Tax flow from SABRIX to Invoice

Hi Gurus,
Need your help/ comments on the following scenario:
Billing document has only one line item and the accounting document can't be generated since the system gives an error message stating "Pricing error in item 000010" message number if VF073.
Now the background for this is:
Taxes in the sales order are flowing from SABRIX, the condition records show 2 levels of taxes 4% & 1% subsequently but the condition value is 0, which means taxes are not relevant for this scenario even when the taxes are flowing in, now the sales order has 4% & 1% but the invoice does not have 4% & 1% and this is the reason why this document has a pricing error.
Now the question is what are the possible scenarios where tax condition records are not flowing from sales order to invoice, I have made sure that SABRIX was not down anytime during the day.
Please help
regards
Anmol

this is the reason why this document has a pricing error.
To me it looks an early conclusion without much analysis. System won't check whether tax is applicable or not when releasing to accounting, unless the tax condition types are checked as mandatory. What you need to do is try to simulate the scenario in the test system (copying the pricing date from the production system sales order) and do the pricing analysis. Then you will realize the reason for the pricing error. Some possibilities could be Tax laws are keep on changing (resulting SABRIX updates), user might have changed the master data (customer master tax condition), user exit might be causing calculation of taxes,any routines in the pricing procedure etc.
Regards,

Similar Messages

Requirement for getting the VAT Taxes automatically from the vendor invoice

Dear All,
We Have a Requirement for getting the VAT Taxes automatically from the vendor invoice in to the Sales invoice after invoice verification process.Is this feasible?. Can anybody explain how this can be done to overcome this issue.
Thanking you,
Best regards,
R.Srinivasan

hi,
technically i do not think tht can be done. but even from functional part its incorrect in the sense tht the values on which tax is calculated in purchase may be very different from tht in sales. so we may never get the correct picture.
saurabh

Handle Reverse charges tax lines from Sabrix for creation of new Invoice document.

Hi Gurus,
I am facing an issue in case where Sabrix is returning Reverse Charge Lines as show below:
Tax Rate
Tax Amount
Tax Base
-0.24
-240
1000
0.24
240
1000
The original invoice Line item was as follows:
Net Amount : 1000.00
Tax Amount : 0.00
PO Number at line level.
Tax code : I1
Now, I am using BAPI : BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE to create an invoice document for non reverse charge scenarios. I am filling table : GLACCOUNTDATA with other details such as GL account, tax code, amount, etc from Invoice related document and PO.
But I have no idea where should I push these reverse charge lines.
Please help me from technical perspective on how to assimilate these reverse charge lines.
Thanks and Regards,
Saurabh.

HELLO STAR SHANKAR SIR,
Oh gr8. first time seeing this type of question.....
u r really...................
with regards
Suvetha
Gayathri

Tax Calculation from tax code

Hi,
I need to calculate individual taxes like excise, CST,VAT etc. after fetching tax Code from Table RSEG(Invoicing Table). Can anyone please tell me the logic or code to do so?
Yuvnish

Hi Yuvnish,
Can you try like this ...
Maybe this will help you...
USe FM CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM'
Moderator message - Please respect the 2,500 character maximum when posting. Post only the relevant portions of code
In that, you get the condtion type. You can use document number, position number, posting date if u want.
Hope it will resolve ur problem.
Thanks & Regards,
Anagha Deshmukh
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Dec 2, 2009 10:08 AM

Excise Values are not flowing from J1IJ to VF01

Hi All,
I am facing the problem in Invoice to Customer(from Depot). Excise Values are not flowing from J1IJ. I maintained Alt Cal type as 356 in Pricing procedure for Excise condition types. Even though its not flowing. I am using Tax Procedure TAXINN.
I have gone through SDN, everybody is suggesting about 356 routine.
My scenario is STO from Plant to Depot and Sale from Depot to Customer.
ME21N->VL10B->VF01(Proforma)->J1IIN->MIGO->VA01(from Depot)->VL01N->J1IJ(Depot Excise)->VF01(Invoice to Customer)
In J1IJ, excise values are coming but in VF01 it is not coming.
Kindly help me.
With Regards
Azeez.Mohd

