Settling delivery costs via ERS

Hi Gurus,
MRRL transaction has a check box stating "Settle Goods Item + Planned Delivery Costs". Even if it is checked, I am finding ERS invoices are NOT being generated for freight costs. For eg, the ERS PO has FRB1 pricing condition. GR of both the material and freight pricing condition is performed. After that , MRRL T.code is executed with "Settle Goods Item + Planned Delivery costs" checked. But, it is found that ERS material invoice is generated, but NOT the freight one. Why "Planned delivery costs" is mentioned then in MRRL T.code?
Thanks,
Kumar

First of all I would like you to check if the all involved vendors have activated automatic settlement of planned delivery cost in
customizing (Table T169DC). The entries in EKRSDC are only create if this this setting is set ON. The path is: SPRO -> Material
Management -> Logistic Invoice Verification -> Evaluated Receipt Settl. -> Specify Automatic Settlement of Planned Delivery Costs.
Hope this helps !
Cheers !

Similar Messages

VI01 as delivery costs in MIGO

Hi all,
We have to change de Automatic PO generated in Shipment costs for Shipment costs as delivery costs during goods receipt.
We have applied de SAP Note 427944.
. M/06
Condition type: 'B' delivery costs (T685A-KNTYP field)
Accrual: 'X' (T685A-KRUEK field)
Copy shp.costs: 'X' (T685A-BNKTK field)
. Entries in the calculation schema: (IMG -> Materials Management -> Purchasing -> Conditions -> Define Price- Determination Process -> Define Calculation Schema)
In the calculation schema, an
1. Account key (T683S-KVSL1 field)
2. Account key - accruals/provisions (Field T683S-KVSL2)
must be specified for the corresponding condition type (similar to the FRB1 condition type in schema RM0000). Note that this condition is always marked as 'statistical' in the condition screen of the purchase order regardless of the settings in the price schema because it is an accrual.
. Purchase order: The condition type should not be valuated in the purchase order item, that is, the condition value is 0.
. Shipment status: The overall status of the shipment cost calculation for all affected
shipments must be 'C' (that is, complete).
Calculated      C Fully calculated
Assigned        C Account assignment fully completed
Transferred     C transferred
. In T_56 the
u201D Rate of Automatic Processingu201D V_TVFTK-PRZST is D Release shipment cost item
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is A relevant for settlement (delivery costs) them the status are only
Calculated      C Fully calculated     but in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is X relevant for settlement (G/L account) them the status are
Calculated      C Fully calculated
Assigned        C Account assignment fully completed
Transferred     A Not transferred   and in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS
The process is :
ME21N
VL31N
VT02N (automatically)
VI01 (no PO automatically as before)
MIGO material GR for the inbound delivery of VL31N AND accounting of the delivery costs. THE ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS is missing why??
Someone can help?
Cheers
marta

Hi,
Just to clarify my questions. In the note 427944 explain that
1 . Shipment status: The overall status of the shipment cost calculation for all affected shipments must be 'C' (that is, complete).
*It means that the 3 status must be : Calculated C Fully calculated + Assigned C Account assignment fully completed + Transferred C transferred ?*
Other thing:
2 *. In T_56 the u201D Rate of Automatic Processingu201D V_TVFTK-PRZST must be D Release shipment cost item?*
3. In T_56 If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is A relevant for settlement (delivery costs) them the status showed in VI01 are only Calculated C Fully calculated b
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is X relevant for settlement (G/L account) them in VI01 the status are Calculated C Fully calculated /Assigned C Account assignment fully completed / Transferred A Not transferred. *Why I can not do the transfer?*
as is Transferred A Not transferred them in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS.
Could you help me with one of these three questions?
Thank you very much,
marta

Entering delivery costs in stock transfer order

I am entering delivery costs via a condition type in a stock transfer order. When I am doing MIGO, AUM key gets invoked which is a price difference key. How do I enter delivery costs in a sto order without the aum key getting invoked because really freight or delivery charges should not be hitting the price difference account
thanks

Understood why system does that

Error doing ERS for planned delivery costs

Hello!
We post the freight for STOs via the FRB1 condition as our delivery costs. The freight vendor is of course, different from the vendor in the STO itself which is the plant. The freight vendor is marked for ERS settlement and the ERS works fine for it from the shipment cost documents of sales orders. However, while doing the ERS in transaction MRRL for the same freight vendor for planned delivery costs, nothing comes up in the list to settle. The delivery has been goods issued and freight accounted for. What could be going wrong here? What do I need to check?
Thanks!

