Tax not calculated in MIRO for the condition type JVCD

Hi,
We made some new different tax code and attached with JVCD , its calculating in PO but in MIRO calculation part not done but for other condition type ,JVRD,JVRN system calculating well...
Please tell me some way why not system calculating in case of JVCD and JVCN for capital case..
Thanks in Advance,
Dharmveer

Hi,
We totally agreed with you and already we checked our configuration part is OK.Actually we want to map some process where we captured excise in GR but no need to take credit i.e. to post the excise in J1IEX,so we do not have to post our cenvat/modvat entry in MIRO but we need to calculate VAT whether it is deductible or non deductible.So far this thing is concerned,we made separate tax code which we use at time of MIRO posting and in configuration we did not attached the tax code in logitics-basic excise -assign to company code. Because once we attached here , system asking to make to pass furst RG part2 entry then it allows to post MIRO entry which we do not want .So please understand this scenario is different and we got the success for JVRN/JVRD for VAT but getting issue in case of capital VAT where system does not calculate tax for JVCN/JVCD .....where we want to process MIRO without posting J1IEX..
Please thing and analyse ..give some helping response..
Thanks,
Dharmveer

Similar Messages

Tax value is not picked up correctly for the condition type in SO creation

Hi All,
I have a issue in Picking up Tax value correctly for the condition type in SO Creation.
Actual Issue:
When creating the sales order manually,
tax value is picked up correctly for one condition type: ISS3.
When the Sales Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders', tax value is not picked for same condition type: ISS3.
We need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked in this way!
Can anybody solve this issue!
What can be the reason which is stopping picking up tax value for condition type: ISS3 when Sales Order is created via F.M 'IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS'! While it picked up the same while creating Sales Order manuallly.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Hi All,
Can anybody give the solution for above posted issue!
Working:
When creating the sales order manually,
tax value is picked up correctly for the condition type ISS3.
Actual Issue:
When the Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders',
tax value is not picked .
I need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked.
I have debugged the issue from WE19 but upto Conditions tab it is picking up tax value but then it is becoming zero again it remains zero after saving SO.
But Manually tax value is picked up for condition type ISS3 and remains same after saving order.
I have debugged it several times fro WE19 but not able to find route cause for the issue.
What can be the issue over here!
Can anybody give me solution for the same!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

In sales order for the condition type MWST, **Tax code** is displaying wron

Hi
In sales order for the condition type MWST, *Tax code* is displaying wrongly at header level i.e. FF instead of AO (under account determination tab)
AO tax is 0% but for FF it is 19%
I have checked with the Access sequence it is picking access 08 correctly according to this it should show AO in tax code field for MWST but it is not so..
There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
Even if I consider material tax classification and customer tax code should not be FF because tax code FF is not maintained for the combination of access sequences for condition type MWST
Please help me.
Rajendra Prasad

Dear Rajendra,
There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
Definitely material Tax classification will influence to determine the Tax code.
-->So Make sure that customer and material master having proper tax classification indicator.
-->Have you Update the price after changing the tax classification in the sales order.by going to item dat -->condition tab then click on Update push button bottom of the conditions screen.
-->Once again the check the condition record maintanence also for your MWST access sequence.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Tax not calculating in MIRO within a date range.

Hi Experts ,
We have created a tax code and assign its values in condition types under two separate Key Combination.
1) Tax Classification : 4% ( Non Validity) , in access sequence exclusive indicator is set aganst it.
2) Tax Code : 4% (Valdity - Sept - till 9999), Exclusive indicator is not set against it.
Issue is that when i create a PO ( at any date) system is picking up the taxes.
Nom at the time of MIRO , if i post the MIRO before sept. system is allowing me to do so and calculate taxes correctly.
But when i change the date to Sept the system does not calculate taxes.
Even though the Tax Classification has more priority in access sequence compared to tax code , i am failed to understand why system is not calculating taxes.
I have tried deleting conditions in tax code key combinations but still system is not calculating taxes in MIRO,
Pls guide.
Regards
Honey

Hi Ramesh ,
i have done the same . Maintained he condition record via FV11. but system is not calculating tax for sept. month in MIRO.
In PO tax calculation is perfect but in MIRO it is not calculating tax.( ticked calculate tax option also).

