SM30 issue in Quality after transport

I have 18 fields in my custom table and there is a TMG for this table. In the dev system, I see all the fields in SM30, but after moving to QA, I see only 12 fields. Please help me in what could be the issue.

I think you should check if this table has any Request that was not transported to QA.
possibly be the reason.
as a solution you should go up the package from the table and create a Request for it and carry it to QA.

Similar Messages

  • BI Technical Content datasources not found in Quality after transport

    HI All
    I am trying to implement BI technical Content for Admin Cockpit. I was able to implement Technical content Infocubes successfully in development box but when I collected the objects and transported to Quality(collected oblects in seperate requests: info objects in one request, datasources in one request, infocubes, transfer rules and updated rules in one request), I am not able to find the datasources in quality in myself sourcesystem even after repication. but the transport for technical content datasources is successfull. The following are the datasources:
           Comment Entry: Released
           DataSource Replica
               0TCT_DS01                     D17CLNT208
               0TCT_DS02                     D17CLNT208
               0TCT_DS03                     D17CLNT208
               0TCT_DS11                     D17CLNT208
               0TCT_DS12                     D17CLNT208
               0TCT_DS21                     D17CLNT208
               0TCT_DS22                     D17CLNT208
               0TCT_DS23                     D17CLNT208
    can anyone tell me why I am not able to find the datasources in Quality after successfull transport.
    We are on SAP_BW     700   SAPKW70016     SAP NetWeaver BI 7.0.
    thanks

    thanks for your quick responce. I was not able to collect the datasources so I had to manually input them in the transport request. But it worked.
    thanks once again.

  • Assignment of Source System in quality after transport

    Hi Experts,
    We have implemented the Inventory management standard flow in Development,
    Now to tell you, we have multiple landscape over here,
    Depending on the project, and the fesiblility for the client, the tranport layer is been decided,
    But for sure we have multiple source system,
    By multiple source system, i mean not the other components like R/3, SRM or APO,
    but for R/3 itself we have multiple boxes at each layer,
    Now when transported to quality,
    the standard objects are reflecting after few errors corrected and re transports,
    But the source system which it has picked for the BF BX and UM datasource is not that i require according to the transports landing for the R/3 developments,
    AT DEVELOPMENT LAYER,
    BW development is GDA, which is having the source system connection to development R/3 (GD0),
    AT QUALITY
    We have BW as EQ3,
    For R/3 we have EQ0 and NR0,
    All the transports have reached in the respective target quality system,
    But the data sources are having source system connection to NR0 and not EQ0,
    I want it to be EQ0 as the data lies over there.
    How do i resolve this ?
    Thanks and should be appricated for your efforts in helping.

    Hi Daljeet,
    You should set the Source system Conversion option in Transport Connection before Transporting the objects to QA and PRD.
    You can do this using the button 'Conversion' next to the button 'Source System Assignment'. Here you can specify the Target source system name after the Transport.
    If you want to change all the assignments from NR0 to EQ0, this article will be helpful for you.
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/805eefcd-5428-2d10-c0ab-dc27a95b2c81
    Get the help of your BASIS team also.
    Refer this thread.
    Re: source system in RSA1 is diiferent to the datasource in infoprovider

  • Problem in activating Process chain in Quality after transport

    Hi All,
    We have moved a set of process chain to Quality system.
    When tried to activate the Process chain it is showing error in DTP.
    The DTP name is same as in the Dev system.
    So, we tried moving the DTP alone in another transport request.
    Still the error exists. We also tried moving the process chain again.
    We had tried importing only the structure and also the entire flow again.
    Nothing worked.
    Please suggest some solution.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Geetha

    Thanks for yor reply.
    Suman,
    I have checked the Object Changeablity now in Dev system, I found it like Not changable for DTPA.
    The DTP from DSO to Cube is fine, but we have problem with the DTP from DataSource to DSO.
    Also, in the dev system when i clicked on Object Changeablity I get a popup like "System can be changed; settings not necessary".
    Please suggest me like what must be done.
    Prashantk & Arvind,
    We imported the Process Chain along with the DTP first and we faced the problem.
    So we imported the DTP alone again, but still we had the problem.
    Again we imported the Process Chain after importing the DTPs.
    So what i feel is DTPs must be there in the Quality, but why we have the problem persisting.
    That too only for DTP from Data Source to DSO but not for the DTP from DSO to Cube.
    Regards,
    Geetha
    Edited by: Geetha Devi Ramalingam on Jul 12, 2011 9:43 AM

  • DTP After transport double

    Hi Experts,
    One DTP is already present in quality and executing everyday, same we have maintain some filters and transported again from development to Quality, after transport duplicate DTP is generated.
    Can any one help me on this point, why two DTP's are generated after transport.
    Thanks in advance.
    Rams.

