Spatial query using C#

hi,
we're getting some odd behaviour using the Oracle Data Provider for .Net. spatial queries return no data unless the indexes on the queried table are rebuilt, the query returns data when executed using sql*plus.
we're coding in C#, the database version is 9.2.
is this a bug, has it been reported, and is there any documentation on it?
are they any on-line resources i could refer to?
any help will be appreciated (this is extremely urgent)
thanks
santosh sewlal

Seems something specific to Spatial and not to ODP.NET. Please work with Oracle Support to resolve this issue.

Similar Messages

  • Spatial Query, Use Multiple Cores

    Basic question, is SQL 2012 running on Windows 2008 R2 64 bit expected to use multiple cores to execute it's tasks?
    I have a table of points, 480, that has 3 empty columns that are being updated from 3 separate tables of polygons via a spatial join based on an intersection (STIntersects) of the point and polygons. All of the data is in 4326 and all tables have spatial
    indexes.
    The server running this query has 32 logical cores, but only 1 core is used and it is maxed out. It takes 53 seconds to complete the update. I have over a million points that need this done. I want to assume that if SQL can access more cores it will complete
    faster.
    I've looked at the actual execution plan and there is a 99% cost on the spatial query.
    update A
    set CONGRESS_DISTRICT = B.DISTRICT, HOUSE_DISTRICT = C.DISTRICT, SENATE_DISTRICT = D.DISTRICT
    from [LegislativeMapData2014].[dbo].[CNRM_INFORCE_EXTRACT093014_COMBINED_GEOCODED] A
    inner join [LegislativeMapData2014].[dbo].[CONGRESS_2014] B
    on A.FEATURE_SHAPE.STIntersects(B.FEATURE_SHAPE) = 1
    inner join [LegislativeMapData2014].[dbo].[HOUSE_2014] C
    on A.FEATURE_SHAPE.STIntersects(C.FEATURE_SHAPE) = 1
    inner join [LegislativeMapData2014].[dbo].[SENATE_2014] D
    on A.FEATURE_SHAPE.STIntersects(D.FEATURE_SHAPE) = 1
    Is there anything I can do to improve the performance of the query? Do I need to hint the indexes? Or something else?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    updating millions of records could lock your resource and other users may have trouble connecting or reading data.
    In some cases, variable table is your friend, insert the data you needed to a variable table before issuing the update.
    with that, you may need to have (nolock) on each table. eg. 
    [LegislativeMapData2014].[dbo].[CONGRESS_2014] (nolock)
    Regards,
    gioVhan
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.

  • Spatial query w/ logical operators in a subquery on Linux using Oracle 1

    Hello...
    I'm being given XML that I need to parse and create SQL from it. Below my signature is the SQL that I generate (its a simple example) and can be more elaborate due to the logical operators (AND and OR) given in the XML.
    The problem that we're seeing is performance-based: when one of the logical operator queries is Spatial-based, like below. Running it in JDBC, the query never returns.
    The spatial query just by itself returns ~300 rows (takes approximately 0.2 seconds). The "PERCENTAGE" query by itself returns about ~40000 rows (takes approximately ~.8 seconds).
    If we run the query below with 2 non-spatial subqueries, the result returns and performance is very acceptable (~ 0.9 seconds)-- the result set is about 80000 rows.
    Thanks,
    Jim
    =========================
    SELECT
    COLUMN_WE_WANT , RESULTS
    FROM
    TABLE_A
    WHERE
    COLUMN_WE_WANT IN
    SELECT
    COLUMN_WE_WANT
    FROM
    TABLE_A
    WHERE
    SDO_OVERLAPBDYINTERSECT(TABLE_A.MY_SPATIAL_COLUMN,
    SDO_GEOMETRY(2003,
    4326,
    null,
    SDO_elem_info_array( 1 , 3 , 1 ),
    SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY( lng_1,lat_1 , lng_2,lat_2 , lng_3,lat_3 , lng_4,lat_4 , lng_1,lat_1 )
    ) = 'TRUE'
    OR
    COLUMN_WE_WANT IN
    SELECT
    COLUMN_WE_WANT
    FROM
    TABLE_B
    WHERE
    SOME_PERCENTAGE_RATE_COLUMN < 90
    )

    Its difficult to comment without seeing the execution plan. You should trace this query to get a better idea of exactly what's happening.
    Depending on the complexity of the logical operators, I would look at doing this using set operations. So for an OR you might have...
    SELECT COLUMN_WE_WANT, RESULTS
    FROM TABLE_A
    WHERE COLUMN_WE_WANT IN (
         SELECT COLUMN_WE_WANT
         FROM TABLE_A
         WHERE SDO_OVERLAPBDYINTERSECT(TABLE_A.MY_SPATIAL_COLUMN,SDO_GEOMETRY(2003,4326,
         NULL, SDO_elem_info_array( 1 , 3 , 1 ),
         SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY( lng_1,lat_1 , lng_2,lat_2 , lng_3,lat_3 , lng_4,lat_4 , lng_1,lat_1 ) )) = 'TRUE'
    UNION
         SELECT COLUMN_WE_WANT
         FROM TABLE_B
         WHERE SOME_PERCENTAGE_RATE_COLUMN < 90)For an AND, you would use INTERSECT.
    Edited by: Reggie to remove the extra INTERSECT

