Simple but reliable small office setup

Hi group,
I need some advice on setting up a simple but reliable small office wireless network. Up until now, we had a consumer AP combined with wired connections. However, we're moving to a new office where it's difficult to implement a wired network and we decided to implement a good quality wireless network.
So, I was looking into business quality wireless AP's and it looks as if the Aironet 1600 is an interesting option. However, I'm not a (wireless) network specialist and have no knowledge of controlled AP's.
The office is (only) 278 square meters (24 x 11.6), divided in two main areas by a supporting wall with two large doorways. I would like to keep the setup costs to a minimum, ideally using only 1 AP. This might mean placing the AP on the ceiling near the dividing wall (which is roughly in the middle), or on the wall itself.
We need to support fast wireless connections from 15 laptop computers now, and up to 25 in the near future. Also, we'd like to support 15-25 mobile devices, i.e. tablets or smart phones.
I've found some info on the differences between the AIR-CAP1602 and AIR-SAP1602 models, as well as the Internal and External antenna versions. It seems to me we could use the Standalone (SAP1602) model. However, I don't have enough knowledge to determine if the Aironet 1600 is actually appropriate for our requirements and if yes, which model.
I would very much appreciate your advice!

A 1600 would work or even a 2600. I prefer the 2600/3600 though but cost is your concern. I would also place the AP on the ceiling but belies the ceiling maybe in the middle if possible. Don't place the AP above the ceiling because you will loose coverage. Internal antennas are fine and just to note, rule of thumb is 25 users per AP so just in case you need more throughput, maybe using two separated by 3-5 meters would help also. If the 1600's are the choice for you then look at having one or two APs.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

Similar Messages

  • Integrating a Domain controller into a small office setup

    So this is where I am:
    I am trying to integrate a windows 2012 server which I can use as my domain controller in our office and run active directory from it, then eventually group policy, wsus, microsoft deployments and windows deployment toolkits etc.
    However because our current Mitel 3300 phone system sets the phone DHCP I don't want to mess the current network arrangement up.
    This is the internal structure:
    Our internet router's IP address 172.16.21.1
    Mitel 3300 Box IP address 192.168.10.10
    Default gateway 192.168.0.1
    So our IP phones sit on the subnet of 192.168.10.xxx and our PC's grab IP's such as 192.168.0.xxx up to 192.168.0.254.
    What should I set my DHCP settings on the Domain controller to see the PC's on the current network, and or the DNS settings as I am fairly new to this.
    If I havent explained anything properly please let me know and I will provide more info, thanks.
    Jan

    are all devices on the same backbone with two different subnets on it?
    Are phone and computer both DHCP clients i.e. no have static addresses?
    In server 2012 r2 DHCP you have the ability to rules  so the phones can get ip addresses from the phone system and the computers can get ip addresses for the Domain controller.
    Are you sure the phone system is DHCP for both and not your firewall? with two network adapters? or phone system one and firewall another dhcp?
    typically if you phone system is giving out DHCP it would need two ip addresses and interfaces to be able to host both subnets.

  • How to setup a small office network

    Hello,
    I am looking to setup a small office network comprising 6 G4 macs (existing computers) that have been upgraded to the newest OS version. What is the best way to go about networking these computers together in terms of being able to share files, internet connection, access to peripherals and also implementing a firewall.
    Any suggestions or help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you

    1, Get a cable internet ISP account; depending on your service you should be able to secure a 5Mbps down and 2Mbps up on the cable e.g. Cox or Comcast.
    2. Get a good router. The mass market Linksys and Netgear routers aren't very good in terms of reliability. I use a ZyXEL P-330W router is the best I've ever seen. Its reliable and very efficient in terms of throughout. The Apple Airport Extreme is good.
    3. Set up the router to support UPnP. This way all computers will be able to share iChatAV video conferencing. If you enabled "port forwarding" only one Mac would be able to use iChatAV video conferencing.
    4. Set up your router for DHCP to dynamically issue Internet address to all your computers.
    5. Setup the wireless router for encryption such as WPA. This will encrypt wireless communication.
    6. Setup the wireless router for only your computers. You'll have to get the MAC/AirPort ID network addresses as expressed in terms of an xx:xx:xx:xx address. You can get this thru your Systems Preferences -> Network window -> AirPort (in the sidebar) -> Advanced button.
    7. If you have Ethernet in your office then skip steps 5 and 6 above.
    8. On each computer open up the System Preferences -> Sharing and check-off the File Sharing. Set your user access preferences appropriately.
    9. Get a Network enabled All-in-one printer and setup Printer Sharing options. Hook-it up to your network and add your printer by clicking on the "+" sign in your "Print and Fax" Preferences.
    10. Don't enable Apple Firewall on each Mac. The router will be the Firewall.
    Ok. That's the short-hand.. plug it all in and go!

