Target Value check not taking place

Hey Gurus,
In the MIC i have maintained the target value as 8. Now i have created an inspection plan and assigned this MIC to it. The inspection lot is getting generated at the time of GR, I am going to QA32 and recording the result for the lot generated. But when i am giving a value of 6 for that particular MIC, it is accepting it and no rejection is taking place. Can anyone tell me why this is happening and is there any config missing?
Regards,
Abhishek

Hi
For the Rejection/Acceptance system will check the Specifications limits of the MIC not the target value. So maintain the Lower and Upper Specs for the MIC in QS23 and Chk in QA32. The values out of the Lower or Upper Specs will be the Rejections.
Regards
Brahmaji

Similar Messages

Income tax dedcution is not taking place on medical reimbursement .

Hi SAP-HR Experts .
I am facing a issue that for few employees Medical Exemption for incomeTax is not taking place for few employees ,
like upto Rs. 15000/- amount annually are exempted for Income Tax .
a employee whose exemption is taking place /3m1 wage type generated , while for those employees for which exempted for Income Tax in not taking place /3m1 is not generating .
IT-589 is maintained , and having amount 2MER(Medical reimbursement wage type) .
IT-267 is also having entry for Off-cycle Payment .
Emp X , having IT-589 , 2MER : 16,200 , for the duration of 01.04.2008 to 31.03.2009
for the month of May-2008 , He claims Rs. 1395.00 .
He has both wage types 2MER = 1395.00 and /3m1 = 1395.00 .
Employee X is correct case .
Emp Y : is wrong case where tax exemption is not taking place .
having IT-589 , 2MER : 30,600.00 , for the duration of 01.04.2008 to 31.03.2009
for the month of May-2008 , He claims Rs. 2086.00 .
He has both wage types 2MER = 2086.00 and /3m1 is not here .
what is required in ordfer to correct this wrong case (Employee - Y) .
Thanks & Regards : rajneesh

Hi Sikinder.
I have checked the Log of payroll both Correct case 'Emp-X' and wrong case 'Emp-Y'
Both emps are of same department and same location .
incase of Emp-X , Payroll-function INMED generates /3m1 wage type
while in case of EMP-Y it is not generating .
Why this is happening and how to correct it ?????.
Regards : rajneesh

Command link / button action is not taking place if i use it in iterator.

Hi,
I am new to ADF, i am facing 1 issue while implementing ADF mobile browser application.
Issue: command link / button action is not taking place if i use it in iterator. its just refreshing the page it self and displaying as no records.
Scenario is i am populating the search results in results page from search page using iterator, i want to get the complete details in different page (results page -> details page) .
I have tried in different ways.like
case1:
<tr:panelGroupLayout id="pgl2" layout="vertical" styleClass="af_m_panelBase">
<tr:panelHeader text="#{classviewBundle.SEARCH_RESULTS}" id="ph1"/>
<tr:iterator id="i1" value="#{bindings.SubjectVO1.collectionModel}" var="subject"
varStatus="subIndx" rows="100">
<tr:panelBox text="#{subject.Subject} #{subject.CatalogNbr} - #{subject.CourseTitleLong}"
styleClass="af_m_listingPrimaryDetails" id="pb1">
<f:facet name="toolbar"/>
<tr:table var="ssrClass" rowBandingInterval="1" id="t1" value="#{subject.children}"
varStatus="clsIndx" rowSelection="none"
binding="#{SessionBean.subjectTable}" verticalGridVisible="true"
emptyText="No Records" width="100%">
<tr:column id="c9" sortable="false" styleClass="width:100%">
<*tr:commandLink text="Section: #{ssrClass.ClassSection}-#{ssrClass.SsrComponentLovDescr} (#{ssrClass.ClassNbr})"*
id="commandLink2" styleClass="af_m_listingLink"
*action="#{pageFlowScope.BackingBean.searchaction}"></tr:commandLink>*
//remaining code
in this case commandlink action is not able to invoke serachaction() method
case 2:
<tr:commandLink text="Section: #{ssrClass.ClassSection}-#{ssrClass.SsrComponentLovDescr} (#{ssrClass.ClassNbr})"
id="commandLink2" styleClass="af_m_listingLink"
action="classdetails}"></tr:commandLink>
in this case its not able to navigate to classdetails page.
I gave correct navigation cases and rules in taskflow,but its working fine when the command link is out of iterator only.
i tried with actionlistener too.. but no use.. please help me out of this problem .
*Update to issue:*
The actual issue is when i use command link/button in an table/iterator whose parent tag is another iterator then the action is not taking place.
the structer of my code is
< iterator1>
#command link action1
< iterator2>
#command link action2
</ iterator2>
< /iterator1>
#command link action1 is working but "#command link action2" is not...
Thanks
Shyam
Edited by: shyam on Dec 26, 2011 5:40 PM

