Tax value is not picked up correctly for the condition type in SO creation

Hi All,
I have a issue in Picking up Tax value correctly for the condition type in SO Creation.
Actual Issue:
When creating the sales order manually,
tax value is picked up correctly for one condition type: ISS3.
When the Sales Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders', tax value is not picked for same condition type: ISS3.
We need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked in this way!
Can anybody solve this issue!
What can be the reason which is stopping picking up tax value for condition type: ISS3 when Sales Order is created via F.M 'IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS'! While it picked up the same while creating Sales Order manuallly.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Hi All,
Can anybody give the solution for above posted issue!
Working:
When creating the sales order manually,
tax value is picked up correctly for the condition type ISS3.
Actual Issue:
When the Order is created via Idoc using the function module 'idoc_input_orders',
tax value is not picked .
I need to find out why the value for the condition type 'ISS3' is not picked.
I have debugged the issue from WE19 but upto Conditions tab it is picking up tax value but then it is becoming zero again it remains zero after saving SO.
But Manually tax value is picked up for condition type ISS3 and remains same after saving order.
I have debugged it several times fro WE19 but not able to find route cause for the issue.
What can be the issue over here!
Can anybody give me solution for the same!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Similar Messages

  • Tax not calculated in MIRO for the condition type JVCD

    Hi,
    We made some new different tax code and attached with JVCD , its calculating in PO but in MIRO calculation part not done but for other condition type ,JVRD,JVRN system calculating well...
    Please tell me some way why not system calculating in case of JVCD and JVCN for capital case..
    Thanks in Advance,
    Dharmveer

    Hi,
    We totally agreed with you and already we checked our configuration part is OK.Actually we want to map some process where we captured excise in GR but no need to take credit i.e. to post the excise in J1IEX,so we do not have to post our cenvat/modvat entry in MIRO but we need to calculate VAT whether it is deductible or non deductible.So far this thing is concerned,we made separate tax code which we use at time of MIRO posting and in configuration we did not attached the tax code in logitics-basic excise -assign to company code. Because once we attached here , system asking to make to pass furst RG part2 entry then it allows to post MIRO entry which we do not want .So please understand this scenario is different and we got the success for JVRN/JVRD for VAT but getting issue in case of capital VAT where system does not calculate tax for JVCN/JVCD .....where we want to process MIRO without posting J1IEX..
    Please thing and analyse ..give some helping response..
    Thanks,
    Dharmveer

  • In sales order for the condition type MWST, **Tax code** is displaying wron

    Hi
    In sales order for the condition type MWST, *Tax code* is displaying wrongly at header level i.e. FF instead of AO (under account determination tab)
    AO tax is 0% but for FF it is 19%
    I have checked with the Access sequence it is picking access 08 correctly according to this it should show AO in tax code field for MWST but it is not so..
    There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
    Even if I consider material tax classification and customer tax code  should not be FF because  tax code  FF is not maintained for the combination of access sequences for condition type MWST
    Please help me.
    Rajendra Prasad

    Dear Rajendra,
    There is a manual change for tax classification for material master in va02 initially it was blank now it is changed to ' 0 ' is any way influencing....?
    Definitely material Tax classification will influence to determine the Tax code.
    -->So Make sure that customer and material master having proper tax classification indicator.
    -->Have you Update the price after changing the tax classification in the sales order.by going to item dat -->condition tab then click on Update push button bottom of the conditions screen.
    -->Once again the check the condition record maintanence also for your MWST access sequence.
    I hope this will help you,
    Regards,
    Murali.

  • Checking for the condition types using case statement

    hi folks,
    I have a lot of condition types that I have to check for and I am using case statement to do that. The code goes like this.
    case wac-kschl.
            when 'ZRAT' OR 'ZAGR' OR 'ZRCR' OR
                  'Y098' OR 'Y007' OR 'ZREW' OR 'Y106'        OR 'ZTSR' OR 'Y127' OR 'Y125' OR 'Y126' OR 'Y124' OR 'Y157' OR 'Y092' OR 'Y085' OR 'Y090' OR 'ZMZD'
    OR 'Y215' OR 'Y214' OR 'Y111' OR 'ZC$D' OR 'ZAUD'.
    up till here it is working on errors and when I add few more condition types to the case statement it is throwing the error.
    I have to check for all the condition types out here.
    How can I correct it? Is there a better way to do it?
    thanks
    Santhosh

