SSL VPN Full and Split Tunnel Config Question

I am Beta testing SSLVPN on an IOS router. The question I have is this:
Is it possiable to have slit and full tunnel configs. It seems that once you create your context and default profile that is all you have either split or full. The books say you can use Radius and assign different profiles but, I would like to give the users a choice (like in the VPN3000 .pcf) of either split or full depending on where they are working from.

The below is an example using the ASA - but the principle remains the same:-
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080975e83.shtml
HTH>

Similar Messages

  • Issues with basic VPN setup and split tunneling

    I have created an SSL VPN to a CISCO ASA 8.6 running ASDM 6.6.
    Im able to connect to the VPN and reach all the devices with the LAN but  Im not able to browse the web. When I enable the split tunnel Im able  to browse the web but then Im not able to reach any internal device.
    Here is part of the show run:
    object network RedInterna
    subnet 150.211.101.0 255.255.255.0
    description Red Interna
    object network NETWORK_OBJ_10.4.1.0_28
    subnet 10.4.1.0 255.255.255.240
    access-list inside_access_in extended permit ip object RedInterna any
    access-list VPN_INTERNET standard permit 150.211.101.0 255.255.255.0
    pager lines 24
    logging enable
    logging asdm informational
    mtu outside 1500
    mtu inside 1500
    mtu management 1500
    ip local pool VPN_POOL 10.4.1.1-10.4.1.14 mask 255.255.255.240
    failover
    failover lan unit secondary
    failover lan interface fail-1 GigabitEthernet0/2
    failover key *****
    failover interface ip fail-1 10.3.1.21 255.255.255.252 standby 10.3.1.22
    icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
    asdm image disk0:/asdm-66114.bin
    asdm history enable
    arp timeout 14400
    nat (inside,outside) source static any any destination static  NETWORK_OBJ_10.4.1.0_28 NETWORK_OBJ_10.4.1.0_28 no-proxy-arp  route-lookup
    nat (inside,outside) after-auto source dynamic any interface
    access-group inside_access_in in interface inside
    route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 187.217.68.145 1
    route inside 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 10.1.1.78 1
    route inside 150.211.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.1.1.78 1
    webvpn
    enable outside
    anyconnect image disk0:/anyconnect-win-3.1.00495-k9.pkg 1
    anyconnect enable
    tunnel-group-list enable
    group-policy GroupPolicy_VPN_ internal
    group-policy GroupPolicy_VPN_ attributes
    wins-server none
    dns-server value 8.8.8.8
    vpn-tunnel-protocol ssl-client
    default-domain value dominio.com.mx
    tunnel-group VPN_ type remote-access
    tunnel-group VPN_ general-attributes
    address-pool VPN_POOL
    default-group-policy GroupPolicy_VPN_
    tunnel-group VPN_ webvpn-attributes
    group-alias VPN_ enable
    I´m not sure if Im missing some small details or setup. Any help will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks!!!

    Hi,
    When you are using Full Tunnel VPN (which is the default setting) you will have a couple of things that you need to configure on the ASA.
    First, the ASA by default won't allow traffic to enter through an interface and then leave through that same interface. This is what essentially happens when the traffic from the VPN Client comes to the ASA and then heads out to the Internet.  In your case the traffic comes through the "outside" and leaves through the "outside" interface.
    You will need this command
    same-security-traffic permit intra-interface
    You can check if its enabled at the moment with the command
    show run same-security-traffic
    Second, the VPN users will need to have NAT configuration just like any LAN users behind the actual ASA. So you will essentially have to configure Dynamic PAT for traffic from "outside" to "outside"
    You can accomplish that with the following configuration
    object network VPN-PAT
    subnet 10.4.1.0 255.255.255.240
    nat (outside,outside) dynamic interface
    I would imagine that this should do it for you to be able to connect to the Internet and to the LAN network when the VPN is active.
    Hope this helps
    Let me know how it goes.
    - Jouni