Hi,
To solve my problem I used a af:foreach instead.
<af:forEach items="#{viewScope.DataBySubjectServiceBean.toArray}" var="text">
<af:commandLink text="#{text.IndTextEn}" action="indicator-selected" id="cl1">
<af:setActionListener from="#{text.IndCode}" to="#{pageFlowScope.IndicatorCodeParam}" />
</af:commandLink>
</af:forEach>
By the way you need to convert the iterator to an Array using a ManagedBean.
public Object[] toArray() {
CollectionModel cm = (CollectionModel) getEL("#{bindings.TView1.collectionModel}");
indicators = new Object[cm.getRowCount()];
for(int i=0;i<cm.getRowCount();i++){
indicators[i] = cm.getRowData(i);
return indicators;
public static Object getEL(String expr) {
FacesContext fc = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
return fc.getApplication().evaluateExpressionGet(fc,expr,Object.class);
Hope that helps-
Edited by: JuJuZ on Jan 3, 2012 12:23 AM
Add getEL Method

Enhancement Section Activated but changes not taking place

Hello Friends,
I have been getting a dump error for FM GN_DELIVERY_CREATE_FOR_DIALOG which says that
"spe_version" does not exist in table "LIPS".
I found a enhancement option that commented out the perform that lead to the subroutine which has the error code.
I have activated business function LOG_LE_INTEGRATION via SFW5 which activates among others switch LE_SFWS_SC3.
I can see the global status of the switch as ON.
This switch is associated with enhancement spot ES_SAPLV50S which has implemented an enhancement section in inlcude LV50LF14 lines 191 -194
However, despite activation the changes are not taking place and i am still getting a dump error.
I am also not able to set a break-point in the FM because the program cannot be generated
My question is: Is successful program generation a pre-requiste for enhancement source plug-ins to be effective?
Any pointers would be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Minhaj.

Hi Minhajuddin ,
With "enhancement spot" we have come across similar short dumps and inactivation of spots even when steps are taken as per procedure.Please check if any notes are available for the same ,since most of the time it fixed the problem.
Regards
Byju

Goods release is not taking place

Dear Friends,
i am getting error while releasing goods from plan order to production order.
my case is as follows
while converting pl.order to production order, goods movement is not taking place.even though when we save the entries, production order is saved with the order number.then i go for goods receipt MB31,"goods is not released" message is displaying.
In the production order system is giving error message
Business transaction can not be carriedout.
system status WERC IS ACTIVE (ACT 600026850010)
Diagnosis :
Object Act 60002685 0010 has system status WCRE (work centre until release).According to this status transaction release opration is not allowed.
Procedure:
you can only carryout the requested function if this is allowed according to the status of object.
can anybody help on this.i think some configuration is required between plant and business area.
please guide me!

Hi Krish,
There is a problem with the tasklist type usage used in work center.
Check in Basic data of the work center "usage". You can see the defination of that in customizing transaction "OP45". In your case the tasklist type is set for "Until release" (check box), this means that this work centre will give error if used in order at the time of "Releasing" the order.
Resolution:
Use a proper task list usage in the work center or change the existing one by removing the check box activation for "Until release".
Regards,
Prasobh
Award your points if this was helpful...

