SQL*Plus and Oracle 9i Lite

What is the trick to connecting to Oracle 9i Lite using SQL*Plus?
I am using the following:
Username: system
Password: aaa
Host String: ODBC:POLite
I recieve an ORA-12203: TNS:unable to connect to destination: Function not performed
do I need an entry in my tnsnames.ora file? If yes what? Also, if yes, where in the docs is this discussed?
Thanks in advance

Try format
ODBC:POLITE:datasource
for Polite:
ODBC:POLITE:POLITE
But since 4.0.1 Oracle Lite you can't use SQL plus.
Use new tool named msql (<ora home>\Mobile\SDK\BIN\msql.exe) or SQL Worksheet in Oracle9i JDeveloper.

Similar Messages

SQL*Plus and Oracle

Hi, i have recently started a new course where i am required to learn sql using the sql*plus program and several books. I have downloaded the instant client and the sql*plus program so that i can run them on my computer at home so i can learn at home. However i get a problem where i cannot logon to sql*plus.
I believe this may be because i do not have an oracle server running on my pc, i am however not sure, would be gratefull for any help.

Yes, you will need an Oracle Server to connect to. On your personal system, you can download Oracle XE (Express Edition) from OTN and use that. It contains both the server and client (SQL*Plus) components.

Oracle 9.0.1 SQL*Plus and PL/SQL

Having just upgraded from Oracle 8.0.1 to the above, can anyone suggest a good book for learning the above languages as I believe there is quite a lot of difference in the codes, which also contains some good exercises for trying them out.
Phil.

I would take a look at this for PL/SQL:
Oracle PL/SQL Programming, 3rd Edition
If you want to learn SQL, you can try this book, which some people I know have liked: Mastering Oracle SQL
For the extra features of SQL*Plus, the Oracle manual is very complete and should be sufficient.

SQL Plus and ODBC w/different database types

In order to connect to Oracle lite, we go through ODBC in SQL Plus (ex:login/pw@ODBC:polite)
Can I utilize this method to connect SQL Plus to a SQL Server 7 database and from there run the COPY TO command to copy data into my Oracle database? If so, what do I need to install to make this work? Is there a specific version of SQL Plus that this works with?

examples:
- optimizer_mode is 'RULE' when I select using SQL*Plus and 'CHOOSE' when I use SQL*Plus Worksheet.
- large_pool_size is 32Mb when I select using SQL*Plus and 108Mb when I use SQL*Plus Worksheet.
etc.

Problem in starting SQL*PLUS in oracle database 10g

Hi
Well I am facing one problem while starting SQL*PLUS in oracle database 10g
ERROR - "Procedure entry point longjmp could not be located in dynamic link library orauts.dll"
This has happened when I installed Oracle Database 11g on same machine and when I deinstalled Oracle 11g then SQL*PLUS is started...no error came
Can anybody tell me the reason please...

hi
pls im having the same problem but in my own case i installed oracle apex using 11g.
im env variable is:
C:\Oracle\product\10.1.0\Client_1\bin;C:\Oracle\product\10.1.0\Client_1\jre\1.4.2\bin\client;C:\Oracle\product\10.1.0\Client_1\jre\1.4.2\bin;C:\app\Xty\product\11.2.0\dbhome_1\bin;%SystemRoot%\system32;%SystemRoot%;%SystemRoot%\System32\Wbem;;C:\Program Files\TortoiseSVN\bin;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\80\Tools\Binn\;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\DTS\Binn\;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Tools\binn\;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\90\Tools\Binn\VSShell\Common7\IDE\;C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\Common7\IDE\PrivateAssemblies\
pls which is my apex_home so i can interchange it?
i also have oracle 10g client installed

