STO SCENARIO

I am facing a problem in STO Scenario,
After preparing a Delivery Document and MIGO is done in another plant, If I cancel the MIGO Document the reversed document is not updating in the Document flow of Delivery document. Whereas I trying the same in Development Server Reversed document is updating in Document Flow of Delivery Document.
Please suggest where configuration is missing in Production.
Regards,
Sandeep

Hi
Check if Note 1499411 - GR reversal for stock transport order and document flow happens.
Regards
Eduardo

Similar Messages

  • Problem in GRN while Capturing Excise Invoice in Cross Company STO Scenario

    Dear All,
    In the Cross Company STO Scenario we are following the steps as below:-
    1.) Creation of the purchase order to the supplying plant of type u201CNBu201D
    2.) Creation of the Outbound delivery in VL10B
    3.) Post Good Issue in the VL02N.
    4.) Creation of the billing doc.
    5.) Creation of the Excise Invoice.
    6.) MIGO w.r.t to the Outbound delivery in the receiving plant
    During MIGO ,initialy system is picking the excise rates and excise base value by its own from the purchase order and the moment  when we refer the Excise Excise Invoice created in the supplying plant , system takes the Excise rates from the excise invoice created in the supplying plant and Excise Base value is becoming ZERO and we are getting the error :u201D *Please check excise base for the item is ZERO
    Message no : 4F121
    Please Suggest what to do and why this error is coming.
    When I am giving any other Excise no is the Excise Invoice feild in MIGO , it is taking and refering the rates in PO and giving one information message that Excise invoice no is different from the supplying plant excise invoice no.
    Thanks & Regards
    Nitin

    HI,
    Check the excise base vlaue in the Supplying plant excise invoice. If its 0, maintain the assessible value in J1ID & Check.
    If everything is found OK,  check if any SAP notes are available.
    Thanks & Regards,

  • Error in cross company STO scenario

    Hi All,
    We have a cross company STO scenario. When I try to create the PO (document type NB) I get an error that
    "Customer XYZ does not exist (please change entry in plant ABCD)"
    I have rightly assigned the customer XYZ to the plant ABCD as required in the IMG node Set up for stock transport order. Also the customer XYZ has been created. But I don't know why the system gives this error even when the customer has been created properly.
    After debugging I found that this is because of some missing value in the field CCOMP (Stock tranfer category) in the EKPO table.
    What is this stock transfer category? Am I missing some configuration here?
    Regards,
    V S

    Hi,
    Please check the following details;
    Material should exist in both the plants (Delivering  & Ordering),
    Internal customer should be assigned to the ordering plant ( MM -> Purchasing -> Purchase Order -> Setup stock transport order -> assign the internal customer to the ordering plant and assign the Sales area of the internal customer.
    Assign its Sales area to the delivering plant
    Assign the document type and Delivery type  NB and NLCC
    Assign the Supplying plant --> Receiving Plant --> NB
    Take the delivering plant and assign the sales area.
    Vendor master has to be created and assaign the supply source ( Delivering Plant).
    Create a puchase order ME21N ---> Save
    Regards,
    Tushar Patankar

  • License Update in FT STO Scenario

    Hi,
    In the Foreign trade STO scenario is a product is governed by legal regulation license check happens during STO delivery but the license master is not updated. Apparently License master update is not supported by standard SAP functionality in STO scenario unlike the normal order to cash cycle.In this case we are using quantity based license.
    Could you please let me know if there is a workaround by using user exits or by function module to fullfill the license master update.
    Look forward to your response asap.

    Thanks Venkat,
    Good point. How it works in case I want all POs(except STO) to subject SPL and Embargo but only STOs(as you said exports) for all three services like SPL, Embargo and License determination.
    I don't have flexibility in GTS at document type level activation for services level like SPL, Emb, License det seperately.
    In ECC to ensure that STO documents are passed to GTS, I have to specify FUB at MM0A application level and I don't have FUB at SD0A application level.
    Then how does it knows that only FUB(STOs) subject to license and NOT FNB(POs)?
    Thanks,
    Chakri