  • Small Office Network Setup Help

    Hi folks,
    We are renting a small office in a floor which consists of many offices. The way internet is distributed here is, they have a verizon fios router and a couple of unmanaged switch, from which cables are run to offices for internet. One of the port on a switch is dedicated to our office.
    In our office we have 6 computers and a network printer. The computers need to share files with each other and be able to print.
    We want to isolate our office network from others. When we use an unmanaged switch, the version router dhcp assigns ip addresses to computers and we are able to access the internet. The verizon local ip is: 192.168.1.xxx. But we can also see computers that are of other offices, which means they can see us.
    How do we create a separate network? Say we want to use  IP 192.168.10.XXX or 10.0.0.xxx. We just bought a 24 port managed (L2) switch.
    Thanks

    Hello, rjbm_exact. 
    You definitely need a managed switch and a Cisco Small Business (200 or 300 series) can meet your requirements. You can setup separate VLAN to segregate user access level. Are you also looking at expanding your wireless (guest access)?
    Let me know if you need more assistance or e-mail ([email protected]) me directly. Kind regards. 

  • Setup Lion Server for use in Small Office of Windows & Mac Clients

    I've purchased a Mac Mini Server with Lion Server installed to be used in my small office of less than 10 people.
    The primary goal of this server is to used for File Sharing, bother locally, and remotely.
    In the process of setting up Lion Server I have come across a couple things that I am confused about.
    The first is Open Directory.
    It is my understanding that this is not a necessary setup for the number of users in my office, however I set it up anyway as it appeared to be something that would be useful in the future.
    I have come across information that states Lion Server will not be accessible for Windows users connected via Open Directory. Thus my inclination is to disable the service, and set up my users as local users.
    My question is, for local and remote File Sharing, is there any benefit to using Open Directory?
    The second has to do with Remote Access.
    I am familiar with the notion of a VPN, but I need some clarification as to my remote access options.
    When I go to setup my Server's hostname, I am presented with three options. 1) Host name for local network, 2) Host name for private network, and 3) Host name for Internet.
    I have a domain name for my company's website, so I set up a subdomain (server.mycompany.com), asked my ISP for a Static WAN IP, and pointed thesubdomain to said IP using my DNS. Thus this appears to be option number 3; to allow users to connect to my server from the local network, as well as the Internet.
    My question is, how does this differ from a VPN both in setup, as well as method with which users will access the server? Is there a benefit to one over the other? I would Google this to find an answer, but I can't seem to find a name for what this setup is called.
    I very much appreciate any help you can provide.
    Thanks.

    Well, I spoke too soon.  Lion Server is unstable, awkward and is far too limited to qualify as an Apple product. Even though there's quite a few enhancements, the omissions of technologies in the server 10.6 edition makes this "server" a no go for us.
    Even after installing mysql, I still cannot run a Joomla website on Lion server as it should be done. The wiki's a nice thing to have, but isn't a "professional grade" solution.  There's too much iOS as well.
    With that said, I think it's a shame that apple would put customers through so much frustration and disappointment by releasing such a lame product. In order for us to use Lion server, we would have to be able to run a second (totally separate) instance of Apache. It also appears that server settings are changing to the extent that services become inaccessible as the system is running.

  • Just bought a 3TB Time Capsule for a small office. Will have 4 users with MacBooks. What would ne the best setup for time machine individual backups and internet sharing in a secure way?

    Just bought a 3TB Time Capsule for a small office. Will have 4 users with MacBooks. What would ne the best setup for time machine individual backups and internet sharing in a secure way?

    Set up each Mac for Time Machine backups in the normal way.  Time Machine will keep each backup separate on the Time Capsule, so users will only be able to see the backups of their own Mac.
    Yes....there are convoluted workarounds that might allow one user to see the backups of another.....IF...they know the administrator password of the "other" Mac.
    As far as Internet sharing, all users will have access to the Internet if they have a wired or wireless connection. If a Mac connects using wireless, it is possible to limit the time that they are allowed to connect to the network.
    For example, you might limit the ability to connect to the wireless from say each Weekday from 8 AM to 6 PM.
    With a wired Ethernet connection, you cannot limit access times to the Internet.