  • Spatial Query not using Spatial Index

    Hi All,
    I have a query which uses the SDO_WITHIN_DISTANCE operator, but is taking far too long to complete.
    SELECT
                   RT.*,RD.RPD_NODE_ID, RD.RPD_XCOORD,RD.RPD_YCOORD
              FROM
                   railplan_data RD
                   LEFT JOIN Walk_data_sets WDS ON RD.RPD_RPS_ID = WDS.WDS_RPS_ID
                   LEFT JOIN RWNet_Temp RT ON WDS.WDS_ID = RT.RW_WDS_ID
              WHERE
                   WDS.wds_id = 441
              AND
                   MDSYS.SDO_WITHIN_DISTANCE(RT.RW_GEOM,RD.RPD_GEOLOC,'DISTANCE=' || TO_CHAR(RT.RW_BUFFER) || ' UNIT=METER') = 'TRUE';
    Upon generation of the explain plan I have realised that the spatial index is not being used in the query, but I can't for the life of me get the thing working
    3     | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost |
    4     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    5     | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 25841 | 99M| | 201 |
    6     |* 1 | FILTER | | | | | |
    7     | 2 | MERGE JOIN OUTER | | | | | |
    8     |* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 12652 | 420K| 2968K| 185 |
    9     | 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | RAILPLAN_DATA | 75910 | 2075K| | 60 |
    10     | 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| WALK_DATA_SETS | 1 | 6 | | 1 |
    11     |* 6 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | WDS_PK | 1 | | | |
    12     |* 7 | SORT JOIN | | 16 | 63760 | | 16 |
    13     |* 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | RWNET_TEMP | 16 | 63760 | | 4 |
    If anyone could help me out in figuring out why the spatial index is not being used, I would be most appreciative.
    TIA
    Dan

    Hi all again,
    Well I finally got an upgrade to Oracle 10 (yay!), so I am now trying to implement the SDO_JOIN method as per my earlier posts. In fact it is actually working, but I have a question. When I run an explain plan it does not show the use of any domain indexes which I would expect to see, but performs fine (1.07s) with just a few records (10 in 1 table, 15000 in the other), please see code and explain plan below:
    SELECT
      Distinct
        RT.RW_ID, RD.RPD_NODE_ID,
        RD.RPD_XCOORD,RD.RPD_YCOORD
    FROM
        RPD_TEMP_762 RD,
        WALK_DATA_SETS WDS,
        RWNET_TEMP RT,
        TABLE
        (SDO_JOIN
            (  'RWNET_TEMP',
                'RW_GEOM',
                'RPD_TEMP_762',
                'RPD_GEOLOC',
                'distance= ' || TO_CHAR(RT.RW_BUFFER) || ' unit=meter')) SPATIAL_JOIN_RESULT
    WHERE WDS.WDS_ID = RT.RW_WDS_ID
    AND WDS.WDS_ID = 762
    AND SPATIAL_JOIN_RESULT.ROWID1 = RT.ROWID
    AND SPATIAL_JOIN_RESULT.ROWID2 = RD.ROWID
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
    | Id  | Operation                            | Name         | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                     |              |    74 |  5994 | 21753   (1)|                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
    |   1 |  SORT UNIQUE                         |              |    74 |  5994 | 21691   (1)|                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
    |*  2 |   HASH JOIN                          |              |  1046K|    80M|  1859   (1)|                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
    |   3 |    NESTED LOOPS                      |              |  6076 |   213K|  1824   (1)|                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
    |   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                     |              |    74 |  2516 |   194   (1)|                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
    |*  5 |      INDEX UNIQUE SCAN               | WDS_PK       |     1 |     4 |     0   (0)|                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
    |*  6 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL               | RWNET_TEMP   |    74 |  2220 |   194   (1)|                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
    |*  7 |     COLLECTION ITERATOR PICKLER FETCH| SDO_JOIN     |       |       |            |                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
    |   8 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL                 | RPD_TEMP_762 | 17221 |   756K|    28   (0)|                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  When i try to add hints to force the use of spatial indexes the performance of this query drops through the floor (it takes minutes / hours), index hint shown below:
    /*+ ORDERED INDEX(RW rw_geom) INDEX(RD rpd_geoloc) */My question is is the first query using domain indexes, and if not, how do I get it to?
    TIA
    Dan