  • SonicWall Global VPN Client and Split tunneling

    Hello All,
    I searched Google and the forums here and can't find someone with the same problem.
    Lets start at the beginning-Just started this job a couple months ago and people brought to my attention immediately an issue while they were on the VPN they could not get to the internet.  I know about the different security risks but we have multiple field reps that need internet access while using our CRM program.  So I setup Split Tunneling on the Sonicwall. Tested and works fine on my home PC using a WRT54GS Ver 2.1 and the SonicWall Global VPN Client.
    So I was sure everything was fine until I just sent out 2 laptops to 2 different sales reps and they are both having the same issue.  They can get into the internal network but can't access the internet.  They are both on WRT54G (different Vers.).  I tested the VPN client on both laptops with tethering on my cell phone and the split tunneling works. I have tried updating firmware thinking that was the issue.  I also tried to put their home network on a different subnet.  All with no joy.  I was wondering if anyone ever ran into something like this or have any clues what to try next. 
    -Thank You in advance for your time.
    Message Edited by Chris_F on 01-11-2010 07:41 AM
    Chris F.
    CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Sec

    Of course, you do as you are told. But I hope you keep written record of what you have been told and have it signed of whoever told you to set it up. It's essential that you stay on the safe side in these matters.
    I have read of too many cases where the system/security admin did not do so and in the end was held responsible for security incidents simply because he was told to do something to jeopardize security of the network. Remember, that usually the person who tells you do to so has no idea about the full security implication of a decision.
    Thus, I highly recommend to require your road staff to connect with no split tunneling. Refuse to do otherwise unless you have it in writing and you won't be held reliable in any way if something happens because of it.
    Just think what happens if the whole customer database gets stolen because of one of the remote sales reps... There is a reason why you apply this web site blocking on your firewalls and there is absolutely no reason that would justify why your remote sale reps don't go through the very same firewall while accessing company-sensitive data in your CRM.
    So put that straight with whoever told you to do otherwise and if you they still want to continue anyway get it in writing. Once you ask for the statement in writing many decision-makers come to their senses and let you do your job at the best you can and for what you were hired... And if not, well, at least you got rid of the responsibility in that aspect.

  • RA VPN on ASA and Split Tunneling

    Hello Forum,
    I'm having an issue with RA VPN and split tunneling. Our company doesn't allow split tunneling.
    I have the following....
    ASA 5520 - ASA Version - 8.0(3)
    Group Policies defined for different groups. My test group, I thought I disabled split tunneling but they are still able to surf the net.
    For Split Tunneling Policy...
    Inherit is unchecked
    I have "Tunnel Network List Below"
    Testing_splitTunnelAcl is my acl. I have a bunch of host IPs in the list. I don't have any or 0.0.0.0 in the list.
    But they can still surf the net.
    I would like to block access to net. No hairpinning or internet u-turns.
    How do I do this?
    Any help greatly appreciated.
    Regards,

    What does your Testing_spliTunnelAcl have?
    To disable split tunneling, your Testing_spliTunnelAcl should only have this...
    access-list Testing_splitTunnelAcl standard permit any
    ...which means all traffic will be encrypted and will be sent to ASA no matter what. If you add any IP Address, only those traffic destined to the IP Address in the list will be encrypted and send to ASA, everything else will go to internet from the client.
    It may be confusing but try and see what happens.

  • ASA 5505 as a SSL VPN Server and Easy VPN Client at the same time?

    Is it possible to configure and operate the ASA 5505 as a SSL VPN server and Easy VPN Client at the same time? We would like to configure a few of these without having to purchase additional ASA 5505 and use a 2 device method (1 SSL VPN Server and 1 Easy VPN Client). Thanks in advance.

    I don't think it is possible. Following links may help you
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008068dabe.html
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a008071c428.shtml

  • IP Phone SSL VPN and Split tunneling

    Hi Team,
    I went throught the following document which is very useful:
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-9124
    The only things i'm not sure about split-tunneling point:
    Group-policy must not be configured with split tunnel or split exclude.  Only tunnel all is the supported tunneling policy
    I could see many implementation when they used split-tunneling, like one of my customer:
    group-policy GroupPolicy1 internal
    group-policy GroupPolicy1 attributes
    banner value This system is only for Authorized users.
    dns-server value 10.64.10.13 10.64.10.14
    vpn-tunnel-protocol ssl-client
    split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
    split-tunnel-network-list value split-tunnel
    default-domain value prod.mobily.lan
    address-pools value SSLClientPool
    webvpn
      anyconnect keep-installer installed
      anyconnect ssl rekey time 30
      anyconnect ssl rekey method ssl
      anyconnect ask none default anyconnect
    username manager-max password XTEsn4mfYvPwC5af encrypted privilege 15
    username manager-max attributes
    vpn-group-policy GroupPolicy1
    tunnel-group PhoneVPN type remote-access
    tunnel-group PhoneVPN general-attributes
    address-pool SSLClientPool
    authentication-server-group AD
    default-group-policy GroupPolicy1
    tunnel-group PhoneVPN webvpn-attributes
    group-url https://84.23.107.10 enable
    ip local pool SSLClientPool 10.200.18.1-10.200.18.254 mask 255.255.254.0
    access-list split-tunnel remark split-tunnel network list
    access-list split-tunnel standard permit 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
    It is working for them w/o any issue.
    My question would be
    - is the limitation about split-tunneling still valid? If yes, why it is not recommended?
    Thanks!
    Eva