    Hi Santhosh,
    I think that your CASE statement has a flaw. The line length of one of the lines is too large. You need to insert a carriage-return to shorten it (or press the button 'Pretty Printer').
    The code would look nicer like this:[code]  CASE wac-kschl.
        WHEN 'ZRAT' OR 'ZAGR' OR 'ZRCR' OR 'Y098' OR 'Y007' OR 'ZREW'
          OR 'Y106' OR 'ZTSR' OR 'Y127' OR 'Y125' OR 'Y126' OR 'Y124'
          OR 'Y157' OR 'Y092' OR 'Y085' OR 'Y090' OR 'ZMZD' OR 'Y215'
          OR 'Y214' OR 'Y111' OR 'ZC$D' OR 'ZAUD' OR 'Z001' OR 'Z002'
          OR 'Z003' OR 'Z004' OR 'Z005' OR 'Z006' OR 'Z007' OR 'Z008'
          OR 'Z009' OR 'Z010' OR 'Z011' OR 'Z012' OR 'Z013' OR 'Z014'.
        Do your thing here
          WRITE: / 'OK'.
        WHEN OTHERS.
          WRITE: / 'NOT OK'.
      ENDCASE.[/code]If this will not work for you, you could try a different approach:[code]* Local definition
      DATA:
        var_list(1024).
    Build variable string for checking
      CONCATENATE 'ZRAT ZAGR ZRCR Y098'
                  'Y007 ZREW Y106 ZTSR'
                  'Y127 Y125 Y126 Y124'
                  'Y157 Y092 Y085 Y090'
                  'ZMZD Y215 Y214 Y111'
                  'ZC$D ZAUD'
             INTO var_list
        SEPARATED BY space.
    Check if the correct value is supplied
      IF var_list CS wac-kschl.
      Do your thing here
        WRITE: / 'OK'.
      ENDIF.[/code]Hope this helps you a bit.
    Regards,
    Rob.

  • Dates in the condition record maintenance for the condition type?

    Hi,
    Condition type has the following dates when maintaining the condition record,
    Valid from date:
    Valid on :
    Please ellaborate on the  above dates?
    Thanks

    Dear Rajiv
    Valid from date:-   The date from which the said condition type is applicable.  For example, in VK11, if you changed (let us assume PR00 changed to Rs.250 from 200) a condition with a date as  01-06-08 in the above field, only from 1st of June'08, whatever sale orders you generated, revised value of Rs.250 will flow in the respective sale orders.  Whatever created b4 1st June'08 will be having Rs.200.
    Valid on :-  As in the above case, if you input a date as 30-05-08 for the above condition type, system will populate Rs.200/- and if you input 01-06-08, it will propose Rs.250/-.
    Hope this explanation is suffice for you to understand the difference between the two fields.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Default Currency for freight condition type in sales order

    Hi Gurus,
    I have  Freight condition type, maintained condition record with combination of Customer, Incoterms & Material Group.
    In Customer Master Currency is USD or EURO.
    When we create Export sales order, so by default currency should come INR, not USD or EURO for Freight condition type from Customer master.
    How to get this requirement.
    Regards,
    Rakesh

    Hi Rakesh,
    I think you need a revision on condition table and access sequence for frieght condition records from SD >> basic functions >> pricing >> pricing control >> follow standard pricing configs. Actually, you need to add country ( ALAND ) and  destination country ( LLAND ) fields to your table and access sequence for export sales.
    After those configs,  you can create records in USD or EURO for domestic sales and create records INR currency for export processes.
    I hope you can neet your requirement by using this way.
    Regards,

  • Excise base value is not picking for Imports

    Dear All,
         Excise base value is not picking for Imports when doing MIGO and BED/E CESS/S&H E CESS also not picking.
              Please suggest me
    Thanks,
    Tiru

