Temp Folder Bulging

The "temp" folder is the 800 pound gorilla of Captivate that
keeps growing every time I create a new project. I've used
Captivate extensively since I had it installed last spring, and the
temp folder, located within "Local Settings" within the "Documents
and Settings" heirarchy of my Windows 2000 computer, now totals 8
gigabytes in size!
I take care to store my Captivate projects in project folders
and keep all my resources pertinent to the project within each
folder, and this "temp" folder thing is vexing as it is consuming
more and more hard drive space.
But I'm afraid to dump all this temp stuff because I'm unsure
of the consequences if I do.
Can anyone give me some sound advice?
Thanks,
Glen Gummess
Instructional Designer
University of St. Francis
Joliet, IL

Hi Glen
I've always considered the Temp folder to be just that. As a
result, I've regularly scrubbed it squeaky clean and haven't
noticed any ill consequences as a result.
Cheers... Rick

Similar Messages

Multiple plugtmp-1 plugtmp-2 etc. in local\temp folder stay , crossdomain.xml and other files containing visited websitenames created while private browsing

OS = Windows 7
When I visit a site like youtube whith private browsing enabled and with the add-on named "shockwave flash" in firefox add-on list installed and activate the flashplayer by going to a video the following files are created in the folder C:\Users\MyUserName\AppData\Local\Temp\plugtmp-1
plugin-crossdomain.xml
plugin-strings-nl_NL-vflLqJ7vu.xlb
The contents of plugin-crossdomain contain both the "youtube.com" adress as "s.ytimg.com" and is as follows:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE cross-domain-policy SYSTEM "http://www.macromedia.com/xml/dtds/cross-domain-policy.dtd">
-<cross-domain-policy> <allow-access-from domain="s.ytimg.com"/> <allow-access-from domain="*.youtube.com"/> </cross-domain-policy>
The contents of the other file I will spare you cause I think those are less common when I visit other sites but I certainly don't trust the file. The crossdomain.xml I see when I visit most other flashpayer sites as well.
I've also noticed multiple plugin-crossdomain-1.xml and onwards in numbers, I just clicked a youtube video to test, got 6 of them in my temp plus a file named "plugin-read2" (no more NL file cause I changed my country, don't know how youtube knows where I'm from, but that's another subject, don't like that either). I just noticed one with a different code:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
-<cross-domain-policy> <allow-access-from domain="*"/> </cross-domain-policy>
So I guess this one comprimises my browsing history a bit less since it doesn't contain a webadress. If these files are even meant to be deposited in my local\temp folder. The bigger problem occurs when they stay there even after using private browsing, after clearing history, after clearing internet temporary files, cache, whatever you can think of. Which they do in my case, got more than 50 plugtmp-# folders in the previous mentioned local\temp folder containing all website names I visited in the last months. There are a variety of files in them, mostly ASP and XML, some just say file. I have yet to witness such a duplicate folder creation since I started checking my temp (perhaps when firefox crashes? I'd say I've had about 50 crashes in recent months).
I started checking my temp because of the following Microsoft Security Essential warnings I received on 23-4-12:
Exploit:Java/CVE-2010-0840.HE
containerfile:C:\Users\Username\AppData\Local\Temp\jar_cache2196625541034777730.tmp
file:C:\Users\Username\AppData\Local\Temp\jar_cache2196625541034777730.tmp->pong/reversi.class
and...
Exploit:Java/CVE-2008-5353.ZT
containerfile:C:\Users\Noname\AppData\Local\Temp\jar_cache1028270176376464057.tmp
file:C:\Users\Noname\AppData\Local\Temp\jar_cache1028270176376464057.tmp->Testability.class
Microsoft Security Essentials informed me that these files were quarantained and deleted but when going to my temp file they were still there, I deleted them manually and began the great quest of finding out what the multiple gigabytes of other files and folders were doing in that temp folder and not being deleted with the usual clearing options within firefox (and IE).
Note that I have set my adobe flasplayer settings to the most private intense I could think of while doing these tests (don't allow data storage for all websites, disable peer-to peer stuff, don't remember exactly anymore, etc.). I found it highly suspicious that i needed to change these settings online on an adobe website, is that correct? When right-clicking a video only limited privacy options are available which is why I tried the website thing.
After the inital discovery of the java exploit (which was discovered by MSE shortly after I installed and started my first scan with Malwarebytes, which in turn made me suspicious whether I had even downloaded the right malwarebytes, but no indication in the filename if I google it). Malwarebytes found nothing, MSE found nothing after it said it removed the files, yet it didn't remove them, manually scanning these jar_cache files with both malwarevytes and MSE resulted in nothing. Just to be sure, I deleted them anyways like I said earlier. No new jar_cache files have been created, no exploits detected since then. CCleaner has cleaned most of my temp folder, I did the rest, am blocking all cookies (except for now shortly), noscript add-on has been running a while on my firefox (V 3.6.26) to block most javascripts except from sites like youtube. I've had almost the same problem using similar manual solutions a couple of months ago, and a couple of months before that (clearing all the multiple tmp folders, removing or renaming jar_cache manually, running various antmalware software, full scan not finding a thing afterwards, installing extra add-ons to increase my security, this time it's BetterPrivacy which I found through a mozilla firefox https connection, I hope, which showed me nicely how adobe flash was still storing LSO's even after setting all storage settings to 0 kb and such on the adobe website, enabling private browsing in firefox crushed those little trolls, but still plugtmp trolls are being created, help me crush them please, they confuse me when I'm looking for a real threat but I still want to use flash, IE doesn't need those folders and files, or does it store them somewhere else?).
I'm sorry for the long story and many questions, hope it doesn't scare you away from helping me fight this. I suspect it's people wanting to belong to the hackergroup Anonymous who are doing this to my system and repeating their tricks (or the virus is still there, but I've done many antivirus scans with different programs so no need to suggest that option to me, they don't find it or I run into it after a while again, so far, have not seen jar_cache show up). Obviously, you may focus on the questions pertaining firefox and plugtmp folders, but if you can help me with any information regarding those exploits I would be extremely grateful, I've read alot but there isn't much specific information for checking where it comes from when all the anti-virus scanners don't detect anything anymore and don't block it incoming. I also have downloaded and installed process monitor but it crashes when I try to run it. The first time I tried to run it it lasted the longest, now it crashes after a few seconds, I just saw the number of events run up to almost a million and lots of cpu usage. When it crashed everything returned back to normal, or at least that's what I'm supposed to think I guess. I'll follow up on that one on their forum, but you can tell me if the program is ligit or not (it has a microsoft digital signature, or the name micosoft is used in that signature).

