Settlement of WBS
Hi Gurus,
While settling a WBS to a cost center, system is giving error which says Settlement from revenue to reciever cost center not allowed. The sender has revenues or customer down payments with cost element 9000000001 (business transaction: Automat. WIP/results analysis).
I have created a allocation structure and i have assigned cost elements in one assignment and revenue elements in other assignment.
Please tell me how can i solve the issue.
Thank You
Hi,
Please check the settlement profile whether the cost center is made optional as a valid receiver or not.
Thanks
Similar Messages
-
Error while settlement of WBS - Funds Management
Hi,
We have maintain derivation rule as - WBS to Fund Center. This Fund center is DUMMY because we need not want to control WBS through Funds Management.
There is always one Cost center in each WBS. while settling this WBS we are getting error as -
Asset ABC 000127000000 0000: no subnumber with FM assignment DUMMY / /
Message no. AW851
ABC - Company code
000127000000 - asset number
DUMMY - Fund center
suggest.alex ice wrote:
Hi, 1 change FC in AS02 to dummy if it applicable.
> 2 Check note 618269 it applicable.
> 3 remove FC from asset master data
Hi Alex, how are u!?
I've got the same issue than Harsh Vaidya in my system ...
Ive already read this notes: [618269|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/618269] (no apply to me, because Joint Venture Accounting isn't active), [844262|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/844262], [1473357|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1473357], [446029|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/446029] and [440396|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/440396]
All very interesting notes :P
But... I couldn't find the solution
I try to TRACE from FMDERIVE too, but when I go to KO88, FMDERIVE's trace doesn't track anything.
Any help to throw some more light on this thread, would be very useful.
Thanks a lot!
Regards from Argentine. -
Error while doing settlement from WBS to P&L Account
Hello
I am trying to do a settlement from WBS to P&L Account(Expense account). In this case, "Dummy" Prof Ctr is getting derived from 0KE5 (we have maintained a dummy prof ctr). We have set the validations to disallow any postings/settlements to dummy prof ctr. Hence I am getting an error while doing settlement.
Now I am maintaning a Prof ctr in my WBS master data. I am unable to understand why system is deriving dummy prof ctr and not the one maintained on WBS master data. The settlements are working fine when I do them against Balance sheet accounts and proper prof ctr is getting derived, which is being maintained on WBS master data. I am getting trouble only while doing settlement to my P&lL i.e. expense accounts.
can anyone throw some light on this?
Thks
SarangDear Sarang,
You have maintained profit center in WBS master which is not updated at the time settlement to FI that what makes you worried. If you are making FI posting and give WBS as an additional account assignment then Profit center in WBS master will be updated. Here in settlement WBS is sender not the receiver so that profit center will not be updated. In settlement receiver (any) is debited and sender (WBS) is credited so this credit entry will be updated in profit center.
To your second query that when you carry out settlement to balance sheet account right profit center is updated then please make sure, that balance sheet account is maintained in 3KEH with profit center or OKB9.
Your P&L account (expense) receives dummy profit center because it is not able to find cost center which can fetch profit center from the master. So, if you can afford, maintain that cost elements (expense account) with profit center in OKB9.
might help you.......................................................... -
Balance in 1 currencies at the time of settlement of WBS to cost Centre
Hi,
while settling the WBS to cost centre I am getting this error in IDES for CO Code1000.
Balances have been found in 1 currencies with the following details:
Currency type Amount Currency
40 0.04 USD
(A maximum of three differences are listed)
Pl suggest what to check
Thank You.
Regards
ManNone
-
Hi,
The issue is as follows:
User has capitalized an expense which was earlier been booked under WBS in March 2007.
On 13.12.2007, they have received a credit note & booked under relevant WBS but not yet settled to asset, so there is a balance lying in AUC account on 31.12.2007 till now, now user wants to settle those WBS over asset.
Note:1. Fiscal year 2007 (Jan to Dec) & 2008 has already been closed & dep. has been posted accordingly.
2. We are on SAP 4.6C version & IM module has been implemented here
Now I am running CJ88 transaction in 2009 for period 11 to settle this WBS to asset but getting the following error:
"Transaction in area 01 contradicts the net book value rule
Message no. AA 660
Diagnosis
The document cannot be posted, as it is contrary to the net book value rule which is checked in area 01.
Procedure
This error usually occurs when you enter proportional values. The proportional values exceed the amount posted, for example, post capitalization of 100 but proportional depreciation to the amount 110. Check your entries and correct them if necessary."
Can anybody suggest me about feasible steps for solving this issue.
Thanks & Regards
Anuj AgarwalWhen you search on this forum try to put Date range "ALL" to get more results. Please read below threads and you will get the solution.
