Simple Select Query (I think)

Hello,
How can I make a query to do this ?
I have a table t with a number(2) n column.
This table contains value from 0 to 99.
When I select I want to see the value selected on 2 digits like 01 and not 1.
Is it possible ?
Thankx

I am not sure whether I understand your question correctly.
Because since you have defined your column as number.Even if you insert 01, it will go as 1
CHeers
Ashwin N.
08:30:17 SQL> desc dbc_test
Name Null? Type
GIVEN_FIELD NUMBER
08:30:22 SQL> delete from dbc_test
08:30:28 2 /
3 rows deleted.
08:30:29 SQL> insert into dbc_test values (01);
1 row created.
08:30:40 SQL> insert into dbc_test values (09);
1 row created.
08:30:50 SQL> insert into dbc_test values (99);
1 row created.
08:31:06 SQL> select * from dbc_test;
GIVEN_FIELD
1
9
99
3 rows selected.
08:31:13 SQL> Select * from dbc_test where given_field >=10;
GIVEN_FIELD
99
1 row selected.
08:31:29 SQL>

Similar Messages

  • A simple select query taking forever

    Hi All
    I am not able to execute a simple select query, I traced my session and here is TKPROF of that Trace.
    Solaris 8 , Oracle 10.2.0.4.0
    TKPROF: Release 10.2.0.4.0 -
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle.  All rights reserved.
    Trace file: 502_ora_28260.trc
    Sort options: default
    count    = number of times OCI procedure was executed
    cpu      = cpu time in seconds executing
    elapsed  = elapsed time in seconds executing
    disk     = number of physical reads of buffers from disk
    query    = number of buffers gotten for consistent read
    current  = number of buffers gotten in current mode (usually for update)
    rows     = number of rows processed by the fetch or execute call
    select OBJECT_ID , ORACLE_USERNAME , SESSION_ID
    from
      v$locked_object
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        1      0.03      32.86          0          0          6           0
    total        3      0.03      32.86          0          0          6           0
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Optimizer mode: CHOOSE
    Parsing user id: SYS
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          0  MERGE JOIN  (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=60 us)
          0   SORT JOIN (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=58 us)
          0    MERGE JOIN  (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=42 us)
          1     SORT JOIN (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=2443 us)
       1105      FIXED TABLE FULL X$KSUSE (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=1204 us)
          0     SORT JOIN (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=41 us)
       1001      FIXED TABLE FULL X$KTCXB (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=16132 us)
          0   SORT JOIN (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
          0    FIXED TABLE FULL X$KTADM (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
      Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
      ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------
      SQL*Net message to client                       1        0.00          0.00
      buffer busy waits                              34        0.97         32.83
      SQL*Net break/reset to client                   1        0.00          0.00
    OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        1      0.03      32.86          0          0          6           0
    total        3      0.03      32.86          0          0          6           0
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
      Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
      ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------
      SQL*Net message to client                       2        0.00          0.00
      SQL*Net message from client                     1       19.00         19.00
      buffer busy waits                              34        0.97         32.83
      SQL*Net break/reset to client                   1        0.00          0.00
    OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    total        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
        1  user  SQL statements in session.
        0  internal SQL statements in session.
        1  SQL statements in session.
    Trace file: 502_ora_28260.trc
    Trace file compatibility: 10.01.00
    Sort options: default
           0  session in tracefile.
           1  user  SQL statements in trace file.
           0  internal SQL statements in trace file.
           1  SQL statements in trace file.
           1  unique SQL statements in trace file.
          64  lines in trace file.
          32  elapsed seconds in trace file. There is nothing fishy in alert logs... Please guide
    Thanks