    Hi,
    In case of Imports, you have to define following condiiton types in MM Pricing Procedure;
    JCDB     IN:Basic Custom Duty
    JCV1     IN : CVD
    JECV     IN : Ed Cess on CVD
    J1CV     IN : H&SECess on CVD
    JEDB     IN : Ed Cess on BCD
    JSDB     IN : H&SECess on BCD
    JADC     Addnl Duty of Custom
    These should be created as a delivery cost condition in M/06. And assign the accruals to these in M/08.
    Folowing Gl Accounts will be assigned to those accruals in OBYC;
    CVD Clearing (For accrual of conditions JCV1, JECV, J1CV, JADC) and Customs Clearing (For accrual of conditions JCDB, JEDB, JSDB)
    Now follow the below procedure for Import Purchase;
    1. ME21N u2013 Create Import Purchase Order (Here assign the Vendor of Customs Office to the above mentioned 7 condition types in "Details" of "Conditions")
    2. MIRO u2013 Enter Customs Invoice w.r.t. Import PO (Here select "Planned Delivery Cost" and do LIV for Customs office Vendor, enter values for duties as per Bill of Entry manullay during LIV)
    3. J1IEX u2013 Capture Bill of Entry
    4. MIGO u2013 Goods Receipt against Import PO
    5. J1IEX u2013 Post Bill of Entry
    6. MIRO u2013 Enter Vendor Invoice
    7. MIRO u2013 Enter Clearing Agentu2019s Invoice

  • GLPCA table not getting updated correctly for VBUND

    Hi All,
    I have come across one issue that the value of trading partner field (VBUND) in table GLPCA are not getting updated correctly for document type KP.
    In vendor master this field has different value versus it is showing in GLPCA-VBUND.
    Does any one knows about ?
    Thanks for your help on it.
    Regards,
    Manoj

    Hi Sridhar,
    Thanks for your response on it.
    This note is not applicable for our system as we are working on 4.0B with support pack 52.
    Also we are getting this worng update of this field (GLPCA-VBUND) while doing MR11 creating document with doc. type KP. This value is not picking from vendor master (LAF1-VBUND) and randamly picking any value. Not sure from where ?
    Please advise your thought.
    Thanks,
    Manoj

  • TAX value is not triggerring in JVCD, JVRN(VAT non deductible)

    Hi All,
    Tax values are not triggering in JVCD, JVRN even though the non deductible key NVV assigned to it, and but in OB40 NVV key is not there, and calculation type 371 is assigned to it in taxinn procedure
    kindly suggest me the possible reasons..
    regards,
    sanju

    Hi,
    For VAT ,not required to have  calculation type 371 to assigned  in tax procedure for VAT condition types  JVCD, JVRN.
    As VAT to be inventorised, then assignment of  "NVV" acounting key in tax procedure is correct. If  VAT treat as offsetting entry, then need to have an  accounting key (  accounting key can be created in  OBCN) & assigned to VAT condition types  JVCD, JVRN and then assign  G/L account to  accounting key  in OB40.
    NOTE: But why you have two  condition types  JVCD, JVRN for VAT  inventorised,(non deductible)
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Price was not picking from the Condition type for Item Category 'P'  in PO

    Hi Experts,
    I Created one condition type based on Material and WBS which price was fixed based on this
    I used the Purchase Order having Item <b>Category ‘P’ or ‘Q’</b> Price should pick from the condition type where I mapped the WBS Element and Material.
    The Net price was not picking from the Condition type Record.  Why? What should be the Problem?
    Whether my logic is correct or not?
    <u><b>
    The Scenario:</b></u> I want to fix the Material price base on each WBS Element for a Project. For each WBS Element the Price will be various for same material.
    Please help on this.
    Thanks
    Muthukumar

    Hi,
    In standard configuration you cannot set item delivery date as a pricing data.
    Maybe you shoud look at SAP enchancement - in dedicated structures you can pass additional item data (structure KOKMP).
    IMG link:
    Materials Management -> Purchasing -> Conditions -> Define Price Determination Process -> System Enhancements
    hope it helps.
    regards,
    wojciech

  • CST Tax Value is not updating the Item Cost

    Dear All
    While doing the Pur. Invoice with CST the tax value is not geting add in item cost.
    I have already defined the tax type,tax code,attributes every thing perfectly with non deductible 100%, Even though this thing is not happening... pls tell me wat to do?
    SAP B1 2007B PL:07...
    Kindly waiting for ur valuable reply
    giri

