The  vendor code is not coming against some Assignment line items with the

Hi All,
While executing  t.code FBL3N,the  vendor code is not coming against some Assignment line items with the GL A/C4607000, some line items it is coming.
The GL A/c 4607000 is GR/IR clearing a/c.
Please let us know  why this situation is happeing at the time of FBL3N.
Thanks
Ram

HI,
By activating the special fields you can the vendor number, but use the new reprot called "FAGLL03 - Display/Change Items (New) ".
First go to SPRO> Financial Accounting (New)> General Ledger Accounting (New)--> Master Data > G/L Accounts>Line Items --> Define Special Fields for Line Item Display
Click on New Entries -
Table - BSEG - Field - LIFNR
Save. Now execute the report - FAGLL03 - Display/Change Items (New)
Give the gl account number and execute.
After getting the line items list from menu select --Settings --> Special Fields --> Click on New Entries --> Enter Table BSEG, Field Name LIFNR.
After this come back and execute again. It will give you the vendor number.
Thanks & Regards,
Shashi Kanth.

Similar Messages

  • My iPad 4 wifi 3G keeps charging slowly takes half a hour to get to 15% when plug into the wall with the plug and the lead what come with the iPad just wondering as I think some thing is wrong with the iPad

    My iPad 4 wifi 3G keeps charging slowly takes half a hour to get to 15% when plug into the wall with the plug and the lead what come with the iPad just wondering as I think some thing is wrong with the iPad

    Using the battery level meter in this manner is comparable to using your car's fuel gauge to calculate miles per gallon. The only thing that matters is the total amount of operating time from full charge to auto-shutdown.
    Use the wall-mount charger that came with the iPad and charge overnight.  Do NOT use an iPod/iPhone charger.  Do NOT use a computer's USB port.  Then, operate it normally until auto shut-down (ignore any low level alerts that may appear).  An irony is that doing that test to determine the total operating time is also the procedure necessary to calibrate the battery level meter.
    I'm not claiming that you do not have a problem.  I am stating, however, that we don't yet know.  If the above test does, in fact, indicate a problem, read this.
    Also, according to Apple:
    Use Your iPad Regularly
    For proper reporting of the battery’s state of charge, be sure to go through at least one charge cycle per month (charging the battery to 100% and then completely running it down).
    Elsewhere, Apple elaborates and explains that two half-discharges (or four quarter-discharges, etc.) equals one full discharge.

  • Adding  some more  line  items  in  the  unconfirmed  Transfer Order

    Hi  All,
         We do kitting activity at our warehouse i.e. several components make up an assembly of a particular final product. The WH creates a production order(BOM) based on which the system creates TO wherever stock of individual components are available for picking. However, the remaining components which are required to make up the product are still awaited in such a case (stock unavailable at present). Under this situation, is it possible that the balance remaining components can be added to the same original TO created earlier (i.e. where only available line items of that TO is confirmed and the TO header is still open).
    Alternatively, can we add  some more  line  items  in  the  same unconfirmed  Transfer Order to facilitate this kitting process and thereby confirming the TO header finally.
    A quick feedback will be appreciated. Thanks.
    Regards
    Jaman

    Hi,
    If you know what all the items you will include in one TO, even though you haven't pick the items;
    In the TO, you have an option to make the items "Inactive" for which picking hasn't been done.
    After making the items "Inactive", if you save the TO, it will allow you to confirm the TO, but then, it will create the new TO with the inactive items.
    Hope its clear.
    Aktar

  • Change Shipment Costs [VI02]:costs are not spread against all PO line items

    The Finance department is correcting the shipment cost for all inbound deliveries from overseas via Change Shipment Costs via transaction VI02.
    They expect the change to be always spread across all line items, however it happens often that the shipping costs are posted only against the last Purchase Order line items.
    The Purchase Order contains 7 lines that are variants but only last line shows the Shipping cost in the Purchase Order History.
    I am trying to understand what are the components that drive the distribution of shipping cost across the original Purchase Order.
    And where the error lie, ie: user procedure or configuration.
    For Inbound Shipments:
    Item category shipment costs Z001 has been created in t.code T_71 linked to Item determination procedure group Z001.
    Pricing procedures ZTRSSC has been created
    And pricing procedure determination for shipment costs T_73 has been set up for transportation planning point 1610 and 1630.
    Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.
    Sincerely,
    Richard

    Hi,
    we have tried to use the header level setting, but this is only to use the condition as a header condition.
    For example, if we have 50 EUR for head condition in an PO, each PO item gets this 50 EUR. We want a "global" condition for all PO items.

