Solaris 10 express developer ed. dvd checksum error

Hi,
I downloaded the solaris 10 express developer ed. dvd. I used Sun Download manager for the download. the file e had checksum error. Hence the DVD contains checksum error. Is there any way we could correct the download without the need re-download the entire file. Other files ending a,b,c,e dont have this problem. Am i the only one getting this problem or is it a known issue?
with regards,
ashwin

Sorry there is no real way to solve this other than downloading the last segment of the file.

Similar Messages

  • Solaris Express Developer Edition, free DVD kit

    Today I ordered the "Free Solaris Express Developer Edition DVD":
    "For a limited time, Sun is offering a Solaris Express Developer Edition DVD for x86 platforms mailed to you at no charge." (http://developers.sun.com/sxde/download.jsp)
    Will I get the new 9/07 version or an older one? When I ordered Solaris 10 some time ago, Sun sent me version 11/06.
    Thanks!

    Well, it looks like this version of Solaris simply forgot to bundle the FLAC gstreamer plugin. Does anyone know where to find a version compiled for solaris?

  • Error installing Oracle 10gR2 on Solaris Express Developer Edition

    Hi
    I'm trying to install Oracle Db 10gR2 on Solaris Express Developer Edition 1/08 for x86 but it fails with the following link error:
    INFO: /export/home/u01/app/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/bin/genclntsh
    INFO: ld: fatal:
    INFO: symbol `ntcontab' in file /export/home/u01/app/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/lib/libn10.a(ntcontab.o): section [3] .data: size 0x60: symbol (address 0, size 0x70) lies outside of containing section
    INFO: ld:
    INFO: fatal:
    INFO: File processing errors. No output written to
    INFO: /export/home/u01/app/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/lib/libclntsh.so.10.1
    INFO:
    INFO: genclntsh: Failed to link libclntsh.so.10.1
    INFO: *** Error code 1
    INFO: make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `client_sharedlib'
    Any ideas would be appreciated.
    Thanks

    If your version of Solaris is not supported, see the support matrix, you are on your own. This is likely the case.

  • Solaris Express Developer 9/07  gcc can't find GTK-2

    Solaris Express Developer 9/07 configure can't find GTK-2
    located in /usr/lib/gtk-2.0 & /usr/include/gtk-2.0
    It is my understanding that default ld includes /usr/lib (i.e. crle ouput)
    Any help appreciated.
    John
    Update:
    installed packages /opt/cfw
    atk-1.10.1-Solaris10-x86.pkg
    gtk-2.8.3-Solaris10-x86.pkg
    cairo-1.0.0-Solaris10-x86.pkg
    pango-1.10.0-Solaris10-x86.pkg
    glib-2.8.1-Solaris10-x86.pkg
    Configuration file [version 4]: /var/ld/ld.config
    Platform: 32-bit LSB 80386
    Default Library Path (ELF): /lib:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib:/opt/sfw/lib:/opt/cfw/lib:/opt/gnu/lib
    Trusted Directories (ELF): /lib/secure:/usr/lib/secure (system default)
    Command line:
    crle -c /var/ld/ld.config -l /lib:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib:/opt/sfw/lib:/opt/cfw/lib:/opt/gnu/lib
    Still fails!
    Edited by: jhawk on Oct 10, 2007 7:01 PM

