Source system deletion before copy or refresh of Non productive system

Hi
regarding the refresh of non prod BI system. . As part of refresh, we were asked to follow note 886102.
In this Scenario B3 matches to us. While doing the scond step. I have to delete source systems from RSA1 except my self system.
It is taking long time to delete source systems as each object of source system is prompting for request and consuming long time to complete thsi activity.
Please help me with a smarter method to delete the sourcesystems.
Thanks,
Haaris
Edited by: Hari Prasad Bolla on Jul 14, 2010 8:50 PM

Hi:
The primary source of information is the how to paper on this topic:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/bff13df2-0c01-0010-6ba7-bc50346a6fd8
YOu are correct, you can refreh the BI system without deleting the source system.
Thanks for any points you assign (after all, I wrote the paper!).
Best Regards -
Ron Silberstein
SAP

Similar Messages

Technical Monitoring one template used for production and non-production system.

Dear All,
Is there a way to have one template in Solman Technical Monitoring for production system and non-production system with different alerts ? For example if it exceeds a threshold for production system it will trigger red alert or set automatically an incident and if it's non prod system it will go to yellow warning alert ?
Regards
Lukasz Goral

Hi Likasz,
You first create and customize the template, and then assign to a system.
If it was selecting a system and then customizing a template, then may be such functionality makes sense.
So, I don't think that is possible.
Better would be copy the template used for production to non-production and make the adjustment to it.
Regards,
Divyanshu

SAP_ALL in non-productive systems

Hello SAP Security Administrators,
I have been searching (without success) for documentation or posts for a SAP security best practice for who should or should not have the profile SAP_ALL in a non-productive system. Is this typically left up to the individual company security policies? Is it a given that Basis will have SAP_ALL for administrative support? Are Security Admins allowed to have elevated privs in a non-productive system for research and troubleshooting?
We are trying to establish a standard for non-productive systems, so any input would be greatly appreciated!
Regards,
Janice

I do not think there are real standards. Personally I consider using SAP_ALL a sign of utter lazyness because there is never a person who needs to access all functionallity in an ERP system.
The only valid occasions I know to use SAP_ALL is during upgrades but even then it's not a guarantee against surprises.
You are talking about non productive systems but that does not exclude systems with production data, something to consider.
Some thoughts:
Do you want people to influence developments and/or transports if that is not their task?
Do you want pepole to see sensitive testdata just copied from production?
Do you really think your system/landscape configuration will be safe if you have to rely on agreements? Transport routes for instance?
SAP_ALL is something I only allow in sandbox systems and only if they're being backupped at least weekly. That is to avoid heavy discussions when people destroy each others work by curiously hitting buttons and 'trying' transactions.
I am sure some others will have a few suggestions to add

Setting client role in non-production systems

In our QA test systems of R/3 and BW, the client role in SCC4 was set to 'Production'. The reason I was given is that by setting the client role to 'Production', will enable some settings in FI such as period closing,and customizing settings remain open without transportable requests. I totally disagree with this. I worked on numerous projects, but this is first time I am hearing this. I always set client role to Test in non-production systems, without any problems. Do any one have any idea about this?
Thanks
Santosh

SAP have a concept of "current settings". These include things like exchange rates and other items which really appear to be configuration settings. In a non-modifiable system these cannot be changed because the transport management system tries to get involved. If the client is set to productive, this restriction is overridden.
I would always suggest that the QA system should be set to productive and non-modifiable to ensure that the behaviour of the transactions affecting such objects can be tested in a production-like environment. If you need to have your QA system open for any sort of changes you are exposed to having changes introduced in QA to leading to the impression that new/modified functionality or config works but when the transport takes the unmodified version to production you'll be in trouble.

EWA for non-productive Systems

Hi all,
is there a possibility to get Early Watch Alerts for Systems in a Solution, which are not marked as productive.
I don't want to create many solutions.
The same problem i have with the monitoring, I only see the productive in the monitoring overview.
Regards
Tobias

>
Schlosser Tobias wrote:
> I have added Systems to the Solution XY. The Leading Role of this solution is "productive Systems"
>
> I have add System PR1 (Productive) and System DE1 (Development). But I can only see the EWA for the Productive.
> If I want to see the EWA for the Development I have to delete the log. components and switch the leading role to "Development Systems".
>
> That's very inconvenient.
>
> I wan't one Solution with all my Systems, and EWAs for every System in it. Is this possible?
Yes, it's possible to have all systems (Prod, Dev, QA, ...) within one solution and to have EWA activated.
You need to choose "Put in Solution" from the context menu. See screen shots attached.
Regards,
Ruediger