[0098]SQL*Plus encountered oracle error 100 while executing SQL Statement

Hi,
i'm trying to delete duplicate records from a table and running following script. this script is triggered from a unix script. it successfully deletes the records but in the last throws following error message,
:[0098]SQL*Plus encountered oracle error 100 while executing SQL Statement:2:Investigation required:
can anybody please help? below is the script.
DECLARE
--CURSOR FOR DUPLICATE ROWS
CURSOR CUR_DUPLICATE_ROWS IS
Select RMS_NOTE_ID, RMS_SUMMARY_NOTE_ID, count(*) cnt from PARTY_NOTE
group by RMS_NOTE_ID,RMS_SUMMARY_NOTE_ID having count(*) > 1;
var_date PARTY_NOTE.PARTY_NOTE_CREATED_DATE%TYPE;
BEGIN
FOR DUPLICATE_ROWS_REC IN CUR_DUPLICATE_ROWS
LOOP
delete from party_note
where RMS_NOTE_ID= DUPLICATE_ROWS_REC.RMS_NOTE_ID
and RMS_SUMMARY_NOTE_ID= DUPLICATE_ROWS_REC.RMS_SUMMARY_NOTE_ID
and rowid not in (select max(rowid) from party_note
where RMS_NOTE_ID= DUPLICATE_ROWS_REC.RMS_NOTE_ID and RMS_SUMMARY_NOTE_ID= DUPLICATE_ROWS_REC.RMS_SUMMARY_NOTE_ID);
commit;
END LOOP;
EXCEPTION
WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND THEN
NULL;
WHEN OTHERS THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(SQLERRM);
ROLLBACK;
END;

Try this:
delete party_note
where rowid not in (select max(rowid)
from party_note
group by rms_note_id, rms_summary_note_id
commit;No need for cursors and loops.
And when that's completed, consider ALTERing the table to add a unique index (or even a primary key) so you'll never need to do this again.

SQL*Plus with Oracle 10g Express Edition

How Can I do to log in using SQL*Plus into Oracle 10g?
My Schema is: Banco.Global
My Password is: 111111
I need to write SET SERVEROUTPUT ON to get answer?
I opened the Prompt, but i don't know to log in.
Thanks and my english is not as well as you.

If i write:
SQL>connect "Banco.Global"/111111
a error message is raised: Invalid username/password; logon denied
but if I log in into Home Page with the same Username and Password, I get to log in.
There is difference to connect SQL*Plus and the connect with Home Page the Oracle?
I need to connect with SQL*Plus, because i need to make a test.

SQL*Plus and NLS_DATE_FORMAT

So, I haven't visited this topic in a long time, so I'm trying to refresh my memory on how everything works ...
We set our NLS_DATE_FORMAT at the system level ... what ... 4 years ago to 'MM/DD/RR'. Despite the fact that I set this to something more commonly-used than the default of 'DD-Mon-RR', we've adopted the standard of always using TO_DATE() with an explicit format, just in case it's ever changed.
There were some applications that missed the standard, and now that a driver (for ColdFusion) has been updated, these SQL statements are now failing.
When I started looking into it, I realized that the system-level default of 'MM/DD/RR' should work fine. But, after experimenting in SQL*Plus and TOAD, I am thinking that either:
1) the system-level format is not being used
2) and/or there are login scripts which are setting these to something else
Coincidentally, both SQL*Plus and TOAD return the exact same query results:
SQL> select *
     from NLS_INSTANCE_PARAMETERS
     where parameter = 'NLS_DATE_FORMAT';
PARAMETER                      VALUE
NLS_DATE_FORMAT                MM/DD/RR
SQL> select *
     from NLS_SESSION_PARAMETERS
     where parameter = 'NLS_DATE_FORMAT';
PARAMETER                      VALUE
NLS_DATE_FORMAT                DD-MON-RRSo I looked into the glogin.sql script (which both tools share), and there's nothing mentioned about the NLS_DATE_FORMAT
-- Copyright (c) 1988, 2003, Oracle Corporation.
-- All Rights Reserved.
-- NAME
--   glogin.sql
-- DESCRIPTION
--   SQL*Plus global login "site profile" file
--   Add any SQL*Plus commands here that are to
--   be executed when a user starts SQL*Plus, or
--   uses the SQL*Plus CONNECT command
-- USAGE
--   This script is automatically run
-- Used by Trusted Oracle
COLUMN ROWLABEL FORMAT A15
-- Used for the SHOW ERRORS command
COLUMN LINE/COL FORMAT A8
COLUMN ERROR    FORMAT A65 WORD_WRAPPED
-- Used for the SHOW SGA command
COLUMN name_col_plus_show_sga FORMAT a24
COLUMN units_col_plus_show_sga FORMAT a15
-- Defaults for SHOW PARAMETERS
COLUMN name_col_plus_show_param FORMAT a36 HEADING NAME
COLUMN value_col_plus_show_param FORMAT a30 HEADING VALUE
-- Defaults for SHOW RECYCLEBIN
COLUMN origname_plus_show_recyc   FORMAT a16 HEADING 'ORIGINAL NAME'
COLUMN objectname_plus_show_recyc FORMAT a30 HEADING 'RECYCLEBIN NAME'
COLUMN objtype_plus_show_recyc    FORMAT a12 HEADING 'OBJECT TYPE'
COLUMN droptime_plus_show_recyc   FORMAT a19 HEADING 'DROP TIME'
-- Defaults for SET AUTOTRACE EXPLAIN report
COLUMN id_plus_exp FORMAT 990 HEADING i
COLUMN parent_id_plus_exp FORMAT 990 HEADING p
COLUMN plan_plus_exp FORMAT a60
COLUMN object_node_plus_exp FORMAT a8
COLUMN other_tag_plus_exp FORMAT a29
COLUMN other_plus_exp FORMAT a44
-- Used to alter the TOAD environment so that users do not have to
-- use the SET DEFINE OFF command prior to compiling code
-- Charles Forbes 10.17.2005
SET scan offIf I expressly go into either tool and execute, the following, setting the format to that already delcared at the system-level:
alter session set nls_date_format = 'MM/DD/RR'Then these SQL statements start running just fine again.
There's something that I'm missing in my basic understanding of how this works. I assumed that the driver update for ColdFusion perhaps enabled a different "glogin.sql"-type script equivalent for that tool ... until ... I started checking into how the NLS_DATE_FORMAT is supposed to work ... but isn't. Could someone help me clarify where the hole is in my understanding?
Thanks,
Chuck

