System 9 on Solaris 10?

Ive seen some post where people have System 9.3 on Solaris 10? In the install guide I thought it said 10 was not supported? Is this true?

Great! Thanks. So according to the install guide it is only compatible with 32 bit - is this correct? Does anyone have it installed on a 64 bit?

Similar Messages

Udfs file system on Solaris 10

hello all,
cannot find the limit of udfs file system on solaris 10.
Which is the med a block size that can be used ?
ANy chance to create udfs on 8192 block size media ?
Thanks
Aldo

First check the mkfs_udfs((1M) manualpage, it displays some information regarding this. Next you may benefit from the fsdb_udfs(1M) command to display certain options. But with regards to blocksize and the likes the first manpage should do.

Does exist any top creating archives in a file system in solaris 10?

I need to know if exist any limit creating archives in a file system in solaris 10
thanks

http://www.unix.com/solaris/25956-max-size-file.html

Is there native file system for solaris cluster?

As GFS for RedHat Linux and GPFS for AIX, is there any native file system for solaris cluster? Thanks for any infomation!

What do you mean by 'native'?
Oracle Solaris Cluster has a feature called the Global File System (or sometimes the Proxy File System). It allows UFS or Symantec VxFS to be mounted globally (on all cluster nodes simultaneously) in read/write mode. There is also a shared QFS option. All these are described in the documentation and in the book "Oracle Solaris Cluster Essentials".
Tim
---

Migrating Interactive Unix system to Solaris 8

We are migrating a system developped using Interactive Unix 4.1 to Intel Solaris 8. Anyone has experienced that?
First difficulty is to read Interactive file system under Solaris, any tools for that?
Thanks!

If you'd like to send me private mail to [email protected] I may be able to offer some pointers.
Rgds
Chris

How to determine the file system on Solaris

Friends,
How to determine which file system I have installed UFS or ZFS on Solaris
Thanks

Other methods would include looking at the /etc/vfstab if it's in there or fstyp(1M):
System Administration Commands fstyp(1M)
NAME
fstyp - determine file system type
SYNOPSIS
fstyp [-a | -v] special [:logical-drive]

Latest round of patches on fabric booted system causes Solaris 10 to hang

I have a fairly stock install of Solaris 10 6/06 on a T2000 which uses a Emulex HBA to boot from Xiotech SAN attached disks.
I installed the following patches:
118712 14 < 16 R-- 24 SunOS 5.10: Sun XVR-100 Graphics Accelerator Patch
120050 05 < 06 RS- 28 SunOS 5.10: usermod patch
120222 16 < 17 R-- 19 SunOS 5.10: Emulex-Sun LightPulse Fibre Channel Adapter driver
120629 02 < 08 R-- 24 SunOS 5.10: libpool patch
120824 08 < 09 R-- 39 SunOS 5.10: SunBlade T6300 & Sun Fire (T1000, T2000) platform patc
121118 11 < 12 R-- 21 SunOS 5.10: Sun Update Connection System Client 1.0.9
122660 08 < 09 R-- 17 SunOS 5.10: zones patch
124258 03 < 05 RS- 19 SunOS 5.10: ufs and nfs driver patch
124327 -- < 04 R-- 34 SunOS 5.10: libpcp patch
120222 16 < 17 R-- 19 SunOS 5.10: Emulex-Sun LightPulse Fibre Channel Adapter driver
When I rebooted the system it will no longer boot up.
If I do a {ok} boot -m milestone=none and attempt to start all the services by hand, I see:
svc:/platform/sun4u/mpxio-upgrade:default (Multipath upgrade)
State: offline since June 4, 2007 4:05:58 PM CDT
Reason: Start method is running.
See: http://sun.com/msg/SMF-8000-C4
See: man -M /usr/share/man -s 1M stmsboot
See: /etc/svc/volatile/platform-sun4u-mpxio-upgrade:default.log
It appears the mpxio-upgrade script is failing to start.
If I run /lib/svc/method/mpxio-upgrade by hand the script hangs and can not be killed. Since I am on console the only want to recover is to send-brk and reboot. I truss'ed it and the last device it was trying to read is:
82: open("/devices/pseudo/devinfo@0:devinfo", O_RDONLY) = 5
82: ioctl(5, 0xDF82, 0x00000000) = 57311
This is the second time this has happened in the last 2 months. The first time the problem was resolved with a new kernel patch. However Sun could not tell me what the exact problem was.
Has anyone else run into SAN/Fabric booted servers failing to boot after various patches?