update:
I haven't upgraded my firefox yet because of a "TVU Web Player" plugin that isn't supported in the new firefox and I'm using it occasionally, couldn't find an upgrade for it. Most of my other plugins are upgraded in the green (according to mozilla websitechecker):
Java(TM) Platform SE 6 U31 (green)
Shockwave for Director (green - from Adobe I think)
Shockwave Flash (green - why do I even need 2 of these adobe add-ons? can I remove one? I removed everything else i could find except the reader i think, I found AdobeARM and Adobe Acrobat several versions, very confusing with names constantly switching around)
Java Deployment Toolkit 6.0.310.5 (green, grrr, again a second java, why do they do this stuff, to annoy people who are plagued with java and flash exploits? make it more complicating?)
Adobe Acrobat (green, great, it's still there, well I guess this is the reader then)
TVU Web Player for FireFox (grey - mentioned it already)
Silverlight Plug-In (yellow - hardly use it, I think, unless it's automatic without my knowing, perhaps I watched one stream with it once, I'd like to remove it, but just in case I need it, don't remember why I didn't update, perhaps a conflict, perhaps because I don't use it, or it didn't report a threat like java and doesn't create unwantend and history compromising temp files)
Google Update (grey - can I remove? what will i lose? don't remember installing it, and if I didn't, why didn't firefox block it?)
Veetle TV Core (grey)
Veetle TV Player (grey - using this for watching streams on veetle.com, probably needs the Core, deleted the broadcaster that was there earlier, never chose to install that, can't firefox regulate that when installing different components? or did i just miss that option and assumed I needed when I was installing veetle add-on?)
Well, that's the list i get when checking on your site, when i use my own browseroptions to check add-ons I get a slightly different and longer list including a few I have already turned off (which also doesn't seem very secure to me, what's the point in using your site then for anything other than updates?), here are the differences in MY list:
I can see 2 versions of Java(TM) Platform SE 6 U31, (thanks firefox for not being able to copy-paste this)
one "Classic Java plug-in for Netscape and Mozilla"
the other is "next generation plug-in for Mozilla browsers".
I think I'll just turn off the Netscape and Mozilla one, don't trust it, why would I need 2? There I did it, no crashes, screw java :P
There's also a Mozilla Default plugin listed there, why does firefox list it there without any further information whether I need it or not or whether it really originates from Mozilla firefox? It doesn't even show up when I use your website plugin checker, so is there no easy way by watching this list for me to determin I can skip worrying about it?
There's also some old ones that I recently deactivated still listed like windows live photo gallery, never remember adding that one either or needing it for anything and as usual, right-clicking and "visit homepage" is greyed out, just as it is for the many java crap add-ons I encountered so far.
Doing a quick check, the only homepage I can visit is the veetle one. The rest are greyed out. I also have several "Java Console" in my extentions tab, I deactivated all but the one with the highest number. Still no Java Console visible though, even after going to start/search "java", clicking java file and changing the settings there to "show" console instead of "hide" (can't remember exact details).
There's some other extentions from noscript, TVU webplayer again, ADblock Plus and now also BetterPrivacy (sidenote, a default.LSO remains after cleanup correct? How do I know that one isn't doing anything nasty if it's code has been changed or is being changed? To prevent other LSO's I need to use both private browsing and change all kinds of restrictions online for adobe flashplayer, can anyone say absurd!!! if you think you're infected and want to improve your security? Sorry that rant was against Adobe, but it's really against Anonymous, no offense).

