Sql query slow from application but executes in 1 min in Toad
Hello,
When I execute a big select query from DB itself , it gives results in a min.
But when called from .Net application it takes 10 mins to execute.
But after trying to excute no of times, it suddenly works faster sometimes.
Hello,
When I execute a big select query from DB itself , it gives results in a min.
But when called from .Net application it takes 10 mins to execute.
But after trying to excute no of times, it suddenly works faster sometimes.
Similar Messages
-
Sql query slowness due to rank and columns with null values:
Sql query slowness due to rank and columns with null values:
I have the following table in database with around 10 millions records:
Declaration:
create table PropertyOwners (
[Key] int not null primary key,
PropertyKey int not null,
BoughtDate DateTime,
OwnerKey int null,
GroupKey int null
go
[Key] is primary key and combination of PropertyKey, BoughtDate, OwnerKey and GroupKey is unique.
With the following index:
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_PropertyOwners] ON [dbo].[PropertyOwners]
[PropertyKey] ASC,
[BoughtDate] DESC,
[OwnerKey] DESC,
[GroupKey] DESC
go
Description of the case:
For single BoughtDate one property can belong to multiple owners or single group, for single record there can either be OwnerKey or GroupKey but not both so one of them will be null for each record. I am trying to retrieve the data from the table using
following query for the OwnerKey. If there are same property rows for owners and group at the same time than the rows having OwnerKey with be preferred, that is why I am using "OwnerKey desc" in Rank function.
declare @ownerKey int = 40000
select PropertyKey, BoughtDate, OwnerKey, GroupKey
from (
select PropertyKey, BoughtDate, OwnerKey, GroupKey,
RANK() over (partition by PropertyKey order by BoughtDate desc, OwnerKey desc, GroupKey desc) as [Rank]
from PropertyOwners
) as result
where result.[Rank]=1 and result.[OwnerKey]=@ownerKey
It is taking 2-3 seconds to get the records which is too slow, similar time it is taking as I try to get the records using the GroupKey. But when I tried to get the records for the PropertyKey with the same query, it is executing in 10 milliseconds.
May be the slowness is due to as OwnerKey/GroupKey in the table can be null and sql server in unable to index it. I have also tried to use the Indexed view to pre ranked them but I can't use it in my query as Rank function is not supported in indexed
view.
Please note this table is updated once a day and using Sql Server 2008 R2. Any help will be greatly appreciated.create table #result (PropertyKey int not null, BoughtDate datetime, OwnerKey int null, GroupKey int null, [Rank] int not null)Create index idx ON #result(OwnerKey ,rnk)
insert into #result(PropertyKey, BoughtDate, OwnerKey, GroupKey, [Rank])
select PropertyKey, BoughtDate, OwnerKey, GroupKey,
RANK() over (partition by PropertyKey order by BoughtDate desc, OwnerKey desc, GroupKey desc) as [Rank]
from PropertyOwners
go
declare @ownerKey int = 1
select PropertyKey, BoughtDate, OwnerKey, GroupKey
from #result as result
where result.[Rank]=1
and result.[OwnerKey]=@ownerKey
go
Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
MS SQL Consulting:
Large scale of database and data cleansing
Remote DBA Services:
Improves MS SQL Database Performance
SQL Server Integration Services:
Business Intelligence -
Sql query slow in new redhat enviornment
We just migrated to a new dev environment in Linux REDHAT5, and now the query is very slow, and I used the TOAD to run the query, it took like 700 msecond to finish, however from any server connection, the sql query takes hours to finish.
I checked toad monitor, it said need to increase db_buffer_cache and shared pool too small.
Also three red alert from toad is:
1. Library Cache get hit ratio: Dynamic or unsharable sql
2. Chained fetch ratio: PCT free too low for a table
3. parse to execute ratio: HIgh parse to execute ratio.
App team said it ran real quick in the old AIX system, however I ran it in old system, and monitored in the toad, it gave me all same 5 red alerts in old system, and it did provide query results a lot quicker though.
Here is the parameters in the old system (11gr1 on AIX):
SQL> show parameter target
NAME TYPE VALUE
-------------------------------- archive_lag_target integer 0
db_flashback_retention_target integer 1440
fast_start_io_target integer 0
fast_start_mttr_target integer 0
memory_max_target big integer 0
memory_target big integer 0
pga_aggregate_target big integer 278928K
sga_target big integer 0
SQL> show parameter shared
NAME TYPE VALUE
-------------------------------- hi_shared_memory_address integer 0
max_shared_servers integer
shared_memory_address integer 0
shared_pool_reserved_size big integer 31876710
shared_pool_size big integer 608M
shared_server_sessions integer
shared_servers integer 0
SQL> show parameter db_buffer
SQL> show parameter buffer
NAME TYPE VALUE
-------------------------------- buffer_pool_keep string
buffer_pool_recycle string
db_block_buffers integer 0
log_buffer integer 2048000
use_indirect_data_buffers boolean FALSE
SQL>
In new 11gr2 Linux REDHAT parameter:
NAME TYPE VALUE
----------- archive_lag_target integer 0
db_flashback_retention_target integer 1440
fast_start_io_target integer 0
fast_start_mttr_target integer 0
memory_max_target big integer 2512M
memory_target big integer 2512M
parallel_servers_target integer 192
pga_aggregate_target big integer 0
sga_target big integer 1648M
SQL> show parameter shared
NAME TYPE VALUE
----------- hi_shared_memory_address integer 0
max_shared_servers integer
shared_memory_address integer 0
shared_pool_reserved_size big integer 28M
shared_pool_size big integer 0
shared_server_sessions integer
shared_servers integer 1
SQL> show parameter buffer
NAME TYPE VALUE
----------- buffer_pool_keep string
buffer_pool_recycle string
db_block_buffers integer 0
log_buffer integer 18857984
use_indirect_data_buffers boolean FALSE
SQL>
Please help. Thanks in advance.846422 wrote:
why need ddl? we have a sql query slow.The DDL shows the physical structure of the table and physical storage characteristics. All relevant in performance tuning.
As for the SQL query being slow. It is not.
You have not provided any evidence that it is slow. And no, comparing performance with a totally different system is not a valid baseline for comparison. (most cars have 4 wheels, a gearbox and a steering wheel - but that does not mean you can compare different cars like a VW Beetle with a VW Porsche)
What is slow? What are the biggest wait states for the SQL? What does the execution plan say?
You have not defined a problem - you identified a symptom called "+query is slow+". You need to diagnose the condition by determining exactly what the SQL qeury is doing in the database. (and please, do not use TOAD and similar tools in an attempt to do this - do it properly instead) -
[SOLVED]overriding VO's SQL query in an application module
Hi, can anybody help me in searching examples of everriding some aspects of VO in an application module.
