SRM 7.0 extended : Account assignment is not getting populated by default

Hi All,
We have created Purchase order using shopping cart in SRM 7.0 extended classic scenario. Assuming that the delivery from the vendor is done. In Goods receipt The Account assignment is not getting populated by default. If we did the same manually it is picking up the details by default.
please let me know what we are missing.
Regards,
Lakshmi Narayana

Hi Laksmi
Account info must defaulted if it is not direct procurement.
check or you ordering as direct or not? if you have SC has Acc data and it must be copied into PO by default...
Muthu

Similar Messages

Account Assignment -IT1008 not getting updated

We use a BDC program to update position attributes (po13). All but
IT1008 is not getting updated. This works fine in support pack 4 environment but in
the environment with support pack 15, IT1008 is not getting updated.
I see that there are a quite few notes regarding IT1008. Can anyone
help?
Thank you.

Hi,
in support pack 4 environment and the support pack 15 coding might is different .
So record again and create a new BDC
or else
Change the Existing Position filed in the old program with the help of Abaper
All the Best
KRC

Why account assignment is not deleted when push "Order as Direct Material"?

Hi Gurus,
I have a problem with shopping carts (SC) of stock items:
1.- I add 5 items.
2.- I push "Order as Direct Material" button for 3 items only.
3.- I push "Hold" button to set SC with held status.
4.- I modify the SC and push "Order as Direct Material" button for 2 items missing.
5.- I order the SC.
One of the effects that it has the "Order as Direct Material" button is that it deletes the account assignment because the items will use to create a PO stock.
But for the last 2 items (number 4.-) the account assignment is not deleted.
This is causing that the PO's have error: "Invalid tax code".
Somebody can say to me why is not deleting the account assignment for items previously hold?
My systems are:
SRM 4.0 (SRM_SERVER 500) level 8
R/3 4.7 (SAP_APPL 470) level 24

Juan Alonso Valenzuela Rodríguez wrote:
> Hi Gurus,
>
> I have a problem with shopping carts (SC) of stock items:
>
> 1.- I add 5 items. -- O.K - Assumed that you have 5 items added
> 2.- I push "Order as Direct Material" button for 3 items only.O.K.You selected as ORDER as direct only for 3 rd item
> 3.- I push "Hold" button to set SC with held status.- O.K. now HOLD the shopping cart
> 4.- I modify the SC and push "Order as Direct Material" button for 2 items missing.- Now you went to 2 nd items and ORDER as direct
> 5.- I order the SC.but this 2 nd item account data was not removed though you selected as ORDER as direct-
check item data what is stored here DP ? if account assignment not cleared it could be a bug. but you need to convince them to get a correction note.
>
> One of the effects that it has the "Order as Direct Material" button is that it deletes the account assignment because the items will use to create a PO stock.
>
> But for the last 2 items (number 4.-) the account assignment is not deleted.
>
> This is causing that the PO's have error: "Invalid tax code".
>
> Somebody can say to me why is not deleting the account assignment for items previously hold?
>
> My systems are:
> SRM 4.0 (SRM_SERVER 500) level 8
> R/3 4.7 (SAP_APPL 470) level 24

