TDS base amount is double in certificate ?

Hi,
All Experts.
In TDS certificate my invoice amount is getting as double of posted invoice amount, However TDS calculation and amount
completely perfect in certificate .
Experts can any one tell where I am going wrong in configuration part.
We have total 4 194J , 194C , 194I , 194A sections for TDS out of 2 I & J are showing perfect output remaining 2 194A & 194 C
are problem some.
Your help is highly appreciable.
Regards,
Pankaj.
Edited by: pankaj_ab on Jul 25, 2009 11:38 AM
Edited by: pankaj_ab on Jul 25, 2009 3:12 PM

Hi,
SATYA.
We have done changes in ABAP program. Earlier we had using Z for same we swithced over to standard program
then made changes standard.
Our ABAPer added or changed the user exit function in it.
Regards,
Pankaj.
Are you also going through same problem ?

Similar Messages

  • TDS Base Amount

    Hi,
    Please anybody knows how the TDS base amount field
    is diplayed in TDS report i.e. tds amount, surcharge, edcess
    and from which field it should be picked from TDS tables?
    kumar

    Dear,
    System will look for field WT_QSSHH in table WITH_ITEM.
    Regards,
    Chintan Joshi.

  • Base Amount in table BSET is doubled when posted using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_PO

    Hi,
    We are using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST to post the document. We are using the Tax Code to determine the tax and are able to succesfully post the document.
    But when we click on Taxes button in overview screen of the posted document, BASE AMOUNT is doubled than the actual base amount given. But the tax is calculated only on actual Base Amount.
    Note that, when we post the document using FB01, we dont have any issues.
    Please help us in understanding what the problem is.
    Thanks,
    Phani

    Hi,
    if you called BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST., you should chak that RETURN table does not contain messages  of type E A or X and then call FM BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT.
    COMMIT WORK is triggered by IDoc inbound process if not user process calls ROLLBACK WORK. Sol I woinder whats is happening.
    Regards,
    Clemens

  • F-48 TDS on Base Amount Excluding Service Tax+Edu Cess+H.ecess (194J)

    Hi Expert,
    We want at the time Advance Payment against PO. thru T.Code F-48, when i go to give the amount after Deduct TDS 10% on Professional System calculate all three Item i.e Service Tax 10%, Educational Cess 2% on Service Tax, and Secondary & Higher secondary Cess 1% .
    The total Amount Rs. 1826/- Including Three Component Base amount Rs.1625/-.
    We want system Calculate on Base Amount i.e 1625 of 10% = 162.50, but system calculate on Gross total i.e Rs.1826 and Tax 182.60.
    Kindly Help me to simulate the Transaction.
    Kind regards
    Pranav Kr. Gupta
    SAP FICO Consultant

    Hello Pranav,
    Select radio button as Net amount instead of gross amount in mentioned customization.
    SPRO > Financial accouting New > Withholding tax > Extended withholdign tax > Calcualtion > Withholding tax type > Define withholding tax type for invoice. Double click on relavent TDS type & change gross as net and check impact,which we are using since notification annouced by Income tax department.
    Regards
    Mani Kumar

  • TDS cerfitcte  not splitting tax amount  and base amount  showing wrong

    Dear Friends,
    1.I am using 3 different tax code for basic ecess and secess . System caculating correct amount and posting the entries.
    but  in the certificate its not showing the amount with split . Its showing  total amount of  TDS.
    2. In tds certificate  in the column total amount credited its showing 3 times of base amount.
    Please suggest  me , how to over come with these issues.
    Jain

    Hi Raj,
    SAP recommends a series of tables to be maintained, if you are configuring Witholding Tax.
    Please find below the reply from SAP on tables to be maintained.
    If you have separate tax codes for Surcharges, J_1IEWT_SURC table
    should be maintained, by setting the checkbox checked, for the company
    code. Those tax codes should be available the J_1IEWTSURC table
    (use SM30 to maintain these values)
    2. If you have a combined tax code for surcharges, then the tax rates
    should be maintained in J_1IEWT_SURC1 table.
    Make sure that tax codes available in J_1IEWT_SURC1 table are not
    available in J_1IEWTSURC table and vice-versa.
    3. If you are using separate tax codes for Education cess, those tax
    codes should be maintained in the J_1IEWTECESS table and 'X' should be
    maintained for the company code in J_1IEWT_ECFLAG table.
    4. If you are using combined tax codes for Education cess, tax rates
    should be maintained in J_1IEWT_ECESS1 table.
    Make sure that the tax codes available in J_1IEWT_ECESS1 table are not
    maintained in J_1IEWTECESS table and vice-versa.
    Maintain these tables and check whether you get the correct figures in your TDS certificate.
    Regards,
    SAPFICO