Firefox 15.1 storing Downloads in Temp folder despite being set to save into Downloads?

OK so I'm running Windows 7 64 Bit and Mozilla Firefox 15.1
Downloads is set to save to "Downloads" but, they are in fact saving to a firefox temp folder?
checked the about:config and browser.download = C:\...\Downloads
I read an answer on here that said "Disable Real Time AV Scanning??? are you serious? all those hackers out there and you want me to turn off my AV?
Please can you provide a suitable answer to this query.

If the anti-virus software is scanning the file while it is still in the temp folder and keeps an handle on it then Firefox won't be able to move the file from the temp folder to the destination folder.<br />
Your AV software should still scan the file if you try to start it or open the file in another application if real-time scanning is disabled.<br />
You can also try to exclude the temp folder, so the scanning will be done once Firefox moves the file to the destination folder and not during the download phase.

PDF files have suddenly started downloading to the temp folder instead of the download folder where they used to be-- the downloads folder is marked correctly

all downloads are set to go to downloads file-- PDFs have quit going there and are in temp folder instead-- all other downloads are still going to the right place

Deleting the '''mimeTypes.rdf''' will reset all download actions to the default settings.
Type '''about:support''' in the address bar and press enter.
Under the page logo on the left side you will see '''Application Basics.'''
Under this find '''Profile Folder.''' To it’s right press the button
'''Show Folder.''' This will open your file browser to the current
Firefox profile. Now '''Close Firefox.'''
Locate the file. Then rename or delete it. Restart Firefox.

Downloads going to The "Temp" Folder

Hi! I've had this problem for a while now and now i want to fix it. I see other people have this problem too. When i download a file and open it dircetl, its saves in the Temp folder on my C drive(witch is an SSD) I don't want it there and i have not asked them to go there, I want it on my 2nd harddrive, Witch is where i got it set up to go. Is there any way to get files you open directly to go to the folder that you set? or is this impossible?
Troubleshooting Information Included.

Firefox immediately starts downloading the file in the background and saves the file to the temp folder and doesn't wait until you specify the name and the location (destination folder).
If the file stays in the temp folder then it is possible that your security software is blocking the file and prevents Firefox from moving the file to the specified destination folder.
You would have to change the TMP and TEMP environment variables to point to a location (X:\\temp) on that other drive.

To delete clean up software which removes file from temp folder

when i pause a download and switch off the system and resume it after 2 or more days an error c:\Documents and settings\ ....etc couldn't save the file appears. Some one replied me in this forum that i may 've cleanup software which has deleted the file in temp folder. How to detect and delete this cleanup software if i have it ? i don't know if i've this because i haven't seen it in my program list. i'm using windows xp.
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened

when i pause a download and switch off the system and resume it after 2 or more days an error c:\Documents and settings\ ....etc couldn't save the file appears. Some one replied me in this forum that i may 've cleanup software which has deleted the file in temp folder. How to detect and delete this cleanup software if i have it ? i don't know if i've this because i haven't seen it in my program list. i'm using windows xp.
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened

Safe to delete content from the Temp folder under AppData?

Hi everyone,
Is it safe to delete the contents from the Temp folder (C:\Windows\ServiceProfiles\LocalService\AppData\Local\Temp) in the SharePoint 2013 web front end servers?
For some reason I see around 30 GB of temp files. Came across
this blog post but in my case ULS logs are still being generated in the D drive. Not sure how those Temp files are being created. Application servers seem to be fine.
Tried -
changing the ULS log path from D to C and back to D drive (as per the above blog post... no luck)
tried restarting the SP tracing service
Any suggestions would be appreciated!
BlueSky2010
Please help and appreciate others by using forum features: "Propose As Answer", "Vote As Helpful" and
"Mark As Answer"

Hi,
Thanks for the sharing and have a good day.
Regards,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected] .
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

Office Interop 32 bit on 64 bit OS email attachments filling up outlook temp folder OLK