'BAPI_PO_CREATE1' Multiple account assignment is not possible for AFS item

'BAPI_PO_CREATE1' -> This BAPI works perfectly without the 'account assignment' option . But for purchase requisitions which have account assignments BAPI returns the error - E|8W |185   |Multiple account assignment is not possible for AFS items.
Can somebody please help me to get this error resoleve .
My coding I have done like below.
DATA: pohead TYPE bapimepoheader.
DATA: poheadx TYPE bapimepoheaderx.
CONSTANTS : c_x VALUE 'X'.
DATA: exp_head TYPE bapimepoheader.
DATA: return TYPE TABLE OF bapiret2 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: poitem TYPE TABLE OF bapimepoitem WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: poitemx TYPE TABLE OF bapimepoitemx WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: posched TYPE TABLE OF bapimeposchedule WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: poschedx TYPE TABLE OF bapimeposchedulx WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: POACCOUNT TYPE TABLE OF BAPIMEPOACCOUNT WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: POACCOUNTX TYPE TABLE OF BAPIMEPOACCOUNTx WITH HEADER LINE.
pohead-comp_code = '1000'.   "IEQ1 plant. "'1000'.
pohead-doc_type   = 'NB'     .
pohead-creat_date = sy-datum   .
pohead-vendor = EKKO-LIFNR. "'0000500004'.
pohead-purch_org = purch_org.
pohead-pur_group = purch_grp.
pohead-langu      = sy-langu   .
pohead-doc_date   = sy-datum.
poheadx-comp_code = c_x.
poheadx-doc_type   = c_x.
poheadx-creat_date = c_x.
poheadx-vendor     = c_x.
poheadx-langu      = c_x.
poheadx-purch_org = c_x.
poheadx-pur_group = c_x.
poheadx-doc_date   = c_x.
poitem-po_item    = iLineItem.      "1.
poitem-material   = req_item-MATERIAL.   " '000000000040000234'.
poitem-plant      = req_item-PLANT.
poitem-quantity   = req_item-QUANTITY.
poitem-net_price = NET_PRICE.
poitem-price_unit = PRICE_UNIT.
poitem-shipping   = 'Z1'.
poitem-preq_no    = req_item-PREQ_NO.
poitem-preq_item = req_item-PREQ_ITEM.
poitem-acctasscat = 'K'.
APPEND poitem.
poitemx-po_item    = iLineItem. "1.
poitemx-po_itemx   = c_x.
poitemx-material   = c_x.
poitemx-plant      = c_x .
poitemx-quantity   = c_x .
poitemx-tax_code   = c_x .
poitemx-item_cat   = c_x .
poitemx-acctasscat = c_x .
poitemx-net_price = c_x.
poitemx-price_unit = c_x.
poitemx-shipping   = c_x.
poitemx-preq_no    = c_x.
poitemx-preq_item = c_x.
poitemx-acctasscat = c_x.
APPEND poitemx.
POACCOUNT-PO_ITEM = iLineItem.
POACCOUNT-SERIAL_NO = iLineItem.
POACCOUNT-GL_ACCOUNT = '0000211010'.
POACCOUNT-SD_DOC = '0001001056'.
POACCOUNT-ITM_NUMBER = '000100'.
POACCOUNT-CO_AREA = '1000'.
APPEND POACCOUNT.
POACCOUNTX-PO_ITEM = '00001'.
POACCOUNTX-SERIAL_NO = '01'." '01'.
POACCOUNTX-PO_ITEMX = 'X'.
POACCOUNTX-SERIAL_NOX = 'X'.
POACCOUNTX-GL_ACCOUNT = 'X'.
POACCOUNTX-SD_DOC = 'X'.
POACCOUNTX-ITM_NUMBER = 'X'.
APPEND POACCOUNTX.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'
    EXPORTING
      poheader = pohead
      poheaderx = poheadx
    IMPORTING
    exppurchaseorder = ex_po_number
    expheader        = exp_head
    TABLES
      return    = return
      poitem    = poitem
      poitemx   = poitemx
      POACCOUNT = POACCOUNT
      POACCOUNTX = POACCOUNTX.

I found the answer

IN SALES ORDER PLANT IS CHANGED BUT FM ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT IS NOT CHANGED

HI ALL
while changing the plant in sales order LINE ITEM FM accounting assignment is not changing accordingly FOR THE PARTICULAR LINE ITEM.
FOR THIS REASON NO ACCOUNTING DOCUMENT IS GENERATING.
THANKS & REGARDS
MALA

solution found.
Mala k reddy

Assignment field is not getting populated in KSB1 for posting key 50

Hi All,
We are uploading entries thru excel in SAP.
For posting key 50 assignment field is not getting populated in KSB1.
But for posting key 40 it is getting populated correctly.
All setting (FSG, posting key details) are same for both the keys.
No substitution defined in SAP.
There is no issue for FBL3N for both the posting keys, only issue with KSB1.
Any idea what could be the reason for this?
Thank you.
Akash

