Success but not Posted Process Scheduler

Hi all,
I just installed HCM 9.1 PT8.52, Demo DB, Oracle 11g Database and Windows server 2008.
I installed and configured the process scheduler (followed the steps) and created a windows service for it, that is 'Automatically started'.
When trying to run a process scheduler, I'm getting a run status 'Success' but the 'Distribution Status' is 'Not Posted'.
I suppose it is not finding the location or something?
What should I check?
Thanks.
Bechara

Thank you!
The ReportDistAdmin role was missing so I added it.
I shut down process scheduler and re-run it, but I'm still getting 'Not Posted'
Is there any additional step to do before trying the reports?
Update
And the password was missing in the default local node, I added it and it worked!
Thanks you Hakan!
Edited by: Bechara IS on Nov 8, 2012 3:39 AM

Similar Messages

Issue with Bulk Load Post Process Scheduled Task

Hello,
I successfully loaded users in OIM using the bulk load utility. I also have LDAP sync ON. The documentation says to run the Bulk Load Post Process scheduled task to push the loaded users in OIM into LDAP.
This works if we run the Bulk Load Post Process Scheduled Task right away after the run the bulk load.
If some time had passed and we go back to run the Bulk Load Post Process Scheduled Task, some of the users loaded through the bulk load utility are not created in our LDAP system. This created an off-sync situation between OIM and our LDAP.
I tried to use the usr_key as a parameter to the Bulk Load Post Process Scheduled Task without success.
Is there a way to force the re-evaluation of these users so they would get created in LDAP?
Thanks
Khanh

The scheduled task carries out post-processing activities on the users imported through the bulk load utility.

What is the Impact of just parking invoice doc's, but not posting...

I would like to know the risk/constrain involved with the below process, which may not be a standard practice.
1. Service Provider maintains Classic SRM/ECC. Customer maintains own ECC.
2. Shopping cart created in SRM and PO generated in ECC of Service provider.
3. PO transferred to Customer ECC. Invoice posting, Payment and FI activities are carried out in customer ECC.
4. Basic Invoice Information is transferred back to Service provider ECC, so this invoice will be shown as follow on document in the shopping cart. It will show only the invoice number and it is only for the informational purpose. There is neither finance activity nor any reporting are made out that system.
Service provider just want to Park the document and not to post it, so it won't hit the GL account. This eliminates considerable work FI configuration settings.
Question is whether this unorthodox method of just parking, but not posting will cause any impact/risk, even though no FI activities is carried on that system.

Hi,
'the invoice number and it is only for the informational purpose' and 'In future if we are planning to use any reporting from service provider', in this case of cause there will be a problem.
But, what Service provider going to do with Parked doc? In future if they're going to post it?I mean if they are have accounts payable why they don't post it?

Impact of just parking invoice doc, but not posting???

I would like to know the risk/constrain involved with the below process, which may not be a standard practice.
1. Service Provider maintains Classic SRM/ECC. Customer maintains own ECC.
2. Shopping cart created in SRM and PO generated in ECC of Service provider.
3. PO transferred to Customer ECC. Invoice posting, Payment and FI activities are carried out in customer ECC.
4. Basic Invoice Information is transferred back to Service provider ECC, so this invoice will be shown as follow on document in the shopping cart. It will show only the invoice number and it is only for the informational purpose. There is neither finance activity nor any reporting are made out that system.
Service provider just want to Park the document and not to post it, so it won't hit the GL account. This eliminates considerable work FI configuration settings.
Question is whether this unorthodox method of just parking, but not posting will cause any impact/risk, even though no FI activities is carried on that system.

It is not a normal practice and does not fulfill the intent of the park process but as long as you have controls around preventing those parked documents from being posted this should probably work.
Consider them to be a little akin to delivery accruals that are never matched to an invoice, my thoughts are you might want to HOLD rather than PARK these documents.
You will also need to consider what your long term housekeeping and archiving strategy will be for these essentially orphaned documents.