  • TDS on Base Amount

    Hi Experts,
    I have a received Professional Invoice of Rs. 1826/-
    Since February 2014 slab rate has been changed after Budget , scenarios is earlier on Base amount like Rs. 1625 after that supplier charge 12, 2 and 1% they charge, it comes 1826/-G.total. to pay to Vendor.
    But Section 194J 10% deduct on Base amount i.e 1625/- but system pic on G.total 1826 n calculate on that i.e Rs. 182.60/-
    Now we want system calculate on Base Amount.
    Kindly help me where we have to change the settings for the same.
    Kind regards
    Pranav Kr. Gupta
    SAP FICO Consultant

    Hello Pranav,
    Select radio button as Net amount instead of gross amount in mentioned customization.
    SPRO > Financial accouting New > Withholding tax > Extended withholdign tax > Calcualtion > Withholding tax type > Define withholding tax type for invoice. Double click on relavent TDS type & change gross as net and check impact,which we are using since notification annouced by Income tax department.
    For doing advance payments > Do not consider service tax ,which will routed through invoice posting.
    Regards
    Mani Kumar

  • BSET-HWBAS Tax Base Amount is wrong / double

    Dear Experts,
    We have a scenario where in IDOC comes from External system to SAP for posting. We are using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST for doing the postings. I have nearly passed all the necessary parameters but still the Tax base amount in BSET is wrong. And it happens only for one tax code only.
    I have passed the GL Account details, Currency amount  and Tax amount details. For each tax line I am also filling the  the relevant item number i.e. BAPIACTX09-ITEMNO_TAX.
    Can you please suggest solution for this issue. I have tried to serach SAP notes + SDN post but could not get suitable solution.
    The current issue is as follows:
    40200001  AB      103,11- (i.e. 20% tax)
    75003000 VN       90,00-   (i.e. 10% tax)
    34000000 AB       20,62-   (i.e. tax calculated). Here I have entered only the tax items. The currency balance with other entries is zero.
    But when I have a look at Environment--> Tax Data then it shows Tax Base amount for "AB" as 206.22 (i.e. 1033.11 x 2). The tax base amount for VN is right as 90.
    Kindly advise.
    -Abhishek

    Solved by myself.
    Refer SAP Note 626235 for details. The Tax by-pass for BKPF-AWTYP was switched off. This customization is maintained in table TAX_APPLI.

  • Extended Withholding Tax ( Minimum/maximum Base Amount )  - with accumulati

    We are facing problem in posting of vendor Invoice. Actually we have implemented Minimum base amount ( Rs. 75000/- ) at withholding tax type level and accumulation at per year  in withholding tax type A1 ( for testing purpose ) and assign the same to a vendor.  We have booked some invoices up to RS. 75000/- system working fine, no WHT is deducted. But now we have received a another Invoice Rs. 5000/- and at the time of booking of invoice system giving an error message
    I have changed the error message to warning but itu2019s again showing the same error message.
    Actually the problem is system calculate the WHT from the beginning of the year to till date and the amount of Vendor invoice is less the than the amount of WHT but itu2019s legal requirement and we have to post the financial entry as mentioned below
    Fictitious figures
    Vendor Account           Dr.           Rs,       1500.00     ( Debit instead of credit )
    Expense Account            Dr.           Rs.      5000.00     ( Actual exp. Of Invoice )
    WHT Payable Account            Cr.           Rs.      6500.00     ( Total WHT from the beginning
    Please provide the any.
    SAP reply
    Dear Customer,
    We understand your requirement. But the standard SAP system does not support a scenario where an invoice amount in lower than the tax amount.
    This is not a localization specific requirement. The accumulation logic is a generic system behaviour and all countries use it. We cannot make any change in the standard in this regard and change the current system behaviour.
    Option to handle this in the system
    The only way this can be handled in the system is once the accumulation limit has been reached, use a separate tax type tax code with out accumulations.
    Though this is not the ideal solution, this is the best possible solution for your requirement.
    Accumulation is not localized for India and the standard solution vailable for all the countries is used by Indian customers too.
    SAP is currently not looking at any enhancements to this feature.
    Other than the option mentioned above, there is no other way of handling this in the system.
    Best Regards,
    Soumya
    If any one have any otehr solution please inform us.