  • Spatial query w/ logical operators in a subquery on Linux using Oracle 10g

    Hello...
    I'm being given XML that I need to parse and create SQL from it. Below my signature is the SQL that I generate (its a simple example) and can be more elaborate due to the logical operators (AND and OR) given in the XML.
    The problem that we're seeing is performance-based: when one of the logical operator queries is Spatial-based, like below. Running it in JDBC, the query never returns.
    The spatial query just by itself returns ~300 rows (takes approximately 0.2 seconds). The "PERCENTAGE" query by itself returns about ~40000 rows (takes approximately ~.8 seconds).
    If we run the query below with 2 non-spatial subqueries, the result returns and performance is very acceptable (~ 0.9 seconds)-- the result set is about 80000 rows.
    Thanks,
    Jim
    =========================
    SELECT
    COLUMN_WE_WANT , RESULTS
    FROM
    TABLE_A
    WHERE
    COLUMN_WE_WANT IN
    SELECT
    COLUMN_WE_WANT
    FROM
    TABLE_A
    WHERE
    SDO_OVERLAPBDYINTERSECT(TABLE_A.MY_SPATIAL_COLUMN,
    SDO_GEOMETRY(2003,
    4326,
    null,
    SDO_elem_info_array( 1 , 3 , 1 ),
    SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY( lng_1,lat_1 , lng_2,lat_2 , lng_3,lat_3 , lng_4,lat_4 , lng_1,lat_1 ) )
    ) = 'TRUE'
    OR
    COLUMN_WE_WANT IN
    SELECT
    COLUMN_WE_WANT
    FROM
    TABLE_B
    WHERE
    SOME_PERCENTAGE_RATE_COLUMN < 90
    )

    There is a spatial forum. You will likely have a far better experience there.

  • SSRS - SQL Server Spatial Query

    Hi, I was hoping someone could help me.
    I'm creating an SSRS report with Map and importing points via SQL Server Spatial query. I have a db table with 8,000 points bu the import only ever brings in the first 2,000 queried (no matter what the filter is). Is there a limitation in SSRS that can be
    changed via a configuration setting?
    Many thanks in advance for any help on this,
    Steve.

    Really appreciate you coming back so quick Olaf.
    No its a straightforward query (select AccountNum, Name, Address, Longitude, Lattitude, UrbanArea, County, MI_STYLE, MI_PRINX, SP_GEOMETRY from <table>)
    Just to give the whole picture. I had 8,000 points in MapInfo version 10. I imported them to SQL Server 2012 via MapInfo Easy Loader.
    The SQL Server spatial points import to SSRS and the Bing overlay map works great (so they import to correct space) but its only a subset of the points that import. I can pick any subset using the WHERE clause but I cannot get all 8,000 points.  
    I was hoping there was a configuration setting somewhere in SSRS that was causing the problem.

  • Spatial query in a distributed environment

    We want to compare two spatial tables.
    We have (at present identical) tables on two computers GEOSRV0 and NB25.
    On both we have Oracle 10.1.0.2. GEOSRV0 has the WINDOWS 2000 operating system installed, on NB25 there is WINDOWS XP Professional.
    The table is EZG:
    GEOMETRY MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY
    GEOMETRY_SK VARCHAR2(15)
    EZG_NR NOT NULL NUMBER
    FLAECHE FLOAT(126)
    The primary key is EZG_NR.
    There is a private database link for the user WLKREP on NB25 to user WLKREP on GEOSRV0.
    The USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA are the same on both machines (same SRID, same DIMINFO).
    The following query – we check, if for each record on NB25 is a record on GEOSRV0 - works normally:
    SQL> select ezg_nr from
    2 ezg a where not exists
    3 (select 1 from wlkrep.ezg@wlk where ezg_nr=a.ezg_nr);
    no rows selected
    This is correct.
    We can read the geometry on the remote database:
    SQL> select * from wlkrep.ezg@wlk where rownum=1;
    GEOMETRY(SDO_GTYPE, SDO_SRID, SDO_POINT(X, Y, Z), SDO_ELEM_INFO, SDO_ORDINATES)
    GEOMETRY_SK EZG_NR FLAECHE
    SDO_GEOMETRY(3003, 1040001, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 1003, 1), SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(182285.489, 405672.889, 0, 182248.701, 405644.889, 0, 182241.984, 405639.771, 0, 182171.753, 405538.805, 0, 182130.953, 405498.016, 0, 181971.1, 405274.91
    6, 0, 182223.796, 405176.609, 0, 182292.701, 405204.37, 0, 182439.028, 405451.66
    , 0, 182573.506, 405628.153, 0, 182643.64, 405726.59, 0, 182718.945, 405764.608,
    0, 182780.371, 405805.57, 0, 182862.191, 405843.931, 0, 182966.69, 405933.13, 0
    , 183131.065, 406064.852, 0, 183205.098, 406160.637, 0, 183231.535, 406220.959,
    0, 183266.473, 406265.415, 0, 183308.669, 406303.524, 0, 183295.305, 406364.696,
    0, 183204.283, 406331.35, 0, 183161.835, 406299.691, 0, 183134.554, 406243.403,
    GEOMETRY(SDO_GTYPE, SDO_SRID, SDO_POINT(X, Y, Z), SDO_ELEM_INFO, SDO_ORDINATES)
    GEOMETRY_SK EZG_NR FLAECHE
    0, 183080.454, 406171.548, 0, 183027.376, 406123.698, 0, 182914.558, 406039.291
    , 0, 182770.335, 405973.138, 0, 182593.691, 405886.413, 0, 182443.506, 405795.85
    2, 0, 182343.293, 405713.991, 0, 182285.489, 405672.889, 0))
    13 304906.065
    Now we want to compare the geometry and get
    SQL> select a.ezg_nr from
    2 wlkrep.ezg@wlk b, ezg a where a.ezg_nr=b.ezg_nr and
    3 sdo_equal(a.geometry,b.geometry) != 'TRUE';
    select a.ezg_nr from
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
    Only comparing two elements gives the same result
    SQL> select a.ezg_nr from
    2 wlkrep.ezg@wlk b, ezg a where a.ezg_nr=640 and
    3 b.ezg_nr = 640 and
    4 sdo_equal(a.geometry,b.geometry) = 'TRUE';
    select a.ezg_nr from
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
    Even if we query a non existing element
    select count(*) from ezg where ezg_nr=99999;
    COUNT(*)
    0
    SQL> select a.ezg_nr from
    2 wlkrep.ezg@wlk b, ezg a where a.ezg_nr=99999 and
    3 b.ezg_nr = 99999 and
    4 sdo_equal(a.geometry,b.geometry) = 'TRUE';
    select a.ezg_nr from
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
    Is this a bug or is a distributed spatial query not supported?
    The following statement works:
    SQL> select a.ezg_nr from
    2 wlkrep.ezg@wlk a where not exists
    3 (select 1 from ezg b where
    4 b.ezg_nr=a.ezg_nr and
    5 sdo_equal(b.geometry,a.geometry)='TRUE');
    no rows selected
    Regards
    Karl