As i learned we can override, for example the "WHERE" clause of an VO's SQL query in different application modules, using as i supply the addWhereClause method on SomeViewObjImpl object.
... but are there any examples of using this possibility? Should i create a custom method in application module java class?
Thanks in advance. Best Regards.Alex.
Message was edited by:
Timin
Message was edited by:
TiminHi, can anybody help me in searching examples of everriding some aspects of VO in an application module.
As i learned we can override, for example the "WHERE" clause of an VO's SQL query in different application modules, using as i supply the addWhereClause method on SomeViewObjImpl object.
... but are there any examples of using this possibility? Should i create a custom method in application module java class?
Thanks in advance. Best Regards.Alex.
Message was edited by:
Timin
Message was edited by:
Timin -
SQL query slow with call to function
I have a SQL query that will return in less than a second or two with a function in-line selected in the "from" clause of the statement. As soon as I select that returned value in the SQL statement, the statement takes from anywhere from 2 to 5 minutes to return. Here is a simplified sample from the statement:
This statement returns in a second or 2.
select A.pk_id
from stu_schedule A, stu_school B, stu_year C, school_year D,
(select calc_ytd_class_abs2(Z.PK_ID,'U') ytd_unx
from stu_schedule Z) II
where B.pk_id = A.fk_stu_school
and C.pk_id = B.fk_stu_year
and D.pk_id = C.year
and D.school_year = '2011';
if I add this function call in, the statement runs extremely poor.
select A.pk_id,
II.ytd_unx
from stu_schedule A, stu_school B, stu_year C, school_year D,
(select calc_ytd_class_abs2(Z.PK_ID,'U') ytd_unx
from stu_schedule Z) II
where B.pk_id = A.fk_stu_school
and C.pk_id = B.fk_stu_year
and D.pk_id = C.year
and D.school_year = '2011';
Here is the function that is called:
create or replace FUNCTION calc_ytd_class_abs2 (p_fk_stu_schedule in varchar2,
p_legality in varchar2) return number IS
l_days_absent number := 0;
CURSOR get_class_abs IS
select (select nvl(max(D.days_absent),'0')
from cut_code D
where D.pk_id = C.fk_cut_code
and (D.legality = p_legality
or p_legality = '%')) days_absent
from stu_schedule_detail B, stu_class_attendance C
where B.fk_stu_schedule = p_fk_stu_schedule
and C.fk_stu_schedule_detail = B.pk_id;
BEGIN
FOR x in get_class_abs LOOP
l_days_absent := l_days_absent + x.days_absent;
END LOOP;
return (l_days_absent);
END calc_ytd_class_abs2;Query returns anywhere from 6000 to 32000 rows. For each of those rows a parameter is passed in to 4 different functions to get ytd totals. When I call the functions in the in-line view but do not select from them in the main SQL, the report (oh, this is Application Express 4.0 interactive reports, just an FYI) runs fast. The report comes back in a few seconds. But when I select from the in-line view to display those ytd totals, the report runs extremely slow. I know there are the articles about context switching and how mixing SQL with PL/SQL performs poorly. So I tried a pipeline table function where the function for the ytd totals populate the columns of the pipeline table and I select from the pipeline table in the SQL query in the interactive report. That seemed to perform a little worse from what I can tell.
Thanks for any help you can offer. -
SQL query slow when issued by app, fast when issued mnaually
Hi there,
I have a more general question about a specific Oracle behaviour.
I update a feature from within an application. The application doesn't respond and I finally have to terminate it. I checked Oracle whether a query is running long using the following statement:
select s.username,s.sid,s.serial#,s.last_call_et/60 mins_running,q.sql_text from v$session s
join v$sqltext_with_newlines q
on s.sql_address = q.address
where status='ACTIVE'
and type <>'BACKGROUND'
and last_call_et> 60
order by sid,serial#,q.piece
The result of the above query is:
WITH CONNECTION AS ( SELECT * FROM WW_CONN C WHERE (C.FID_FROM I
N (SELECT FID FROM WW_LINE WHERE FID_ATTR=:B1 ) AND C.F_CLASS_ID
FROM =22) OR (C.FIDTO IN (SELECT FID FROM WW_LINE WHERE FID_AT
TR=:B1 ) AND C.F_CLASS_ID_TO =22) ) SELECT MIN(P.FID_ATTR) AS FI
D_FROM FROM CONNECTION C, WW_POINT P WHERE (P.FID = C.FID_FROM A
ND C.F_CLASS_ID_FROM = 32 AND C.FLOW = 1) OR (P.FID = C.FID_TO A
ND C.F_CLASS_ID_TO = 32 AND C.FLOW = 2)
I have a different tool which shows me the binding parameter values. So I know that the value for :B1 is 5011 - the id of the feature being updated. This query runs for 20 mins and longer before it eventually stops. The update process involves multiple sql statements - so this one is not doing the update but is part of the process.
Here is the bit I do not understand: when I run the query in SQL Developer with value 5011 for :B1 it takes 0.5 secs to return a result.
Why is it, that the sql statement takes so long when issued by the application but takes less than a second when I run it manually?
I sent a dump of the data to the application vendor who is not able to reproduce the issue in their environment. Could someone explain to me what happens here or give me some keywords for further research?
We are using 11gR2, 64bit.
Many thanks,
RobHi Rob,
at least you should see some differences in the statistics for the different child cursor (the one for the execution in the application should show at least a higher value for ELAPSED_TIME). I would use something like the following query to check the information for the child cursors:
select sql_id
, PLAN_HASH_VALUE
, CHILD_NUMBER
, EXECUTIONS
, ELAPSED_TIME
, USER_IO_WAIT_TIME
, CONCURRENCY_WAIT_TIME
, DISK_READS
, BUFFER_GETS
, ROWS_PROCESSED
from v$sql
where sql_id = your_sql_idRegards
Martin -
SQL Query failure in application involving GP
Hi,
In one of the WDJ applications I am using, there is creation of GP instance involved and within the callable object of GP, back end connectivity is obtained through RFC. This application is not working properly and when I took traces of the same, I could find out that all transactions are failing at a particular query which looks like this.
Backends|ggp|adhn5362-1527(Oracle DB)|SQL|Prepared|Query|Select* from "CAF_GP_USRHSH" WHERE "HASHVALUE"=?
I can see such queries wherever back end connectivity is involved. Has any one faced such error before? Is this due to some authorization issues?
Helpful answers will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Shifa<< Do not post the same question across a number of forums >>
-
Sql query slow due to case statement on Joins
Hi
The sql query runs very slow for 30 min when the below case statement is added on the joins. Could you please let me know how to tune it. if the case statement is not there then it runs only for 1 min.