  • Sales order create/change line item with reference to contract - Open quantity not getting deducted for copied line item from the contract

    Hi friends,
    Please provide some valuable inputs for the following scenario:
    When a sales order line item is created(VA01) or changed(VA02) with reference to a Contract the open quantity is deducted in the contract which is a standard functionality. If the referenced line item is copied (custom enhancement to copy line item), then for the copied line item the open quantity is not getting deducted instead ATP quantity i.e. Available-to-promise is deducted.
    Any inputs on how we can fix this functionality i.e. deduct the open quantity from the contract for the copied line item?
    P.S. : Custom enhancement to copy line item is working fine, but open quantity is not getting deducted if the copied line item was referenced to a contract.
    Thanks,
    Sandeep
    Message was edited by: sandeep

    Sandeep,
    Yes, that was my original interpretation.  I was having a hard time believing that someone would ask such a question. 
    I guess, then, that you already know that you will have to add this logic to your enhancement. You should create your specifications and hand them off to a developer; ideally the one who created this enhanced solution in the first place.
    I do not provide advice in these forums about details of enhanced solutions.  Perhaps one of the other members will be more willing to do your work for you.
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • PO printout is not coming after changing only line item Delivery Address

    Hi
    Can anybody suggest a solution for the problem?
    Using ME22N , if I change the line item delivery address details to the already generated manual address number ( Not generated using Transaction MEAN)
    If I save the PO then PO Printout is not coming but output message log showing " No print-relevant changes to document XXXXXXXXX exist"
    We can read CDHR and CDPOS table for changes .
    Is there a way to pass the parameter to the print program to Print the changes?
    Thanks
    sanath
    Edited by: sanath kumar sarvepalli-venkata on Nov 2, 2010 11:23 PM

    Hi,
    In IMG - Materials Management- Purchasing-Messages - Fields relevant to Print out of changes
    Enter Table EKPO , Reference Field LOEKZ, tick on change print relevant for purchase order,in routine enter 03.
    Now your Output will be triggered with a change indicator and you can process it using ME9F.
    Regards
    Chandra Shekhar

  • Im trying to install Adobe Premiere Elements on Window 8.  The Windows Installer is not working.. some window pops up with an error message and it does not install

    I get the following window pop up after trying to install Adobe Premiere Elements.  After it prompts me to select the language i get this:

    I think I figued it out... But why installations instructions didn't come up when I inserted the disk was very annoying. And because they didn't, Adobe should post th installations instructions somewhere on their support site. Not here now, which is also annoying. 

  • After a PAI, I am not able to slect line items in the table control.

    Dear All,
    In GR55 Report;after a PAI triggered (by Enter button or vertical scroll bar),  I am not able to select any line-items in the table control. If no PAI triggered, the I am able to select as much as line item..
    Can anybody help me..
    -Ullas U

    before display, while debugging , after pai, it will go in pbo modules,
    so there u need to check the structure screen for the variable select. u might have declare one variable like sel(1) type c,
    these variable u have written in table control attributes in select variable as itab-sel.
    so check in debugging first.

  • How user can get a Sales Text for the any Line Item in the Billing?

    Salute Masters ! !
    How user can get a Sales Text for the any Line Item in the Billing?
    It's coming for other Order (Line Item for Bought out Item at Project Site - Some Item they procure at project site & complete the task).
    Where I can configure in system for all.
    Rgds
    Srivastav
    09973504950

    Hi,
    Sales text can be copied from customer to order , order to delivery and delivery to billing .
    Check the T-code : VOTXN , do the customization as per your requirement.
    check the below link :
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/dd/55f993545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/content.htm

  • No cost booking against sales order+line item once accontng release is done

    Dear all,
    I want to stop all cost bookings against a sales order + line item once the accounting release for that item has been done.
    By cost booking i mean, all such transactions that are done for a sales order + line item that involve cost booking. Like, MB1A should not allow any goods issue against that sales order + item once accounting release is done.
    Is it possible to that in sales order? Like by using any status at item level.
    Please guide.
    regards
    SAPshed

    Hi Ajay,
    We have not kept automatic cost estimate marking during saving of sales order as costing dept wants  to confirm whether costing for the SO is correct or not.
    Hence we have to use CK51N.
    Now the problem is for any change in any line item of a sales order is changing the costing status from "VO" to "KA" for all line items of the given sales order in table KEKO.
    This is causing measure problem as production people are facing problem while making any change in production order as already there is a check put in CO02 that if cost estimate does not exist for underlying sales order, then change in production order should not be allowed.
    Similarly production order creation (converting planned order to production order) is getting held up.
    Costing user has to repeated run CK51N for all line items of a single sales order if there is any change in any single line item of the sales order.
    Hence pl. help and suggest as to what is to be done now.
    Regards
    Ratna