    Actually, I have filed a TAR to Oracle on this. I also spoke to Steve Muench about it at OracleWorld, briefly. As of today, I'm trying to add to DataScroller.java to make it implement java.io.Serializable (with no luck...maybe someone can comment on what I'm doing wrong).
    Here's what I have done so far.
    Changed DataScroller.java (located in bc4jhtmlsrc.zip) to the following:
    public class DataScroller implements java.io.Serializable
    I added the following members per the docs on java.io.Serializable
    private void writeObject(java.io.ObjectOutputStream out)
    throws IOException
    // really don't need to save state. Next call will recompute what's necessary
    private void readObject(java.io.ObjectInputStream in)
    throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException
    // really don't need to load state. Next call will recompute what's necessary
    I then used jar xvf to "unjar" datatags.jar, replaced DataScroller.class with my version and used
    jar cv0Mf datatags.jar META-INF/* oracle/*
    to recreate the datatags.jar. My file is not 100% the exact same as their file, but it looks to be right to me. I ended up doing it this way because the oracle\ord\* classes are not in the bc4jhtmlsrc.zip, only in the jar file and felt this was the "safest" way to include the correct contents of the file.
    HOWEVER -- I'm sorry to say that I've then tried to run my app and get the same issue.
    Thanks,
    Jeff

  • Spatial Query with multiple geometries from 2 tables

    Hi,
    I'm using Oracle 8.1.7. I am trying to do a spatial query on two tables with multiple geometries. There are two spatial tables. One made up of points and one made up of polygons. There are 829551 rows in the table of points and 1817795 rows in the table with polygons...
    I want to find all polygons where one of this points is within it...
    This query is pretty intensive querying two large spatial tables against each other and so I need to find the most efficient way of running this query. I've been running variations of my query for the last two week and every time it's bombed out with various errors after 12-24 hrs processing like out of memory, out of tablespace, out of processing, invalid index etc etc etc. I need to get this query run asap... Any tips would be gratefully appreciated..
    For the session running the query I've allocated 16M sort area with
    ALTER SESSION SET SORT_AREA_SIZE=16777216;
    Below is the query I'm running... How can I improve this please? BTW PARCEL_OVERLAPS contains the points and TP$_PARCEL_AREAS the polygons.
    SELECT lu.LNU_PARCEL_ID
         FROM
              seventy.PARCEL_OVERLAPS po,
              imap_topol.TP$_PARCEL_AREAS pa,
              TP$_PARCEL_CENTROID_AREA pca,
              TDCR_LAND_UNIT lu
         WHERE
              SDO_FILTER(po.geometry, pa.area,
              'querytype=WINDOW') = ’TRUE’ and
              sdo_within_distance(po.geometry,pa.area,'distance=0')='TRUE' and
              pa.delete_date is null and
              Lu.LNU_LAND_UNIT_UNIQUE_NUM = pca.CENTROID_ID and
              pa.AREA_ID = pca.AREA_ID and
              pca.DELETE_DATE IS NULL and
              pa.DELETE_DATE IS NULL;