    There it is TOP
    $ RUMPSHAKER>top
    load averages:  6.63,  7.45,  7.88;                    up 33+12:02:33           
    3631 processes: 3616 sleeping, 5 zombie, 1 stopped, 9 on cpu
    CPU states: 58.6% idle, 18.2% user, 23.2% kernel,  0.0% iowait,  0.0% swap
    Memory: 192G phys mem, 92G free mem, 96G swap, 96G free swap
       PID USERNAME LWP PRI NICE  SIZE   RES STATE    TIME    CPU COMMAND
    13752 ora0005    1  19    0 4243M 4219M sleep    5:21 62.78% oracle
    17758 ora0005    1  25    0 1174M 1156M cpu      1:05 37.12% oracle
    17923 root       1  57    0   18M   14M sleep  689:07 13.59% ecap_monitor
    20777 root      12  58    0   14M   13M sleep  864:33 11.55% OracleAgent
    18884 ora0004    1   1    0  830M  813M sleep    0:01  9.54% oracle
    12070 ora0004   61  58    0  320M  315M sleep   28.5H  8.29% emagent
    20347 root      16  59    0   33M   25M sleep   26.0H  6.34% caiUxsA2
    17949 ist0005    1  53    0 7984K 4984K cpu      0:00  3.93% top
         1 root       1  59    0 2912K 1288K sleep   32.2H  3.75% init
    15035 ora0001    1  46    0   32M   22M sleep  166:43  2.98% tnslsnr
      5748 ora0004   11  54    0  516M  496M sleep  389:37  2.78% oracle
    20567 ora0004    1  55    0   27M   22M sleep    0:00  2.69% sqlplus
      6730 ora0001    1  33    0  632M  616M sleep    0:06  2.67% oracle
    20557 ora0004    1  56    0   27M   23M sleep    0:00  2.53% sqlplus
      5355 ora0005    1  59    0 1154M 1137M sleep    0:04  2.46% oracleand VMSTAT 2 5
    $ RUMPSHAKER> vmstat 2 5
    kthr      memory            page            disk          faults      cpu
    r b w   swap  free  re  mf pi po fr de sr s0 s1 s2 sd   in   sy   cs us sy id
    6 8 0 143125576 74272080 4628 24012 488 150 149 0 0 4 4 -2 0 25037 192698 65249 38 26 36
    1 3 0 162803992 95246464 1989 6989 0 4 4 0 0 6 6 0  0 9170 57822 26434 8 13 79
    1 7 0 162801352 95240296 3043 15633 4 9737 9682 0 0 0 0 0 0 11277 73516 38200 16 16 68
    3 10 0 162801560 95227920 3326 12729 16 16862 16774 0 0 1 1 0 0 11377 86054 44758 16 17 68
    1 10 0 162784520 95186488 9638 48359 24 11682 11626 0 0 13 13 0 0 13484 149366 44205 23 29 47

  • Simple Select Query Taking 5-10s

    We have a web server on the same lan as the DB server.
    A simple select * from tablename (~100 entries) is taking
    anywhere from 30ms to 10 seconds lan. ASP code on the web server
    provides instant (30ms) queries. Ping is never <1ms. If I point
    to a remote DB server, the same query is never more than 300ms
    (which is great for over the internet).
    I enabled logging in CFAdmin -> Datasources and shortly
    after my select * from tablename I see this:
    spy(2009/02/28 16:39:00.539)>>
    Connection[2].setReadOnly(boolean readOnly)
    spy(2009/02/28 16:39:00.539)>> readOnly = false
    spy(2009/02/28 16:39:00.539)>> OK
    spy(2009/02/28 16:39:05.726)>> OK (true)
    We need to get this up and running ASAP. Please help!!

    > I'm connecting to SQL Server 2000 on a Win2k3 box.
    > The default CF8 Installation.
    > Every table this happens for.
    OK. I think CF8 runs the most recent JDBC drivers too. It
    might pay to
    check that though.
    > Select * is needed, because we have existing sites we
    are migrating a lot of
    > which use select *.
    Sure. But just for the purposes of experimentation, change
    your test code
    to specify columns to see if it makes any difference.
    It might pay to get hold of FusionReactor to check what CF is
    doing with
    the queries, under the hood.
    Adam

  • Simple select query is taking a lot of time

    hi gems...
    my table has 7267563 rows...and i am doing a simple select * from table;
    but it is taking a lot of time nearly 25minutes but not completed...
    when i did select count(1) from table then it gave the result instantly also select * from table where rownum < 10 is also fine...even when i am selecting all the records using rownum i.e. select * from table where rownum < 7267563 is also giving result instantly...
    but the entire table is not getting result i.e. select * from table...also there is no lock in the table(though i know that select is nothing to do with lock)..
    what may be the issue..please suggest...thanks in advance...
    Edited by: user12780416 on Dec 12, 2011 11:08 PM

    Hi;
    Please see below thread
    query takes too long ...
    help in solving long run query
    HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
    Hope it helps
    Regard
    Helios

