Tags, Keywords - tagging and filtering/searching photos - an other `advanced search`

Hello,
I'd like to know, who of you would like new functionality on handling tags for filtering/searching photos (as a replacement of the `advanced search`)
(I noted it in German - sorry, I'm not used to write in English...)
The goal is, to use the same Tag-structure to tag photos and also to filter them (most likely as you could do that with PSE 9 ) .
I don't want this `advanced search` window, that takes a lot of space - I want to see my photos, not a hug program border... ;-) )
What's your opinion?
Regards
Thomas

Helllo Robert,
Thank you for your answer... ;-) - at least I'm not alone... ;-))
Well, if you only want to not to show up the `waste of space` - you can click on the ^ symbol most right in the top of the search area (next to the X symbol).
You can also put away tags from the filter by double klicking on them in the bar on the top of photos.
But you
- can not mix up AND/OR and NOT selections.
- can not enlarge the advanced search space to the whole screen - so, with many tags the selection of a specific tag is annoying
(since there are no optical differences like color and symbols as it does in the tags-tree)
How can we report that to adobe so they will enhance their product for us... ;-))
Regard
Thomas

Similar Messages

Not render any field search criteria initially in Advanced Search Panel

Hi Everyone!
It's possible to hide or remove all field search criterias initially in Advanced search panel. We need that initially doesn't exist any field search and the user use the 'Add another' option when him need add search criterias.
Thanks,
Carlos C.

Your solution to the indexing issue with the LIKE operator is taking a small issue and making a big issue out of it.
Why not just fix the initial problem with basic tuning techniques ... for example a hint would force index usage.
So might having accurate statistics. So might tuning one or more optimizer parameters a small amount.
You have chosen the wrong solution for a very small problem thus you are where you are.

Tags/keywords not recognized when importing photos

I am using Lightroom 1.3.1 and I am trying to set up a new catalog of all of my personal photos. I previously had used Adobe Photoshop Elements 5, then more recently Windows Live Photo Gallery to do all of my organization and tagging. Before making the jump to Lightroom, I wanted to get my photos organized before doing the initial import. So I organized them into folders by year/month/day. Then I imported them all in place into Lightroom. However, of about 4000 tagged photos Lightroom only imported the tags for about 1000 of them. If I take a photo with no keywords in Lightroom and look at it in Live Photo Gallery, with Microsoft's Photo Info tool, or using Photoshop's file info, I can see that tags. However, Lightroom doesn't show any keywords. With Photoshop file info I can see the keywords listed in the following places in the metadata: xap:Keywords, photoshop:keywords, MicrosoftPhoto:LastKeywordXMP, MicrosoftPhoto:LastKeywordIPTC, dc:subject. Looking at the metadata I can't see any difference between the photos that had their keywords imported and those that didn't. Where does Lightroom look for keywords? More importantly how can I get Lightroom to recognize the the keywords from all of these photos that I have already tagged? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks for the information. I am running Windows Vista. When I look at the image properties in explorer, I can see that 'tags' field and the tags are present as expected. Any metadata that was used Elements has been written to the files. I can see the tags in the files' metadata. I have already added the "Treat '/' as a keyword separator" in Lightroom. That is working fine for the keywords that it recognizes.
Previously my files just had the default names from the camera and they were put in folder according to the date I imported them from the camera. Before importing them into Lightroom I reorganized my photos by the date the pictures were taken. I used Downloader Pro to organize them in folder by Year->Month->yyyy-mm-dd using the capture date. The file names were also renamed by date and time like: 'yyyy-mm-dd hh'mm'ss.jpg'. All of my photos have the exact same folder/name structure. I can look into a single folder and some of images have their tags imported and others don't. The pictures were taken at the same time, with the same camera, and moved and processed together. In Vista's explorer the tags show up on on all of the photos, but in Lightroom only some of them will have tags. It is bazaar, in some folders all of the images get their tags imported, but in most folders, none of them get imported. Then in a few folders there will just be one or two of the images that have their tags imported.
Any other ideas about the problem, or ideas on how to troubleshoot would be greatly appreciated.