We have discovered the problem. It has nothing to do with SAN booting at all. It has to do with having a device plugged into the serial port. I was using this system to act as serial console for another device in the same rack. When the Sun kernel engineering asked me to unplug the serial cable and reboot I was skeptical, but it worked.
Sun has filed this as a bug. The only work around right now is to make sure you have nothing plugged into the serial port.

How do you expand a file system on Solaris 10 that is running as a LDOM on Solaris 11

I'm somewhat new to Solaris but needing to expand an existing file system /work on our solaris 10 ldom that was P2V'd into a Solaris 11.2 environment. I also have several additional questions that I can't seem to find an answer for anywhere.
When trying to expand the disk device using the "format" command, when you get to the partition and it asks you to "Enter partition size(147456b, 2c, 3891e, 72.00mb, 0.07g]:" what does the "b" "c" "e" sizes indicate and why and when would you use them? It seems that you would want to always just add size based on MB or GB?
When trying to use "growfs" after I increased a partition on a disk, I get error devinfo: /dev/dsk/c0d0s7: Inappropriate ioctl for device, growfs: cannot get partition size. What step have I missed?

Matt--
One suggestion: if you can't figure out how to put a file system on the empty space, you could clone your current partition to an external drive, re-partition the internal drive drive and then clone the external back. Like John, I've heard of utilities that can re-partition a drive without erasing your data, but I just can't imagine using one if I didn't have a clone anyway. So that's what I've done when I want to change a partition size.
charlie

Creating File System in SOLARIS

Hi Everyone,
We installed SOLARIS in SunFire server. There are 3 hard disks, namely, 0, 1 and 2. Default is zero. We formatted the disk 1 and 2 and now we're having problem creating a file system. Every time we log in to the server we automatically go to disk zero (0), which is the default. How can we create file system in disk 1 and 2?
We'll appreciate your answers. thank you.
Regards,
Eco

> We installed SOLARIS in SunFire server. There are 3 hard disks, namely, 0, 1 and 2. Default is zero. We formatted the disk 1 and 2 and now we're having problem creating a file system. Every time we log in to the server we automatically go to disk zero (0), which is the default. How can we create file system in disk 1 and 2?
newfs?
I'm not sure what you mean with "we automatically go to disk zero..".
> We'll appreciate your answers. thank you.
I suggest you take a Solaris class; no offense but if you have no clue how to administer your operating system running a SAP installation on top can be very tedious.
Markus
Edited by: Markus Doehr on Sep 16, 2009 11:16 AM