Same EPM Excel Report takes time to open and refresh on 1 system while it opens and refreshes faster on other system

Hi All ,
I am facing an issue where the EPM Excel Templates on SERVER ROOT FOLDER take time to open on 1 system . It also takes great amount of time to REFRESH . While on an another system the same Report opens rather quickly and refreshes also quickly .
Regards,
SHUBHAM

Hi Shubham,
Now day excel problems are due to some MS update. Not sure but have a look at below note.
2107965 - Issues in EPM Add-in after installing Microsoft updates

The system executes DB6-specific jobs on a non-DB6 system.

Hi experts,
Our R3 system is ECC6 and is running on oracle.
The below background jobs are running in our system.
CCMS_COLL_DB:RSDBPREV
CCMS_COLL_DB:RSDB_DAILY
CCMS_COLL_DB:RSDB_PAR
CCMS_COLL_DB:RSDB_TDB
CCMS_COLL_DB:RSDB_WDB
As per note 1167933, These jobs are provided for the monitoring of DB6 systems in a heterogenous system landscape. They are also scheduled if there are no DB6 systems to be monitored.
Could anybody please confirm if I can go ahead and delete this jobs as they do not seem to required in sap system with oracle database?
Thanks and Regards,
Amit Jana.

Was this system migrated from DB6? Did you use SM36 - Default Jobs - to schedule them?
Markus

Solman 7.1 SP10 delete product system in SMSY

Hi,
Somehow in my Solman 7.1 sp10 a product system is in SMSY and not in LMDB but in this SP I´m unable to delete it using SMSY and as the product system is not in LMDB, I don´t find how to do it.
Anyone knows how to delete it.
Regards,

Hi Vevek,
If it's not associated with LMDB and the data source is SLD or TMS/RFC and the date and time stamp is out-dated, then you can delete the product system in SMSY by switching to Edit mode. If the data source is LMDB, then it needs to be done via LMDB. I hope that helps to address the issue. If not please open a message with SV-SMG-SYS.
Regards,
Jay Soma.

Java WAS System Copy for non-SR1 Systems

Hi,
I found the document describing the Java WAS system
copy for NW 2004SR1.
However, has anybody successfully copied a Java
WAS system (Especially if the SID was
changed) which was not SR1?
I understand how to copy the datafiles, recreate the
control files, adapt the default and instance
profiles, etc..
However, I am not sure which other parameters,
XML files, or database entries need to be changed.
This is for a development system (I wouldn't do this
for a production system).
Any information from somebody who succeeded to do
this would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
IF

Hi,
for system copy of SCM 4.0 use the document system copy for webas 6.20
https://websmp205.sap-ag.de/~sapdownload/011000358700002645032002E/syscopy620_140803.pdf
perform DB copy as note 151603 :Copying an SQL Server database (homogeneous system copy)
apply sap note 551915 - R/3 won't start after database restore or database copy after DB copy.
if you want to perform livecache copy also
check Note 457425 - Homogenous liveCache copy using backup/restore
also consider Note 886103 - System Landscape Copy for SAP SCM
regards,
kaushal

File Transfer from non-SAP System.

Hi Experts,
We have the requirement to copy/transfer file from non-SAP system to SAP system file server. Can we use these FMs FTP_CONNECT, FTP_COMMAND and FTP_DISCONNECT?
or can we also use SXPG_COMMAND_EXECUTE?
Thanks,
Edson

Hi Varma,
Thanks. I'm looking at the FTP_COMMAND FM. If I got it right the 'command' parameter here should be the OS level commands? Example would be cp <file path from source> <file folder of destination> for unix. ?
Thanks again,
Edson

Same logical system name for two productive systems - BW, PI issues

Dear all,
we have a productive system which serves two companies (different company codes). This system is connected both to BW and PI for both companies.
There is a requirement that these two companies must use their own system, so the whole landscape (dev,qa,prd) will be copied to different systems (different server with different system id).
As a result of the above procedure we wll have two different productive systems, as required, but we wll have the same logical system name for the two productive systems, which must be both connect to bw and PI.
However as far as I know:
- we cannot connect systems with same logical system name to BW,PI
- we cannot convert logical system name of the one of the two productive systems as they are productive and so this is not supported.
How can we overcome the problem?
Please advice.