  • Setting up a small office network - advice needed

    We are to move our small office (3 people) from a shared office environment to our own office space. That has the huge advantage that we´ll finally be Mac-only, but the agreeable disadvantage that there is no longer a networking professional around. And this is where I enter. I now have to find a solution on how to set up the network, and I do not have experience in that field (though I am fairly experienced with OSX).
    As of today we have a G5 iMac, a G4 powermac and a G4 iBook. In the not too far future we will be getting a proper G5 powermac as well.
    The G4 is used for low key office applications, Word and Mail mostly. The iMac is the workhorse that runs all graphic/video applications. It also is used for presentations once in a while, so that this machine is not always available. The iBook is used for writing and e-mail plus some light-weight field editing.
    I would like to find a solution that we could store all important files on one computer, so that it would be easier to make regular back-ups. And everyone could easily access those files.
    It would be great if data from iCal and Adress Book could also be stored centrally, such as that addresses are available for everyone, and updated calenders are available for all employees.
    As the budget should be as small as possible, I was wondering if we could use the G4 powerbook (867mhz, 1gig memory) to run a sharing service in the background. Then I could also install a second harddisk and use both hdd as a backing-up-raid. Once in a while I would make a backup on a external firewire disk.
    Is this a possible solution, or should we rather have one machine dedicated as a server. Would it be sufficient then to use the G4 as that server and buy a MacMini or iMac as the office machine?
    Since it is a small network, would I still need an OSX server license, or is the standard OSX enough for this?
    iMac G5 20, G4 QS 867mhz, iBook G4, PB 190, and a Pentium that I haven't switched on in months...   Mac OS X (10.4.3)   Experienced with technology, just not with networking...

    There are two ways to set up a network:
    1 peer-to-peer
    2 client-server
    Peer-to-peer is cheaper, but not reliable. Apple supports peer-to-peer in OS X. (In fact, in all versions of the Mac OS since System 7.) You can have up to 10 users connected to any one machine using peer-to-peer. (Warning... if you have more than five users, that machine is going to get slow.) The various peers are used as normal workstations while sharing. You have three peers, and may get one or two more, so you can use peer-to-peer. Just don't overdo it. Your planed usage of a few Word docs and a few graphics files sounds about right.
    Under OS X the peers are limited to sharing specific folders only, unless they use 3rd-party software such as SharePoint, which allows the sharing of any and all folders.
    It seems that you plan to use the G4 as a 'server' using peer-to-peer. You also seem to be planing to add additional drives, and RAID. I'd get a high end IDE PCI card, or a FireWire card, or a SCSI card, for the G4. Depending on which G4 you have, you can stick up to four hard drives in the case if you go IDE or internal FireWire or SCSI. External SCSI or FireWire drive configuratins are limited only by the drive slots available (7 for low-end SCSI, 15 for high-end SCSI, 63 for FireWIre) and the space available. (And, of course, the budget availanle...) You can get dedicated RAID controllers.
    For backup I'd get DVD or tape. Tape holds more and is easier to use, but is expensive (you have no idea how expensive, but I suspect you'll find out) and can be finicky. DVD is a lot cheaper, but it's slow, and someone will have to sit and feed discs into the machine. This will get old really fast. If your backup requirements are modest, DVDs might do, but probably you'll need something else. You could just buy an external hard disk and back up to that...
    Apple charges US$500 for OS X Server 10 seat version. (They charge $1000 for the 255-seat version.) OS X Server should run on the G4, and will turn it into a full-fledged server.
    Any of the O'Reilly books on OS X Server and/or on Samba should help you get started. O'Reilly's _Using Samba_ has a section devoted specifically to SMB on OS X Server which should be quite helpful.

  • Small office network questions

    I have a small office with 4-5 mac computers. I have a Mac mini set up as a file server and I use a standard cable connection for my internet service. I use a wired router (ethernet cables) all going to a netgear switch.
    Just bought a mac mini and a drobo storage device. I have successfully set up the drobo on the mac mini and I can "see" the files and read & write to the external drive. I also have a few other people in the office -- which will need access to the drobo via the network, but have a few questions there:
    1. I don't see the name of the other computers that can connect to the unit. When I get on one of the other machines and look for the drobo I can find it & edit files but from the mac-mini side, I can't see the proper name of the other computer. How do I do this?
    2. Can I limit which folders are accessible within the drobo that attached to the mac mini
    3. Am I missing anything from a safety standpoint? Can Anyone come into my office and access the files that are on the mac/mini drobo? Worse off, is the mac mini vulnerable to the outside world with this setup?
    Thanks for the help, new to all this networking stuff.