    Hi Neetu
    Thanks a lot , as per ur term its working.
    Thanks d Regards
    Giridharan V

  • PO tax value is not added in net price

    Hi
    In PO tax value is not added in Net price .
    In the pricing elements it is showing the total value .
    But in the field of net value , it is not calculating the net value and so it is showing in the PO print out.
    Kindly advise.
    regards,

    Hi Sandeep,
    In case u want to print the net value with the tax u have to make the value as print relevant in the pricing procedure .
    And also u need to store this value in the field from  where the net price is printed and again this can be done in the pricing procedure.
    Hope this will help you .
    Please reward points for useful answer.
    Regards
    Mani

  • Service PO is not picking the condition type defined for services

    Hi Friends,
    I am trying to create a PO for services.. but in conditions tab..the system is picking standard PO pricing procedure. It is not picking the service Pricing procedure MS0000. request your help in understanding the issue.
    Also the PO is picking the Standard PO release strategy, but not the release startegy define for service..
    thank you.
    Kireeti

    Hi Kireeti,
    Your condition schemes for services probably have been modified. Please check
    schemes MS0000 and MS0001 in your customizing. For a correct price
    determination it is important that for example condition type PRS
    is in the first position, further the settings for the flag
    'Condition determined manually' should'nt be altered.
    Actually the standard schema looks like:
    4 0 PRS Total Price                       X 5
    5 1 PRS0 General Price Compon             X
    5 3 PRS1 Percentage of Wage               X
    5 5 PRS2 Overheads                        X
    5 7 PRS3 Misc Price Component             X
    13 0 KR01 Header Discount                 X
    14 0 KZ01 Header Surcharge                X
    Could you please change your schema and retest?.
    Best Regards,
    Arminda Jack

  • Excise value are not pick

    hi experts
    hi i have a problem  while doing billing document against sales order and outbound delievery excise values are not pick by the system.but in the sales order it is showing . please help to resolve this issue ..

    Dear Farhan,
        Just take a help of an SD consultant it is a matter of 2 min for him to solve this issue.
    still Go to tcode VTFL
    and search for your delivery type and your billing type and double click on the same,
    2.Then you will have an item folder on the left side click on that and you will get the list of all item category.
    3. Double click your item category YP05 and on the right side lower end you will get the Price type - in that enter "D" instead of "G"
    and Save it. then transport it to your quality and do the sales order process again.
    REgards,
    Sudhir

  • Simulation Loop: Code could not be generated correctly for this VI

    Running LabView Simulation 8.2 on Windows XP laptop.  I have a Simulation Loop that keeps generating the following error message:
    "Simulation Loop: Code could not be generated correctly for this VI"
    The only reference I can find in my searches is to using an RTX target, which does not apply.  When I click on Show Error it just highlights the Sim Loop
    Any ideas on how to debug this?

    Perhaps you can start removing things until you don't get the error any more. How big is the code in the loop?
    Mike...
    Certified Professional Instructor
    Certified LabVIEW Architect
    LabVIEW Champion
    "... after all, He's not a tame lion..."
    Be thinking ahead and mark your dance card for NI Week 2015 now: TS 6139 - Object Oriented First Steps

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to use RAID 0 on Qosmio x300-11w?

    Hi, I have a Qosmio x300-11w with 2 320GB HDD and I would like to use them in RAID 0 for a bit more speed, I cant see any RAID options in BIOS. Is there another way to enable it? My BIOS version up to date version 1-30 I think. Anyone know if it is p

  • XI RFC call inconsistent

    Hello All, I would appreciate some help in XI scenario I have which uses RFC to bring back a list of sales orders. When I run the RFC FM on R3 system I get 54 sales orders but in XI the RFC returns back 52 sales orders with the same criteria. Some ho

  • Image varinats

    Hi All, Can any one explain me use of Image variants?  What will be the file format when you use set variant?

  • Create Primary key on View?

    Hi Can we create a Primary or Unique key on a simple view? while actual table doesn't have any primary or unique key Regards, Nasir.

  • Creating F4 help

    Hi, I am updating one table(T1) through my program.Now I want to create the F4 entry for a selection screen of the same program by using the T1-field entries.Can anyone tell how to do it?