Hi,
in j1ig initial screen which excise group/series group i need to enter
is it of supplying plant or depot --- Enter Your Excise group
If i enter material document no say 5000000265 (corresponds to migo-101 at depot )& year
it'm getting error message excise invoice already exists for5000000265 --> Check the Year of material document
You can also use the Excise Invoice Details tab
Enter Vendor's Ex.Inv.No. , enter your STO's Excise Invoice No. and Click on Own factory and enter factory's Series Group in n case of STO from factory,
use Depot Excise Invoice in case of transfer from another depot
and Excise Inv. Date
On next screen,
In case of non availability of Internal Excise No., select the line item and click on button. On next screen, enter Excise Inv. No., Date, Challan Qty, Excise Base value, ensure that Excise Duty rates are maintained in respective duty rates column, you can also manually enter the excise duty amount and press Enter . System will give warning messages, press Enter for each message and press Back button. System will display the excise duty amount, check the same and click on Save button.
Hope this will resolve your issue.
Regards,
Krishna O

Changed JAOQ values not flowing from J1IEX to MIRO

Dear CIN experts,
We are having Dealers excise invoice capturing scenario in our implementation.
Here, we are capturing ADC for imported scrap at the time of posting J1IEX, which is not known at the time of punching PO. a nominal value has been maintained using JAOQ condition type.
While posting J1IEX, the actual excise values (BED, ECESS and SECESS) as in Traders excise invoice is captured including ADC.
All the values except AED (captured ADC) is flowing from J1IEX to MIRO, where as AED (JMOQ) is being picked up from Purchase order.
But this is not the case if JAOP is used to capture ADC in tax procedure. the changed AED value in J1IEX is flowing to MIRO.
Is this SAP standard behavior or is that SAP has not tested these scenarios?
kindly help to solve the issue.
Thanks in advance.
Ashwin..

Hi Shankar,
Thanks for the reply.
well, AED is almost non existent now. at least not in the scenario i have explained. this is about procurement of Metal Scrap. so the SAD that the import vendor has taken credit of is transferred to us through a dealer.
with JAOP, i can increase or decrease the value of AED mentioned in PO. but this is not happening with JAOQ (value condition).
With JAOQ, the value flows from PO, with JAOP, the value flows from J1IEX.
please let me know, if you require any more clarification on the above scenario.
Thanks again for the help
Ashwin.

Excise Duty Value not flow from J1IJ to VF01

Hi SAP Expert,
I am facing the problem in Invoice to Customer(from Depot). Excise Values are not flowing from J1IJ for pricing procedure JINDEP. I maintained Alt Cal type as 356 in Pricing procedure JINDEP for Excise condition types JEXP. But it is still not flowing. I am using Tax Procedure TAXINN.
Do I need to go to VTFL In item level copying requirement to set pricing type: to C ??
But once i set, it will impact other billing document too. Please advise.
Thanks.

Hi,
I have successfully posted Excise Invoice at Depot using J1iJ.
When i create billing via Vf01, i am unable to see the value of Excise Duty in item pricing condition from J1iJ.
I analyse the pricing condition for condition type JEXP, below is what i got :
This message tells you that the condition record exists, but has not been set in the document. If pricing was carried out again for the document item, then the condition would be set.
There are different reasons for this:
1.The condition was deleted manually in the item condition screen.
2. The condition record was created later. Please note that order processing and pricing have buffer mechanisms. This means that a newly added condition record might only be found after order processing has been left completely and then started again.
If the condition type is used for subsequent settlement (rebate), there may be subsequent updating of business volume (the agreement is is created retrospectively). The document conditions do not contain the condition record, as the condition record was not created when pricing was carried out. Updating of business volume is carried out using special functions for subsequent settlement.
1. When an item was added, the condition record was accessed with key fields other than change time. This could lead to different results in the requirements check at the time of adding and the change time. This can occur when modifications are made.
2. In billing (or when copying orders): Certain condition types were not determined in the source document (this is usually controlled by the pricing requirements). When creating the document, the document flow (TVCPF,TVCPA) is processed using a pricing type that does not redetermine these condition types, although they are supposed to be called via the requirements.
Is it correct that i assigned routine 356 to Pricing Condition JINDEP ?

