Solaris 10 x86/x64 on NVidia ION

Hello guys,
is it possible to install Solaris 10 x86/x64 on the NVidia ION-Platform? Are there any successful installations? For me it is important to know about the Point-of-view ION/330. This board I think is for a little home server a great performance/watt - system under 50W total power consumtion.
I hope anybody can help me.

Hi,
I was successfully installed Solaris 10 on NVidia, and no troubles yet. But make sure to install latest version of Solaris i.e "Solaris 10 5/09", it'll install all drivers for Nvidia mother board by default. Otherwise you would have to face some problems to get the desktop.
Thanks

Similar Messages

How about gccfss for Solaris x86/x64 platforms?

Subject says it all... it could make compiling a lot of code out there a whole lot easier!
Bob

I also desire gccfss for Solaris x86/x64 platforms .
In the interim I have downloaded the source and am attempting to create such a beast.
It is slow progress to fix the unexpected script breakage, but it seems to be going OK:
Problems:
1.): Issues like "-mtune=v9" and an "embeded spec" in gcc and cpp (from files
gccfss_src/build/gcc/gccspec.o and gccfss_src/build/gcc/cppspec.o).
2.): Use of OPTTABLE_H = $(srcdir)/config/target-option-table.h with SPARC specific
options throughout
EG:
#ifdef CROSS_COMPILE
#define NATIVE \
{ "-native", "-xtarget=generic" }, \
{ "-xarch=native64", "-Zarch=v9 -Zarchm64=v9 -Zm=64" },\
{ "-xarch=native", "-Zarch=v8plus -Zarchm32=v8plus -Zarchm64=v9 -Zm=32" },\
{ "-xtarget=native64", "-Zarch=generic -Zarchm32=generic -Zarchm64=v9 -xchip=generic -xcache=generic -Zm=64"}, \
{ "-xtarget=native", "-Zarch=generic -Zarchm32=generic -Zarchm64=v9 -xchip=generic -xcache=generic -Zm=32"}
#else
#define NATIVE \
{ "-native", "-xtarget=native" }, \
{ "-xarch=native64", "-xarch=native64 -Zm=64"}, \
{ "-xarch=native", "-xarch=native -Zm=32"}, \
{ "-xtarget=native64", "-xtarget=native64 -Zm=64"}, \
{ "-xtarget=native", "-xtarget=native -Zm=32"}
#endif
Thus, one would need to change:
{ "-xarch=native64", "-Zarch=v9 -Zarchm64=v9 -Zm=64" },\
to something like:
{ "-xarch=native64", "-xarch=386 -m64" },\
3.): Copy the "sparc_output_scratch_registers()" function from file
"gccfss_src/src/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.c" to "gccfss_src/src/gcc/tree-ir.c".
4.): Use the undocumented command line option "-frtl-backend" when this error
occurs during the build (a simple Makefile change):
`-mcpu=' is deprecated. Use `-mtune=' or '-march=' instead.
xgcc: SUNW0scgfss 4.2.0 has not been installed. Either install it or use -frtl-backend.
5.): More ...
All these issues occur because the scripts expect "--build=sparc-pc-solaris2.11" but
I configured using "--build=i386-pc-solaris2.11" . It seems like it is going to work
but I am yet to finish stage1 of the build (I do have a working "xgcc").
Rob

Instant Client 11.1.0.7 for Sun Solaris x86/x64

Hi,
we are looking for a new version(11.1.0.7) of instantclient for a Solaris 10 x86/x64 system.
Current Solaris instant client is outdated at the moment and we are have some problem with InstantClient 10 and the limitation(32k) of chars.
When will there be updated packages for Solaris on x86/x64 systems,
or is this platform not supported anymore?
Thanks a lot
Stephan

user10858876 wrote:
When will there be updated packages for Solaris on x86/x64 systems,
or is this platform not supported anymore?Good question, and one we would like to know.
Due to Oracle's redicoulus NDA for new release versions no one within Oracle seems to be able to tell us, which as a customer we find unresonable. We were told last year, about this time that we should expect a 11gR1 release around Oracleworld. That came and went. Again we asked, and were told that it "might" be comming out as a 11gR2 version.
Fine. We will renew our support agreement when we know you will support our platform.
Bryan

JRock Kit for Solaris 10 x86/x64

Hi,
Why don't exist a Jrock Kit distribution for
Solaris 10 x86/x64?
I have Bea 8.1, 9.2 for Solaris 10
x86/x64 and now Oracle 10g Rel 2 and I don't understand why
BEA don't release it.
Thanx
Giancarlo

Porting JRockit to new OSes/architectures is very expensive, so we have to prioritize the porting effort based on customer interest, and there has been very little demand for JRockit on Solaris/x86. Most customers purchasing Sun x86 hardware use Windows or Linux.
Regards,
Henrik StÃ¥hl
Product Manager, JRockit

Adobe Reader for x86/x64 Solaris

What is the idea behind this? Why don't we have a version for Intel processors? Can Adobe answer?