chuckers wrote:
What's the difference, then, between NLS_SESSION_PARAMETERS and NLS_INSTANCE_PARAMETERS in my initial post? The glogin.sql script isn't altering the NLS_DATE_FORMAT for the desktop version of SQL*Plus, so I'm perplexed that the SESSION format differs from the INSTANCE format.NLS_SESSION_PARAMETERS are the NLS parameters that are in force for your particular session (i.e. the particular connection you have). Most client applications cause things like NLS_DATE_FORMAT to be set, overriding the NLS_INSTANCE_PARAMETERS. Instance-level NLS settings are most commonly used only for purely back-end processing (i.e. background jobs scheduled via DBMS_JOB or DBMS_SCHEDULER, etc.) 9 times out of 10, the client application is going to override the instance-level paramters.
I even opened SQL Developer, and got
select * from nls_session_parameters where parameter = 'NLS_DATE_FORMAT';
PARAMETER                      VALUE
NLS_DATE_FORMAT                DD-MON-RR
1 rows selected
select * from nls_instance_parameters where parameter = 'NLS_DATE_FORMAT'
PARAMETER                      VALUE
NLS_DATE_FORMAT                MM/DD/RR
1 rows selected
That's not unexpected. Java applications are going to use the Java regional properties at least to specify a date format. SQL Developer has a config option for the date format, so it may well be specifying a different format.
They're all 3 (Toad, SQL*Plus, TOAD) so suspiciously consistent, that I'm questioning some of the fundamentals of the NLS setup.
I went ahead and looked via SQL*Plus from the server-side, & things are looking more consistently in-line with my expectations:
[oracle@dvsrvr13 ~]$ sqlplus forbesc@d13
SQL*Plus: Release 10.1.0.4.0 - Production on Thu Mar 19 12:44:57 2009
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Enter password:
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.1.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
SQL> select * from nls_session_parameters where parameter = 'NLS_DATE_FORMAT';
PARAMETER                      VALUE
NLS_DATE_FORMAT                MM/DD/RR
SQL> select * from nls_instance_parameters where parameter = 'NLS_DATE_FORMAT';
PARAMETER                      VALUE
NLS_DATE_FORMAT                MM/DD/RR
SQL> exit
Disconnected from Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.1.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
[oracle@dvsrvr13 ~]$ locate glogin.sql
/u01/app/oracle/product/10.1.0/db_1/sqlplus/admin/glogin.sql
[oracle@dvsrvr13 ~]$ more /u01/app/oracle/product/10.1.0/db_1/sqlplus/admin/glogin.sql
-- Copyright (c) 1988, 2003, Oracle Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
-- NAME
--   glogin.sql
-- DESCRIPTION
--   SQL*Plus global login "site profile" file
--   Add any SQL*Plus commands here that are to be executed when a
--   user starts SQL*Plus, or uses the SQL*Plus CONNECT command
-- USAGE
--   This script is automatically run
-- Used by Trusted Oracle
COLUMN ROWLABEL FORMAT A15
-- Used for the SHOW ERRORS command
COLUMN LINE/COL FORMAT A8
COLUMN ERROR    FORMAT A65 WORD_WRAPPED
-- Used for the SHOW SGA command
COLUMN name_col_plus_show_sga FORMAT a24
COLUMN units_col_plus_show_sga FORMAT a15
-- Defaults for SHOW PARAMETERS
COLUMN name_col_plus_show_param FORMAT a36 HEADING NAME
COLUMN value_col_plus_show_param FORMAT a30 HEADING VALUE
-- Defaults for SHOW RECYCLEBIN
COLUMN origname_plus_show_recyc   FORMAT a16 HEADING 'ORIGINAL NAME'
COLUMN objectname_plus_show_recyc FORMAT a30 HEADING 'RECYCLEBIN NAME'
COLUMN objtype_plus_show_recyc    FORMAT a12 HEADING 'OBJECT TYPE'
COLUMN droptime_plus_show_recyc   FORMAT a19 HEADING 'DROP TIME'
-- Defaults for SET AUTOTRACE EXPLAIN report
COLUMN id_plus_exp FORMAT 990 HEADING i
COLUMN parent_id_plus_exp FORMAT 990 HEADING p
COLUMN plan_plus_exp FORMAT a60
COLUMN object_node_plus_exp FORMAT a8
COLUMN other_tag_plus_exp FORMAT a29
COLUMN other_plus_exp FORMAT a44
[oracle@dvsrvr13 ~]$ So in all, I'm just perplexed by the differences.
--=cfI'm not surprised that SQL*Plus from the Unix database server is going to have session-level settings that match the instance-level settings because there is probably nothing set in the Unix environment that would override the instance-level settings. There is probably no NLS_LANG or NLS_DATE_FORMAT set as environment variables and probably no central place to look for regional settings. Most applications, particularly Windows and Java apps, are going to have multiple places to look for that sort of information.
Justin