    Albert,
    Thanks for your reply and the tips you've given. The tp$_parcel_areas table will always be bigger so I've changed the order to sdo_within_distance(pa.area,po.geometry,'distance=0')='TRUE'. The requested counts for those queries are
    12:26:29 [email protected]:SQL> select count(*)
    13:46:22 2 from seventy.PARCEL_OVERLAPS;
    COUNT(*)
    612
    13:48:12 [email protected]:SQL> select count(*)
    13:48:17 2 from imap_topol.TP$_PARCEL_AREAS pa,
    13:48:21 3 TP$_PARCEL_CENTROID_AREA pca
    13:48:21 4 where pca.DELETE_DATE IS NULL
    13:48:21 5 and pa.DELETE_DATE IS NULL
    13:48:21 6 and pa.AREA_ID = pca.AREA_ID;
    COUNT(*)
    1310665
    There was no reason for both filter and within_distance. I did try use the anyinteract but for some reason that does not return the desired results(I've added one id row as a test to make sure it returns desired results). Plus Oracle have recomended using the within distance for better performance..
    so the explan plan for
    14:38:37 [email protected]:SQL> EXPLAIN PLAN FOR
    14:38:50 2 SELECT lu.LNU_PARCEL_ID
    14:38:50 3 FROM
    14:38:50 4 seventy.PARCEL_OVERLAPS po,
    14:38:50 5 imap_topol.TP$_PARCEL_AREAS pa,
    14:38:50 6 TP$_PARCEL_CENTROID_AREA pca,
    14:38:50 7 TDCR_LAND_UNIT lu
    14:38:50 8 WHERE
    14:38:50 9 sdo_within_distance(pa.area,po.geometry,'distance=0')='TRUE' and
    14:38:50 10 pa.delete_date is null and
    14:38:50 11 Lu.LNU_LAND_UNIT_UNIQUE_NUM = pca.CENTROID_ID and
    14:38:50 12 pa.AREA_ID = pca.AREA_ID and
    14:38:50 13 pca.DELETE_DATE IS NULL and
    14:38:50 14 pa.DELETE_DATE IS NULL;
    is
    Plan Table
    | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes| Cost | Pstart| Pstop |
    | SELECT STATEMENT | | 4G|32920G| 547M| | |
    | NESTED LOOPS | | 4G|32920G| 547M| | |
    | MERGE JOIN | | 547M| 2029G| 230124 | | |
    | SORT JOIN | | 1M| 36M| 85014 | | |
    | MERGE JOIN | | 1M| 36M| 50019 | | |
    | SORT JOIN | | 1M| 17M| 21650 | | |
    | TABLE ACCESS FULL |TP$_PARCE | 1M| 17M| 485 | | |
    | SORT JOIN | | 1M| 22M| 28369 | | |
    | TABLE ACCESS FULL |TDCR_LAND | 1M| 22M| 2127 | | |
    | SORT JOIN | | 42K| 160M| 145111 | | |
    | TABLE ACCESS FULL |TP$_PARCE | 42K| 160M| 12697 | | |
    | TABLE ACCESS FULL |PARCEL_OV | 817 | 3M| 1 | | |
    14:43:14 [email protected]:SQL> explain plan for
    14:43:23 2 SELECT pa.AREA_ID
    14:43:23 3 FROM seventy.PARCEL_OVERLAPS po,
    14:43:23 4 imap_topol.TP$_PARCEL_AREAS pa
    14:43:23 5 WHERE SDO_RELATE(po.geometry, pa.area,'mask=ANTINTERACT querytype=WINDOW') = 'TRUE'
    14:43:23 6 and pa.DELETE_DATE IS NULL;
    Plan Table
    | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes| Cost | Pstart| Pstop |
    | SELECT STATEMENT | | 6M| 50G| 10M| | |
    | NESTED LOOPS | | 6M| 50G| 10M| | |
    | TABLE ACCESS FULL |PARCEL_OV | 817 | 3M| 1 | | |
    | TABLE ACCESS FULL |TP$_PARCE | 850K| 3G| 12697 | | |
    14:45:03 [email protected]:SQL> explain plan for
    14:45:04 2 SELECT pa.AREA_ID
    14:45:05 3 FROM seventy.PARCEL_OVERLAPS po,
    14:45:05 4 imap_topol.TP$_PARCEL_AREAS pa
    14:45:05 5 WHERE SDO_RELATE(pa.area, po.geometry,'mask=ANTINTERACT querytype=WINDOW') = 'TRUE'
    14:45:05 6 and pa.DELETE_DATE IS NULL;
    Plan Table
    | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes| Cost | Pstart| Pstop |
    | SELECT STATEMENT | | 6M| 50G| 863554 | | |
    | NESTED LOOPS | | 6M| 50G| 863554 | | |
    | TABLE ACCESS FULL |TP$_PARCE | 850K| 3G| 12697 | | |
    | TABLE ACCESS FULL |PARCEL_OV | 817 | 3M| 1 | | |
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • Export with embedded spatial query

    I am trying to use the exp utility to export spatial data. I am using the "query" parameter to specify a spatial query based on another spatial layer.
    I have two layers. Admin1 has lots of administrative boundaries. PE has three polygons in it over different sections of my data set. I want to get the data extracted from admin1 that exists in these areas to an export file(along with all the triggers and other related database objects). I was hoping this approach would work
    I am getting errors saying that the identifier is too long.
    Here is the par file:
    file=1.exp
    log=1.log
    tables=(admin1, pe)
    query="""WHERE mdsys.SDO_RELATE(GEOM1,pe.GEOM, 'MASK=INSIDE QUERYTYPE=WINDOW')='TRUE' OR SDO_RELATE(GEOM2,pe.GEOM, 'MASK=INSIDE QUERYTYPE=WINDOW')='TRUE'"""
    I get:
    Export: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Wed May 10 11:56:14 2006
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
    Connected to: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Produc
    tion
    With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
    Export done in WE8MSWIN1252 character set and AL16UTF16 NCHAR character set
    About to export specified tables via Conventional Path ...
    . . exporting table ADMIN1
    EXP-00056: ORACLE error 972 encountered
    ORA-00972: identifier is too long
    . . exporting table PE
    EXP-00056: ORACLE error 972 encountered
    ORA-00972: identifier is too long
    Export terminated successfully with warnings.
    Is this even possible? Can you use the exp query parameter to perform a spatial operation? Did this work? I am accustom to seeing record counts next to the exported tables, and they are not present in the output from exp. The export file is not empty. It exported all the features, not the subset I had requested.
    How can I structure the query differently so that I get the export file with just the lines that fall within the polygons?
    Thanks,
    John