Tax error while posting an invoice in SRM

We are using SRM 5.5 SP4, ECS and ECC 6.0. We are using vertex for tax caluculation and we configured the tax calculation to always occur in ECC.
One more important point is, client has decided to use invoicing in SRM. Now the problem is we ran in to so many tax related issues and we opened OSS messages for this but SAP did not help. Let me explain the problem in detail.
1) We used to get "Tax jurisdiction code could not be determined" error while creating shopping cart, but we implemented note 436760 and hardcoded a value and got rid of that error.
2) When we create a SC, the copy of PO is created in ECC and vertex is called for tax calculation and tax is calculated properly based on the tax hierarchy except when you use the Shipping Address (external), so when I used the delivery address other than plant, it should calculate based on that address but it was not doing that, its calculating based on the cost object's jurisdiction code. For this problem, we have implemented ME_ADDRESS BADI in ECC, but with this BADI, it is always taking delivery address's jurisdiction code, which is also wrong.
The tax jurisdiction determination should be from 1) Delivery address if its different from plant, else it should look in to the cost object, else storage location then plant.
So we implemented the above logic in that BADI and there is no problem with PO taxes.
3) When we create an invoice with reference to PO, the invoice verification program is always determining the tax jurisdiction code from plant even though the taxes on PO are calculated based on cost object, hence the IDOC is erroring out by saying there is a difference in tax.
So we implemented the user exit and used the same logic of tax determination and its fixed now.
4) Finally, we are trying to create invoices without PO's in SRM, here no tax calculation is happending in SRM, but when we try to post the invoice in to ECC, we are getting the following error
"SAX processing failed on input stream#SAX processing failed when attempting to add child element to parent. (parent element=com.vertexinc.tps.common.domain.LineItem, child element=com.vertexinc.tps.x.."
So I am not sure how to fix this, we are at the dead end now out of ideas, so trying to get some help from experts like you about looking at this problem in a different angle. Now there are a couple of questions I can ask you
1) Did we do something wrong by selecting R/3 as the tax calculation system, if not is it difficult to fix this error and move forward?
2) What if we need to change the design and start calculating the taxes in SRM by connecting SRM to Vertex, will there be any new challenges? and do you have any config doc for this? Also we are implementing this rollout for US, Canada and Mexico companies.
I would really appreciate if you can reply me with your valuable input. You can also email me if @ [email protected]
Thanks a lot,
Sreedhar

Hi
It's recommended to have the same Tax related configuration data replicated in SRM system from R/3 as well.
I don't recommeded you to go with Hard-coding of tax codes.
We have faced similar issues with Delivery address and we have to solve it using our custom logic inside the BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI and BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK BADIs.
Anyways, send the detailed business requirements to my mail which are already having with you. )
I will definitely help you out.
Please refer to following threads as well.
sales tax gurus
How to display country related tax codes in SRM
e-Invoice tax calculation.
Tax code T1 does not exist for jurisdiction code error in shopping basket
Drill down facility not working for Tax codes ....Urgent!!!!!
Tax Issue
Tax Calculation
Tax setting in Extended Classic Scenario
Withholding Tax in SRM5.0
IDOCS for Tax Information
Taxes in Bid Invitation
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
Regards
- Atul

Revenue not flowing from Sales order to PS so no WIP in PS/WIP

Hi,
We are following PS with MTO scenario.
For calculating WIP in projects we are unable to get the actual revenue flow from Sales order to PS so entire amount in PS/WBS is sitting in WIP but its wrong.
User wants to do the Delivery and billing form Sales order only.
Can you please help us how to calculate the WIP in this scenaio.
Thanks,