Line items seen in fbln but not in process open items

Hi Gurus,
one line item is seen in fbl3n but not in process open items in f-07,
the entry is rent a/c Dr
to rent payable a/c
we can see is fb03, fbl3n of both accounts
Pl suggest. I am unable to clear

Dear Shymalasandia,
You can reach REGUP by se11 and insert the document number that You can see by FBL1N but not during the payment.
Probably it is contained into a payment proposal (F110) and therefore You cannot pay it manually (to avoid double payment).
If You find it into REGUP table, You have two options:
1.pay it by F110
2. delete the payment proposal by F110 (menu> edit> proposal--> delete) and pay it manually.
I hope this helps.
Mauri

Excise Invoices Captured but not posted.

Hi,
How can I see the list of all excise invoices that are captured but not posted. Also list of excise invoices that are cancelled.
Regards
Ayyallas

Hi Ayyallas,
Have you tried transaction J2IUN and using the button "Display pending invoice".
You might also be able to see this in table J_1IEXCHDR with field STATUS.
Hope this helps,
Adam.

Sap treasury flow is due before accrual/deferral key date, but not posted

Hi,
I run TBB1 - posted business transactions - all transactions posted
when i run the tbb4 for product type 51a i got the following error
sap treasury flow is due before accrual/deferral key date, but not posted
Please see the image

Hello, Krishna.
You haven't posted flow types 1150.
Please go to your transaction, select "Cash flow" tab, Choose layout "106 Posting view", select flow type 1150 (one from your first screenshot above - use flow type and date) and check "Posting status" field - what's inside (please, provide screenshot)?
NA T2104
Short Text
Flow is due before accrual/deferral key date, but not posted
Diagnosis
The corresponding flow is due before the accrual/deferral key date, but has not yet been posted; this may result in the incorrect amount of expenses or revenues being displayed in financial accounting.
System Response
The flow is treated by the accrual/deferral function as if were already posted, i.e. the related expenses or revenues are accrued/deferred, where appropriate.
Procedure
Post the flow to correct the amounts of expenses or revenues shown in financial accounting.

Settled but not posted

Is there any T-code or standard report which can find the list of transaction which are settled, but not posted?
I tried TPM20, but only those were posted is listed

please check if you selected only relevant area (-s) for you, e.g. if you need a list of contracts settled but not posted, then mark 'issue no messages' in all non-relevant areas, like in a screenshot attached.
/Renatas

Task scheduler is showing success but not running job

Hello, I have a relatively simple .net application that I realized when ran through the Task Scheduler of a Windows 2008 R2 server it shows in the status that i completed successfully but apparently did not run at all from looking at the log file.
When I just manually execute this program it runs perfectly fine. I am using myself as the user to run this task and have full permissions.
I also tried a test batch file that just echos some text into a text file. Same issue.... shows that it runs ok in task scheduler but doesnt do anything while running it manually works fine.
Any ideas of what could be causing this? thanks

Hi Nehemiah,
I ran the test batch file as below and work without issue:
@echo This is a test> d:\test.txt
And this is my setting:
If there is anything else regarding this issue, please feel free to post back.
Best Regards,
Anna Wang
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

File Sender channel polling successfully but not picking the files.

Hi All,
Can any one please provide any SAP Note Or any Alert mechanism for the File Sender channel in case where the XI channel in polling successfully at a particular folder from Source System but not picking the files. Thanks in Advance for the solution.

Hello,
If you want to know the reason for failure in picking up the file ,You can check the MessagingSystem monitoring for the reason behind failure.
http://host:httpport/MessagingSystem/monitor/monitor.jsp
For Alert may be you can follow prateek instructions.
HTH
Rajesh

AFAR test run showing the values but not posting in Real run.

Hi Friends,
i have an issue with AFAR recalculating the depreclation. The details are as below;
1. Asset value date is 15.07.2010. but ordinary dep. start date was set as 01.01.2010 manually by the user.
2. The Period control method 11, the dep. is calculated for entire year for acquisition.
3. we have already calculated depreciation from period 12 2010 to period 04, 2011.
4. Now, we have changed ordinary depreciation start date for 5 asset records from 01.01.2010 to 15.07.2010.
5. Therefore, we recalculated AFAR for these assets for 2010 and test run is showing the values for these 5 asset. The same was expected by the business.
6. When we execute the real run, it is not posting and no change in asset explorer for period 12, 2010 or in current period. No error message is available in spool / job log.
We have opened FI periods as well.
My question is that why the system calculating the values in test run and if it is calculated in test run, why it is not posting in update run?
As per the period control method, the depreciation should not recalculated for half year even we change the ordinary dep,start date from 1st Jan to 15th July.
I request you to clarify my doubt and help me to understand the error which is stoping the values in update run of AFAR.
Best Regards,
Padmaja