Search and find 'open' threads: request of advanced search features

Hello,
time is passing by quickly... Hence it happens that some threads I have started with a question / problem are still open, waiting for some further investigation etc.
However, after a few days the post has disappeared from the first forum page - and soon thereafter from my memory. All I remember is that there were a few open threads
So here is my question / suggestion for the forum: A feature to list all threads I have started but not marked as solved would be quite handy in such cases... Phrased differently, I'd like to have an advanced search capability where one can not only search for a given word, but also for certain metadata such as author, solved/unsolved, etc.
Thanks and have a nice day,
Wolfgang
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Wolfgang wrote:
Thanks, tst, but as you concur there is no chance to find the open, unsolved threads - only solved ones... I don't mind to first use regular search, but even the advanced options don't resolve my request...
Yes there is.
Attachments:
unsolved.PNG ‏5 KB

Simple Search (removing funtionality in advanced search)?

Hi,
i built a search in a custom BOL using the thmlb:advancedSearch. But i don't want the "advanced" features, like adding more search fields or using greater/lesser/beginns with etc..
Can someone tell me where to find a simpler search implementation or how to remove mentioned features?
Thanks in advance!
Best regards,
Alex

Hi Alex,
Check the 2nd level inheritance of search context node in your view. While creating advance search views 2nd level inheritance needs to be changed with appropriate advance search classes.
Like for BP : CL_BSP_WD_CONTEXT_NODE_ASP, BT ->CL_CRM_UIU_BT_ADVS_CN
Check if you have redefined the 2nd level inheritance...
Hope this helps..
Cheers,
Sumit Mittal

How Do I Sort a Group of Photos on the Same Page with the same Keyword Tag?

I want to group similar photos on the same page with the same keyword tag. I have tried dragging and dropping without any success. Can anyone help?

Create an album, then search using a keyword. Select all the photos produced by the search and drag them into the album.
You can drag photos into any order in Albums and they remain in your chosen order.

Make a keyword tag a child after it is created as an orphan tag

I created the keyword tag "butterflys" and applied it to some photos.
Later I created a keyword tag of "bees" and applied it to some other photos.
At this point I realized I should have a keyword of "insects".
I created the "insects" keyword but could not find a direct way to make "butterflys" and "bees" child tags of "insects.
I was able to do it by creating keywords of "BU" and "BE" as children of "insects"
Then I selected all the "bee" photos and added the keyword "BE" to them and similiarly selected "butterflys" and added the keyword "BU".
Then I deleted the keywords "butterflys" and "bees".
Finally, I renamed the keyword "BE" to "bees" and "BU" to "butterflys"
There must be a better way!
Lightroom 1.0 on Windows XP on a Compaq Computer.

There is a better way!
First, create the parent keyword, "Insects". Then, in the "Keyword Tags" pane, drag the child-to-be (no pun intended...) keyword (i.e. "Butterflys" or "Bees") and drop it on the parent-to-be keyword (i.e. "Insects").
hope that helps!

Lost the iphoto library and all the photos

I have recently installed some updates and upgraded to Yosemite 10.10.1. When I opened up Iphoto today there was no library and therefore no photos. I've searched the whole computer and can't find any jpegs so the library hasn't been moved.
I have been using the Time Machine with an external hard drive but today when I plugged in the drive to try to restore iphoto from my back up, the drive won't show, it's not recognised.
Has anybody got any ideas on what I can do to find my photos?

Restart your system and try again
This is not an iphoto issue - it is either a TM issue or an issue with you computer - maybe something here will help - https://www.apple.com/support/timemachine/ - or here - http://pondini.org/TM/FAQ.html
LN

Addiing fixed filters to Advanced Search

We have a set of libraries with custom columns in each. These are resulting from importing metadata from a legacy document management system. What I need to be able to do is to set up a way of searching each of these libraries and associated metadata in
isolation from each other.
I have created a page for each library using the advanced search web part and tried to customise it. I can add the metadata search fields sucessfully and use them to narrow down the search but the results page returns results from the whole subsite. I have
had limited sucess using an additional column for each library that has a unique name and I can use the drop down to search that but I would like to be able to force that in the search.
I can do it with the simple search (setting additional query terms) but then I don't get the option to add the restrictions for the other columns. I thought I could edit the keywordQuery field to add in something like
metaterm:"ABC"
This works if I add it to a result type that already specifies a document type but not for the generic "All Results". What have I missed.
The result type that works only works if I use the OR operator and not the AND operator, I would have expected the AND to give me what I want and the OR to give me lots more results.
Hope someone can help
Thanks