  • Simple Select query with 'where', 'and', 'between' clauses takes time

    Hi,
    I have a select query as below
    SELECT * FROM (SELECT a.*,ROWNUM currentStartRecord From (select ai_inbound.ai_inb_seq tableseq,'AI_INBOUND' tablename,'INBOUND' direction,ai_inbound.appl,ai_inbound.ai_date datetime,ai_inbound.ic_receiver_id pg_id,ai_inbound.ic_sender_id tp_id,ai_inbound.session_no,ai_inbound.ic_ctl_no,ai_inbound.msg_set_id msg_type,ai_inbound.appl_msg_ctl_no reference_no,ai_inbound.fg_version version,ai_inbound.msg_status status,ai_inbound.input_file_name,ai_inbound.output_file_name,ai_inbound.ack_file_name from ai_inbound where ai_inbound.appl = ? and ai_inbound.ai_date between ? and ? )a where ROWNUM <= 49)where currentStartRecord >= 0
    The above query takes longer time through application than expected when the date fields are passed whereas it works fine when no date fields are passed. We are using oracle9.2 version of the database. All the indexed columns and partitioned indexed columns are rebuild.
    Kindly let me know how can i tune up the query to improve the performance.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I have a select query as below
    SELECT * FROM (SELECT a.*,ROWNUM currentStartRecord From (select ai_inbound.ai_inb_seq tableseq,'AI_INBOUND' tablename,'INBOUND' direction,ai_inbound.appl,ai_inbound.ai_date datetime,ai_inbound.ic_receiver_id pg_id,ai_inbound.ic_sender_id tp_id,ai_inbound.session_no,ai_inbound.ic_ctl_no,ai_inbound.msg_set_id msg_type,ai_inbound.appl_msg_ctl_no reference_no,ai_inbound.fg_version version,ai_inbound.msg_status status,ai_inbound.input_file_name,ai_inbound.output_file_name,ai_inbound.ack_file_name from ai_inbound where ai_inbound.appl = ? and ai_inbound.ai_date between ? and ? )a where ROWNUM <= 49)where currentStartRecord >= 0
    The above query takes longer time through application than expected when the date fields are passed whereas it works fine when no date fields are passed. We are using oracle9.2 version of the database. All the indexed columns and partitioned indexed columns are rebuild.
    Kindly let me know how can i tune up the query to improve the performance.
    Thanks

  • Problem with SImple Select Query

    Hi
    I am trying to write a simple Select SQL to a table and find out whether certain data exist or not. I have done this before but now for some reason this one is not working.
    I started like this
    select single * from ANLH where ANLN1 = rec-Asset
                                                 and BUKRS = Comp_Cd.
    * Error Handler for non-existent empno in the database
      if sy-subrc = 0 or rec-asset = ''.
         rec_failed = 'T'.
         concatenate 'Asset does not exist' rec-asset into asst_err.
      endif.
    when i debugged the code i found out that sy-subrc  is returning 4 all the time. (i have passes some numbers in rec-Asset which i know doesn't exist in that table.
    So i have modified the code to see if its pulling anything.
    like this
    select single ANLN1 into v_Asset from ANLH where ANLN1 = rec-Asset
                                                 and BUKRS = Comp_Cd.
    * Error Handler for non-existent empno in the database
      if sy-subrc = 0 or rec-asset = ''.
         rec_failed = 'T'.
         concatenate 'Asset does not exist' rec-asset into asst_err.
      endif.
    in debug v_asset is always empty (for real number and for the madeup number)
    Please help.
    Thanks
    Edited by: Anwarul Kabir on Apr 3, 2008 9:27 PM
    Edited by: Anwarul Kabir on Apr 3, 2008 9:29 PM
    Edited by: Anwarul Kabir on Apr 3, 2008 9:30 PM

    Thanks for the answer. But i thought i was doing the same. Anyway I replaced my code with yours but result is the same. I also did this
    select single
    ANLN1 into v_Asset
    from ANLH where
    ANLN1 = '20000544'
    and BUKRS = '3000'.
    I did SE11 and entered the table name and i can see that data.
    but on my code i get sy-subrc=4 and v_Asset is blank
    again i tried with this madeup number which i know its not in the table
    select single
    ANLN1 into v_Asset
    from ANLH where
    ANLN1 = '2056555433544'
    and BUKRS = '3000'.
    Get sy-subrc=4 and v_Asset is blank...
    Is there anything special about the Table?

