on the supplier site level.
I am using the ap_vendor_pub_pkg.update_vendor_site API to update the ap_supplier_sites_all.auto_tax_calc_flag field. But the API does not update the field. I want to change the value of the auto_tax_calc_flag from 'L' or 'N' to 'Y'
I am running the API as a concurrent request. Thus the org_id should be set when you use the relevant responsibility
Below is my code. Am I missing a parameter? The API does complete successfully. The ap_supplier_sites_all table does show as updated when you look at the last_update_date field. But the auto_tax_calc_flag value does not change
Any ideas why the api is not updating
create or replace procedure apps3_mtnaol.mtn_update_supp_sites(errbuf in out varchar2, retcode in out number) is
v_error_message varchar2(3000);
l_vendor_site_rec ap_vendor_pub_pkg.r_vendor_site_rec_type;
l_return_status varchar2(1000);
l_msg_count number;
l_msg_data varchar2(2000);
l_msg_dummy varchar2(3000);
l_output varchar2(3000);
l_vendor_name varchar2(3000);
l_vendor_number varchar2(3000);
l_vendor_site_code varchar2(3000);
v_vendor_site_code varchar2(3000);
v_vendor_site_id number;
v_party_site_id number;
l_remmitance_email varchar2(2000);
v_party_id number;
v_party_site_name varchar2(3000);
v_ext_payee_rec iby_disbursement_setup_pub.external_payee_rec_type;
cursor c_1
is
select segment1
,vendor_name
,vendor_id
--,vendor_site_id --vendor_site_id from org_id 22970
,vendor_site_code
,vendor_type_lookup_code
,org_id
,party_id
,party_site_id
from mtn_supplier_site_22970
where 1 = 1
and segment1 = '661699';
begin
for rec in c_1 loop
select assa.vendor_site_id -- get vendor_site_id from org_id 5001
,assa.party_site_id
into v_vendor_site_id
,v_party_site_id
from ap_supplier_sites_all assa
where 1=1
and org_id = 5001
and assa.vendor_id = rec.vendor_id
and vendor_site_code = rec.vendor_site_code;
select party_id
,party_site_name
into v_party_id
,v_party_site_name
from hz_party_sites
where 1=1
and party_site_id = v_party_site_id;
fnd_msg_pub.delete_msg(null);
fnd_msg_pub.initialize();
l_return_status := '';
l_msg_count := '';
l_msg_data := '';
l_vendor_site_rec.vendor_site_code := rec.vendor_site_code;
l_vendor_site_rec.auto_tax_calc_flag := 'Y'; --calculate_tax field that needs to be set to Yes
l_vendor_site_rec.org_id := 5001;
l_vendor_site_rec.vendor_id := rec.vendor_id;
l_vendor_site_rec.party_site_id := v_party_site_id;
l_vendor_site_rec.party_site_name := v_party_site_name;
v_ext_payee_rec.payee_party_id := v_party_id;
v_ext_payee_rec.supplier_site_id := v_vendor_site_id;
v_ext_payee_rec.payee_party_site_id := v_party_site_id;
v_ext_payee_rec.payer_org_id := 5001;
ap_vendor_pub_pkg.update_vendor_site(p_api_version => 1.0,
p_init_msg_list => fnd_api.g_true,
p_commit => fnd_api.g_true,
p_validation_level => fnd_api.g_valid_level_full,
x_return_status => l_return_status,
x_msg_count => l_msg_count,
x_msg_data => l_msg_data,
p_vendor_site_rec => l_vendor_site_rec,
p_vendor_site_id => v_vendor_site_id
l_output := '';
if l_return_status <> 'S' then
for i in 1..l_msg_count loop
fnd_msg_pub.get(i, fnd_api.g_false, l_msg_data, l_msg_dummy);
l_output := l_output || (to_char(i) ||': '|| substr(l_msg_data,1,250));
fnd_file.put_line(fnd_file.output, 'Unsuccessful Update:'||l_return_status||': '||l_msg_count||', '||l_output);
fnd_file.put_line(fnd_file.output, 'Vendor Number: ' ||l_vendor_number);
fnd_file.put_line(fnd_file.output, 'Vendor Name: ' ||l_vendor_name);
fnd_file.put_line(fnd_file.output, 'Vendor Site Code: ' ||l_vendor_site_code);
fnd_file.put_line(fnd_file.output, 'Calculate Tax: ' ||l_vendor_site_rec.auto_tax_calc_flag);
end loop;
else
fnd_file.put_line(fnd_file.output, 'Successful Update:' ||l_return_status||': '||l_msg_count||', '||l_output);
fnd_file.put_line(fnd_file.output, 'Vendor Number: ' ||l_vendor_number);
fnd_file.put_line(fnd_file.output, 'Vendor Name: ' ||l_vendor_name);
fnd_file.put_line(fnd_file.output, 'Vendor Site Code: ' ||l_vendor_site_code);
fnd_file.put_line(fnd_file.output, 'Calculate Tax: ' ||l_vendor_site_rec.auto_tax_calc_flag);
end if;
commit;
end loop;
exception when others then v_error_message:= 'Other error: ' || SQLERRM;
fnd_file.put_line(fnd_file.output, 'Error Message: '||v_error_message);
fnd_file.put_line(fnd_file.log,'***************************************************************************');
fnd_file.put_line(fnd_file.log, 'Other error: ' || SQLERRM);
fnd_file.put_line(fnd_file.log,'***************************************************************************');
end;
/