Hi,
Based on your description, you want to search from each library.
My suggestion is that you can create search scope for every library and use the scope in the Advanced search web part.
1. Create search scope for every library, and when you create, you should choose the advanced search, only you choose the advanced search, the search scope will display in the advanced search web part.
2. Edit the advanced search web part, choose the show the scope picker, you can see the search scope in the advanced search web part.
How to create a search scope:
http://www.bentedder.com/create-a-search-scope-for-a-sharepoint-2010-list-or-library/
Best regard,
Victoria
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

Deleting FB Posts and capturing FB photos.... question

Hopefully someone can help me with this... on the old version of FB on my Droid X, I used to be able to delete FB posts that are either on my profile, or that I have posted on other people's wall. I can't seem to do that anymore.
Also, I used to be able to long press pictures that my sister posted on her wall and save them to my SD card. I can't do that anymore either. Is this not an option anymore? Or is there a different way to do it now?
Any help would be appreciated, thanks!

were you just browsing to facebook website previously? Might be that you could still delete posts if you used your browser to go to the website directly.
Probably the same thing for long press , copy and paste ok photos.

Advanced search based on term set

I have a picture library where I use a term set to tag photos. The managed property is called owstaxIdCuisine.
When I perform a keyword search using one term from the term set (e.g. "vegetarian"), I would expect the pictures tagged with this term to be on top of the results. However it is not the case.
I have tried to include my managed property under "Add property restrictions" and enter the keyword there, but it doesn't seem to make any difference.
When I use refiners on the search results, it works fine: if I click the "vegetarian" checkbox, then I get only the vegetarian pictures. However I'd like my users to get the correct results directly from the advanced search form.
What am I missing?
Christophe Humbert Path to SharePoint http://blog.PathToSharePoint.com User Managed Solutions http://UserManagedSolutions.com

Hi Christophe,
Have you checked if you could add the custom managed property in the advanced search form per the following article?
http://waelmohamed.wordpress.com/2011/05/31/add-custom-search-properties-in-your-advanced-search-sharepoint-2010/
Thanks
Daniel Yang
TechNet Community Support

Customization in Advanced Search Area.

Hi All,
There is a requirement in advanced search area of return orders.
Based on the transaction type selected, corresponding status values has to be populated.
Here im populating the transactio type values in the drop down list box and status value i have to populate in the value help/ drop down/ F4 application, but these status values should be populated based on the transaction type we have selected.
We are working on CRM 5.0 version, and i have done few things,here im listing out the steps.
1) For the Transaction type field i have enable the Roundtrip CS search option.
2) I have created a new ABAP structure for the transaction field(ZCS_Trans_Search).
3) I have appened this abap structure to the calling F4 application (Status F4 appln)
4) implementing the IF_CRM_BSP_MODEL_ACCESS_IL_2FILL_F4_STRUCTURE and IF_CRM_BSP_MODEL_ACCESS_IL_2CHECK ACTIVE_SHUFFLER methods, but still im not able to enter in to this methods in the debug mode.
These steps i have done with the ref to PCUI COOK BOOK 5.0 version, here im copying the steps given in PCUI 5.0
5.1.3.7 Context sensitive value help
The current complex value help is not fully context sensitive. It does not consider the information
the user has already entered on the screen, If it is present in different screen position or in different
line of a list than the field on which F4 is pressed. Thus, the value help often displays result set
which are not related in the current context. To make value help context sensitive following points
must be improved.
The complex value help must consider the entries of relevant fields on the calling
applications screen as search criteria.
The value help application should be enabled to set the value in the Search-Shuffler
depending on the current context.
The application should be enabled to dynamically disable the availability of the value help
icon for a field.
To implement this feature for any field in the field group following steps to be performed:
1. New field group customizing flag is added the by checking this enables context sensitive
search for a input field. Field group customizing is called Roundtrip CS Search.
<Include the figure>
2. Determine the fields to be transferred to the value help application from calling application
and create ABAP structure from this fields.This structure is called Context sensitive
screenstructure (CS structure). Assign this CS structure to the complex value help
application which is associated with the input field. This is done in:
Transaction crmc_blueprint
Open the node Application/Layout node
Edit the value help application
Enter the name of the structure in the filed Struct. For Context-Sensitive srch. Help
(F4_CS_STRUCTURE)
3. PC-UI FW takes the CS structure data from the calling application and defaults them in the
value help applications advance search screen structure. Include this CS structure to the
advanced screen structure of value help application to have the same fields of CS structure
and add the corresponding fields for the CS structure to field group of advance search.
4. Implement IF_CRM_BSP_MODEL_ACCESS_IL_2~FILL_F4_STRUCTURE in the calling
applications Model Access Class. In this method you fill the value in CS structure which will
be passed to the value help application.
IF_CRM_BSP_MODEL_ACCESS_IL_2~FILL_F4_STRUCTURE
5. Implement / or enhance if already implemented
IF_CRM_BSP_MODEL_ACCESS_IL_2~CHECK_ACTIVE_SHUFFLER in value help
applications MAC. This step is optional, With this you will be able to select the correct
shuffler based on the context sensitive data passed with new import parameters values to
this method.
IF_CRM_BSP_MODEL_ACCESS_IL_2~ CHECK_ACTIVE_SHUFFLER.
Please do suggest me.. what are the things further i need to do..
REMEMBER: I have to do this implementation in the advance Search area.
Regards.
Anilkumar.