    jhawk@solaris-devx gftp-2.0.18rc1 >export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/cfw/lib/gtk-2.0:/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib:/opt/sfw/lib
    jhawk@solaris-devx gftp-2.0.18rc1 >./configure --prefix=/usr/local
    checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/ginstall -c
    checking whether build environment is sane... yes
    checking for gawk... no
    checking for mawk... no
    checking for nawk... nawk
    checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
    checking build system type... i386-pc-solaris2.11
    checking host system type... i386-pc-solaris2.11
    checking for gcc... gcc
    checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
    checking whether the C compiler works... yes
    checking whether we are cross compiling... no
    checking for suffix of executables...
    checking for suffix of object files... o
    checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
    checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
    checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
    checking for style of include used by make... GNU
    checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3
    checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
    checking for egrep... egrep
    checking for AIX... no
    checking for ANSI C header files... yes
    checking for sys/types.h... yes
    checking for sys/stat.h... yes
    checking for stdlib.h... yes
    checking for string.h... yes
    checking for memory.h... yes
    checking for strings.h... yes
    checking for inttypes.h... yes
    checking for stdint.h... yes
    checking for unistd.h... yes
    checking minix/config.h usability... no
    checking minix/config.h presence... no
    checking for minix/config.h... no
    checking for ranlib... ranlib
    checking for special C compiler options needed for large files... no
    checking for FILEOFFSET_BITS value needed for large files... 64
    checking for LARGEFILES value needed for large files... no
    checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
    checking for function prototypes... yes
    checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes
    checking for string.h... (cached) yes
    checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
    checking for inline... inline
    checking whether the printf family of functions supports %'ld... yes
    checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
    checking for gawk... (cached) nawk
    checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/ginstall -c
    checking whether ln -s works... yes
    checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cached) yes
    checking for dirent.h that defines DIR... yes
    checking for library containing opendir... none required
    checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes
    checking for sys/wait.h that is POSIX.1 compatible... yes
    checking fcntl.h usability... yes
    checking fcntl.h presence... yes
    checking for fcntl.h... yes
    checking libutil.h usability... no
    checking libutil.h presence... no
    checking for libutil.h... no
    checking limits.h usability... yes
    checking limits.h presence... yes
    checking for limits.h... yes
    checking malloc.h usability... yes
    checking malloc.h presence... yes
    checking for malloc.h... yes
    checking pty.h usability... no
    checking pty.h presence... no
    checking for pty.h... no
    checking for strings.h... (cached) yes
    checking sys/ioctl.h usability... yes
    checking sys/ioctl.h presence... yes
    checking for sys/ioctl.h... yes
    checking sys/time.h usability... yes
    checking sys/time.h presence... yes
    checking for sys/time.h... yes
    checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes
    checking for stdint.h... (cached) yes
    checking sys/mkdev.h usability... yes
    checking sys/mkdev.h presence... yes
    checking for sys/mkdev.h... yes
    checking for inttypes.h... (cached) yes
    checking for socklen_t in sys/socket.h... yes
    checking for mode_t... yes
    checking for intptr_t in stdint.h... yes
    checking for pid_t... yes
    checking for size_t... yes
    checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes
    checking whether struct tm is in sys/time.h or time.h... time.h
    checking for off_t... yes
    checking size of off_t... 8
    checking for working alloca.h... yes
    checking for alloca... yes
    checking whether gcc needs -traditional... no
    checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes
    checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes
    checking for getpagesize... yes
    checking for working mmap... yes
    checking return type of signal handlers... void
    checking for strftime... yes
    checking whether utime accepts a null argument... yes
    checking for gai_strerror... no
    checking for getaddrinfo... no
    checking for getcwd... yes
    checking for gettimeofday... yes
    checking for getwd... yes
    checking for mkdir... yes
    checking for mktime... yes
    checking for putenv... yes
    checking for rmdir... yes
    checking for select... yes
    checking for socket... no
    checking for strdup... yes
    checking for strstr... yes
    checking for strtod... yes
    checking for strtol... yes
    checking for uname... yes
    checking for grantpt... yes
    checking for openpty... no
    checking for getdtablesize... yes
    checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
    checking for glib-2.0 >= 2.0.0... yes
    checking GLIB_CFLAGS... -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
    checking GLIB_LIBS... -lglib-2.0
    checking for openpty in -lutil... no
    checking for socket in -lsocket... yes
    checking for gethostbyname in -lnsl... yes
    checking whether to use readline... yes
    checking for readline in -lreadline... no
    checking for readline in -lreadline... no
    checking for readline in -lreadline... no
    checking for readline in -lreadline... no
    checking for log10 in -lm... yes
    checking if malloc debugging is wanted... no
    checking for gtk+-2.0 >= 2.0.0... configure: error: You have GLIB 2.0 installed but I cannot find GTK+ 2.0. Run configure with --disable-gtk20 or install GTK+ 2.0
    jhawk@solaris-devx gftp-2.0.18rc1 >

  • A problem logging in in Solaris Express Developer Edition 05/07

    Hi all.
    I just upgraded Solaris 10 11/06 to Solaris Express Developer Edition 05/07 on a Sun Ultra 20 M2 and a strange problem arose: after root has logged in in a Gnome session, then when another user tries to log in in Gnome everything slows down: the login screen with "Window manager" takes some 20 secs to go away and then "Panel" sticks there... The only option is killing X with ctrl+alt+backspce. This only happens if root logs in with Gnome, and not in CDE. If root doesn't log in, nothing strange happens ever.
    The problem seems unrelated with the user that logs in:
    - existing users which could login in Solaris 10 11/06 now have this problem
    - new users have this problem too...
    Rebooting the machine and never logging in to Gnome with root "solves" the problem.
    Has anyone ever had this problem?
    Can be a problem relating to upgrading?
    Thanks,
    Enrico.