Checking for the condition types using case statement

hi folks,
I have a lot of condition types that I have to check for and I am using case statement to do that. The code goes like this.
case wac-kschl.
        when 'ZRAT' OR 'ZAGR' OR 'ZRCR' OR
              'Y098' OR 'Y007' OR 'ZREW' OR 'Y106'        OR 'ZTSR' OR 'Y127' OR 'Y125' OR 'Y126' OR 'Y124' OR 'Y157' OR 'Y092' OR 'Y085' OR 'Y090' OR 'ZMZD'
OR 'Y215' OR 'Y214' OR 'Y111' OR 'ZC$D' OR 'ZAUD'.
up till here it is working on errors and when I add few more condition types to the case statement it is throwing the error.
I have to check for all the condition types out here.
How can I correct it? Is there a better way to do it?
thanks
Santhosh

Hi Santhosh,
I think that your CASE statement has a flaw. The line length of one of the lines is too large. You need to insert a carriage-return to shorten it (or press the button 'Pretty Printer').
The code would look nicer like this:[code] CASE wac-kschl.
    WHEN 'ZRAT' OR 'ZAGR' OR 'ZRCR' OR 'Y098' OR 'Y007' OR 'ZREW'
      OR 'Y106' OR 'ZTSR' OR 'Y127' OR 'Y125' OR 'Y126' OR 'Y124'
      OR 'Y157' OR 'Y092' OR 'Y085' OR 'Y090' OR 'ZMZD' OR 'Y215'
      OR 'Y214' OR 'Y111' OR 'ZC$D' OR 'ZAUD' OR 'Z001' OR 'Z002'
      OR 'Z003' OR 'Z004' OR 'Z005' OR 'Z006' OR 'Z007' OR 'Z008'
      OR 'Z009' OR 'Z010' OR 'Z011' OR 'Z012' OR 'Z013' OR 'Z014'.
    Do your thing here
      WRITE: / 'OK'.
    WHEN OTHERS.
      WRITE: / 'NOT OK'.
ENDCASE.[/code]If this will not work for you, you could try a different approach:[code]* Local definition
DATA:
    var_list(1024).
Build variable string for checking
CONCATENATE 'ZRAT ZAGR ZRCR Y098'
              'Y007 ZREW Y106 ZTSR'
              'Y127 Y125 Y126 Y124'
              'Y157 Y092 Y085 Y090'
              'ZMZD Y215 Y214 Y111'
              'ZC$D ZAUD'
         INTO var_list
    SEPARATED BY space.
Check if the correct value is supplied
IF var_list CS wac-kschl.
Do your thing here
    WRITE: / 'OK'.
ENDIF.[/code]Hope this helps you a bit.
Regards,
Rob.

Taxes not calculated in MIRO

Hi,
We are using TAXINN procedure and we maintained all the relevent condition records for excise and VAT. The excise and VAT are getting properly calulated in PO and all the accounting entries in GR and J1IEX_P are correct.
However at the time of MIRO, evem after making a tick in the "Calculate taxes" check box, the taxes are not getting calulated. The tax code used is V0-zero tax.
Is any customising setting required ?
Thanks,
SR

Hello,
1. Create new tax code in FTXP.
2. Assign the tax code to company code (SPRO >> Logistic general >> Tax on goods movement >> India >> Basic settings >> Determination of excise duty >> Condition based excise determination >> Assign tax code to company codes
3. In access sequence JTAX include table 003-Tax Classification at the top before Plant/Vendor/Material - 363
4.Now matain the condition record for new tax code in fv11 for plant material and vendor combination for your condtion types like JMOP, JVRD etc also matain the set-off condition type also.
Regards,
Shailesh

Migo reference document not appearing in miro for frieght conditions

Dear all,
I ahve done migo for a po and i have checked GR based invoice in PO.When i am doing MIRO i am not getting the migo reference number for frieght condition where as the migo reference number is appearing for base price.How to get that migo reference number for frieght conditions also.
thanks in advance
regards
vithal

Sometimes the the MIGO creator might have reversed the same. In such cases the reversal document may be with different number in the same series and both posted & reversed documents will not appear in MIRO. Since you might checking with posted document number, you are seeing the blank in MIRO. In such cases, just enter the PO number in MIRO, give date & reference number press Show PO structure button in the left corner. You will find the following screen
Expand the required once. The following screen appears. In this both positive & negative numbers with same reference & document type appearing are the reversed documents.
Hope this is clear

Tax not calculating in MIRO

Hi ,
I have created on PO in which system showing exicse and VAT amount.
But while doing MIRO it is not showing any tax and exice even though i selected calculate tax option.
Regards,
Ravindra

Hi,
See the material document whether Tax code assigned or not in MIGO
if assign that untill and unless taxcode not appear in MIRO to book the entry.
Hope if it useful assign points
Regards,
Sankar

Dates in the condition record maintenance for the condition type?

