Status profile not allowed for object type

hi
i had created a status profile (for having 2 statuses before production order release) and assigned in the order type.
but while creating the production order i receive the following error.
Message no - CO622
status profile not allowed for object type
please provide your inputs
regards
Ramesh

Ramesh,
once you cerate a Status profile in BS02 and add status to the same. in the tollbar you will see OBJECT TYPE push button, select teh obejcts like PP/PM order header / operation /comepeoent and PRT ect where that staus can be applied.
Then assign the statsu profile to order type.

Similar Messages

Method 'PROCESS' is not defined for object type 'BUS2081'

Hi All,
I am using a workflow for incoming invoice approval using WS20001004. I prepared one version for this. The standard business methos bus2081 i delegated to zbus2081. Here i placed one decision step for reject or approve. In the same task in inbox i can see the document i can see as attachment. Now the issue is after seeing the attachment when i click on task in my inbox it status is changed to red and i can not process it further.In log i can see the error like Method 'PROCESS' is not defined for object type 'BUS2081'. This method i do not have in standard or in delegated one. I was struck here. Pleas help in this.
Regards,
Madhu.

Hi,
"Here i placed one decision step for reject or approve." if your workitem is based on standard user decision step type of workflow, then the business object in underlying task should be 'DECISION' and method should be 'PROCESS'. I think in the task you have put your custom business object instead of business object 'DECISION'. This could be the reason you are facing error.
Regards,
Ibrahim

Event 'INFO_APPRAISEE_CHANGE_APPROVE' is not defined for object type

hi all
i made 4 workflows for MBO appraisal using APPR_DOC BO nd using std wfs- ws12300114, ws12300122, ws12300124 nd ws12300125. all r working properly in development server.
but
in quality all r giving errors related to evevts. as for example, for ws12300114 workflow it is giving error--
"Event 'INFO_APPRAISEE_CHANGE_APPROVE' is not defined for object type"
for all 4 wfs it is giving error like this related to event nd business object.
plzzzzzzzz anybody knows thn reply or call me at 09886999122 or mail at [email protected]
thanks in advance
Raj

Hi,
Since you are saying that the object worked fine in DEV and giving problem in Quality I feel that some sort of Your Dev work was not properly included in the Transport Request and was not gone to Quality server.
Something like EVENT activation, release status etc were not gone to Quality
check them.
reward if useful
regards,
Anji

"Event 'INFO_APPRAISEE_CHANGE_APPROVE' is not defined for object type 'APPR

hi all
i made 4 workflows for MBO appraisal using APPR_DOC BO nd using std wfs- ws12300114, ws12300122, ws12300124 nd ws12300125. all r working properly in development server.
but
in quality all r giving errors related to evevts. as for example, for ws12300114 workflow it is giving error--
"Event 'INFO_APPRAISEE_CHANGE_APPROVE' is not defined for object type 'APPR_DOC' "
for all 4 wfs it is giving error like this related to event nd business object.
plzzzzzzzz anybody knows thn reply or call me at 09886999122 or mail at [email protected]
thanks in advance
Raj

Hi,
Since you are saying that the object worked fine in DEV and giving problem in Quality I feel that some sort of Your Dev work was not properly included in the Transport Request and was not gone to Quality server.
Something like EVENT activation, release status etc were not gone to Quality
check them.
reward if useful
regards,
Anji

Set type COMM_PR_UNIT is not allowed for product type

Hello all, I am working in SRM 7.0 and when I try to replicate service master (DNL_CUST_SRVMAS) I have this error:
Set type COMM_PR_UNIT is not allowed for product type
What can I do? I think that is an ABAP problem
Thanks in advance
Rosa Rodríguez

Rosa,
This note is something different and nothing to do with the issue. Can you share how did you resolve the DNL_CUST_SRVMAS issue? We are also getting same error.
Thanks,
Jagadish

Value 'defaultNs:AddBP2Type' is not allowed for attribute 'type'

