Soundsticks and Intel mac 24"

Hi, first of all I own the first issue soundsticks and iSub. I now understand there is a soundsticks II. First question, what is the difference? Assuming I have a reply to the first question, I've heard that soundsticks II do not work with the new intel macswhich i just purchased. But, do the original sticks work? I've heard it was a driver issue, and HK told me it was a mac issue. Any help appreciated. Does not seem fair to pay 200 bucks for speakers that are now obsolete over a driver issue.
Thanks
M

You may be interested in the following (emphasis mine):
Mac OS X 10.4 Help
My iSub isn't working
If your iSub subwoofer isn't working, make sure it's plugged into a USB port on your computer and into a working power outlet. If you still can't hear any sound through your iSub, you should check your system sound settings.
Note: If you are using an Intel-based computer, an iSub will only work when USB speakers or a USB audio interface device are connected to the computer and selected as the default output device in Sound preferences.
To check your system sound settings:
1. Choose Apple menu > System Preferences, click Sound.
2. Click Output, and then make sure:
3. The “iSub volume” slider is not all the way to the left.
4. The iSub Mute checkbox is not selected.
5. The “Output volume” slider is not all the way to the left.
6. The Mute checkbox is not selected.

Similar Messages

Universal CINs? (For MacOS 10.4 and Intel Macs)

Hi!
1. I was wondering if it was possible to build a Universal CIN for MacOS 10.4, in order to support Intel Macs. If so how? I get link errors in Xcode because it cannot find CIN functions such as MoveBlock, and NumericArrayResize when compiling for i386 (which is understandable). Is there an Intel Mac version of liblabviewcin.a and liblvexports.a?
2. Is it possible for LabVIEW to call a DLL function in a Universal framework? Or must all frameworks be for the PowerPC?
Thanks.

I am trying to invoke code external to LabVIEW that contain AltiVec and in the future, SSE instructions. Right now I am trying to bundle PowerPC code (with AltiVec instructions) with Intel i386 code to support both PowerPC and Intel Macs using a single binary.
So basically I have:
1. A CIN that uses AltiVec currently (which includes AltiVec instructions). I would prefer that it switched to a SSE version automatically when I call the CIN on an Intel Mac.
2. Some VIs that uses the Call Library Function Node to invoke a function in a Universal Framework. The framework is compiled for both PowerPC and Intel. The PowerPC version includes AltiVec instructions and thus is incompatible with Rosetta. I was wondering if LabVIEW would actually be able to invoke such a function successfully on an Intel Mac. I don't have an Intel Mac on hand, which is why I am asking.
PS: The original post was posted using NI JT's account accidentally. The question is actually mine.

NikonScan v4 and Intel Mac

I'm looking for people that can verify if NikonScan version 4, a Nikon Scanner, and an Intel Mac can play nice together.
Nikon says Intel Core Duo Macs are unsupported. What about the Core Solo? It's not mentioned. That doesn't mean it won't work on an Intel Duo or Solo and I'm just looking for verification either way from people that have actually tried it.
Nikon's Official Answer-
http://support.nikontech.com/cgi-bin/nikonusa.cfg/php/enduser/stdadp.php?p_faqid=13865&pcreated=1139239488
Currently Nikon products and software applications are not supported on Macintosh computers powered by the Intel Core Duo processor. Compatibility and support for Nikon products and software with Macintosh computers powered by the Intel Core Duo processor is currently under review by the Nikon Quality department. At this time we do not have any time-tables regarding when we will or if we will issue drivers and software support for this new system. Rest assured that Nikon will make every effort to support all the latest technologies developed by Apple and Microsoft. Keep checking our Knowledge Database system for updates regarding this issue over the upcoming months.
Someone in another Apple thread claims he uses NikonScan v3.0 on an Intel Mac. ->
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=331630
Here's a link to download NikonScan version 4.0 ->
http://www.nikonusa.com/software/qw400/NS4.sit
THANK-YOU!
(2) B & W G3/500 & Gigabit G4/1.6 Ghz Dual Mac OS X (10.4.6)

I answered this one myself.
Yes, a Nikon LS-5000ED scanner with the USB 2.0 interface works with an Intel Duo Core 1.66 Ghz Mac Mini - 512 MB RAM.
Using the latest NikonScan 4.02 software and OS X.4.6 with all the updates.
No problems yet.
Hopefully the Universal Binary version of NikonScan will be available soon as I think it could run faster. Especially after Apple stops making the PPC models later this year.

