Settlement of WBS to Asset

Hi,
The issue is as follows:
User has capitalized an expense which was earlier been booked under WBS in March 2007.
On 13.12.2007, they have received a credit note & booked under relevant WBS but not yet settled to asset, so there is a balance lying in AUC account on 31.12.2007 till now, now user wants to settle those WBS over asset.
Note:1. Fiscal year 2007 (Jan to Dec) & 2008 has already been closed & dep. has been posted accordingly.
2. We are on SAP 4.6C version & IM module has been implemented here
Now I am running CJ88 transaction in 2009 for period 11 to settle this WBS to asset but getting the following error:
"Transaction in area 01 contradicts the net book value rule
Message no. AA 660
Diagnosis
The document cannot be posted, as it is contrary to the net book value rule which is checked in area 01.
Procedure
This error usually occurs when you enter proportional values. The proportional values exceed the amount posted, for example, post capitalization of 100 but proportional depreciation to the amount 110. Check your entries and correct them if necessary."
Can anybody suggest me about feasible steps for solving this issue.
Thanks & Regards
Anuj Agarwal

When you search on this forum try to put Date range "ALL" to get more results. Please read below threads and you will get the solution.
MIRO:Transaction in area 15 contradicts the net book value rule
Transaction in area 01 contradicts the NBV
Looks like you have a negative balance in your WBS which you are trying to settle to FA.

Similar Messages

Issue in settlement of WBS to Asset under construction

I had created new WBS elements to projects and tried to settle the values in the WBS element to Auc at the end of period 12.
Instead of settling to Auc acquisition account specified in account determination in asset accounting, the values are trying to settle to downpayment clearing account specified in the asset accounting.
Can you tell me how I should correct that.

When you search on this forum try to put Date range "ALL" to get more results. Please read below threads and you will get the solution.
MIRO:Transaction in area 15 contradicts the net book value rule
Transaction in area 01 contradicts the NBV
Looks like you have a negative balance in your WBS which you are trying to settle to FA.

Settlement of WBS to the Fixed Asset in another company code

Hi Friends,
I have another problem with WBS elements and fixed assets.
I used WBS elements to create a AUC by AUC settlement in company code A. Then I put a second settlement rule with settlement type "FUL" in WBS element and settle AUC to a depreciable asset in company code A. Then I transfer the depreciable asset from company code A to company code B. Now I put the current month as the end day of the second settlement rule and add a third settlement rule in WBS element in compnay code A. The third settlement rule will settle to the depreciable asset in company B. When I am adding the third settlement rule, the system gives an error: "Asset XXXX not in company code A" .
Then I add another WBS element in company code A and put a settlement rule which settle to the depreciable asset in company code B. The system did not issue any error. Everything works fine.
So it seems the WBS element cannot settle to the asset in the other company code if it created a AUC in its own company code.
People told me that it worked in their legacy SAP system. So I am wondering whether there is some settings that I did not do, which caused this problem.
Do you have any idea about this?
Thanks,
Ting

in the requesting company codeon the wbs master data enter the company code for which the AuC and the fixed asset will be created
in this way you can settle from a project in one company code to an asset in another company code

One report to check WBS and Asset number

Hi All,
Please advice. Is there any report to check WBS and asset number belong to ?
Many thanks in advance.
Nies

Please let me know your exact requirement.
But KOSRLIST_PR will show (if you have valid entries) the settlement receiver something like below with WBS element information and settlement details:
WBS ISC/00002-1-02 RECEIVER WBS2-COMP 1000
FXA 1000/700000132/0 RECEIVER WBS2-COMP 1000 100.00 AUC Act
Regards
Sreenivas

Error while settlement of WBS - Funds Management

Hi,
We have maintain derivation rule as - WBS to Fund Center. This Fund center is DUMMY because we need not want to control WBS through Funds Management.
There is always one Cost center in each WBS. while settling this WBS we are getting error as -
Asset ABC 000127000000 0000: no subnumber with FM assignment DUMMY / /
Message no. AW851
ABC - Company code
000127000000 - asset number
DUMMY - Fund center
suggest.

alex ice wrote:
Hi, 1 change FC in AS02 to dummy if it applicable.
> 2 Check note 618269 it applicable.
> 3 remove FC from asset master data
Hi Alex, how are u!?
I've got the same issue than Harsh Vaidya in my system ...
Ive already read this notes: [618269|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/618269] (no apply to me, because Joint Venture Accounting isn't active), [844262|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/844262], [1473357|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1473357], [446029|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/446029] and [440396|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/440396]
All very interesting notes :P
But... I couldn't find the solution
I try to TRACE from FMDERIVE too, but when I go to KO88, FMDERIVE's trace doesn't track anything.
Any help to throw some more light on this thread, would be very useful.
Thanks a lot!
Regards from Argentine.

