Settlement with KO8G

Hi,
We are running KO8G for collective settlement of work orders & finding some orders in Inappropriate status without explaination of what are those order nos. need to know is there any report in CO or table where
1. We can find out all the orders which are settled with their values.
2. Inappropriate order nos & their resaon.
3. Any CO report that gives total values posted in orders in Company code or at plant level & how much has been settled till date or period.
Your early response to this will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Vipin Arora

Hello
When you process KO8G go to Extras >  Help on Help Log, here you will
see the following information for 'Inappropriate Status':
Inappropriate status           Number of senders that are not
                               to be settled for the following reasons:
                               - The sender still has the status
                                 "Created".
                               - The sender is already closed.
                               - The sender has been flagged
                                 for deletion.
                               - The sender has been deleted.
                               - The sender is a production
                                 order that has no results
                                 analysis key and has
                                 neither been technically
                                 completed nor finally delivered
                                 in the settlement period.
                                 The sender has been settled
                                 using worklists and has a
                                 status that prevents settlement
                                 (such as Locked).
You will need to check the selection criteria of the variant being used
to determine the orders which fall into this criteria.
If you wish to see the orders included in the category inappropriate
status, you can try to use the Flow Trace for settlements to
see if this can give you the details you require.
If not then you should look to the selection variant that is being used
and whether or not certain status's are being selected and try to
exclude the status that are mentioned in the long text:
- Created
- Closed
- Flagged for deletion
- Technically Completed
Regards
Javier Reviriego

Similar Messages

  • Work Order to cost center settlement with line item detail

    Iu2019m having difficulty finding a method to settle from a work order to a cost center with line item detail.  When an order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the total value for that work order/cost element combination is combined and posted to the cost center as a lump sum with the description of CTR\######.  Users would like to see the individual values that posted to the work order in a cost center report such as  KSB1.
    I donu2019t see anything in the settlement rule, settlement profile or allocation structure that will allow line item settlement from work order to cost center.     Is line item settlement possible when settling to a cost center?   Is there an alternate way to see these expenses as line items in KSB1?
    Thanks,
    Jeff

    Thanks Christian,
    We've defined an allocation structure that we use for Project System and Work Order settlement and have Receiver Categories established as FXA, CTR and WBS with "by Cost Element"  checked.  Work order costs do settle to the cost center entered in the settlement rule, the problem is it combines all items values as a single amount when posting to the cost center.
    For example:  
    expenses post to the work order under cost element 500000 for $500, $200, $300 and cost element 600000 for $250 and $250.  The settlement rule says to settle to cost center 170000.  When the settlement takes place cost center 170000 is debited $1000 to cost element 500000 and $500 to cost element 600000.  We would prefer to see individual posting of $500, $200, $300 to 500000  and $250, $250 to 600000.
    Thanks,
    Jeff

  • Internal order settlement through KO8G

    Hi gurus,
    I have created variant sapvar and given inputs int he following fields
    Order type
    Order
    Controlling area
    Company code
    and selected the orders tobe settled
    with selection of all the status
    and executed
    But the system is giving the error
    zero sender settled and
    No settlement for this sender
    I have the IO with settlement profile defined, still it is not picking up
    Kindly do the needful in fixing this problem as soon aspossible
    Thanking you
    Ritu

    Hi Ritu,
    Just check if there are any values posted for the selected orders for the specific date range through transaction code KOB1.
    You could have selected a different settlement period otherwise on KO8G.
    If you need more info, pl. do reply.
    Warm Regards,
    Som

  • Define back ground job for Maintenance Order Settlement through KO8G

    Hi Experts,
    I need to define back ground job for Maintenance Order Settlement through KO8G transaction code.
    Here are the requirements
    1. The job should run on weekly basis automatically.
    2. The settlement period and posting period should be taken care by the job dynamically. i.e. if the job runs in July, the job should pick up Settlement period and posting period as 7 automatically.
    Kindly let me know the steps to define the back ground job as per above requirement.
    Sanjeev

    To run the KO8G  each week, the a RECURRING job has to be created.  At my job, Basis/Ops department would create and schedule the job.
    To have the posting periods, dates etc dynamically determined at the time the job runs:
    Create the variant and save.
    In 5.0, KO8G does not save a variant, therefore, go to SE38 and create a variant for program: RKO7KO8G
    When you go to the ATTRIBUTES screen, to add a name and description, you will see a list of all the fields that are part of the selection criteria. 
    For an example, I frequently use the Posting Date. To the right of the screen is a field called Selection Variable, click on the drop box and select D - Dynamic Date Calculation.
    Go to field NAme of variable, click on drop box and select the variable you want.
    Each field has its own list of selection variable and name of variable depending on how it works in the progra.
    If you look at Posting period you will see:
         T: Table Variable from TVARVC
         B: User-defined variables
    I do not know about User defined variables, but for TVARC there is thread that leads to a "how to" blog
    [How create a variable in the TVARVC that calculate the last week]
    do some more searching and you should find more answers
    Good luck
    Althea

  • WBS settlement with AUC

    Hello,
    Can anybody help to do the configuration for wbs settlement with AUC other than below mentioned configuration.
    1. New Asset class creation with line iteme settlement.
    2. Allocaiton structure added settlement with FXA.
    3. New settlement profile created with default object type FXA,document type AA and amount settlement check box activated.
    but based on above mentioned configuration i am not moving forward, kindly suggest any more configuration need for this requirement.
    Thanks for your advance help.
    Regards,
    Lakshmi.