  • Simple SELECT query to generate  INSERT for a table

    Hi,
    I am looking for a SELECT query which generates INSERT statements for a table.Please guide.
    Thanks
    PG.

    Like this?
    SQL> SELECT * from kons;
         COL1      COL2
            1         1
            2         2
    SQL> SELECT 'INSERT INTO kons VALUES('||col1||','||col2||');' statement FROM kons;
    STATEMENT
    INSERT INTO kons VALUES(1,1);
    INSERT INTO kons VALUES(2,2);
    SQL> If you have character and / or date columns you will have to change my example,
    but you might get the idea from it.
    You can spool the result to a file.
    Regards,
    Guido
    Edit: ';' added to end of statement...

  • How to reduce functions with simple select query?

    I have a function to identify the root parent of a particular id. I use this in function in select query,which invokes function for every row in table.I need to merge the function inside the query itself.Please suggest  me.
    Function
    CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION fnroot(v_id int ) return int as
    v_left int;
    v_right int;
    v-result int;
    begin
    select left,right into v_left,v_right from sam where id=v_id;
    select id into v_result from sam
    where id in (select id from mst m where m.depth=2 )
    and left < v_left and right > v_right;
    return v_result;
    end
    query:
    select fnroot(s.id) from master s;

    Hi,
    Ramin's idea is very good. You must use joins in function as below
    CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION fnroot(v_id int ) return int as
        v_result int;
    Begin
    select  s.id into v_result
      from sam s on s.id = v_id
               left join sam s2 on (s2.id in (select id from mst m where m.depth = 2) and s2.left < s.left and s2.right > s.right)
    return v_result;
    End;
    Regards
    Mahir M. Quluzade

  • Decimal places in a simple select query

    Hi , I've a very basic query for you. I'm running the Select statement below, and want the Area to be just two decimal places. Is there a simple way of doing this ?
    I'm having to compare the difference in accuracy between area calculations in Oracle Spatial and MapInfo to some very sceptical users, and they want to know if we're going to be getting 'vastly' different results.
    (The tolerance is set to 0.5 mm in this instance, as we're using Ordnance Survey MasterMap to derivve our spatial objects).
    select sssi_name, sdo_geom.sdo_area (geoloc, 0.0005)
    from SSSI
    Many Thanks,
    Bruce

    Do you mean simply the following?
    select
        sssi_name,
        round(sdo_geom.sdo_area(geoloc, 0.0005), 2)
    from SSSI

  • "System Resource Exceeded" for simple select query in Access 2013

    Using Access 2013 32-bit on a Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise. This computer has
    8 GB of RAM.
    I am getting:
    "System Resource Exceeded"  errors in two different databases
    for simple queries like:
    SELECT FROM .... GROUP BY ...
    UPDATE... SET ... WHERE ...
    I compacted the databases several times, no result. One database size is approx 1 GB, the other one is approx. 600 MB.
    I didn't have any problems in Office 2010
    so I had to revert to this version.
    Please advise.
    Regards,
    M.R.

    Hi Greg. I too am running Access on an RDP server. Checking Task Manager, I can see many copies of MSACCESS running in the process list, from all users on the server. We typically have 40-60 users on that server. I am only changing the Processor Affinity
    for MY copy, and only when I run into this problem. Restarting Access daily, I always get back to multi-processor mode soon thereafter.
    As this problem only seems to happen on very large Access table updates, and as there are only three of us performing those kind of updates, we have good control on who might want to change the affinity setting to solve this problem. However, I
    understand that in other environments this might not be a good solution. In my case, we have 16 processors on the server, so I always take #1, my co-worker here in the US always takes #2, etc. This works for us, and I am only describing it here in case it
    works for someone else.
    The big question in my mind is what multi-threading methods are employed by Microsoft for Access that would cause this problem for very large datasets. Processing time for an update query on, say, 2 million records is massively improved by going down
    to 1 processor. The problem is easily reproduced, and so far I have not seen it in Excel even when working with very large worksheets. Also have not seen it in MS SQL. It is just happening in Access.