I have an issue when sending emails (many) using Office.Interop 32 bit that when the application is installed on a 64 bit OS the outlook secure temp is filling up and throwing an exception, this does not occur when the application is installed on a 32 bit
OS.
.NET framework 4.0
Visual Studio 2010 (C#)
Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook 14.0.0.0 Runtime v2.0.50727
for (int i = 0; i < 300; i++)
Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.Application outlookApplication = new Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.Application();
Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook._MailItem oMailItem = (Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook._MailItem)outlookApplication.CreateItem(Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.OlItemType.olMailItem);
oMailItem.Recipients.Add("[email protected]").Type = 1;
oMailItem.Subject = "test email";
oMailItem.BodyFormat = OlBodyFormat.olFormatHTML;
oMailItem.Save();
oMailItem.Attachments.Add(@"C:\test_doc_1.docx", (int)Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.OlAttachmentType.olByValue, Type.Missing, Type.Missing);
oMailItem.Attachments.Add(@"C:\test_doc_2.docx", (int)Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.OlAttachmentType.olByValue, Type.Missing, Type.Missing);
oMailItem.Send();
Win7 32bit with Outlook 2010 32bit -> Works on this setup
Win7 64bit with Outlook 2010 32bit -> Does not work on this set up
Problem:
Sending many emails with the same attachment fills the outlook secure temp folder
C:\Users\[User]\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\ZT7WMFGK\
(with a temp copy of the attachment) these files are not removed on Win7 64bit so at about 200 emails the exception is thrown:
"Cannot create file [file name]. Right-click the folder you want to create the file in, and then click Properties on the shortcut menu to check your permissions for the folder."
On Win7 32bit i can see the files getting automatically deleted from the secure temp folder so there is no problem
Im not sure where to start with this.

Seems that you have to release the objects explicitly. According to articles (http://www.bing.com/search?q=c%23%20release%20com%20objects), try this:
Application outlookApplication =
new
Application();
_MailItem oMailItem = (_MailItem)outlookApplication.CreateItem(
OlItemType.olMailItem );
var recipients = oMailItem.Recipients;
var recipient = recipients.Add(
recipient.Type =
1;
oMailItem.Subject =
"test email";
oMailItem.BodyFormat =
OlBodyFormat.olFormatHTML;
oMailItem.Save();
var attachments = oMailItem.Attachments;
var attachment1 = attachments.Add(
@". . . .", (int)OlAttachmentType.olByValue,
Type.Missing,
Type.Missing );
var attachment2 = attachments.Add(
@". . . .", (int)OlAttachmentType.olByValue,
Type.Missing,
Type.Missing );
oMailItem.Send();
Marshal.ReleaseComObject( attachment2
Marshal.ReleaseComObject( attachment1
Marshal.ReleaseComObject( attachments
Marshal.ReleaseComObject( recipient );
Marshal.ReleaseComObject( recipients
Marshal.ReleaseComObject( oMailItem );
Marshal.ReleaseComObject( outlookApplication
Check (with Debugger) that the files are removed at the end of this fragment.
Also consider creating a single outlookApplication before the loop.

Temp folder was not set for RTFStringbuffer Error

Hi,
We are using CR XI 11.0.0.895 and CR XI JRC is been used to generate the reports in PDF and RTF format.
While generating report of more than 1000 pages in RTF format throws the below mentioned exception
temp folder was not set for RTFStringbuffer
However, Generating reports in PDF format generates the report.
Find below the environment details which would helpful for the analysis.
CR XI 11.0.0.895
IE 6.0
MS-office 2003
Windows XP SP2
Reports JRC application deployed on Weblogic 8.1.4
Please suggest us a solution for this problem.
Thanks in advance.

If you run [Process Monitor|http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896645.aspx], do you see any file access errors when the JRC tries creating a temp RTF file?
I think I've recommended this before, but have you tried the newest version of the JRC?
[https://boc.sdn.sap.com/node/19020]
The XI Release 1 keycode will work with it.
Sincerely,
Ted Ueda

VS2013 Installation failed - The Temp folder is on a drive that is full or is inaccessible