Cannot log in to SQL Plus on Oracle 8i

Hi,
I have Oracle 8i (8.1.6) Client installed on windows 200 professional. I donnot connect to any servers, and I want to use the SQL Plus module, but I have trouble to login SQL plus, and I an get error message:
ORA-12560: TNS:Protocole adapter error.
Would you please let me know what they are supposed to be: username, password and host string ?
Am I using the correct version, or I have to use the personnal edition, and if so I have Oracle 8i personnal edition, but it is not working with 2000, is there a patch file or do I have to download the 2000 version.
Thanks a lot in advance.

The default logins for Oracle8i are:
SYS/CHANGE_ON_INSTALL
SYSTEM/MANAGER
SCOTT/TIGER
If you are connecting to the default database, don't enter anything in the Host String area. If you are connecting to a remote database, you will need to set up Oracle Net on your machine to connect to the remote database (tnsnames.ora file).
Do you have a database to connect to? You have installed the Oracle8i Client, which should be used to connect to remote databases (on other machines). If you don't have a remote database, you should install the full Oracle9i Server component, not just the Client.
The Oracle8i Personal Edition includes a cut-down version of the Server and the Client, and I think this is what you should be using if you don't have a remote database to connect to.
Personal Edition Version 8.1.6 is now desupported, but was certified against Windows 2000. Personal Edition Version 8.1.7 is still supported and is also certified against Windows 2000.
Alison

URGENT - cannot log in to SQL Plus on Oracle 8i

Hi, I have Oracle 8i (8.1.6.0.0) installed on windows 98.
I want to use the SQL Plus module, but I have trouble to login SQL plus, and I an get error message:
ORA-12560: TNS:Protocol adapter error
I supposed the default username and password as follows:
SYS/CHANGE_ON_INSTALL
SYSTEM/MANAGER
SCOTT/TIGER
Am I using the correct version or edition (which I also don't know which edition)? Does windows 98 supports SQL Plus?
I was told to set up a database by selecting database administration then follow by database configuration assistant (in order to use the SQL Plus, firstly a database have to set up). I'm not sure whether this is true? but inside the database administration I don't have the so call "database configuration assistant". Can someone please help me?
Thanks a lot in advance!