Auto Goods Issue not taking place

Hii All
I hv Maintained backflush indictor in work center and in MRP2 view it is maintained as Workcenter
decides whether to backfluch .
But the auto goods issue is not taking place when the production order is saved and confirmed.
The stock remains the same ..
Can anybody tell the reason for that
Regds
Rakesh

Hi Rakesh,
what is the control key u have maintained in Routing?
if u r using Control key PP01 - Routing/Ref. op. set - internal proc., then after Production Order confirmation u have to do MB31- Goods Receipt for Order, with movement type 101.
If u r using PP03 Routing - in-house prod. auto. goods rct, then it accepts only single operation in a Routing (or) if u r having say more than one operations in a routing, then u have to give PP03 control key for the last operation.
I think u got it...
revert back if u have doubts.
Thanks & Regards,
Santosh

Delta upload not taking place properly

Hello Everyone,
I am trying to load data from R/3 to BW.
My data target is ODS.
For the first infopkg i m doing "initialize delta update".
Now i am making changes in particular field in R/3-say i am changing the name of the proj from ABC TO XYZ.
Now I m scheduling delta infopkg.But its not displaying the change. i hv even added new record in R/3 side and then tried wid delta infopkg but its still not taking the update.
I have defined Generic delta for my datasrc.delta specific field is "PROJID" and under settings i have checked "New status for changed records".
plz help.

Hi,
The SAP help on this DS recommends these steps
When you extract the documents for the first time, select the complete posting period.
SAP recommend that you carry out initialization and full upload in a number of steps in order to create smaller packages. To improve the performance, select an update via the PSA. The data is extracted in accordance with the selection criteria. In this case, the posting date of the documents is used as the selection criteria.
Initialize all future posting dates, even if the enhanced selection area does not yet contain any documents. The new documents are automatically entered by delta processing.
Carry out delta processing at regular intervals. We recommend that large utility companies carry out delta processing on a daily basis. Only documents with closed reconciliation keys can be processed.
Refer
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/87/c299397f3d11d5b3430050dadf08a4/frameset.htm
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
JituK

Disposition action not taking place

In URM, I have a trigger based on a Termination date field (custom meta data field) and when the document is being checked in and I am viewing the Life cycle; the correct disposition actions are being reflected in the details but when going to the records, approvals, pending disposition, the document is not coming.
I looked at the meta data field in the information fields and it is existing ; I looked at the advanced search design in the field info and the field exists and is tied to the correct caption.
The only thing I notice that in the life cycle, the computed date does not seem to have any value. Is it possible that the termination date is not able to get any value in the form (front end user interface).
How can I troubleshoot it further i.e where can I see that the value of termination date is actually being captured?
Could someone please give me some pointers - it would be much appreciated.
Thank you so much.

I'm sorry, but I'm not even sure what your latest response meant. So let me go about this in the way this should work.
You should have a trigger defined that uses the field "Termination Date" as the activation field. Let's call this trigger "Termination".
You should have a retention category whose disposition instruction set includes an action that says "After Termination, do something". Let's call this category HR, with a category id of "HR-100".
On the content item in question, there should be a category ID value of "HR-100", and a value in the field "Termination Date". Once the item is checked in, or an item is updated, clicking the "Lifecycle Preview" button should show a computed date. (You cannot fill out a new checkin form, and simply preview the lifecycle without actually submitting the form. In earlier versions you could.)
If you do not see a computed date after this, then you've got something in one of the three previous bullets wrong.