    Hi,
    If you're not using certificates in client authentication then the SSL handshake will complete before the user is requested to authenticate with username/password.  If this authentication request fails you will see the SSL session terminated immediately following this failure (as in the logs you provided).  Notice the 5 seconds between the SSL session establishment and termination, this is most likely when the user is being authenticated against the aaa server.  If the phone is failing authentication against an external aaa-server you'll want to investigate the logs on that server to determine the root cause of the failure.  The ASA can also provide confirmation of the authentication request/reject with the command 'show aaa-server'.  If you want to see what's going on at an authentication protocol level you can enable several debugs including "debug aaa authentication|common|internal' and protocol specific debugs such as 'debug radius user|session|all' or 'debug ldap'.
    Did this answer your question? If so, please mark it Answered!

  • Cisco 3745, VPN and Split Tunneling

    I tried following the model here: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns340/ns394/ns171/ns27/networking_solutions_white_paper09186a008018914d.shtml
    but after doing so, the situation was actually reversed. While connected to the vpn client you were able to browse the internet but not able to access vpn resources. I undid and redid the configuration several times to rule out keying in problems.
    Can one help with this problem... If needed Ill post necessary configs from my router.. Thanks
    (btw: do these froms have a search?)

    I am having the same problems with pix 501. With split tunnel, I get web but no lan access. Without split tunnel, full lan access, no web. My acl for the splitTunnel is:
    permit ip host 192.168.1.0 any
    Is this wrong?

  • SSL VPN Full Tunnel - Not Reliable

    We have been trying to deploy SSL VPN on a 3825 router running 12.4.20T2 with Anyconnect V2.2.0140. It works normally for a few days, then begins to fail in different ways. First, the users do not get the login screen from the Web access. This can be reset by stopping and starting the service. However, now I get fully connected and in a single session, sometimes I can access network resources and sometimes I can't (comes and goes to various parts of the network). I know if I reboot the router, everything will be fine for a few days. I also run Client VPN on this same router and it is very stable. Whenever I call TAC, the first question I get is "Do you have an ASA that you can run SSL VPN on?", and everytime I ask if they know something about the reliability of SSL VPN on IOS. They always say "it should work".
    I guess what I am asking is, are there known reliability issues with full tunnel SSL VPN on IOS? Or, if anyone else has seen these kinds of problems and found solutions? Thanks!

    Please enable the following command and then try to connect:
    ip inspect log drop-pkt
    If I am not overlooking at the configuration, it seems to be ok, so I would like to check ZBF.
    Please check the logs generated by the Router and let me know if you see anything related to your connection.
    Thanks.
    Portu.

  • AnyConnecy VPN and Split-tunnel ACL - Strange...

    Hi,
    I have ACL as follows and applied on AnyConnect VPN group as split-tunel value ACL.
    access-list SPLIT-ACL extended permit tcp host 192.168.200.63 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 eq www
    access-list SPLIT-ACL extended permit tcp host 192.168.200.63 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 eq https
    When I connected with AnyConnect client, I can ping to 192.168.200.63 and also telnet to port 80. However I can not telnet to port 443. Strange thing is I do not see any hits on above ACL, morever I'm wondering how cam the ICMP is working and why it does not stop on this ACL..?
    Phase: 4
    Type: ACCESS-LIST
    Subtype:
    Result: DROP
    Config:
    Implicit Rule
    Additional Information:
    Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
    in  id=0x78e03140, priority=11, domain=permit, deny=true
            hits=113713, user_data=0x5, cs_id=0x0, use_real_addr, flags=0x0, protocol=0
            src ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0, tag=0
            dst ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0, tag=0 dscp=0x0
            input_ifc=outside, output_ifc=any
    When I did the packet-tracer both ICMP and http it just drop on Phase 4..as bellow, I just want to know what this ACL and where its been applied to..?
    What is the correct syntax for packet-tracer command when troubleshooting AnyConnect VPN to check access inside/dmz server..?
    I have used as follows:
    packet-tracer input outside icmp 172.16.1.1 0 8 192.168.200.63 details
    Appreciate if someone can help me out on this..
    thanks