  • Simple select query

    Hi,
    I'm using database version 10.2.0.4.0
    I have a simple table here that goes like this:
    customerPreference (customerid, fruitid)
    I want to find out which customerid had bought all the different fruits.
    I did a distinct count of fruitid, but how do I choose which customerid has that distinct count value?
    select count(distinct fruitid) AS total_number_of fruits
    from customerPreference;
    Regards,
    Keith

    >
    customerPreference (customerid, fruitid)
    I want to find out which customerid had bought all the different fruits.
    I did a distinct count of fruitid, but how do I choose which customerid has that distinct count value?
    select count(distinct fruitid) AS total_number_of fruits
    from customerPreference;
    >
    Well you got the first part done; the number of distinct fruits.
    So the next part is to get a list of customers and the number of distinct fruits each of them has purchased and then filter it using your query above. This is untested since you didn't provide table ddl or data.
    SELECT CUSTOMERID, COUNT(DISTINCT FRUITID) AS CUST_DISTINCT_FRUITS
    FROM CUSTOMERPREFERENCE
    GROUP BY CUSTOMERID
    HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT FRUITID) = (
    select count(distinct fruitid) AS total_number_of fruits
    from customerPreference);

  • Improving a simple select query, which uses all rows.

    Hi All,
    Please excuse me if the question is too silly. Below is my code
    SQL> select * from v$version;
    BANNER
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Prod
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    CORE    10.2.0.1.0      Production
    TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.07
    SQL> show parameter optim
    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    object_cache_optimal_size            integer     102400
    optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
    optimizer_features_enable            string      10.2.0.1
    optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
    optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
    optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
    optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
    plsql_optimize_level                 integer     2
    SQL> explain plan for select SUM(decode(transaction_type,'D',txn_amount,0)) payments_reversals,
      2          SUM(decode(transaction_type,'C',txn_amount,0)) payments,primary_card_no,statement_date
      3             from credit_card_pymt_dtls  group by primary_card_no,statement_date;
    Explained.
    SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 2801218574
    | Id  | Operation          | Name                  | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |                       |  1912K|    56M|       | 21466   (3)| 00:04:18 |
    |   1 |  SORT GROUP BY     |                       |  1912K|    56M|   161M| 21466   (3)| 00:04:18 |
    |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| CREDIT_CARD_PYMT_DTLS |  1912K|    56M|       |  4863   (3)| 00:00:59 |
    9 rows selected.
    SQL> select index_name,index_type
      2  from all_indexes
      3  where table_name = 'CREDIT_CARD_PYMT_DTLS';
    INDEX_NAME                     INDEX_TYPE
    INDX_TRANTYPE                  BITMAP
    INDX_PCARD                     NORMAL
    INDX_PSTATEMENT_DATE           NORMALThe query is using all the records in the CREDIT_CARD_PYMT_DTLS table. Transaction type will be either 'C' or 'D'.
    CREDIT_CARD_PYMT_DTLS has 2 million rows and the qury will output 1.5 million rows. Table statisticas are upto date.
    The query now is taking almost 5 minutes. Is thaere any way to reduce the time ?
    Our DB server has 8 CPUs and 8 GB memory. Is the timing genuine ?
    Thanks in Advance.
    Edited by: user11115924 on Apr 29, 2009 2:43 AM
    All the columns used in the query are already indexed. ( Ofcourse, not only for this query.)