Yes the API works outside my code.
I have used this exact same API to successfully update other fields on the ap_supplier_sites_all table like hold_unmatched_invoices_flag, match_option, pay_group_lookup_code, pay_date_basis_lookup_code, and always_take_disc_flag fields

Work order should not update the fields in PR

Hi Gurus
My requirements is that workorder should not updates the purchasing data fields in PR do not go to the shoping cart. How can make it possible.
Thanks in Advance

Hi,
I am not sure of your requirement clearly but check up the below user exits :-
COZF0001 Change purchase req. for externally processed operation
COZF0002 Change purchase req. for externally procured component
or BADI :- IWO1_PREQ_BADI BAdI for Manipulation of P.Reqs from Orders + Networks ,SE18
regrds
pushpa

DYNP_VALUES_UPDATE not updating SCREEN FIELD PERNAM

Following code not working. screen field pernam not getting updated. pls advise.
tables:zmara ,DFIES.
PARAMETER: pmatnr LIKE zmara-matnr,
           pernam like zmara-ernam.
AT SELECTION-SCREEN ON PMATNR.
perform p2.
FORM P2.
*****READ
DATA: SCREEN_VALUES TYPE TABLE OF DYNPREAD ,
      SCREEN_VALUE   LIKE LINE OF SCREEN_VALUES.
DATA: MATNR1 LIKE ZMARA-MATNR,
      ERNAM1 LIKE ZMARA-ERNAM.
SCREEN_VALUE-FIELDNAME = 'PMATNR' .             " Field to be read
APPEND SCREEN_VALUE TO SCREEN_VALUES. " Fill the table
CALL FUNCTION 'DYNP_VALUES_READ'
       EXPORTING
            DYNAME                   = SY-CPROG
            DYNUMB                   = SY-DYNNR
            TRANSLATE_TO_UPPER       = 'X'
       TABLES
            DYNPFIELDS               = SCREEN_VALUES.
read TABLE SCREEN_VALUES INDEX 1 INTO SCREEN_VALUE.
MATNR1 = SCREEN_VALUE-FIELDVALUE.
*OVERLAY MATNR1 WITH '000000000000000000'.
*SHIFT MATNR1 RIGHT DELETING TRAILING SPACE.
UNPACK MATNR1 TO MATNR1.
SELECT ERNAM FROM ZMARA INTO ERNAM1 WHERE MATNR = MATNR1.
ENDSELECT.
*message ERNAM1 TYPE 'I'.
**********UPDATE
CLEAR SCREEN_VALUES[].
CLEAR SCREEN_VALUE.
SCREEN_VALUE-FIELDNAME = 'PERNAM' .             " Field to be read
SCREEN_VALUE-FIELDVALUE = ERNAM1.
APPEND SCREEN_VALUE TO SCREEN_VALUES. " Fill the table
CLEAR SCREEN_VALUE.
CALL FUNCTION 'DYNP_VALUES_UPDATE'
       EXPORTING
            DYNAME                   = sy-CPROG
            DYNUMB                   = SY-DYNNR
       TABLES
            DYNPFIELDS               = SCREEN_VALUES.
loop at screen_values into screen_value.
message SCREEN_VALUE-FIELDVALUE TYPE 'I'.
ENDLOOP.
ENDFORM.
Moderator Message: Put a little more effort from your end. Did you check in Debugger?
Edited by: kishan P on Mar 30, 2011 12:21 PM