    This cannot be possible for two reasons.
    1.  If you are not able to recover the amount from the Vendor, you'll have to bear it yourself which is a loss to the company.
    2.  Even if such a process is provided, you cannot alter the previous invoices and your EWT amount does not correspond to the invoice you account for.  SAP works in an assumption that Tax will be calculated as a % of base price and cannot exceed it.
    The only way to mitigate this is to decide whether a Vendor would require this exemption to be declared based on past experience and past amount of transactions in the beginning itself.  If it is unlikely, better do not declare the accumulation limit for them.  This will save you from incurring loss and reducing the risk for the company.  Start deducting right from the beginning.
    If you are not sure, instead of giving accumulation, you can declare exemption upto 75000.  In this case, SAP cannot check whether the Vendor has crossed the limit or not.  You'll have to manually check and pass a Debit note to that extent when he exceeds the limit.  Again, this does not evade the risk of loss for the company.  Also, you cannot do TDS post processing for this amount (like TDS Remittance challan, TDS Certificate etc).
    So, in my opinion, try and decide if the Vendor would require accumulation right in the beginning itself.  Even if not able to decide, you can still deduct the tax and issue a TDS certificate, which the Vendor can claim refund based on his transactions with you from the Income Tax in case he does not exceed the limit.  This will limit the risk of loss for the company.
    Ravi.

  • Unable to Change Withholding Tax Base Amount while creating Service AP Invoice through DI API?

    Dear All,
    I am trying to create Service AP Invoice through DI API.
    If I post the document without changing SAPPurchaseInvoice.WithholdingTaxData.TaxableAmount the dount ocument is created in SAP without any problem.
    But if I change amount in above field then DI API throws error Unbalanced Transaction.
    If I post same document in SAP with changed base amount it got posted in SAP without any Issue.
    Where I am doing wrong?
    please guide.
    Using:
    SAP B1 version 9 Patch Level 11
    Location : India.
    Thanks.