MIRO:Transaction in area 15 contradicts the net book value rule
Transaction in area 01 contradicts the NBV
Looks like you have a negative balance in your WBS which you are trying to settle to FA. -
Settlement of WBS - KI235 - Account Requires an Assignment to a CO Object
Hello,
Im having an issue when running settlement on a WBS Element. The settlement rule on the WBS element indicates that settlement is to be charged to GL Account 629080. I checked the WBS Element, and there is a cost centre entered on the settlement rule as well.
My issue is when I run settlement, I receive the following message:
Message no. KI235 - Account 629080 requires an assignment to a CO object
I have no idea why settlement is not picking up the cost centre on the WBS Element itself.
Does anyone have any ideas as to what I can do to settle this WBS Element? We do not want to update the OKB9
table and enter a default, as each WBS is for a unique Cost Centre.
Thanks!
Edited by: Robert Collia on Jan 13, 2011 10:55 PMHi
We had the same issue followign a recent upgrade and I couldn't work out why the settlement couldn't read the cost centre from the settlement rule.
It turned out that we had overwritten an oss note.
Take a look at sap note 1296568 - point 5, this should tie in with what you want your settlement to do.
This then refers to note 483340, this is the note we had lost.
Hope that helps -
Settling the WBS element costs to an AuC
Please Explain the procedure for settling the WBS element costs to an AuC & then to asset?
Hi,
Please follow the below sequence of steps for this:
1) For WBS element where the asset has to be created, AUC willbe created automatically when the WBS element is in release status to get this investment profile should be assigned to WBS element in Control Tab
2) You can see in the system status show as AUC to see the AUC number follow the path
EDIT-> WBS element -> Investment program--> Asset under Construction where you can see the AUC which is created automatically
3) Once the above two steps are through, for settlement to AuC goto transaction CJ88 give the WBS element number select the processing type as partial captalization and execute all the costs pertaining to that. WBS elements will be automatically settled to the AUC which is created for that WBS element
Thanks,
Prithwiraj. -
Good morning all ps guies
I need help from u
I m doing customer project. My top WBS element is account assignment and billing element.
This wbs is assigned to scales order .I m getting cost and revenues on this wbs element.
Now i want to settle this wbs element. One way is to settle to co-pa, as this wbs is carring both cost and revenues.
But co team decided not to implement co-pa.
so where can i settle this wbs element? and how?
can i settle to cost center? scales order?
Please give ur suggessions
regards
shashanklHi Gurus,
I am loading the REAl ESTATE data through LSMW-BAPI.
I need to load the settlement reciever as WBS elements.
While loading the data i am getting the error
WBS element does not exist even though it is existing in the client and master table as well.
KIndly let me know what can be done regarding this?? -
Cost Before settlement in WBS element
Hi Experts ,
In my scenario following costs are coming to WBS element,
1. Cost from Network ... i.e. Networks are getting settled to WBS element
2. Internal Order .....i.e. Internal orders are getting settled to WBS element
3. Plant Manitance order...i.e. PM orders are getting settled to WBS element
4. Cost from other WBS element..... i.e. cost from one WBS element get settled to other WBS element
All the cost from WBS element get settled to AUC then from AUC to final asset.
Before settlement of WBS element I can see the cost in WBSE in trasnaction CJI3.
After settlement if I see the cost of same WBSE in CJI3 , it shows 0 cost ,as all the cost has been settled to Asset.
I wanted to know what was cost before my settlement in CJI3 transaction.
Could you please let me know in CJ3 transaction on which fields I need to put the filter in above scenario ??
Regards,
Pradip ShelkeHi,
YOu can also filter on the basis of document type.
Please check the relevant document types like WE ( Goods reciept ) etc. Not only KOAO but other business transactions like KOAE also are settlement docs exclude them.
BR -
Settlement of WBS element down payments to an asset under constructions
The down payment (of the transactions tcode F-47 and tcode F-110), are
always settlement wbs element (tcode CJ88), we do not want to post down
payments to the receiving asset under construction (transaction type
180 or 181).
In the down payments are always taken into account in the settlement to
an asset. The settlement of the down payment is the actual reason for
the previous update of down payments in FI (Transaction type group
15). Furthermore, the settlement of down payments to assets should
not be capitalize.When you search on this forum try to put Date range "ALL" to get more results. Please read below threads and you will get the solution.
MIRO:Transaction in area 15 contradicts the net book value rule
Transaction in area 01 contradicts the NBV
Looks like you have a negative balance in your WBS which you are trying to settle to FA. -
Issue in settlement of WBS to Asset under construction
I had created new WBS elements to projects and tried to settle the values in the WBS element to Auc at the end of period 12.
