Slow response  on data dictionary queries with optimizer_mode=rule in  10g

I have two dataabse: DB1 (9i) and DB2 (10g) on windows 2000
They are two development databases with the same schemas and same tables. The application executes the same commands but with different results and execution plans.
In DB2 the queries with the most slow response tima are the queries on the data dictionary (for example: all_synonyms).
These query are very fast with the optimizer_mode=cost and very slow with the optimizer_mode=rule.
And the the problem is this:
in DB1 and DB2 the application executes after the connection this command:
ALTER SESSION SET OPTIMIZER_MODE = 'RULE';
These are the traces of the session in db1 and db2:
The queries are created dynamically by the application.
Is there a solution for this?
thanks
Message was edited by:
user596611

Here is a simple example of what can happen,
@>alter session set optimizer_mode=all_rows;
@>SELECT PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY());
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| Id  | Operation        | Name | Rows  | Cost (%CPU)|
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |      |     1 |     2   (0)|
|   1 |  FAST DUAL       |      |     1 |     2   (0)|
@>alter session set optimizer_mode=rule;
@>SELECT PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY());
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| Id  | Operation        | Name |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |      |
|   1 |  FAST DUAL       |      |
Note
      - rule based optimizer used (consider using cbo)As you can see incomplete explain plans. Therefore it is not advised.
Adith

Similar Messages

  • Adding a new Data dictionary component withing the dev config perspective

    I am working through the example application found in the book "Java Programming with the SAP Web Application Server"  I am at the step where I need to create a data dictionary component under my SC.  When I create the component i get the following error;
    Mar 13, 2006 2:25:21 PM /userOut/Development Component (com.sap.ide.eclipse.component.provider.actions.dc.UsedDCFoundHandlerBase) [Thread[main,5,main]] ERROR: failed to resolve reference "sap.com/tc/ddic/metamodel/content" for DC "mycomp.com_LB_EMPLOY_1:mycomp.com/appl/employee/dic":Cannot find compartment of used component: sap.com:tc/ddic/metamodel/content
    Any ideas? 
    Jarrod

    Did you import the 3 required SC:
    SAP-JEE,
    SAP_BUILD
    SAP_JTECHS
    the DC: sap.com/tc/ddic/metamodel/content is part of SC SAP_JTECHS
    You can brouse all imported DCs from CBS
    SAPs should be 161. The one you are looking for is N:31 in the SAP_JTECHS
    If you have problem with the local bild, than you havn't checked out all DC to your NWDS.
    Regards, Angel

  • Oracle 11g with OPTIMIZER_MODE=RULE go faster!!

    I recently migrated Oracle 9.2.0.8 to Oracle 11g but the querys doesn't work as I hope.
    The same query takes 3:20 min aprox using optimizer_mode=ALL_ROWS and 0:20 using optimizer_mode=RULE or using RULE hint.
    The query in CBO makes a cartesian product between the indexes of the table.
    This is one query and the "autrotrace on" log on Oracle 11g:
    SELECT /*+ NO_INDEX (PK0004111303310) */MIN(BASE.ID_SCHED_TASK)+1 I
    FROM M4RJS_SCHED_TASKS BASE
    WHERE NOT EXISTS
    (SELECT BASE2.ID_SCHED_TASK
    FROM M4RJS_SCHED_TASKS BASE2
    WHERE BASE2.ID_SCHED_TASK>BASE.ID_SCHED_TASK
    AND BASE2.ID_SCHED_TASK<BASE.ID_SCHED_TASK+2)
    ORDER BY 1 ASC
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 3937517195
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 14 | | 328 (2)| 00:00:04 |
    | 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 14 | | | |
    | 2 | MERGE JOIN ANTI | | 495 | 6930 | | 328 (2)| 00:00:04 |
    | 3 | INDEX FULL SCAN | PK0004111303310 | 49487 | 338K| | 119 (1)| 00:00:02 |
    |* 4 | FILTER | | | | | | |
    |* 5 | SORT JOIN | | 49487 | 338K| 1576K| 209 (2)| 00:00:03 |
    | 6 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| PK0004111303310 | 49487 | 338K| | 33 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    4 - filter("BASE2"."ID_SCHED_TASK"<"BASE"."ID_SCHED_TASK"+2)
    5 - access("BASE2"."ID_SCHED_TASK">"BASE"."ID_SCHED_TASK")
    filter("BASE2"."ID_SCHED_TASK">"BASE"."ID_SCHED_TASK")
    Statistics
    1 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    242 consistent gets
    8 physical reads
    0 redo size
    519 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    524 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    1 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    1 rows processed
    Thanks to all !

