SRM 7SC item overview screen -Tax amount is not updated on change of Zfield

Hi ,
We use z function module for tax calculation , which is updated in table BBP_FUNCTION_MAP.
Which works fine for standard fields changed.
Now if we change one of z field ( which is part of tax calculation in z FM ), tax amount is getting correctly calculated in above Z FM ( we can see in debugging),  but not updated on SC UI screen.
Same will be updated if we change standard field like price , mat grp etc.
Please let  me know , how we can refresh this UI for tax amount in SC.
Regards,
Nilesh

Dear Poster,
As no response has been provided to the thread in some time I must assume the issue is resolved, if the question is still valid please create a new thread rephrasing the query and providing as much data as possible to promote response from the community.
Best Regards,
SDN SRM Moderation Team

Similar Messages

  • Item's withholding tax amount is not zero

    Dear All,
    When ever we clear the vendor account through f.13 system was showing the below mentioned message.
    S No customer documents selected
    S No G/L account documents selected
    I Only accounts with debit and credit postings are included
    X Item's withholding tax amount is not zero 0101 K 319936 13000031 105352237 1
    X Item's withholding tax amount is not zero 0101 K 319936 13000031 105352237 2
    I Stop date " 02.01.2010 Stop time " 17:00:00
    Client is asking no need to show Items withholding tax amount is not zero message.
    Where as the clearing criteria is business place .
    Regards,
    Teja

    Hi,
    please refer to the note 499902 and 442588 for the explanation why the transaction F.13 has given out
    this error and which transactions (FBZ2 or F-53) should be used to clear the items with the withholding tax info maintained.
    Reg
    Madhu M

  • Tax Amount is not updated into BSEG

    Dear All,
    I have recently added a tax amount field MWSTS from table BSEG into FBL1N - Vendor Line Item Display. To my surprise the input tax amount is not updated into BSEG table. The input tax is normally posted using either MIRO or FB60.
    Any one has the same problem? Can please kindly share how to fix the problem?
    Thanks in advance for your kind assisstance.
    rgds,
    Dahlia

    Thanks Andreas,
    However I do believe that it should be updated into BSEG - MWSTS as we have mutliple companies in different countries in the system. All the other companies have the input rate updated into BSEG - MWSTS for the vendor line item, only the company for India is not updated.
    Yes, BSET do have the tax amount updated but I can't use BSET table in FBL1N. I need to provide the tax amount information for each vendor line item in FBL1N.
    thks
    Dahlia

  • Withholding tax amount is not updated in with_item table

    Dear all,
    In our system, one vendor invoice posted through FB60. In which, system generates withholding tax lin item. The same line item shows in BSIS and WITH_ITEM tables. It also shows in GL account line item display as open item. But, in WITH_ITEM table system not calcuate tax amount and shows as nil withholding tax amount against withholding tax base amount because of this I will get error at the time of creating challan through J1INCHLN.
    Please help us though there is statutatory payment due date.
    Regards,
    Kalpik

    Hi Raghvendra,
    Thanks for reply. Why system is not update withholding tax amount only for that particular document ?
    So, we can take precaution in future also.
    Regards,
    Kalpik

  • Adding a new column to item overview screen 4900 in sales order transaction

    Hi All,
    I want to add a new column to refer to a custom field in screen 4900 ( Item overview screen ) in sales order transaction. Please suggest appropriate exit or BADI for the same. Give all steps to do the same.
    Thanks in adavance.
    Jawahar.

    Hi
    As the link that RamKi let us know, this is a modification, so, I suggest to avoid. See SAP Note 862228 - Order reason for returns on item level for further information. I suggest to use the other enhancements in tabs.
    Regards
    Eduardo

  • How to add column in the item overview screen (4900) in sales order?

    Hello Experts,
    I have a requirement to add a column (Field - Size/Dimensions - MARA-GROES) in the Item Overview Screen (4900).
    Is there any provision for that? Any enhancement or screen exit or so?
    Quick response will be appriciated.
    Thanks in advance.
    regards,
    hp

    Hi
    As the link that RamKi let us know, this is a modification, so, I suggest to avoid. See SAP Note 862228 - Order reason for returns on item level for further information. I suggest to use the other enhancements in tabs.
    Regards
    Eduardo

  • PO Screen Layout change, Addition of one column in Item Overview screen!

    Hi All,
    I have one typical requirement where in user wants to add one column in the Item overview screen, example "Reason for ordering" which is there in Item Detail under Retail Tab!
    Can anyone suggest, How can i get this done? and also i want to know if  there is any possibility to add this field at header level??
    please let me know if i'm not clear in describing the issue...
    Suggestion and solutions would be rewarded & appreciated,
    Thanks in Advance..
    Regards,
    Siddaram

    hi,
    Check sap note 458591..
    Regards
    Priyanka.P

  • To call subscreen in ME47 before item overview screen appears

    Hi,
    Once enter is pressed in ME47 after giving RFQ number,
    I need to call a custom screen before the item overview screen shown.
    Kindly help me to do this.
    Thanks.