I hope you can help, I'm in the same boat as the others who cannot log on to the SQL* using Oracle Personal Edition 8
I'm running on 98, and everytime I try entering SYS as username & CHANGE_ON_INSTALL as password, or SYSTEM as username & MANAGER as password; I get:
ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
ORA-27101: Shared memory realm does not exist
I've been trying for a number of days, and have created databases using the Database config assistant, and everytime, it gives me the details as SYS CHANGE_ON_INSTALL etc, but it still doesn't let me log into SQL*
Any help would be gratefully received,
Patrick

Entity Framework - Code First - Migration - How to access SQL Server and Oracle using the same context?

Hello,
I use Entity Framework code first approach.
My project is working fine with SQL Server. But, I want to access Oracle too. I want to switch SQL Server and Oracle in run time.
I am able to access Oracle using "Oracle.ManagedDataAccess.EntityFramework.dl" in a new project.
But, Is this possible to access SQL Server and Oracle in the same project.
Thanks,
Murugan

This should be possible with a Code-First workflow. In Code-First the database mapping layer is generated at runtime.
David
David http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dbrowne/

Different output of same query in SQL Server and Oracle

I have two tables table1 and table2
--table1 has two columns c1 int and c2 varchar. there are not constraints added in it. it has data as given below
c1     c2
6     d
5     j
102     g
4     g
103     f
3     h
501     j
1     g
601     n
2     m
--table2 has only one column c1 int. there are not constraints added in it. it has data as given below
c1
6
1
4
3
2
now when i run below given query in sql server and oracle it gives me different result
select *
from table1
     inner join (SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (order by c1 ASC) AS c1 from table2) table2 on table2.c1=table1.c1
sql server output
c1     c2     c1
1     g     1
2     m     2
3     h     3
4     g     4
5     j     5
oracle output
C1 C2 C1
5 j 5
4 g 4
3 h 3
1 g 1
2 m 2
If you notice the first column in both output. It is sorted in sql server and not in oracle.
Why it is behaving differently in oracle? Is there any way I can solve this in oracle?
Thanks,
Jigs

It is NOT behaving "differently" in Oracle; you just haven't specified an order that you expect your results to be in, so you're going to get output in whatever order the database fancies displaying it (ie. no guarenteed order). This is an artifact of how the database chooses to put together the data, and different databases (or even datasets within the same database) can and most likely will behave differently.
Even SQL Server won't guarentee to always get your data in an ordered fashion if you exclude the order by clause, even if you think it has always output the data in an ordered fashion.
Your solution is to add an order by clause, in BOTH databases, to force the order of the output data.

NVARCHAR - NVARCHAR2 datatype mapping between sql server and oracle.

Question regarding size allocation that occurs for NVARCHAR columns in sql server to NVARCHAR2 in Oracle in the migration tool.
The migration tool has converted NVARCHAR columns to be twice their size as NVARCH2 in Oracle. Example, a table whose column is mycol NVARCHAR(40) gets migrated as mycol NVARCHAR2(80).
In SQL Server land, the designation of a column as NVARCHAR(40) will physically store the column as 80 bytes. However, as I understand from this excerpt (taken from here: http://www.oracle.com/technology/oramag/oracle/03-nov/o63tech_glob.html), that Oracle in essence will do the same thing for NVARCHAR2:
To make it easy to allocate proper storage for Unicode values, Oracle9i Database introduced character semantics. You can now use a declaration such as VARCHAR2(3 CHAR), and Oracle will set aside the correct number of bytes to accommodate three characters in the underlying character set. In the case of AL32UTF8, Oracle will allocate 12 bytes, because the maximum length of a UTF-8 character encoding is four bytes (3 characters * 4 bytes/character = 12 bytes). On the other hand, if you're using AL16UTF16, in which case your declaration would be NVARCHAR2(3), Oracle allocates just six bytes (3 characters * 2 bytes/character = 6 bytes). One difference worth noting is that for UTF-8, a declaration using character semantics allows enough room for surrogate characters, whereas for UTF-16 that is not the case. A declaration such as NVARCHAR2(3) provides room for three UTF-16 code units, but a single supplementary character may consume two of those code units.
As I read this, NVARCHAR(40) in sql server should be equivalent to NVARCHAR2(40) in Oracle and not NVARCHAR2(80) as it gets translated to - am I missing something? We have a rather large database to migrate so I need to get this size allocation right (and I obviously don't want to truncate any data).
Thanks -

