Settled but not posted

Is there any T-code or standard report which can find the list of transaction which are settled, but not posted?
I tried TPM20, but only those were posted is listed

please check if you selected only relevant area (-s) for you, e.g. if you need a list of contracts settled but not posted, then mark 'issue no messages' in all non-relevant areas, like in a screenshot attached.
/Renatas

Similar Messages

  • Work order to cost center settlement does not post to GL module (FI)

    Dear Expert,
    I find the Maintenance Work order to cost center settlement does not post to GL module (FI)?Also, the settlement cost element is primary element define in GL chart of account.
    When an maintenance order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the work order value posted cost center and  the value is display in cost center report but not post to GL module in FI.As I notice only good issue or receive to/from work order is posted in GL but not the settlement of work order.Why?
    Between, Kindly advise what are the report or T-code to view the maintenance order is done the settlement and what are the value is settle for maintenance work order?
    Kindly advice under what circumstance when maintenance work order to cost center settlement is posted to GL(FI module)?
    Please advice.
    Thank you.
    KH

    Hi Kiran,
    The error message clearly says that "Cost Center validity starts from 01.10.2014" i.e. in the future period.
    Change the cost center from period in the past date and try.
    BR, Srinivas Salpala

  • Excise Invoices Captured but not posted.

    Hi,
    How can I see the list of all excise invoices that are captured but not posted. Also list of excise invoices that are cancelled.
    Regards
    Ayyallas

    Hi Ayyallas,
    Have you tried transaction J2IUN and using the button "Display pending invoice".
    You might also be able to see this in table J_1IEXCHDR with field STATUS.
    Hope this helps,
    Adam.

  • Sap treasury flow is due before accrual/deferral key date, but not posted

    Hi,
    I run TBB1 - posted business transactions - all transactions posted
    when i run the tbb4 for product type 51a i got the following error
    sap treasury flow is due before accrual/deferral key date, but not posted
    Please see the image

    Hello, Krishna.
    You haven't posted flow types 1150.
    Please go to your transaction, select "Cash flow" tab, Choose layout "106 Posting view", select flow type 1150 (one from your first screenshot above - use flow type and date) and check "Posting status" field - what's inside (please, provide screenshot)?
    NA T2104
    Short Text
    Flow is due before accrual/deferral key date, but not posted
    Diagnosis
    The corresponding flow is due before the accrual/deferral key date, but has not yet been posted; this may result in the incorrect amount of expenses or revenues being displayed in financial accounting.
    System Response
    The flow is treated by the accrual/deferral function as if were already posted, i.e. the related expenses or revenues are accrued/deferred, where appropriate.
    Procedure
    Post the flow to correct the amounts of expenses or revenues shown in financial accounting.

  • What is the Impact of just parking invoice doc's, but not posting...

    I would like to know the risk/constrain involved with the below process, which may not be a standard practice.
    1. Service Provider maintains Classic SRM/ECC. Customer maintains own ECC.
    2. Shopping cart created in SRM and PO generated in ECC of Service provider.
    3. PO transferred to Customer ECC. Invoice posting, Payment and FI activities are carried out in customer ECC.
    4. Basic Invoice Information is transferred back to Service provider ECC, so this invoice will be shown as follow on document in the shopping cart. It will show only the invoice number and it is only for the informational purpose. There is neither finance activity nor any reporting are made out that system.
    Service provider just want to Park the document and not to post it, so it won't hit the GL account. This eliminates considerable work FI configuration settings.
    Question is whether this unorthodox method of just parking, but not posting will cause any impact/risk, even though no FI activities is carried on that system.

    Hi,
    'the invoice number and it is only for the informational purpose' and 'In future if we are planning to use any reporting from service provider', in this case of cause there will be a problem.
    But, what Service provider going to do with Parked doc? In future if they're going to post it?I mean if they are have accounts payable why they don't post it?

  • Impact of just parking invoice doc, but not posting???

    I would like to know the risk/constrain involved with the below process, which may not be a standard practice.
    1. Service Provider maintains Classic SRM/ECC. Customer maintains own ECC.
    2. Shopping cart created in SRM and PO generated in ECC of Service provider.
    3. PO transferred to Customer ECC. Invoice posting, Payment and FI activities are carried out in customer ECC.
    4. Basic Invoice Information is transferred back to Service provider ECC, so this invoice will be shown as follow on document in the shopping cart. It will show only the invoice number and it is only for the informational purpose. There is neither finance activity nor any reporting are made out that system.
    Service provider just want to Park the document and not to post it, so it won't hit the GL account. This eliminates considerable work FI configuration settings.
    Question is whether this unorthodox method of just parking, but not posting will cause any impact/risk, even though no FI activities is carried on that system.