When I trying to install Visual Studio 2013 Premium either from .ISO or web installer, installation fails on installing Microsoft
Visual C++ 2013 x86 Minimum Runtime - 12.0.21005 with error:
The Temp folder is on a drive that is full or is inaccessible. Free up space on the drive or verify that you have write permission on the Temp folder.
But there are enought free space on system drive (36GB) and current user (local admin) and administrator has full access to C:\Windows\Temp and %USERPROFILE%\AppData\Local\Temp folders. "Run as Administrator" has no effect.
OS: Windows 8 Enterprise x64
Part of Log file with error:
[0F28:0408][2015-03-22T11:44:14]i338: Acquiring package: vcRuntimeMinimum_x64, payload: cab5046A8AB272BF37297BB7928664C9503, download from: bits://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=429684&clcid=0x409
[13C8:0F18][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i305: Verified acquired payload: cab5046A8AB272BF37297BB7928664C9503 at path: C:\ProgramData\Package Cache\.unverified\cab5046A8AB272BF37297BB7928664C9503, moving to: C:\ProgramData\Package Cache\{A749D8E6-B613-3BE3-8F5F-045C84EBA29B}v12.0.21005\packages\vcRuntimeMinimum_amd64\cab1.cab.
[0F28:0408][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i000: MUX: Source confirmed
[0F28:0408][2015-03-22T11:44:16]w343: Prompt for source of package: VCRedistD11x86, payload: VCRedistD11x86, path: D:\Soft\packages\vcRedistD11\1033\vcredist_x86.exe
[0F28:0408][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i000: MUX: Next Source: Web, Attempted: 1, Limit:3
[0F28:11A4][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i000: MUX: ExecutePackageBegin PackageId: vcRuntimeMinimum_x64
[0F28:0408][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i000: MUX: Source retrieved: Web
[0F28:0408][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i000: MUX: Package:VCRedistD11x86, PayloadId:VCRedistD11x86 Url: bits://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=429663&clcid=0x409, Attempting count: 1
[0F28:0408][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i000: MUX: Existing last unconfirmed source: Web
[0F28:0408][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i338: Acquiring package: VCRedistD11x86, payload: VCRedistD11x86, download from: bits://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=429663&clcid=0x409
[13C8:0C8C][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i301: Applying execute package: vcRuntimeMinimum_x64, action: Install, path: C:\ProgramData\Package Cache\{A749D8E6-B613-3BE3-8F5F-045C84EBA29B}v12.0.21005\packages\vcRuntimeMinimum_amd64\vc_runtimeMinimum_x64.msi, arguments:
' MSIFASTINSTALL="7" NOVSUI="1"'
[13C8:0C8C][2015-03-22T11:44:16]e000: Error 0x80070660: Failed to install MSI package.
[13C8:0C8C][2015-03-22T11:44:16]e000: Error 0x80070660: Failed to execute MSI package.
[0F28:11A4][2015-03-22T11:44:16]e000: Error 0x80070660: Failed to configure per-machine MSI package.
[0F28:11A4][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i000: MUX: Installation size in bytes for package: vcRuntimeMinimum_x64 MaxAppDrive: 0 MaxSysDrive: 8192 AppDrive: 0 SysDrive: 8192
[0F28:11A4][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i000: MUX: Return Code:0x80070660 Msi Messages:0 Result Detail:0 Restart:None
[0F28:11A4][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i000: MUX: Set Result: Return Code=-2147023264 (0x80070660), Error Message=, Result Detail=, Vital=True, Package Action=Install, Package Id=vcRuntimeMinimum_x64
[0F28:11A4][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i319: Applied execute package: vcRuntimeMinimum_x64, result: 0x80070660, restart: None
[0F28:11A4][2015-03-22T11:44:16]e000: Error 0x80070660: Failed to execute MSI package.
[0F28:11A4][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i000: MUX: ExecutePackageBegin PackageId: vcRuntimeMinimum_x64
[13C8:0C8C][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i318: Skipped rollback of package: vcRuntimeMinimum_x64, action: Uninstall, already: Absent
[0F28:11A4][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i000: MUX: Installation size in bytes for package: vcRuntimeMinimum_x64 MaxAppDrive: 0 MaxSysDrive: 0 AppDrive: 0 SysDrive: 0
[0F28:11A4][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i000: MUX: Return Code:0x0 Msi Messages:0 Result Detail:0 Restart:None
[0F28:11A4][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i000: MUX: Reset execution Result
[0F28:11A4][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i000: MUX: Reset Result
[0F28:11A4][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i319: Applied rollback package: vcRuntimeMinimum_x64, result: 0x0, restart: None
[13C8:0C8C][2015-03-22T11:44:16]i351: Removing cached package: vcRuntimeMinimum_x64, from path: C:\ProgramData\Package Cache\{A749D8E6-B613-3BE3-8F5F-045C84EBA29B}v12.0.21005\
[0F28:162C][2015-03-22T11:44:17]e000: Error 0x80070642: UX aborted on download progress.
[0F28:162C][2015-03-22T11:44:17]e000: Error 0x80070642: Failed to send progress from BITS job.
[0F28:162C][2015-03-22T11:44:17]e000: Error 0x80070642: Failure while sending progress during BITS job modification.
[0F28:0408][2015-03-22T11:44:17]e000: Error 0x80070642: Failed attempt to download URL: 'bits://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=429663&clcid=0x409' to: 'C:\Users\GUK_MI~1.AXM\AppData\Local\Temp\{fec93b6d-17f6-4952-96e1-2af5a525cf5d}\VCRedistD11x86'
[0F28:0408][2015-03-22T11:44:17]i000: MUX: Set Result: Return Code=-2147023294 (0x80070642), Error Message=, Result Detail=, Vital=False, Package Action=Download_Bits, Package Id=VCRedistD11x86
[0F28:0408][2015-03-22T11:44:17]e000: Error 0x80070642: Failed to acquire payload from: 'bits://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=429663&clcid=0x409' to working path: 'C:\Users\GUK_MI~1.AXM\AppData\Local\Temp\{fec93b6d-17f6-4952-96e1-2af5a525cf5d}\VCRedistD11x86'
[0F28:0408][2015-03-22T11:44:17]e313: Failed to acquire payload: VCRedistD11x86 to working path: C:\Users\GUK_MI~1.AXM\AppData\Local\Temp\{fec93b6d-17f6-4952-96e1-2af5a525cf5d}\VCRedistD11x86, error: 0x80070642.
[13C8:0C8C][2015-03-22T11:44:17]i372: Session end, registration key: SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{fec93b6d-17f6-4952-96e1-2af5a525cf5d}, resume: ARP, restart: None, disable resume: No
[13C8:0C8C][2015-03-22T11:44:17]i371: Updating session, registration key: SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{fec93b6d-17f6-4952-96e1-2af5a525cf5d}, resume: ARP, restart initiated: No, disable resume: No
[0F28:11A4][2015-03-22T11:44:17]i000: MUX: Apply Complete: Disk Space Used in bytes for Installation: MaxAppDrive: 0 MaxSysDrive: 2998272 AppDrive: 0 SysDrive: 1826816
[0F28:11A4][2015-03-22T11:44:17]i000: MUX: Free Disk Space after install: SystemDrive C:\ 37906563072 bytes AppDrive C:\ 37906563072 bytes
[0F28:11A4][2015-03-22T11:44:17]i000: MUX: Go to Finished page.
[0F28:11A4][2015-03-22T11:44:17]i399: Apply complete, result: 0x80070660, restart: None, ba requested restart: No