  • Intercompany STO Scenario

    Hi Friends,
    We have the following 2 Stage Intercompany STO scenario from Plant XX01(Co. Code XX99) to Plant XX04 (Co. Code XX05)
    1) PO is created with vendor as Plant XX01 and recieving plant as XX04
    2) Outbound Delivery is created
    3) PGI Done - 643 movement type
    4) BIlling Done
    5) PGR done in the receiving plant - movement type 101 through MIGO
    6) Invoice Verification through MIRO
    Now we have to suggest the possible ways to reverse this goods movement and move goods back from Plant XX04 to Plant XX01.
    One possible way which came to my mind instantly is to create another Intercompany STO scenario where goods would move back to the first plant.
    Another way could be to create a returns delivery.
    Request for your valuable inputs and suggestion for handling this requirement.
    Thanks & Regards
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Dec 24, 2011 10:09 PM
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Dec 24, 2011 10:57 PM

    Hi Friends,
    We have the following 2 Stage Intercompany STO scenario from Plant XX01(Co. Code XX99) to Plant XX04 (Co. Code XX05)
    1) PO is created with vendor as Plant XX01 and recieving plant as XX04
    2) Outbound Delivery is created
    3) PGI Done - 643 movement type
    4) BIlling Done
    5) PGR done in the receiving plant - movement type 101 through MIGO
    6) Invoice Verification through MIRO
    Now we have to suggest the possible ways to reverse this goods movement and move goods back from Plant XX04 to Plant XX01.
    One possible way which came to my mind instantly is to create another Intercompany STO scenario where goods would move back to the first plant.
    Another way could be to create a returns delivery.
    Request for your valuable inputs and suggestion for handling this requirement.
    Thanks & Regards
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Dec 24, 2011 10:09 PM
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Dec 24, 2011 10:57 PM

  • Does APO support the simplified CrossCompany STO scenario from ECC ?

    Hello experts,
    I'm seeking for some short infos around using / support of the "single document CrossCompany StockTransfer Order" process from ECC and whether this can be used within APO. If someone has some experience with this I would be happy to hear any feedback on this.
    The starting point is that we use today an APO planning process for cross company replenishment via the famous 2-documents flow (IC PurchOrder --> IC SalesOrder) and we wanted to check if APO-SNP can support the simplified STO scenario. The "beauty" of course is that you only have a single document to deal with in an intercompany process.
    Can SNP create STO PReqs (is this only depenend on the source-of-supply definition in the vendor master in ECC) ?
    Can SNP Deployment process such SNP STO PReqs at a hub location ("fair share" at supplying plant)?
    Can TLB by used at a Hub to turn such "deployed" STO PReqs into STO PurchOrders in ECC ?
    Is the fcst consumption of such STOs working in the supplying plant side ?
    Are there any serious / known limitations working with STO in APO (using Interchangeability, using GATP in the supplying plant side to perform rescheduling by BOP on these STOs etc.)
    Thanks for any hints or experience sharing !
    Regards
    Thomas

    Hi Frank,
    thanks for the detailed info - this helps to find a way thru the larger documentation. In regards to applying / testing the RDS we will check getting an SCM sandbox "on-hand".
    Beside this I started searching OSS on my initial question - note 1284461 - Release Restrictions for SAP SCM 7.0 seems have some items to around using  "STO" in APO SNP & GATP (see below).
    Another note explicitely defines how to get the right "SourceOfSupply" definition into APO for the STO sceanrio: 1623475
    So, what is basically left open for me is:
    * is TLB correctly working using "SNP Deployed STOs" ?
    * at the supplying plant of the STO (typically a central DC) - is GATP able to catch at least demand of such STOs for ATP qty consideration
    Regards
    Thomas
    Stock Transport Order and product interchangeability
    The functionality of product interchangeability in Stock Transport Orders (STO)s
    will not support
    - purchasing requisitions and scheduling agreements
    - old purchase transaction e.g. ME21
    .. the handling in case of inconsistencies between confirmed quantity in STO/delivery
    and real quantity in warehouse at time of goods issue can only be resolved as
    follows:
    - Either deletion and recreation of STO and delivery
    or
    - post goods issue with #real# quantity (reduce delivered quantity), post goods receipt and
    set delivery complete indicator, correct situation in warehouse, create new STO
    item.
    Backorder processing for Stock Transfer Orders - Rescheduling
    The rescheduling for Stock Transfer Orders is done in LC during the update.
    Rescheduling is supported during Backorder processing (BOP) but the results are
    only consistent with LC scheduling if Configurable Process Scheduling (CPS) is
    used.