Hi,
Condition type has the following dates when maintaining the condition record,
Valid from date:
Valid on :
Please ellaborate on the above dates?
Thanks

Dear Rajiv
Valid from date:- The date from which the said condition type is applicable. For example, in VK11, if you changed (let us assume PR00 changed to Rs.250 from 200) a condition with a date as 01-06-08 in the above field, only from 1st of June'08, whatever sale orders you generated, revised value of Rs.250 will flow in the respective sale orders. Whatever created b4 1st June'08 will be having Rs.200.
Valid on :- As in the above case, if you input a date as 30-05-08 for the above condition type, system will populate Rs.200/- and if you input 01-06-08, it will propose Rs.250/-.
Hope this explanation is suffice for you to understand the difference between the two fields.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Withholding tax not calculating in MIRO and calculating in F-43

Hi,
Whenever I am positng invoice thru F-43, Calculating withholding tax amount and generating seperate line item for that.
But for same vendor after posting MM cycle( PO - GR -MIRO) and I am posting Invoice thru MIRO WHT line item not generating while simulating and also after posting.
Checks done :
1. In vendor master data Liable check box is ticked and Tax codes are properly maintained.
2. Minimun and maximum amounts checked.
3.Base amounts checked.
4. Formula for WHT checked
5. I feel if these setting are not good,it should not post in F-43 also. But it is posting in F-43.
Kinldy tell me any specific setting for calculating the WHT thru transaction MIRO
Thanks in advance

Shankar,
Thanks for reply.
If I don't put amount in the basic data tab( MIRO) then it does not allow to "simulate" or "Post". But here I can simulate and Post
I check every thing in WHT Config but I could't found the solution.
I want to tell another thing, we recently went to patch upgrade from Version 4.7 E SP 22 to 4.7 E SP30.
My question, Is the pacth upgrade affects in anyway???
If any suitable answer appreciatable.
Thanks once again for your reply.

Default Currency for freight condition type in sales order

Hi Gurus,
I have Freight condition type, maintained condition record with combination of Customer, Incoterms & Material Group.
In Customer Master Currency is USD or EURO.
When we create Export sales order, so by default currency should come INR, not USD or EURO for Freight condition type from Customer master.
How to get this requirement.
Regards,
Rakesh

Hi Rakesh,
I think you need a revision on condition table and access sequence for frieght condition records from SD >> basic functions >> pricing >> pricing control >> follow standard pricing configs. Actually, you need to add country ( ALAND ) and destination country ( LLAND ) fields to your table and access sequence for export sales.
After those configs, you can create records in USD or EURO for domestic sales and create records INR currency for export processes.
I hope you can neet your requirement by using this way.
Regards,

SSRS 2008 Column Chart with Calculated Series (moving average) "formula error - there are not enough data points for the period" error

I have a simple column chart grouping on 1 value on the category axis. For simplicity's sake, we are plotting $ amounts grouping by Month on the category axis. I right click on the data series and choose "Add calculated series...". I choose moving average. I want to move the average over at least 2 periods.
When I run the report, I get the error "Formula error - there are not enough data points for the period". The way the report is, I never have a guaranteed number of categories (there could be one or there could be 5). When there is 2 or more, the chart renders fine, however, when there is only 1 value, instead of suppressing the moving average line, I get that error and the chart shows nothing.
I don't think this is entirely acceptable for our end users. At a minimum, I would think the moving average line would be suppressed instead of hiding the entire chart. Does anyone know of any workarounds or do I have to enter another ms. connect bug/design consideration.
Thank you,
Dan

