TAS items- VA05

Hi Guru's!
My dilema is this- We have sales orders that were created for TAS items- which have already been delivered by 3rd party, fully invoiced, and cleared.- well this orders are still showing up in VA05- which they shouldn't be.- since delivery has been done, and invoiced.
I checked the sales doc's incomplete log- doc's show as complete, but when i checked the document flow Orders are showing as- Being Processed?
Does anyone have any idea why they would still be showing up in VA05? and what's a solution for this?
Any user Exit idea's to set the status of this line items to complete when the full quantity has been billed?

hi
step1 create third party order
VA01
step2; create purchase order
ME21N
step3: post Goods receipt
MIGO
step4; Invoice verification
MIRO
step5: create invoice
VF01
then goto VA05 see the results
regards
krishna

Similar Messages

Diff between TAN and TAS item category

hi
wht is the diffrence between TAN and TAS item category and how to configure during implementation stage.
Thnaks

Hello,
Main difference between TAN and TAS is, TAN is relevent for delivey and TAS is not relevent for delivery.
TAN is used in normal business process and TAS is used in third party process.
In the item category determination it will be like
OR -- NORM--> TAN --> TAS
OR --> BANS --> TAS.
Prase

Returns of Direct Ship (TAS) Items

Hi Experts,
How are returns of Direct Ship(3rd Party) TAS items handled in SAP. What is the standard process ?
1. If items are returned to Vendor, how is it all mapped ?
2. If items are returned to us, how will we take them and return it back to vendor ?
Thanks !!

Hi,
Refer the SAP notes 751609 - Returns for third-party process (cancellation).
Per SAP this functionality is missing. If reversal has to happen, then it should be carried out in Sales and purchasing seperately.
Following are the details of this note;
Summary
Symptom
There are several documents for a third-party process or individual purchase order process that is, a purchase order was created for a sales order (via a purchase requisition) and in addition, goods and/or invoice receipts may exist for this.
You cannot cancel this process by creating a cancellation third-party order or a cancellation individual purchase order with reference to the original sales order.
You also cannot set up a return process that links customer and vendor return documents (for example: returns order and corresponding credit memos) with each other.
Other terms
Sales order, purchase requisition, PReq, individual purchase order, individual purchase order item, TAB, third-party order, third-party order item, TAS, SD order, cancellation, cancellations, returns
Reason and Prerequisites
This function is missing. The above scenario is not designed in the SAP Standard System.
Solution
The documents in question must be undone individually by cancellation postings or returns must be created and posted separately on purchase order and sales order side.
An enhancement of the functions is not planned at the moment in the SAP Standard System. If you want to create a development request, consider Note 11.
Regards,

Deliery block sales orders report for TAS items

Hi,
User requirement is need a report which gives list of sales orders which have the delivery block in sales order schedule lines.( of third party items TAS)
I found V.14 and VA14L to find out the sales orders which give the list of sales orders which are blocked for outbound delivery (in schedule line delivery block).
However, for third party items sales order with item category TAS are not coming in the report of V.14.
I think the reason is because of the third party items are not relevant for delivery hence v.14 report not fetching the data of third party orders(TAS), is this my understanding is correct?
If the user is insisting on for even third party items also they want a report which should give the list of sales order which are blocked for delivery block then what is the best way to advise the user?
And does it make any sense putting delivery block for third party items ? because we are not delivering the goods to customer and even if you put delivery block we can’t stop PR,PO and MIGO and MIRO etc .
Thanks,

is this my understanding is correct?
Absolutely correct.
they want a report which should give the list of sales order which are blocked for delivery block
Since the inventory / stock of material would be handled out of SAP, what is the need to set a delivery block. Even if you set delivery block, vendor is going to deliver the material.
what is the best way to advise the user?
Convince the user what they are expecting in SAP are logically incorrect. When the material is being delivered by a vendor, what is the use if you set delivery block for this item? What they are going to achieve.
And does it make any sense putting delivery block for third party items ?
Definitely, no
G. Lakshmipathi

Single inovice for TAN and TAS ITEMS ?

HOW TO SETUP SINGLE INVOICE FOR THE SALES ORDER WITH LINE ITEMS TAN AND TAS.? PLZ HELP WITH SEETINGS AND PROCEDURE.
REGARDS,

Hi
Copy Item Category TAS to ZTAS and for ZTAS Item Category,do the following changes delivery relevant billing,Also maintain
Copy controls.
Also make sure that in the sales order split invoice should not take place because of the billing split parameters.It is recommended not to go with the same sales order as it is related to third party sales process
Regards
Srinath

GR process for TAS item category

The issue is:
We have issued lot of PO as drop shipment kind of scenario. ie. not relevant for GR. There are many sales order open PR lying with schedule line which is not valid for GR.
We want to do the GR process for them. when i try to do a GR it says "purchase order has no items." I need to convert all these as sales order stock.
Can someone guide me, how this can be achieved?
Thanks