    Hi ,
    maybe you can find solution to these note 1812344
    1846344  - Overview Note for SAP Business One 8.82 PL12
    Symptom
    This SAP Note contains collective information related to upgrades to SAP Business One 8.82 Patch Level 12 (B1 8.82 PL12) from previous SAP Business One releases.
    In order to receive information about delivered patches via email or RSS, please use the upper right subscription options on http://service.sap.com/~sapidp/011000358700001458732008E
    Solution
    Patch installation options:
    SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 can be installed directly on previous patches of SAP Business One 8.82
    You can upgrade your SAP Business One to 8.82PL12 from all patches of the following versions:8.81; 8.8; 2007 A SP01; 2007 A SP00; 2007 B SP00; 2005 A SP01; 2005 B
    Patch content:
    SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 includes all corrections from previous patches for releases 8.82, 8.81, 8.8, 2007, and 2005.
    For details about the contained corrections, please see the SAP Notes listed in the References section.
    Notes: SAP Business One 8.82 PL12 contains B1if version 1.17.5
    Patch download:
    Open http://service.sap.com/sbo-swcenter -> SAP Business One Products -> Updates -> SAP Business One 8.8 -> SAP BUSINESS ONE 8.82 -> Comprised Software Component Versions -> SAP BUSINESS ONE 8.82 -> Win32 -> Downloads tab
    Header Data
    Released On
    02.05.2013 02:34:18  
    Release Status
    Released for Customer  
    Component
    SBO-BC-UPG Upgrade  
    Priority
      Recommendations/additional info  
    Category
      Upgrade information  
    References
    This document refers to:
      SAP Business One Notes
    1482452
    IN_Wrong tax amount was created for some items in the invoice with Excisable BOM item involves
    1650289
    Printing Inventory Posting List for huge amount of data
    1678528
    Withholding amount in the first row is zeroed.
    1754529
    Error Message When Running Pick and Pack Manager
    1756263
    Open Items List shuts down on out of memory
    1757641
    Year-end closing
    1757690
    SEPA File Formats - New Pain Versions
    1757898
    Incoming Bank File Format
    1757904
    Outgoing Bank File Format
    1762860
    Incorrect weight calculation when Automatic Availability Check is on
    1770690
    Pro Forma Invoice
    1776948
    Calendar columns are wrong when working with Group View
    1780460
    OINM column description is not translated
    1780486
    UI_System crash when you set extreme value of double type to DataTable column
    1788256
    Incorrect User-Defined Field displayed in a Stock Transfer Request
    1788372
    ZH: 'Unacceptable Field' when export document to word
    1788818
    RU loc: No freight in the Tax Invoice layout
    1790404
    Cash Flow Inconsistency when Canceling Payment
    1791295
    B1info property of UI API AddonsInstaller object returns NULL value
    1791416
    Adding a new item to BoM is slow
    1794111
    Text is overlapping in specific localization
    1795595
    Change log for item group shows current system date in all the "Created" fields
    1797292
    Queries in alerts should support more query results
    1800055
    B1if_ Line break issue in inbound retrieval using JDBC
    1802580
    Add Journal Voucher to General Ledger report
    1803586
    Not realized payment is exported via Payment Engine using 'SAPBPDEOPBT_DTAUS' file format
    1803751
    Period indicator of document series can be changed although it has been used
    1804340
    LOC_BR_Cannot update Nota Fiscal Model
    1805554
    G/L Account displayed in a wrong position when unticking the checkbox "Account with Balance of Zero"
    1806576
    Payment Cannot Be Reconciled Internally
    1807611
    Cannot update UDF in Distribution Rule used in transactions
    1807654
    Serial No./Batch inconsistency by canceled Inventory Transfer
    1808694
    BR: Business Partner Code cannot be updated with CNPJ CPF error
    1809398
    CR_Cannot Display Related Multi-Value Parameters
    1809758
    Arrow key not work for Batch/Serial Number Transactions Report
    1810099
    Tax Amount is Recalculated Even if Tax Code Is Not Changed
    1811270
    Upgrade fails on Serial And Batches object with error code -10
    1811846
    Cannot run Exchange Rate Differences when multi branch is activated
    1812344
    Withholding Tax Amount Is Not Updated in Payment Once Witholding Tax Code Is Changed in Document through DI API
    1812740
    DI:"Operation Code" show wrong value when add "A/P Tax Invoice" based on "A/P Invoice"
    1813029
    US_Vendor address on 1099 Summary by Form/Box Report is not updated according to the latest Invoice
    1813835
    Wrong amounts of Goods Return in Open Item List
    1814207
    Preliminary page prints setting does not keep after upgrade
    1814860
    Value "Zero" cannot be imported to "Minimum Inventory Level" field via Excel file
    1815535
    RFQ: Web front end not displayed in supplier language
    1815810
    GT: Adding Incoming Payment for Some Cash Flow Relevant Accounts Fails
    1816191
    BR:System Crashes While Working with Tax Code Determination Window
    1816611
    CR_Crystal Report Displayed Incorrectly Afte

  • Error:withholding tax base amount exceeds the amount of customer/vendor lin

    Dear Team,
    I am encountering an issue while doing f-48.I am providing you brief explanation below:
    There are two different down payment request has been made against two difference P.Ou2019s.
    1. Down payment amount for P.O No. 3600011383 is Rs. 581235/- and
    2. Another Down Payment for P.O No. 3600011395 is Rs. 1162470/-
    Now we want to deduct the TDS against Sl No. 1 is Rs. 21,50,570 ( i.e., Rs. 581235+1569335 (P.O No. 3600011383
    Simply, TDS Deduction are as follows :
    Sl No. 1      Withholding Base amount should be 2150570/- instead of 581235/- and 
    SL No. 2     Withholding Base amount should be Rs. 1162470/-.
    Plz do the need

    Hi Rajeswari ,
    The amount is mentioned as the base amount in PO.At the time of Downpayment they want to change the base amount instead of 581235 the user want to give the base amount 21,50,570  the mentioned like.But system is showing the message like the above .Plz let me know.
    Regards,
    Suma.