*( CASE*
WHEN PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2 <> '1000'
THEN PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT1 || PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2 || '_' || NVL(PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT6,'000')
WHEN DT_REQ_ALL.EMPMGMTCD IS NOT NULL AND
PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2 = '1000'
THEN DT_REQ_ALL.EMPMGMTCD
END =DB2.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V.MH_CHILD )
SELECT DISTINCT
D.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V.RC_PARENT,
DT_REQ_ALL.FULL_NAME,
DT_REQ_ALL.EMP_COMPANY_CODE,
DT_REQ_ALL.EMP_COST_CENTER,
PO.PO_VENDORS.VENDOR_NAME,
PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.SEGMENT1,
PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE,
PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT1,
PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2,
PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CURRENCY_CODE,
PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_NUM,
PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_DATE,
(PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_AMOUNT* PO_Rates_GL_DR.CONVERSION_RATE),
(NVL(to_number(PO_DIST_ALL.AMOUNT_BILLED),0) * PO_Rates_GL_DR.CONVERSION_RATE),
PO_LINES_LOC.LINE_NUM,
GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS.NAME,
CASE
WHEN TRUNC(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE) > PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_DATE
THEN 1
ELSE 0
END ,
PO.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL.LINE_LOCATION_ID,
TRUNC(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE,'WW') + 8 WEEK_Ending
FROM
DB2.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V,
PO.PO_VENDORS,
PO.PO_HEADERS_ALL PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2,
GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB,
AP.AP_INVOICES_ALL PO_INV_DIST_ALL,
PO.PO_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL PO_DIST_ALL,
PO.PO_LINES_ALL PO_LINES_LOC,
GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS,
PO.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL,
PO.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_ALL,
AP.AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL PO_DIST_INV_DIST_ALL,
APPS.HR_OPERATING_UNITS,
PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL,
SELECT DISTINCT
PO_RDA.DISTRIBUTION_ID,
PO_RLA.requisition_line_id,
PO_RHA.DESCRIPTION PO_Descr,
PO_RHA.NOTE_TO_AUTHORIZER PO_Justification,
Req_Emp.FULL_NAME,
GL_CC.SEGMENT1 Req_Company_Code,
GL_CC.SEGMENT2 Req_Cost_Center,
Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT1 Emp_Company_Code,
Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT2 Emp_Cost_Center,
(Case
When GL_CC.SEGMENT2 <> 8000
Then TRUNC(GL_CC.SEGMENT1) || TRUNC(GL_CC.SEGMENT2) || '_' || NVL(GL_CC.SEGMENT6,'000')
Else TRUNC(Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT1) || TRUNC(Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT2) || '_' || NVL(Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT6,'000')
End) EmpMgmtCD
FROM
PO.po_requisition_lines_all PO_rla,
PO.po_requisition_headers_all PO_rha,
PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL po_RDA,
GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS gl_cc,
HR.PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F Req_Emp,
HR.PER_ALL_ASSIGNMENTS_F Req_Emp_Assign,
HR.hr_all_organization_units Req_Emp_Org,
HR.pay_cost_allocation_keyflex Req_Emp_CC
WHERE
PO_RDA.CODE_COMBINATION_ID = GL_CC.CODE_COMBINATION_ID and
PO_RLA.REQUISITION_LINE_ID = PO_RDA.REQUISITION_LINE_ID AND
PO_RLA.to_person_id = Req_Emp.PERSON_ID AND
PO_RLA.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = PO_RHA.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID AND
(trunc(PO_rla.CREATION_DATE) between Req_Emp.effective_start_date and Req_Emp.effective_end_date OR
Req_Emp.effective_start_date IS NULL) AND
Req_Emp.PERSON_ID = Req_Emp_Assign.PERSON_ID AND
Req_Emp_Assign.organization_id = Req_Emp_Org.organization_id AND
(trunc(PO_rla.CREATION_DATE) between Req_Emp_Assign.effective_start_date and Req_Emp_Assign.effective_end_date OR
Req_Emp_Assign.effective_start_date IS NULL) AND
Req_Emp_Assign.primary_flag = 'Y' AND
Req_Emp_Assign.assignment_type = 'E' AND
Req_Emp_Org.cost_allocation_keyflex_id = Req_Emp_CC.cost_allocation_keyflex_id
) DT_REQ_ALL,
SELECT
FROM_CURRENCY,
TO_CURRENCY,
CONVERSION_DATE,
CONVERSION_RATE
FROM GL.GL_DAILY_RATES
UNION
SELECT Distinct
'USD',
'USD',
CONVERSION_DATE,
1
FROM GL.GL_DAILY_RATES
) PO_Rates_GL_DR
WHERE
( PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.CODE_COMBINATION_ID=PO_DIST_ALL.CODE_COMBINATION_ID )
AND ( PO_DIST_ALL.LINE_LOCATION_ID=PO.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_ALL.LINE_LOCATION_ID )
AND ( PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.VENDOR_ID=PO.PO_VENDORS.VENDOR_ID )
AND ( PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.ORG_ID=APPS.HR_OPERATING_UNITS.ORGANIZATION_ID )
AND ( GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID=APPS.HR_OPERATING_UNITS.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID )
AND ( PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CURRENCY_CODE=PO_Rates_GL_DR.FROM_CURRENCY )
AND ( trunc(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE)=PO_Rates_GL_DR.CONVERSION_DATE )
AND ( PO_DIST_ALL.REQ_DISTRIBUTION_ID=PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL.DISTRIBUTION_ID(+) )
AND ( PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL.REQUISITION_LINE_ID=PO.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL.REQUISITION_LINE_ID(+) )
AND ( PO_LINES_LOC.PO_HEADER_ID=PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.PO_HEADER_ID )
AND ( PO.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_ALL.PO_LINE_ID=PO_LINES_LOC.PO_LINE_ID )
AND ( PO_DIST_ALL.REQ_DISTRIBUTION_ID=DT_REQ_ALL.DISTRIBUTION_ID(+) )
AND ( PO_DIST_ALL.PO_DISTRIBUTION_ID=PO_DIST_INV_DIST_ALL.PO_DISTRIBUTION_ID(+) )
AND ( PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_ID(+)=PO_DIST_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_ID )
AND ( PO_INV_DIST_ALL.SOURCE(+) <> 'XML GATEWAY' )
AND
( NVL(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CANCEL_FLAG,'N') <> 'Y' )
AND
( NVL(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CLOSED_CODE, 'OPEN') <> 'FINALLY CLOSED' )
AND
( NVL(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.AUTHORIZATION_STATUS,'IN PROCESS') <> 'REJECTED' )
AND
( TRUNC(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE) BETWEEN TO_DATE('01-jan-2011') AND TO_DATE('04-jan-2011') )
AND
PO_Rates_GL_DR.TO_CURRENCY = 'USD'
AND
DB2.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V.RC_PARENT In ( 'Unavailable','Corp','Commercial' )
AND
( CASE
WHEN PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2 <> '1000'
THEN PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT1 || PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2 || '_' || NVL(PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT6,'000')
WHEN DT_REQ_ALL.EMPMGMTCD IS NOT NULL AND
PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2 = '1000'
THEN DT_REQ_ALL.EMPMGMTCD
END =DB2.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V.MH_CHILD )Explain plan. sorry can't get the explain plan from sql. this is from toad.