Hi All,
I created the wsdl for mobile and I tried to send a SOAP request from Altova XMLSpy. However when I geive the wsdl in 'wsdl file location' I receive the following.
File http://127.0.0.1:8080/B1iXcellerator/exec/dummy/com.sap.b1i.vplatform.scenarios.setup/vPac.sap.B1Mobile/001sap0003_sap.B1Mobile.wsdl is not valid.
Invalid XML schema: 'Value 'defaultNs:AddBP2Type' is not allowed for attribute 'type'.'
Error location: wsdl:definitions / wsdl:types / xs:schema / xs:element / @type
Any Idea?
Vangelis

Hi,
it seems that Altove did not cope with defaultNs prefix that is used for marking default namespace.
just look up in your <xs:schema > tag what namespace prefix is used for your namespace - you shall find there something like this
<xs:schema xmlns:ns0="your.namespace.com" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified"
and replace prefix defaultNs with prefix of your namespace (in example above it would be ns0)
There might be several usages of defalutNs iside of WSDL (at least in my case were two) so replace it everywhere using same approach
Best regards, Artem

Transaction CLM1 not allowed for notification type QL

Hello guys,
one of our user try to open the transaction CLM1/CLM2/CLM3 he getting error message Transaction CLM1 not allowed for notification type QL
please any one give solution for this issue.
find the error screen shot for your reference.
Thanks
Surya

Hello Surya,
Have you done Basic configuration for Claims processing in SAP Project System.
SPRO > Project System > Claim > Notification - Claim > Notification creation
Also check config for Settings for Claims.
Refer sap help for more details
SAP Library - Claim Management
Regards
Tushar

Transaction QM03 not allowed for notification type MQ

HI Dears,
The following error is appearing when i want to view my notification created through defects
Transaction QM03 not allowed for notification type MQ
How to rectify it ?
Alagesan

Hi,
Check IQS3 transaction also....
Cheers,
Tushar

SAP MM Rounding Profile not allowed for plant in sales org data 1-Quantity stipulation

Hi
I have created rounding profile in OWD1 for a particular plant and it is showing IN material master MRP DATA1 area. But when i am trying to assign in sales :sales org1 data under quantity stipulation area there is no profile . Is there any specific plant assignment for sales area data?
Kindly guide me.
Ganesh

Hi,
The material master sales data 1 is not plant specific generally. You may create a rounding profile in OWD1 without plant and then the same will be visible in the F4 list in sales data 1. If the rounding profile is plant specific, you have to maintain the delivering plant in material master - sales data 1.
Regards,
AKPT

Method not defined for object

Hello,
When I look into one of the standard tasks in my wf, this message appears:
"Method 'POPUPCONTABLE' is not defined for object type 'ZBUS2081'"
This problem happens in Test (Quality - QAS) environment, but not in Development (DEV). So I have activated and generated the object type in DEV and then generated again the whole wf, and included it all into a transport request.
After the requests were released and imported in QAS these modifications apparently did not take place, and the method is still unrecognized for that object.
How could I make sure that this change will be included in the requests? And, is this approach right (activating the object type)?
Appreciate your suggestions,
Best regards,
Ivson
Note: There are other/similar methods in that object type, in the same wf, that work ok.

Hi Ivson,
The transport system can be a bit flaky, though to be fair it can get quite complex. What it tries to do in the case of interdependent objects is to attempt activation of one thing, then reactivate the other and go back and reactivate any failed ones.
There are a few notes on OSS regarding transports and you'll see a few recommendations to simply retransport things if they failed. One way to minimize problems is to transport objects and code first, then workflows, then customizing.
As to delegation, you said 'other attributes work' so I assumed you'd delegated. What you should be doing is creating a delegation from BUS2081 to ZBUS2081. This is effectively the reverse of inheritance and makes all your additional components in the Z-object available as part of the BUS...-obj. In your workflows you should then ONLY work with BUS2081.
Cheers,
Mike

ESS Business Package Error: Period type not allowed for profile ESS

Hi,
We are trying to configure the business package for Employee Self Service on Enterprise Portal 6.0. We followed this SDN contribution <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/21eb036a-0a01-0010-25a3-b2224432640a">ESS doc guide</a>
So far we have successfully deployed the business packages and followed all the configurations that were pointed out in the doc guide. Unfortunately when we try to access the Employee Self-Service portal pages (Overview, Employee Search, etc), we encounter this error:
Critical Error:
Period type not allowed for profile ESS, error key: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE
com.sap.tc.webdynpro.modelimpl.dynamicrfc.WDDynamicRFCExecuteException: Period type not allowed for profile ESS, error key: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE
Any ideas on how to fix this issue?
Regards,
Jojo

Hi Jojo,
Have you solved the problem? If yes can you please help me even I am facing the same error.
this is very help full to me .
Thanks and Regards,
Shilpi.