  • Tax Base Amount calculated wrongly

    Dear Friends,
    While posting a MIRO with a manually enter tax base amount, the amount doubles whenever I click on another tab like basic data and come back to tac base amount.
    For e.g. I have a PO for 10000, now I am posting an invoice for the same but I have to pay only 9000 to the vendor because 1000 has been deducted as a penalty for late delivery.
    Now I enter a MIRO, with reference to the purchase order and enter 9000 in the line item and trying to enter 10000 in the field Tax Base amount under the Tax tab.
    Now whenever I change tabs, i.e if I go to Basic data and come back to Tax Tab, the amount has been changed to 19000. If change tabs again, it changes to 28000 and so on...
    Not sure if this is a bug or has anyone faced this issue? Can anyone suggest a note or a solution...
    Thanks,
    Hari Dharen

    Thank you Mani Kumar,
    But that's what we already have in customizing:
    The problem is that during Invoice Verification (MIRO) we specified that only one of the items is eligible to Cash Discount (we set for item #2 that it is W/o Cash Discount):
    The invoice is posting correctly identifying the correct disc. amount of 1,500 (50,000*3%):
    The problem is during the Payment Run where the system determines a Cash Discount that applies but when calculating the W/Tax Base Amount it do the following:
    51,000*3% = 1,530
    W/Tax Base = 51,000 - 1,530 = 49,470 usd
    F110 Proposal generated:
    It is false that the Cash Discount applies to all items, the expected result should be:
    (only eligible items for Cash Discount) 50,000*3% = 1,500
    W/Tax Base = 51,000 - 1,500 = 49,500 usd not 49,470
    Thanks

  • Excise base amount for Import PO in MIGO

    Dear All,
    I have create the Import Po and maintain all conditions i.e.JCDB,JCV1,JECV,J1CV,JEDB,JSDB,JADC and assign the custom vendor to conditions and make the custom payment through MIRO for planned delivery cost.
    Then while doing the MIGO with referance to PO and commercial invoice,all duties are captyring correctly but excise base amount is showing base amount plus basic custom duty.Please give the solution is any setting missing in costomizing.
    And in MIGO item screen BED %(CVD%) is not showing but AED,ECSS,SECESS is showing correctly.
    Please give solution urgently.
    Regards,
    Vinay

    hi
    check following configuration
    path: spro>logistic general >tax on goods movements>India >basic settings>determination of excise duty >maintain excise defaults >
    if it is been done then check whole config as follows
    TOTAL IMPORT CONFIGURATION AND CYCLE
    in ur pricing u have to create following
    JCDB IN: Basic Custom Duty
    JCV1 IN : CVD
    JECV IN : Ed Cess on CVD
    J1CV IN : H&SECess on CVD
    JEDB IN : Ed Cess on BCD
    JSDB IN : H&SECess on BCD
    JADC Additional Duty of Custom
    JCV1, JECV, J1CV and JADC will go to Excise MODVAT Accounts and JCDB, JEDB and JSDB will get loaded on inventory.
    In M/06, for all above conditions, keep following controls;
    Cond. class A (Discount or surcharge) Plus/minus A (Positive)
    Calculat.type A (Percentage)
    Cond.category B (Delivery costs)
    Activate "Currency Conversion" and "Accrual"
    Now for setoff
    maintain the following conditions in excise default settings.
    JCV1, JECV, JADC
    path: spro>logistic general >tax on goods movements>India >basic settings>determination of excise duty >maintain excise defaults >
    along with ur tax procedure maintain these conditions in the specified fields
    JCV1 in CVD condition field.
    JECV in ECS condition field.
    JADC in ACD condition field.
    in case of SECess on CVD, no need to maintain.
    it is hardcode in the standard
    Vendor in GR 2 (Entry always possible)
    Import scenario
    1.Create material master of import goods.
    2. Create vendor master record of import vendor and Customs clearing vendor.
    3. Maintain CIN settings.
    4. Maintain J1id.
    5. Maintain Pricing procedure SAP standard JIMPOR.., maintain required conditions..JCDB, JCV1...
    6.Assign the schema to respective import vendor in purchasing view of VMR.
    7. Create import PO, check in conditions of JCDB, JCV1 the customs clearing vendor(Indian vendor) and percentage is assigned. This can be done by In condition tab select condtion then click on display, then enter.
    Save the PO.
    8. MIRO --Capture Bill Of Entry.(Commercial Invoice No.,).Customs clearing first .Here CVD will b converted to BED.
    9. Capture Excises invoice--j1iex.
    10.MIGO.
    12.Post Excise Invoice.
    13.MIRO...Payment to vendor(import vendor)