    Hi Lakshmi,
    There are quite a few settings to be maintained. I do not remember exact sequence of steps but here are a few pointers.
    1. Investment profile needs to be created with 'line item settlement'
    2. AUC asset class to be created and assigned to this investment profile
    3. Investment profile to be linked to project profile.
    4. Source structure to be assigned to investment profile
    There may be other steps I am missing but I hope these help.
    Also, if you mention any error that you are facing or at which point you are getting stuck, it would be helpful.
    Regards

  • Reverse Asset AUC settlement with Internal order

    Hi Experts,
    User wrongly assigned Asset Internal Order to Expense GL Code, therefore we would like to reverse all the AUC settlement pertaining to that Internal Order. When we execute KO88, reversal its appearing one of the settlement.
    Please advise what are steps required to do complete reverse for all settlement with pertaining to that Internal Order and Asset.
    Thanks
    Srinu

    Hi:
        Can you please check AIST for reversal..
        Regards

  • Settlement thru KO8G

    A WBS actual settlement  through KO8G is throughing an error - ''Acquisition value negative in area 01". What does it mean? Does it mean that actual settlement not possible to AUCs assets.
    I see for Book Value (01), for the particular assets there is only planned value and no posted value.
    Thanks all for the help.
    Regards
    Bharat

    Hi
    plz check if for that particular asset any negative acquisition are alloawed. in asset accounting there is any option of this type.plz check in Ab08 any negative acquisition posting have been done for that particulat asset.
    kalidindi

  • Asset settlment with KO8G and KO88

    Dear Experts,
    What is the difference between asset settlement by KO88 and KO8G.
    If i am using investment profile then is it compulsory to use KO8G.
    If i am not using any AUC asset and iam booking exp for an order and settling the same to final asset what is the impact.

    Hi Sekhar,
    KO88 is used for settling 1 order (more day to day work)          used settlement to final asset
    KO8G is used periodical to select a group of internal orders     used periodical posting for AUC
    You need AUC for the reason that you post costs on your internal order on a 4.... cost account but at that moment it is not real costs but an asset AUC that should be posted on a 1..... balance sheet account.
    With the monthly settlement you post the cost to 0 on the balance sheet account
    1 Invoice
    4......  deb  Internal order costs
    1....... cred Vendor
    2 Monthly settlement
    1......  deb AUC
    49999 Settlement cost internal orders
    3 Final settlement
    1......  deb Final asset
    1......  cred AUC
    When you don't do step 2 you have this in costs and you don't want that.

  • Vendor open item amount to settle with two different banks  in F110.

    Hi
    Actually client requirement is one vendor line item to settle two different banks. Is there possible in APP program TC F110?
    How we can configure and how to settle one line item with two different banks in APP program.
    Please give me suggestions as soon as possible.
    Venkatesh
    Edited by: vdd08381 on Nov 5, 2011 1:19 PM
    Edited by: vdd08381 on Nov 5, 2011 1:20 PM

    Hi,
    Actually client requirement to work on one line item to settle two different banks.
    Once we have done partial payment to vendor can not give to cheque to vendors. My point view this is not possible.
    Is there any option please post the customization?
    Venkatesh
    Edited by: vdd08381 on Nov 7, 2011 5:36 AM

  • How to change the IO status to CLOSE after it has been settled through ko8g

    hi ,
    I have the following scenario : An internal order is assigned to a PO and after setllement of such an order i need to CLOSE the order .
    The PO has a GR done (no IR) . Currently Internal Order is in the status : TECO [technically complete] and setlement has ben doneusing Actual Settlemnet Run using KO8G.
    Now i need to change the IO status to  [ CLOSE ] : it is gving an error in KO02 : Balance is not zero .
    How  to change the Internal Order status to CLOSE or rather how to make teh balance in that Order toZero?
    Is it reqd to process some GR's for teh same PO ?
    Thansk
    Trina

    Hi,
    Check the order balance in Ko02
    Menu -->  Extras  -->  Order Balance if balance exist it means that the order has not completely settled.
    Regards,
    Raj

  • Consignment Settlement with Commission?

    Dear Folks,
    I would like to deduct 20% off the settlement amount when performing settlement via MRKO?
    Is this possible? If not, is there any other way to achieve this?
    The business scenario is such that when I sell vendor consignment goods, the vendor will give me 20% commission. I will only need to pay 80% of the amount to the vendor.
    Also, can the 20% be posted to a commission account?
    Best Regards
    Junwen

    The obvious answer is create condition type to reflect the commissions and add it to the pricing procedure with appropriate account settings.. This will allow you to enter the commission in the Consignment info-record. Then the MRKO settlement will include that too.