Hi,
As I understand, you would like to have more than 5 property filter in Advanced Search web part.
According to this article, it is one of the limitation in OOTB Advanced Search web part: "The property search doesn’t allow the users to specify more than 5 property filters." As workaround, "Reuse the OOTB Advanced Search UI’s hidden controls
that determines the search attributes (ASB_PS_…)". Please refer more information via:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/senthilkumarmani/archive/2010/06/05/custom-advanced-search-metadata-values-pre-populated-for-user-selection.aspx
Also, I find two articles about customizing the advanced search Webpart adding custom properties in case you need:
http://vuppalasanthosh.blogspot.com/2013/03/customizing-advanced-search-webpart.html
https://waelmohamed.wordpress.com/2011/05/31/add-custom-search-properties-in-your-advanced-search-sharepoint-2010/
Regards,
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

In Advanced Search Web Part , more than 5 properties filter cannot be added

In SharePoint 2013 Advanced Search Web Part, Under Add Property restrictions, Maximum number of search filter (AND / OR) is allowed is 5. How can I increase this count ?

Hi,
As I understand, you would like to have more than 5 property filter in Advanced Search web part.
According to this article, it is one of the limitation in OOTB Advanced Search web part: "The property search doesn’t allow the users to specify more than 5 property filters." As workaround, "Reuse the OOTB Advanced Search UI’s hidden controls
that determines the search attributes (ASB_PS_…)". Please refer more information via:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/senthilkumarmani/archive/2010/06/05/custom-advanced-search-metadata-values-pre-populated-for-user-selection.aspx
Also, I find two articles about customizing the advanced search Webpart adding custom properties in case you need:
http://vuppalasanthosh.blogspot.com/2013/03/customizing-advanced-search-webpart.html
https://waelmohamed.wordpress.com/2011/05/31/add-custom-search-properties-in-your-advanced-search-sharepoint-2010/
Regards,
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

Customize Advanced Search Options - Permission Set

I'm looking for a way to customize the Advanced Search Options on a per user (or permission set) basis, is there anyway to do that?
Idea here is we have multiple clients accessing our final cut server system and would like to customize their advanced searches to include only their metadata information and not other clients metadata information.

No, there is only one Asset Filter group. I'd like to see differentiation from the Subscription and Search Expired filters and the advanced search, and I placed a bug report to that end. You should do the same. Call it an "Enhancement".

Unable to create Table Bean advanced search criteria

Hi,
I want to create new search criteria for advanced search region. The reason being new search criteria i tried to add by personalization it didnt worked may be guessing construction mode is autocustomization mode. Somewhere i have seen if resultsbased it will work. Can someone confirm on this??
I'm trying to create new bean for search criteria at the specified location under <oa:table akRegionCode="EAM_AD_ASSET_RESULTS_TABLE" but unable to do so:
Here is the part of the page
<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>