    It's been a week, so i don't know if you have already worked this out, but...
    while I am not familiar with your router, when I have used linksys before, i find it better to use static IP addresses for everything.  Try setting static IP addresses and make sure everyone's mask is 255.255.255.0.  Some routers also have a flag to allow computers to see each other.
    Best of luck.

  • Small office VoIP system

    Good morning everyone,
    I am currently defining the architecture for a very simple VoIP network that is to be installed in a small office (about 70 VoIP extensions). Initially, we don't want to include any special feature, just the internal voice IP service and the ability to make up to 4 simultaneous external phone calls through PSTN.
    We are going to acquire a Cisco 2921 Router, the SL-29-UC-K9 Unified Communications licence and a VIC2-4FXO. 
    I have been reading about ISR G2 licensing, but I am still not sure of fully understanding what we need for this project. My question is, does the UC licence for the Cisco 2921 include the FL-CME licence to use the Call Manager Express functionality? do we need something else? any special license for the FXOs functionality?
    Thank you for your help
    Pablo

    Thank you guys for your answers,
    Actually, it's my first contact as a developer with VoIP and UC Cisco technology... so I would like to keep it simple at the beginning: just internal voip phone calls and the possibility to ring pstn extensions. Our budget is very limited too... so I need to stick to the hardware that I told you in the previous message: 2921 + fxo card. 
    As far as I have read, SRST functionality is very useful when you have several nodes, to provide survival to each local node that loses connectivity with a centralized call manager. But in our scenario, with a single node... I think we can give up this functionality.
    So, we only have budget to purchase any other license that could be necessary to accomplish this small project. so the key question is: does SL-29-UC-K9 Unified Communications License include Call Manager Express functionality and the ability to use de FXO card to make pstn phone calls as well? because that will be more than enough for us...
    thank you very much
    Pablo

  • Small Office Switch Questions

    Hi Guys,
    Have a small office I need to setup with a few requirements.
    I need to replace some unmanaged switches with one or two managed devices to better facilitate bandwith and general managment. There will be 5/6 VLANS (VOIP, Users, Wifi, CCTV ect), between 24 and 48 workstations requiring gigabit speeds and around 15 VOIP phones and 5 IP Cameras.
    Due to costs, i'm quite happy to go with a 24port 1000base switch and a 48port 10/100base POE switch (as I can bounce lots of devices that don't need 1000 like printers and accesspoints down to the POE switch). I was looking originally at the 3750 series (1000 and 100 and using the stacking ports) but the cost may be a little high.
    Used switches are not a real problem (unless anyone can advise on some really good reasons why) so picking up old cat hardware and getting the latest images are a option. Ideally, I want to spend under 1500 USD on something like this, but if it could be sub $1000 that would be great. In terms of the POE device, it needs to be standard POE not Cisco Pre-Standard.
    Happy to keep in the same series even if it's older.
    I've seen the small business series, but it seems that by the time you spend the money on two switches, you're nearly upto the prices of two used cats.
    Any thoughts on those?
    Thanks.

    I was looking originally at the 3750 series (1000 and 100 and using the stacking ports) but the cost may be a little high.
    You will no longer be able to purchase FastEthernet 3750 as Cisco has announced the End-of-Sale of the 10/100BaseTx of the 3560 and 3750 since January 2011.  Cisco has also announced the End-of-Sale of the 3560G/E and 3750G/E back in March 2012.
    So this leaves you with the 3560X and the 3750X and I can assure you this variety doesn't come cheap at all. 
    This leaves you with the last remaining stack-capable model, the 2960S.  Like what Paul has said, the 2960S is a "triple speed" variety:  10/100/1000BaseTx.  You can have uplinks of 1 Gbps fibre or 10 Gbps fibre.  You can have "half" PoE or Full PoE.
    But what sets the 2960S different from the 3750X (in terms of stacking) is the amount of switches in a stack.  The 3750X can support up to nine but the 2960S can support up to four.  This factor was set deliberately to prevent potential users to choose the cheaper 2960S instead of the 3750X.