System panic- solaris 10

Hi
i have SPARC-Enterprise-T5220 machine- solaris 10.
in the past few days seems like the machine just reboots with kernel panic.
in this week 2 times all the zones were down and when i've execute the command uptime i saw the machine just startup again.
i've looked in the messages logs and it looks like this:
Apr 23 16:52:45 check o nfs: [ID 456612 kern.notice] file temporarily unavailable on the server, retrying...
Apr 23 16:53:24 check last message repeated 1 time
Apr 23 19:03:50 check unix: [ID 836849 kern.notice]
Apr 23 19:03:50 check ^Mpanic[cpu7]/thread=3005d5db980:
Apr 23 19:03:50 check unix: [ID 799565 kern.notice] BAD TRAP: type=9 rp=2a10ab36e00 addr=0 mmu_fsr=0
Apr 23 19:03:50 check unix: [ID 100000 kern.notice]
Apr 23 19:03:50 check unix: [ID 839527 kern.notice] tibemsd64:
Apr 23 19:03:50 check unix: [ID 520581 kern.notice] trap type = 0x9
Apr 23 19:03:50 check unix: [ID 101969 kern.notice] pid=11056, pc=0x0, sp=0x2a10ab366a1, tstate=0x80001605, context=0x36
Apr 23 19:03:50 check unix: [ID 743441 kern.notice] g1-g7: 4, 1123, 0, 300882a9140, 4, 1c, 3005d5db980
Apr 23 19:03:50 check unix: [ID 100000 kern.notice]
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 723222 kern.notice] 000002a10ab36b20 unix:die+9c (9, 2a10ab36e00, 0, 0, 2a10ab36be0, 4)
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 179002 kern.notice] %l0-3: 000000000121d05c 0000000000000009 0000000000000031 000000000121d05c
Apr 23 19:03:50 check %l4-7: 000000000121d060 000002a10ab36b98 0000000000000003 000000000108ec00
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 723222 kern.notice] 000002a10ab36c00 unix:trap+6c0 (2a10ab36e00, 10000, 0, 0, 30004022000, 3005d5db980)
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 179002 kern.notice] %l0-3: 0000000000000000 0000030089e742a0 0000000000000009 000003006bdd0590
Apr 23 19:03:50 check %l4-7: 0000000000000000 0000000000100000 0000000080001605 0000000000010200
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 723222 kern.notice] 000002a10ab36d50 unix:ktl0+64 (0, 2a7e538a904, 3, 4, 6001c08acc0, 2)
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 179002 kern.notice] %l0-3: 0000030004022000 0000000000000038 0000000080001605 000000000101ed44
Apr 23 19:03:50 check %l4-7: 00000000000b6950 00000000000b694f 0000000000000000 000002a10ab36e00
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 723222 kern.notice] 000002a10ab36ea0 genunix:uiomove+ec (2a7e538a904, 4, 1, 2a10ab37360, 30001b8b720, 4)
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 179002 kern.notice] %l0-3: 000002a10ab37370 000002a10ab373a0 0000000000000400 0000000000000002
Apr 23 19:03:50 check %l4-7: 0000000000000000 000002a10ab37390 00000300b692bac0 000002a750000000
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 723222 kern.notice] 000002a10ab36f50 nfs:writerp+134 (4, 4, 0, 1, 1822fd0, 108c7e0)
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 179002 kern.notice] %l0-3: 000000000108c7f0 000000000000fff7 0000000000000004 ffffffffffffe000
Apr 23 19:03:50 check %l4-7: 0000000000000000 000003009ed23d08 000002a10ab37370 0000000002690904
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 723222 kern.notice] 000002a10ab37030 nfs:nfs3_write+45c (300b692bac0, 2a10ab37360, 0, 4, 4, 2a7e538a000)
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 179002 kern.notice] %l0-3: 0000000000000904 0000000001822fd0 000002a10ab37370 0000000000000004
Apr 23 19:03:50 check %l4-7: 000003009ed23e50 000003009ed23d08 000006001d7e6440 000003009ed23c98
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 723222 kern.notice] 000002a10ab371f0 genunix:fop_write+20 (300b692bac0, 2a10ab37360, 0, 6001af0d1e8, 0, 7b71350c)
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 179002 kern.notice] %l0-3: 0000000000000004 0000000000002c08 0000000000002000 0000000000000001
Apr 23 19:03:50 check %l4-7: 000006000d612a80 00000300114b0a80 00000300114b0f68 00000000000aebb6
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 723222 kern.notice] 000002a10ab372a0 genunix:vn_rdwr+198 (1, 300b692bac0, 2a10ab3764c, 4, 2690904, 0)
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 179002 kern.notice] %l0-3: 0000000000000000 000006001af0d1e8 0000000000000000 0000000000000002
Apr 23 19:03:50 check %l4-7: 0000000000000001 000002a10ab37490 000006001af0d1e8 000002a10ab37490
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 723222 kern.notice] 000002a10ab373c0 genunix:core_write+4c (300b692bac0, 1, 2690904, 2a10ab3764c, 6001af0d1e8, 7ffffffffff
fffff)
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 179002 kern.notice] %l0-3: ffffffff7d000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 000002a10ab37490
Apr 23 19:03:50 check %l4-7: 000006001af0d1e8 0000000000000001 0000000001895e00 0000000000000004
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 723222 kern.notice] 000002a10ab374a0 elfexec:elfcore+88c (30010bf54b0, 30010bf5490, ffffffff80000000, 38, 2a10ab37620, 1)
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 179002 kern.notice] %l0-3: 0000000000000004 000002a10ab3764c 0000030010bf5498 00000000016248d0
Apr 23 19:03:50 check %l4-7: 0000000000000000 0000000000100000 0000000000001490 000000000000005e
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 723222 kern.notice] 000002a10ab376a0 genunix:do_core+23c (7bfb85e8, a, 59, 600183c50d8, 0, 0)
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 179002 kern.notice] %l0-3: 0000000000000ffb 0000030089e742a0 000006001af0d1e8 7fffffffffffffff
Apr 23 19:03:50 check %l4-7: 0000000001826ff8 0000030089e742a0 0000000000000064 0000000001826ff8
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 723222 kern.notice] 000002a10ab37760 genunix:core+244 (a, 0, 60018e21228, ffffbfff, 0, 30089e742a0)
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 179002 kern.notice] %l0-3: 0000000000000000 0000000000000400 0000060000adf3b0 0000000000000005
do you have any idea what can caused that problem?
the first thing i though is that this is hardware problem maybe in the cpu, but i think that if it was the machine was crashed and not just reboot herself.
it can cause by air condition problem?
maybe software issue?
what can i check for more info?
Thanks