Dynamic availability check not taking reservation accumulation into account

We have 2 production orders for which the availability check had been done and situation is
Finished good has 1 component and the Plant stock of the component is 99 EA.No other receipts are in place.
Order1 is for quantity of 100 EA
Order2(at a later date than order1) is 1 EA
Post availaility check using COHV, Order1 is confirmed for 99 EA and is with MACM status and order2 has no commitment and is with MSPT status.
Dynamic availability check for CO27 in OMCP config points to the same checking rule we used during the intial material availabillity check.
In the Movement type config 261 movement type is assigned to dynamic avl.check - F Message in any case: E mess. for non-avail., otherw. S mess.
When we execute CO27 individually for the orders we can trap the error as per availability check commitments as we have seen earlier.
But when we try to input both orders together in CO27 and do a pick list confirmation the second order gets the component issue with the first one not getting posted (expected to be partially to the tune of 99 EA) thereby violating the availability check results ultimately.
Request your help in knowing whether this is the SAP design or am i missing some thing else?

Query posted in the PP Forum and hence this is closed.

Dynamic vailability check not taking Reservation accumulation into account

Hi,
We have 2 production orders for which the availability check has been done initially and the situation is
Finished good has 1 component and the Plant stock of the component is 99 EA.No other receipts are in place.
Order1 for FG is for quantity of 100 EA
Order2 for the FG (at a later date than order1) is 1 EA
Post availaility check using COHV, Order1 is confirmed for 99 EA and is with MACM status and order2 has no commitment and is with MSPT status.
Dynamic availability check for CO27 in OMCP config points to the same checking rule we used during the intial material availabillity check.
In the Movement type config 261 movement type is assigned to dynamic avl.check - F Message in any case: E mess. for non-avail., otherw. S mess.
When we execute CO27 individually for the orders we can trap the error as per availability check commitments as we have seen earlier.
But when we try to input both orders together in CO27 and do a pick list confirmation the second order gets the component issue with the first one not getting posted (expected to be partially to the tune of 99 EA) thereby violating the availability check results ultimately.
Request your help in knowing whether this is the SAP design or am i missing some thing else?
Regards,
SRK

Query posted in the PP Forum and hence this is closed.

Data extraction is not taking place from BW to R/3

Hi Experts,
We recently upgraded our BW 3.1 system to NW2004s/BI (BW 700). Now we are
not able to extract data from R/3 4.6C source system.
We checked and data extraction job is not getting triggered in R/3. It is
not receving Idoc.All the settings are correct in WE20 and WE21. I will appreciate your quick help.I am not sure if the question has been posted in correct forum or not as I am a newbee in SDN forum. If its not there in the correct forum,please let me know.
Many Thanks

hi Arun,
Thanks for your quick reply. and also I have made the mistakein the post subject . It is from R/3 to BW. But I checked all the ALE setings and RFC connection. Everyhthing is alright.but dont know why its not getting extracted. I think some problem might be lying with the function module. If you have any other idea apart from RFC/Delta please let me know. I am damn sure this isnot an issue with ALE config.
Just to make this issue little bit clear, the exact issue now I am facing is related to Idocs. Idocs are going to the state 56 in R/3 and all the control records are blank in R/3. This has created a nightmare. All the efforts are going in vain...
Many Thanks,
Chinmaya
Message was edited by:
Chinmaya Dash

Updated Latest End Time in workflow builder but change not taking place

Hello everyone,
In our existing leave application workflow (working fine for many years), we have set a deadline monitoring of Work Item Creation (WIS) + 10 days to send an email back to the applicant if his or her leave application wasn't acted upon by his/her supervisor.
Recently we have made some changes to the leave program and are required to test this deadline monitoring. In development environment instead of waiting for 10 days, we updated the Time field in the Latest End tab to 3 mins and then we generate and activate the workflow (through the Activation submenu in the Workflow menu).
Problem 1: But when the leave program generate the work item, inside the work item the Latest End date and time still show as WIS + 10 days, instead of WIS + 3 mins. We have already run SWU_OBUF and also refresh the organizational environment through SWUS but still to no avail.
Problem 2: When we change the Latest End date of the workitem to trigger the deadline monitoring, nothing happens even though the deadline monitoring batch job (SWWCOND & SWWDHEX) is already running successfully every 3 mins. In the executed action it just show 'Deadline reached' and the work item is in READY status.
In our work flow we have the process control to set the work item to obsolete. Really appreciate for any advice. Thanks.