    I am trying to use the exp utility to export spatial data. I am using the "query" parameter to specify a spatial query based on another spatial layer.
    I have two layers. Admin1 has lots of administrative boundaries. PE has three polygons in it over different sections of my data set. I want to get the data extracted from admin1 that exists in these areas to an export file(along with all the triggers and other related database objects). I was hoping this approach would work
    I am getting errors saying that the identifier is too long.
    Here is the par file:
    file=1.exp
    log=1.log
    tables=(admin1, pe)
    query="""WHERE mdsys.SDO_RELATE(GEOM1,pe.GEOM, 'MASK=INSIDE QUERYTYPE=WINDOW')='TRUE' OR SDO_RELATE(GEOM2,pe.GEOM, 'MASK=INSIDE QUERYTYPE=WINDOW')='TRUE'"""
    I get:
    Export: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Wed May 10 11:56:14 2006
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
    Connected to: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Produc
    tion
    With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
    Export done in WE8MSWIN1252 character set and AL16UTF16 NCHAR character set
    About to export specified tables via Conventional Path ...
    . . exporting table ADMIN1
    EXP-00056: ORACLE error 972 encountered
    ORA-00972: identifier is too long
    . . exporting table PE
    EXP-00056: ORACLE error 972 encountered
    ORA-00972: identifier is too long
    Export terminated successfully with warnings.
    Is this even possible? Can you use the exp query parameter to perform a spatial operation? Did this work? I am accustom to seeing record counts next to the exported tables, and they are not present in the output from exp. The export file is not empty. It exported all the features, not the subset I had requested.
    How can I structure the query differently so that I get the export file with just the lines that fall within the polygons?
    Thanks,
    John

  • Poor performance with Oracle Spatial when spatial query invoked remotely

    Is anyone aware of any problems with Oracle Spatial (10.2.0.4 with patches 6989483 and 7003151 on Red Hat Linux 4) which might explain why a spatial query (SDO_WITHIN_DISTANCE) would perform 20 times worse when it was invoked remotely from another computer (using SQLplus) vs. invoking the very same query from the database server itself (also using SQLplus)?
    Does Oracle Spatial have any known problems with servers which use SAN disk storage? That is the primary difference between a server in which I see this poor performance and another server where the performance is fine.
    Thank you in advance for any thoughts you might share.

    OK, that's clearer.
    Are you sure it is the SQL inside the procedure that is causing the problem? To check, try extracting the SQL from inside the procedure and run it in SQLPLUS with
    set autotrace on
    set timing on
    SELECT ....If the plans and performance are the same then it may be something inside the procedure itself.
    Have you profiled the procedure? Here is an example of how to do it:
    Prompt Firstly, create PL/SQL profiler table
    @$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/proftab.sql
    Prompt Secondly, use the profiler to gather stats on execution characteristics
    DECLARE
      l_run_num PLS_INTEGER := 1;
      l_max_num PLS_INTEGER := 1;
      v_geom    mdsys.sdo_geometry := mdsys.sdo_geometry(2002,null,null,sdo_elem_info_array(1,2,1),sdo_ordinate_array(0,0,45,45,90,0,135,45,180,0,180,-45,45,-45,0,0));
    BEGIN
      dbms_output.put_line('Start Profiler Result = ' || DBMS_PROFILER.START_PROFILER(run_comment => 'PARALLEL PROFILE'));  -- The comment name can be anything: here it is related to the Parallel procedure I am testing.
      v_geom := Parallel(v_geom,10,0.05,1);  -- Put your procedure call here
      dbms_output.put_line('Stop Profiler Result = ' || DBMS_PROFILER.STOP_PROFILER );
    END;
    SHOW ERRORS
    Prompt Finally, report activity
    COLUMN runid FORMAT 99999
    COLUMN run_comment FORMAT A40
    SELECT runid || ',' || run_date || ',' || run_comment || ',' || run_total_time
      FROM plsql_profiler_runs
      ORDER BY runid;
    COLUMN runid       FORMAT 99999
    COLUMN unit_number FORMAT 99999
    COLUMN unit_type   FORMAT A20
    COLUMN unit_owner  FORMAT A20
    COLUMN text        FORMAT A100
    compute sum label 'Total_Time' of total_time on runid
    break on runid skip 1
    set linesize 200
    SELECT u.runid || ',' ||
           u.unit_name,
           d.line#,
           d.total_occur,
           d.total_time,
           text
    FROM   plsql_profiler_units u
           JOIN plsql_profiler_data d ON u.runid = d.runid
                                         AND
                                         u.unit_number = d.unit_number
           JOIN all_source als ON ( als.owner = 'CODESYS'
                                   AND als.type = u.unit_type
                                   AND als.name = u.unit_name
                                AND als.line = d.line# )
    WHERE  u.runid = (SELECT max(runid) FROM plsql_profiler_runs)
    ORDER BY d.total_time desc;Run the profiler in both environments and see if you can see where the slowdown exists.
    regards
    Simon