    You should probably direct SXDE queries to the forums at http://opensolaris.org, more chance of a response from the JDS developers there.
    Message was edited by:
    calum

  • Solaris Express Developer x86 -- only 64-bit?

    Hi, people, glad to be back. Just downloaded Solaris Express Developer edition x86 and installed -- almost with no problems.
    It's a system with Intel Celeron D with 64-bit and Hyper Threading support, DDR2 1Gb.
    Now running Solaris I noticed it's a 64-bit version, not 32-bit, as I meant to have. The command `isainfo -n` gives back ... "amd64"!
    Is there a 32-bit version of Solaris Express DE x86?
    Or maybe I need not worry at all and keep running the 64-bit one (actually, I've got no problem as yet)?
    Thanks in advance for any comments.

    So, my system supports 64-bit computing after all. I
    never thought about it, in fact.
    But does it mean Solaris Express DE x86 runs as
    64-bit on the systems supporting 64-bit, and as
    32-bit on 32-bit-only systems?Yes, that's correct. Solaris 10 was the first version of Solaris to support 64 bit operation on the x86 architecture.
    It and later versions (including Solaris Express DE x86) should automatically detect the architecture and run in that mode at boot time. There are some ways to force it to run in 32 bit mode only if necessary, but that would be unusual.
    Darren

  • Solaris Express Developer Questions

    Currently I am running Solaris Express Developer however i noticed there is no Subversion or CVS installed by default.
    The version I am running is as follows.
    bash-3.00$ uname -a
    SunOS solaris-devx 5.11 snv_55b i86pc i386 i86pc
    Any ideas if there is a newer version, and whether it has subversion and cvs installed by default?
    Thanks

    I have looked at the latest download for Solaris Express, Developer Edition 2/07 which is what I am running now.
    I have connected the Sun Update Manager and I receive no updates.
    Currently I am trying to use this as my development platform/workstation at work. Developing java applications seems to be well catered for however some sections of the desktop environment look a little rough.
    I am having issues printing from Evince and Gimp, which seem to be using a different printing interface to other applications.
    It seems that this "Developer Platform" may be a little green for use as a workstation without some proper update mechanisms...

  • Help me in Installing Solaris Express, Developer Edition  X 86

    Hi,
    Help me in installing Solaris Express, Developer Edition
    When i am trying to install Solaris, system hangs and the moniter is switcher off when the system goes in GUI mode.
    i have intel 945GTP mother board with as on board Intel Graphics Media Accelerator Drives , Chipset -> Intle 945G , 160 SATA Hard Disk, 1 GB DDR2 Ram , P4 3.Ghz Processer , on board Intel PRO/100 VE Network Card.
    Please,Help me.
    Thanking you,
    P.Sathish Kumar

    Hello,
    first of all: Try to run the HCTS (Hardware
    Compatibility Test Suite) first, it's available
    here:
    http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/hcts/device_detect.htm
    l
    This you can run from Windows, and it will list all
    hardware that has drivers, and all those, that do not
    have drivers (including some public domain drivers).
    After that, you have the possibility to install
    Solaris WITHOUT a GUI, use one of the two "terminal"
    modes. The first Is still a GUI, as it only starts X
    and opens a terminal, in which then the installer
    runs. The second does NOT start X, but runs the
    installer on the console. Try this one, and once you
    get through that, you can afterwards figure out the
    settings of the Xserver.Hi ,
    i have installed the solaris using console.
    Still GUI is not starting, the moniter is switched off when GUI gets started
    I used Hardware Compatibility Test Suite, its say that system is supported
    by Solaris.
    Should i have change BIOS setting to stated the system
    Bye
    P.Sathish Kumar