Hi Manfred,
Replace all the DYNP_VALUES_UPDATE-related content by the following statement:
SET USER-COMMAND 'xxx'.
While DYNP_VALUES_UPDATE does update the fields, a roundtrip is not triggered so the content of the fields will not be refreshed. The SET USER-COMMAND does that.
Hope this helps you!
Cheers, Roel

Having a problem using Workflow to update a field based on ZIP code

I created a Workflow to update a Yes/No picklist called eligibility based on a Text (Short) field called Applicant ZIP code.
It's set to update on the Opportunity page:
Before modified record saved
And the value function is:
IIf(InStr("60601_60602",[<stApplicant_Zip_Code_ITAG>|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/]+)>0,"Yes","No")+
That was a guess of how to try it while relying on my limited MS SQL & Access knowledge.
It does work correctly using what I did. The problem I have is that I actually need to choose from over 600 ZIP codes. The function window only allows for 256 characters. (And I suspect my way is fairly inelegant for search a multi-thousand character string.)
Any suggestions?

I created a Workflow to update a Yes/No picklist called eligibility based on a Text (Short) field called Applicant ZIP code.
It's set to update on the Opportunity page:
Before modified record saved
And the value function is:
IIf(InStr("60601_60602",[<stApplicant_Zip_Code_ITAG>|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/]+)>0,"Yes","No")+
That was a guess of how to try it while relying on my limited MS SQL & Access knowledge.
It does work correctly using what I did. The problem I have is that I actually need to choose from over 600 ZIP codes. The function window only allows for 256 characters. (And I suspect my way is fairly inelegant for search a multi-thousand character string.)
Any suggestions?

Timebased workflow to update Status field

Hi,
Our requirement is to set status to 'Closed' after 15 days of opening an SR. Please let me know if any of you addressed similar requirement.
Thanks in advance!
m

A new feature in R18 allows you to update a field through Workflow after waiting for a certain period I guess that should help you
Regards,
Deepak

SharePoint 2013 Workflow Not Updating on Deployment

Developing a 2013 Workflow on SharePoint 2013 using Visual Studio 2012, deploying workflow changes does not update the workflow that runs. This has already been posted on the SP 2013 dev forum, but I wanted to check here with the workflow folks. Anyone run
into this issue before and/or have tips for solving?
Thanks.
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sharepointdevelopment/thread/cd543a00-f3ab-4a4a-8682-b81d8330b677
http://blog.randomdust.com

This issue is reported and I'll post about it once I have an update. For now to workaround this issue, you can try these steps
Change the default deployment option to “No Activation”
Retract the solution using Visual Studio
Deploy the solution. This time feature will not be activated by default as we have changed to “No Activation”
Open the SharePoint designer and click on the “Workflow” section. You will see your workflow already present there. Delete the workflow which you have created.
Activate the feature manually.
Now you should see your updated version.
Chandrasekar Natarajan

SPD workflow not updating a Lookup Column

I have a 2 lists (Computers & Lending Library) that both have a look-up column (Item Status) pointing to a 3rd list (Item Status - Category).
Both lists are properly looking up when manually edited via the web interface. When I try to use a SPD workflow to "Update or Create List Item" and I set the column in the Lending Library (Item Status) = Current Item (Items Status) the column is not populated.
I took the same value and updated a Text column and the value is "0".
The strange thing is when setting the (Item Status) it only gives me the options:
As Integer
Lookup ID (as Integer)
Lookup Value (as Integer)
What am I missing?
Stunpals - Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties.

Its been a long time since I looked at this but yes we did figure it out.
Here is my Comment to myself on the lookup: "Must extract the [Item type] as a string and then lookup the corresponding List Item [ID] in the "Item Type - Category" list, use that value to update the "LendLib"[Item
Type]."
As suggested you need to reference the ID of the lookup, and I am caching that. Then when setting the [Item Type] column, by referencing the [ID] column in the Lookup list, then set your value to the Title of that lookup.
If I recall the issue was the lookup, if you don't use the [ID] then you don't actually retrieve the value from the [Title] column correctly.
My screenshots below are a bit confusing at first because my Lookup List is called "Item Type - Category" and the column in the 2nd list that is the
Lookup Column, is called "Item Type".
Stunpals - Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties.