  • Branch Office setup

    Hello All.
    I have a problem with a branch office setup, and I can't for the life of me think of what the problem is.
    I have a remote office setup, using an ASA 5505 that is set up to establish an easy vpn connection to the central network.  The connection at the branch office is a 20/5 cable modem, the central network has a 25/25 fiber connection.
    The issue I have is this.  Wired clients work fine at this branch office, at least 95% of the time.  I have a lightweight AP there that can come up and join the controllers at the central network, no problem.  I haven't done anything with H-REAP because there are really no resources locally they need that would allow them to do their work, so all traffic is tunneled back to the WLC.
    Wireless clients can authenticate to the AP, and I can get 15-20ms ping responses from them all day.  Latency never comes close to the 600ms proposed limit with CAPWAP.  Yet, for some reason the performance of the clients is problematic.  Webpages will frequently not load correctly, they experience some freezing, and with one application we use - it refuses to load completely.
    If we bring these same computers to an AP connected to our central network, on the same SSID, they work flawlessly.
    Something about this particular location is causing a lot of grief for our users.
    For what it's worth, we are running WCS 7.0.230.0 and the WLCs are on 7.0.116.0.  The ASA is running a pretty basic configuration, pretty much out of the box with the easy vpn configuration entered.
    Any help on this would be appreciated, I am at my wit's end with this setup.

    Yes, 20/5 Download/Upload. 
    So I did as you suggested, here are the results with a 1400 byte packet:
    Ping statistics for 172.16.253.50:
        Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 99, Lost = 1 (1% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
        Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 2208ms, Average = 42ms
    That 2208ms response was an anomaly.  I ran it again and got this:
    Ping statistics for 172.16.253.50:
        Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 100, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
        Minimum = 16ms, Maximum = 93ms, Average = 21ms
    With this one specific application we're testing with - it stops loading at a predictable point, every time.  However, I can remain VNC'd to this machine the entire time, and do anything else on the machine, but the application will fail to load at the same point every time.  But like I said, if I bring that client back to our main network, it works just fine, so it's not the application itself causing the problem, and we have other, smaller issues with other applications we have.  It's really bizarre.
    It's really not acting like interference.  I just set up a new site with an identical configuration - but with a 3502i AP, and I can replicate the behavior at that location too.  Unfortunately at this time we don't have anything to study the traffic with - I actually have a call on a solution for that this afternoon.

  • Small office (5 users) - Accounting - wanting to secure ingress/egress of docs..

    Small office (5 users) - Accounting - wanting to secure ingress/egress of docs..I haven't seen this answered for an office of this size.I have the need for a relatively cheap software package or guidelines (I'll still keep the search active) for how to block, or at least alert, of sensitive data from leaving the company.I know that I'll have challenges on:1. Blocking certain attachment types from being sent, via webmail, web site attach, email. I am sure someone's written a how-to but I'm darned if I can find it. Suggestions?
    2. Blocking certain programs from running (whitelist/blacklist) - not really wanting to be deep in their pockets every time the application is updated, so not sure if a hash list would be a good idea based on a GPO security policy, or if black/white lists are best?3. Web blocking - I'm thinking I am wanting to...
    This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

    Hi guys,First, I've done a lot of searching on the weband read a few different threads on Spiceworks regarding HIPPA compliance and encrypting hard drives.Specifically these two threads:http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/596465-encryption-for-hipaa-compliancehttp://community.spiceworks.com/topic/320759-how-are-you-handling-hipaa-s-latest-data-at-rest-rulesSo I have a new client that's in the medical field. He has a server that's about two-three years old that looks as ifit was built with budget at the forefront. It's a whitebox with an Asus P8H77-v motherboard, 16 GB of ram, an i3 processor& two 1 TBSATA drives using raid 1 right off the motherboard. The roles it has: DNS/DHCP/File server/AD. Side note - eventhough it's been setup for AD none of the computers are on the domain.Their EMR software is Tracknet & the datais being stored...

  • Perfect router for small office (2-3 peoples)

    Hello,
    I'm trying to find the most cost effective VoIP solution for one of our small branch offices. This office will have no more than 3 peoples, but each person requires to have a PC and Cisco IP phone (voicemail, multiple line, direct inbound, pstn dial out and etc).
    Building will provide ethernet hand-off for internet access (part of T1 I guess) so we are planning to create VPN connection between our data center and the local gateway.
    As for the PSTN connection, 2 POTS will be provided by LEC. Gateway should be able to accomodate 4 Ports FXO module.
    What would be the smallest but the best router can handle firewall/VPN/IP Voice/PSTN for the small office?
    Thank you very much for your help in advance.