Yes, we have the v4 release, but, well, it pretty much sucks. I did send a message to a person at Adobe who replied that
Contrary to what people presume, coming out with a huge product like a Reader on an additional platform, isn't simply a re-compile. There are various 3rd party components that the Reader ships with (internal and external) and the team needs to evaluate what the schedule for these dependencies would have, also there's a ton of extra testing involved the moment we add an additional platform. Also, there's market viability, where we look at the numbers or the traction a platform is getting before we take a decision.
It's not clear to me that if they have versions for both Linux/x86 and Solaris/SPARC that creating a version for Solaris/x86 should be all that difficult. I can't think of where they would have library problems. I do understand the testing point. Testing GUI-based programs is a human-intensive undertaking. I don't understand how "market viability" for Solaris/SPARC could be better than Solaris/x86 at this point.
He also included a pointer to the Adobe 8.1.1 FAQ: http://blogs.adobe.com/acroread/2007/09/adobe_reader_811_faqs.html
Skip

Xorg.conf nVidia ION resolution

Sorry for my English.
I have this board: ASUS AT5IONT-I, Atom D525, ION2, PCI-E 4X, 2xDDR3 SODIMM, Gbit LAN,E-sata, USB3.0, DVI, HDMI, Fanless, Heatpipe, Mini-ITX.
And, trying to make HTPC.
I install Arch with openbox, but the problem is with video resolution.
I use my 32PFL9606H Philips TV 32''.
I set proper 1920x1080 resolution is xorg.conf but "xdpyinfo | grep dimensions" reports: "dimensions: 1280x800 pixels (338x211 millimeters)"
here is my xorg.conf:
# nvidia-settings: X configuration file generated by nvidia-settings
# nvidia-settings: version 275.09.07 ([email protected]) Wed Jun 8 16:05:05 PDT 2011
# nvidia-xconfig: X configuration file generated by nvidia-xconfig
# nvidia-xconfig: version 275.09.07 ([email protected]) Wed Jun 8 16:05:17 PDT 2011
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "Layout0"
Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0
InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer"
Option "Xinerama" "0"
EndSection
Section "Files"
EndSection
Section "InputDevice"
# generated from default
Identifier "Mouse0"
Driver "mouse"
Option "Protocol" "auto"
Option "Device" "/dev/psaux"
Option "Emulate3Buttons" "no"
Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"
EndSection
Section "InputDevice"
# generated from default
Identifier "Keyboard0"
Driver "kbd"
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Monitor0"
VendorName "Unknown"
ModelName "Philips FTV"
HorizSync 50.0 - 60.0
VertRefresh 50.0
Option "ExactModeTimingsDVI" "true"
Option "UseEDID" "false"
Option "DPMS"
Option "ModeDebug" "true"
ModeLine "1920x1080@50p" 148.500 1920 2448 2492 2640 1080 1084 1089 1125 +hsync +vsync
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "Device0"
Driver "nvidia"
VendorName "NVIDIA Corporation"
BoardName "ION"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Screen0"
Device "Device0"
Monitor "Monitor0"
DefaultDepth 24
Option "TwinView" "0"
SubSection "Display"
Modes "1920x1080@50p"
Depth 24
EndSubSection
EndSection
PS: I deleted /var/log/Xorg.0.log file, but after reboot it is not recreated. Why? And remember that it said something like:
"[ 185.106] (==) NVIDIA(0): No modes were requested; the default mode "nvidia-auto-select"
[ 185.106] (==) NVIDIA(0): will be used as the requested mode.
although I was set mode to 1920x1080
Last edited by clovenhoof (2011-07-02 09:30:37)