    Rams.. welcome to SDN!!
    This is how DTP behaves...sometime it will generate a new technical name for the same DTP in the target system or its like it will have a new technical name when or if transported then it can have a different technical name from that of development system.
    Thats why i always create the DTP in the systems and never transport except to be used in the process chains.so you should have changed the same DTP again in quality instead of doing the transports.
    In your case if the DTP was already present in the quality and if you created a new one in the development then it is bound to have a different technical name and therefore both will sit in the quality.
    Thanks
    Ajeet

  • Issue with migrated transformation rule after transport

    Hello all,
    We have migrated couple of update rules and transfer rules to transformation rules. All the transformation rules are active in development environment.
    The issue is when we transport these transformation rules to QA, one of the fields of datapacket dimension "RECORD" becomes &R1& in the global structure of start routine and therefore, transport fails in QA. Along with this we had another issue that if we add any additional fields in the cube or ODS structure, the global structure in start routine doesn't change after transport in QA. Basically, it seems like it doesn't do anything when we do transport.
    We tried couple of things by transporting entire flow inclding target and source objects, we also tried transporting only transformation with overwrite mode. But none of the things worked. We also have logged the message with SAP.
    SAP suggested us to open the QA environment and perform the change manually. We did it and obviously we could activate the transformation rules. But when we tried to re-transport the transformation, it is keep failing with the error "Syntax Error". My assumption has after the transport, the field has become &R1& again.
    Has anybody faced such issue? We are on Ehp1 SP7.
    - Danny

    Thanks Murali,
    Yes as I mentioned SAP suggested us to open the box and do it manually, but once we are done with the manual changes, we tried transporting the same transformation rule again, which I guess going to be the case in case of any future enhancement. Transport failed and it says "Syntax Error".
    The transformations we activated manually in the target system are active, but when we try to load the data, it throws the exception error.
    Any clue ?? Is it working fine in your system after you did manual changes? Did all future transport go well ?
    - Danny

  • Pricing Routine is not getting called after transport to quality

    Hello,
    We have created a new routine under Condition base value formulas. We have done all the required settings so that it is called while creating / changing sales order. Our routine is working fine in Development server but after transporting it to quality it is not getting called. We can see the routine in VOFM but in debugging mode the system is not able to find the routine.
    Can anybody please tell me what setting is missing in quality?
    Thanks in Advance.
    Priyanka.

    HI,
    Pls ececute this report RV80HGEN in SE38 tcode then only the routine will works for first time.
    Regards,
    kishore.

  • Issue faced in QA environment after transport

    Hi
    We have successfully transported the app set from Dev to QA environment. After transporting we are facing the following issue.
    EVDRE not working ' throwing WEB server error for the Reports in the QA server. But The same  Reports are working fine in Dev server.
    system Performance has come down.
    Also successful transport to the QA environment, we have make some changes in the BPF in the Dev environment and then try to transport the same to QA environment. The changes for the BPF is not reflecting in QA. Do I need to transport the Appset once more?
    Looking forward to hear from you.
    Thanks
    Krish
    Edited by: Krishnendu Pal on Aug 24, 2011 3:34 AM

    Hi Krish,
    Please take a look at the SAP Note: 14769898.