Hi Rick,
Sorry, wrong choice of word. What i'm trying to say is as we don't have a workflow expert on our site, me and my colleague were a bit hesitant to manually change the work item deadline. But i see the benefit in doing that. At least now we know that changing the work item deadline would not affect the triggering of the deadline monitoring.
Hi Viji,
We haven't tied the changed workflow template to any transport request yet as we wanted to test it out in development environment first.
Sorry but how do i check if the outcome is active?
Hi Rob,
We didn't do any import. Since we're testing the changes in dev, we're directly changing the workflow template and activating it without tagging it to any transport request. But thanks for letting us know about table HRS1205, will give it a look tomorrow afternoon.
And also we're generating new work item for our testing. That's why we were surprise the new work item is still not picking up the WIS+3 mins latest end date.

Intial stock uploading not taking place. after initial price uploading

Dear Pandits,
I am process of uploading initital stock uploading.
1.   Initital prices have been maintained thro MR21 as on 31.3.2009.( 12/2008)
2.   MM period has been opened for April 2009 ( 1/2009)
3.   When uploading the stock system giving error msg. "Price for Material 0000000004 in Plant 1000
      for Not found"
Please advise what could have gone wrong.
thanks
v balajee

Consumable materials are not having accounting view in normal practice, but if you are uploading through LSMw, tick of accounting view remove it, and if you are using the accounting view then add the value field in your LSMW and add the value columun and then upload because its moving average price its not the standard price.
regards,
qsm sap

Material PO confirmation at supplier side (SUS) not taking place in SRM SUS Extended classic scenario

We have configured extended classic scenario SRM with SUS, and all functions are working fine. However, at the time of PO confirmation of material item at the Supplier side (SUS), the material line item disappears when we click on the Create Confirmation button in SUS. The functionality is working fine for Service Items. The total value of PO is also displayed correctly in the Items overview section.
Please provide some help in solving this issue.

Hello,
This is the correct behaviour of SUS - confirmations can only be created for service items which in turn create service entry sheets (Trx: ML81N in ECC). And accepting the SES in ML81N will generate GR posting.
For material items, you have to create ASN which will in turn create inbound delivery in ECC which you can post and will generate goods movement documents.
So basically, for service items you create confirmation and for materials you create ASN.
Regards,
Prasanna

Unicode conversion progress - Language conversion not taking place

Hi all,
I have an issue regarding database translation in standard and customised programs. when i log on in chinese and execute sap standard reports eg form pp tcode is cs11 ( exclude basis reports ) i found that the descriptions were missing and the unit column appears as asterix(). Regarding my Z programms the description appears in english and the unit column appears as asterix().
Regarding the case of basis reports it displays chinese characters. Regarding the description, displays blank and UOM asterix(*)
I have the document for transaction se63. If any guidelines regarding sapscripts conversion would really helpful.
The procedure i am following is check for extended errors ( SLIN ) and for code inspector. Is there any thing else i am supposed to take care. please advice me regarding the gameplan to attack.
Regarding Translation, i found SE63 of much use. I understand from the documentation is that every translation ends with generation of xml. regarding the export how to do and mass translation of short, long and other texts otr text how to do?
There is another one more simple question. In abap source code, in case stmts i found exit statements after the message of stop type. the code inspector throws error message as unreachable code. how to handle this shall i can remove exit.
The hard coded strings how to handle? for example in case statement based on selection the constant string eg "one" is assigned to one variable. now in code inspector check it clearly throws an error check that the hardcoded variables cannot be translated what should i do?

Hi Shweta !
I'm facing same issue as you posted here.
Any feedback ? Have you been able to solve it ??
Regards,
SJR

Target Value check not taking place

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for