Hi !
Please don't use xorg.conf, edit the files inside /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ instead.
I also have an ION board and have working HDMI connection with audio at 1920x1080 using the below configuration. Remove your xorg.conf and then edit these files:
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-monitor.conf
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Monitor0"
Option "ExactModeTimingsDVI" "True"
HorizSync 14-70
VertRefresh 48-62
Modeline "1920x1080-TV" 148.35 1920 2008 2152 2300 1080 1084 1089 1125
Option "DPMS"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Default Screen"
Monitor "Monitor0"
Device "Default nvidia Device"
SubSection "Display"
Depth 24
Modes "1920x1080-TV"
EndSubSection
EndSection
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-nvidia.conf
Section "Device"
Identifier "Default nvidia Device"
Driver "nvidia"
Option "NoLogo" "True"
Option "ModeValidation" "NoEdidModes"
Option "UseEdidDpi" "False"
Option "DPI" "100 x 100"
EndSection
Please note that the above Modeline works on my TV (a 22'' low cost brand one) but I cannot guarantee it will work on yours.
Try that first, then if it doesn't work, try to generate one using the cvt command, and replace the Modeline:
cvt 1920 1080
it should output something like this:
# 1920x1080 59.96 Hz (CVT 2.07M9) hsync: 67.16 kHz; pclk: 173.00 MHz
Modeline "1920x1080_60.00" 173.00 1920 2048 2248 2576 1080 1083 1088 1120 -hsync +vsync
If this method doesn't work either, try the method explained here (which is the one I've first used to find the right Modeline). Its tricky method, and requires a bit of work and lot of patience ... just don't give up
Finally, a little bonus . To have working HDMI sound, I have to put these lines in /etc/asound.conf:
/etc/asound.conf
pcm.!default {
type hw
card 0
device 3
Again, you may need to change the device index in your case. You can list alsa devices using aplay -l command:
**** List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices ****
card 0: NVidia [HDA NVidia], device 0: VT1708S Analog [VT1708S Analog]
Subdevices: 2/2
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
Subdevice #1: subdevice #1
card 0: NVidia [HDA NVidia], device 1: VT1708S Digital [VT1708S Digital]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
card 0: NVidia [HDA NVidia], device 3: HDMI 0 [HDMI 0]
Subdevices: 0/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0

Core 2 Duo and solaris x86 11/06 works for me

This is FYI, since I seen (and posted) problems, but I haven't seen the solution posted.
I have successfully gotten solaris x86 11/06 to install and run on my core 2 duo machine. I had tried solaris x86 06/06, but I could only run in 32bit mode until patch 118855-19 was installed. It looks like 118855-33 is the baseline for 11/06.
With 06/06 I had to edit the grub command and add " kernel/unix" to the end of the 2nd line. This would force 32 bit mode rather than 64 bit. If I tried 64 bit, it would enter an endless reboot cycle. Once I installed the patch to 118855-19 I could run solaris 10 06/06 in 64 bit mode without issue.
Again, since solaris 10 11/06 is at 118855-33, it runs on my core2 machine straight from the install.
Hope this helps

On a laptop there is little point with running a 64-bit operating system unless it physically has more than 4gb of ram, or if you are processing datasets exceeding 4GB of ram. Unless you're into assembly or use Solaris for some reason to manipulate media, little is to be gained by using 64-bit versions if anything. The increased pointer, integer, and padding causes more memory to use for the same software, most software on 64-bit operating systems runs in 32-bit mode because there is no need to have 16 exabyte memory addressing capability for anything but media encoders, giant databases, or extremely bloated single-threaded software. Sun Java Creator takes a heck of a lot of ram, but even at peak it's still under 4GB. If you move files bigger than 4GB, the ability to memory map all 4096MB might have less overhead on a 64-bit operating system, but generally from an end-user perspective, especially on a fast Intel or Opteron system, you won't notice the difference much. Solaris is bi-arch, a large chunk of Windows Vista and XP x64 is bi-arch, and most of FreeBSD and Linux are bi-arch in 64-bit versions, as I said, no point in making everything 64-bit. 64-bit device drivers is an issue for every OS, you should stick with 32-bit on a laptop, and hold off on desktops unless you need extended assembly registers available only in 64-bit mode.