    Hi All,
    Thanks for the helps provided. Expecting it once more..
    My actual query is as below
    select     primary_card_no,base_segment_number,atab.previous_balance,current_balance,intrest_amt_due_this_cycle,total_min_amt_due,total_credit_limit,
              total_purchase_this_cycle,total_cash_trns_this_cycle,available_credit_limit,payments,utilization,payment_ratio,payments_reversals,cash_limit,
              available_cash_limit, description
    from
           select primary_card_no,DECODE(base_segment_number,NULL,primary_card_no,base_segment_number) base_segment_number,
                   SUM(previous_balance) previous_balance,SUM(current_balance) current_balance ,SUM(intrest_amt_due_this_cycle) intrest_amt_due_this_cycle,
                   SUM(total_min_amt_due) total_min_amt_due,SUM(total_credit_limit_all) total_credit_limit,
                   SUM(total_purchase_this_cycle) total_purchase_this_cycle,SUM(total_cash_trns_this_cycle) total_cash_trns_this_cycle,
                   SUM(available_credit_limit) available_credit_limit,SUM(payments) payments,
                   (SUM(NVL(current_balance,0)) / SUM(total_credit_limit_all)) * 100 utilization,
                   (SUM(NVL(payments,0)) / DECODE(SUM(previous_balance),0,NULL,SUM(previous_balance))) * 100 payment_ratio,
                   SUM(payments_reversals) payments_reversals,SUM(cash_limit) cash_limit,SUM(available_cash_limit) available_cash_limit
          from
            ( select a.*,NVL(payments_reversals,0)payments_reversals ,NVL(payments,0) payments
              from
                    (  select primary_card_no,previous_balance,current_balance,intrest_amt_due_this_cycle,total_min_amt_due,total_purchase_this_cycle,
                              total_cash_trns_this_cycle,statement_date,available_credit_limit,cash_limit,available_cash_limit,
                           (case when statement_date <= TO_DATE('301108','ddmmyy') then NULLIF(total_credit_limit,0)
                                      else NULLIF((select credit_limit
                                                from ccm_dbf_chtxn_v0 t1
                                                   where t1.batch_id = '011208'
                                                   and SUBSTR(t1.card_number,4) = a.primary_card_no),0)
                             end) total_credit_limit_all
                     from
                        ( select primary_card_no,previous_balance,current_balance,INTREST_AMT_DUE_THIS_CYCLE,
                                    TOTAL_MIN_AMT_DUE,TOTAL_PURCHASE_THIS_CYCLE,TOTAL_CASH_TRNS_THIS_CYCLE,statement_date,
                                   AVAILABLE_CREDIT_LIMIT,cash_limit,available_cash_limit,total_credit_limit
                          from credit_card_master_all@FGBAPPL_LINK
                        ) a
                     where statement_date between ADD_MONTHS(TRUNC(SYSDATE,'mm'),-6) and  TRUNC(SYSDATE,'mm')-1
                 ) a,
                 ( select SUM(decode(transaction_type,'D',txn_amount,0)) payments_reversals,
                               SUM(decode(transaction_type,'C',txn_amount,0)) payments,primary_card_no,TO_CHAR(statement_date,'MON-RRRR') sdate
                    from credit_card_pymt_dtls 
                    group by primary_card_no,TO_CHAR(statement_date,'MON-RRRR')
                 ) b
             where TO_CHAR(a.statement_date,'MON-RRRR')= b.sdate(+)
               and a.primary_card_no= b.primary_card_no(+)
            ) a,
            (  select SUBSTR(a.card_number,4) card_number,base_segment_number,TO_DATE(account_creation_date,'DDMMYYYY') account_creation_date,
                           a.batch_id, credit_limit credit_limit_current
                from
                       (  select *
                           from ccm_dbf_phtxn_v0
                           where batch_id=  (SELECT to_char(MAX(TO_DATE(SUBSTR(BATCH_ID,1,6),'DDMMRR')),'DDMMRR') FROM CCM_MST_V0)
                        ) a,
                        ( select *
                          from ccm_dbf_chtxn_v0
                          where batch_id=(SELECT to_char(MAX(TO_DATE(SUBSTR(BATCH_ID,1,6),'DDMMRR')),'DDMMRR') FROM CCM_MST_V0)
                        ) b
                where a.card_number=b.card_number
                and TO_NUMBER(ROUND(MONTHS_BETWEEN(SYSDATE,TO_DATE(account_creation_date,'DDMMYYYY')),2)) >=6
                and a.company ='BNK'
            ) b
       where a.primary_card_no = b.card_number
       group by primary_card_no,base_segment_number) atab, card_summary_param btab
    where utilization between utilization_low and utilization_high
    and payment_ratio between  payment_ratio_low and payment_ratio_high
    and SIGN(atab.previous_balance) =btab.previous_balanceWhere I have to put the PARALLEL hint for maximum performance?
    Sorry for asking blindly without doing any R&D. Time is not permitting that...
    Edited by: user11115924 on Apr 29, 2009 5:09 AM
    Sorry for the kiddy aliases.. Query is not written by me..

  • Simple Select query but not arriving at results!