    Sorry Mschnatt, I posted the wrong query, i was testing with HINTS, the correct query is your posted query.
    1* I analyzed the tables and the result is the same:
    This is the query and "autorace on" log using OPTIMIZER_MODE=RULE on Oracle 11g:
    SQL> R
    1 SELECT MIN(BASE.ID_SCHED_TASK)+1 I
    2 FROM M4RJS_SCHED_TASKS BASE
    3 WHERE NOT EXISTS
    4 (SELECT BASE2.ID_SCHED_TASK
    5 FROM M4RJS_SCHED_TASKS BASE2
    6 WHERE BASE2.ID_SCHED_TASK>BASE.ID_SCHED_TASK
    7 AND BASE2.ID_SCHED_TASK<BASE.ID_SCHED_TASK+2)
    8* ORDER BY 1 ASC
    I
    2
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.33
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 795265574
    | Id | Operation | Name |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | |
    | 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | |
    |* 2 | FILTER | |
    | 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | M4RJS_SCHED_TASKS |
    |* 4 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | PK0004111303310 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    2 - filter( NOT EXISTS (SELECT 0 FROM "M4RJS_SCHED_TASKS" "BASE2"
    WHERE "BASE2"."ID_SCHED_TASK"<:B1+2 AND "BASE2"."ID_SCHED_TASK">:B2))
    4 - access("BASE2"."ID_SCHED_TASK">:B1 AND
    "BASE2"."ID_SCHED_TASK"<:B2+2)
    Note
    - rule based optimizer used (consider using cbo)
    Statistics
    0 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    101509 consistent gets
    0 physical reads
    0 redo size
    519 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    524 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    0 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    1 rows processed
    This is the query and "autorace on" log using OPTIMIZER_MODE=ALL_ROWA on Oracle 11g:
    Elapsed: 00:03:14.78
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 3937517195
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 12 | | 317 (2)| 00:00:04 |
    | 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 12 | | | |
    | 2 | MERGE JOIN ANTI | | 495 | 5940 | | 317 (2)| 00:00:04 |
    | 3 | INDEX FULL SCAN | PK0004111303310 | 49487 | 289K| | 119 (1)| 00:00:02 |
    |* 4 | FILTER | | | | | | |
    |* 5 | SORT JOIN | | 49487 | 289K| 1176K| 198 (3)| 00:00:03 |
    | 6 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| PK0004111303310 | 49487 | 289K| | 33 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    4 - filter("BASE2"."ID_SCHED_TASK"<"BASE"."ID_SCHED_TASK"+2)
    5 - access("BASE2"."ID_SCHED_TASK">"BASE"."ID_SCHED_TASK")
    filter("BASE2"."ID_SCHED_TASK">"BASE"."ID_SCHED_TASK")
    Statistics
    0 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    242 consistent gets
    0 physical reads
    0 redo size
    519 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    524 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    1 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    1 rows processed
    3* This is an example query, the problem persist in other bigger queries.
    Thanks for you help

  • Performance problems with Oracle 9.2.0.2 Database with optimizer_mode=RULE

    If I make an explain plan for a query of the following form:
    SELECT a.*
    FROM a, b
    WHERE a.pk = b.fk
    AND b.pk IN (1, 2);
    the explain plan states, that a FULL-TABLE-SCAN on table b is performed and a HASH-JOIN is done to execute the query.
    On 8.0.6 Database the Indexes on the tables are used and a NESTED-LOOP join is performed.
    Why is the 9.2.0.2 Database using HASH-JOINS when the Database is explicitly set to optimizer_mode=RULE, as I think HASH-JOINS are only possible with CBO?
    How can I force the 9.2.0.2 database to perform exactly like the 8.0.6 database with RBO?