  • Oracle 9i 10g slow spatial query

    I have been using the following spatial query in oracle 9i to assign jurisdictions to spatial points.
    SELECT /*+ordered*/ L.TCH_X_COORD, L.TCH_Y_COORD, T.NAME
    FROM tis.tis_coordinates_hold_on L,
    geospatial.mdt_admin_districts T
    WHERE SDO_RELATE(T.GEOMETRY,
    MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(2001,41079,MDSYS.SDO_POINT_TYPE(tch_x_coord,tch_y_coord,NULL),
    NULL,NULL),'mask=ANYINTERACT querytype=WINDOW') = 'TRUE'
    AND tch_assigned_base_rte='M00001N'
    By using the ordered hint I was able to double the retrieval rate.  My problem is this: We are now migrating to oracle 10g, and the use of the ordered returns no rows (different incorrect results). If I remove the + ordered the results are correct, but I no longer get the increased speed of retrieval. Has anyone run into this problem, and can you suggest a way that I could speed up this query. As it stands now it takes more than 1/2 sec for each record retrieved, and I have millions of records !! Thanks.

    We're using 10.2.4.0 I believe I have found the reason the queries were different. When I dropped the spatial index and re-created it, the query returned the same rows as 9i. However, I still have an issue with the speed. 10g appears to be about 1/3 as fast as 9i was. It doesn't seem to make any difference whether I put in the +ordered or not.  Our dba says just based on cpu and processing speed the server that has 10g should be significantly faster.  Any comments?  Thanks.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • Spatial query on join view in another schema

    Background:
    I have a schema with tables containing four spatial columns per table. I have a second schema that contains join views of the tables in the first schema. The join view consists of the attributes and any other tabular data that is joined via foreign key to non-spatial tables and one of the four geometry columns. I have a third schema that owns no database objects of its own, but has select privilege to the second schema's view objects.
    We are using Oracle 10.2.0.2 on a windows platform.
    This worked in 9i, the problem only presented itself when we migrated to 10g.
    Problem:
    When I run a spatial query on a join view in the second schema(the schema that owns the object), it runs and returns results in about a second. When I run the exact same query in the third schema it routinely takes 20-30 seconds.
    Here is the query that I run in both schemas with varying query times:
    SELECT COUNT(*)
    FROM two.join_view_a A
    WHERE (MDSYS.SDO_FILTER(A.GEOM, SDO_GEOMETRY(2003,8307,NULL,SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,1003,3),SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(26.6396,26.5708,43.346,34.4083)),'QUERYTYPE=WINDOW')='TRUE');
    Question:
    Why does this happen?
    What can I do to fix this problem?
    Thanks,
    John

    Have a read of this posting: Oracle spatial view runing slow as different user
    There are details there about the 'optimizer_secure_view_merging' parameter and the effect it can have on cross schema views in 10.2

  • Index problem in a spatial query

    I try to run following query in SQL Plus:
    SELECT A.objectid FROM TABBDG A, TABREG B
    WHERE A.objectid = 68 AND B.regionname = 'Hong2'
    AND SDO_RELATE(A.geoloc, B.geoloc, 'mask=INSIDE querytype = WINDOW') = 'TRUE';
    To find out weather or not objectid = 68 is inside of region (='Hong2"). I got following error messages:
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-13226: interface not supported without a spatial index
    ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.MD", line 1723
    ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.MDERR", line 8
    ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_3GL", line 57
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    But when I try to add an index to table TABREG, I got following error:
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-29879: cannot create multiple domain indexes on a column list using same indextype
    Seem to me that the index was already there. Can any one help me? Thanks.

    I found out the reason of problem. I used an old version of EasyLoader (4.5?). When I get the latest EasyLoader V6.5, there is no problem any more to run spatial query. You can get lates EasyLoader V6.5 from MapInfo or from me at: [email protected]
    Thanks for all help.

  • Slow running spatial query

    I am hoping someone can help. I am writing alot of spatial queries but I am having a hard time figuring out what is wrong with this one and maybe someone can give me some advise. Here is my query
    select count(inc) from public_crimeshapes.aggassault2004 h, spatial.tracts2000 t
    where mdsys.sdo_relate(h.geom, t.geom,'mask = anyinteract querytype=window') = 'TRUE'
    and tract2000 = 012300 and
    (to_char(to_date(h.fr_date,'yyyymmdd'), 'MM/DD/YYYY') >= '01/01/2004') and
    (to_char(to_date(h.fr_date,'yyyymmdd'), 'MM/DD/YYYY') <= '12/31/2004')
    This one runs fast in less than 3 secs but if I added multiple tract2000 numbers like this
    select count(inc) from public_crimeshapes.aggassault2004 h, spatial.tracts2000 t
    where mdsys.sdo_relate(h.geom, t.geom,'mask = anyinteract querytype=window') = 'TRUE'
    and tract2000 in (012300,012400,012500,014300,014400,016600,016700,016800,016900,017000,017100,017200,017300,017400) and
    (to_char(to_date(h.fr_date,'yyyymmdd'), 'MM/DD/YYYY') >= '01/01/2004') and
    (to_char(to_date(h.fr_date,'yyyymmdd'), 'MM/DD/YYYY') <= '12/31/2004')
    it will take like 5 mins to run. Is there another way to run a spaital query on multiplue polygons? Tracts2000 is a polygon and aggassault2004 is a point file. Thanks for the help I am running Oracle Spatial 9i.
    Matt