> However as far as I know:
> - we cannot connect systems with same logical system name to BW,PI
> - we cannot convert logical system name of the one of the two productive systems as they are productive and so this is not supported.
Right.
> How can we overcome the problem?
Since you split up systems (or plan to) I highly recommend booking an SLO service (http://service.sap.com/slo). Those people have to the tools and the knowlege to help you. I would not do this on my own.
Markus

Query created in production system and object changeability

Hi,
The production BW has the object changeability for query elements set to 'Changeable original'. Some queries which have been created in this system can be changed, others, which have also been created in the system, can not.
All queries are assigned to the development packate $TMP. None of them have been transported anywhere, nor have they been created somewhere else and transported into the system.
The system is BW 3.5, SP 17.
Has anyone got any idea what the problem could be?
Best regards,
Rita

Hi,
The object changeability in the system is set to 'Changeable Original' and I know where to switch from 'not changeable' to 'changeable original' to 'everything changeable'.
The normal development cycle sees reports being created in the development system and then being transported through to the production system. Here, they should not be changeable. However, users with the relevant authorisation should be able to either -
- create new copies of these reports and change them or
- create new ad-hoc reports and also change these
We have several of these reports on the production system. The object changeability is set to 'changeable original', as I mentioned. I would expect that all queries which have been created on this system and never transported (either in or out of the system) should be changeable, based on this setting. However, some are, some ar not. The error message when trying to change the 'non-changeable' ones is 'Operation falied! No error message available from the server'. If I make a copy of one of these queries, hoping to save is as an ad-hoc query and change it, the error message is 'query could not be saved due to a problem in transport'.
How come some can be changed, others can't? Is there anywhere I can check what the difference is between the changeable and non-changeable reports which have been created on the system?
Best regards,
Rita

Infosource invisible in production system

Hello,
We are facing a unique problem that we are not able to find the Info source for a ODS and one Infocube in our Production system. In Quality system it was working fine and we could see these Infosources. But on transporting the complete devlopment to Production system , we could not locate the required Infosources.
As a matter of fact,these Infosources was available in the data flow for the Cube,
and we could go to the infosource by double clicking it in the dataflow. But the same was not visible in the Infosource tab in AWB in production system.
We tried various Options like:
1 RSA1 -> Infosource -> from MENU settings -> display generated objects -> and check the radio button show generated objects. Still the infosource was not visible.
Can anyone please provide some inputs to it.
Thanks,
Vipul

Hi Anil,
Yes, you are right; my Application component had not been transported to Production System.
My Infoareas are lying in unassigned nodes and so the info-objects.
But i dont able to understand why my application componet is not been transported to Production system. When it succesfully transported to Quality system where all things are working fine.
I have transported the same request to production system as well. Can you provide some insight to it.
And to other replies i can say that i cant replicate and activate Data Sources in Production system. I have already done these steps in Development system.
Thanks and regards.
Vipul

Setting up a Quality/Production System-- Pl suggest

Dera All,
We are on SRM 7.0 and ERP-EHP4. We have a development Server and have configured the SRM and ECC for the Extended Classic. What is the best approach to create a Quality/Production System?. I Have gone through the document System Transport and Copy too and have a couple of questions.
1. Do We need to perform a client copy with SAP_Cust from Development to Quality and Quality to Production? and then do the necessary settings for Product Categories/Products/Business Partners and Org Model Transport etc...?
2. Is System copy a good option?. ( The document suggests not to go for System Copy for setting up Quality/Production Systems from Development Server)
Pl suggest.
Thanks and Regards
velu

Dear All,
Any suggestions. Can you pl share how this is being handled in your current projects?.
Thanks in advance
regds
velu

0fiscyear shows differents results in test & production systems

I have a query on development system and production system. The query disaggregates an amount for the 12 months of the year. To do this, I use a manual input variable as a reference (0fiscper characteristic ) and use the offset to disaggregate 12 months. In development there is no problem, but in production I obtained like result from 4 to 16 period. The characteristic is transactionaly loaded and it's loading 12 periods of the year in the infoprovider. In the master data exist 16 periods per year in both systems. How could is possible that in production system this query is accessing to master data if both systems are equal?
Thanks and regards
Ricardo

Hi
Do you have the same result executing the query from SQLPLUS ?
(copy the sql generated by disco and run it in SQL)
Thanks
Mohamed

Source system deletion before copy or refresh of Non productive system

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for