Three system TMS in one transport group, error tp parameter in QAS

Hi,
There is 3 system TMS, which is DEV (phycial system,transport domain controller), QAS (virtual system), PRD (virtual system).
And I tried to replace the virtual QAS with the phycial QAS with these steps:
1. excute STMS in DEV,delete the virtual QAS
2. in QAS, configure STMS with transport domain_DEV
3. in DEV,approve QAS as the sytem of transport domain_DEV (the QAS shows with transport group QAS)
4. changed the QAS transport group from group QAS to group DEV
5. configure and active the transport route as standard 3 system TMS
after the below steps, I checked system overview in STMS, in QAS, the tp parameter shows the transport directory is the local trans directory, not the transport directory in DEV. That's why I I can not find any transport queue in QAS system.But the file TP_DOMAIN_DEV also exist in the trans\bin directory of QAS.
after that,
1.I added the full authorization of trans directory for user sapserviceDEV and sapserviceQAS,
2.I cleared the files in the trans directory of QAS
3.I cleared the configuration of QAS,and reconfigued it
But I got the same error message.
Note: when I install the QAS,I fill in the hostname of QAS as the transport host.
How can I fix it?
Thanks in advance.
BR,
Randy

Hello Randy,
May be there is something wrong in how the set up in TMS for QAS was done. Please refer this link and ensure all steps were taken:
Re: STMS Configuration - Change Virtual System with Real System
I mean did you delete STMS in QAS originally?
Regards.
Ruchit.

Similar Messages

Error checking transport group configuration in System BQS

Hi Everyone,
I made a client export from Production to Quality. It went successfully,, I noted the requests numbers and transported them from PRD to Quality, but while transporting there was a tp error(which i did not note), next i went to the quality import queue and saw all the 3 requests had come. But when i click the adjust queue icon im getting the following error message "Error checking transport group configuration in System BQS" . Afterwards i tried to delete the requests from quality to retransport from production but still im not able to delete those requests from quality. Can anyone help me solve this.
Regards,
Rahul

Hello Rahul,
regarding the error message:
"Error checking transport group configuration in system"
It's mostly related to the TMSADM RFC destination. Kindly follow the below mention steps:
1. Logon to client 000 with user DDIC.
2. STMS > System > Overview > Select the system in which you are logged in > Click on the menu says EXTRAS > Generate RFC Destinations
Perform the above steps in all the systems configure in your TMS. This should resolve the issue.
Best regards,
Tomas Black

Transport Groups: One Technical System targets two technical systems

Hi guys,
One question relating to transport groups.
Is it possible to define for one technical system which belongs to one group, let's say DEV, two target Business Systems which belong to another group, let's say PRD?
Meaning,
Technical System XPTO targets:
Group PRD Tech System: XPTO2
Group PRD Tech System: XPTO3
Thanks

Hi VJ,
Sorry, wrong word...I meant Tech System to 2 Tech Systems.
Having DEV System targeted to QLD and PRD tech system which are on the same group.
DEV Tech System targets to group
Group PRD : QLD Tech System
Group PRD : PRD Tech System

Load more than one user groups to system session variable GROUP from table

hi, I found that the value of the system session variable GROUP can be assigned by setting a sql in initialization blocks.
however, if there are some users with more than one user group.
can this be done by table driven (using sql in initialization blocks) ?
thanks !!

Referencing GROUP session variable in initialization blocks for different types of authentication
http://108obiee.blogspot.com/2009/10/referencing-group-session-variable-in.html
Users are assigned to multiple groups from external table with semicolons, see example two and three from the post.
Regards
Goran
http://108obiee.blogspot.com

Can there be more than one transport targets for a business system in sld

Hi All,
I have a question about transport targets in sld for sap xi 3.0 sp19.
We have a requirement where a business system needs to have two transport targets.In SLD i see that only one transport target can be assigned. Is there any way to assign more than one transport target to a business system?
I know that there can be more than one source for a business system where more than one different business systems have the same business system as the target.
I am not sure if a business system can have more than one transport target .If yes , what is the way to add more than one ?
Please help .
Thanks,
Padmaja