    It is not a normal practice and does not fulfill the intent of the park process but as long as you have controls around preventing those parked documents from being posted this should probably work.
    Consider them to be a little akin to delivery accruals that are never matched to an invoice, my thoughts are you might want to HOLD rather than PARK these documents.
    You will also need to consider what your long term housekeeping and archiving strategy will be for these essentially orphaned documents.

  • AFAR test run showing the values but not posting in Real run.

    Hi Friends,
    i have an issue with AFAR recalculating the depreclation. The details are as below;
    1. Asset value date is 15.07.2010. but ordinary dep. start date was set as 01.01.2010 manually by the user.
    2. The Period control method 11, the dep. is calculated for entire year for acquisition.
    3. we have already calculated depreciation from period 12 2010 to period 04, 2011.
    4. Now, we have changed ordinary depreciation start date for 5 asset records from 01.01.2010 to 15.07.2010.
    5. Therefore, we recalculated AFAR for these assets for 2010 and test run is showing the values for these 5 asset. The same was expected by the business.
    6. When we execute the real run, it is not posting and no change in asset explorer for period 12, 2010 or in current period. No error message is available in spool / job log.
    We have opened FI periods as well.
    My question is  that why the system calculating the values in test run and if it is calculated in test run, why it is not posting in update run?
    As per the period control method, the depreciation should not recalculated for half year even we change the ordinary dep,start date from 1st Jan to 15th July.
    I  request you to clarify my doubt and help me to understand the error which is stoping the values in update run of AFAR.
    Best Regards,
    Padmaja

    Hi,
    Sorry...it is not worked out. Alternatively, i tried the shift factor with variable depreciation and i achieved the values which appeared in AFAR test run.
    Thanks for the help.
    Regards,
    Padmaja
    Edited by: PadmajaCH on May 19, 2011 3:26 PM

  • FF67 problem, can't change statement date(statement saved but not post)

    I need to change the statement date of a bankstatement. I did not post the statement yet.
    I used a wrong statement date, and I want to change it, but I saved it after booking the second screen(the one with the
    statement items)
    When I look by Manual Bank Statement Overview I see the bankstatement, but it has no Posting complete remark yet, because it has not been postefdofcourse.
    The problem is I can't change the statement date, because when I try to Post then the systems gives an error because it does not accept the new statement date I want to use.
    Is there a way to solve this problem? The statement has not been posted yet, so I suprised I can't change the statement date.
    Anyway I hope somebody can help me out.

    I had to post them first because otherwise it looks I could not delete the statement.
    I saw no Id with only saving, that's why I post them. then the statement got an id.
    What do I have to choose to make it possible to delete statements, not posted yet.
    I guess I have to select something else because I did not see any Id to choose.
    I do a manual input of the bankstatements (no import).
    Whst's the best I can do now?  What do you mean with FI?
    I guess I can do a manual booking on the three(send/receive and general) bankaccounts to get the right position of the accounts?
    The bankstatements are ok(booked with ff67) only the three accounts I mention above have the wrong position.

  • Success but not Posted Process Scheduler

    Hi all,
    I just installed HCM 9.1 PT8.52, Demo DB, Oracle 11g Database and Windows server 2008.
    I installed and configured the process scheduler (followed the steps) and created a windows service for it, that is 'Automatically started'.
    When trying to run a process scheduler, I'm getting a run status 'Success' but the 'Distribution Status' is 'Not Posted'.
    I suppose it is not finding the location or something?
    What should I check?
    Thanks.
    Bechara

    Thank you!
    The ReportDistAdmin role was missing so I added it.
    I shut down process scheduler and re-run it, but I'm still getting 'Not Posted'
    Is there any additional step to do before trying the reports?
    Update
    And the password was missing in the default local node, I added it and it worked!
    Thanks you Hakan!
    Edited by: Bechara IS on Nov 8, 2012 3:39 AM

  • Depreciation planned but not posted.

    Hi all,
    There is the following case.
    In asset explorer there is planned depreciation which is not posted for prior year. I want to erase this planned depreciation (is incorrect) in prior year without affecting G/L. Could you please advise?
    If this is to be made with ABSO and specific transaction type, could you please tell me setup of the transaction type?
    Best Regards,
    Kyriakos

    Dear Kyriakos,
    is this prior year closed in FI-AA already? If so, how were you able to close this fiscal year? This should be found as error by the fiscal year close report.
    If the prior fiscal year is not closed, then you can either change the depreciation key to a non-calculating one (e.g. 0000) or set a shutdown indicator for the complete fiscal year. This should reduce the planned depreciation to zero. No posting or G/L entry is necessary therefor.
    If the prior fiscal year should be already closed in FI-AA (still I would be wondering how you did that), you could use the solution provided in [SAP Note 29694|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/29694].
    Hope this helps,
    Markus