It's likely time for you to use your service contract and open a support case with Sun.
Get the corefile properly analyzed.
The only things I notice in your excerpt were suggesting a possible corrupt spot on a file that is out on a NFS filesystem. Whatewver application you're running was unable to use it and in order to limit the amount of corruption, the system rebooted.
Grabbing some of those lines and editing for readability...
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 723222 kern.notice] 000002a10ab36f50 nfs:writerp
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 723222 kern.notice] 000002a10ab37030 nfs:nfs3_write
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 723222 kern.notice] 000002a10ab371f0
genunix:*fop_write*
Apr 23 19:03:50 check genunix: [ID 723222 kern.notice] 000002a10ab372a0
genunix:*vn_rdwr*
However I've never done core analysis for a living.

How to confirm changes to /etc/system on Solaris 9?

Hi: I added the following lines to the /etc/system and rebooted the machine.
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmnb=1073741824
set msgsys:msginfo_msgmax=65536
set msgsys:msginfo_msgtql=10000000
Anybody know a command on solaris 9 that will show these changes have taken into effect?
Thanks
Ravi

thanks.
ipcs -b does work
Hmm, can you see them with ipcs?
7/M.

Is there any way to login to a system running Solaris 10 if you do not have the login credentials?

I am trying to help a company that has inherited a Sunfire v245 running Solaris 10. It is connected to a RAID array that contains backup files for a branch that was closed. No one appears to have the name and password to login. Is there any way around this to reset without the original credentials? (Possibly at the command line?).

A Google search on keywords "solaris root password" presented the following Oracle document as the very first result link:
What To Do If You Forgot The Root Password
(There are more than 500,000 more results from that same Google search, if that link isn't sufficient.)

Implementing a proprietary file system for Solaris

Hi there,
I'm implementing at the moment a proprietary FS for several platforms including Solaris. Is there a good source of information about Solaris
flavor of Vnode/Vfs interface?
I do know about Erez Zadok's works in FS stacking, but his code examples
seem to be the only piece of information available publically. Am I right?
In particular, the Vnode method vop_realvp is of great interest for me. Since there is no such a thing neither in BSD, nor in Linux,
I'd appretiate it very much if somebody will give a tip about it's
purpose.
Hope to get a tip before the sources of Solaris 8 will be published...
Thank you in advance, sincerely,
Ilya

I'm implementing at the moment a proprietary FS for
several platforms including Solaris. Is there a good
source of information about Solaris
flavor of Vnode/Vfs interface?No there's none other then the source code itself, I'd
say you can't write filesystems for solaris without actually
having solaris source code access and even then it's
going to be a challenging task so you may up ending
looking for an existing filesystem that already solves
your problems.
frankB

System Copy (Solaris- Windows)

大家好！
公司现有一需求，要把一Solaris平台系统数据要导入到Win2003平台上，
因为我从来没有接触过，请教各位高手，有没有什么相关的经验和文档供参考一下。
先谢谢了。

http://www.diybl.com/course/7_databases/oracle/oraclejs/2008819/136406.html

Sendmail issue on Solaris 10 system...