  • New line item in the service contract

    Hi Gurus,
    I have requirement to add the new line item in the service contract. Details are as follows.
    as per the requirment, manually we are entering the outbound category via web Ui (service -> service contract).Now I have to develope a badi/method  in standard badi exec_methodcall_ppf which will insert a new line item with the same material as of outbout category but with the item category as inboud.
    could you please help in how can I maintain the new line time. I know we have to use the crm_order_maintain FM but I'm confused what all parameter we need to pass to maintain this.
    can someone please share the code to do that. TIA

    Hi Paul,
    It seems there is no option in changing the condition records at the billing plan item level.
    Please try the following.. see if it helps. To execute the invoices with new condition record values directly, make the settings at the billing item category level goto -- the billing document frame -- under serivces frame -- pricing type select option Carryout new pricing (Option B). This option updates the billing document at the time of invoicing with new price calculation.
    please see if this can help you out.
    Have a good day!!!
    Nandu

  • Condition type not getting populated at first line item of Sales order

    Hi Experts,
    We are creating Sales order through IDOC(Inbound function: IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS) for Document type ZXX then condition type is geeting populated at both line item, i have tried creating the Sales order through IDOC for document type ZYY the condition type is not getting populated in first line item, but for secod line item condition is getting populated.
    we also checked pricing procedures related to this document types and we found these pricing types are mentioned in corresponding pricing procedures.
    Let us know  there are any other possible ways to find the same
    please help.
    Thanks!

    Hi Rajani,
    check the user exit in the FM..IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS
    check if any filters kept for condition type field..
    check the belwo user eixuts
    ORDCHG I VEDB0001 Sales Ord. Change
    ORDERS I VEDA0001 Sales Orders..
    Regards,
    Prabhudas

  • User defined Characterestics not being updated in actual line items

    Gurus!
    I am using Accounting Based COPA only.
    I have defined a user based characteristic for which I am using user exit to derive.
    However, this charaterstic is not getting updated in actual line items.
    The derivation is working correctly at Sales order and Invoicing documents. (account assignment tab).
    Where could I be going wrong??
    Regards
    Saurabh

    Hi,
    Please check the settlement rule of the sales order and check whether the relevant characteristics have been maintained in the settlement rule of PSG. If not, you may have to include the same.
    Trust this helps much.
    Cheers

  • Rounding PR00 in header level (+1 item with the same material)

    I have currently a problem, my customer prints the invoice by sumarizing the materials (line items with the same material and pr00), but by doing this the unit price by the quantity is not correct because the rouding at line item is not the same when we put all together.
    e.g.
    line 1 - qty = 7,5 and pr00 = 0,15 ->total of 1,125 -> stays in line item with 1,13
    line 2 - qty = 7,5 and pr00 = 0,15 ->total of 1,125 -> stays in line item with 1,13
    in the layout we have a total of 2,26, but in real we must have 2,25 if we see this like a header group.
    Can we have a rounding solution for the PR00? like we have for discounts using a rouding routine?
    thanks in advance,
    joao

    in the layout we have a total of 2,26, but in real we must have 2,25
    Since the issue is only in output of billing document, you have to take the help of ABAPer and modify the smart form.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • 1 line item in the sales order ship to different shipping address

    Hi,
    Our customer A have 3 different branches (meaning 3 different shipping address).
    During the creation of the sales order for 1 material A, I want to ship 50pc to this customer A:
    10pc to address A1
    20pc to address A2
    20pc to address A3
    In my sales order, is there a way I just create 1 line item with the order qty 50pc for this material A, but split into 3 schedule line with 3 different ship to address?
    I know there is alternate way where I create 3 different line item (with order qty 10, 20 and 20) and change the ship to address in the Item -> Partner tab. But using this method, I have to create 3 times of the same material in 1 sales order, just with the different shipping address.
    I want to know is there a way I just need to create 1 line item?
    Kindly please advise. Thank you.

    Hi there,
    When you have 3 different ship-to address, system will anyway create 3 different deliveries. This is coz if the header data in shipping (ship-to) is different, system will split the deliveries. Routes are different to 3 ship-to addresses & they cannot be combined in the same delivery.
    So as mentioned in above thread, create 3 different line items or create different sales orders all together for different ship-to parties.
    Regards,
    Sivanand

Maybe you are looking for