    some options:
    set the hash_join_enabled parameter to false in the init.ora file.
    set the compatible parameter to 8.0 in the init.ora file.
    documentation:
    HASH_JOIN_ENABLED specifies whether the optimizer should consider using a
    hash join as a join method. When set to FALSE, hash join is turned off; that is, it is
    not available as a join method that the optimizer can consider choosing. When set to
    TRUE, the optimizer will compare the cost of a hash join to other types of joins, and
    choose it if it gives the best cost.
    COMPATIBLE allows you to use a new release, while at the same time guaranteeing
    backward compatibility with an earlier release. This is in case it becomes necessary
    to revert to the earlier release. This parameter specifies the release with which the
    Oracle server must maintain compatibility. Some features of the current release may
    be restricted.

  • Extremely slow performance transferring data over USB with Time Capsule

    I have the 2TB wireless Time Capsule. I have it setup as an extension to my current WiFi at home, since I already had a WLAN router. I have an external harddrive (500gig) that I connected to my Time Capsule because I wanted to transfer data from the Time Capsule to the external HD. The external HD is formatted with FAT32 file system, so read/write is no problem.
    When, using my MacBook Pro, I navigated to the Time Capsule and dragged files over to the connected USB harddrive (connected directly in the Time Capsule), the performance to transfer is extremely SLOW! It was slower than doing the transfer completely wirelessly (USB drive connected to laptop and transfer wirelessly from TC)!
    I do not understand this at all! It should be a simple transfer using the USB connection! When I do a transfer from my laptop directly to the USB harddrive, with it connected directly to the laptop, the transfers are super fast!
    What happened? Can someone please explain this or tell me what I need to do?
    Thank you!

    I am still confused here.
    My original question was regarding the use of my USB external harddrive. It was connected to the back of the TC. The TC was wirelessly speaking to my WLAN router. Using my laptop (also wirelessly speaking to WLAN router), I navigated to the TC and saw 2 listings - one for the data on the harddrive in the TC and one for the new external USB drive connected to the back of the TC. I wanted to transfer data from the harddrive in the TC to the USB external drive. Based on what I expected, I thought the transfer rate would merely be limited by the USB 2.0 interface that is being used by the external drive. However, I was definitely wrong! The transfer rate (shown by the estimate in time to transfer the data by my MacBook Pro) was doubled to 14 hrs.
    Originally, it was only 7 hrs when the USB external drive is connected directly to my laptop and I connect to the TC wirelessly. Weird!
    So why doesn't the TC simply transfer the data from its internal harddrive to the external USB drive directly without using any wireless technology?
    The second question I have is regarding the setup of the TC itself. I have a NetGear WLAN router and its an "n" router. So the speed is good. I have my TC currently downstairs from the WLAN router. Therefore the TC is setup as simply a wireless harddrive. It speaks through the WLAN router in order to be available to all my laptops in my house. My question is whether it should instead be directly connected to the WLAN router using an ethernet cable? Would this improve my overall transfer rates to/from the TC?
    Thanks so much.

  • Queries with respect to Oracle 10g RAC - Primary & Standby DB environment

    Hi,
    Please guide in the following queries:
    On my 3 Node RAC with Primary DB, I have configured database backup (using Flashback) every 30min and I keep only one copy at a time. I also have a Physical Standby in the environment which has redo applied from primary with 30min delay.
    1. During recovery, is it possible to do recovery, on to the Primary DB, to a point-in-time which is 2 hr in past using the same flashback databse?
    2. Is it possible to restore the flashback database backup (taken from 3 Node RAC with Primary DB) into a NEW oracle setup which is different from the 3 Node RAC setup with Primary DB?
    3. If the Storage Device of 3 Node RAC setup fails, can I point the 3 Node instances on to a new Storage Device which has the backup of PrimaryDb restored from a StandBy db?
    Regards

    Is there anybody who can help on this?