WBS in Asset Master

Hi All,
One Asset was mapped to WBS in Asset master at the time of creation (Origin tab in asset master). Now I want to de-link this mapping, or simply put remove/delete this WBS from asset master as client does not wish to settle the project to this Asset. This field is greyed out in AS02 and cant be changed directly. Any pointers on this this WBS can be removed from this mapping?
Regards,
Vaibhav

The only time I've seen what you're describing be the actual case, is when the asset main numbers are the same - but different sub-numbers (appended 4-digit field).
System can have main on the settlement rule, and actually settle to a sub-number instead (asset NOT on the settlement rule).
This happens when the asset master data of the receiver (the one on the settlement rule) does not match the master data objects for the sender AuC (asset under construction) or perhaps an internal order.
Scrutinize the master data for the asset on the settlement rule, comparing it to the sender and then to the one receiving the settled value. I think you'll find the receiver on settlement rule is not a good match. It may be possible to test this by inputting a deactivated date on the General tab of the sub-number (the one NOT on the settlement rule). Then, a settlement error message should be thrown telling you there is no sub-number asset that can receive the settlement.
It is coincidence that that sub-number has the WBS on its Origin tab.
Removing it from Origin tab will not stop settlements to the sub-number if I am correct.
Regards,
Greg

Settling the WBS element costs to an AuC

Please Explain the procedure for settling the WBS element costs to an AuC & then to asset?

Hi,
Please follow the below sequence of steps for this:
1) For WBS element where the asset has to be created, AUC willbe created automatically when the WBS element is in release status to get this investment profile should be assigned to WBS element in Control Tab
2) You can see in the system status show as AUC to see the AUC number follow the path
EDIT-> WBS element -> Investment program--> Asset under Construction where you can see the AUC which is created automatically
3) Once the above two steps are through, for settlement to AuC goto transaction CJ88 give the WBS element number select the processing type as partial captalization and execute all the costs pertaining to that. WBS elements will be automatically settled to the AUC which is created for that WBS element
Thanks,
Prithwiraj.

Will Project Budget be available again after settlement to AUC/final asset?

I would like to know if my project budget will become available again once I settle costs to AUC and to Final asset (or settle directly to final asset w/o AUC).
Letu2019s say my original budget for WBS is 5000, cost was posted to the WBS u2013 4000, now I settle the 4000 cost to AUC (and eventually from AUC to final asset). Will this mean the entire 5000 will be available again since the cost has been settled from WBS to AUC (and eventually fixed asset)?
Thanks!
Vivian

If you have Budgeted WBS element and than after you does any cost postings against that WBS. you budget get consumed by that actual cost.
however, WBS element is capturing cost for the period of project duration that cost has to transfer to FI/ CO , finally so, at the period-end we does the settlement & transfer taht cost to cost center , PA , asset etc....
So, no point that after settlement your budget will be your initial budget.
Regards
Nitin

Does anyone use Framwork POs for WBS and Asset management.

We have had issues before with trying to use Framework POs for Assets. I wanted to know, does anyone out there use the Framework PO for the creation of Assets with charges going to WBS elements? Do you track service charges as well as material charges that are purchsed for Assets?

For PO, WBS, Asset frame work below is the sample
Create WBS which manage AUC
Example you will create a clinic,
Create Project - [Project Clinic]
Create WBS under the Project Clinic - [Clinic Expense]
Create AUC under WBS Clinic Expense - [Clinic under Construction]
Let say you purchase Paint for the clinic - create a PO and use account assignment WBS [Clinic Expense] (e.g. 1000 USD)
Let say you purchase Wood for the clinic - create a PO and use account assignment WBS [Clinic Expense] (e.g. 2000 USD)
During month end you can settle the amount to AUC (tcocde CJ88 - Settlement type - Automatic)
All charges to WBS will go to AUC
Once construction of clinic is finished and is ready to use, you need to settle all the amount from WBS to AUC (through settlement)
Then create Fixed Asset [Clinic Building]
Then settele the AUC [Clinic under Construction] charges to Fixed Asset [Clinic Building] through CJ88 settlement type - Final settlement
Thanks!
Jhero

Cost Before settlement in WBS element

Hi Experts ,
In my scenario following costs are coming to WBS element,
1. Cost from Network ... i.e. Networks are getting settled to WBS element
2. Internal Order .....i.e. Internal orders are getting settled to WBS element
3. Plant Manitance order...i.e. PM orders are getting settled to WBS element
4. Cost from other WBS element..... i.e. cost from one WBS element get settled to other WBS element
All the cost from WBS element get settled to AUC then from AUC to final asset.
Before settlement of WBS element I can see the cost in WBSE in trasnaction CJI3.
After settlement if I see the cost of same WBSE in CJI3 , it shows 0 cost ,as all the cost has been settled to Asset.
I wanted to know what was cost before my settlement in CJI3 transaction.
Could you please let me know in CJ3 transaction on which fields I need to put the filter in above scenario ??
Regards,
Pradip Shelke