    Hello All,
    I have a table with primary key (antrag_nr, beladeflag, stempel)
    Desc test88
    Name Null? Type
    ANTRAG_NR NOT NULL NUMBER
    A_PROZESS NUMBER
    STEMPEL NOT NULL DATE
    BELADEFLAG NOT NULL VARCHAR2(1)
    desc test99
    Name Null? Type
    ANTRAG_NR NOT NULL NUMBER
    A_PROZESS NUMBER
    STEMPEL NOT NULL DATE
    BELADEFLAG NOT NULL VARCHAR2(1)
    select * from test99;
    ANTRAG_NR A_PROZESS STEMPEL B
    2 4 05-JAN-05 m
    1 6 07-JAN-05 m
    1 7 08-JAN-05 m
    1 8 09-JAN-05 m
    2 5 06-JAN-05 m
    select * from test88;
    ANTRAG_NR A_PROZESS STEMPEL B
    1 1 01-JAN-05 m
    1 2 02-JAN-05 m
    1 2 03-JAN-05 m
    1 3 04-JAN-05 m
    2 1 01-JAN-05 m
    2 2 02-JAN-05 m
    2 3 04-JAN-05 m
    1 4 05-JAN-05 m
    1 5 06-JAN-05 m
    1 6 07-JAN-05 m
    2 4 05-JAN-05 m
    ANTRAG_NR A_PROZESS STEMPEL B
    1     7 08-JAN-05 m
    My query:
    insert into test88
    (select a.antrag_nr, a.a_prozess, a.stempel, a.beladeflag from test88 a, test99 b
    where
    a.antrag_nr = b.antrag_nr
    and
    a.a_prozess not in (select a_prozess from test99 where antrag_nr = a.antrag_nr)
    and
    a.stempel = ( select max(stempel) from test88));
    what the query does is:
    selects the highest value for the entire stempel column in table test88 and checks the condition a.antrag_nr = b.antrag_nr &a.a_prozess not in (select a_prozess from test99 where antrag_nr = a.antrag_nr)
    but what I would like to have is
    that it should check the max(stempel) for each antrag_nr in test88 & then insert.
    For example when antrag_nr = 1 and then the max (stempel) in table test 88 => 08-jan-2005
    Then it should check with the antrag_nr =2
    and then max(stempel) in the table test88 => 05-JAN-05 and then insert the table test88 from the source table test99 & so on
    according to my query it checks the highest values of stempel column 08-jan-2005 where antrag_nr=1
    but it doesn’t check for antrag_nr = 2 at all.
    How can I arrive at such a result, Can anyone throw some insight..
    Thanks in advance,
    Karthik krishna.
    -- Thanks to splazm for answering my previous post!

    Hello All,
    I have a table with primary key (antrag_nr, beladeflag, stempel)
    Desc test88
    Name Null? Type
    ANTRAG_NR NOT NULL NUMBER
    A_PROZESS NUMBER
    STEMPEL NOT NULL DATE
    BELADEFLAG NOT NULL VARCHAR2(1)
    desc test99
    Name Null? Type
    ANTRAG_NR NOT NULL NUMBER
    A_PROZESS NUMBER
    STEMPEL NOT NULL DATE
    BELADEFLAG NOT NULL VARCHAR2(1)
    select * from test99;
    ANTRAG_NR A_PROZESS STEMPEL B
    2 4 05-JAN-05 m
    1 6 07-JAN-05 m
    1 7 08-JAN-05 m
    1 8 09-JAN-05 m
    2 5 06-JAN-05 m
    select * from test88;
    ANTRAG_NR A_PROZESS STEMPEL B
    1 1 01-JAN-05 m
    1 2 02-JAN-05 m
    1 2 03-JAN-05 m
    1 3 04-JAN-05 m
    2 1 01-JAN-05 m
    2 2 02-JAN-05 m
    2 3 04-JAN-05 m
    1 4 05-JAN-05 m
    1 5 06-JAN-05 m
    1 6 07-JAN-05 m
    2 4 05-JAN-05 m
    ANTRAG_NR A_PROZESS STEMPEL B
    1     7 08-JAN-05 m
    My query:
    insert into test88
    (select a.antrag_nr, a.a_prozess, a.stempel, a.beladeflag from test88 a, test99 b
    where
    a.antrag_nr = b.antrag_nr
    and
    a.a_prozess not in (select a_prozess from test99 where antrag_nr = a.antrag_nr)
    and
    a.stempel = ( select max(stempel) from test88));
    what the query does is:
    selects the highest value for the entire stempel column in table test88 and checks the condition a.antrag_nr = b.antrag_nr &a.a_prozess not in (select a_prozess from test99 where antrag_nr = a.antrag_nr)
    but what I would like to have is
    that it should check the max(stempel) for each antrag_nr in test88 & then insert.
    For example when antrag_nr = 1 and then the max (stempel) in table test 88 => 08-jan-2005
    Then it should check with the antrag_nr =2
    and then max(stempel) in the table test88 => 05-JAN-05 and then insert the table test88 from the source table test99 & so on
    according to my query it checks the highest values of stempel column 08-jan-2005 where antrag_nr=1
    but it doesn’t check for antrag_nr = 2 at all.
    How can I arrive at such a result, Can anyone throw some insight..
    Thanks in advance,
    Karthik krishna.
    -- Thanks to splazm for answering my previous post!