    Hi Shailaja,
    The program name SAPLMBAM is not meant for the initial screen of maintain quotation.This program has link with the table AMPL(Table of Approved Manufacturer Parts).You could see different layout for this program ,with the screen 120.
    Kindly suggest me on this asap.
    Thanks

  • Item Overview screen in PO

    Hello All,
    I would like to increase the Item overview screen in the PO. Currently, I can enter 17 items at one go, if I change the screen resolution the same will increased to 22 line items.
    My requirement is to enter >100 line items in the PO. Is there any setting which will give leverage to update >100 line items in one go.
    Regards,
    Aravind

    Hello Manish,
    I am currently using Page down option but the requirement is to copy & paste from excel file and line items are more than 250.
    Thanks for your suggestion.
    Regards,
    Aravind

  • Making the fields invisible or etc. at the item overview screen

    At the header data of the sales documents, there exist incoterms and payment terms. I want to make those invisible at the item overview screen (under Billing Document tab). I just want those data root from the header data, not from the item data. I don't want to enter data (about payment terms or incoterms) on the item overview screen.

    Thank you for your consideration but can you please explain step by step.
    Also to be more clear; the incoterm datas of the sales document's items come from the customer master data. Person can change or enter data about incoterms although there may exist different incoterm data at the header. That's why I want to hide or make unchangeable the incoterm field at the billing document tab of item data.
    Thanks in advance.

  • In fbl1n report for document type RE  withholding tax amount is not showing

    in fbl1n report for document type RE  withholding tax amount is not showing
    in sap note 363309 determines
    Solution
    Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information (field BSEG-QSSHB) from your display
    variant.
    If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on the document number and
    subsequently choose 'Withholding tax'.
    my doubt is we remove the field BSEG-QSSHB in layout how can show the withholding tax amount in FBLIN report
    how to remove from the layout
    please clarefy
    bhayyapu   

    Hi,
    If you want to check amounts of withholding tax for the vendors, you have some options to view it. You can access the WITH_ITEM, LFC1 tables by SE16. You have too the S_P00_07000134 report. This report is developed for the Colombia but I already used for the another country with the ABAP development for this country.
    Also you can use table join BSIK and WITH_ITEM by SQVI for the open items and BSAK and WITH_ITEM for cleared items. It is more simple and fast.
    JPA

  • Error Message FF747  -The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

    Hello,
    We are attempting to post an import vendor invoice through transaction    FB60 for Israel company code . Since the tax charged by the vendor is not fixed every time , we are entering the tax amount in the    FB60 screen manually , without selecting 'calculate tax'.The amount of tax is greater than the amount of expense as per the real business scenario. For example amount of expense is 100, amount of tax is 200 and the total amount charged by the vendor is 300 .However when we simulate the posting we get an error - The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base-Message no. FF747
    We tried putting a very high percentage in the tax code also but it didn't help
    We would like to go ahead with this posting. Could you pl throw light on the same . ? Is there any way (OSS note ) or a work around which can resolve the issue ?
    Best Regards
    Amit  Kulkarni

    Hello
    This may be  a work around in other cases , but since we want the amount to be updated in the BSET table for further VAT reports , we would like  this to be posted along with the expense item

  • FBL1( VENDOR LEDGER REPORT)-  Withholding tax amount is not coming .

    in FBL1 ( vENDOR lEDGER rEPORT) - WITHHOLDING TAX AMOUNT IS NOT CMING IN COLUMN  QBSHB OF FBL1.
    Purchasing document number is not coming also.
    How these fields may appear in the above said report. Is any config missing ?
    Thanks in advance
    M K Agarwal
    9967029930