  • Mixing geospatial queries with business rules

    Is there an easy way to incorporate a Spatial-/Locator-based geo-spatial query into an Oracle Business Rules rule? For example (pardon my psuedo-code):
    IF pub within 2 miles of my house AND pub sells cider THEN walk to pub
    If not then is there another way to break down this sort of problem?

    Hi Sri,
    1. Basics of BR ( Business Rules ) can be found in planning document ( there are 2 planning docs 1. user guide and 2. Admin guide). Pls find that
    2. From Planning perspective , we create Business Rules ,which are nothing but another version of essbase calculatino scripts , thats why you do see in EAS.
    3. Essbase training does not include Business Rules ( planning does include).If you are comfortable with calculation scripts, then BR's should be comfortable to you.
    4. To see BR's in shared services , I have a question , did you install Planning and all.
    Sandeep Reddy Enti
    HCC
    http://hyperionconsultancy.com/

  • Slow response of my data base

    Hi Dears.
    I am working on a database project. i have 5 pc and i have made a pc as a database server machine. the network is on peer to peer. so you can say there is a pc as database server with 4 work station which are accessing database on the server machine. initially the database response was very good but after 4000 records the response of database is too too much slow ( you can say in hanging).
    what i do to speed up the database response, i am bothering about slow response of data base.
    on server machin (i.e. is a pc) there is
    256 RAM, 2.4 GHz processor
    Windows XP
    Oracle 8 Enterprize Edition
    and Developer 6i
    plz help men in suggestion of good resposne

    Couple of things,
    1) With 256meg of RAM, it barely can be called a client machine let alone to be called a server machine.You seriously should have minimum 1gb to have somewhat performance from the system.
    2) You are running oracle 8.Its a really really REALLY old version. Any chance to have an idea that how much data would you store over this box? If your data is limited under 4gigs, than you may look at Oracle XE for your project. But again, machine's HW resource will come in between.
    3) Its not possible to have a guess about the performance degradation reasons just like that. It may be due to number of reasons. For example , in your case , the foremost reason is resource crunch. Try increasing this and than again use the box for some time. Feedback at that time how it is working.
    Aman....

  • Slow response time, applications won't load, etc.

    I'm writing this on behalf of my sister, who is on a MacBook Pro, operating Mac OS 10.4.8.
    Just yesterday, she began to notice extremely slow response time on her laptop, with applications taking up to 5 minutes to load sometimes, and the Internet subsequently taking ages to switch from page to page. The laptop is also constantly freezing up, with the spinning circle showing up frequently, as well as complete system freezes on and off.
    I went on the computer and repaired disk permissions, as well as verified the disk. All went fine. Tried to do a software update in order to update to 10.4.9, but the computer freezes before it can even really begin to download the information.
    Numerous reboots were also tried, with nothing working. I don't want to have to do something extreme like reinstalling the operating system without knowing that there might be a simpler solution, so that's why I'm here! I'd also like to know whether we can save her files (documents, etc.), if a reinstallation is needed.
    Edit: She reports that she did install or download any software or file attachments, and keeps insisting that the problem virtually came out of nowhere, in case this helps!
    Thanks!
    MacBook Pro   Mac OS X (10.4.9)  

    Alright-her computer has gotten progressively worse, and has not even managed to reach the log in screen for the past 10 minutes. Just a grey screen, an apple, and the little twirling loading thing.
    Am at a loss as to what to do...last night, I could log in, but it was still hanging and taking just about forever for it to do anything.
    Is a reformat the only thing left to do? She does subscribe to AppleCare-is it worth calling them, or will they just tell her to reformat as well?
    Edit: I'm beginning to think this might date back to a lightning storm we had a couple days ago-does this sort of behaviour seem to follow the behaviour or something that experienced an electrical surge? Her phone in the room was acting funny as well for a few days.