  • Simple select query - Row ordering issue

    Hi Guys,
    I want to ask that row chaining and row migration is applicable for Global Temporary Table as well?
    Or is it something related only to Physical DB tables?
    I have requirement as -
    DB Table --> populate GTT_First(process on this) --> Populate GTT_Second.
    I want to insert rows in GTT_Second in particular order.
    So which approach will assure this, or which is better approach?
    To have order by while selecting data from DB Table and inserting in GTT_First OR
    To have order by while inserting data from GTT_First into GTT_Second?
    Will row chaining or row migration play any role here, given that all tables have 85 columns.
    Thanks in advance!

    Avi4Ora wrote:
    We face some problem, here we are not using rownum as you have used for demo. We use input date, a date field.some problem? what problem?
    rownum is only used to fill the tables up with some data....
    And each row in our case has 80 columns.so?
    As i couldnt see the reason for this to happen, I could relate this behaviour to some extent with Row chaining and row migration.What problem are you facing, and why do you think it has to do with row chaining or row migration (doesn't make sense to me)
    Here an example with dates
    SQL> create global temporary table gtt_one
      2  (str varchar2(10)
      3  ,dt date
      4  )
      5  /
    Table created.
    SQL>
    SQL> create global temporary table gtt_two
      2  (id number
      3  ,str varchar2(10))
      4  /
    Table created.
    SQL>
    SQL> create sequence seq
      2  /
    Sequence created.
    SQL> insert into gtt_one
      2  select 'a'||rownum
      3       , sysdate + rownum
      4    from all_objects
      5   where rownum <= 10
      6  /
    10 rows created.
    SQL>
    SQL>
    SQL>
    SQL> insert into gtt_two
      2  select seq.nextval
      3       , str
      4    from (select str
      5            from gtt_one
      6           order by dt desc
      7         )
      8  /
    10 rows created.
    SQL>
    SQL> select *
      2    from gtt_two
      3  /
            ID STR
             1 a10
             2 a9
             3 a8
             4 a7
             5 a6
             6 a5
             7 a4
             8 a3
             9 a2
            10 a1
    10 rows selected.

  • Simple select query output-

    Hi Guys,
         I have the following select statement…
    SELECT *
    FROM (SELECT '111', '222', '333' FROM dual)
    Output
         ‘111’     ‘222’     ‘333’
    1     111     222     333
    But the output I was looking for was,
         my_col
    1 111
    2 222
    3 333
    Can someone let me know how to achieve this?
    Many Thanks…
    Napster

    SELECT rownum,
      column_value
       FROM
      (SELECT '111' col1, '222' col2, '333' col3 FROM dual
      ) t,
      TABLE(sys.odcivarchar2list(t.col1,t.col2,t.col3))Ravi Kumar

Maybe you are looking for

  • Unable to create volume - error message when exporting

    Hello - relatively new Mac and iphoto user here. I'm trying to export photos from iphoto to a 2 GB thumb drive. I keep getting the error message "unable to create volume" when I try to move anything but very small batches of photos over. What's going

  • Acrobat 9 security & copies

    I have put password protection on a parent file (in my computer). I have made copies of the file to CD. The problem is that the file is protected as it should be in my computer but the CD copies will not accept password protection. I put in the passw

  • How do i talk to a sales rep about skype for busin...

    Can I phone someone?

  • Log Archive Failed via dbacockpit

    Hi, I've scheduled Oracle db log archive via dbacockpit. It failed at 1am, but it completed successfully later at 1pm as scheduled. So far, had 2 such occurences. Any where to diagnose the intermittent error ? Please enlighten. TIA ! 05.05.2009     0

  • What was the purpose in removing the visibilty of cropmarks?

    1). What was the purpose in removing the visibilty of cropmarks? 2). Why, when I go to create a jpeg using 'Save for web & devices', are my cropmarks ignored? 3). How is this new pop-up slider bar for gradients, better? It is absolutely unwieldy, and