OK, I got this issue resolved...don't know what was wrong and I didn't change anything but it is working now Freaky. But I do have one more related issue - hopefully someone can shed some light on it. For the freight vendor, we have a different PI partner in the vendor master set up by the plants - when I do the ERS, it is not creating the A/P against that different Invoicing Party (PI) - it is creating the A/P for the same freight vendor code...any clue what is needed to make it create the A/P for the different Invoicing Party that we have set up?
Thanks!

ERS and delivery costs

Hi guys,
We have following two problems in case of ERS vendors.
1) We have certain delivery costs also in purchase order. The same vendor will receive material payment and freight related payments. In MRRL transaction, we select "Selected goods items + Planned del costs" and run MRRL. But after this also, amount excluding freight amount is posted in the invoice and delivery cost is not being picked for invoice. How to get material cost + delivery cost also in one invoice
2) In another scenario, we have different freight vendor. For this we are configuring ERS for delivery costs also. But the problem is in configuration we have to mention the vendor code in "Specify Automatic Settlement of Planned Delivery Costs". Can we give vendor code as " * " here? Or is there any other way of doing configuration without mentioning vendor code and it is applicable for all vendors ?
Please suggest the solution for the above two problems.

Hi Pankaj,
Thanks for ur reply. This will work. But my problem is with this, we have to include all the freight vendors in configuration. But we do not know how many vendors are there for the company. If any new vendor is created, who has to enter this in the configuration..
Is there any other way of making this functionality applicable for all vendors.
Other problem is in our PO we have basic rate and 3 to 4 delivery costs,. We have made 103 and then 105 and run ERS run and arranged payment to material vendor (it is same for both material and freight)
But for some reason we are making return delivery against material document with 105 movement. When we run MRRL for this, it will generate credit memo for the quantity returned to vendor. But delivery costs are also added. We want to avoid delivery costs in credit memo and it should only take material cost
How to acheive this? Please help me out

MRRL MRDC Automatic settlement of delivery costs

I have a question regarding ERS and fixed delivery costs.
We want to use ERS for a service with orderquantity independent costs and order quantity dependent costs. The purchase order is created based on an external operation from a production order. Initially the purchase order is created for the planned quantity of the production order.
Realized quantities can and will deviate from the planned quantities. The realized quantities are posted to both production order and purchase order.
Eg.:
Production order for 10 PC --> purchase order for service of 10 PC.
Cost of service is 0,1 per PC + 5 Eur per order--> for this order this means 0,1*10 + 5 = 6 Eur
Now 15 PC have been realized and posted GR for the purchase order.
Using ERS with MRRL with option Settle goods items and delivery costs has following results:
15 * 0,10 --> 1,5
15 * 0,5 --> 7,5
I expect the system to post 1,5 + 5 Eur.
Is that possible? How can I realize that?
thanks for any help
Jean

no, SAP does not know this kind of fixed conditions.
even a fixed condition is depended on the quantity, and adjusted to the GR quantity if it differs from PO quantity.

ERS for Return Items with Planned Delivery Costs also as credit

Hi
I have the requirement to process ERS-Returns (MRRL) where I need to have a credit memo for the product cost and the planned delivery costs incurred with the original order. ($15,000 for product and $1200 for delivery costs = Credit Memo for $16,200) I have tested this extensively but in all situations the planned delivery costs creates an 'invoice' not a credit memo.
Has anybody encountered this requirement? If so, were you able to resolve without implementing an enhancement?
Thanks.

For delivery costs you need to maintain the following customizing:
> OLMR
    > Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS)
      > Specify Automatic Settlement of Planned Delivery Costs
The flag controls whether to include or exclude planned delivery costs
from automatic settlement.
Regarding the planned delivery cost, it will not listed in
transaction MRRL. This is the standard SAP design. Instead, please
use transaction MRDC.

Planned Delivery Cost Settlement (MDRC)

Hi All,
I tired so many ways to settle planned delivery costs through MDRC since ERS don't settle the delivery costs. I keep getting "No values for this selection" msg. I made sure I fill in the correct information at the intial screen.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks!