    Hi,
    Can you try the following:
    select /*+ ordered */ count(inc)
    from spatial.tracts2000 t, public_crimeshapes.aggassault2004 h
    where mdsys.sdo_relate(h.geom, t.geom,'mask = anyinteract querytype=window') = 'TRUE'
    and tract2000 in (012300,012400,012500,014300,014400,016600,016700,016800,016900,017000,017100,017200,017300,017400) and
    (to_char(to_date(h.fr_date,'yyyymmdd'), 'MM/DD/YYYY') >= '01/01/2004') and
    (to_char(to_date(h.fr_date,'yyyymmdd'), 'MM/DD/YYYY') <= '12/31/2004');
    Note I added the ordered hint, AND reversed the order of the tables in the from clause. What this will hopefully tell the optimizer is:
    find the tract2000 from the tracts2000 table (hopefully you have a non-spatial index here) using the in clause. Do this first, then:
    for each of those, use the spatial index to find the assault cases.
    Hopefully this will be fast.
    If the assault cases are stored as point data, when you create the spatial index use layer_gtype=point to ensure best performance.

  • Spatial query optimizing

    hi, there.
    I am working Oracle Spatial 9.0.1 and I have a problem about the
    performance of spaital query, can someone help me resolve it?
    /*query 1*/
    select t1.line_seg
    from spatial_list_Traj
    where sdo_within_distance(convert_trajseg_to_lineseg
    (t1.line_seg), MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(2003, NULL, NULL,
    MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 1003, 3), MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY
    (212.117, 352.613, 221.617, 362.708)), 'querytype=filter
    distance=0.5') = 'TRUE';
    /* query 2*/
    select t1.line_seg
    from spatial_list_traj
    where object_id = 1 and sdo_within_distance
    (convert_trajseg_to_lineseg(t1.line_seg), MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY
    (2003, NULL, NULL, MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 1003, 3),
    MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(212.117, 352.613, 221.617,
    362.708)), 'querytype=filter distance=0.5') = 'TRUE';
    there are about 120,000 rows in the spatial_list_Traj table and
    query 1 takes only 1 second to finish, which is a good result
    but if I add another condition, like query 2, the time cost is
    still 1 second. I thought it can be much faster since there is
    only 48 rows whose object_id is 1. what I expected it to do was
    for the optimizer to filter out the rows that match
    the 'object_id = 1' criteria and then do a spatial query on the
    filtered data.
    PS: there are two indices--a b-tree index on column 'object_id'
    and of course, a functional spatial index on column 'line_seg',
    which is a R-tree.
    thanks in advance
    Hu Cao

    Hi Hu,
    The second query is probably not using the spatial index. The
    spatial index indexes the whole table based on spatial
    relationships, so even though you may have filtered out all but
    48 rows, the spatial index has to be applied to all of the rows.
    In this case, it is probable that all of the rows returned with
    object_id=1 are being geometrically compared with your query
    window, which may account for the extra time.
    You may want to try a hint to tell the optimizer not to use the
    index on object_id, i.e.
    SELECT /*+NO_INDEX(spatial_list_traj object_id_index_name)*/
    Hope this helps,
    dan

Maybe you are looking for

  • The certificate for this server is invalid skype

    I am attempting at access My Account on an iPhone 5, I am getting a message saying the certificate for this server is invalid.  You might be connecting to a server that is pretending to be "secure.skype.com" which could put your confidential informat

  • Why do I get Error 32812?

    I wrote a VI, which worked perfectly. After addressing the cFP from the network instead of from the PC, some Read tags gave Error 32812. For one of them I deleted them and wrote them again, and the error was recovered. But then it appeared for anothe

  • Dynamic Fonts loading in CS4 vs CS3. What has changed?!

    Hi there, I've had BIG troubles loading dynamic fonts in CS4. Well I had a whole library written in AS3 for CS3 which works just fine. But the whole thing doesn't work anymore in CS4. The textfields are empty although the fonts are loaded and registe

  • Barcode usage in sap

    Hi, I need some documents for using the barcode functionality in sap with out activating the WM? I know that there is std functionality available in sap. How do i configure this in SAP? Thanks Srini

  • Replacement iPhone, Unable to edit music on iPhone

    I recently dropped my iPhone in the bath and upon receiving my replacement I connected it to my computer and synced it with my existing iTunes library. All the songs transferred fine but now when I connect my iPhone and look under devices-> Liana's i