I was having the same error while trying to plot a moving average across 7 days. The work around I found was rather simple.
If you right click your report in the solution explorer and select "View Code" it will give you the underlying XML of the report. Find the entry for the value of your calculated series and enter a formula to dynamically create your periods.
<ChartFormulaParameter Name="Period">
<Value>=IIf(Count(Fields!Calls.Value) >= 7 ,7, (Count(Fields!Calls.Value)))</Value>
</ChartFormulaParameter>
What I'm doing here is getting the row count of records returned in the chart. If the returned rows are greater than or equal to 7 (The amount of days I want the average) it will set the points to 7. If not, it will set the number to the amount of returned rows. So far this has worked great. I'm probably going to add more code to handle no records returned although in my case that shouldn't happen but, you never know.
A side note:
If you open the calculated series properties in the designer, you will notice the number of periods is set to "0". If you change this it will overwrite your custom formula in the XML.

Price was not picking from the Condition type for Item Category 'P' in PO

Hi Experts,
I Created one condition type based on Material and WBS which price was fixed based on this
I used the Purchase Order having Item Category P or Q Price should pick from the condition type where I mapped the WBS Element and Material.
The Net price was not picking from the Condition type Record. Why? What should be the Problem?
Whether my logic is correct or not?

The Scenario: I want to fix the Material price base on each WBS Element for a Project. For each WBS Element the Price will be various for same material.
Please help on this.
Thanks
Muthukumar

Hi,
In standard configuration you cannot set item delivery date as a pricing data.
Maybe you shoud look at SAP enchancement - in dedicated structures you can pass additional item data (structure KOKMP).
IMG link:
Materials Management -> Purchasing -> Conditions -> Define Price Determination Process -> System Enhancements
hope it helps.
regards,
wojciech

Service PO is not picking the condition type defined for services

Hi Friends,
I am trying to create a PO for services.. but in conditions tab..the system is picking standard PO pricing procedure. It is not picking the service Pricing procedure MS0000. request your help in understanding the issue.
Also the PO is picking the Standard PO release strategy, but not the release startegy define for service..
thank you.
Kireeti

Hi Kireeti,
Your condition schemes for services probably have been modified. Please check
schemes MS0000 and MS0001 in your customizing. For a correct price
determination it is important that for example condition type PRS
is in the first position, further the settings for the flag
'Condition determined manually' should'nt be altered.
Actually the standard schema looks like:
4 0 PRS Total Price                       X 5
5 1 PRS0 General Price Compon             X
5 3 PRS1 Percentage of Wage               X
5 5 PRS2 Overheads                        X
5 7 PRS3 Misc Price Component             X
13 0 KR01 Header Discount                 X
14 0 KZ01 Header Surcharge                X
Could you please change your schema and retest?.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Calculation formula userexit not working for multiple condition types

Hi,
we have a problem in the CRM ISA-B2B scenario where the custom user exit is only working for single condition type.
but we need it for multiple condition types .
the value of the subtotal is not being retrieved for multiple conditions. at a time only one condition value is being retrieved and shown in the webshop - shopping basket.
for ex:
we have scenario 1 where Y001 -Freight condition type is applicable for one customer.and Y002 is applicable for another customer.
when we are trying to show the subtotal condition value in the webshop by using a single custom user exit in the pricing procedure it is only working for either of the above 2 customers depending on the VMC cache status.
is there any problem if use the single user exit for both condition types?
and if it needs to be differentiated how exactly we can do that with the same logic in the java class.
Thanks in advance,
PSR.

Hi Arshi,
below is the code:
public class ZValFormula_ZZWI1 extends ValueFormulaAdapter {
     private static String zzwi = "ZZWI1";
     private static char zzwiC = '@';
     private static UserexitLogger userexitlogger = new UserexitLogger(
     ZValFormula_ZZWI1.class);
     public BigDecimal overwriteConditionValue(IPricingItemUserExit item,
               IPricingConditionUserExit condition) {
          ICurrencyValue val = condition.getConditionValue();
          userexitlogger.writeLogDebug( "value saved for " + zzwi + " (" + zzwiC + ") = "
                    + val.getValueAsString());
          item.setSubtotal( zzwiC, val.getValue());
          return val.getValue();
hope this would give more idea to look at the problem.
Thanks,
PSR

Tax not calculated in MIRO for the condition type JVCD

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for