KSB1 is CCtr report..
if it is revenue normally it will be treated as statistical posting in CCtr accounting- for the cost element when it is defined as revenue element.. - check Cost elements - whether it is Cost and cost reducing or revenue element--
possibility this can be one of the reason.
check and confirm

When I put my Apple ID in to get apps it says I will receive an email with a link to verify my account I'm not getting the email or link

When I put my Apple ID in to get apps it says I will receive an email with a link to verify my account I'm not getting the email or link. have iPhone 4

Greetings Seahawks2014,
Thank you for contributing to the Apple Support Communities.
If you have not received a verification email from Apple, the tips in this article can help:
If you didn't receive your verification or reset email - Apple Support
Best Regards,
Jeremy

Baseline date not getting populated from SRM invoices posted to ECC 6.0

Hi,
We are currently in ECC 6.0. The SRM system is in 4.0. We have this particular problem that the baseline date is not getting populated from the Invoices posted from the SRM. The baseline date is blank and the document is saved.
Did anyone face the same problem??? Can you please refer SAP note 541934 and expand........
Thanks
Aravind
Edited by: Aitipamula Aravind on Aug 10, 2009 5:13 AM

Hello,
Yes, you could check the attached note 541934 and regard the implementation of the field ZFBDT in the invoicing document.
Note 541934 provides a solution how to achieve the MM-customizing for payment baseline dates getting effective for invoices with SRM-origin. This note needs to be applied at your ERP-MM-side in the former plug-in-layer. As described in the note, this is a modification. It's recommended to apply in non-productive system first.
Hope the above infor.are helps for you!
Best Regards,
Gladys xing

Hello, I lost secret answer to this account I can not get it back, knowing that I lost e-mail alternative, Can you help me ?

Hello, I lost secret answer to this account I can not get it back, knowing that I lost e-mail alternative, Can you offer me help?

You need to ask Apple to reset your security questions; ways of contacting them include clicking here and picking a method for your country, phoning AppleCare and asking for the Account Security team, and filling out and submitting this form.
They wouldn't be security questions if they could be bypassed without Apple verifying your identity.
(103098)

Payment Terms not getting populated on Intercompany Invoice document(FB50L)

Hi All,
I am facing an issue with the Vendor and/or Customer payment term on the inter-company invoice posted via FV50L/FB50L.
We have defined companies as vendors and customers so that we could do the inter-company posting. The inter-company processing is done by FV50L/FB50L with postings to the GL accounts in respective company codes directly. Once it gets posted, SAP automatically creates 2 document: Vendor invoice and Customer invoice. The vendor invoice document would have the credit line item created automatically and so is the debit line item for the customer invoice.
However, the payment terms from the vendor and/or customer master is not getting populated on the credit / debit line items generated automatically.
I have verified the payment terms on vendor and customer, OBYA config, field status group for posting key & the recon account, authorizations and these thing look good.
Have anyone come across this issue before? Please let me know.
Point will be assigned to valuable suggestions!!
Thanks very much for your help.
Anish

Hi Nakula,
Payment term gets populated correctly from the vendor/Customer master data in case of FB60/FB70 resp. The issue is only with the automatic Intercompany Vendor and Customer line items created where it does not populate the payment terms.
regards,
Shreya

Field in ALV not getting populated

Hi all,
           I need some help. I am displaying an ALV with fields.
    GROUP     G/L ACCOUNT     Local currency       USD     Period
       100              10                       5                       5           12
       100               11                      6                       4            12
now i have added an extra field TXT20 in the as last field of structure
    GROUP     G/L ACCOUNT     Local currency       USD     Period      TXT
       100              10                       5                       5           12          aa
       100               11                      6                       4            12         ab
TXT should come as 3rd coloumn in the output.
EXAMPLE:
     GROUP     G/L ACCOUNT       TXT      Local currency USD     Period
       100              10                      aa                  5              5           12
       100               11                     ab                   6             4            12
I have changed the coloumn positions in the field catalog accordingly and I have not written or changed any select queries from earlier output.
now my problem is PERIOD field is not getting populated in the ALv,the data is visible in the IT_FINAL which I am passing to Reuse_alv_grid_display. the field catalog is also getting build properly.
so plz suggest some changes so that I can move ahead.

