Tolerance error..

Hi ,
Created Purchase order with account assignment V , having the total Qty 1 and Value of 624475
Vendor is send multiple invoice like below
Invoice No                    Amount
1                              124175
2                               138475
3                              361825
Since PO qty is 1 , I need to proportnate the Qty according to Value  i.e
Invoice No                 Amount             Qty
1                              124175                  0.199
2                              138475                  0.223
3                              361825                  0.578
When i am doing MIRO for invoice number 3 ( last invoice) , system propose the Value  of 360947 and Qty 0.578 , The proposed value is less than Vendor invoice value.. if i change the amount to vendor amt ( matching with PO Value ) , system is giving error message of Tolerance Key.
My Query is  why system is throwing tolerance error since i am changing the value up to PO Value.
Regards

Hello
The problem is not with the tolerance, it is with the calculation.
0.578X 624475  = 360946.55
So MIRO is doing what it's suppose to do.
Keep the amount the same and change the value
or undo the previous invoices and change the numbers to fit better.
And I have a suggestion for next time:
If it's not an inventory material change the way you make the PO so the value will be in the amount field and the price will be 1
that way when you get split invoices you make good receipt for the value that is invoiced and you have no problem in miro with impossible numbers .
Good luck

Similar Messages

  • Tolerance error in miro

    Dear Gurus,
    What is the root cause for the error message in miro, "Price too low (below tolerance limit of 10.23 INR". How to rectify it.
    Thanks & regards,
    Kumar

    Hi,
    YOu will need to go to OMR6, to check about the tolerance limit you have set for the MIRO.
    If your tolerance limit is less than 5 %, you will need to tell the user about this.
    Hope this can help.
    Thank you.
    kah Fei

  • Tolerance Error - VL063

    Hi peeps,
    Im Just wondering why my sales order are posting the Error for over tolerance, I define my sales order config to over tolerance = 5 and under = 5 also..
    hope someone can explain to me what ive miss out on process..
    Thanks in advance.

    In Sales Order,  Shipping Delivery Tolerance Section.
    It ought be either of the following need to be maintain
    Overdeliv. Tolerance or Underdel. Tolerance or Unlimited Tolerance
    not all.
    So, the mistake what you have done is
    over tolerance = 5 and also under = 5
    Where it should be either, not both.
    Regards
    JP

  • Integrating Flat File data to LDAP Directory using sunopsis driver

    Hello
    I need to import data from a csv file into a LDAP Directory.
    In order to acheive this, i used Demo physical and logical File data server (called FILE_GENERIC) and set up a new LDAP data server using tutorial "Oracle Data Integrator Driver for LDAP - User's Manual".
    I can manually see and update data on both file and LDAP datastores.
    The fact is that i cannot manage to import/update data from the file to the LDAP directory through a dedicated interface.
    The issue do, i think, come from the PK/FK used by sunopsis relational model to represent the directory.
    LDAP DN is represented by a set of two table representing in my example the organizational units in one hand and the persons in the other hands, linking them through FK in persons to auto-generated PK in organization units. My person table also have a auto generated PK. All the directory datastore tables have been reversed through ODI.
    In my interface, i always use my cn as update key.
    I first tried not to map the person PK in the interface, letting the driver generating it for me (or mapping a null PK). I then catch in operator a message like: " null : java.sql.SQLException: Try to insert null into a non-nullable column".
    Anyway, the first row is created in the directory and a new PK is given into ODI datastore. Curiously, this is not as i would presume the last PK value + 1.
    There are some kinds of gaps in the ID sequences.
    I even tried checking the "tolerated error" into the IKM step called "Insert new row". I'm using IKM shipped with ODI :"IKM SQL Incremental Update". The sequence is finished in operator but due, i guess, to the catched error, the other rows are not processed. (Anyway i shouldn't have to tolerate errors)
    I tried after to put not used custom PK values into my file, then map the PK column to the LDAP datastore PK column without much success: Only one row is processed. Futhermore, the id of the PK in the datastore is different of the one I put in the file.
    I finally tried to generate PK values through SQL instructions by creating new steps in the IKM modul but that did not worked much.
    I really do not see any other ideas to either have the driver construct new PK at insert/update or to make him ignore the null PK problem and process all the rows.
    If anyone do have an idea about it, please share...
    Greetings,
    Adrien

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue who is probably the same.
    using ODI 10.1.3.5, I can't insert new rows into my openLDAP.
    One of the point I see is that the execution take the LDAP server for staging area and want to create I$ table into it, so the data are already imported into the ldap Server.
    thanks for any help.