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 53,932 Bytes: 2,607 Cardinality: 1
79 HASH UNIQUE Cost: 53,932 Bytes: 2,607 Cardinality: 1
78 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 53,931 Bytes: 2,607 Cardinality: 1
75 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 53,928 Bytes: 2,560 Cardinality: 1
72 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 53,902 Bytes: 2,552 Cardinality: 1
69 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 53,900 Bytes: 2,533 Cardinality: 1
66 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 53,898 Bytes: 2,521 Cardinality: 1
63 HASH JOIN OUTER Cost: 53,896 Bytes: 2,509 Cardinality: 1
40 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL Cost: 3 Bytes: 26 Cardinality: 1
39 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 17,076 Bytes: 2,400 Cardinality: 1
37 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 17,073 Bytes: 2,374 Cardinality: 1
34 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 17,070 Bytes: 2,362 Cardinality: 1
31 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 17,066 Bytes: 2,347 Cardinality: 1
29 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 17,066 Bytes: 2,339 Cardinality: 1
26 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 17,065 Bytes: 2,312 Cardinality: 1
23 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 17,064 Bytes: 2,287 Cardinality: 1
20 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 17,062 Bytes: 2,261 Cardinality: 1
17 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 17,056 Bytes: 6,678 Cardinality: 3
15 HASH JOIN Cost: 17,056 Bytes: 6,663 Cardinality: 3
13 MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN Cost: 135 Bytes: 30,352 Cardinality: 14
5 VIEW VIEW DB2.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V Cost: 4 Bytes: 2,128 Cardinality: 1
4 SORT UNIQUE Cost: 4 Cardinality: 1
3 UNION-ALL
1 REMOTE REMOTE SERIAL_FROM_REMOTE PRDFDW.WORLD
2 FAST DUAL Cost: 3 Cardinality: 1
12 BUFFER SORT Cost: 135 Bytes: 560 Cardinality: 14
11 VIEW DB2. Cost: 131 Bytes: 560 Cardinality: 14
10 SORT UNIQUE Cost: 131 Bytes: 310 Cardinality: 14
9 UNION-ALL
7 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GL.GL_DAILY_RATES Cost: 65 Bytes: 270 Cardinality: 9
6 INDEX SKIP SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GL.GL_DAILY_RATES_U1 Cost: 64 Cardinality: 1
8 INDEX SKIP SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GL.GL_DAILY_RATES_U1 Cost: 64 Bytes: 4,368 Cardinality: 546
14 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE PO.PO_HEADERS_ALL Cost: 16,920 Bytes: 32,754 Cardinality: 618
16 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_PK Cost: 0 Bytes: 5 Cardinality: 1
19 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION Cost: 2 Bytes: 35 Cardinality: 1
18 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATIO_FK2 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 2
22 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION Cost: 2 Bytes: 26 Cardinality: 1
21 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATIO_FK2 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
25 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS Cost: 1 Bytes: 25 Cardinality: 1
24 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
28 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_VENDORS Cost: 1 Bytes: 27 Cardinality: 1
27 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) PO.PO_VENDORS_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
30 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNTS_TL_PK Cost: 0 Bytes: 8 Cardinality: 1
33 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_LINES_ALL Cost: 4 Bytes: 60 Cardinality: 4
32 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) PO.PO_LINES_U2 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 4
36 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_ALL Cost: 3 Bytes: 12 Cardinality: 1
35 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX PO.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_N1 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
38 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX PO.PO_DISTRIBUTIONS_N1 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
62 VIEW DB2. Cost: 36,819 Bytes: 1,090 Cardinality: 10
61 HASH UNIQUE Cost: 36,819 Bytes: 2,580 Cardinality: 10
60 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 36,818 Bytes: 2,580 Cardinality: 10
57 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 36,798 Bytes: 2,390 Cardinality: 10
54 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 36,768 Bytes: 2,220 Cardinality: 10
51 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 36,758 Bytes: 1,510 Cardinality: 10
48 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 36,747 Bytes: 1,050 Cardinality: 10
45 HASH JOIN Cost: 36,737 Bytes: 960 Cardinality: 10
43 HASH JOIN Cost: 34,602 Bytes: 230,340 Cardinality: 3,490
41 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE HR.PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F Cost: 1,284 Bytes: 1,848,420 Cardinality: 44,010
42 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE PO.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL Cost: 31,802 Bytes: 18,340,080 Cardinality: 764,170
44 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE HR.PER_ALL_ASSIGNMENTS_F Cost: 2,134 Bytes: 822,540 Cardinality: 27,418
47 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE HR.HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS Cost: 1 Bytes: 9 Cardinality: 1
46 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.HR_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_PK Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
50 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE HR.PAY_COST_ALLOCATION_KEYFLEX Cost: 1 Bytes: 46 Cardinality: 1
49 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) HR.PAY_COST_ALLOCATION_KEYFLE_PK Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
53 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS_ALL Cost: 1 Bytes: 71 Cardinality: 1
52 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) PO.PO_REQUISITION_HEADERS_U1 Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1
56 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL Cost: 3 Bytes: 17 Cardinality: 1
55 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_N1 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1
59 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS Cost: 2 Bytes: 19 Cardinality: 1
58 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
65 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL Cost: 2 Bytes: 12 Cardinality: 1
64 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
68 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE PO.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL Cost: 2 Bytes: 12 Cardinality: 1
67 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) PO.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
71 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS Cost: 2 Bytes: 19 Cardinality: 1
70 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_U1 Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
74 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AP.AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL Cost: 26 Bytes: 16 Cardinality: 2
73 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX AP.AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_N7 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 37
77 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE AP.AP_INVOICES_ALL Cost: 3 Bytes: 47 Cardinality: 1
76 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) AP.AP_INVOICES_U1 Cost: 2 Cardinality: 1 ThanksForming a new table "new_table" with 3 tables which particiapate in CASE statement logic.