Hello,
I know that there can be more than one source for a business system where more than one different business systems have the same business system as the target.
As far as I know, you would have to change the target everytime you will transport it to a different target e.g 3 target systems = 3 times you change the transport target in SLD.
Regards,
Mark

Executing one system command from one java class. ERROR. Please help me

Hello i am trying to add users into one linux machine using one jaav program but when i execute the java class the system doesn't show me any error and dont make anything.
The linux command, in the main of the class, is correct; from thelinux shell it runs well, but from the java class it doesn't run.
Can you help me please?
thanks
import java.io.*;
public class ejecutaUsuario {
/** Creates a new instance of ejecutaUsuario */
public ejecutaUsuario(String cmdline) {
try {
String line;
Process p = Runtime.getRuntime().exec(cmdline);
BufferedReader input =
new BufferedReader
(new InputStreamReader(p.getInputStream()));
while ((line = input.readLine()) != null) {
System.out.println(line);
input.close();
catch (Exception err) {
err.printStackTrace();
System.out.println(err);
public static void main(String argv[]) {
String passwd="hola";
String usuarioInterno="xxxxxx";
new ejecutaUsuario("/bin/sh useradd -p `openssl passwd -1 -salt 12345678 " + passwd + "` -d /home/" + usuarioInterno + " -m -s /bin/bash " + usuarioInterno);

Try gettting the error input stream as well (getErrorStream()). Maybe you are getting output there.
You might want to try just executing the 'useradd' part, getting the output stream of that process, and then put the parameters of useradd into the outputstream.
Later
Cardwell

Check Transport Tool error

Hi,
We are having a problem when checking the transport tool for our PRD system from the domain controller which is DEV system. Our landscape is this:
Our DEV system/server resides in one location, the QAS and PRD server resides on another location which has different network than DEV. Is that possible to configure the transport management system with that kind of landscape? And if it is okay for a transport route to be generated for the three systems?
When we check on the transport tool for PRD system from domain controller, we are getting inconsistent output. Please see attached screenshot.
Hoping for a prompt response.
Thank you!
Regards,
AJ

Hi Deepanshu,
Yes i have configured it by including PS3 and QS3 in the domain system of DEV (Domain controller) and approved it their. but when i do the distribute and activate TMS configuration, QS3 and PS3 is interrupted. Please see below error:
And i again checked the RFC connections it is all working fine.
But when i check the transport tool for PS3 it says below error:
Thank you!
Regards,
AJ

ChaRM: Support of more than one transport layer

Hi!
We would like to implement ChaRM for the 3 tier landscape (DEV:100 --> QAS:200 --> PRD:100) with several transport layers and transport routes:
a) u201CZDEVu201D u2013 Standard transport layer
b) u201CSAPu201D u2013 SAP transport layer
c) u201CYCSTu201D u2013 transport layer for internal customizing
d) u201CZEXTu201D u2013 transport layer for external vendor
All the transport layers should be used for the transports from DEV:100 to QAS:200 within ChaRM.
Our question:
Does ChaRM support several transport layers (SAP and none-SAP)?
Or does it accept only standard transport layer
(u201CSAPu201D and u201CZDEVu201D, but it doesnu2019t support u201CYCSTu201D and u201CZEXTu201D)?
Thank you very much!
regards

Hi
ChaRM only supports one (the standard) transport layer per client. I've already told you that some days ago... You can trust me I've configured those landscapes several times for many customers.
Enclosed please find a statement from SAP:
Transports are supported in the standard transport layer of each client. When you configure transport routes, note that only consolidation routes that are assigned to the standard transport layer of the relevant exporting client are taken into consideration. For each exporting client, exactly one target client and one target group are permitted.
We recommend that you assign exactly one development system to a production system, and that these two systems are connected by exactly one unique transport track.
If a development system and a production system are connected by more than one transport track, this may lead to inconsistencies within the transport distribution. This type of transport configuration cannot be supported by Change Request Management, and may cause inconsistencies within the tools involved.
So you have to change your TMS configuration and the assignment of transport layers to development packages. e.g. use transport layer SAP and ZDEV
Then it is possible to use ChaRM and standard TMS together
regards
Andy