  • Help me in installing Solaris Express, Developer Edition X86

    Hi,
    Help me in installing Solaris Express, Developer Edition
    When i am trying to install Solaris, system hangs and the moniter is switcher off when the system goes in GUI mode.
    i have intel 945GTP mother board with as on board Intel Graphics Media Accelerator Drives , Chipset -> Intle 945G , 160 SATA Hard Disk, 1 GB DDR2 Ram , P4 3.Ghz Processer , on board Intel PRO/100 VE Network Card.
    Please,Help me.
    Thanking you,
    P.Sathish Kumar

    Hello,
    first of all: Try to run the HCTS (Hardware
    Compatibility Test Suite) first, it's available
    here:
    http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/hcts/device_detect.htm
    l
    This you can run from Windows, and it will list all
    hardware that has drivers, and all those, that do not
    have drivers (including some public domain drivers).
    After that, you have the possibility to install
    Solaris WITHOUT a GUI, use one of the two "terminal"
    modes. The first Is still a GUI, as it only starts X
    and opens a terminal, in which then the installer
    runs. The second does NOT start X, but runs the
    installer on the console. Try this one, and once you
    get through that, you can afterwards figure out the
    settings of the Xserver.Hi ,
    i have installed the solaris using console.
    Still GUI is not starting, the moniter is switched off when GUI gets started
    I used Hardware Compatibility Test Suite, its say that system is supported
    by Solaris.
    Should i have change BIOS setting to stated the system
    Bye
    P.Sathish Kumar

  • Solaris Express Developer Ed. 5/07 boot crashes

    * Crash 1:
    I successfully installed Solaris Express Developer Ed. 5/07 on a Dell Inspiron 510m laptop, but after rebooting and selecting Solaris Express from the grub boot menu, the screen gets filled with:
    Nested trap, calling reset()
    Nested trap, calling reset()
    .. and the computer reboots.
    * Crash 2:
    I also successfully installed Solaris Express Developer Ed. 5/07 on a AMD64 3200+, Gigabyte GA-K8N-SLI, but after rebooting and selecting Solaris Express from the grub boot menu, a message like this is shown (for a split second before restarting) if I boot into 32-bit mode or "failsafe mode":
    module "ehci" something something, "NULL dereference" something.
    If I boot into (default) 64-bit mode, there is another type of crash output that is not possible to read. Looks like some kind of kernel panic.
    The only way I get Solaris Express working is by installing it in VMWare, but that is too slow on those two computers.
    What to do? Is there anything I could try except running in 32-bit mode?

    but installing linux on my computer with two sata
    disk teached me to ask carefully from experienced
    people before going to insall the OS.
    I have
    hda1 windows
    hdb4 linux ext3
    hdb3 linux swap
    hdb5 solaris partition (i think)
    i'm not sure you can install solaris partition on extended partition?!
    usually, we install solaris on a primary partition, and if the first partition of the extended one is FAT32, solaris can mount it
    What i am looking to know is, whether any one shared
    idea dn experience and screenshot about developing
    java applications in solaris.search on netbeans site, there are many screenshots
    Also I can not find whether SxDE has Sun N1 grid with
    itself or not.
    i don't understand what relation you see between java developpment and N1 grid? N1 grid is to deploy apps and/or OS on many machines, isn't it? but i think you can download it on sun site.
    hth,
    gerard

  • TCP stalls often on Solaris Express Developer 02/07 on VMWare1.0.2 on WinXP

    Hi there.
    I got an older version of Solaris Express running fine on an amd box, and before upgrading to Solaris Express Developer edition 02/07, I wanted to try the new one out on vmware. Then I encountered some network wieredness. The IP stack seems to stall when I try to download big files.
    Here is what I done:
    installed Solaris Express Dev. on VMWare 1.0.2,
    disabled DHCP with the GUI tool,
    gave a static address
    disabled IPV6 by deleting /etc/hostname6.pcn0
    When I try some download from blastwave.org with pkg-get, the download goes on for about 10 seconds, then it stalls. Under that situation, ping doesn't reach my adsl modem and dig cannot resolve hostnames. The stall recovers after several minutes, runs for a while, then stalls again.
    Is anyone experiencing anything similar ?
    I have ubuntu linux successfully running on the same vmware server.

    We are facing very similar (the same?) problem.
    Does anyone have a solution to this?