<page xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/jrad" xmlns:ui="http://xmlns.oracle.com/uix/ui" xmlns:oa="http://xmlns.oracle.com/oa" xmlns:user="http://xmlns.oracle.com/jrad/user" file-version="$Header: EAM_AD_ADVSEARCH_PAGE.xml 120.18.12010000.3 2009/02/11 09:21:55 smrsharm ship $" version="10.1.3_1147" xml:lang="en-US" xmlns:jrad="http://xmlns.oracle.com/jrad">
<content>
<oa:pageLayout id="EAM_AD_ADVSEARCH_PAGE" akRegionCode="EAM_AD_ADVSEARCH_PAGE" regionName="Asset Search" amDefName="oracle.apps.eam.asset.server.AdvSearchAM" controllerClass="oracle.apps.eam.asset.webui.AdvSearchPageCO" appMenu="EAM_MAIN_SS" amStateRequired="false" helpTarget="EAM_AD_ADVSEARCH_PAGE">
<ui:corporateBranding>
<oa:image id="corporateBranding" source="/OA_MEDIA/FNDSSCORP.gif" shortDesc="Oracle"/>
</ui:corporateBranding>
<ui:productBranding>
<oa:image id="productBranding" source="/OA_MEDIA/EAMBRAND.gif" shortDesc="Asset Management"/>
</ui:productBranding>
<ui:contents>
<oa:query id="EamAssetQueryRegion" mode="autoCustomizationCriteria" dispSimple="true" dispCustomized="true" dispAdvanced="true" defaultPanel="customized" controllerClass="oracle.apps.eam.asset.webui.AdvSearchSearchCO" simpleSearchPanelButtonLabel="Simple Search" viewConfPanelButtonLabel="Views" advSearchPanelButtonLabel="Advanced Search" customizePanelTitle="Views" saveSearchButtonText="Save Search">
<oa:simpleSearchPanel>
<oa:defaultSingleColumn id="AssetSimpleSearchRegion" headerDisabled="false" text="Simple Search">
<ui:contents>
<oa:messageTextInput readOnly="false" columns="25" prompt="Asset Number" rows="1" secret="false" maximumLength="30" shortDesc="Asset Serial Number" id="EamAssetNumber" promptTranslationExpansion="100%" user:akAttributeCode="EAM_ASSET_NUMBER" user:akAttributeApplicationId="426" required="no" selectiveSearchCriteria="true"/>
<oa:messageLovInput externalListOfValues="/oracle/apps/eam/lov/webui/EAM_ASSET_CATEGORY_LOV" readOnly="false" columns="25" prompt="Category" rows="1" secret="false" id="EamAssetCategory" promptTranslationExpansion="100%" user:akAttributeCode="EAM_ASSET_CATEGORY" user:akAttributeApplicationId="426" selectiveSearchCriteria="true" shortDesc="Category">
<lovMappings>
<lovMap criteriaFrom="EamAssetCategory" lovItem="EamAssetCategory" id="lovMap1"/>
<lovMap resultTo="EamAssetCategory" lovItem="EamAssetCategory" id="lovMap2"/>
<lovMap id="lovMap39" lovItem="EamAssetCategoryId" resultTo="EamAssetCategoryId"/>
</lovMappings>
</oa:messageLovInput>
<oa:messageChoice readOnly="false" prompt="Asset Route" pickListViewDef="oracle.apps.eam.asset.server.PicklistYesNoVO" pickListDispAttr="Meaning" pickListValAttr="LookupCode" id="EamNetworkAsset" promptTranslationExpansion="100%" user:akAttributeCode="EAM_NETWORK_ASSET" user:akAttributeApplicationId="426" shortDesc="Asset Route" allowBlankValue="false" defaultValue="N"/>
<oa:formValue id="EamAssetCategoryId" dataType="NUMBER"/>
</ui:contents>
</oa:defaultSingleColumn>
</oa:simpleSearchPanel>
<oa:simpleSearchMappings>
<oa:queryCriteriaMap id="AssetNumberMapSS" criteriaItem="EamAssetNumber" resultsItem="AssetNumber1"/>
<oa:queryCriteriaMap id="AssetCategoryMapSS" criteriaItem="EamAssetCategory" resultsItem="AssetCategory1"/>
<oa:queryCriteriaMap id="AssetRouteMapSS" criteriaItem="EamNetworkAsset" resultsItem="AssetRoute"/>
<oa:queryCriteriaMap id="AssetCategoryIdMapSS" criteriaItem="EamAssetCategoryId" resultsItem="AssetCategoryId"/>
</oa:simpleSearchMappings>
<ui:contents>
<oa:tableLayout akRegionCode="EAM_AD_ADVSEARCH_RESULTS" regionName="Results" controllerClass="oracle.apps.eam.asset.webui.AssetResultsCO" addChildren="true" id="EamResultsNr" user:akAttributeCode="EAM_RESULTS_NR" user:akAttributeApplicationId="426">
<ui:contents>
<oa:tableLayout id="ResultsTableLayout2" width="100%" rendered="true">
<ui:contents>
<oa:rowLayout id="RowLayoutRegion2">
<ui:contents>
<oa:cellFormat id="CellFormatRegion2">
<ui:contents>
<oa:switcher id="MappedTableRegion">
<ui:case name="ShowTable" id="ShowTable">
<oa:table akRegionCode="EAM_AD_ASSET_RESULTS_TABLE" regionName="Asset Search" blockSize="25" standalone="true" height="1" id="MappedTable" user:akAttributeCode="EAM_RESULTS_NR" user:akAttributeApplicationId="426" width="100%" rendered="true" userCustomizable="true" shortDesc="Mapped Table">
<ui:contents>
<oa:messageStyledText id="AssetNumber1" viewName="AdvSearchVO" viewAttr="InstanceNumber" shortDesc="Serial Number" prompt="Asset Number"/>
<oa:messageStyledText id="AssetDescription1" viewName="AdvSearchVO" viewAttr="DescriptiveText" shortDesc="Asset Description" prompt="Asset Description"/>
<oa:messageStyledText id="AssetCategory1" viewName="AdvSearchVO" viewAttr="AssetCategory" shortDesc="Asset Category" prompt="Asset Category"/>
I tried several ways :
OAPageLayoutBean pageLayout = oapagecontext.getPageLayoutBean();
OAQueryBean query=(OAQueryBean)pageLayout.findChildRecursive("EamAssetQueryRegion");
OATableBean oawebbeantb = (OATableBean)query.findChildRecursive("EAM_AD_ASSET_RESULTS_TABLE");
OAMessageLovInputBean ccidbean = (OAMessageLovInputBean)oapagecontext.getWebBeanFactory().createWebBean(oapagecontext, OAWebBeanConstants.LOV_TEXT, null, "xxValidation");
if (oawebbeantb==null){
throw new OAException("Error this is a test!", OAException.ERROR);
oawebbeantb.addIndexedChild(ccidbean); --here it getting null
OR
OATableBean oawebbeantb = (OATableBean)oawebbean.findIndexedChildRecursive("EAM_AD_ASSET_RESULTS_TABLE");
OAMessageLovInputBean ccidbean = (OAMessageLovInputBean)oapagecontext.getWebBeanFactory().createWebBean(oapagecontext, OAWebBeanConstants.LOV_TEXT, null, "xxValidation");
oawebbeantb.addIndexedChild(ccidbean); --here it getting null
Please someone help me on this..
thanks,
mallik