Hi
I don't know what's the reason and now I have no environment to test it, but you can try other way:
1. define your fieldcate one by one as the sequence of your output like
      GROUP         G/L ACCOUNT          TXT           Local currency         USD          Period
      In this situation, you needn't use component -- position of fieldcate structure. Pay attention to
      fieldname in upper case.
   2. If only doing step1 has no effect, then adjust your structure of internal table. Sequence your
       component of IT_FINAL as the output field like step1.
   If still no effect, please let me know.

OVS value not getting populated in field

Hi Experts,
Kindly suggest me a solution for the below given issue.
I have added three custom fileds to an already existing WD Coponent.
And also added OVS help as an input help method to these fields.
If I right click on the WD application and TEST, the application opens in browser and I am able to select the value from OVS list.
If I run the application by copying the URL and paste it in the browser, or clicking on Portal link, if we select the value from OVS list that value is not getting populated in the field.
Below is the logic I have written.
method ON_OVS_PAYMENT .
TYPES:   BEGIN OF ty_payment,
             payment TYPE char4,
             desc    TYPE char30,
           END OF ty_payment.
* declare data structures for the fields to be displayed and
* for the table columns of the selection list, if necessary
types:
    begin of lty_stru_input,
*   add fields for the display of your search input here
      payment type char4,
*      desc    type string,
    end of lty_stru_input.
types:
    begin of lty_stru_list,
*   add fields for the selection list here
      payment type char4,
      desc    type char30,
    end of lty_stru_list.
data: ls_search_input type lty_stru_input,
        lt_select_list   type standard table of lty_stru_list,
        ls_text          type wdr_name_value,
        lt_label_texts   type wdr_name_value_list,
        lt_column_texts type wdr_name_value_list,
        lv_window_title type string,
        lv_group_header type string,
        lv_payment       type string,
        lt_payment       TYPE TABLE OF ty_payment,
        ls_payment       TYPE ty_payment,
        lv_short         TYPE string,
        lv_table_header type string.
field-symbols: <ls_query_params> type lty_stru_input,
                 <ls_selection>    type lty_stru_list.
case ovs_callback_object->phase_indicator.
    when if_wd_ovs=>co_phase_0. "configuration phase, may be omitted
*   in this phase you have the possibility to define the texts,
*   if you do not want to use the defaults (DDIC-texts)
      ls_text-name = `PAYMENT`. "must match a field name of search
      ls_text-value = `Terms of payment`. "wd_assist->get_text( `001` ).
      insert ls_text into table lt_label_texts.
      ls_text-name = `PAYMENT`. "must match a field in list structure
      ls_text-value = `Terms of Payment`. "wd_assist->get_text( `002` ).
      insert ls_text into table lt_column_texts.
      ls_text-name = `DESC`. "must match a field in list structure
      ls_text-value = `Description`. "wd_assist->get_text( `002` ).
      insert ls_text into table lt_column_texts.
      ovs_callback_object->set_configuration(
                label_texts = lt_label_texts
                column_texts = lt_column_texts
                group_header = lv_group_header
                window_title = lv_window_title
                table_header = lv_table_header
                col_count    = 2
                row_count    = 20 ).
    when if_wd_ovs=>co_phase_1.
      ovs_callback_object->context_element->get_static_attributes(
          importing static_attributes = ls_search_input ).
*     pass the values to the OVS component
      ovs_callback_object->set_input_structure(
          input = ls_search_input ).
    when if_wd_ovs=>co_phase_2.
      if ovs_callback_object->query_parameters is not bound.
******** TODO exception handling
      endif.
      assign ovs_callback_object->query_parameters->*
                              to <ls_query_params>.
      if not <ls_query_params> is assigned.
******** TODO exception handling
      endif.
*     call business logic for a table of possible values
*     lt_select_list = ???
      lv_short = <ls_query_params>-payment.
      CALL FUNCTION 'ZSIILESD001' DESTINATION 'LOGICALE22'
      EXPORTING
      i_payment             = lv_short
      TABLES
      ET_PAYMENT            = lt_payment.
    lt_select_list[] = lt_payment[].
      ovs_callback_object->set_output_table( output = lt_select_list ).
    when if_wd_ovs=>co_phase_3.
*   apply result
      if ovs_callback_object->selection is not bound.
******** TODO exception handling
      endif.
      assign ovs_callback_object->selection->* to <ls_selection>.
      if <ls_selection> is assigned.
        ovs_callback_object->context_element->set_attribute(
                               name = `PAYMENT`
                               value = <ls_selection>-payment ).
      endif.
endcase.
endmethod.