  • Differences between Soalris and Solaris Express /Developer Edition

    Hi
    Thank you for readingn my post
    What is different between Solaris Express (Developer Edition) and solaris OS?
    Are they the same and with same capabilities?
    Can I install S1 Grid suite in a Express edition?
    Thanks

    Solaris 10 (with several updates) is the current release version of the Solaris operating system.
    Since the release in '05, Sun has been developing the "next" version of Solaris. Using the OpenSolaris code as a base, this version is codenamed "Nevada". Periodic builds of this version are available as Solaris Express. So you get more up-to-date drivers, features, and bugs from it. Because it's under development, there are no patches. Instead you'd need to upgrade to the next release (or create your own patch).
    I haven't looked specifically at S1 Grid, so it very likely will install. However installations on Solaris Express may not be a supported configuration if you need that.
    Darren

  • Solaris Express , Developer Edition as a linux alternative

    Hi Folks,
    there is no doubt that Solaris began shining lately . I'm thinking to install it on my laptop as an alternative to linux to develop web applications .
    some issues are bothering my a lot, I'll name them to you ,so we can decide together :
    1. ruby official website does not provide a solaris package, how to develop Rails websites then ?
    2. Mono has no official package for x86 machines running solaris , only Solaris 8 (Sparc) is supported .
    I'm very interested in Solaris, especially Developer edition , eager to start to installing it !
    what do you think ?

    I think I hope it installs, especially on a laptop system. It failes to install on every desktop system here, I wouldn't dare put it in my laptop and see what it says. Laptops usually have a more esoteric hardware configuration than desktop systems.
    For you I really don't see the benefit of switching operating systems just to develop web applications. If you were a Java developer developing J2EE web applications then Solaris and it's integrated Java Enterprise system and first-rate developer tools would be a great change, but for Ruby on Rails and Mono - I don't see the point.
    For Ruby there may be a package available, check the OpenSolaris website and see if it has been ported over (it most probably has been, but I haven't checked yet).
    For Mono... I don't see the point in developing .NET web applications for Linux/Solaris, so I won't go there. Mono is a joke compared to Microsoft's .NET platform.

  • Solaris Express Developer Edition + Apple Airport Extreme

    I just installed Solaris Express Develper Edition without any problems, but I can't seem to get my wireless connection up and running. I use an Apple Airport Extreme and while my MacBook with Mac OS X and my Xubuntu machine have no problems connecting to the internet through the Airport, my Solaris says he can't connect.
    I allready disabled the Auto-magic stuff so I can setup the connection manually. I did it with the following two commands:
    svcadm disable svc:/network/physical:nwam
    svcadm enable svc:/network/physical:default
    The wireless interface ath0 can detect all the available networks (including mine), so it works.
    My Airport uses WPA/WPA2 Personal and DHCP.
    In the Network settings of Solaris I've set the properties of the wireless ath0 interface as follows:
    * enable this connection
    * activate on boot
    * network name (ESSID): my network is detected and I can select it from the dropdown list of available networks
    * Key Type: Plain (ASCII)
    * WEP key: my WEP key (the thing I filled in as WPA/WPA2 Personal on my airport)
    * Connection settings Configuration: DHCP
    I click OK and then try to activate the ath0 interface, but it doesn't work. The message is:
    "Could noet enable the interface ath0
    Check that the settings are correct for this network and that the computer is correctly connected to it".
    Which is frustrating, because as far as I know, the settings are correct (ESSID, WEP, ...) and the computer is correctly connected as it can detect all the available wifi networks in my area.
    Does anybody have any idea? Thnx in advace,
    Nico

    In the Network settings of Solaris I've set the properties of the wireless ath0 interface as follows:
    * enable this connection
    * activate on boot
    * network name (ESSID): my network is detected and I can select it from the dropdown list of available networks
    * Key Type: Plain (ASCII)
    * WEP key: my WEP key (the thing I filled in as WPA/WPA2 Personal on my airport)
    * Connection settings Configuration: DHCPWhere is this? I've never seen it. :-)
    I just use sys-unconfig and select DHCP and off it goes.
    alan

  • Solaris Express Developer Edition on Acer Aspire 9100

    I did some research and it appears that the latest edition or Solaris Express will install and work on the Acer Aspire 9100. It is a turion with a nvidia chipset, atheros wireless and an nvidia 6100 graphics chip set. Does anyone have experience with this install.

    Re research: You have tested Your hardware with Hardware_Detection_Tool? It seems to be more up to date than Install_Check. Install (or use already installed version) Windows, download this small tool and run it on-line (Internet connectionis necessary). Latest nevada version fills many gaps in previous releases.
    Good luck!

Maybe you are looking for