  • Workflow issue after transport to QA system

    Greetings,
      After transport to QA my workflow does not execute the job I've assigned to my step.
    I have a program assigned as a background job in a step that gets triggered by a typical workflow event.
    I believe this is the first workflow for their system... and it's definately my first as well.
    I can see the workflow executing using the trace.... but my job never runs.
    I'm beginning to suspect I need to refresh the workflow buffer... but perhaps it's an authorization issue
      Please advise...
    Doug -

    Doug:
    First refresh the memory of the workflow to take the new changes ok, transaction SWU_OBUF.
    Just to be sure, check the transaction SWU3 and check if everything is OK.
    The posible authorization problem is for the User WF-BATCH, so check the authorizations for this user.
    Best Regards,
    Jessica

  • Issues in Process chain after Transporting to Q

    Hi All
    I have couple of issues with my process chain (in Q). We have recently upgraded from BW3.5 to BI7.0. After upgrade i have a change made to one of my Process chain. i have transported it successfully to Q system. I have collected all the related objects associated with the change in the transport. But when try to see the changes changes in the process chain in Q system i have the following issues.
    1. i do not see my changes in display mode. But i am able to see all the changes if i go to change mode (this looks weird and i dont know why)
    2. i am unable to schdule the process chain in Q system as i was able to do earlier. Now it is asking for Transport when i try to schedule the process chain. this was not the case earlier.
    3. In the transport i also collected a newly created infopackage and added it to the Process chain. But i do not see any link between the infopackage and the process chain (it was supposed to have a link as it had in DEV), i mean when i go to  infopackage it used to give me a mesage saying the infopackage is already available in Process chain which i got in DEV.
    All the above cases were working per normal in DEV systems tested and were collected as required in the transports and moved to Q
    Please let me know ASAP if any of you have encountered similar problems before and have solutions. i saw couple of related threads (some suggested to directly activate the process chain in Q system by opening the Q systems as an alternate) but could not find a solution
    Any sort of help will be really appreciated
    Thanks
    HK

    1. Display mode shows only the active version of Process chain. When you go into change mode, it displays the inactive version (if any available). Make sure you activate the process chain in the change mode. Then the chain you see in display and change mode will be in sync.
    2. When you try to schedule, the Process chain will be activated as well. If your Q system is prompting for transport then probably the system is open for changes. If you want to modify process chains in Q and P systems, make appropriate Object Changeability settings in Transport connection in Q and P systems and make sure the system is closed for changes (SCC4).
    3. Use Transport connection to collect the objects required for Process chain. After transport, check the transport log and make sure all the objects are imported successfully.
    Regards,
    Sree

  • Hierarchy Analysis Authorization does not work after transport

    Hi Gurus,
    I am facing a issue in hierarchy analysis authorization in quality system but the same authorization works perfectly fine in development.
    All hierarchy authorizations works in Quality except for this one. I found one old sap note describing this as program error but this note is not applicable in BW 7.3.
    I have checked the table RSECVAL, RSECHIER and authorization is active so everything looks good. Please advise if anyone faced this issue after transporting hierarchy auths to other systems
    Regards,
    Salman

    Salman,
    What I understood from your description is that you have same role+AA in Dev and QA, which provides access in Dev for all the nodes for said hierarchy but in QA, same role+AA provides access to the same hierarchy for all the nodes but one. Try to create a ZTEST analysis authorization in QA itself with access for the problematic hierarchy node and see if it works ? This will rule out the case if there is a difference in hierarchy in DEV & QA.
    Regards,
    Shivraj Singh

  • Custom OM infotype issue in Quality Server

    Hi,
    I created a custom infotype in PPCJ. Its working fine in development server.
    We transport the request to Quality server and created a record in PO13 t-code for the custom infotype.
    There i am getting a success message that 'Record is created'. If i check in tables HRP9009 and HRT9009
    can't able to see the datas which are created.
    Its working fine in development server, but not in Quality. Have anybody faced this type of issue?
    Please provide some solution on this.

    Hi Santosh,
    Thanks for your reply....
    I have done cache refresh and also crosschecked all the objects comparing with DE system but i am wondering how i am getting file payload in jdbc channel and jdbc payload in file channel after transporting from DEV to QAS.
    Thanks in advance...
    Naveen.

  • Profile not generated after transport.

    Hi All,
    We are facing an issue in which I transported a role from DEV to PRODUCTION through Q.
    Our role is generated in DEV......but not in Q and Production.
    As per earlier posts in the forum,I checked table PRGN_CUST in the DEV and PROFILE_TRANSPORT value is  set to YES.
    Also,the role was added to the transport only after profile was generated
    Has anyone faced similar issues?
    Peeyush.