Yes it is possible. In the IM/WM interface tables, in the second table, you can vary the process according to stock status. See the third column.
LogisticsExecution \ Warehouse Management \ Interfaces \ Inventory Management \ Define Movement Type
Following is the config. help text for the field
Special Stock Indicators for Whse Mgmt
Use
In the Materials Management system you can post different transactions using one movement type. For example, posting goods receipt to unallocated stock or goods receipt to
stock in quality inspection.
These transactions are treated differently by the system on the basis of this indicator. Together with other indicators of a movement type in the Materials Management system, this indicator is used to correctly allocate a movement type in the Warehouse Management system so that the transaction can be posted accordingly.
Regards,
Nick

Item category TAS

Hello Gurus,
Item category TAS is used for Third-Party Processing, but The indicator for the automatic creation of purchase orders has not been set for item category TAS. how can we this item category for Third-Party Processing ?
Many Thanks!

Hi
The control in TAS Item category is for automatic creation of Purchase Order only(after automatic creation of PR) and not for creating Purchase Requisition. The PR is crated automatically based on the settings in Schedule lines.
Please go thro the F1 help for the field Automatic PO creation in TAS....
Create purchase order automatically:
If you activate this field, the system automatically generates both a purchase order requisition for third-party schedule lines as well as a purchase order in the background when you save the sales order. This function has been designed for Application Link Enabling (ALE) but you can also use it when working with distributed systems.
Thanks,
Ravi

Third Party Item Category TAS

Can anyone advise the follolwing?
For TAS item category under copy control OR -> F2, i changed the the billing qty from 'F' to 'E' such that i can allow SD billing to take place once GR is done for the back to back PO. However, i am still not able to generate billing until i complete the IV for the PO. Is there other thing i missed out?
Thanks
Peter

Hi
You have mentioned about the third party process and also mentioning about intercompany invoice. Considering that you are asking about the third party process I'm giving the below reply..
This is controlled by the Billing Relevance field in the item category. Here if we specify F - then the system checks for the vendor invoice quantity(MIRO). If you select the value B - then the system will allow you to do invoice without checking for the vendor invoicing.
Thanks,
Ravi

Third Party Orders not appearing in billing due list. Item Cat billing rel 'F' & VTFA Billing Qty E

I had a requirement to do my customer billing for third party scenario before doing the invoice verification.
The solution that was proposed was to make the following changes,
In VOV7 (For TAS )item category the billing relevance should be (G) and
in the copy control VTFA at item level for item cat (TAS)maintain the billing qty(E).
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3522580
The problem I faced with the above config change was that nothing was appearing in the billing due list and when I tried to do a billing from the order directly, it would not let me.
Then I made the following change,
In VOV7 (For TAS )item category the billing relevance as (F) and
in the copy control VTFA at item level for item cat (TAS)maintained the billing qty(E).
Now after the MIGO is done based on the PO, the system allows me to do a customer billing from the SO before the invoice verification. But still this SO is still not appearing in the billing due list. Have any of you experts faced the same problem? How can I get this to appear in the billing due list? Or in other words, how do I identify open third party sales orders that are due for billing?
Thanks and regards
ES

@ Joan, in that case invoice verification would now be necessary anymore right? In my case i need the invoice verification to happen...but at a later stage
With the existing config...i.e. F as billing relevance and E as billing quantity, I now tried doing a MIRO immediately after the MIGO and then it appears in the billing due list. So basically I think its the billing relevance F...and if I want it to come in VFO4 before MIRO, perhaps a tweak in the logic of VFO4 to include billing relevance F + billing quantity E ?

Auto PO - Free Item

When we are creating SO, an auto PO is being triggered. However, the free item in SO is not being copied to PO. Instead it is being saved as a regular item.
Any idea how to fix this?
Thanks.

Hi,
As per my knowledge this can be controlled through item category,for automatic PR can be created through TAS item category with schedule line CS,so if the order have two line items like normal good and free good we can make difference through the item category,the PR will generate only for TAS item category for TANN it won't generate.
Thanks
Ram

Rescheduling for the third party items

Dear Experts,
I have one issue. In the sales order there are TAN and TAS items. TAN items are delivered and done with PGI. For TAS items PO created and then MIRO also done. Now some new items are added in the sales order.
Why is it that the system reschedules the dates (Delivery date, loading date as well as Material availability date) for TAS items but at the same time it does not reschedules the TAN items. Strange but true..
I would like to add here one more point. When there is a complete delivery indicator system considers the delivery date of the TAS item as the highest delivery date and reschedules the dates for rest of the items. Actually TAS items should not be considered at all since the MIRO is processed and the delivery to the customer has taken place.
Is this a standard process..? Kindly help on this issue. if anyone has any idea on SAP note please do let me know.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Vishita..
Edited by: Vishi19 on May 18, 2010 12:44 PM

Hello
There are no other supported interfaces or tools other than LOGMINER to mine and interpret the oracle redo/archived logs. Oracle has the rights to change the redo format or make any changes in the redo stream or change vectors as part of any patchsets or new releases. Any third party software might face problems if Oracle changes its redo format or makes changes in the redo format.
You might need to take a look at the following metalink note:
<Note: 97080.1> "Extracting Data from Redo Logs Is Not A Supported Interface"
However Oracle has a replication technology called Oracle Streams which infact mines the redo/archived logs with the help of a new background process called 'capture process' which does not use any APIs but is built into to Oracle Kernel itself. Oracle Enterprise Edition will have this feature built-in.
Thanks,
Rijesh

Different Item Category and single invoice.