Hello Barry,
Thanks for reply.
Sorry for inaccuracy, I have 36 GB free space on my system drive, its total size is 128GB.
Subinacl installation failed with error "Internal Error 2755. 1632", here is a part of installer logs, maybe it helps...
******* Product: D:\Soft\subinacl.msi
******* Action: INSTALL
******* CommandLine: **********
MSI (s) (5C:00) [11:32:19:372]: Machine policy value 'DisableUserInstalls' is 0
MSI (s) (5C:00) [11:32:19:387]: Note: 1: 2203 2: C:\Windows\Installer\inprogressinstallinfo.ipi 3: -2147287037
MSI (s) (5C:00) [11:32:19:387]: Machine policy value 'LimitSystemRestoreCheckpointing' is 0
MSI (s) (5C:00) [11:32:19:387]: Note: 1: 1715 2: Windows Resource Kit Tools - SubInAcl.exe
MSI (s) (5C:00) [11:32:19:387]: Calling SRSetRestorePoint API. dwRestorePtType: 0, dwEventType: 102, llSequenceNumber: 0, szDescription: "Installed Windows Resource Kit Tools - SubInAcl.exe".
MSI (s) (5C:00) [11:32:19:403]: The call to SRSetRestorePoint API succeeded. Returned status: 0, llSequenceNumber: 345.
MSI (s) (5C:00) [11:32:19:403]: Note: 1: 1336 2: 3 3: C:\Windows\Installer\
MSI (s) (5C:00) [11:32:19:403]: MainEngineThread is returning 1632
MSI (s) (5C:40) [11:32:19:403]: Calling SRSetRestorePoint API. dwRestorePtType: 13, dwEventType: 103, llSequenceNumber: 345, szDescription: "".
MSI (s) (5C:40) [11:32:19:403]: The call to SRSetRestorePoint API succeeded. Returned status: 0.
MSI (s) (5C:40) [11:32:19:403]: User policy value 'DisableRollback' is 0
MSI (s) (5C:40) [11:32:19:403]: Machine policy value 'DisableRollback' is 0
MSI (s) (5C:40) [11:32:19:403]: Incrementing counter to disable shutdown. Counter after increment: 0
MSI (s) (5C:40) [11:32:19:403]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\Rollback\Scripts 3: 2
MSI (s) (5C:40) [11:32:19:403]: Note: 1: 1402 2: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\Rollback\Scripts 3: 2
MSI (s) (5C:40) [11:32:19:403]: Decrementing counter to disable shutdown. If counter >= 0, shutdown will be denied. Counter after decrement: -1
MSI (c) (B4:BC) [11:32:19:403]: Note: 1: 2755 2: 1632 3: D:\Soft\subinacl.msi
DEBUG: Error 2755: Server returned unexpected error 1632 attempting to install package D:\Soft\subinacl.msi.
Internal Error 2755. 1632, D:\Soft\subinacl.msi
MSI (c) (B4:BC) [11:32:21:648]: Product: Windows Resource Kit Tools - SubInAcl.exe -- Internal Error 2755. 1632, D:\Soft\subinacl.msi