  • Manual depreciation and Planned but not posted depreciation forwarded

    HI Expert,
    We would like to request for Product Enhancement for Fixed Asset Module due to the inconsistency in the computation for the following:
    u2022     The planned and un-posted depreciation is already considered as confirm transaction when they compute for the accumulated depreciation to be forwarded next year (as well as net book value beg for next year)
    u2022     But as for the no of months (remaining life) u2013 it will only consider the no of posted months when they compute for remaining life of the asset
    The current feature of SAP affecting our enhancement request is as follows
    1) Manual depreciation is currently validates manual depreciation based on Planned depreciation instead of Posted depreciation
    2) Remaining life computation for next year depreciation is based on posted transaction only
    3) When user wants to fully depreciate the asset, we cannot post depreciation based on remaining un-posted depreciation using manual depreciation
    Based on this feature we want to request for the following enhancement
    1) For the remaining un-posted depreciation (especially if the previous year is already close), we should be able to choose which month we want to post the un-posted depreciation
    2) Since the remaining life computation is based on posted depreciation only, 1) the validation and 2) the net book value forwarded next year should also be based on posted depreciation
    We have a sample computation based on current feature VS the suggested computation for SAP. Is there any way for us to import the file here at the forum? We will wait for your advice
    Regards,
    Amy

    Dear Kyriakos,
    is this prior year closed in FI-AA already? If so, how were you able to close this fiscal year? This should be found as error by the fiscal year close report.
    If the prior fiscal year is not closed, then you can either change the depreciation key to a non-calculating one (e.g. 0000) or set a shutdown indicator for the complete fiscal year. This should reduce the planned depreciation to zero. No posting or G/L entry is necessary therefor.
    If the prior fiscal year should be already closed in FI-AA (still I would be wondering how you did that), you could use the solution provided in [SAP Note 29694|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/29694].
    Hope this helps,
    Markus

  • Mt940 uploaded but not posting

    Hi Experts,
    I have successfully uploaded a MT940 (SAP structured format) using ff_5 but posting is not happening. What could be the reason and how to resolve it?
    Thanks,
    Surajit

    Hi All,
    Thanks for the responses received so far. After importing the MT940, if I go back, I get the following message ---
    "While importing electronic bank statement, the system determ
    that not all external transactions (business transaction cod
    text keys, or posting texts) were in
    table T028G.
    Enter the transactions in table T028G.
    Afterwards, start the processing again.
    Following entries missing in table T028G:
    TransTyp External transaction        +- Bank Key        Bank Account       Shrt key St no MR no
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745     3
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745     4
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745     5
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745     6
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501           413788  5745     7
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745     8
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745     9
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    10
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501           413788  5745    11
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    12
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    13
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    14
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    15
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    16
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    17
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    18
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    19
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    20
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    21
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    22
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    23
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    24
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    25
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    26
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    27
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    29
    MT940    /PT                         +  242000          30039501            413788  5745    32
    MT940    /PT                         -  242000          30039501            413788  5745     1
    MT940    /PT                         -  242000          30039501           413788  5745     2
    MT940    /PT                         -  242000          30039501            413788  5745    28
    MT940    /PT                         -  242000          30039501            413788  5745    30
    MT940    /PT                         -  242000          30039501            413788  5745    31

  • KKAO: Production order settled but not appeared in

    Hi expert,
    KKAO will calculate WIP only for the open orders where the order status is not fully delivered. And in FS10N we find entries related to WIP postings resulting from KKAO transaction processed during monthend.
    Process works as below:
    Say one order is with partially delivered status as of monthend:
    1. KKAO during month end wil result in below entry:
    WIP A/c (B/S A/c) Dr
    Change in WIP A/c (PL A/c) Cr
    2. When the production order is fully confirmed in next period, entry wil be:
    FG Inventory A/c Dr
    Cost of Goods Manufactured Cr
    3. When you process KKAO during monthend, earlier WIP calculation entry will be reversed as below since the production order is fully confirmed:
    Change in WIP Dr
    WIP Cr
    But in some orders i have observed that while we run KKAO it is not creating all above entry in accounts records.How is it possible.Pl advise.
    Regards,
    Samar

    Hi gurus,
    Thanks for the reply.
    The ststus is : "  REL  MSPT CNF  DLV  PRC  CSER BCRQ CAPP*  " of said production order
    Pl advise
    Regards,
    Samar

  • Dr. has lab results but not posted on HealthVault.