Hi,
Have you made the account assignment as WBS Element in the SO line item. Ift his is done, once you create an invoice from SO the actual revenue will get updated in WBS Element.
Regards
Sreekanth

Vendor Ref. Number from A/P Invoice & Credit Memo in the Check PLD Form

Hi Guys,
We have standard PLD layout form for the Check Document. In our case the Check Document based on the outgoing payment and outgoing payment referenced on A/P Invoice and Credit Memo documents.
Is there someone who knows how to get "Vendor Ref. Number" (NumAtCard) field from A/P Invoice and Credit Memo in the Cheque form?
Any ideas will be appreciated.
Thanks so much,
Sergey

Hi Nagarajan,
Thanks a lot for your answer! Yes, you are absolutely right, the variable number for this field was #100.
Unfortunately, this solution worked partially for us. In our case, we also needed to specify a "Document Date" (Tax Date) for the ref. document and there was a problem, because we could not find SAP variable number for this (I don't know if this exists?)
In the final, I just related "OJDT" to "VPM2" table and after that I have got my "TaxDate" field.
So we are good now.
In addition, maybe you know where can I get a variable numbers catalogue or something like that?
Thanks,
Sergey

Manual Input of TAx Amount in Sales AR Invoice

Hi Experts!
Is there a way where we can do a manual recording of tax amount in Sales AR Invoice (just like in AP Invoice, we can manually input tax amount)?
Hope to hear from you soon,
Thanks

Hi Sandra,
You can't override the AR tax calculation amount. You can control how much tax is calculated for each row (i.e. some may be non-taxable).
Otherwise, there may be an adjustment that falls under the rounding field. Check the Help file for more info on this field to determine which option in Document Settings you want to select.
Heather

Input Tax code from logical partner LS but not from indiv vendor partner LI

Hi,
Find that tax code at vendor invoice is being taken from logical partner (LS) , but not from the individual vendor partner number (LI) . Bothe the partners are maintained in WE20 , OBCA , OBCD & OMRY.
Like to know the reason / setting to pick up tax code from logical partner (tax rates are same in both cases).
With regards,
Mrinal

Hi Dove,
I think you can use a substitution for field Bank Type at Item Level (TCODE OBBH). This would fill your bank type when you post the document in FI, then you won't have problems in F110.
Hope that helps.Cheers.
Ignacio.

A JE created from the AP Invoice does not include the project # on all trx

A JE created from the AP Invoice does not
include the project # for the amounts entered in the freight box. To
duplicate, do the following:
1. Open an AP Invoice
2. Enter BP Code
3. Select Service type
4. Enter a Project Code in drop down box on Accounting tab
5. Enter a line in the Contents; specify GL Account, amount and Tax
Code Open Freight box
6. Enter an amount in one of the lines
7. Click ADD
8. Go back to the invoice and go to the Accounting tab Click on the GL
journal note and you can see that the line corresponding to the
contents line has a project, but the line corresponding to the Freight
box item does not.
My customer users these projects when printing GL agings and the
information is very important. Shouldn't this information be carried
forward on all transactions on the Journal entry? Is there a way to get this information to post?

Hi Pat,
the project code (PC) on the marketing document may only be applied to the business partner (BP), hence the only row in the associated journal entry (JE) with this project code is that of the BP.
You can link project codes to specific accounts (CoA -> select account -> account details -> project code) & this project code will then be assigned every time the account is found in a JE.
If you require the project code to be applied to the freight, you may assign this project code to the account you have defined for this freight. The drawback is naturally that the project code will then be pulled every time this freight is used, regardless of whether or not the PC is associated with the BP or not.
It is possible to manually assign project codes to every row in a journal entry, hence this should also be possible with SDK. You might explore the possibility whether it might be possible to automatically assign the BP PC to all rows in the JE using a script.
All the best,
Kerstin