  • Where can i get the documentation for 9i DB Data Dictionary (all)

    Friends,
    I try to find the Oracle 9i Data Dictionary Documentation in the oracle document list.
    But i didnt find it. can anybody point me to the particular page or pdf?
    I need all the Data Dictionary details with explanation. is it available somewhere?
    thanks
    sathyguy

    easy access linky

  • Troubleshooting slow response to email via vpn

    I've just adopted a vpn 3000 concentrator, and am totally learing this, so my apologies.
    What could be reasons within a VPN enviroment that people are having slow response to email. (excluding issues with servers)
    From a network perspective I can trouble shoot slow response, but how would a vpn enviroment be any more different to troubleshoot.
    Naturally VPN is going to be much much slower, but taking 10 minutes for multiple users to get their email seems odd. LAN users get there email within seconds

    Hi:
    I'll tell you, I used to have the exact same problem at my last company.
    We had an Exchange server for email and everyone used Cisco's VPN client.
    Email was so slow, it was ridiculous sometimes. Everything else was OK, though. Other applications were OK, and network management was also good. It was just Exchange.
    I know that Exchange is notorious for being delay intolerant, but this was bad! and it seemed to get worse with time.
    Anyway, I dont know if you have done any troubleshooting yet or not, but you would definitely want to focus on the MTU settings for the VPN connection. Remember that IPSec adds overhead that may cause the ethernet frame to exceed the network's allowable MTU, so the packets get fragmented and reassembled at the receiving end. This can be a very slow process. And some applications are not very tolerant of fragmentation, like SQL and, I think, Exchange, too.
    The problem with client VPN is that you would have to adjust each user's PC MTU. With site-to-site VPN, you can, of course, set the maximum segment size of the entire tunnel, so all users sitting behind the tunnel will be forced to conform to the tunnel's stips.
    But you can try doing that on a few PCs to see if anything changes. I changed the PCs MTU using freeware called DR. TCP/IP. You can download it for free and it will allow you to change the PCs MTU very easily -- just a few keystrokes, instead of having to go into the registry and get stupid with Windows.
    Change the output segment size for the PC to, say, 1400, and see if that improves anything. You would also want to change it on the 3000. I forgot how to do it on the 3000.
    Victor

  • EBS r12 (12.0.6) giving slow response to clients.

    Hi,
    Anyone can help me to findout the bottleneck of slow response of EBS r12.
    We r using oracle 10g (10.2.0.3) and r12 (12.0.6).
    its urgent...plz.
    thx.

    Hi;
    Similar topic discussed before,Please check:
    -business Performance issuse
    Re: E-business Performance issuse
    You can also check [this search|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=performance&objID=c3&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15]
    Regard
    Helios

  • Slow response when query v$lock or some data dictionary

    Hello,
    We have a severe problem with our database performance problem. Here is the situation:
    1. When query data dictionary such as v$lock from any Windows machine on the network, the performance is slow (about 3 minutes.)
    2. When query v$lock directly on the server where database reside, the query come back fast (normal).
    3. When query user table such as employees from any windows machine on the network, the performance is normal.
    4. When query user table directly from server where the database reside, the query come back normal.
    Looking at v$session_wait on the slow query, it is waiting on "SQL*Net message to client".
    We have people from our network group, security group and did not find anything problem.
    Thank for you help!!!

    user8175606 wrote:
    Hello,
    We have a severe problem with our database performance problem. Here is the situation:
    1. When query data dictionary such as v$lock from any Windows machine on the network, the performance is slow (about 3 minutes.)
    2. When query v$lock directly on the server where database reside, the query come back fast (normal).
    3. When query user table such as employees from any windows machine on the network, the performance is normal.
    4. When query user table directly from server where the database reside, the query come back normal.
    Looking at v$session_wait on the slow query, it is waiting on "SQL*Net message to client".
    We have people from our network group, security group and did not find anything problem.
    Thank for you help!!!I saw the same problem several times. All of them were related with wrong execution plan in the v$lock (and dba_locks, and others based on v$lock). For instance due to "crazy" optimizer mode FIRST_ROWS.
    Also look at note 431770.1.
    I suggest that when you looked at v$session_wait and saw the event "SQL*Net message to client" state of the event was not = WAITING. Please check. It means that Oracle is not waiting but is burning CPU.
    Thus, please let us know - does another optimizer mode improve performance?
    select /*+ all_rows */ * from v$lock;
    select /*+ rule */ * from v$lock;

  • Slow response when entering data to an empty cell?