    My doctor had my lab results (LabCorp) last week but they aren't posted on HealthVault yet.  I cannot find a number or email to inquire about what the delay is!  Can anyone steer me in the right direction or has anyone else had this issue?

    Hi Eliza,
    If you are still having issues accessing your lab please contact our support team and they will work with your directly to resolve this issue.
    https://support2.microsoft.com/oas/default.aspx?&gprid=15467&&st=1&wfxredirect=1&sd=gn&wfxredirect=1&wa=wsignin1.0
    thanks
    Tomas
    MS HealthVault Escalations

  • New ECLIPSE SLI Build, but not POSTing

    Hello MSI peeps,
    Installed MB, CPU, CPU cooler, 1 stick of RAM, SSD, HD, PSU, 1 Video card and Optical drives, but cannot get it to POST.
    I powered up and the MB is showing light blue indicators on installed components, but no video signal going to monitor.
    I shut down, then connected DLED2 and powred up and DLED2 says CPU.ini, which means CPU error on POST, but is this really true?  I have read allot of everyone's posts on this forum where all claim that DLED2 is faulty.
    I am thinking that I may have plugged in too many drives and will disconnect the HD and optical drives to see if that may be the problem....should I also try to reset CMOS too?
    Here's my rig....
    Case: Coolermaster CM-830
    Mainboard: MSI Eclipse SLI
    CPU: Intel i7 975
    CPU cooler: Thermalright ULTRA-120 Extreme
    RAM: Two sets (12GB) of Corsair TR3X6G1600C7D Dominator 6GB PC3-12800 1600 MHz (2GB * 3)
    Video Cards: EVGA Model GTX295 Co-op x 2
    PSU: Enermax Model EGX1250EWT GALAXY EVO 1250W
    Primary drive: Patriot Torqx 2.5-Inch 128 GB SATAII SSD - Model PFZ128GS25SSDR
    Storage drive: Seagate Barracuda 500gb
    Optical drives: Pioneer Blu-Ray DVD Burner Model BDR-203BKS / SAMSUNG DVD Burner Model SH-S223L
    Thanks for your inputs!!!

    Hey All,
    Thanks for the help, but still no change....to save you having to read every thread, basically my build won't go to post.
    DLED2 reads that it is CPU.ini and of course I questioned hte validity of the DLED2 reading as I have read other threads claiming that DLED2 is faulty.....so thanks to those who have replied, I have tried everything suggested, but the build still won't post....no beeps, no video signal, but the mobo and video card LEDs indicate no issue.
    Is it RMA time or should I try something else?  Should I just RMA the board or should I also RMA the CPU too?
    Thanks for your help!
    My build....
    Case: Coolermaster CM-830
    Mainboard: MSI Eclipse SLI
    CPU: Intel i7 975
    CPU cooler: Thermalright ULTRA-120 Extreme
    RAM: Two sets (12GB) of Corsair TR3X6G1600C7D Dominator 6GB PC3-12800 1600 MHz (2GB * 3)
    Video Cards: EVGA Model GTX295 Co-op x 2
    PSU: Enermax Model EGX1250EWT GALAXY EVO 1250W
    Primary drive: Patriot Torqx 2.5-Inch 128 GB SATAII SSD - Model PFZ128GS25SSDR
    Storage drive: Seagate Barracuda 500gb
    Optical drives: Pioneer Blu-Ray DVD Burner Model BDR-203BKS / SAMSUNG DVD Burner Model SH-S223L

Maybe you are looking for

  • Checklist for the flow of FI and MM

    Hi All, Can anyone please guide me in preparing checklist for the flow of MM and FI from creation of purchase order to clearing the advance payment.

  • BAPI or Function Module for F-53 and FBZ1

    Hi Gurus, I am currently executing two transactions F-53 and FBZ1. I would like to know if there are any read BAPIs or function modules that take BELNR_D(Document Number) and Company code and Fiscal Year as input and give the rest of the details I en

  • Have tables names changed from CF6/7 to CF 8/9?

    <<Edit>>I might have just answered my question, sort of.  I had already exported the data from the hosted SQL 2000 DB to my local SQL 2000 DB and then backed up and restored it to an empty DB in SQL 2008 Express.  The tables have the dbo. prefix inst

  • Java Applet cann't be loaded in IE5.0, how come?

    When I open Internet Explorer(5.0) in my Windows2000 OS, and open a html page,it says "Exception:java.lang.ClassNotFoundException::ChatRoom.ChatRoomApplet.class". I've downloaded and installed the java SDK1.4.0_02. Any help? thks.

  • Install digital editions 4.0

    I can't install Digital Editions after Download. It can't be opened or executed. Help site doesn't work neither. I can't contact any support. I wish to download e-books on e-reader. Thank you for help.