BAPI not updating Z-fields while creating PR

Hi all,
I am creatting PR using BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE, PR was created and std fields uppdated but some customer data z-fields hasbeen added to the screen and i am passing these fields using BAPI structure but these z-fields remains blank. Below is the code kindly suggest what's going wrong.
zfield structure
PREQ_ITEM     NUMC     5     0
Zfield1                     CHAR     40      0
Zfield1            CHAR     30     0
Zfield1          CHAR     1     0
Zfield1          CHAR     1     0
Zfield1          CHAR     1     0
Zfield1          CHAR     1     0
Zfield1          CHAR     255     0
Zfield1          CHAR     255     0
*******Code***********
data : BAPI_TE_MEREQITEM type BAPI_TE_MEREQITEM.
data : BAPI_TE_MEREQITEMX type BAPI_TE_MEREQITEMX.
BAPI_TE_MEREQITEM-PREQ_ITEM = '10'.
BAPI_TE_MEREQITEM-Zfield1 = 'TEST'.
BAPI_TE_MEREQITEM-Zfield2 = '999999999'.
BAPI_TE_MEREQITEM-field3 = 'N'.
BAPI_TE_MEREQITEM-field4 = 'N'.
BAPI_TE_MEREQITEM-field5 = 'N'.
BAPI_TE_MEREQITEM-field6 = 'N'.
BAPI_TE_MEREQITEM-field7 = 'DRI PLANT'.
BAPI_TE_MEREQITEM-field8 = 'From IT'.
   move 'BAPI_TE_MEREQITEM' to extensionin-structure.
extensionin-VALUEPART1 = BAPI_TE_MEREQITEM+0(240).
extensionin-VALUEPART2 = BAPI_TE_MEREQITEM+240(239).
extensionin-VALUEPART3 = BAPI_TE_MEREQITEM+480(109).
append extensionin.
BAPI_TE_MEREQITEMX-PREQ_ITEM = '10'.
BAPI_TE_MEREQITEMX-field1 = 'X'.
BAPI_TE_MEREQITEMX-field2 = 'X'.
BAPI_TE_MEREQITEMX-field3 = 'X'.
BAPI_TE_MEREQITEMX-field4 = 'X'.
BAPI_TE_MEREQITEMX-field5 = 'X'.
BAPI_TE_MEREQITEMX-field6 = 'X'.
BAPI_TE_MEREQITEMX-field7 = 'X'.
BAPI_TE_MEREQITEMX-field8 = 'X'.
    move 'BAPI_TE_MEREQITEMX' to extensionin-structure.
append extensionin.
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE'
           IMPORTING
             number                   = prno
            TABLES
                 requisition_items    = requisition_items
      requisition_account_assignment   = requisition_account_assignment
           return                     = i_return
           EXTENSIONIN               = EXTENSIONIN.

Hello,
before calling Commit FM please try using FM ZZG05_BUPA_EVENT_DSAVB and then commit the changes.
or
Use the Function Module CRMXIF_PARTNER_SAVE. You can update or create standard and newly created fields(EEWB).
The following FM updates all the customer fields.
Please let me know if you face any issues.
Thanks & Regards,
Ravi Aswani

BADI MB_MIGO_BADI not updating custom field in MSEG Table

Dear Experts,
I am working on screen exit In MIGO transaction for transfer Posting.
I checked that BADI MB_MIGO_BADI having facility for screen exit and method line_modify having facility to change GOITEM Structure for the changed line item.
Now, to make this functionality work I have enhanced include structure CI_COBL which is available in both mseg table and goitem structure, now I have this customized fields on my custome tab through the enhancement and also to update this value 2 custom fields created in goitem structure and MSEG table through include structure CI_COBL.
Here my question is at the time of transfer posing creation in MIGO when I am passing the value in custom fields through screen and assigning it to custom fields of structure GOITEM through LINE_MODIFY method, it is giving me below worning message
BADI: Field GOITEM-ZZIDNLF is not ready for input. (Change is not taken over)
Now I have debuged the code, also checkout many threads and came to know that because of few checks in standred program (iNCLUDE:LMIGOKL3) these fields will not be updated WHERE IT always checks whether these fields are ready for input or not and if not ready then instead of assigning the values it throws worning message.
Now can you please through some light how can I go ahead as I have check out many threads and also tried to change value of cs_goitem structure using field symbol but throughing dump that it is blocked against changes through field symbol.
The helpful answers will be highly appriciated.