  • Not able to clear bank statement accounting entry with payment document.

    Hello FI guru,
    We are facing  problem to clear bank statement accounting entry with payment document  posted via t.code F110 (Automatic payment program).
    There is only single entry for payment in bank statment . But many entries in F110 for different vendors. Will posting the bank statement entry i.e Bank clear account Dr
                                        To Bank main account
    Its post with an error Error F5 263 the diference is too large.
    We are using muticash format & we have use 4 which clear Dr GL
    Request your help to resolve the problem Whether we missed any configuration or we have develop program for the same

    Hi,
    This error generally is due to tolerance error. Please check the assignment of the user id with the relevant tolerance groups. Let me know if it worked.
    or go through the following link
    F5 263 - The difference is too large for clearing
    BR,
    Satya

  • Lock Box - Cleared items (Urgent please)

    Hi all
    Can anyone please help me getting a report, to get the below information.
    1.How many customer invoices have been cleared through Lock Box Clearing program -- I wanted to findout how many customers have been cleared automatically (How can I findout this information - Tables/Field)
    2. How many customer invoices were not able to be cleared due to tolerance error through Lock Box clearing program
    Please help me in getting these detials
    Thanks
    Krishna

    Hello,
    1.How many customer invoices have been cleared through Lock Box Clearing program -- I wanted to findout how many customers have been cleared automatically (How can I findout this information - Tables/Field)
    You can sort this in table BSAD based on Doc type...Idenity whether your document posted via Lockbox program has unique ID...else you can identify from the table BKPF header records <fields TCODE & BLART>.
    Hope this helps
    Rgds
    Rajendra

  • In process Inspection and Rework Qty Issue

    Hi,
    There is Production Order for 100 qty.  There are 5 in process operations like 0010 Cutting, 0020 Welding, 0030 Inspection, 0040 turning, and 0050 Inspection
    (1)0010 operation is finished by production for 50 qty and confirmed through co11n by entering yield as 50 qty.
    (2)0020 operation is finished by production for 50 qty and confirmed through co11n by entering yield as 50 qty.
    (3)0030 operation: Quality inspected and entered results as 25 as yield and 25 as rework. For defects Q3 notification is
         triggered.( ie CO11N transaction is called in QM)
    (4)Production opened rework order CO07 and confirmed the rework operation and booked material and labor cost on cost
         center instead of orginal order.
    (5)0040: Operation production could confirm only 25 qty as earlier 0030 operation of inspection  yield was only 25 qty.
    (6)Inspection already in 0030 operation 25 qty  was entered as rework. Now after rework how results recording will be done 
         and qty will be posted in yield. Unless yield is entered under 0030 operation for 25 qty , production cannot confirm the 0040
         operation for pending 25qty.
    (7)Business requirement is what ever the qty production manufactures it has to be entered in system. Based on quality
         inspection incentive will be paid to only qty which is passed by quality.
    Settings Made:
    (a)100 Free Inspection, No Qty Relation, Quantity Valuation and Confirmation in Production for only inspection work center
         without any cost capturing.
    (b)Confirmation parameters settings with error for over and under delivery tolerance, error if inspection sequence not adhered,
         error message if no inspection results exists
    Any suggestion or any other way of handling this requirement.
    Thanks & Regards,
    RSR

    Hi RSR,
    Your way of mapping is absolutely fine, few points to be clear...
    03 inpection type and enable inspection characterisitics for operation 030
    04 inspeciton type to be enabled and operation 050 shall be eliminated if possible, material stock posting will be done from 04 inspection lot for 25 nos.
    let me know if you have questions..
    regards,
    Lenin. A

  • Locked threads, instead of hiding "reply" link change word to "Locked"