Instead of settling to Auc acquisition account specified in account determination in asset accounting, the values are trying to settle to downpayment clearing account specified in the asset accounting.
Can you tell me how I should correct that.When you search on this forum try to put Date range "ALL" to get more results. Please read below threads and you will get the solution.
MIRO:Transaction in area 15 contradicts the net book value rule
Transaction in area 01 contradicts the NBV
Looks like you have a negative balance in your WBS which you are trying to settle to FA. -
No AUC shown on settlement for WBS
The WBS shows status of AUC but when you go to the the WBS and check the settlement rule, there is none shown. If you go from the project WBS to the AUC (Extras>Asset under construction)the AUC was created.
The account assignment indicator is set and the investment profile is assigned to the WBS and provides for an asset under construction.
I am using t-code CJ20N. Why isn't the AUC shown on the settlement for the WBS?Hi,
Settlement rule (For Partial Settlement i.e.Moving the cost from WBSE to AUC) will get populated once you do the Partial Settlement (i.e. Moving the cost from WBSE to AUC) through CJ88 / CJ8G.
Once you do the partial settlement you can see the settlement rule by Edit -
> Cost -
>Settlement rule.
By investment profile you can generate the AUC asset nos against the WBSE once you release the project. But those AUC asset no will only get reflected in settlement rule once you do the partial settlement (i.e. Moving the cost from WBSE to AUC).
Thanks & regards,
Pradip -
Error - Settlement for WBS Element
Dear All
My query is the prj is EP & WBS El is EP-99, under EP-99 the avialable values are Rs192,523/- as per different cost element wise & the values has been posted/transferred the reposting transaction from another wbs element. Those values have to settled on an one AUC-asset & the value will be settled periodicaly. My posted values are in 10th/2008 & I want to settled the said values in 10th prd. But after processing of CJ88 the error has been raised "There no accured amounts settlement is not possible" Also note that Other WBSE has been settled under said prj.
Please help me.
Regards
Avijit Barman
Edited by: Avijit Barman on Feb 25, 2008 12:06 PMDear Sreenivas
My issue is solve but not from note. I convert status from REL to TECO of WBS element & set the full settlement & prd 11 instead of 10th. Then run & its ok.
Regards
Avijit -
Supress/ avoid posting downpayment to asset on settlement of WBS
HI All,
WBS/ internal order is an investment measure. downpayments are posted to the WBS which are getting settled to the asset. Accounting entry posted is
CWIP Acquisition: down payments Dr
CWIP Down-payments clearing account Cr
However the business does not want downpayments to be be posted to asset at all. How can the postings to downpayment and downpayment clearing account be stopped
Thanks & Regards
Pooja SaxenaSAP note 434622 resolved this issue.
-
Settlement Through WBS element in CJ88
Dear Expert,
When I going settle one asse through WBS element P05/00204/CB, I got the follwing problem in SAP
Down payment to recipient 802000000006 0 area 01 amount 5,142.74 not cleared
Message no. AW605
Diagnosis
All downpayments were not cleared for the asset under construction for the receiver 802000000006 0 in area 01. An amount of 5,142.74 was not cleared, or too much was cleared.
You can only completely transfer an asset under construction if you reverse the down payments in the current fiscal year beforehand.
Procedure
Clear the downpayments that you want to settle to receiver 802000000006 0.
Should I find the vendor? If yes, how can I find exact vedor.
Regards
Davidgot it from PS forum
Maybe you are looking for
-
Problem with Behringer ada8000 - GarageBand Connection HELP!
Hi! I have an iMac (Mac OS X 10.6.5) and I'm super happy for it! I use it mainly for making music. my problem is that I have this 'Behringer Ultra Gain pro-8 digital' as I apparently can't figure out how to connect..? I understand clearly the princip
-
1)I wants to change default extensions.ietab.filterlist value to mywebsite url without going to follow many steps,whenever user will hit my site then for users browser extensions.ietab.filterlist value should be added when he will hit my site.About:c
-
When opening a webpage (such as sky news) always opens on a new tab.
So i search for a web page such as sky news and this bring up a list as normal, however, when i click on the webpage I would expect the webpage to open on the same tab. But it does not, it opens it on a new tab!!??
-
Problem with dot notation in wsdl-file
Hello, I want to consume a soap web service that is created in the sap system within a ios app. I am generating the stub files with sudzc. Unfortunately sudzc is making classes with a dot in its name. This is caused by the wsdl-file: <wsdl:types> <xs
-
Itunes on macbook pro with mac os x tiger software.
tunes on macbook pro with mac os x tiger software, i cant connect and it doesnt upgrade from 9.1.1 to itunes 10 why?