  • Shipment HU in STO scenario

    Hi experts,
    Is there a shipment type to use or something to have a shipment that can be load in one plant and unload in the other plant in a STO scenario
    Thanks

    Hi Mariana,
    In a Stock transfer scenario, a transport order is created followed
    by a replenishment delivery (outbound). Then a outbound transport
    is needed in VT01n.
    regards, david

  • Sto scenario plz help urgent

    Under company code 7245 I m doing stock transfer from 7245 plant to 7246 plant
    supplying plant 7245 recieving plant 7246 ccode 7245
    n sales area in supplying plant is 7245-7a-7a
    now in this sales area ive created a customer 7246 to represent recieving plant
    on the oher side in 7246 ive created vendor 7245
    now in
    SPROMMPO-SET UP STOSHIPPING DATA
    for plant 7246 ive given cust num plant:7246 sales area 72457a7a
    and
    for plant 7245 ive kept cust num plant blank
    and sales area 72457a7a
    n shipping point det in 7246 cust mast shipping cond is 7a
    loading group in material is 7245 for plant 7245
    and for material in 7246 the lopading group is 7246
    the shipping pt det is as follows
    7a-724572457245(shipping cond-loading group-plant-shipping point)
    now when i m creating po in me21n
    i m getting warning message
    ship point 7245 not allowed for ship cond 7a loading group 7245 plant 7245
    its only a warning
    but it is picking up 7245 as shipping point
    now vl10g is also fine
    i m getting the delivery doc number
    n vl02n and migo is fine
    now
    my doubt is
    wat r the settings so that i can do both ways
    see with the above setting i m able to send stock frm 7245 plant to 7246
    but i m not able to configure stock transfer from 7246 to 7245
    mainly i wan settings @ SPROMMPO-SET UP STOSHIPPING DATA
    i ve created customer 7245 in 7246-7a-7a
    and vendor 7245 in purch org 7246
    cant be both settings be standard
    so that stock can be sent any ways
    because both plants belong to same ccode and stock can be ransfered both ways,is this scenario possible??/
    or sto is only one way ??
    plz clarify
    i ve already spent a lot of time on this plz help me out.
    anil
    Edited by: anil singh on Mar 12, 2008 5:37 PM

    Hi,
    Create the customer in the delivering Sales Area/Plant/CC and assign this customer to the recieving plant in the MM> purchasing> STO> Setup STO> Shipping data for plants.
    Assign the delivering plant's salea area also here. So you need to create a customer in 7245 and assigne it in 7246.
    Create the vendor in the purchase organisation of the receiving plant and assgin the delivering plant in the vendor master. Maintain the document types correctly and define whether you require one step or two step procedure.
    hope this will help.
    Prase

  • STO SCENARIO( Plant to Plant)

    Dear All,
    I have an scenario where I want a additional accounting entry to consumption account ( Credit to Issuing plant consumption a/c and Debit to receiving Plant consumption a/c ) beside whatever entries( Stock - A/c recieving Plant - Db
    Stock - A/c Issueing Plant - Cr) been passed in standard system.
    This is client requirement and i have to do it please help me out.
    Thank & Regards
    AJIT K SINGH

    Hiiii
    if you want to debit the receiving plnat then you have to create on branch customer code and assign the same in STO configuration, SPRO------> Material Management -
    > Purchasing -
    >Purchase Order -
    Stock Transport Order -Shipping data for STO ,  assign here your Branch customer for Determing Shipping data. System will debit the Brach customer Reco Account. (Receiving Plant). Now for consumption you have to create one G/L account and assign in VKOA for credit in STO process.
    Regards
    Shambhu Sarakar

  • Sales office and sales group in STO scenario

    We need to populate the sales group and sales office in intercompany billing originating from a STO (PO>STOdelivery>IV invoice). However, the sales office and sales group is blank despite both the customer masters of both plant customer (shipto) and Intercompany Payer (ininvoice) containing this. Wanted to understand any configaration settings for these or Userexit is the only option
    regards
    Nagappa

    If you can, try & maintain the Sales Office & Sales Group in sold to party.
    But as per my knowledge in billing you can only find Sales district.
    Regards
    JP