Flash and Intel Macs

Hi there everyone,
I've got a site that has a flash game in which users need to answer math questions by typing in numbers and hitting enter. I recently heard from a user who just switched from a PC to an Intel Mac. The game worked fine on the PC, but now, when he's playing the game, it won't register him typing in the numbers. The keyboard works fine all other times he clicks the numbers, just not in the game.
I figure this is a flash plugin problem, but I figured I'd check here and see if anyone's heard of any general Flash + Intel Mac issues like this.
Thanks,
Dan P.

Nevermind... it's appartenly working on user's computer. Sorry for the forum clutter.

Difference in file handling on PowerPC macs and Intel macs

I have a Power PC mac at work and an intel mac at home. I've noticed that there is a difference in file handling between the two.
I cant pinpoint exactly what it is but has anyone else found this?

If your question is: Why is my work computer, which is over 7 years old, runs an old version of OS X (maybe leopard, maybe Tiger), with a now abandoned CPU architecture (PowerPC) different than my modern Mac Mini at home which runs Mountain Lion on an Intel CPU? Then my answer would be:
Your work computer is over 7 years old.
It runs an very old version of OS X, which is NOT Mountain Lion.
It runs on a CPU known as PowerPC, which is not been used by Apple since 2006.
Your home computer is more modern.
It runs OS X Mountain Lion 10.8.2.
It runs on an Intel CPU.
I can't pinpoint exactly what your question is, but I suspect that this information may help you answer it or in the alternative, ask it differently.

ARD, Leopard and Intel Macs

I can't get ARD to load on my intel mac. Works fine on a power pc mac but not on an intel. I am using the latest version of ARD. Is anyone using ARD with an intel Mac?

Many people are.
Did you migrate your ARD install from a PPC machine to the Intel machine? This is known to cause problems. Your best bet is to remove all of the various plist files and, effectively, start clean.

Cisco VPN 4.7 and Intel Mac

Has anyone been able to get the Cisco VPN 4.7 or 4.8 work with the Intel version of Mac OS X 10.4.4? It gives an error that the subsystem is not running.

Very true - but I am actually using 4.9.0030 beta (from TAC), and have been for about a week now - and it indeed works (on Intel Mac, and a PowerMac G5 Dual).
There is some issue with profiles (imported profile files as well as old ones / certs), but all in all, it does function.
I do remember the long road to a REALLY functioning Tiger client, and it APPEARS Cisco are going to be a bit better off with this one
Having said that, I DO agree with your statement nonetheless I don't work for them !!!
Dan

La cie firewire and intel mac

I have an intel mac and a la cie250 d2 extreme triple harddrive. I connected the la cie to a power pc imac and all is well. Is the la cie compatible with the intel imac? Can I connect it, format and start using the la cie or are there software updates to download? I will not use silverlining pro or silverkeeper software.
When I connected a digital slr and a dv camera to the ppc mac, they worked fine. no software to install. I think connecting the la cie should be the same.

You should have no trouble with your LaCie drive working with you iMac Core Duo. Before moving to a FireWire hard drive from OWC, I had the same LaCie hard drive, and it worked just fine, without any updates.
Joe

Realplayer and Intel Mac - anyone got to the bottom of it yet?

I think I understand the Real website to say that current realplayer works on Intel Mac, whereas I believe previous download would not.
I have downloaded and it runs but no sound.
I have set Audio Input in Audio/MIDI to 44100 (this correct? Under Audio Output it says "Output not supported, not sure what that refers to).
I have opened and closed Garage Band.
I have used Get Info to get Realplayer to run in Rosetta.
Anyone know what I need to do to get sound from this thing?
Worminger

See my separate posting on this

MS UAM and Intel Macs?