Can't see Solaris X86/SPARC Agents for 12c

I've ran the manual updates and automatic updates and the only agents i can see in the repository are still the linux x86 and X64 agents. Is there any way to manually load the agent to the repository so we can start testing the deployment?
I see the sparc/x86 agents are available for manual download on OTN

Go to Setup > Extensibility > Self Update. From the Self Update page, look in the Agent Software folder, you should see information showing that agents for Solaris x86 (64-bit) and Solaris Sparc (64bit) are available.
If necessary, see the following doc for information on using Self Update:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E24628_01/doc.121/e24473/self_update.htm#CACCIFBF
Regards,

ETA for Solaris x86-64 11g(R2)?

Does anyone have a contact that has any knowledge of what platforms are truly being supported for the 11gR2 release?
I'm having great difficulty getting an answer for Solaris x86-64 from our Oracle reps.
Thanks,
Bryan

hamcdc wrote:
For (as long as I can remember) Oracle releases have toggled in terms of "platform priority" between
depending on the mood of the day...Solaris x86 doesn't strike me as particularly strategic from Oracle's perspectiveAnd that's fine Connor. We are running "big iron" (16 cores on one of the servers should qualify), although now in the x64 format instead of the overpriced Sparc versions we have phased out, after being told by Oracle that the planned to support the platform going forward.
However, either Oracle is going to support this platform, as metalink shows but on which they have not delivered, or not. If they are dropping it, other than support what exists, we won't be happy, but at least we can make plans for the future. This is all we have:
bq. Certify - Additional Info Oracle Database - Enterprise Edition Version 11gR1 64-bit On Sun Solaris x86-64 (64-bit) \\ Operating System: Sun Solaris x86-64 (64-bit) Version 10 \\ Oracle Database - Enterprise Edition Version 11gR1 64-bit \\ N/A Version N/A \\ Status: Projected \\ Product Version Note: \\ None available for this product. \\ Certification Note: \\ Schedule to be announced. \\ NOTE: This is the most current and accurate information. Do not log Service Requests to Support for additional information. When the date is known this note will be updated. \\ Certify Administrator - 2008
They owe us, the customers an honest answer and timeframe. I think we've been more than patient.
Bryan

Mounting a Solaris x86 CD/DVD from a remote Windows CD/DVD-ROM drive

Greetings, all.
Is it possible to mount a remote Windows CD/DVD-ROM drive? I have the Solaris 10x86 Companion Software DVD sitting in a CD/DVD-ROM drive that's installed on a Windows server on my network. It is shared-out (F:) and the two servers can ping each other. I've also confirmed the NFS services/daemons are running on the Solaris x86 machine. I've tried the following variations but, all have failed to produce successful results:
# mount -F nfs x.x.x.x:/f /mnt
nfs mount: x.x.x.x: : RPC: Program not registered
nfs mount: retrying: /mnt
# mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/f /mnt
mount: No such device
mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/f
# mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/F /mnt
mount: No such device
mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/F
[FYI: S10_106_SOFTWARE is the DVD's label as reported by Windows Explorer.]
# mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/S10_106_SOFTWARE /mnt
mount: No such device
mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/S10_106_SOFTWARE
# mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/s10_106_software /mnt
mount: No such device
mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/s10_106_software
# mount -F nfs x.x.x.x:/S10_106_SOFTWARE /mnt
nfs mount: x.x.x.x: : RPC: Program not registered
nfs mount: retrying: /mnt
# mount -F nfs x.x.x.x:/s10_106_software /mnt
nfs mount: x.x.x.x: : RPC: Program not registered
nfs mount: retrying: /mnt
# mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/f/s10_106_software /mnt
mount: No such device
mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/f/s10_106_software
# mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/F/s10_106_software /mnt
mount: No such device
mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/F/s10_106_software
# mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/f/S10_106_SOFTWARE /mnt
mount: No such device
mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/f/S10_106_SOFTWARE
# mount -F hsfs x.x.x.x:/F/S10_106_SOFTWARE /mnt
mount: No such device
mount: cannot mount x.x.x.x:/F/S10_106_SOFTWARE
I've also tried mounting it at bootup by adding the appropriate entry in the /etc/vfstab file but, this does not work as well. I've tried Google'ing for an answer to my issue but, I haven't been able to find anything that applies directly to what I'm reporting. It's usually chatter about mounting from one UNIX server to another. Any advice from the community would be greatly appreciated.