Hi Experts,
A customer has 2 materials one is third party mat(TAS),Second one is normal mat(TAN)..These both items entered in one sales order and his requirement is he wanted in single invoice with out splitting? How can we do this?
Is it possible then how.of not then why not?
Regards
Rohit

Rohit,
Very Interesting scenario, it can be made possible.
But first let me tell you both the process, to convince my solution.
a. TAS item category is used in third party scenario. wherein delivery will happen from third party vendor. Invoicing will be addressed to us by the vendor using which we will invoice the customer.
This is order relavent Billing process.
b. TAN item category is used in standard process wherein delivery and invoicing takes place. This is delivery relvant billing process
Both are totally different, but if you insist you please contact your ABAPER to get a customised invoice.
Regards
Sathya

Service item

Hi Gurus,
We are having intersting scenario.
We we need to create order which conists of three line items.
1. Company material
2. material from a third party vendor.
3. service item from a third party vendor(who does the assembly of 1 and 2 line item).
So we need to have all the three line items in one order where in line item 2 and 3 has to create PR and then PO.
Please tell me is it possible make the service item as a third party item such that it should create PR and PO.
Note that iam trying the same by copying TAS item category but while creating order for the service item it is throwing error message "No account determined for consumtpion account).
Please give me some suggestion.
Regards,
Babs

Dear Friend,
Have you assigned the account determination keys for the Service item.
If you have maintained the service item then go to AC02.
There in the basic data define : Material Group
Division:
Valuation class.
Now go to OBYC :
select your chart of accounts :
And check your consumption acoounts with the valustion class.
Hope your problem will get resolved.
If not then revert.
also if you have problem then go to t-code OMWB AND stimulate by entering your material and the movement type you ahve specified in the schedule line level of the service item.
Edited by: Associate Consultant on Sep 22, 2008 2:19 PM

Delivery-related billing for TAS : take VPRS value from GR or Invoice

Hello,
One my customers currently invoices stock items and Third-Party Items separately. He now wishes to invoice both items together.
In Third-Party standard flow no delivery is needed. In order to invoice both items together I have now activated the delivery for the Third-Party item flow (item category TAS).
I can now invoice both items together based on the common delivery.
I have now another problem regarding the TAS item invoiced...
- In standard flow (third-party processing = order-related billing), the value for VPRS is taken from the MM flow (either from Goods Receipt or from vendor's invoice depending on the customizing) automatically. This is great since the vendor might enter a different cost than the one from the sales order and it is that cost that we need to find in the billing doc and in CO-PA.
- When I do delivery-related billing for my TAS item the VPRS is not updated from MM but is taken from Sales order (thus from material cost) --> incorrect value for my customers's need
I need to do delivery-related billing for item TAS with VPRS in billing doc (SD invoice) = value of MIGO or MIRO
Can anyone indicate me how to do this (user-exit? routine? ....)
Thank you
Regards,
Cynthia

Hi Cynthia,
Anyone, please correct me if i am wrong.
can we do like this for the given situation:
instead of changing TAS functionality, let us have billing relevance G (Order-related billing of the delivery quantity) in the item category for the stock items. so that you can bill both stock item and third party item in one billing document with reference to Order instead of delivery document.
you can have separate Item category for changing in SO for stock item whenever you want to club Third party item and Stock item for billing in the same document.
thanks
Rajam

Third party sd order (TAS) intrastat relevant in SD invoicing?

Hi,
In the scenario of a third party order (TAS item category) is it required to use the SD invoice for intrastat?
I think not, because the PO is purchasing intrastat relevant and the vendor should report his invoice as intrastat relevant. But in standard SAP the TAS is intrastat relevant, so maybe I made a mistake?
Best regards,
Eric van Zundert

Hi,
I cannot follow your remark.
An example of the situation:
Company A in country A invoices customber B in country B.
The delivery comes from country C by vendor C.
All countries are situated within de EC
The question is: is the invoice from Company A to customer B intrastat relevant?
In other words: is item category TAS in SAP intrastat relavant during billing the end customer?
Thank you,
Eric.
Edited by: Eric Van Zundert on Nov 19, 2008 6:48 AM

TAS items- VA05

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for