    To start with it is not ideal to configure a port based split tunnel. It is not support and will give you weird results like one you are experiencing. You should use standard access-list for the split tunnel and to restrict the users to the following port use vpn filter.
    As far as packet tracer is concerned for the VPN client if you use the outside interface as source it will never work the reason is the connection between the ASA and the client is of real IP address (Public) and the traffic that you are testing with is a VPN encrypted traffic your ASA's outside interface doesn't know what is 172.16.1.1, he will check it against the outside access-list and will drop it.
    So in your case i would strongly recommed that use standard access-list for the split tunnel and to restrict the user to specific port use vpn filter. Following are the links to configure the same:
    Allow Split Tunnel for Anyconnect:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080975e83.shtml
    Configure VPN filter (Its for site to site and remote access but it works the same for Anyconnect):
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00808c9a87.shtml
    Thanks
    Jeet Kumar

  • Is RV110W capable of "selective" VPN routing? Split tunneling?

    Hello,
    I'm trying to find an anwer to for a question whether the RV110W is capable of distinguish between traffic that should go to VPN tunnel and traffic that should not go thru the VPN tunnel - I think this is called split tunneling.
    I've been requested to create a VPN Tunnel between an office that's using the RV110W and one corporate network where a VPN server is running. That is quite easy as I know that RV110W has VPN client mode, however there a requirement not to route all traffic through the VPN tunnel. Only traffic that directs to the corporate network (certain ragne of IP addresses) should be routed thru the VPN tunnel and the rest that directs elsewhere should not go to VPN tunnel.
    Is this achievable with this device?
    If not, could you recommend me a device that is capable to satisfy this requirement?
    Thank you for your anwers.

    Ladislav,
    When you create a site to site VPN tunnel, all devices on each side that are on the same VLAN in which the tunnel is created should have access to each other. It will be like they are on the same network but they will have different IP subnets. So the answer is yes, devices on the "server" side should be able to access devices on the RV110W side.
    - Marty

  • RV320 SSL VPN ActiveX and Virtual Passage driver on Windows 7 64-bit

    Hi,
    My company has just purchased a new RV320 router and only afterwards found out from the release notes that there are issues with the SSL VPN in this unit and other small business routers. Is there any news on when these issues will be fixed?
    1) ActiveX controls have expired certificate dated 24/9/14 - this prevents them from running unless without changing IE security settings to prompt or allow unsigned controls, which is a big security risk.
    2) ActiveX controls do not work on Windows 64-bit. Release notes state Windows 7 IE10 and Windows 8.1 IE11, however they also fail on Windows 7 IE11. Even adding router to Trusted Sites to force 32-bit mode results in error message stating that IE is required for the controls.
    3) Virtual Passage driver will not install - crashes IE10/IE11 with a BEX violation.  From a dig around the web it appears that the Netgear SRX5308 uses the same Cavium chipset and a Virtual Passage driver that works with Windows 7 64-bit, and installs fine using IE10/11 (and if you install the Netgear driver it works with the Cisco RV routers too, proving that the driver is fully compatible...) - if Netgear can get this working, why can't Cisco?
    I've only just started setting us this router and show stopper issues like this might end up with an RMA being requested as it appears to be unsuitable for purpose, already run into other issues with I've posted about. :(
    EDIT: Got (2) sort of working on IE11 - seems that the Cisco interface is specifically looking for old style IE user agent strings, so using developer tools to set the user agent to IE9, and changing security settings in Trusted Sites to prompt for unsigned controls (due to issue (1)), allows the controls to install and load. These issues are pretty simple to fix, requiring just a string check change and updated signed controls. Fingers crossed these are fixed in the new firmware due soon, awaiting response from Cisco support to my open ticket.
    Looks like (3) is prevented from working by (1), and also because the certificate has expired it is treated as software without a valid publisher which cannot be installed in Windows 7 without fiddling in the registry. Releasing an updated version with a certificate that isn't expired should solve that issue too.
    These are ridiculously simple fixes to push out, I can't believe a major hardware vendor like Cisco hasn't already solved these issues.