with DT_REQ_ALL as
SELECT DISTINCT
PO_RDA.DISTRIBUTION_ID,
PO_RLA.requisition_line_id,
PO_RHA.DESCRIPTION PO_Descr,
PO_RHA.NOTE_TO_AUTHORIZER PO_Justification,
Req_Emp.FULL_NAME,
GL_CC.SEGMENT1 Req_Company_Code,
GL_CC.SEGMENT2 Req_Cost_Center,
Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT1 Emp_Company_Code,
Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT2 Emp_Cost_Center,
(Case
When GL_CC.SEGMENT2 8000
Then TRUNC(GL_CC.SEGMENT1) || TRUNC(GL_CC.SEGMENT2) || '_' || NVL(GL_CC.SEGMENT6,'000')
Else TRUNC(Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT1) || TRUNC(Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT2) || '_' || NVL(Req_Emp_CC.SEGMENT6,'000')
End) EmpMgmtCD
FROM
PO.po_requisition_lines_all PO_rla,
PO.po_requisition_headers_all PO_rha,
PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL po_RDA,
GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS gl_cc,
HR.PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F Req_Emp,
HR.PER_ALL_ASSIGNMENTS_F Req_Emp_Assign,
HR.hr_all_organization_units Req_Emp_Org,
HR.pay_cost_allocation_keyflex Req_Emp_CC
WHERE
PO_RDA.CODE_COMBINATION_ID = GL_CC.CODE_COMBINATION_ID and
PO_RLA.REQUISITION_LINE_ID = PO_RDA.REQUISITION_LINE_ID AND
PO_RLA.to_person_id = Req_Emp.PERSON_ID AND
PO_RLA.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID = PO_RHA.REQUISITION_HEADER_ID AND
(trunc(PO_rla.CREATION_DATE) between Req_Emp.effective_start_date and Req_Emp.effective_end_date OR
Req_Emp.effective_start_date IS NULL) AND
Req_Emp.PERSON_ID = Req_Emp_Assign.PERSON_ID AND
Req_Emp_Assign.organization_id = Req_Emp_Org.organization_id AND
(trunc(PO_rla.CREATION_DATE) between Req_Emp_Assign.effective_start_date and Req_Emp_Assign.effective_end_date OR
Req_Emp_Assign.effective_start_date IS NULL) AND
Req_Emp_Assign.primary_flag = 'Y' AND
Req_Emp_Assign.assignment_type = 'E' AND
Req_Emp_Org.cost_allocation_keyflex_id = Req_Emp_CC.cost_allocation_keyflex_id
SELECT DISTINCT
D.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V.RC_PARENT,
DT_REQ_ALL.FULL_NAME,
DT_REQ_ALL.EMP_COMPANY_CODE,
DT_REQ_ALL.EMP_COST_CENTER,
PO.PO_VENDORS.VENDOR_NAME,
PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.SEGMENT1,
PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE,
PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT1,
PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2,
PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CURRENCY_CODE,
PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_NUM,
PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_DATE,
(PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_AMOUNT* PO_Rates_GL_DR.CONVERSION_RATE),
(NVL(to_number(PO_DIST_ALL.AMOUNT_BILLED),0) * PO_Rates_GL_DR.CONVERSION_RATE),
PO_LINES_LOC.LINE_NUM,
GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS.NAME,
CASE
WHEN TRUNC(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE) > PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_DATE
THEN 1
ELSE 0
END ,
PO.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL.LINE_LOCATION_ID,
TRUNC(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE,'WW') + 8 WEEK_Ending
FROM
( SELECT * FROM
DB2.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V,
GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB,
DT_REQ_ALL
WHERE
DB2.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V.RC_PARENT In ( 'Unavailable','Corp','Commercial' )
AND
CASE
WHEN PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2 <> '1000'
THEN PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT1 || PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2 || '_' || NVL(PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT6,'000')
WHEN DT_REQ_ALL.EMPMGMTCD IS NOT NULL AND
PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.SEGMENT2 = '1000'
THEN DT_REQ_ALL.EMPMGMTCD
END =DB2.DB2_FDW_MGMT_V.MH_CHILD
) new_table,
PO.PO_VENDORS,
PO.PO_HEADERS_ALL PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2,
AP.AP_INVOICES_ALL PO_INV_DIST_ALL,
PO.PO_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL PO_DIST_ALL,
PO.PO_LINES_ALL PO_LINES_LOC,
GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS,
PO.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL,
PO.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_ALL,
AP.AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL PO_DIST_INV_DIST_ALL,
APPS.HR_OPERATING_UNITS,
PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL,
SELECT
FROM_CURRENCY,
TO_CURRENCY,
CONVERSION_DATE,
CONVERSION_RATE
FROM GL.GL_DAILY_RATES
UNION
SELECT Distinct
'USD',
'USD',
CONVERSION_DATE,
1
FROM GL.GL_DAILY_RATES
) PO_Rates_GL_DR
WHERE
( PO_DIST_GL_CODE_COMB.CODE_COMBINATION_ID=PO_DIST_ALL.CODE_COMBINATION_ID )
AND ( PO_DIST_ALL.LINE_LOCATION_ID=PO.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_ALL.LINE_LOCATION_ID )
AND ( PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.VENDOR_ID=PO.PO_VENDORS.VENDOR_ID )
AND ( PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.ORG_ID=APPS.HR_OPERATING_UNITS.ORGANIZATION_ID )
AND ( GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID=APPS.HR_OPERATING_UNITS.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID )
AND ( PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CURRENCY_CODE=PO_Rates_GL_DR.FROM_CURRENCY )
AND ( trunc(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE)=PO_Rates_GL_DR.CONVERSION_DATE )
AND ( PO_DIST_ALL.REQ_DISTRIBUTION_ID=PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL.DISTRIBUTION_ID(+) )
AND ( PO.PO_REQ_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL.REQUISITION_LINE_ID=PO.PO_REQUISITION_LINES_ALL.REQUISITION_LINE_ID(+) )
AND ( PO_LINES_LOC.PO_HEADER_ID=PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.PO_HEADER_ID )
AND ( PO.PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_ALL.PO_LINE_ID=PO_LINES_LOC.PO_LINE_ID )
AND ( PO_DIST_ALL.REQ_DISTRIBUTION_ID=DT_REQ_ALL.DISTRIBUTION_ID(+) )
AND ( PO_DIST_ALL.PO_DISTRIBUTION_ID=PO_DIST_INV_DIST_ALL.PO_DISTRIBUTION_ID(+) )
AND ( PO_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_ID(+)=PO_DIST_INV_DIST_ALL.INVOICE_ID )
AND ( PO_INV_DIST_ALL.SOURCE(+) 'XML GATEWAY' )
AND
( NVL(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CANCEL_FLAG,'N') 'Y' )
AND
( NVL(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CLOSED_CODE, 'OPEN') 'FINALLY CLOSED' )
AND
( NVL(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.AUTHORIZATION_STATUS,'IN PROCESS') 'REJECTED' )
AND
( TRUNC(PO_PO_HEADERS_ALL2.CREATION_DATE) BETWEEN TO_DATE('01-jan-2011') AND TO_DATE('04-jan-2011') )
AND
PO_Rates_GL_DR.TO_CURRENCY = 'USD'
-
Email SQL query results from powershell
I currently have a script that I run every half hour which runs an sql query, and takes the results, and emails them to a group of users. The script states how many faxes are in a faxmaker queue. Now, the powers that be would like to add additional
information, and I wanted to know how to include the additional information in my query. So, here is the script that is working. I've changed some information to protect the innocent.