Outlook 2013 XLS Attachments cannot be opened in Excel 2013 due to Trusted Center restrictions with Outlook Secure Temp Folder

Dear all,
I'm having some serious issues with Office 2013's Trusted Center settings. In Outlook 2013 XLS Attachments cannot be directly opened in Excel 2013 with double-clicking due to Trusted Center restrictions for Excel 2013 regarding Outlook's Secure Temp Folder.
I tried to adjust the corresponding Office 2013 Administrative Template within my GPOs but to no prevail.
I did find out that Outlook 2013 places an attachment within the Outlook Secure Temp Folder located at "C:\Users\a.ollischer\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\PPIU10RW” before passing it to Excel 2013 in order to
open it. It fails due to not trusting this location though I added the corresponding path to my Trusted Locations.
What can I do in order to make this work without having to tediously save each and every attachment to "My Documents" prior to opening it? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Alex
Alexander Ollischer Diplom-Wirtschaftsinformatiker (FH) Citrix & Microsoft Certified Engineer (CCEA, CCEE, MCSA, MCSE, MCDBA, MCTS) Afontis IT+Services GmbH Baierbrunner Straße 15 81379 München Deutschland Telefon (089) 74 34 55-0 Fax (089) 74 34 55-55
mailto:[email protected] http://www.afontis.de http://www.itganzeinfach.de Amtsgericht München, HRB 109 005 Geschäftsführer: Thomas Klimmer

Hi Maurice 7785,
Deal and customize attachment security behavior to access such kind of blocked file format. Usually, Outlook does not allow users to open such unsafe type of attachments. It means they are blocked them by default, so you need to unblock such items using REG
values.
Take more help from the similar thread:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/53563c4b-d27f-4866-a5a8-95eb1ad1a3e6/hide-attachements?forum=outlook
Note: Improve community discussions by marking the answers helpful otherwise respond back for further help.
Thanks
Clark Kent

Function module to get the file path in the system for TEMP folder

Hi All,
Is there any function module that I can use to get the file path in the system for TEMP folder.
I mean, i am supposed to give only TEMP as the input for that function module and I need to get the path of that in the system as the output.
I am unsing 4.0 version.
Please advice.
Regards
Ramesh

In Higher versions, we can use the below code:
call method CL_GUI_FRONTEND_SERVICES=>ENVIRONMENT_GET_VARIABLE
    exporting
      VARIABLE   = 'TEMP'
    importing
      VALUE      = LV_TMP
    exceptions
      CNTL_ERROR = 1
      others     = 2.
if SY-SUBRC <> 0.
    message id SY-MSGID type SY-MSGTY number SY-MSGNO
    with SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
endif.
call method CL_GUI_CFW=>FLUSH
    exceptions
      CNTL_SYSTEM_ERROR = 1
      CNTL_ERROR        = 2
      others            = 3.
if SY-SUBRC <> 0.
Error handling
endif.
concatenate lv_tmp '\' into folder_path.
But need to know in the lower versions like 3.1h and 4.0,

Save as dialog on exit in Temp Folder

Hi,
We have made a little program that create a PDF in windows temp folder (C:\Users\username\AppData\Local\Temp). We open it and the user can modify is content.
After we check if they change and send back to our application.
My problem is when the user want to save his change.
No problem if the user clic on File->save in Adobe. The file is save without problem in the temp folder and after the user clic to close adobe.
But if the user doesn't save and clic for close adobe, the dialog of Abode come and it ask if you would like to save your change. If the user click yes,
a dialog box save as come and want to save the document on the desktop.
If we put our file in another folder (not C:\Users\username\AppData\Local\Temp) the dialog "save as" doesn't appear after we have press yes to the dialog "Would you like to save your change?".
So could you say me if we can disable this "Save as" dialog when we are on temporary folder ?
Thanks for your Help

Those of us using Leopard routinely learned very quickly to click on the Save button and briefly hold on it. You will then get the Save As dialog you desire, and other options. It is only the quick click that defaults to use the designated Download folder.
Ernie

PDF XChange annotations are not saving (temp folder problem?)