After three weeks, you deserve a reply. Windoze does
not natively support NFS.Also deserves a decent answer...
There are two ways to do this:
Install Microsoft's free "Windows Services for UNIX," which includes a Windows NFS server; or
Install the 'sharity' package (google for it); it provides Solaris systems the ability to mount Windows shares

Install oracle 8.1.7 on Solaris(x86) 10 b72

Has anyone Installed oracle 8.1.7 on Solaris(x86) 10 b72???
When I run runInstaller I have
135$ Initializing Java Virtual Machine from ../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/jre. Please wait...
ld.so.1: /ora_inst/stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/i386/native_threads/jre: fatal: relocation error: file /ora_inst/install/../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/../lib/i386/native_threads/libawt.so: symbol XShmQueryExtension: referenced symbol not found (/ora_inst/install/../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/../lib/i386/native_threads/libawt.so)
ld.so.1: /ora_inst/stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/i386/native_threads/jre: fatal: relocation error: file /ora_inst/install/../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/../lib/i386/native_threads/libawt.so: symbol XShmQueryExtension: referenced symbol not found (/ora_inst/install/../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.1.8.10/1/DataFiles/Expanded/jre/solaris/bin/../lib/i386/native_threads/libawt.so)
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:

try this:
LD_PRELOAD="libX11.so libXext.so" ; export LD_PRELOAD
./runInstaller

Oracle 8.1.5 Client/WLS/Solaris x86

has anyone been able to get Oracle's client 8.1.5 running on Solaris x86 in conjunction with WLS to talk to back-end Oracle? Any help would be greatly appreciated.thanks.

This will not work. We have not built the native libraries to work with
Solaris on Intel..
I suggest trying the platform independent type 4 JDBC driver available for
free from Oracle. It is supported (as is any JDBC driver) with WebLogic
Server. To download it:
Go to http://www.oracle.com and select the "Download" option.
From the resulting page, use the "Select Utility or Driver" dropdown to
select Oracle JDBC drivers
From the resulting page, scroll down a little (since SQLJ stuff appears at
the top).
Or, to go directly there:
http://technet.oracle.com/software/tech/java/sqlj_jdbc/software_index.htm
Thanks,
Michael
Michael Girdley
BEA Systems Inc
"Dean Davis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3a267487$[email protected]..
has anyone been able to get Oracle's client 8.1.5 running on Solaris x86in conjunction with WLS to talk to back-end Oracle? Any help would be
greatly appreciated.thanks.

Install error for Oracle 10g on Solaris x86 64-bit. NETCA won't run

Hi All,
I'm installing Oracle 10.2.0.1 on Solaris x86 64-bit. I run the Oracle installer and all runs well until the NETCA portion of the install. It then errors (error file below). When i attempt to run NETCA outside of the installer i'm getting the same error output. I have verified my OS version and that all dependent packages are installed. I'm not sure what is causing this. Any help would be greatly appriciated.
thanks, dave
ERROR FILE:
An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM.
Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0xFEEF24E8
Function=strchr+0x8
Library=/lib/libc.so.1
Current Java thread:
     at oracle.net.common.NetGetEnv.getDNSDomain(Native Method)
     at oracle.net.ca.ConfigureProfile.setDefaultProfileParams(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.ca.InitialSetup.setupConfigObjects(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.ca.InitialSetup.<init>(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.ca.NetCA.main(Unknown Source)
Dynamic libraries:
0x8050000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/bin/java
0xfefc0000      /lib/libthread.so.1
0xfefd0000      /lib/libdl.so.1
0xfeed0000      /lib/libc.so.1
0xfea00000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so
0xfee80000      /usr/lib/libCrun.so.1
0xfee50000      /lib/libsocket.so.1
0xfedc0000      /lib/libnsl.so.1
0xfeda0000      /lib/libm.so.1
0xfeeb0000      /usr/lib/libsched.so.1
0xfe9a0000      /lib/libm.so.2
0xfed50000      /lib/libscf.so.1
0xfe980000      /lib/libdoor.so.1
0xfe960000      /lib/libuutil.so.1
0xfe940000      /lib/libmd5.so.1
0xfe920000      /lib/libmp.so.2
0xfe8e0000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/native_threads/libhpi.so
0xfe890000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libverify.so
0xfe850000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so
0xfe830000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libzip.so
0xf1a00000      /usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8.so.3
0xfc780000      /usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/methods_en_US.UTF-8.so.3
0xf13c0000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libawt.so
0xf0f90000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libmlib_image.so
0xf0f30000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/motif21/libmawt.so
0xf0d50000      /usr/dt/lib/libXm.so.4
0xf0cf0000      /usr/openwin/lib/libXt.so.4
0xf0cc0000      /usr/openwin/lib/libXext.so.0
0xf1890000      /usr/openwin/lib/libXtst.so.1
0xf0c30000      /usr/openwin/lib/libX11.so.4
0xf0be0000      /usr/openwin/lib/libdps.so.5
0xf0a90000      /usr/openwin/lib/libSM.so.6
0xf0a70000      /usr/openwin/lib/libICE.so.6
0xf0a30000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libnjni10.so
0xefe00000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libclntsh.so.10.1
0xefc60000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libnnz10.so
0xf0a10000      /lib/libkstat.so.1
0xefc40000      /lib/libgen.so.1
0xefc20000      /lib/librt.so.1
0xefbf0000      /lib/libaio.so.1
0xefbd0000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libldapjclnt10.so
Heap at VM Abort:
Heap
def new generation total 576K, used 343K [0xf1e00000, 0xf1ea0000, 0xf22e0000)
eden space 512K, 55% used [0xf1e00000, 0xf1e467f8, 0xf1e80000)
from space 64K, 96% used [0xf1e80000, 0xf1e8f798, 0xf1e90000)
to space 64K, 0% used [0xf1e90000, 0xf1e90000, 0xf1ea0000)
tenured generation total 1408K, used 338K [0xf22e0000, 0xf2440000, 0xf5e00000)
the space 1408K, 24% used [0xf22e0000, 0xf2334ab8, 0xf2334c00, 0xf2440000)
compacting perm gen total 4096K, used 3580K [0xf5e00000, 0xf6200000, 0xf9e00000)
the space 4096K, 87% used [0xf5e00000, 0xf617f170, 0xf617f200, 0xf6200000)
Local Time = Tue Aug 29 13:49:22 2006
Elapsed Time = 225
# The exception above was detected in native code outside the VM
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2_05-b04 mixed mode)
#