    Hey there...
    I have this issue that when I start entering data into an empty cell or owerwriting one, the response is slow; when I press a button on the keyboard it takes roughly 1 second before anything visual happens in the cell, but when the data "makes it way through" the response is normal when hitting the keyboard.
    Is anyone else experince a slow response when entering data to an empty cell in Number 09 or when overwriting one?/ Anyone familar with a similar issue, and is there anybody who knows how to fix this, or is it just normal for Numbers 09 to be a bit sluggish in the beginning when entering data?
    I've recently swithced from Excel 2007 to Numbers 09, so sorry if the terminology is incorrect.

    Question asked and answered several times.
    Numbers was not coded by brains but by feet so, it behave sadly when the AutoSave Lion feature apply.
    I posted a script getting rid of that.
    Start from a template or duplicate the existing document just after opening it then close the original and work on the duplicate.
    As it was never saved, AutoSave doesn't apply to it;
    From time to time (say at least every ten minutes) call my script.
    It wil duplicate the doc in progress and save it with a date_time stamped name.
    this way, you will continue to enter datas in a never saved document.
    Search for the string Auto_Save in the existing threads.
    It's late and I'm too tired to search for you.
    Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) lundi 26 décembre 2011 12:03:51
    iMac 21”5, i7, 2.8 GHz, 12 Gbytes, 1 Tbytes, mac OS X 10.6.8 and 10.7.2
    My iDisk is : http://public.me.com/koenigyvan
    Please : Search for questions similar to your own before submitting them to the community
    For iWork's applications dedicated to iOS, go to :
    https://discussions.apple.com/community/app_store/iwork_for_ios

  • Current date in BO queries with Universe built on Infocube

    Hi dear experts,
    We are facing the following issue :
    - we built a universe on top of a multiprovider (with 2 infocubes) since we don't want to manage BW Queries.
    - we need to restrict data on WebI queries using current date or system date (to compare with a date from the universe)
    No options to do that seem to be available through MDX in the universe.
    Has anyone already solved such an issue and how do you proceed?
    Thanks for your help.
    André

    Hi Andre,
    I assume you are aware that you are losing items when connecting to the cubes directly, such as restricted keyfigures, calculated keyfigures, variables, structures, navigational attributes, and the option to use authorization variables.
    In the universe right now you don't have an option to reference something like a system data - that is done with an EXIT variable in the query.
    Ingo

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do I add another computer to my wireless network

    My brother from Calgary is visiting me with his older MAC book Pro and we cannot seem to get him set up on my wireless network. I am using DLink wireless router with Airport.

  • Additionals Articles in Outbound Delivery.

    Hi Experts, I am very new in SAP Retail and I need your help for creating an end to end scenario for additionals articles. So here is an overview that so far I've done. Please let me know if you think that it might be a missing configuration or funct

  • Printing problems with a lexmark p4350

    It seems to work ok with regular printing but when I tried to print some photos the results were weak faded colours and some vertical lines that should not be there. I tried cleaning the cartridges both manually and mechanically with no good effect.

  • JTA and Oracle 8.1.6

              Newbie question.           We're using Weblogic 6.1 sp2 with Oracle 8.1.6.           What are my options for JDBC drivers to support JTA for CMT with our EJB's?           Thanks           

  • Hide db connection in url

    Hi, I'm trying to hide the url passed in a jsp. This url calls a Report. my url is like: http://pcias.ferroplast.es:7778/reports/rwservlet?destype=cache&report=e:\informes\todas_reclamaciones.rdf&desformat=HTMLCSS&server=rep_pcias&userid=scott/tiger@