    Hi,
    What drives the price up a bit is the FXO requirement. Cisco used to have a router small as the 1751V, but it is EOL now, so the smaller you can get is a 2801. The price is almost the same but the earlier model was a bit more office-friendly due the box shape and size, while the 2801 is a classic rack box 1 unit.
    The good thing with the 2801 is that it supports POE (optionally), so if you put one 4 or 9 port ethernet switch (HWIC) in the router, your phones can work without the external power supply.
    You can configure the voice system be totally controlled by the router itself with the embedded CCME, or be part of company's CallManager (now CommunicationManager)
    Can I give you another advice, try to get ISDN BRI preferentially instead of FXO. You will have all the features like DID, caller-ID, and much easier setup a diagnostic in the router. Plus, if you add a WIC-1B/ST you can also have ISDN backup using the same data facilities.
    Please remember to rate useful posts!

  • Home Office Setup

    This is probably a very simple question, but I'll ask anyway!
    I have a couple of clients that want to set up a home office configuration providing a PC, wireless and VOIP handset configuration, providing the same functionality as though they were in the office.
    At the main office, I have an ISR 877 providing a basic ASDL connection and connected to that I have an ASA5505 providing the firewall, VPN access etc.
    I'm thinking that I can install a ISR 851 or similar at the home site, which will have it's WAN port connected to the existing Broadband router. I can then create a VPN connection (IPSec or Site-to-site?) to the main office through the ASA and hey presto, I have some happy users!!
    The things that I want to clarify are:
    1) Can the ISR 851 connected to an existing Broadband router through the FE, thus making a little secure business subnetwork within their home network.
    2) Am I going to need an IP at the home end? Or would I ensure the connection through the VPN through other means?
    3) Are there other, better ways to do this?
    Bear in mind that there isn't a huge budget to change the main office setup. I really want to buy an ISR, configure and install....
    Thanks in advance for any help...
    Campbell Thompson
    http://www.etonbridge.com

    You do not need a public IP if you use EZVPN:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080808395.shtml
    We used this once for a customer who had only one IP terminated on the router. We configured EZVPN on an ASA5505 but this should work with IOS routers as well.
    regards,
    Leo

  • Sharing Reports in Small Office

    Post Author: pma
    CA Forum: General
    Hello,
    I am hoping this is a basic question for someone.  We use Crystal Reports Professional II to report off a MS SQL server.  We would like to share report output amoung our small office of about 12 people.  I am told that the professional version comes with some type of web deployment system you can put on a server, but I don't see this anywhere.  I see the "Crystal Report Server" on Business Object's website, but this seems like overkill for us (not to mention too pricey).  Anyone have some simple direction on how to deploy reports?  Optimally I could schedule reports and have them viewed in a browser.
    Thanks in advance.

    Post Author: qcheng
    CA Forum: General
    Sounds like you have a Crystal Report Designer only. You may need to install BusinessObjectss or Crystal Report server on which you can publish your reports. Once you have published a report on the server, other people can get access the website and schedule the report.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Installation CS4 Master Collection (Trial) ab Netzwerk-Laufwerk? Nur auf portugiesisch?

    Für eine Evaluation bei einem Kunden sollte ich auf ein paar Arbeitsstationen (XP, SP3) die Master Collection CS4 installieren. Deshalb habe ich die ersten 3 DVDs auf ein Netzwerklaufwerk kopiert, weil ich annahm, dass die Installation damit schnelle

  • Help reinstalling OS X

    Hi I have an old 400mhz G3 iMac and i have previously had ubuntu linux on it. Thats srewed up now so i want to reinstall tiger. But since its on a dvd i restored it on my ipod, but now im stuck im sure how to boot it via the usb port, if someone coul

  • White glow in bottom right corner of 24" iMac

    Its only noticeable when I watch TV shows or movies that have black or dark colors. But I was wondering if this was a widespread problem and if I should take my iMac back to the store and get a replacement? Thanks!

  • [CS2] [JS]  Apply photoshop clipping path

    Hi, Does anyone know how to apply the photoshop clipping path to all images in a document, If the image contains one ? I can't find a clipping path property of the graphic object in the reference manual... The loop structure itself is not a problem..

  • Does Deleting on Revel's website delete the videos from the Elements Organizer on my PC?

    For some reason, I'm in a huge delay - Revel is apparently trying to upload over a 100 videos that I did not ask it to do.   If I delete them (they're grayed out due to the upload not being complete), is the Organizer copy still ok?