Hello,
I'm having a problem with the XChange PDF viewer within Firefox:
When annotating a file outside of Firefox, I can save the changes and have them reappear
when I close and re-open the file
Doing this inside Firefox, I cannot, it appears that the files are saved, but they do no
reappear on re-opening. This is true even when annotating a file that is opened from my
hard drive (as opposed to opening it from a website)
Doing this inside IE, it works properly. However, I need to use Firefox here at work
instead of IE or XChange separately.
I believe the problem lies in the fact that when XChange/FF open a pdf inside FF, a file
is created in C:\Temp and the changes are somehow being lost here. Interestingly, if I
take the file opened within FF and open it in XChange outside the browser (by using the
button in the bottom left of the viewer pane) I _still_ cannot save my changes, and I now
get an error message along the lines of:
‘Error saving document to “c:\Temp\pdf38.tmp”:
Error [IO subsystem]: Invalid access mode’
where 'pdf38.tmp' is the name of the temp folder created when the original file was
opened within FF.
I didn’t have these problems a few months ago, so it’s something to do with the new
versions of XChange and FF. Please let me know what you can do to fix this. I really
like using XChange, but if this can’t be fixed I’ll have to switch to something else to
do my work.
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== Reinstalling latest versions of FF and PDF X-Change

I wrote a ton of notes and I freaked out when it didn't work so I emailed the pdf to myself, and its the current version with all the notes that I had just taken.
try it out! it worked for me

Duplicates in temp folder

I've recently upgraded to PS Elements V7. I've noticed that when I modify the date/time of a picture, it is leaving a duplicate copy of the picture in my temp folder (path is C:\Documents and Settings\username\Local Settings\temp). The only difference between this picture file and the original in my "my pictures" folder, is the date of the file/picture.
There is also an empty "Adobe" and empty "editor" sub-folder in this temp folder.
I've noticed that this duplicate file appears only when I modify the date/time of a picture, not if I do a full edit of the picture and save it (then it just overwrites the original picture in the "my pictures" folder.
I've tried closing PS Elements and rebooting the computer, but the files in the temp folder are still there. I deleted all of these pictures and through Elements modified a picture, checked that it had duplicated in temp (it had), closed element, rebooted...still there.
As I've never noticed this before (I usually clear out the temp folder about 1x a week and have been an elements user for years), I'm wondering what is causing it? If it is normal? Is there a way to disable it?
As this temp folder is somewhat hidden (most/many computer users probably don't know how to access it), the fact that it is retaining full duplicate copies of modified pictures that must be manually deleted means that many users hard drives may be filling up unnecessarily with these files.
I've checked in elements and noted that it points to the original picture in the "my pictures" folder and not to the temp folder duplicate. Deleting the temp folder pictures does not seem to affect elements. I've also tried the folder view option in elements to see if it was "recognizing" these duplicates in temp, but the temp folder does not even come up as accessible.
Thanks for any help, insight...Mike Villella

John, thanks for the reply. I wonder if anyone else is missing a lot of disk space due to files in a temp folder that don't know about. I would think that closing the program and/or rebooting would flush this folder, but apparently not.
I use Norton Protected Recycle bin. Never noticed a similar problem before. I just did an "unerase" function with the recycle bin and there were a lot of old files that are associated with elements, just not any actual pix.
I do keep finished photos on a NAS drive, but the photos in question are on the hard drive (C drive).
I did the process again paying more attention. Started by deleting everything in the temp folder and rebooting.
The file had a date taken of 12/5/99 a created date of 1/3/09 and a modified date of 1/24/09 and was in "My pictures". Upon adjusting the time/date to 12/15/99, a new file popped up in the temp folder, same name, size, rez, etc. The temp file has a date taken of 12/5/99, a created date of 1/25/09 and a modified date of 1/24/09, same as the old file except the new created date of today.
The picture in "my pictures" is also same size, name and rez. The date taken has the new date of 12/15/99, and a modified and created date of 1/25/09 (today).
So apparently, upon adjusting the time/date, the original file is being duplicated and created in temp, while the original file is being updated with the new date entered and today's date as created and modified.
The duplicated file in temp is basically orphaned. Elements does not appear to link to it or see it. When I delete it manually, it does not affect Elements.
So, I guess I can understand why a temp file is created during the process (but, by the same token, not sure why the same thing doesn't happen during a full edit), but I'm not sure why it is left in temp and not automatically deleted at some point. Does that make sense or am I missing something?
Also, I notice a amt, alm, libFNP_events, and swtag file being created in this temp folder (C:\documents and settings\username\local settings\temp). They don't seem to ever auto delete either.

Temp Folder Bulging

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for