Settlement of WBS/Project Profile (Cross Company Code)

Hello All,
At my current client, we are having 45 company codes assigned to one controlling area.My question is around setting of Project Profile/Settlement Profile. How do I manage project profiles?
Also If I am managing few project profiles allowing cross company code settlement, what are the pros and cons of doing this? What are the bare minimums for this with respect to configuration
Thanks
Shiv

projects are cross company codes but must be wuithin oine controlling area - so you are ok
the settlement will be from an object either WBS or network activity
the settlement will happen in the company code that is assigned to either the WBS or network activity
regards project profile create as less as possible - if the only difference is the company code then use templates for different companies, or make company code mandatory forcing the user to enter on creation - this will limit the number of project profiles

Similar Messages

Project stock exist in a plant and WBS but with different company code

Hello,
As I know I can not create a PO in company A, but was assigned to a WBS maintained in company code B. The system will check if the WBS getting the same company code with the PO, and pop up the error message if the company code was differect.
But seems the project stock could exists in a plant but assign to WBS was maintained with different company code. For example, A material stock was in plant A assigned to company code A, and it is also assigned to WBS belong to company code B.
Any one know it is correct?
Thanks!

I knew crossing company code to assign WBS element to PO is not allowed since i got the error message, and I think it's reasonable, cause the expense from the project PO should post to the same company code through the WBS element.
But why for the inventory crossing company code is allowed? The stock in plant A belong to company code A, was assigned to WBS element B belong to company code B. That means the inventory is in the GL balance of company A but under the profit center belong to company B. How to understand it? I think it's wrong

Assign settlement Profile to Company Code

HI ,
We will assign the settlement Profile to Company code
what is the T.Code for this or Path
Regards
Sure

Hi,
Settlement profile can be assign to Order type and to maintain the settlement profile please follow the below path:
SPRO--ControllingInternal Orders-Actual Postings-Settlement---Maintain Settlement Profiles
I hope it may help.
Regards,
Manish

Restrict cross CO area postings and allow cross company code postings

" There are two Controlling areas CA01 and CA02, for the controlling area CA02 the field CO code validation is inactive to allow cross company code postings ie., (Cost center created in one company code can be used as cost object in other company code ) Also this allows any WBS element created in controlling area CA01 as cost object in any of the company codes assigned in controlling area CA02,
Due to usage of WBS element which is created in CA01 controlling area as cost object in company code belongs to controlling area CA02, business is facing problem while doing the settlement run with error message " Document data for list of origins does not exist"
So, I have activated the field Co code validation in the controlling area CA02, which stopped the usage of WBS element between controlling areas. Also this had restricted usage of cost object between company codes with in controlling area CA02.
Now is there anyway to allow cost object usage between company codes assigned in one controlling area (CA02) and restrict usage of WBS element created in controlling area CA01 in any company code assigned in controlling area CA02.

Hi,
As you have already activated the Co Code validation you cant restrict that only to WBS. But you can have another option
Use the validation process to restrict these errors
This may help
Regards
Shantanu

RA15 and cross company code processing

We are using RA method 15 and have some projects that have account assignment WBS elements from other company codes than the billing WBS element. RA ignores figures from WBS elements with different company codes, hence recording COS in the company code of the account assignment WBS and Revenue (via RA) in the billing WBS element. Instead we would like have all revenue and COS calculated in RA on the billing element based on the incurred costs regardless of the company code in the account assignment WBS element. SAP OSS is suggesting that note 819760 may accomplish this. Does anyone have experience with this note.
We do not want to settle WBS elements within the hierarchy or create multiple billing elements.

Alex
Thanks for the update.
Regards
Virendra

The question about EDI in scenario 'Cross-Company Code Sales Processing'?

I'm doing the exercise with IDES system for the scenario 'Cross-Company Code Sales Processing'.
But when posting the EDI, it gave me the error as followings:
there are related data in table EDPP1, including customer and vendor data, but it still informed me the questions.
pls help!
Object 0090033869
Output type: tst IV for MM by ken
Processing log for program RSNASTED routine EDI_PROCESSING
EDI: Partner profile not available
EDI: Partner profile not available
    Message no. E0332
Diagnosis
    A partner profile could not be found with the following key:
    /0000000000/LI/
    This involves the key fields of the table EDPP1:
    -PARNUM partner number
    -PARTYP partner type
Procedure
    Please check the EDI partner profiles.
    Execute function

Hi
Partner profile is not seems to be maintained in tcode WE20.
Please maintain in WE20.
Kind Regards
sandeep

Cross company code Purchase Rebate

Hi All,
I want create a purchase Rebate for cross company code please let me is it possible if so what are the configuration I need to make.
Thanks & Regards
Chand

Dear,
Please check as SAP provides information that Rebate agreements can be made between purchase groups you can create cross company rebates.
A rebate agreement in purchasing can also be an agreement on a promotional deal or disposal costs.
A rebate agreement in purchasing is assigned to exactly one purchasing group.
If a rebate agreement is agreed within a cross-company code purchasing organization, then a company code through which the reimbursements can be settled is created for the rebate agreement.
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

Cross Company code Settings

Dear Friends Goodmorning,
We have One company , and Two company codes, A and B
One company Code (A) Make a Purchases in F-43
Another Company Code (B) will make a payment: F-53
What is the Configuration Need? Please help me what is the configuration need this setttings
Thanks
Babu.