    Hi Piyeeush,
    Did you found a solution to your problem? I have the same issue!
    I've created a new role in Dev, created & generated the profile. Once role is transported in Quality, the profile is transported but with the status : Current version not generated.
    the strangest part is that i didn't realize that directly... in the meanwhile, the role was already in used in production by a test user who didn't encountered any problem while testing!
    basically, the role is now in production, used by one user who can execute all transaction listed in the role... but the profile isnt generated and the user comparison cannot be complete due to that.
    any explanations?
    maybe i should create a new topic tho

  • ALV Title Not Display after transporting the Programme from DeV to Qlty

    Hellow Experts,
    i developed one ALV report with two screens, i transported the report from Development server to Qulaity server.
    in Development server report are working fine  but in Qulaity server after transporting the TiTle of ALV not display , plz give me some hint , below is my code to display alv title
    DATA: alv_grid       TYPE REF TO cl_gui_alv_grid.
    DATA:alv_grid_ref type ref to CL_GUI_ALV_GRID.
    DATA: layout    TYPE lvc_s_layo.
    layout-grid_title = 'Daily Material Reports.' .
    DATA: fieldcat  TYPE lvc_t_fcat.
    I m using  ALL METHOD alv_grid->set_table_for_first_display method for display alv .
    Thanks,
    Regards
    Neha.

    Hi neha,
    use the sap/help link to solve your issue,
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/0a/b5533cd30911d2b467006094192fe3/content.htm]
    if not use the below example code ,
    Heading 3 :h3  Set the title of the grid
    Fill the grid_title field of structure lvc_s_layo.
    Note that the structure lvc_s_layo can be used for to customize the grid appearance in many ways.
    DATA:
    ALV control: Layout structure
    gs_layout TYPE lvc_s_layo.
    For example :
    Set grid title
    gs_layout-grid_title = 'Flights'.
    CALL METHOD go_grid->set_table_for_first_display
                EXPORTING
               i_structure_name = 'SFLIGHT'
    is_layout      =gs_layout*
               CHANGING 
              it_outtab   = gi_sflight.
    Regards,
    Saravana.S
    Edited by: saravanasap on Dec 21, 2011 8:13 AM

  • Error after transport of Virtual Cube with Services

    Hi All,
    would any body can suggest me how we can change the source system assignment in QA or Production client for virtual Cube with Services.
    A virtual cube is created with Services using the settings for RFC and using the logical source system. however after transporting the same to the QA system the Logical Source System has not changed and thus it is giving error " Error occured while determining target system for the logical system" would any body can suggest me how i can change the logical source system assignment in QA system for Virtual Cube with services.
    Points would be rewarded appropriately.
    Cheers
    Noor

    Hi Noor,
    Check this link, it may help you.
    Re: Transport issue - Source system does not exist
    Regards,
    Vijay G.

Maybe you are looking for

  • I-Pod frozen after updating to 7.01

    I have an I-pod 5th generation 30g video. Win XP I've read through some of the other posts, but haven't found a solution. I bought the Majhong game and had to update to 7.0. Now my screen freezes and I can't disconnect from I-tunes (eject button or r

  • How to make a photograph look like a hand drawn cartoon in Photoshop or illustrator?

    Hi all- I'm taking a childrens book writing and illustrating class and my illustrating skills are nil. I want the photos to look like a "Cartoon" and want to create the pictures for the book but not sure which filters work best for this effect. Would

  • HT204387 When I connect my Iphone 4S IOS 7.1 to my 2014 Dodger Charger with Uconnect Bluetooth

    After the connection it always starts to play music. Also my Iphone no longer uses its internal speaker for anything. all sounds go thru the bluetooth connection. If I choose another source in the car for music like the raido all sounds go away from

  • HRMS Integration with third party Project Management Tool

    Hi All, We have plans of procurring a third party Project Management Tool which needs to be integrated to existing Oracle Financials. Project Management Tool needs employee information for its functioning. a)Is there any API available for this purpos

  • Re: Battery life in mountain lion

    ACTUALLY, the computer is supposed to take a nap during the battery test - otherwise it's not fair. So after 3 hours, put it to sleep for 3 hours while continuing to count. Then continue with the monitor off. Thus, you arrive at the 'up to 7 hours' n