I have the same problem on Linux Debian 3.0.
My /etc/hosts looks like:
127.0.0.1     localhost.localdomain     localhost
#192.168.100.1     bt.lan.home     bt
#192.168.100.5     jacek.lan.home     jacek
# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
::1     ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix
ff02::1 ip6-allnodes
ff02::2 ip6-allrouters
ff02::3 ip6-allhostsPlease help.

How to upgrade oracle 32 to 64 bit on sun solaris x86 64 bit OS?

Hi,
I want to upgrade/convert 32 bit Oracle Database 10.2.0.2 to 64 bit database. Existing 32 bit database is RAC and it is running on Sun Solaris X86 64 bit OS.
First, I want to know is it possible?
If yes, then what are the exact steps?

Hi,
Such a migration can be done, just follow the steps in Metalink note 62290.1
It is important to remember that 64-bit database requires more shared pool memory so you should increase your shared pool size.
Liron Amitzi
Senior DBA consultant
[www.dbsnaps.com]
[www.orbiumsoftware.com]
Edited by: Liron Amitzi on Jul 1, 2009 3:08 PM

How to integrate a Solaris x86 server on Sun Management Center ?

Hello people,
I want to integrate a Solaris x86 server on Sun Management Center platform.
If I'm not wrong, SunMC doesn't run for Solaris x86, server and client only as console with Java.
In speat of it, I try to install Sun Management Center 3.0 Agent for Solaris x86.
It seems to be ok, install packages, but when execute es-setup script, intents to create the following directory:
/opt/SUNWsymon/base/bin/sparc-sun-solaris2.8
I supose that in this directory, SunMC will install sparc binary files
At this point, I can't follow the installation and abort it.
Can anybody give me ideas to install and integrate my solaris x86 server on SunMC ?
Thanks

Hi Hisham,
hishooooo wrote:
Dear Gents,
I have one X86 Solaris Server configured and installed to be Sun Management Center Server.
successfully i could monitor the Sun Solaris Servers after i have installed the SMC agent on them.
my problem is that i could not install the SMC agent on Red Hat Linux. as i could not find an easy document or steps to do so.
could you guide please?If you still have a copy of your SunMC media around, the same ["es-inst"|http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-2215/command-line-1?l=en&a=view] program you use to install Solaris Agents should work on Linux as well. It autodetects OS type and will install Solaris packages or RPMs as appropriate.
Regards,
[email protected]
http://www.HalcyonInc.com

Solaris 10 x86/x64 on NVidia ION

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for