Partitioned IOT of Object Type - mapping table not allowed for bitmap index

Hi,
looks like a feature available for standard Partitioned IOTs is not supported for object based tables, namely the MAPPING TABLE construct to support secondary local bitmap indexes.
Can you confirm behaviour is as expected/documented?
If so, is a fix/enhancement to support mapping table for object-based Partitioned IOTs in the pipeline?
Results for partition-wise load using pipelined table function are very good, look-ups across tens of millions of rows are excellent.
Environment = Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
OS = Oracle Enterprise Linux Server release 5.2 (Carthage) 2.6.18 92.el5 (32-bit)
Here's the potted test-case...
1) First the non object based Partitioned IOT - data is range-partitioned across the alphabet
CREATE TABLE IOT_Table (
textData VARCHAR2(10),
numberData NUMBER(10,0),
CONSTRAINT IOT_Table_PK PRIMARY KEY(textData))
ORGANIZATION INDEX MAPPING TABLE PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire
PARTITION BY RANGE (textData)
(PARTITION Text_Part_A VALUES LESS THAN ('B') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_B VALUES LESS THAN ('C') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_C VALUES LESS THAN ('D') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_D VALUES LESS THAN ('E') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_E VALUES LESS THAN ('F') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_F VALUES LESS THAN ('G') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_G VALUES LESS THAN ('H') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_H VALUES LESS THAN ('I') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_I VALUES LESS THAN ('J') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_J VALUES LESS THAN ('K') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_K VALUES LESS THAN ('L') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_L VALUES LESS THAN ('M') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_M VALUES LESS THAN ('N') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_N VALUES LESS THAN ('O') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_O VALUES LESS THAN ('P') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_P VALUES LESS THAN ('Q') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_Q VALUES LESS THAN ('R') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_R VALUES LESS THAN ('S') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_S VALUES LESS THAN ('T') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_T VALUES LESS THAN ('U') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_U VALUES LESS THAN ('V') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_V VALUES LESS THAN ('W') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_W VALUES LESS THAN ('X') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_X VALUES LESS THAN ('Y') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_Y VALUES LESS THAN ('Z') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_Z VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE) PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0))
NOLOGGING PARALLEL -- FLASHBACK ARCHIVE IOT_Flashback_Data
SQL> table IOT_TABLE created.
2) Create the local secondary bitmap index utilising the underlying mapping table
CREATE BITMAP INDEX IOT_Table_BMI1 ON IOT_Table (numberData)
LOCAL STORAGE (INITIAL 1M PCTINCREASE 0 NEXT 512K) NOLOGGING PARALLEL;
SQL> bitmap index IOT_TABLE_BMI1 created.
3) Quick test to confirm all ok
SQL> INSERT INTO IOT_Table VALUES ('ABC123',100);
SQL> 1 rows inserted.
SQL> SELECT * FROM IOT_Table;
TEXTDATA NUMBERDATA
ABC123     100
4) Now create a minimal object type to use as the template for object table
CREATE TYPE IOT_type AS OBJECT
textData VARCHAR2(10 CHAR),
numberData NUMBER(10,0)
) FINAL
SQL> TYPE IOT_type compiled
5) Attempt to create an object-based range partitioned IOT, including MAPPING TABLE clause as per step (1)
CREATE TABLE IOTObj_Table OF IOT_type (textData PRIMARY KEY)
OBJECT IDENTIFIER IS PRIMARY KEY ORGANIZATION INDEX
MAPPING TABLE -- we'd like to use this feature to enable use of Bitmap Indexes...
PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire
PARTITION BY RANGE (textData)
(PARTITION Text_Part_A VALUES LESS THAN ('B') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_B VALUES LESS THAN ('C') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_C VALUES LESS THAN ('D') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_D VALUES LESS THAN ('E') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_E VALUES LESS THAN ('F') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_F VALUES LESS THAN ('G') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_G VALUES LESS THAN ('H') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_H VALUES LESS THAN ('I') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_I VALUES LESS THAN ('J') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_J VALUES LESS THAN ('K') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_K VALUES LESS THAN ('L') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_L VALUES LESS THAN ('M') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_M VALUES LESS THAN ('N') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_N VALUES LESS THAN ('O') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_O VALUES LESS THAN ('P') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_P VALUES LESS THAN ('Q') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_Q VALUES LESS THAN ('R') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_R VALUES LESS THAN ('S') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_S VALUES LESS THAN ('T') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_T VALUES LESS THAN ('U') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_U VALUES LESS THAN ('V') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_V VALUES LESS THAN ('W') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_W VALUES LESS THAN ('X') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_X VALUES LESS THAN ('Y') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_Y VALUES LESS THAN ('Z') PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0),
PARTITION Text_Part_Z VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE) PCTFREE 0 TABLESPACE Firewire Storage (Initial 10M Next 1M PCTIncrease 0))
NOLOGGING PARALLEL -- FLASHBACK ARCHIVE IOT_Flashback_Data
This errors out with the following...
SQL Error: ORA-25182: feature not currently available for index-organized tables
25182. 00000 - "feature not currently available for index-organized tables"
*Cause:    An attempt was made to use one or more of the following feature(s) not
currently supported for index-organized tables:
CREATE TABLE with LOB/BFILE/VARRAY columns,
partitioning/PARALLEL/CREATE TABLE AS SELECT options,
ALTER TABLE with ADD/MODIFY column options, CREATE INDEX
*Action:   Do not use the disallowed feature(s) in this release.
6) Re-running the create table statement in step 5 without the MAPPING TABLE clause works fine. Not surprisingly an attempt to create a secondary local bitmap index on this table fails as there's no mapping table, like so...
CREATE BITMAP INDEX IOTObj_Table_BMI1 ON IOTObj_Table (numberData)
LOCAL STORAGE (INITIAL 1M PCTINCREASE 0 NEXT 512K) NOLOGGING PARALLEL;
CREATE TABLE with LOB/BFILE/VARRAY columns,
partitioning/PARALLEL/CREATE TABLE AS SELECT options,
ALTER TABLE with ADD/MODIFY column options, CREATE INDEX
*Action:   Do not use the disallowed feature(s) in this release.
CREATE BITMAP INDEX IOTObj_Table_BMI1 ON IOTObj_Table (numberData)
LOCAL STORAGE (INITIAL 1M PCTINCREASE 0 NEXT 512K) NOLOGGING PARALLEL
Error at Command Line:99 Column:13
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-00903: invalid table name
00903. 00000 - "invalid table name"
7) Creating a secondary local b-tree index is fine, like so...
SQL> CREATE INDEX IOTObj_Table_I1 ON IOTObj_Table (numberData)
LOCAL STORAGE (INITIAL 1M PCTINCREASE 0 NEXT 512K) NOLOGGING PARALLEL;
index IOTOBJ_TABLE_I1 created.
8) A quick test to ensure object table ok...
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('DEF456',500));
SQL> 1 rows inserted.
SQL> SELECT * FROM IOTObj_Table;
TEXTDATA NUMBERDATA
DEF456     500