Hi Duke
I still unable to see MDRC tcode anywhere....
i have not understood ur query also, if u want to settle planned delivery cost it will be captured at the time of GR to freight clearing account.
The stock account is debited with the planned delivery costs at goods receipt and the system makes the offsetting posting to a freight clearing account. This posting is then cleared by an offsetting entry to the vendor account at invoice receipt.
Regards
Yogesh

Automatic settlement of delivery costs MRDC for service PO

Hi,
We configured a custom condition type ZCOM (Commission). This condition was assigned to pricing procedure RM0000. This condition is defined as a delivery cost condition with accrual.
PO for non-inventory material:
- Free text item for 10 EA @ $100/EA
- ZCOM condition added at the item level for 10% ($100). Vendor in this condition is different that PO vendor.
- GR for 1 EA
- PO history shows: GR (101) for 1 EA with total value $100. It also shows DCGR for 1 EA in the delivery cost quantity and value $10.
Run automatic delivery cost settlement (MRDC): It created invoice for the freight vendor using the delivery cost amount of $10. In PO history it shows: DCIn for 1 EA in delivery quantity field and amount of $10.
PO for services:
- Free text service for 10 EA @ $100/EA.
- ZCOM condition added at the item level (not at the service level) for 10% (value $100).
- Service entry sheet for 1 EA with value $100
- PO history shows: SEnt for $100. GR (101) for $100. It also shows DCGR for 1 AU in the delivery cost quantity and amount of $10.
Run automatic delivery cost settlement (MRDC): It created invoice for the freight vendor NOT using the delivery cost amount of $10. It created an invoice for the full line item amount of $100. PO history shows: DCIn for 1 AU in delivery quantity field and amount of $100. This is wrong. It should have created the invoice only for $10.
Any help on what is going on it is greatly appreciated.
Thanks and regards, Jose Oyon.

no, SAP does not know this kind of fixed conditions.
even a fixed condition is depended on the quantity, and adjusted to the GR quantity if it differs from PO quantity.

Planned delivery Cost invoice verification via LIV EDI

I have to verify the planned delivery cost in purchase order ( freight condition types). The invoice sent by the vendors via EDI ,have both material & freight cost. Unfortunately SAP doesnt allow to verify the planned freight cost via EDI. Is there a way to post freight costs along with material cost in EDI
Has anybody used the BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE for delivery cost invoice verification using data from the invoice idoc.

Hello
Purchase order: 100 pcs @ 1.3/pc
Planned delivery costs: 0.10/pc
Goods receipt for that PO: 100 pc
A/C postings @ GR
Stock account: 140 Dr
GR/IR clearing: 130 Cr
Freight clearing: 10 Cr
Invoice 100 pc @ 1.3/pc=130.00
freight @ 0.10/pc= 10.00
Total =140.00
A/C posting @ IR
Vendor a/c's: 140 Cr (130 for Goods vendor and 10 for freight vendor)
GR/IR clearing: 130 Dr
Freight clearing: 10 Dr
Since both are different vendors you have to credit the goods value to vendor A and freight charges to vendor B, you have to do them separately.
Regards
Gregory Mathews

Planned delivery cost & sub-sequent settlements

hi ,
what is meant by planned delivery cost ?
what is meant by sub-sequent settlements ?
when they are useful in MM
regards

Hi
<b>Planned delivery costs</b> are the costs agreed with the vendor or goods supplier before the purchase order is created. You enter these as conditions in the purchase order.
Planned delivery costs can be differentiated as follows:
Origin of Costs
Freight charges
Customs charges
Calculation of Costs
Fixed amount, irrespective of delivered quantity
Quantity-dependent amount
<b>Subsequent adjustment</b>
In sub contracting scenario After the subcontractor had delivered the ordered material , you post the goods receipt to the subcontract PO. The system determines the necessary components for each purchase order item and creates for each component a goods issue item with the quantity that was determined in the purchase order
If the vendor informs you after these postings that a greater or smaller quantity of the subcontracting components was actually consumed than planned in the purchase order, you must post a subsequent adjustment to correct the component consumption.
If the component is a by-product, you must post the corrected by-product receipt (excess receipt) or by-product issue (short receipt)
Similary there is a subsequent credit / debit carried out when an additional invoice or credit memo is received for a transaction that has already been invoiced in LIV process
Thanks & regards
Kishore

How to Archive PO for which delivery costs has not been settled ?