Hi,
YOu can also filter on the basis of document type.
Please check the relevant document types like WE ( Goods reciept ) etc. Not only KOAO but other business transactions like KOAE also are settlement docs exclude them.
BR

Error while settlement of IO to Asset

Dear Experts,
We are settling IO to multiple assets using KO88 and get the below error , any tips would assist
System error: Master area for proof of origin not found
Message no. AW 666
regards
Diwakar

Hi,
You should check if depreciation area 01 is activated. If not, activate it and it should allow settlement.
Or could it be that you possibly have no depreciation area 01 in the AuC?
In such a case when there is no depreciation area 01 present in AUC, it is NOT possible to post from an internal order to an asset under construction.
If you do not want values in depreciation area 01, you can customize a capitalization key in the AuC. Please refer to the documentation on this functionality.
This inforamtion should help you to resolve AW 666 when trying to settle an Internal Order.
Kind regards,
Brigitte Kuehni

Error while doing settlement from WBS to P&L Account

Hello
I am trying to do a settlement from WBS to P&L Account(Expense account). In this case, "Dummy" Prof Ctr is getting derived from 0KE5 (we have maintained a dummy prof ctr). We have set the validations to disallow any postings/settlements to dummy prof ctr. Hence I am getting an error while doing settlement.
Now I am maintaning a Prof ctr in my WBS master data. I am unable to understand why system is deriving dummy prof ctr and not the one maintained on WBS master data. The settlements are working fine when I do them against Balance sheet accounts and proper prof ctr is getting derived, which is being maintained on WBS master data. I am getting trouble only while doing settlement to my P&lL i.e. expense accounts.
can anyone throw some light on this?
Thks
Sarang

Dear Sarang,
You have maintained profit center in WBS master which is not updated at the time settlement to FI that what makes you worried. If you are making FI posting and give WBS as an additional account assignment then Profit center in WBS master will be updated. Here in settlement WBS is sender not the receiver so that profit center will not be updated. In settlement receiver (any) is debited and sender (WBS) is credited so this credit entry will be updated in profit center.
To your second query that when you carry out settlement to balance sheet account right profit center is updated then please make sure, that balance sheet account is maintained in 3KEH with profit center or OKB9.
Your P&L account (expense) receives dummy profit center because it is not able to find cost center which can fetch profit center from the master. So, if you can afford, maintain that cost elements (expense account) with profit center in OKB9.
might help you..........................................................

Balance in 1 currencies at the time of settlement of WBS to cost Centre

Hi,
while settling the WBS to cost centre I am getting this error in IDES for CO Code1000.
Balances have been found in 1 currencies with the following details:
Currency type Amount Currency
40 0.04 USD
(A maximum of three differences are listed)
Pl suggest what to check
Thank You.
Regards
Man

None

Settlement of WBS

Hi Gurus,
While settling a WBS to a cost center, system is giving error which says Settlement from revenue to reciever cost center not allowed. The sender has revenues or customer down payments with cost element 9000000001 (business transaction: Automat. WIP/results analysis).
I have created a allocation structure and i have assigned cost elements in one assignment and revenue elements in other assignment.
Please tell me how can i solve the issue.
Thank You

Hi,
Please check the settlement profile whether the cost center is made optional as a valid receiver or not.
Thanks

Settlement of WBS - KI235 - Account Requires an Assignment to a CO Object

Hello,
Im having an issue when running settlement on a WBS Element. The settlement rule on the WBS element indicates that settlement is to be charged to GL Account 629080. I checked the WBS Element, and there is a cost centre entered on the settlement rule as well.
My issue is when I run settlement, I receive the following message:
Message no. KI235 - Account 629080 requires an assignment to a CO object
I have no idea why settlement is not picking up the cost centre on the WBS Element itself.
Does anyone have any ideas as to what I can do to settle this WBS Element? We do not want to update the OKB9
table and enter a default, as each WBS is for a unique Cost Centre.
Thanks!
Edited by: Robert Collia on Jan 13, 2011 10:55 PM

Hi
We had the same issue followign a recent upgrade and I couldn't work out why the settlement couldn't read the cost centre from the settlement rule.
It turned out that we had overwritten an oss note.
Take a look at sap note 1296568 - point 5, this should tie in with what you want your settlement to do.
This then refers to note 483340, this is the note we had lost.
Hope that helps

Settlement of WBS to Asset

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for