Thanks Dan,
the intention is to range partition based on the initial character, so A* -> Text_Part_A, B* -> Text_Part_B, and so on.
Here's an example, using an empty IOTObj_Table as created previously.
1) Set up & confirm some test data (two 'D's, one 'N', and two 'Z's)
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('DEF456',500));
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('DDD111',510));
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('N3000',515));
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('ZZ1212',520));
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('Z111X',530));
SQL> COMMIT;
SQL> SELECT * FROM IOTObj_Table;
TEXTDATA NUMBERDATA
DDD111     510
DEF456     500
N3000     515
Z111X     530
ZZ1212     520
2) Just to prove our IOT is enforcing the Primary Key based on the TextData attribute, try to insert a duplicate
SQL> INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('Z111X',530));
Error starting at line 141 in command:
INSERT INTO IOTObj_Table VALUES (IOT_Type('Z111X',530))
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-00001: unique constraint (OCDataSystems.SYS_IOT_TOP_84235) violated
00001. 00000 - "unique constraint (%s.%s) violated"
*Cause:    An UPDATE or INSERT statement attempted to insert a duplicate key.
For Trusted Oracle configured in DBMS MAC mode, you may see
this message if a duplicate entry exists at a different level.
*Action:   Either remove the unique restriction or do not insert the key.
3) Now confirm that our data has been slotted into the range-based partition we expect using the PARTITION clause of SELECT...
- The two 'D's...
SQL> SELECT * FROM IOTObj_Table PARTITION (Text_Part_D);
TEXTDATA NUMBERDATA
DDD111     510
DEF456     500
- The single 'N'...
SQL> SELECT * FROM IOTObj_Table PARTITION (Text_Part_N);
TEXTDATA NUMBERDATA
N3000     515
- The two 'Z's...
SQL> SELECT * FROM IOTObj_Table PARTITION (Text_Part_Z);
TEXTDATA NUMBERDATA
Z111X     530
ZZ1212     520
4) And to wrap up confirm an empty partition
SELECT * FROM IOTObj_Table PARTITION (Text_Part_W);

ABAP Dictionary type FLTP is not allowed for screen element

Hi Experts
I tried to open VBFA in se16 and i got the message in the status bar like this , what does it mean. please explain.
"ABAP Dictionary type FLTP is not allowed for screen element"

Hi,
This is from help
ABAP Dictionary type FLTP is not allowed for screen element
Message no. 37048
Diagnosis
The format of the ABAP Dictionary field is only for use within the ABAP
program and cannot be used in the Screen Painter.
Procedure
The field cannot be used in screens. If you want to output the
information in the field or assign a value to the field from the screen,
you must use an intermediate field with an appropriate format.
Reward points
Regards

Create Synonym for Object Type not supported; Why?

Does anybody know the reason why Oracle does not support the creation of synonyms for object types?
In our application we use many schemas to separate subsystems. The schema name has a version identifier included to allow multiple product versions loaded in the database at the same time.
We reference objects between schemas by using synonyms, to avoid hardcoding the schema names.
Therefore I must refrain from using object types, currently.
Does anybody have such a multi-schema architecture, also?
What is your experience?
Thanks,
Robert

Robert,
Type synonym is now supported in Oracle9i Release 2. The practice of using multi-schema architecture is an excellent practice for large applications. This provides a level of abstraction to simplify application maintenance, whihc you must have experienced. In conjuction with Object types, you can further simplify your application through reuse of user-defined types.
Do you have an email address that I can contact you for further discussion off-line.
Regards,
Geoff
Does anybody know the reason why Oracle does not support the creation of synonyms for object types?
In our application we use many schemas to separate subsystems. The schema name has a version identifier included to allow multiple product versions loaded in the database at the same time.
We reference objects between schemas by using synonyms, to avoid hardcoding the schema names.
Therefore I must refrain from using object types, currently.
Does anybody have such a multi-schema architecture, also?
What is your experience?
Thanks,
Robert

XML failure with ASN no Process DELIVERY_INFO_GR for ASN in status is not allowed

Hi All,
In production , we are having many XML failures while sending inbound delivery to SNC from ECC.
In SXMB_Moni, ASN XXXX: Process DELIVERY_INFO_GR for ASN in status is not allowed. Becasue ASN is not exist in SNC but in ECC GR status is complete.
Please help to resolve the same.
Regards,
Sheetal

Hi,
Please go the tcode CO02 and click on functions and select the restrict processingand click on unlock
the reason may be tht some might have locked the produvtion order ,
hopw it wud have answered ur question.
rewards if it is useful
Shawn

Status profile not allowed for object type

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for