Hi Pradeep,
I don't think it really make any difference to the application run if we run from SE80 or run via application url.
Try to set the external break point in OVS PHASE3 for your user. Check if the break point is reached and data is set after selection from OVS.
Regards,
Rama

XREF3 field not getting populated in BSEG table while posting MIRO

Hi,
I have one query in MIRO tcode.I have activated xref3 field in MIRO tcode using enhancement LMR1MF6Q.Now when i try to post document with some values in xref3 field on screen ,value is not getting populated in BSEG table.Please tell me what else needs to be done to achieve this ?
any hint on this?
Thanks & Regards,
Soniya S.

Hi,
1.- According to SAP Note 904652 - MIRO: Different from FB60
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/904652
MIRO is an independent Materials Management (MM) transaction that does not
claim to be the same as the accounting transactions (such as FB60 or FB01).
MIRO was developed to allow users to process vendor invoices within the
context of the MM procurement processes as simply as possible.
For this reason, among other differences, the field selection was limited
to the absolutely necessary. For example, the following fields from the
accounting document are not available in Transaction MIRO (this list is not
complete):
Reference key (BSEG-XREF1, -XREF 2, -XREF 3)
2.- SAP Note 1156325 - BAdIs in the Logistics Invoice Verification environment
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1156325
Have a look at badi MRM_ITEM_CUSTFIELDS.
This badi will create a new tab at item level in order to display the new fields.
I haven´t used this badi so i cannot talk from experience here.
Think twice before deciding.
Best regards.

Data not getting populated in output form

hi all,
i have to create a layout set with two pages, and fill the first page with ekko data and second page with ekpo data. i have designed the layout set. but the values are not getting populated in my form and logo is also not displaying.....
can anyone help me.
regards
mano

Hi,
1.Delete the Logo Command from the Textelement.And re include from Include ->Graphics->Stored document server>Select logo>execute.
2.Have you written the Driver program for the Layout.
IF yes,Have you assign the Form and Driver program in NACE.
3.If yes,Then Debug the Driver and Script ,check those values are coming or not.
Regards,
Shiva.

Values not getting populated in the SMOPCCAPRO

Hi,
We had added a new field to CPGProduct in component CPGOE_ABLOCKS. But the extension field was not included to the BOL structure automatically.
So ,we had used the SAP note 1472567 to add the include structure INCL_EEW_MKTPL_PRD to structure CRMS_MKTPL_CPG_PROD which inturn would rectify our BOL structure CRMS_MKTPL_IB_CPG_PROD.
The field which we had added using AET was added in tables CRMD_MKTPL_PROD and SMOPCCAPRO. But we are facing an issue that the values are not getting populated in the SMOPCCAPRO table on save.The values are gettign populated in the CRM table.
Do we need to implement any other SAP note on the midleware side too to rectify this issue as i infer some interface structure would be missing this field which results in the truncation of value from being passed to the CDB table . Any pointers in this regard would be helpful.
Thanks
Swapna.

Hi Swapna,
as the CDB table has been extended with the new field I assume that you have enabled the mobile flag for the enhancement.
Then it will also extend the mobile BDOC and the data should be transfered automatically.
If this does not happen there's an error somewhere. Either the middleware is not set up properly or the mapping routine does not transfer the fields properly.
I recommend to raise an OSS message for this.
Best regards
Matthias

SRM 7.0 extended : Account assignment is not getting populated by default

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for