Has anyone noticed that the MS UAM for AFP is not working on Intel Macs? I have installed it on two MacTel boxes, one MacBook and one Mac Pro. It doesn't work on either. The G4 I installed it on does work.
Any ideas?

Answer is here:
http://www.macwindows.com/intelmac.html#3

HDV and Intel Macs

So, many have some trouble viewing HDV. And when it works (by opening Quicktime Player under Rosetta), my older G4 does far better with smoother video than my new MacBook.
Can anyone confirm my suspicion: the HDV codec is not Universal? I am not talking about the Intermediate Codec; I'm not trying to convert it.
If so, when and how would we find an update?
Thanks.
Jeremy

The HDV codec only seems to be available with Final Cut Pro (or Studio), and there is a Universal update for that. As far as I can tell that's the only way to get the Universal HDV component.
It also seems that running QuickTime Player under Rosetta, with the PPC HDV component does not let you view HDV movies on an Intel Mac. I'd be happy to hear how you managed it if you've found otherwise!

Waveburner and Intel Macs

Does the crossgrade to Logic Pro 7.2 also include a version of Waveburner that runs properly on Intel Macs?
Sorry if this is answered elsewhere but I did look around and couldn't find anything.
Stuart

SS, hi.
Bronze Welder by minnetonka software will do DVD-A.
very basic. nothing like the features you'd see on any DVD movie.
they make more advanced types - windows only - that will let you add graphics, movies, etc, but are priced in the $us1000's.
i don't think the major record labels want us folks to have this type of software cheap as they don't even use DVD-A yet.
doing albums with this quality would certainly stop a lot of the over- compressed, over-mastered stuff out there now on cd. people would have a better musical experience for sure.
re: WB. i'm still on a PPC and it does crash sometimes. try putting all the songs for a given cd into one folder on a separate HDD. i find my crashes occur when the files are all over the place.

FCP and Intel Macs no go?

For all who are asking whether rosetta will enable current versions of FCP to run on the new intel macs take a look at this article (near the bottom of the page)
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1910879,00.asp

Read this:
http://www.apple.com/finalcutstudio/topquestions.html
"Does Final Cut Studio run on the new Intel-based Mac computers?
The current version of Final Cut Studio is not supported on Intel-based Mac computers with Rosetta. A Universal version of Final Cut Studio will be available before the end of March 2006. Universal applications are designed to run flawlessly on both Intel- and PowerPC-based Mac computers.
If I buy Final Cut Studio today, can I get the Universal version when it’s available?
Yes. All owners of Final Cut Studio are eligible for a low-cost “crossgrade” to the Universal version for $49."

Would my plug-ins work in Logic 7.2 and intel mac?

This may be a dumb question but would my plug-ins that work in Logic 7.1 on my Powerbook work in Logic 7.2 on an intel mac?

The statement I made is not a "blanket" one, if one is looking at the big picture.
I understand why you would consider that a blanket statement, since you are narrowly looking only at one angle.
The user did not state that this is the only reason he is getting a computer, and he did not specify that he is using the computer ONLY for Logic, and therefore, it is wise to consider all options.
In what way was my comment narrow?
Everyone's situation is different depending on what software, plugins and peripherals are used. Making a recommendation based on months makes no sense since someone's software may be ready much sooner than that, or may be available even later.
The decision to upgrade should be based on whether the things you need to run are ready or not. Doing it this way considers all options, picking a number of months out of a hat is narrowly looking at one angle.

GUID or APM for PPC and Intel Macs

Apple Article 306932 states
Click the Options button.
Select a new partition scheme:
Use "Apple Partition Map" partition scheme if the disk will be used with Time Machine and a PowerPC-based Mac.
Use "GUID" partition scheme if the disk will be used with Time Machine and a Intel-based Mac.
So, I have a PB G4 (PPC) and a Mac Book Pro (Intel), both of which I want to use with TM to one external drive.
So, which partition scheme should I use?

I suggest that you take a look at the following links as they may provide you with an answer :
http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=2006061610374449&query=apm%2Bguid
http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20060322054212363
http://rentzsch.com/tidbits/intelbasedMacBootIncompatibility

Soundsticks and Intel mac 24"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for