  • Excise Base amount not updated in J_1iexcdtl table -reg

    Dear Gurus,
    We have used SAP Ecc 5.0 Patch level 21. In patch level 20, SAP admit without delivery , can do commercial billing and excise billing in foreground. After batch update SAP not support excise invoice creation in foreground. It support only background. We have 2 senario. 1 is capex sales . ie. without material stock we have raise the comm.billing and excise billing. 2 is supplimentary billing. both the senario now getting effected because of no delivery. Asper SAP advise we have setting for background process excise invoice creation. Excise invoice created. but excise base amount not updated in j_1iexcdtl table. Using J_1I7_USEREXIT_CALC_EXC_BASE user exit we are trying to update the same. For single material it works fine. But more than one material for the first material's base amount is updated in all materials. for your reference i have mentioned the codding . SAP advise it is possible to update excise base amount. But not possible to do. pl.adivse if any correct or guide to solve it.
    FUNCTION J_1I7_USEREXIT_CALC_EXC_BASE.
    ""Local Interface:
    *"  IMPORTING
    *"     VALUE(EXCITM_BASE) TYPE  KOMV-KAWRT
    *"     VALUE(POSNR) TYPE  VBRP-POSNR
    *"  EXPORTING
    *"     VALUE(EXCITM_BASE) TYPE  KOMV-KAWRT
    *"  TABLES
    *"      KONV STRUCTURE  KONV
    *{   INSERT         RDSK925285                                        1
    TABLES : KONV.
    data :   W_INDEX LIKE SY-TABIX.
    DATA :ITAB LIKE TABLE OF KONV WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA :ITAB1 LIKE TABLE OF KOmV WITH HEADER LINE.
    ITAB1[] = KONV[].
    DATA : BEGIN OF I_TAB OCCURS 0,
           KAWRT LIKE KONV-KAWRT,
           POSNR LIKE VBRP-POSNR,
           END OF I_TAB.
    LOOP AT ITAB1.
    READ TABLE ITAB1 WITH KEY KSCHL = 'JMOD' KPOSN = ITAB1-KPOSN.
    IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
        EXCITM_BASE = ITAB1-KAWRT.
        POSNR = ITAB1-KPOSN.
    ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.
    *}   INSERT
    ENDFUNCTION.
    Thanks & Regards
    R.Udayakumar

    solved with the same user exit

  • Excise Duty Base Amount J_1IEXCDTL

    Hi All,
    After Creation of Excise Invoice the Field " Excise Duty Base Amount " is not getting updated , can any one give some idea on this
    Thanks In advance
    Siva

    Hi,
    Kindly ensure that in your SD Pricing procedure the condition type which
    has the Assesable value has been defined with Condition category 'H'
    through the transaction V/06, it is also expected to be non statistical
    in your pricing procedure. If it is statistical then refer the SAP
    note 1003634 which has the user exit J_1I7_USEREXIT_CALC_EXC_BASE. This
    user exit has the KON strcuture of your billing, you can derevive the
    base value and pass it to the parameter EXCITM_BASE so that the excise
    base can be updated during billing. This has to implemented through
    SE37 transaction.
    Please note that the old documents can not be resolved with the above
    solution, you will have to write your own ABAP code and update the base
    price in the table J_1iexcdtl for the excise invoice created when you
    transfer the goods from factory.
    Regards,
    Murali

  • Excise Duty Base Amount not flowing into ARE -1

    Dear Friends,
    While Iam creating ARE-1 for the Exports Excise Invoice - Excise Duty Base Amount not flowing into ARE1
    thanks
    Sasi

    Dear Lakshmipathi,
    Earlier Liable to AT1 is ticked but not Indicator NCCD,I have checked after ticking the NCCD as well....
    In my pricing procedure i dont have the NCCD condition .....as its not required.
    In classify consditiontypes: I have maintained PR00 condition type as well along with Excise condition types...Do i need to maintain this PR00 anywhere else
    or
    Is there anything I need to do with the assesable value.......if so how should be the entry like in the pricing procedure?
    Can someone please provide me the solution...its very urgent
    Thanks
    Sasi

Maybe you are looking for