1) Search panel textinput item should be search allowed true and prompt is need. no other property need to set.
HERE YOU DONT WANT TO SET VIEW INSTANCE AND ATTRIBUTE SINCE WE ARE DOING FOR EXTENDED VO ITEM AS SEARCH ITEM.THAT'S OK. I TRIED WITH YOUR COMMENTS FOR TEXTINPUT ITEM TOO.
Comment--
textinput item created is a simple item without any VO instance , etc.
There is no question of extended VO item, its a simple textinput item.
value in this field is going to compare with the values in result table.
2) Search mapping, only search item id and result item id need to set.
I'M DOING HERE MAPPING FOR ABOVE SEARCH ITEM ID AND RESULT ITEM ID
Comment-- Perfect !!
3) Item created in table , after you extended Vo, view instance and attribute needs to set.
WHERE DO YOU WANT THIS TO BE SET?? CAN YOU ELABORATE THIS MORE PLEASE.MAY BE I'M MISSING HERE SOMETHING.
Comment-- you must have created message styled text item in adv table bean, assign VO instance and attribute to it, right?
4) One more thing Parag, do i need to include where clause for extended VO item in view object??
for ex:
where attribute(this is extended vo item)=:4
Comment-- No need. this will be handled by point#2 above, i.e. criteria and result items.
--Parag Narkhede

Tags, Keywords - tagging and filtering/searching photos - an other `advanced search`

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for