Depot Sales-Excise values are not flowing from J1iJ to VF01

Hi Gurus,
In Depot Sales: while doing excise invoive from T-code J1iJ Go to delivery -RG23D selection select the delivery number XXXXX Excise Group 51 and series Group: 50 ENTER - select the line item and click on F6 and here we have to click on excise invoice Button for capturing the Input excise duties for taking the reference. And the excise values are shown here correctly.
Issue: In VF01- when we are raising the commercial invoice , the duty values are not flowing from the J1IJ transaction. Instead the values are showing Zero for all the three condition types namely JEXP, JECS and JHCS. We have used the Pricing Procedure ZINDEP and 356 routine.
Inputs on this how to solve will be highly appreciated.. as we are in critical stage.
What are the checks to be ensured to Get the values flow from J1IJ to VF01.
Scenario: STO from Mfrg Plant to Depot and Depot sales to customer.
Me21N-Me29N-VL10B-VL02N-VF01-J1IIn-MIGO-(STO process completes)-VA01-VL01N-J1IJ-VF01(duty values should flow from the J1IJ referenced Excise Invoice) Correct me if I am wrong.
Any user exits, Notes please let me know. I could not find any. I have gone through the forum threads, which speaks about 356 routine, J1ID- checks etc.
Thanks&Regards
Sreekanth:

Hi!
Am sure you would have captured the Excise at Depot with J1IG.
Also, have you saved the billing document to check the duties?
Thirdly, after save, again open the billing doc and go to Header-Conditions then Save. This part does not seems logical, but i am sharing my practical experience.
Please check condition records if any.
Regards
Arun

Tax Jurisdiction issues in AR Invoice Creation

MODULE = AR
EBS Version = R12.1
EBS Tax is setup
Hi All
I am currently trying to mimic the functionality in the front end of AR Transaction workbench from the back end via Auto Invoice process
From the front end+
When I manually create an invoice and create an invoice line, I get 3 tax lines automatically created. These 3 lines correspond to the State, City and County Tax .
The values I get for Tax fields are =>
Tax Regime Code = US_SALES_USE_TAX,
Tax = CITY, COUNTY or STATE,
TAX Jurisdiction = ATLANTA, FULTON, GEORGIA (Sample)
Rate = (1.0, 4.0, 2.0) (Sample)
and so on
Backend*
Now from the backend, I am trying to convert legacy invoices using AutoInvoice.
So when I pass the values of Tax Jurisdiction = ATLANTA, FULTON, GEORGIA (Sample) for my 3 tax lines, I get an error of undefined Tax Jurisdiction.
Of course when I query the jurisdictions table, ZX_JURISDICTIONS_B, these values are not defined.
So the question is how do these values get populated from the front end but not from the back end.
I want to create tax lines and tax amounts from the legacy data and show the tax amounts as they are brought over from data extract i.e. I do not want EBS tax to calculate tax for me - rather just let me pass amounts in the RA_INTERFACE_LINES_ALL table
I have read the metalink id 731149.1 and I am basically using that to create manual tax lines. If I pass one of the values that is defined in the ZX_JURISDICTIONS_B table, I am able to create a tax line, but the jurisdiction code defined there are wierd ( sample jurisdiction defined = ST-370000000)
Bottom line is that the ZX_JURISDICTIONS table does not have state, city county names defined in the table but it still shows them when tax lines are automatically created for manual invoices.
When I try to populate those in the RA_INTERFACE_LINES_ALL table I get an error.
Thanks
Also is it possible to post screenshots in Oracle Forums ?
Edited by: user13293643 on Aug 30, 2010 8:19 AM

From my point of view you have only 1 chance:
- Find a criteria of the imported invoices, which is avaible in the Tax Rules as condition (e.g. specific transaction types or you used a specific tax code by the import)
- Put the tax line manual in the Autoinvoice from the frond end system
- Defined a rule for each tax in the EBS Tax manager: Principell logic: If Tax_Code/transaction type = ABC then tax non-applicable
Which this rule, no standard tax code is selected by EBS Tax, the tax is disable for the transaction and only the imported tax lines are booked.
By my last customer I had the same problem and we have investigate many time.
We have used for the imported invoices special tax codes and these tax code used for the disable of the tax in the tax rules.

Tax flow from SABRIX to Invoice

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for