2 consolidation routes, one transport layer - not possible

Hello everyone,
I have one DEV system and two QAS systems. Some of my development need to go to both of two systems, however some of them need to go to only one of my QAS.
So I have set up two transport groups: one link to both of two QAS and another one link to one of them. Because it is not possible for 2 consolidation routes with one transport layer, so there would be much of trouble when I need to transport my own development into that one QAS------I need to manually change the object directory entry/package for it first.
So I would like to know is there any way easier to set up the landscape so that the developer can easily choose the correct transport target in our situation?
Thank you very much in advance for your help!
Best regards,
Keith

Hi Keith,
please do not mix up transport groups (systems sharing one transport directory) with transport target groups.
If you have one development system DEV and two QA-Systems QA1 / QA2 then there are 3 options: Transport from DEV to QA1 only, transport from DEV to QA2 only and transport from DEV to both QA1 and QA2. To realize this, you need three consolidation routes starting in DEV. One with transport layer (say) ZQA1 pointing to QA1, one with transport layer (say) ZQA2 pointing to QA2 and on with transport layer (say) ZALL pointing to the transport target group which in turn points to QA1 and QA2. Then you need to create 3 packages (formerly: development classes) poining to one of these three transport layers. For example ZPACKZQA1, ZPACKZQA2, ZPACKZALL. Then when you create a programm you need to specify a package. Depending on the package you choose, the program will be transported to either QA1 only, QA2 only or both QA1 and QA2.
Best regards
Thomas

Transportation group at delivery header

Dear Friends,
while creating the delivery from some of the plants transportation group not determined at delivery header level, but i can find the same at item level.
Can you please let me know how it gets determined at header level, if there is any specal setting required.
customer is having the shipping condition
Material is having the transportation group
route is determined properly..
the only the proble is transportation zone at delivery header level.
can you treat this one as top prioiry and let me know.
thanks
Raju.

if it there then only it gets determined at the dlivery item level
I know very well this but wanted you to check whether any deletion is made in the meanwhile.
for few of the cases it is working fine
What those few cases are ?? Different delivery type ?? Different Material code ?? You need to analyse this and compare in your system.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi
ps: spell the name correctly

How to manage transport groups in SLD

Hi all,
I am facing some problems while trying to create/assign transports groups to the Business systems in my SLD. (i am using PI 7.0)
I have only 2 XI boxes (one for DEV and the other one for PRD) BUT my R/3 landscape consists of 3 environments (DEV, QA and PRD). I created 3 groups in the SLD but i had to assign every group to a Integration server, so i couldnt
Could you please give me some help about how to handle this kind of scenarios??
Any ideas or examples?
Thanks in advance for your support,
David de Miguel

Do you have 1 central SLD or local on each XI?
What is the issue you are having specifically?
Have you tried creating the 2 'true' XI groups and assigning every DEV system to the DEV group and all PROD systems to PROD group.
You can choose to assign your QA to DEV group - your only QA objects should be the backend - this is not mandatory.
Make the promotion (source-target) assignment for the groups as follows DEV --> PROD
Since you are moving IR and ID objects across these groups then it will work correctly.
sincerely,
--NM