  • Rebate Final Settlement with 0 payment

    Hi,
    I have been looking into the process of how to close out old agreements so that nothing more will post to them and remove open accruals.  I was using the icons Final Settlement and Execute Settlement for this purpose.   The Excecute Settlement can be used to enter the amount you wish to pay out on the agreement at the time of closing.  However it wont let me put 0 in if we just want to clear out open accruals and make no further payment on the rebate upon closing it.
    I have found information on the SAP library stating the following options which sounds exactly what I need to happen however I cannot see where I can "click Change Status in the assignment block Item in the rebate agreement, and for single items if you click Change Status in the item details"
    - the only Status I can see on the agreement is in the front screen of VBO2 in the control data secton of the agreement called "Agreement Status" and none of the options below are listed.
    Can someone tell me how to access the status described below or how I should find it?
    Thanks for your help
    SAP Library Info
    You have released the rebate agreements that you want to settle. You release a rebate agreement by setting a final release status. You can set the following final release statuses for all agreement items if you click Change Status in the assignment block Item in the rebate agreement, and for single items if you click Change Status in the item details:
    ○       Release All Items for Final Settlement /Release Item for Final Settlement
    Set this status to release items for final settlement.
    After final settlement, a settlement document is generated, rebates are paid out, accruals are resolved and the items are closed.
    ○       Cancel All Items Without Recall / Cancel Item Without Recall
    Set this status to release items for final settlement at a value of zero without recalling any rebates that have already been paid out.
    After final settlement, a settlement document with a value of zero is generated, no rebates are paid out, accruals are resolved, and the items are closed.
    ○       Cancel All Items With Recall / Cancel Item With Recall
    Set this status to release items for final settlement at a value of zero with a recall of rebates that have already been paid out.
    After final settlement, debit memos for all rebates already paid out for the items are generated and sent to the customer, accruals are resolved and the items are closed.

    Hello Tracey,
    You can simply maintain rebate agreement status as B - Agreement released for settlement in your desired rebate agreement for closure or not in use for future.
    Hope this can assist you.
    Thanks & Regards
    JP

  • DSD route settlement with multiple sales are

    Hi folks,
    I have looked in this forum for an answer for my problem but haven't found any, so i am creating this new thread.
    Well i am trying to settle a shipment in /DSD/DE_ENTRY transaction with multiple sales area in it, example:
    Visit 1 - Sales Org(D002) Distribution channel(GN) Division(GA)
    Visit 2 - Sales Org(D002) Distribution channel(GN) Division(GB)
    Visit 3 - Sales Org(D017) Distribution channel(17) Division(D1)
    The problem i get is that when i settle the shipment he mixes up the sales area in the visits, so far, allways in visit 3 where he puts up D002, 17, D1, giving the error of non existent sales area when trying to create the order(he doesn't mix up for all orders, only for some ones in the visit).
    Another strange fact is that i made 3 shipments with same data, and in all 3, he mixed up for different documents, in 1 he created 2 documents fine, in other one only 1, making me believe that he "randomly" atributes the sales area.
    What i need is to "manipulate" or have a solution for standard doesn't mix up the sales area, and atribute the correct sales area to the orders to create based on the sales are in the visit.
    Best Regards.

    Thanks for the link, it's more or less the functionality that I'm looking for but the issue with BW is that I need to do the Settlement at the moment that routes are arriving "on line" and with BW I need wait the load to BW system. A lot of routes are arriving frequently.
    ¿Do you know a R3 functionality for this? or ¿do you know a "Shipments settlement" who has all Shipments of the route? in order to use same transaction that is by transport.
    Thank's a lot

  • Rebate settlement with $0 value

    There are instances with a rebate agreement, that the business will decide they no longer require a rebate. The remaining balance would not be issued to the customer; but returned to the business. My user want to settle the rebate agreement by create credit memo with ZERO value. But sytem not allowing to create credit memo with ZERO value.
    Kindly help me to address this issue and where is the control.

    For this you can do simply delete a rebate agreement.
    To do that, in the Change rebate agreement screen, enter the number of the rebate agreement that you want to settle or determine the number by using the matchcodes.
    Press ENTER .
    Select Agreement - Delete.
    The system prompts you to confirm the deletion of the rebate agreement.
    Press ENTER to delete the rebate agreement.
    Result:
    The rebate agreement receives status C (settlement created).
    The system uses a credit memo request to remove the accruals created on the basis of the rebate agreement.
    You can display the credit memo request for the rebate agreement via Payment - Rebate documents.
    Regards
    JP

  • AuC settlement with internal order

    friends,
    while settling AUC with interanal order in settlement rule i have given 100%, but after executing the settlement it is splitting the amount in three gl accounts, i created this internal order with type 0600 and object class - investment.
    regards,

    Hi,
    In the Allocation Structure you might have maintained these cost elements against the receiver.
    Thanks,
    Giridhar

Maybe you are looking for