$DATETIME = Get-Date -Format "MM-dd-yyyy [HH:mm:ss]";
##### CREATE A LOG FILE AND INSERT A LOG HEADING ;
$LOG_HEADING = "SHOW FLORIDA INBOUND FAX QUEUES RAN @: " + $DATETIME ;
Add-Content "E:\psh\LiveScripts\logs\SHOW-FLORIDA-INBOUND-FAX-QUEUE.TXT" $LOG_HEADING ;
# get sql dbname sample
#email variables
$EmailFrom = "[email protected]" ;
$EmailTo = "My Email List"
$SqlServer = "MY-SQL-SERVER"
$SqlCatalog = "FAXmakerArchive"
$SqlConnection = New-Object System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection
$SqlConnection.ConnectionString = "Server = $SqlServer; Database = $SqlCatalog; Integrated Security = True"
$SqlConnection.Open()
$SqlCmd = New-Object System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand
$SqlCmd.CommandText = "SELECT count (DISTINCT fax.ID) DATONA_BEACH_FAX_COUNT FROM
FM_FAXIN fax WITH (NOLOCK) LEFT OUTER JOIN T_FAX_REVIEW rvw WITH (NOLOCK) ON fax.ID = rvw.IDN_FAX WHERE (fax.RESULT LIKE '%SUCCESS%' OR (fax.RESULT NOT LIKE '%SUCCESS%' AND ATTACH_COUNT > 0)) AND
ISNULL(rvw.BOOL_IS_COMPLETE, 0) = 0 AND fax.LINE IN (SELECT LINE FROM T_LOCATION_FAX_LINE lne WITH (NOLOCK) WHERE lne.CDE_ACTIVE_FLAG = 1 AND lne.IDN_LOCATION =
3) AND fax.DATE > '2013-09-25' "
$SqlCmd.Connection = $SqlConnection
$NumberOfFlaInboundFaxes = $SqlCmd.ExecuteScalar()
$SqlConnection.Close()
if( $NumberOfFlaInboundFaxes -gt 29)
#Email Body
$EmailBody = @"
There are currently $NumberOfFlaInboundFaxes Faxes in the Florida Inbound Fax Queue ( )`n
Please Log in and help clear the Queue. Thank you. `n
`n`n`n
The people who recieved this email are: $EmailTo`n`n`n
From ApexAdmin/SystemScheduler
$EmailSubject = "There are " + $NumberOfFlaInboundFaxes + " faxes in the Inbound Florida Fax Queue. " + $DATETIME ;
#End of Email Body
#send mail via gmail through powersehll
$SMTPServer = "smtp.gmail.com"
$SMTPClient = New-Object Net.Mail.SmtpClient($SmtpServer, 587)
$SMTPClient.EnableSsl = $true
$SMTPClient.Credentials = New-Object System.Net.NetworkCredential("email user", "email password");
$SMTPClient.Send($EmailFrom, $EmailTo, $EmailSubject , $EmailBody)
Else
Write-Host "NO ALERT on $DATETIME `n" -foreground 'DARKGREEN' -background 'WHITE' ;
#Write-output "There are currently: " $NumberOfFlaInboundFaxes " Faxes in the Florida Fax Queue"
Write-Host "There are currently " $NumberOfFlaInboundFaxes " Files in the Florida fax queue" -foreground 'DarkBLUE' -background 'white'
Write-Host "SMTP Alert sent to " ( "$EmailTo" ).ToUpper() " on $DATETIME `n" -foreground 'DARKBLUE' -background 'WHITE' ;
write-Host "WROTE AN ENTRY TO THE LOGFILE.`n" -foreground 'DARKGREEN' -background 'WHITE'
Now, I'd like to also include this query... also changed information to protect the innocent.
SELECT u.IDN_USER,
u.NAM_LASDBUSER,
u.NAM_FIRSDBUSER,
r.NAM_ROLE,
COUNT(o.IDN_ORDER) ORDER_CNT,
COUNT(DISTINCT
o.IDN_CLIENT) CLIENDBCNT,
(SELECT IDN_ZONE FROM DBUSER_PREF p WHERE u.IDN_USER = p.IDN_USER) IDN_USER_ZONE
FROM DBORDER o WITH (NOLOCK)
INNER JOIN DBUSER u WITH (NOLOCK)
ON o.IDN_USER_CRTD = u.IDN_USER
INNER JOIN DBROLE r WITH (NOLOCK)
ON u.IDN_ROLE = r.IDN_ROLE
WHERE DATEDIFF(d, GETDATE(), o.DTE_RECORD_CRTD)>=0 AND DATEDIFF(d, GETDATE(), o.DTE_RECORD_CRTD)<=0
AND r.IS_INTERNAL_USER = 1
GROUP BY u.IDN_USER, u.NAM_LASDBUSER, u.NAM_FIRSDBUSER, r.NAM_ROLE, r.IS_INTERNAL_USER
ORDER BY u.NAM_LASDBUSER, u.NAM_FIRSDBUSER
Thank you in advance for any suggestions, links, etc, you can provide. I don't mind doing the heavy lifting, ie: research and reading, just needed to be pointed in the right directions.
JohnAs an example this is more readable but could be improved which would make your adding a section much easier.
$DATETIME = Get-Date -Format 'MM-dd-yyyy [HH:mm:ss]'
$LOG_HEADING = "SHOW FLORIDA INBOUND FAX QUEUES RAN @: " + $DATETIME;
Add-Content "E:\psh\LiveScripts\logs\SHOW-FLORIDA-INBOUND-FAX-QUEUE.TXT" $LOG_HEADING;
$sql = @'
SELECT count(DISTINCT fax.ID) DATONA_BEACH_FAX_COUNT
FROM FM_FAXIN fax WITH (NOLOCK)
LEFT OUTER JOIN T_FAX_REVIEW rvw WITH (NOLOCK) ON fax.ID = rvw.IDN_FAX
WHERE
fax.RESULT LIKE '%SUCCESS%' OR (
fax.RESULT NOT LIKE '%SUCCESS%' AND ATTACH_COUNT > 0
AND ISNULL(rvw.BOOL_IS_COMPLETE, 0) = 0
AND fax.LINE IN (SELECT LINE FROM T_LOCATION_FAX_LINE lne WITH (NOLOCK)
WHERE lne.CDE_ACTIVE_FLAG = 1 AND lne.IDN_LOCATION = 3) AND fax.DATE > '2013-09-25'
$template=@'
There are currently {0} Faxes in the Florida Inbound Fax Queue ( )
Please Log in and help clear the Queue. Thank you.