SQL Exceptions, transport-level errors on SharePoint 2010 App Server

SharePoint 2010 becomes inaccessible 2-3 times per day. It happens at approximately the same times: 8 PM, 1 AM and 1 PM. It is inaccessible for about 3-4 minutes and then comes back on its own.
During the time it is down, we see the following errors in the event viewer on the application server:
EventID: 5586 Task Category: Database -
Unknown SQL Exception 64 occurred. Additional error information from SQL Server is included below.A transport-level error has occurred when receiving results from the server.
(provider: TCP Provider, error: 0 - The specified network name is no longer available.)
EventID: 3 Task Category: None -
.Net SqlClient Data Provider: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: A transport-level error has occurred when receiving results from the server. (provider: TCP Provider, error:
0 - The specified network name is no longer available.)
EventID: 6398 Task Category: Timer -
The Execute method of job definition Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.Monitoring.HealthStatUpdateJobDefinition (ID f9db48f1-f115-47ab-99b6-552460cbb782) threw an exception. More
information is included below. A transport-level error has occurred when receiving results from the server. (provider: TCP Provider, error: 0 - The specified network name is no longer available.)
EventID: 8086 Task Category: Business Data -
The BDC Service application failed due to a SQL Exception: SQLServer host ums1spd1v. The error returned was: 'A transport-level error has occurred when sending the request to
the server. (provider: TCP Provider, error: 0 - An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host.)'
The SharePoint logs have errors during the same time period saying the same kinds of things: Sql exception raw message: A transport-level error has occurred when receiving results from the server,
The specified network name is no longer available, etc.
Our network administrator has looked at the issue and cannot find any network problems.
He setup a continuous ping from the app server to the database server.
Even during the times these errors are occurring, the app server is still able to reach the database server.
However, you cannot ping the app server itself during this time.
Our database administer cannot find any SQL Server issues.
There are no errors in the event viewer or the SQL logs on the database server.
In Central Admin, we can see that one or two jobs fail with SQL errors during the times these errors take place.
It is almost always the “User Profile Service Application – User Profile Language Synchronization Job” and often the “Health Statistics Updating” or “Crawl Log Report for Search Application Search Service Application”.
These jobs run successfully at many other times during the day.
Is there a good way to tell if the database, network or SharePoint itself is the root of these problems?
The database and network guys say there are no problems in their areas, but all I can find in the SharePoint logs is that it can’t reach the database server.
Thank you for any suggestions you may have!

Since these seem to happen at very specific times, I would run a NetMon trace at that window to capture what is going back and forth (or perhaps the timer service is just unable to reach the SQL server).
Trevor Seward, MCC
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Business system Doesnot change while transporting

Hi All,
When Transporting my business system from DEV to QA, my business system doesnot change. I already checked in SLD that my DEV business system is pointing to the correct system in QA. Also DEV and QA are on one SLD only.
You guys will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
---Satish

You also have to make sure that the DEV/QAS Business Systems are associated to the respective DEV/QAS XI system. For that, open the BS in SLD, go to the "Integration" tab and check the "Related Integration Server".
Also, make sure that both the DEV BS & DEV XI are inside the same "DEV" transport group in SLD, as well as the QAS BS & QAS XI are both in the same "QAS" group.
Regards,
Henrique.

Converting a two system landscape to three system landscape

Currently, I have a two system landscape: DEV (development) and PRD (production) in STMS
I would like to add a QAS system so I will end up with DEV-QAS-PRD in STMS
I would like to keep all data the way it is. I don't want to lose any logs or files in the data and cofiles directories.
This is how I have this planned:
-Include the QAS system in the existing Tranport Domain.(stms in QAS)
-In transaction STMS go to OVERVIEW -> Transport Routes -> Standard Configuration -> Three systems in group
and then save the configuration.(stms on the TDC)
I'm thinking this will preserrve the current log files and the corresponding data and cofile files.
If you have done this, I would appreciate any comment or advise.
Thanks.

Addition to above suggestion - Adding new system to existing landscape doesn't make any change to the data/cofiles. Process just adds additional system.
Regards,
Nick Loy

Change Request Flow In a Three System Landscape --- PLZ DO REPLY

Hi Experts,
I am new to SAP and have this doubt;
Suppose we have a three system landscape with DEV, QTY and PRD systems in it.
Say we create a new change request in DEV system. So to transport it to QTY we will release that request from DEV using T code se01 .
Now the request will come in QTY systems queue and we will login to the appropriate QTY client and import this request into the QTY system.
<b>No my basic doubt is, after the testing in QTY how do we move this request to PRD system ?</b>
Do we again release this request from QTY system using se01 or we need to go at the OS level in the QTY system and manually add this change request in the PRD system buffer ? ( Please send if any reference link is there)
I will really appreciate any info in this regard.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Mandeep

Hai Mandeep,
    First Thing,
    -->If you are maintaining a common transport directory,the released change
       request will be exported in that common transport directory..
    --->Now you just enter in to the server(which is Transport Domain
        Controller).
    --->In that go to Import Overview,now your QA server has one import req.
        you just click the req. and import that req..
>Now if you want to import the same req int o PRD.,Enter in to PRD
         server.Go to tcode STMS_IMPORT, In the top go to
           Extras>Other req.>add..click this and add that particular
         req.that you want to import in to PRD server..
    --->select that req and import that req...
Thanks & Regards,
Gopinathan.T

Three system TMS in one transport group, error tp parameter in QAS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for