  • Automatic excise invoice creation in STO scenario

    Hi All,
    This is related to stock transfer from Depot to manufacturing plant.
    I have done the replenishment delivery at Depot. Now my requirement is automatic excise invoice creation. For that i have done the required settings like excise and series group. I have checked the Creation EI option in exciser group also.
    PO(ME21n) --> VL10B --> VL02N --> VF01 (JEX) --> Automatic excise invoice once save the billing.
    Once  i sqve the billing, it has to create excise invoice at Depot. It is not happining.
    Please let me know if i have to do any more settings.
    Regards
    Lakshmikanth

    Dear Lakki,
    Please check, whether for Defined Excise Group:
    Path: SPRO --> IMG --> Logistics General --> Tax on Goods Movement --> India --> Basic Settings --> Maintain Excise Group
    Select your Excise Group and Mark the Boxes: Create EI, and Box: Depot EIs.
    Have you maintained relevant setings, like:
    --> Had you checked the Box: Excise Inv during Billing, under Tab: Outgoing Excise Invoice
    --> Relevant checks for Depot Settings, under Tab: Depot Settings
    Best Regards,
    Amit

  • Movement type for goods issue in intercompany STO business scenario

    Hi, everyone,
    In intercompany STO scenario, firstly we should create a purchase order with a transfer order type just like as UB,
    then we use T-code: VL10B to create the delivery note by referencing the purchase order created in first step, in succession, billing, goods reciept.
    Actually I have a question about the movement type in goods issue process. The standard is 643 deliveried by SAP.
    Can I customize the movement type in intercompany STO business scenario

    hi,
    The following are the scenarios of cross plant goods movements:
    Alternate plant procurement of purchased items
    Alternate plant production
    Plant-to-plant goods transfer of grouped project stock
    Stock transfer without reference to a stock transfer order (STO)
    1 Step – 301
    1 Step reversal – 302
    Stock transfer with reference to an STO in the receiving plant without SD
    2 Steps - 351 and 101
    2 Steps reversal – 102 and 352
    Stock transfer with reference to an STO in the receiving plant with SD delivery
    2 Steps – 641 and 101
    2 Steps reversal – 102 and 642
    1 Step – 647
    1 Step reversal – 648
    Movement Type &  Description
    301 / 302
    Goods receipt into production order in another plant. This is a one-step, cross-plant stock transfer. This movement type does not use STOs but behaves like a goods receipt of stock, except that the stock comes from another plant into the current plant. Movement 302 is the reverse of 301.
    351 / 352
    Stock transfer that is in transit between two plants. This is a two–step, cross-plant stock transfer, because after movement 351, you do not immediately see the stock in the receiving plant. After movement 351, the stock is in transit between the two plants. Only after you have performed a goods receipt (movement 101/102)of this ”in-transit” stock into the receiving plant can you see this stock in the receiving plant. Movement 352 is the reverse of 351.
    641 / 642
    Stock transfer that is in transit between two plants, with delivery documents (Sales and Distribution). This is a two-step, cross-plant transfer of stock, because after movement 641, you do not immediately see the stock in the receiving plant. After movement 641, the stock is in transit between the two plants. Only after you have performed a goods receipt (movement 101/102 ) of this ”in-transit” stock into the receiving plant can you see this stock in the receiving plant. Movement 642 is the reverse of 641.
    647 / 648
    Stock transfer to another plant, with delivery documents (Sales and Distribution), with STO. This is a one-step, cross-plant stock transfer because after movement 647, you cannot immediately see the stock in the receiving plant. The stock is never in transit with this movement type, but the stock is transferred with reference to an STO with Sales and Distribution documents. Movement 648 is the reverse of 647.
    regards,
    Siddharth

  • STO applicablity for interplant Scenario

    Hi all,
    We have two plants, plant A and B in same company code. When selling is done from plant B stock is coming from plant A. Is Inter Company STO scenario justified when no selling or purchasing is taking place between the Plants