Hi dear experts,
For Intra company STO, documents weren't getting archived due to the error message.Scenario is mentioned below.
During pretreatment of MM_EKKO archiving object (TA: SARA), I get an amazing huge amount of PO position which can not be archived due to "*Delivery costs have not been cleared*".
I tried several ways to find out how to solve this issue but without any success.
Point is that we do not clear delivery cost regarding those PO positions.
It means that those PO's won't never be cleared.
Any ideas about how I can fix this issue?
Best regards,
Deepak

Dear Jurgen,
Scenario is as follows:
An Intra company STO is created without delivery costs.
Next step is delivery creation.
Shipment is created with creation of shipment cost document
The shipment costs are distributed accordingly to the items in the PO and they're stamped back in the PO with the condition type ZFRB(copy of FRB1)
This will act as a reference and added to the material cost in the receiving plant.
As the shipment cost document creates a service PO and its cleared with a Invoice being posted in MIRO and subsequently in FI,they aren't clearing the value which is open in the Original stock transport order.
Regards,
Deepak

Delivery Costs using MRRL

Hi All,
I have configured the Vendor/s in the Automatic Settlement for Delivery Costs. All vendors are marked as ERS, transaction code is configured and number range has been created.
I now have the the PO coming up when I run MRDC however I get "Document does not have any items". I have a sneaking feeling that its because the condition is marked as Statistical. Can any one help me with this and advise how I could uncheck the Statistical check on the condition record if this is the case.
Look forward to your responses and advise.

I have a question here . Are you using 2 different vendors one for PO and one for Delivery cost?
Please refer [ERS Settlement|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/20c57f75-d26f-2910-c3aa-dee124530121?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true]
[ERS|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4019cf83-d650-2c10-e99b-83ae9ee2346e?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true]
Document selection critieria also plays an important role in the intil screen.
Hope it helps
Edited by: Karthik on Aug 11, 2011 10:43 AM

Planned Delivery Costs Posting in MRRL

Hello Experts,
We have ERS active in our system for regular consumprion items. These are the items where the price settled is inclusive of packing anf forwarding charges. There is no issue of LIV for these invoices.
But when in a Purchase order any other charges are loaded such as Packing, Forwarding etc. these charges fall under planned delivery costs in terms of LIV. And these charges are not captured at the time of LIV through ERS.
Does anybody aware of any userexit or SAP note which will help me capturing these charges in ERS as well.
Early response will be appreciated as I want to transfer all plant purchases' invpoice verification on ERS.
Thnaks & Regards,
Rahul Puranik.

As per SAP Standard system, it is not possible to post the planned deliver cost thro' ERS or by MRRL.

Distribute planned delivery cost into all open POs when post FI vendor invo

Hi,
We planned transport cost in PO usning condition type but we post the freight invoice monthly for freight vendor using F-43 with out refernce to POs.
So POs always expect a freight invoce,ends up with GR/IR clearing balance and so we can't archive these POs now.
Now we are looking for a new solution that to distribute monthly freight invoice amt into all those open invoices when we post a FI freight invoice for vendor (F-43).
Please do suggest any user exit or BADI to check for open POs for that vendor when post F-43.
hope to hear your reply soon. Thanks in Advance
Regards,
Jagadheshwar

Hi
Since it is planned delivery cost, I belive the Freight posting would have happened at MIGO itself.... i.e. the Freight amount would have been inventorized or posted into consumption account in the case of account assigned PO... Is this understandng correct?
If yes, then ideally you should be passing entry using F-02, Dr the GR/IR account and Crediting the Vendor account... Allow manual posting for GR/IR in FS00... populate the PO No in GR/IR account while doing the posting.... Then you can clear them...
Ideally, you should not have had planned delvery cost, if you are not booking the invoice PO wise....
If you are getting the freight invoice for each PO separately, you can do ERS (Evaluated Receipt Settlement)... Which means system would automatically Dr the Gr/IR and Credit the vendor.... You dont need to wait for the invoice.... This is usually done for trusted vendors
Br, Ajay M

Settling delivery costs via ERS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for