Specific business transactions with trading partners
Several business transactions that occur frequently in the various operative applications - as
relating to their trading partner assignments -- are described more closely:
FI/Financial Accounting
- Customer or vendor invoice: The trading partner is copied from the customer or vendor
master record and is duplicated in the offsetting entries. Only one trading partner may
occur in the document.
- Invoice receipt against clearing account and transfers with clearing: If you do not post an
incoming invoice directly to an expense account, but instead against a clearing account,
the selection of open items must be restricted to those of a certain trading partner when
posting the transfer later on; the same trading partner is automatically copied onto the
transfer line item.
- Customer or vendor payment: You can configure the document type for payments to
allow for more than one trading partner in a payment document. Then, the trading
partner is copied only into the customer or vendor line items.
- Down payments and down payment clearings are always customer- or vendor-related
and are, therefore, handled like the invoices described above.
AA/Asset Accounting
- Asset transfers between company codes: If a fixed asset is transferred to another
company code, two posting documents are required - one for each company code. The
trading partner of each document must be set with the company ID of the other company
code, respectively.
MM/Materials Management
- When receiving goods from an affiliated vendor, the trading partner is taken from the
vendor mentioned on the order for the inventory entry and the goods/invoice receipt. If
invoices are still open on the balance sheet key date, group-internal provisions are
created from the clearing account for goods/invoice receipts. These provisions can later
be eliminated in the Consolidation system using the trading partner assignment.
- Order-related invoice receipts also derive the trading partner from the vendor on the
order and duplicate it into the offsetting entries.
- Material transactions across company codes automatically derive the trading partner
from the company code assignments.
CO/Cost Accounting
- Cross-company code CO settlements are transferred periodically using adjusting entries
to Financial Accounting via the reconciliation ledger. The trading partner is derived from
the company code, which, in turn, comes from the respective CO posting object being
addressed. These are always dual settlements, whereby the trading partner can always
be uniquely identified.

Payment term is not being pickedup in cross company code transaction

Dear Friends,
In one of the cross company code transaction scenarios (MIRO), We post a invoice in HQ books to bill on outside vendor. In subsidiary books one more cross company code document will get generated automatically, as billing on HQ as a vendor. In that second document, payment term is not being pickedup.
eg., A is HQ and B is subsidiary company
I post invoice in A books as B account debit and outside vendor credit.
In B books one more entry will get generated automatically as GRIR account debit and A (defined as vendor in B books) account credit.
In B Books payment terms are maintained in vendor master record (A vendor).
But still the payment terms are not being pickedup in that document. Because of this, it is taking the document date itself as net due date.
Please suggest, how to proceed to pick some payment term in that document.
Regards
Suresh

Hi
Assign the payment terms in Purchase Organisation level in Vendor Master Record.
Regards
Shammi

Posting using cross company code transaction must be blocked

Hello Guys,
I have a problem related to cross company code transaction.
In the OBA7 I have the document type KE that not allows posting using cross company code transactions. In the moment that I am creating a new document through the FB01, I have an error as "Consolidated companies US52 and ' ' are different
Message no. F5080. As a results, the document cannot be created by this way. This is the correct process.
But I have several documents that was used the doc type KE and the cross company code transaction was used. This is my issue. I don´t know why these documents were posted. The document come from another interface via IDOC and the IDOC not errored out.
Can anyone help on this?
Thanks
Rafael B.

Hello, I´ve checked the log and no changes since 2008.
The document was created in 2010.
This is the message: "No logs found for the selected period"
More suggestions?
Regards.
Rafael

Cross company code Stock transfer - Special procurement Key

Hi,
Please clear my following doubts...
1. We have two company codes, Company code: A1 having a Plant: AP1, Company code B1- Pant BP1,
Finished goods sold from the plant AP1 are purchased from the plant BP1, so is there is any possibility to create a special procurement key having BP1 as the delivering plant and assign the key in AP1 materials.
2. Can i combine the two plants AP1 and BP1 for total online planning (MD01) by creating a scope of planning indicator? and run a single MRP run for both plants at a time...
Please clarify...
Thanks,
JK

JK,
I dont think Scope Planning is problem. You can create Scope of planning combining multiple plants, use transaction OM0E.
I doubt on Special procurement key option for STO across cross company codes, as the special setting needed in that case would be that Plant as to be created as Vendor / Customer. I would suggest to post this to MM forum for further response on this.
Regards,
Prasobh