    TDS posted from MIRO will not reflect in line item report, i have taken opinion from SAP for the same issue few days back, SAP has given the following opinion.
    *With reference to the difference in behaviour as compared to the document posted for example from MIRO which is an MM transaction and FB60 which is a FI transaction please note the following:
    The withholding tax amount that you are using i.e. Field BSEG-QBSHB is designed to fill for the classic withholding tax. And extended withholding tax information is stored exclusive in table WITH_ITEM.
    Also note that MIRO does not give the user the control in case of Classical withholding tax. It only supports Extended withholding tax. Hence it does not populate BSEG fields in case of Extended WT.
    So in MIRO, the data for extended withholding tax are saved within the table WITH_ITEM and not within the table entry BSEG-QBSHB. The latter isnot updated during the procedure. Furthermore it is not possible to select data from table WITH_ITEM
    within the transaction FBL1N in a transparent and unique way, as FBL1N only reads BSEG / BSIK / BSAK tables.
    In your line layout,you define a field BSEG-QBSHB. But actually the field of vendor/customer line item is filled with zero from FI. Thus,it shows zero in line item display*
    Please review note 363309 for detailed explanation and explains the functionality which is valid even for your release.
    So it is not possible to display withholding tax information in the line item display transactions, since this information is not
    held in the BSEG / BSIK / BSAK tables, but is instead stored in the WITH_ITEM table.
    Please convey to your client, standard SAP will not show the TDS information in line item reports, documents posted from MIRO and refer  the note 363309.

  • Tax amount is not appearing in consumption history of earmarked fund

    Dear Experts,
    It is a requirement from my customer, the tax item be populated with the same earmarked fund, commitment item, functional area, funds center and fund of the related expense or revenue item.
    The transaction OBBH and the exit presented in attachment was used to try to achieve that requirement.
    The accounting document was correctly created with the tax item correctly populated with the earmarked fund, commitment item, functional area, funds center and fund from the related expense item.
    The funds management document was also  correctly created including the tax item with the correct commitment item, fund, funds center and functional area.
    The problem detected is related with the missing tax value in consumption history of the earmarked fund. The value of the tax item is not appearing in records of tables KBLP and FMIOI.
    Could you please help me with this problem?
    Kind Regards,
    Rui Neves

    Hi,
    Thanks for your answer.  We are reimplementing the REFX solution for a company.  The existing system is also in ECC6.  For  contracts made in existing system when periodic posting done, tax is shown against both contract and rental object.  The value of periodic posting is same for both contract and rental object.
    However, in the new implementation, tax amount is not appearing against rental rental object.  Tax amount is appearing against rental contract.  As a result, there is a difference in amount.  Is this correct as a process ?
    Regards,
    T Saravanan

  • TDS TAX AMOUNT  IS NOT MACHING WITH INVOICE WTAX AMOUNTu2019

    Dear All,
    I am Facing Following Problem in TDS
    While creating an A/P Invoice after putting row level information when user click on u2018ADDu2019 button u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D opens for deduction of TDS amount. When user selects u201CWithholding Tax Codeu201D in u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D to deduct TDS amount for an invoice system shows WTax amount as per rate of deduction. But when user click on u2018OKu2019 to u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D window, WTax Amount will comes as zero on A/P Invoice window.
    Then when again user will go to u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D and manually put the value of WTax Amount system reflects it on A/P Invoice window.
    In case when we set approval procedure to A/P Invoice, this invoice goes for an approval. After coming back as approved invoice when originator of invoice going to u2018ADDu2019 the same document system shows an error as u2018TDS TAX AMOUNT  IS NOT MACHING WITH INVOICE WTAX AMOUNTu2019
    please reply me ASAP
    Thanks & Regards,
    Swapnil

    hi
    try this
    We need to follow  the following steps
    u2022     Open the BP master for which TDS needs to be deducted go to the accounting tab followed by tax option and then  click on the checkbox subject to withholding tax
    u2022     Click on the option WTAX codes Allowed and select the TDS Category
    u2022     On the previous window click the check box pertaining the checkbox  u201CTDS OVERLOOKu201D
    Regards,
    Manish

Maybe you are looking for

  • Why is there no 'Snooze' option for iPhone calendar? Patent issue?

    Blackberry and Microsoft mobile platforms offer this. Clearly Apple isn't losing sales because of not offering a Snooze for the native calendar, but it is an extreme nuisance to not implement what seems as such a simple feature. My question is why? I

  • War Game

    Hi, I was wondering if anyone could help me to make the java game War. I have these two classes, the Deck class and Card class: import java.util.*; public class Deck { // Instance Variables private Card[] theDeck = new Card[52]; // Set up random numb

  • Spark DataGrid

    I am trying to access a column object using the column collection: var col:GridColumn = personnel.columns[0]; But I am getting an error: Property 0 not found on mx.collections.ArrayList and there is no default value. Here is my DataGrid: <s:DataGrid

  • Tweaking QoS port parameters and policing

    Hi, Is there a mathematical method of configuring bandwidth weights and queue limits or is it more art than science? For example, using the 3550 series switches, when you perform auto-qos, it chooses the following parameters: wrr-queue bandwidth 10 2

  • Aol aim on the g4

    I have thankfully sold my pc desktop (though a honey of a machine) for an apple g4 15inch (which is loads better). i have no complaints about this awesome machine, however, i have a complaint about a program 'written' for it. the program is aol insta