    Hello,
    SAP has provided number of procedures to enable you to transfer materials from one plant to another:
    :Stcok transfer between plants by One step procedure  using Transfer postg. using 301
    :Stock transfer between plnats by twp step procedure using movement type 303 for goods issue and 305 for goods reciept.
    :Stock Transport Order Without Delivery using movement type 351 for gods issue and 101 for goods reciept
    :Stock Transport Order with Delivery via Shipping using movement type 641 for goods issue and 101 for goods reciept.
    :Stock Transport Order with Delivery and Billing Document/Invoice using movement tyope 643 for goods issue and 101 for goods reciept.
    The transfer of stock using a stock transport order has the following advantages over the transfer of stock without a stock transport order:
    You can plan a  goods receipt at the receiving plant.
    You can enter a vendor (transport vendor) in the stock transport order.
    You can enter delivery costs  in the stock transport order.
    You can plan stock transfer using MRP, where you can create purchase requistion and then Stock transport purchase orders. orders.
    Also goods issue can be entered using a delivery via Shipping functionality.
    Also the goods receipt can be posted directly to consumption.
    The entire process can be monitored via the purchase order history.
    I hope SAP stock transport orders has definately clear edge over normal transfer posting within plants.
    Br,
    Tushar

  • STO - IDOC INVOIC - MM Receipt on Delivery note rather PO number

    Hi Gurus,
    I'm processing an MM Receipt INVOIC IDOC to create an Intercompany Vendor Invoice against a Purchase order.
    This is integrated in a standard Stock Transfer Order. This IDOC is generated using Output type RD04 from Intercompany billing.
    When SAP creates IDOC, it is based on the Delivery note number rather than the PO number, even I have the PO and Delivery in my PO historic, and even if I have IDOC segment E1EDP02 QUALF 001 with PO and segment E1EDP02 with QUALF 016 with Delivery note.
    I tried to managed PO item flags: "Invoice Receipt Indicator" or "Indicator: GR-Based Invoice Verification".
    But there is no impact.
    When I create the MM Receipt manually using TCode MIRO in reference to the PO. It works.
    When I create the MM Receipt manually using TCode MIRO in reference to the Delivery not. It doesn't work. I got the same error message "Delivery note/service entry sheet xxxx does not exist".
    I conclude that when SAP performs the IDOC, someting in the IDOC tells him to create a invoice in reference to the Delivery note rather than the PO. How can we change it?
    Please, could you help me to understand this blocking point and to allow to create the MM Receipt on PO?
    Many thanks.
    Stéphane.

    hello, friend.
    i am not an expert in MM, but....
    i noticed that when using MIGO, you can do GR based on an inbound delivery, and maybe also an outbound delivery (from STO).  an outbound delivery created in an STO scenario should have links to the STO related PO.  could this be the link you are looking for?
    regards.

  • Partial goods reversal in STO from goods in transit

    hi!
    what is the movement type we have to use  for partial reversal of goods in transit stock and move it to some cost centre in STO scenario ?whether this functionality available in SAP?
    Because if you use 557 MT,<>MB1A , stock in transit will be reduced (trxn mc.9/mb52) but if you run MB5T it will be showing stock without reduction ?
    Any sap release notes on this if any?
    right answers will be rightfully rewarded .
    thanks in advance for your time
    shankar gj

    not answered yet

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error while doing miro of network purchase order ( no funds center entered/

    Hi, we are facing one problem while doing miro of network  service purchase order. System is giving message 'No funds center entered/derived in item 00030'. We have activated funds management in Jul'10. The said network service PO belong to previous

  • Problem of opening pages 2.0 document in Macbook pro

    I have just downloaded ipad pages 2.0. I created a file and sent it by email, but it comes out as a pages.zip file and I cannot open it in pages 2009. What to do?

  • PDF Text Field Form Label

    Hello everyone.  I was wondering if there was a way to make a label viewable in normal mode for a PDF text field form.  I am making my PDF a form with a fillable text box in it.  Well, I'd like the box name to show up when someone opens the PDF, not

  • XmlMap Request with circle Geometry

    Hi all, i'm using MV Ver1033p5_B081010. Following Problem: We are working on an application using MV where users have the possibility to add redline-, rectangle- and/or circle-tools. All elements which are drawn by the user are added to the map as MV

  • Wishlist for future Nano

    Software: - Wider range of video codecs (DivX, Xvid, MKV) - FLAC audio codec !!! - Better base fidelity - Fingerprint recognition (or some kind of security option) - WiFi/Bluetooth network detection and info (just detection) in "Extras" - Procentage