Transfer posting of tax in a cross company code transaction thru' RFBUST10

Hi,
I have a doubt regarding using the program RFBUST10 transferring the tax in a cross company transaction.
I have posted an invoice entry as below and I want to transfer the tax posting of 7.00 from company code 1 to company code 2 using the program RFBUST10.
Cr - 31 - 3rd party vendor - total amount of invoice co code 1 - 214.00
Dr - 40 - expense account - 100.00 co code 1 - C7 (Tax code at 7%)
Dr - 40 - expense account - 100.00 to co code 2 C7 (Tax code at 7%)
I have successfully posted and the tax amount of 7.00 is also transferred from company code 1 to company code2 but now I have 2 problems:
1) The program (RFBUST10) is permitting to transfer tax for the same cross- company code document multiple times. Please let me know how to track whether the cross company code document is already processed for transfer posting of tax.
2) In the transfer posting document as below ,the tax code in the first line item (clearing account) is defaulted to C0 , I would like to know from where this tax code defaults, I have not maintained the default tax code in the GL master.
Dr - 40 clearing Account 107 - C0 (tax code 0%)
Cr- 50 clearing account 100 - C7(tax code at 7%)
Cr - 50 Tax account 7 C7
Please let me know how to resolve these issues.
Tks
SS

hi venkat sri,
gud day, did you manage to solve the transfer intercompany tax using program RFBUST10? Could you share the solution?
Looking forward for your reply.
Regards,
Jay

F-02 Docment posted for cross company code TAX

Dear Experts ,
Can you please explain me ,
when i posted docment in F-02 for cross company code postings that is Dr for 1150 company code and credit for 5500 company code ,
1] i need to enter tax code is YY is same to both company codes 1150 & 5500
] i need to enter tax jurisdiction code for company code 1150 is 1254693 and company code 5500 is 4525658
when i enter these two Tax jurisdiction code system shows error when i saved error message # FF 744
ERROR MESSAGE BELOW
[ The jurisdiction codes entered on the individual line items have different controls for determinating the cash discount base amount (upper level and ).
This is not allowed within a document.
Procedure
Please correct the entered jurisdiction code (if not correct) or if need be, post the transaction to two single documents.
Can you please help me how i enter postings in F-02
Regards
Bhaskar

Thanks

CO-PA issue in Thirds Party Sales & Cross Company Code Sales

Hi,
In Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification and Cross Company Sales the CO-PA report is not reflecting the correct material cost. CO-PA is updating the material cost directly from the Material Master. Cross Company sales condition type PI02 & IV02 is using for pricing. IV02 is working perfect, but PI02 is not !
In detail, for Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification, no material is available in the stock. In material master the material cost display as $ 10/EA. But the Purchase Order value is $ 15/EA. During Goods Receipt time system is taking the cost as $ 15. While Billing time to the customer, system is posting to the CO-PA the material cost as $10/EA. FI postings are perfect, but CO-PA posting is not correct. CO-PA and P&L reconciliation is not matching due to this issue !
Waiting for the help.
Best regards,
Joby

Have you considered using this user-exit?
User Exits in the SAPFV45PF0E and SAPFV45PF0C Programs
EXIT_SAPFV45P_001
You can use this user exit to decide whether intercompany billing data is used in the profitability segment for cross-company code sales, or whether the data comes from external billing (external customer, sales data from the selling company code.
Thanks,
Ben

How to configure Funds Transfers, Cross Company Code Vendor Payments, Bill

Hi All,
Can any one help me, How to configure Funds Transfers, Cross Company Code Vendor Payments, Bill of Exchnage Payments with Automatic Payment Program?
Regards
Chandra

Hi Chandra,
This is what you need to do to configure Cross Company Code Vendor Payments.
Execute transaction code OBYA, when prompted, type in 1st coy code, say A and then 2nd coy code, say B. This would take you to the "Maintain FI Configuration: Automatic Posting - Clearing Accounts" screen.
In the first frame, where you have
Posted in : A
Cleared Against : B
Under Receivable
Debit Posting Key : 01
Account Debit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account)
Under Payable
Credit Posting Key : 31
Account Credit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account).
In the second Frame
Posted in : B
Cleared Against : A
Under Receivable
Debit Posting Key : 01
Account Debit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account)
Under Payable
Credit Posting Key : 31
Account Credit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account).
So, if you are using the Customer/Vendor approach, company A must be set up as both a Customer(Use Txn Code XD01) and a Vendor(USe Txn Code XK01) in Company B and vice versa.
Once you have completed this set-up, you can then use transaction F.13 and/or F13E to carry out your automatic clearing. Alternatively, whenever Payment Run is executed via transaction code F110, this would automatically clear out the payables and receivables in each company code.
However, if you intend to use the G/L approach, then the account numbers would be Inter-coy G/L account for each coy code as defined in the chart of accounts.
I hope the above helps.
Do not forget to award the points please.
Regards,
Jacob

Settlement of WBS/Project Profile (Cross Company Code)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for