Right - well, that's what I'm suggesting is that NVARCHAR(8) in SQL Server is equivalent to NVARCHAR2(8) in Oracle. Truncation will occur after 8 of any character, including, say, double byte Kanjii characters, which would physically store 16 bytes in the NVARCHAR(8) NVARCHAR2(8) column defn. I tried that in both SQL Server and Oracle, and the behavior is the same.
Also, technically, NVARCHAR2(8) and VARCHAR2(8 CHAR) is roughly the same in terms of behavior, except that in the first case, the physical storage is 16 bytes, while in the second case, it's 24 bytes (to account for 'supplemental' characters or true UTF-8 compliance). Same truncation occurs after 8 of -any- character be it single byte ascii or double byte kanjii, which is the behavior I expect.
Thanks for looking into this. What I decided to do was the following:
What was originally defined in SQL Server as varchar (and translated to VARCHAR2 with the CHAR designation), I removed the CHAR designation since I truly want that number of bytes to be stored, and not characters (for columns I do not care about UTF8 or 16 compliance - that will also mimic the same behavior I currently have on the SQL Server side. For anything that was nvarchar in SQL Server, I went ahead and created them as VARCHAR2 with the CHAR designation, with the same size (not double the value as was in SQL Server which the documentation says it gets translated to). I did this since we probably will need true UTF-8 compliance down the line, and since I had the hood open, it was easy enough to do. I could also have converted NVARCHAR(n) to NVARCHAR2(n) (and not n*2) as what was happening in the migration.
I tested strings in both cases, and I think I have my solution.
Edited by: kpw on Sep 24, 2008 11:21 AM

Compare SQL Server and Oracle syntax

Hello, I am very new to the Oracle DB as I have been working with MS SQL Server for many years. I have a SQL statement that works fine in MSSQL but seems to not work in Oracle. Is this a syntax problem or do I need to look elsewhere?
DECLARE @as_master_key varchar(26)
EXEC [dbo].[GET_UNIQUE_MASTER_KEY]
     @as_project_name = N'CMDEMO',
     @as_database_site = N'CMPL',
     @as_user_initials = N'SK',
     @as_table = N'SUBMITTAL_CATEGORY',
     @as_master_key =
     @as_master_key
OUTPUT SELECT @as_master_key as N'master_key'
This is what I use in MSSQL and it works fine - but I am porting this application to an Oracle backend and it fails. Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance to this newbie. :)

SQL Server and Oracle are two completely different RDBMS'.
You'd be best not to try and port SQL Server code to Oracle SQL or PL/SQL directly as it will not favour the power of Oracle's features correctly.
I'm not sure what your code is supposed to be doing (I find SQL Server code awful to read, and never understand the need for "@" before variable names, that just seems to show a lazy parser (or lazy coder who designed the parser)).
From what I can guess it's going to be something like...
SQL code...
create or replace sequence my_master_key;PL/SQL code...
DECLARE
as_master_key number;
as_project_name varchar2(20) := 'CMDEMO';
as_database_site varchar2(20) := 'CMPL';
as_user_initials varckar2(5) := 'SK';
as_table varchar2(30) := 'SUBMITTAL_CATEGORY';
BEGIN
select my_master_key.nextval
into as_master_key
from dual;
-- In 11g you could replace this select with just:
-- as_master_key = my_master_key.nextval;
END;This get's a unique sequence value into a variable and declares all the other variables. What you want to do with them after that I don't know.

Database independant ETL in ODI for SQL Server and Oracle

Hi,
We have a requirement to create ETL which can be run for both SQL Server and Oracle.
We have some tables to be filled from operational database to data warehouse using business requirement.Our goal is to create code which should be database independant.
We will provide all DB details at the start of execution and it will code for as per provided details.
The same can be achieved by Talend.
I wanted to know if same can be achieved in ODI.
Any pointers regarding this would be helpful.
Thanks,
Mahesh

A quick trick: Provide one more value at the start of execution. It is something like a flag. For example db_flag. It can be either 'O' or 'S'.
Open both oracle and sql server KM. Copy one of the KM code to other KM and put an if condition to check the flag.
if (#DB_FLAG.equalsTo("O")){
Oracle code goes here...........
}else{
SQL Server code goes here...........
Its a pure KM customization.
Bhabani
http://dwteam.in

SQL*Plus and Oracle 9i Lite

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for