Hi,
In the badi mentioned by you GOITEM is the importing parameters & if the relevant field is not used in any MIGO screen you cannot change the data.
Please check example BADI interface: IF_EX_MB_MIGO_BADI~LINE_MODIFY
Please check the BADI documentation:
Changed data in GOITEM is only adopted if the relevant fields are visible and ready for input.
Changed data in GOITEM is not adopted if the relevant field is not used in any MIGO screen (warning via MIGO 049).
Changed data in GOITEM is not adopted if the relevant fields are not ready for input (warning via MIGO 050)
Thanks and Regards,
Chandra

Workflow not updated in offline approval

Hi All-
I have an issue in offline approval in SRM 7.0 . Program- /SAPSRM/OFFLINEAPPROVALSEND has been scheduled to send email for offline approval and approver receives the mail. When the approver clicks on Approve By Email button, a new email opens with some Guid informations and approver clicks on send button to send the mail.
I am seeing the inbound mail recived by SAP in SOIN -tcode or via In Utilities-Inbox Overview in SCOT. The problem is, the workitem is still in ready status and not changed to complete status.
I havent scheduled the inbound program- /SAPSRM/OFFLINEAPPROVALGET as per SAP library and other SDN posts. I have maintained the following in SCOT (Under Settings-> Inbound processing)
Internet mail xxxx@ xxx.com ( Mail id) ICS /SAPSRM/CL_OFFLINEAPP_INBOUND 3.
My doubt is, do we need to schedule the inbound program or any other program, so SAP will decode the data and update the workflow? or is it enough to maintain the above SCOT settings?
Please clarify above things and help me on how to update the workflow
Vinoth

Thank you Ricardo and Saravanan. I am working on this and waiting for roles to assign. In the mean time, i have scheduled the prog- /SAPSRM/OFFLINEAPPROVALGET and if i approve from outlook, it is updating the status to WF.
Is there any issue, if i use this inbound program in SRM 7.0?
Also, when i approve from outlook, the mail contents (GUID and other technical informations) is in editable mode. As per my client, it should be in disable mode, so the approver will not change the mail contents. I am not able to find the solution for this. Please provide your inputs.
PS: I am using Application Controlled WF
Vinoth

When-Remove-Record, does not update header field

i have master-detail form and in that there is a DB field eh_amount, which takes it value from
the computed non-db summary field m_amount
my E_head
eh_code
eh_no
eh_amount
my E_detail (tabular with 5 records displayed)
ed_eh_code
ed_eh_no
ed_amount
m_amount <---summary column (summing ed_amount)
whenever i enter/update ed_amount , m_amount get computed properly.
i have WVI trigger written where i store eh_amount := m_amount
i have also written When-remove-record on e_datail block, where i again re-initialize
eh_amount := m_amount
the detail record gets deleted and m_amount gets updated,
but the header eh_amount does not show the updated value of m_amount.
Kindly suggest to me as to where the change has to happen.

Hi Craig..
I am using form6i, db 10g.
I am not doing summation myself. My m_amount field is calculated field set at design time.
Summary detail block is E_detail and summary field is ed_amount.
Only after saving form, the new value for eh_amount is seen.
what i want is eh_amount should be seen updated, if while entering i delete any detail record.
in when-remove-record i am storing m_amount in eh_amount, but the new value of eh_amount
is visible only after saving the form and not when any record is deleted.

Workflow not updated or refreshed from BPM changes

Hi all,
My BPM Workflow seem to be stuck. All changes I make to my BPM (adding steps etc..) are not reflected in the Workflow.
I've refreshed the Cache several times (Deltas and Full)...
Activated Cache Notifications that were not started yet...
Manually Activated the BPM with SXI_CACHE
Re-activated BPM itself offcourse after each change///
..all to no avail..
Anyone any ideas ??
Cheers,
Eric

If u have made any changes in IP recently, then delete it from ID and reimport it.
Regards,
Prateek

Want to update standard field in ME21N/ ME22N

Hi All,
I have a requirement to block all the line item of the standard PO if any of the line item does not satisfy specific condition (as per the requirement). But I am not able to do so.
I have tried to use the BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST~PROCESS_ITEM. But, here it is not possible to block all the line item(s) if any of the specific line item fails the condition check. So, can any body help me to find the way out.
Thanks--
Debojit.

Hi,
Thanks for ur reply. But, I have a requirement to block all the line item(s) of the PO if any of the line item(s) does not satisfy the specific condition checking.
Also, I have to put the error message in the message log, but how can I block (set LOEKZ = 'S') every line items of a PO in this case?
Thanks -
Debojit.

SC Workflow not updating standard field

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for