    I've had a reply from Cisco support regarding this issue, and it's a bleak outlook. This is a copy from the email I received:
    "Engineering has no plans to support SSL VPN on RV32x due to chipset limitations. Pretty much, it will work for old XP and Win7 32-bits."
    So Cisco are falsely advertising that the RV320 has SSL VPN capabilities when there are no plans to update it so that it works with 64-bit Windows (which is now the major install base for Windows as most new systems are 64-bit based), and as the certificates have expired in the SSL VPN components they are not even useable on 32-bit systems without overriding a number of security settings.
    Dan

  • IPSec and split tunneling

    Hi,
    One of my users need to work sometimes in second (not our) office and have access to printer. The problem is that the in the remote and local office there is the same network (10.0.0.0/24). VPN's policy distinguish network 10.0.0.0/24  that should go through the tunnel. The printer in the remote office has IP address 10.0.0.102. Is there any posibility to solve it ? I've tried with access-list:
    access-list SPLIT_TUNNEL_LIST standard deny host 10.0.0.102
    access-list SPLIT_TUNNEL_LIST standard permit 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
    but it doesn't work
    regards
    Hubert

    solved by NAT,
    regards

  • Moving  and splitting photos - catalog questions

    Until recently, all my photos were On one disc with one Lightroom catalog. Now there are too many photos for a single disc, so I split them into two discs and created a new catalog to deal with the two different locations. Of course, I immediately lost all of my light room edits. I have plenty of backups, so nothing was truly lost now the question:
    How do I keep one Lightroom catalog while splitting the photos into two drives, AND keep all my edits, virtual copies, etc?
    Right now, the restored catalog contains all the edits, but half the photos aren't where the catalog expects them to be. What is the easiest and safest way to do this?
    Running Lightroom CC, windows 7/64, all software up-to-date.
    Thanks,
    EdB

    A single Lightroom catalog can support photos stored on multiple disks, even offline photos. If you want to move photos from one disk to another you can do the moves within Lightroom. If you choose to do the move in the OS then you can relink the photos. In short, it can all be done with a single catalog.
    See this:Adobe Lightroom - Find moved or missing files and folders

  • Sudoers and sudo installation config questions

    Hello, I am not sure if this is the right forum. I will try asking this anyway. I am trying to configure, install sudoers on a single system. I am not sure how to do that. do I need to install a Package on my Solaris 9 machine. Any info is appreciated

    Go to sunfreeware and get the latest copy of the sudo package and just install it. The sudoers file will be in /usr/local/etc/ Edit it with /usr/local/sbin/visudo.

  • RV220W, VPN client, and Full Tunnel vs Split Tunnel capabilities

    For an RV220W, which VPN client mode (of the three possibilities) supports which Tunnel mode? 
    This is mostly a question, and partly "in use" observations.
    Background: I have been able to get all three different VPN clients to work with an RV220W, but only one of the three works in "Full Tunnel"  mode (SSL VPN). And since I know one of the three -- the Cisco QuickVPN client -- will never with in that mode, do we know if an RV220W will with an IPSec client in Full Tunnel Mode? 
    If anyone answers yes, the next question will be vpn client and how did you configure it, client and RV220W, to make full tunnel work.
    Summary of VPN modes I've gotten to work with an RV220W:
    Client
    Split Tunnel Works?
    Full Tunnel Works?
    OS?
    Notes
    SSL VPN
    Yes
    Yes
    Win7/64
    IE10 or IE11
    QuickVPN
    Yes
    No
    Win7/64
    IPSec VPN
    Yes
    No
    Win7/64
    Shrew Soft VPN Client

    I have to mark this as not a correct answer.
    Reason: 0.0.0.0 will not go into either of the fields listed above, message is "Invalid IP address Please enter a value between 1 - 223 at xxx.0.0.0.".
    To Michal Bruncko who posted this:
    1.) 0.0.0.0 will not work in my router nor in the RV220W online emulator here, (general emulator page here), am I missing something obvious?
    2.) Have you used these actual settings on your router, or did you answer in a theoretical, "this should work" way?

Maybe you are looking for