Hi,
Sorry...it is not worked out. Alternatively, i tried the shift factor with variable depreciation and i achieved the values which appeared in AFAR test run.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
Padmaja
Edited by: PadmajaCH on May 19, 2011 3:26 PM

FF67 problem, can't change statement date(statement saved but not post)

I need to change the statement date of a bankstatement. I did not post the statement yet.
I used a wrong statement date, and I want to change it, but I saved it after booking the second screen(the one with the
statement items)
When I look by Manual Bank Statement Overview I see the bankstatement, but it has no Posting complete remark yet, because it has not been postefdofcourse.
The problem is I can't change the statement date, because when I try to Post then the systems gives an error because it does not accept the new statement date I want to use.
Is there a way to solve this problem? The statement has not been posted yet, so I suprised I can't change the statement date.
Anyway I hope somebody can help me out.

I had to post them first because otherwise it looks I could not delete the statement.
I saw no Id with only saving, that's why I post them. then the statement got an id.
What do I have to choose to make it possible to delete statements, not posted yet.
I guess I have to select something else because I did not see any Id to choose.
I do a manual input of the bankstatements (no import).
Whst's the best I can do now? What do you mean with FI?
I guess I can do a manual booking on the three(send/receive and general) bankaccounts to get the right position of the accounts?
The bankstatements are ok(booked with ff67) only the three accounts I mention above have the wrong position.

ORACLE 11G XE INSTALLED SUCCESSFULLY BUT NOT DISPLAYING IN BROWSER

WINDOWS 7, GOOGLE CHROME, ORACLE 11G XE IS INSTALLING SUCCESSFULLY BUT WHEN I START IT IN THE BROWSER IT IS NOT DISPLAYING IN THE BOTTOM IT IS SHOWING WAITING FOR 127.0.0.1.....
WHEN I GO TO RUN SQL COMMAND LINE AND WRITE CONNECT AND GIVE USER NAME AND PASSWORD IT IS SHOWING CONNECTED

Welcome to the forums - there is no need to SHOUT.
Pl identify the version of Windows 7, along with whether it is 32-bit or 64-bit. Do you meet all of the software requirements in the Install Guide ? http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17781_01/install.112/e18803/toc.htm
Have you completed all of the steps in the guide ? If so, did the steps complete without any errors ?
HTH
Srini

Max processes issue (but not a processes parameter issue)

I am having ora-0020 max processes issue, but my max processes is set to 550, and I have a highwater mark of 132 processes
select * from v$resource_limit
where resource_name = 'processes';
RESOURCE_NAME CURRENT_UTILIZATION MAX_UTILIZATION INITIAL_ALLOCATION LIMIT_VALUE
processes 52 132 550 550
This is a 2 node RAC cluster, and this only happens on one of the nodes. Anyone every see anything like this ?? It looks like some sort of leak with process handles or something.

This does seem quite strange. What version are you running?
ORA-0020 does seem to be a problem at the instance level, not the underlying O/S.
$oerr ora 20
00020, 00000, "maximum number of processes (%s) exceeded"
// *Cause: All process state objects are in use.
// *Action: Increase the value of the PROCESSES initialization parameter.If the problem was at the O/S level, I'd expect an ORA-12500, "TNS:listener failed to start a dedicated server process".
-Mark

Data Passed into CT_DATA and written back successfully but not reflecting in cube

Hi,
While executing through UJKT the log show data are written back successfully but those data's are not reflecting in cube. the sample log file is attached.
Kindly help me to resolve this issue
why new material with signdata 0 is not updating in cube
Regards
Vimal Raj

hi deepak ,
it should be , No 'Applicable Data found' , you can change your selection input values and try again ,
Or give appropriate selection for the query by knowing the data in the cube, use TCode LISTCUBE to view the contents and try ,
Let me know if the issue is some thing else
thanks,
sathy

Success but not Posted Process Scheduler

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for