The people who recieved this email are: $EmailTo
From ApexAdmin/SystemScheduler
$subject= 'There are {0} faxes in the Inbound Florida Fax Queue. {1:MM-dd-yyyy [HH:mm:ss]}'
$EmailFrom='[email protected]'
$EmailTo = "My Email List"
$SqlServer = "MY-SQL-SERVER"
$SqlCatalog = "FAXmakerArchive"
#run query
$SqlConnection = New-Object System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection
$SqlConnection.ConnectionString = "Server = $SqlServer; Database = $SqlCatalog; Integrated Security = True"
$SqlConnection.Open()
$SqlCmd = New-Object System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand
$SqlCmd.CommandText = $sql
$SqlCmd.Connection = $SqlConnection
$NumberOfFlaInboundFaxes = $SqlCmd.ExecuteScalar()
$SqlConnection.Close()
# build email if needed
if($NumberOfFlaInboundFaxes -gt 29){
$EmailBody=$template -f $NumberOfFlaInboundFaxes
$EmailSubject = $subject -f $NumberOfFlaInboundFaxes,[DateTime]::Now
$SMTPServer='smtp.gmail.com"'
$SMTPClient=New-Object Net.Mail.SmtpClient($SmtpServer, 587)
$SMTPClient.EnableSsl = $true
$SMTPClient.Credentials = New-Object System.Net.NetworkCredential("email user", "email password");
$SMTPClient.Send($EmailFrom, $EmailTo, $EmailSubject , $EmailBody)
}else{
Write-Host "NO ALERT on $DATETIME `n" -foreground 'DARKGREEN' -background 'WHITE' ;
Write-Host "There are currently $NumberOfFlaInboundFaxes Files in the Florida fax queue" -foreground 'DarkBLUE' -background 'white'
Write-Host "SMTP Alert sent to $EmailTo on $DATETIME" -foreground 'DARKBLUE' -background 'WHITE' ;
write-Host 'WROTE AN ENTRY TO THE LOGFILE.' -foreground 'DARKGREEN' -background 'WHITE'
\_(ツ)_/ -
MS SQL query slow using view column as criteria
HI,
I am experiencing a very frustrate problem. I have 2 tables, and create a view
to union these 2 tables, when do a select on this view using the column of the
view as criteria is took more 1 minutes, but the query runs fine in Qurey Analyzer.
Anybody has the same experience? is this the problem with jdbc?I searched http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs70/index.html, also searched the documentation
for wls6.1, wls5.1. As you pointed I searched support site, they are all the customer
case, it's not formal documentation.
Joe Weinstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
jen wrote:
Thanks. but I search on the table is fine (the same column). is thereany db setting
could be tuned? so the view is the problem? No, it's a client decision/issue. If you defined your tables to have
nvarchar columns
the jdbc driver's parameter values would be fine as-is.
I searched "useVarChars" on whole
site and can't find anything.Which site? This is a property of the weblogic.jdbc.mssqlserver4.Driver.
I just went to www.bea.com/support and entered useVarChars in the Ask
BEA
question panel and got hits...
Joe
Joe Weinstein <[email protected]> wrote:
Jen wrote:
Sorry it's my bad. I am testing on wls81, but the problems is on wls70,so they
are using different drivers.
You are the magic man. It worked on wls81 now. I am sure it will curethe problem
on wls70. Is there any documentation on this? Why it is not a problemon some
databse server? ThanksSure. The issue has to do with the MS client-DBMS protocol having evolved
from
an 8-bit (7-bit really) character representation. Now it has a newer
16-bit
way, to transfer NVARCHAR data. Java characters are all 16-bit, so
by default
a JDBC driver will send Java parameters over as NVARCHAR data. This
is
crucial
for Japanese data etc. However, once simple ASCII data is transformed
to an
NVARCHAR format, the DBMS can't directly compare it to varchar data,
or use it
in index searches. The DBMS has to convert the VARCHAR data to NVARCHAR,
but it
can't guarantee that the converted data will retain the same ordering
as the index,
so the DBMS has to do a table scan!
The properties I suggested are each driver's way of allowing you
to say "I'm
a simple American ;) I am using simple varchar data so please sendmy
java
strings that way.". This allows the DBMS to use your varchar indexes
in queries.
Joe Weinstein at BEA
Joe Weinstein <[email protected]> wrote:
Jen wrote:
It doesn't cure the problem. Here is my pool
<JDBCConnectionPool DriverName="weblogic.jdbc.sqlserver.SQLServerDriver"Name="test_pool"
Password="{3DES}fKSovViFe5kHzl/vTs0LVQ==" Properties="user=user;PortNumber=1543;useVarChars=true;ServerName=194.20.2.10;DatabaseName=devDB"
Targets="admin" TestTableName="SQL SELECT COUNT(*) FROM sysobjects"URL="jdbc:bea:sqlserver://194.20.2.10:1543"/>
Strange is some database is fine.Oh, sorry. I thought it was the older weblogic driver. Change the
useVarChars=true to sendStringParametersAsUnicode=false
Let me know... Also, I suggest changing the TestTableName to "SQL
select
1".
For MS, that will be much more efficient than involving a full count
of sysobjects!
Joe
Joe Weinstein <[email protected]> wrote:
Jen wrote:
You are right. Tadaa! Am I Kreskin, or what? ;) Here's what I recommend:
In your pool definition, for this driver add a driver property:
useVarChars=true
and let me know if it's all better.
Joe
I am using weblogic jdbc driver weblogic.jdbc.mssqlserver4.Driver.
here is the code:
getData(Connection connection, String stmt, ArrayList arguments)
PreparedStatement pStatement=null;>>>>>>>> ResultSet resultSet=null;>>>>>>>> try {>>>>>>>> pStatement = connection.prepareStatement(stmt);>>>>>>>> for (int i = 1; i <= arguments.size(); i++) {>>>>>>>> pStatement.setString(i, (String) arguments.get(i-1));>>>>>>>> resultSet = pStatement.executeQuery(); //this statement takesmore than 1
min.