I have two systems running Solaris 10 that are having sendmail issues. If mail messages like the one below gets bounced back or if someone replies to it, the message will go to [email protected], and that should not happen. I believe I configured these systems the same way as the others and they seem to be fine. I have reconfigured the sendmail on the problems systems and I am still seeing messages going to [email protected] Below is what our reports should be sending to us and below that is what we should not be sending. How do I fix this problem? Can someone help, please. Thanks.
CORRECT:
-----Original Message-----
From: root@nunode7 [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 0:04
To: [email protected]
Subject: Daily Security Report
Begin report of failed attempts to 'su' for nunode7 on Sun Dec 10 2006
No failed attempts to report
End report of failed attempts to 'su' for nunode7 on Sun Dec 10 2006
INCORRECT:
-----Original Message-----
From: root@nunode15 [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 0:01
To: [email protected]
Subject: Daily Security Report
Begin report of failed attempts to 'su' for nunode15 on Mon Dec 11 2006
No failed attempts to report
End report of failed attempts to 'su' for nunode15 on Mon Dec 11 2006
---------------------------------------------------------------------

So far it is happening for root. What do you suggest I do to fix it?
Below is an example of what I have been seeing. If you look at "To", you will see where the problem is..."relay" should not be there. The host name should not be there either as the masquerading configuration is set up. Something is causing "relay" to appear and I cant seem to find what it is.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 14:59
To: [email protected]
Subject: File Structures on node
Message was edited by:
DCMetroSunAdmin

Installing Oracle 9i on Solaris 10 SPARC, /etc/system vs. projects

Can anyone verify that the kernel tuning parameters that used to be set in /etc/system on Solaris 8 have any effect in Solaris 10? All the documentation I can find suggests that most (if not all) of these settings have been marked obsolete or removed in Solaris 10. It is my understanding that these settings (such as shared memory) need to be set by means of a project. If we are running with no project setup in Solaris 10 are we pretty much running "untuned" ? Thanks
Some links...
New or change parameters in Solaris 10
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-0404/appendixb-16?a=view
Solaris Tunable Parameters manual
http://dlc.sun.com/pdf/817-0404/817-0404.pdf

We have carried over the following parameters from /etc/system on our old Solaris 8 DB servers. We just want to know if these settings are having any effect. We are currently seeing some performance issues on T5220's with 32GB RAM (old DB servers were SunFire 4800's).
shmsys:shminfo_shmmax obsolete as of Solaris 10
shmsys:shminfo_shmseg removed in Solaris 10
shmsys:shminfo_shmmin removed in Solaris 10
shmsys:shminfo_shmmni obsolete as of Solaris 10
semsys:seminfo_semmns removed in Solaris 10
semsys:seminfo_semmni obsolete as of Solaris 10
semsys:seminfo_semmsl obsolete as of Solaris 10
semsys:seminfo_semopm obsolete as of Solaris 10
semsys:seminfo_semvmx removed in Solaris 10
rlim_fd_max=8096 In the Solaris 8 version, the default is 1024. In later Solaris releases, the default is 65,536
rlim_fd_cur=1024 Still supported
noexec_user_stack Still supported
Actual /etc/system settings...
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmax=31457280000
set shmsys:shminfo_shmseg=16
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmin=1
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmni=128
set semsys:seminfo_semmns=11000
set semsys:seminfo_semmni=0x402
set semsys:seminfo_semmsl=4096
set semsys:seminfo_semopm=100
set semsys:seminfo_semvmx=32767
set rlim_fd_max=8096
set rlim_fd_cur=1024
set noexec_user_stack=1
Edited by: [email protected] on Mar 6, 2009 12:25 PM

System 9 on Solaris 10?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for