Joe Weinstein <[email protected]> wrote:
Jen wrote:
HI,
I am experiencing a very frustrate problem. I have 2 tables,
and
create
a view
to union these 2 tables, when do a select on this view using
the
column
of the
view as criteria is took more 1 minutes, but the query runs
fine
in
Qurey Analyzer.
Anybody has the same experience? is this the problem with jdbc?
I have suspicions... Show me the jdbc code. I'm guessing it's
a
PreparedStatement,
and you send the search criterion column value as a parameter
you
set
with a
setString().... Let me know... (also let me know which jdbc driveryou're
using).
Joe -
Sql query generator from xml data
Hi,
I am looking for an open source tool in java which would generate the sql query with an xml configuration file as input. The xml configuration file schema would be defined by the tool and and would provide placeholders for giving the various information required to build the sql query.
Are there any available?
Please let me know.
Anshukhi All,
I tried below . but still no luck .
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION get_audit_trail_log(cikey IN INTEGER) RETURN blob IS
CURSOR c_log(l_cikey INTEGER) IS
SELECT *
FROM PROD_SOAINFRA.audit_details atr
WHERE cikey = l_cikey
ORDER BY count_id;
bl BLOB;
BEGIN
dbms_lob.createtemporary (bl, TRUE);
FOR r_log IN c_log(cikey)
LOOP
dbms_lob.append (bl,r_log.log);
END LOOP;
RETURN(bl);
END;
=======================================
SELECT UTL_RAW.CAST_TO_VARCHAR2(UTL_COMPRESS.LZ_UNCOMPRESS(get_audit_trail_log(ci.cikey)))
FROM PROD_SOAINFRA.audit_details ci
WHERE cikey = 848063749
=======================================
Error:
=====================
ORA-22835: Buffer too small for CLOB to CHAR or BLOB to RAW conversion (actual: 20958, maximum: 2000)
22835. 00000 - "Buffer too small for CLOB to CHAR or BLOB to RAW conversion (actual: %s, maximum: %s)"
*Cause: An attempt was made to convert CLOB to CHAR or BLOB to RAW, where
the LOB size was bigger than the buffer limit for CHAR and RAW
types.
Note that widths are reported in characters if character length
semantics are in effect for the column, otherwise widths are
reported in bytes.
*Action: Do one of the following
1. Make the LOB smaller before performing the conversion,
for example, by using SUBSTR on CLOB
2. Use DBMS_LOB.SUBSTR to convert CLOB to CHAR or BLOB to RAW. -
Query slow in testing but quick in production
my query is slow in testing but very quick in production.help me..
Hi,
Check whether your Prod is Same as you Testing Environment.
Whether Parameters in Both DB are same or not Mainly Stats are in Update and same or not
One more thing is Plan of Query, how it is working in Prod and Test Server.
that gives the idea how the query Executed. Check out these things.
- Pavan Kumar N -
Is it possible to trace users sql query disconnected from the session
One of my users used to run the sql query daily, Now her machine rebooted and she lost all the sql query. is there any way to trap the sql what she used to run? I have the os/sql username....
thxuser587112 wrote:
Yes we are using 10.2.0.3. main requirement of user is all the sql query she used to run.To get this query she is giving me her os user.And says why it is not possible?What would that be possible? If this database is reserved for her only that could be possible.
Once she lost her session, there's no reliable method to trace all her SQL queries. The SID will be reused by Oracle, her SQL could be flushed out of shared pool, consider Oracle is designed to tackle with thousands of queries per seconds there's no feasible way to save all these information without impact on performance.
So unless you had sql trace turned on her session or the database is reserved for her use only, then no it's not possible to retrieve all her SQLs and guarantee it. You might be able recover some of SQL from the mentioned DBA views but no guarantee what so ever.
PS. it's no guarantee to get all her SQLs even her session is still active, unless SQL trace were turned on.
Edited by: yingkuan on Jan 13, 2009 11:48 AM -
Sql query slow while using poc *C, OCI
Sql query is taking long time while using fetching records from RAC using Pro *C, OCI. Same query working fine while using JDBC connection.what could be the issue.Please help
Thanks,
SamPro*C is not part of Oracle Solaris Studio (formerly Sun Studio). Studio has no special support for database programming. You are more likely to get a helpful answer in a database programming forum. Start here:
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/category.jspa?categoryID=18 -
Tracing query generated from application server
Hi all,
I'm trying to trace a session which is logged in to an application server.
The application server and database server are in a windows 2003 platform.
When I'm trying to generate a report from the application server it seems that it generates another session and when I checked on the program column from v$session, it was executed by java.exe.
There are 2 similiar reports that existed in the application server the other one is really fast and the other one is really slow.
using the deprecated parameter sql_trace which I can set to true, I can always get the trace file.
How can I trace that fast generated report that I need to compare with the slow one without using the sql_trace parameter?
My difficulty is just that when I click on the preview button which is going to preview it to PDF, it will spawn another session and that session will execute java.exe to generate the report.
May be any of you can give me a suggestion on the things that I need to do with this.
Regards,
AdhikaHi Finbar,
for the slow report, I was able to see the session from v$session but for the fast report, even if I prepred the query first before running the report, I don't have enough time to check it.
it was just to fast. so definitely the fast query has something which is really right so it can generate the query really really fast compare to the slow report.
FYI, my office is not in the same office as the developer so there's no way I can ask them either and also, there's no way for me to comunicate directly to developer as I need to go through some levels and procedures in my company.
Thank you,
Adhika
Maybe you are looking for
-
Need to restore iPod, but how?
Hi, my 5.5 video iPod freezes at the apple screen and when I reset it, it just goes back there again and stays. My computer won't recognize it, so I can't restore it through iTunes. What do I do? Thanks, Matt
-
Crystal Repots 2008 with VS2005
I´m developing a solution using Crystal Reports 2008 with Visual Studio 2005 and Oracle 10G. When I run the solution in my pc, it runs good. But when I run it in the server it asks for the input parameters and after I input the information it says th
-
Hello, We recently (a month or so ago) were able to set up OSX Server/Profile Manager/Workgroup Manager on Mtn Lion, and deploy to Mac desktops (deploy 802.1x settings and certs) When we upgraded the OSX Server to Mavericks, everything changed - PM i
-
App Store and Corporate Compliancy
Hi All, What is everyone's thoughts on the App Store and corporate compliancy? If you are an Admin are you going to let your Clients download whatever they want from the App Store or will you remove the application completely? Thanks!
-
I was wondering if anyone knows data well enough to recommend what GB I should get for the iPod 5th gen because I am getting a newer one. I have about 120 songs. I have about 400 pitures I usually don't go over dowloading 20 apps. I don't buy any new