    Based on this thread: http://social.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/cc444c7a-a838-4a16-ac57-8f315475b602/how-does-one-reply-to-a-post-i-see-no-reply-button?forum=reportabug
    It seems that for locked threads, people can scroll past the the "Lock" icon too quickly to realize, and then not understand why they can't reply.  I
    Instead of hiding the reply link, I suggest changing the "reply" text to "Locked" for locked threads, and have it not be a hyperlink.
    Thanks,
    Mike
    MSDN and TechNet Subscriptions Support

    Your AGP bus uses more bandwith than the PCI bus, thus making the OC more dependend from the AGP bus. And if your AGP slot will drain more CPU power and fragile as AGP can be, it will not tolerate errors due higher clock speeds. Mhz += Stability -. Notice: PCI is 33 Mhz/ AGP is 66/133 Mhz... . As you see there is less margin for errors. While you overclock the CPU will make tolerable errors: NP with PCI... But AGP... will take it to the MAX. [I hope this reply is No nonsense]

  • Confirmation issue

    Dear Experts,
    Can anybody help me out in this..
    For an order type we have auto GI and auto GR at the time of confirmation.
    The task for me was to restrict the Exceeding of confirmation qty than the order qty..
    I have done that by OPk4, over delivery tolerance error and Termination for incorrect goods movements.
    But if i set this, the confirmation cannot be done even if GI is not done.i.e if the components is deficit of stock.
    THe requirement is partly done(for overdelivery.if i give the exact order qty,then only the system allows confirmation).
    the problem is if a material is in short of stock, it has to come in COGI.but in this case it is restricting the conf.
    what to do to get the material in COGI and to make the confirmation ...
    sap 125

    hi
    in OPK4 just remove the tick from Termination for incorrect goods movements.
    and then try
    This indicator enables you to terminate the confirmation in the event of incorrect items, for example, to prevent postprocessing records.
    thats means if this indicator is ticked then incorrect movemnts is termineted and not go into COGI
    regards
    Sachin

  • Broadband Sync Rate down

    Hey Guys,
    Since the upgade to 21CN I had been getting a pretty reliable sync of 11.5mb/s with download speeds of up to 10Mb/s. I recently switched to a new modem/router and when I did I discovered that I am now syncing at about 8.5Mb/s which is a bit of a drop. I only ever noticed one disconnect on the old router, so as far as I knew it was stable, but it (a Linksys) was very lacking in the connection stats front)
    I did have a mystery disconnect with the new router, however I was making changes to the Wi-Fi config at the time so it is concievable that the change caused the router firmware to reset the link for some reason.
    The new router gives better diagnostic stats.
    Router Stats are as follows:
    adslctl: ADSL driver and PHY status
    Status: Showtime
    Last Retrain Reason: 8000
    Last initialization procedure status: 0
    Max: Upstream rate = 1200 Kbps, Downstream rate = 9980 Kbps
    Bearer: 0, Upstream rate = 1191 Kbps, Downstream rate = 8820 Kbps
    Link Power State: L0
    Mode: ADSL2+
    TPS-TC: ATM Mode
    Trellis: UN /DN
    Line Status: No Defect
    Training Status: Showtime
    Down Up
    SNR (dB): 11.6 6.2
    Attn(dB): 35.5 18.9
    Pwr(dBm): 0.0 12.7
    Total time = 1 days 18 hours 11 min 51 sec
    FEC: 0 0
    CRC: 12821 503
    ES: 7711 376
    SES: 57 0
    UAS: 575 575
    LOS: 1 0
    LOF: 9 0
    LOM: 0 0
    Latest 15 minutes time = 11 min 51 sec
    FEC: 0 0
    CRC: 11 0
    ES: 9 0
    SES: 0 0
    UAS: 0 0
    LOS: 0 0
    LOF: 0 0
    LOM: 0 0
    Previous 15 minutes time = 15 min 0 sec
    FEC: 0 0
    CRC: 27 0
    ES: 20 0
    SES: 0 0
    UAS: 0 0
    LOS: 0 0
    LOF: 0 0
    LOM: 0 0
    Latest 1 day time = 18 hours 11 min 51 sec
    FEC: 0 0
    CRC: 1772 20
    ES: 1189 13
    SES: 3 0
    UAS: 0 0
    LOS: 0 0
    LOF: 0 0
    LOM: 0 0
    Previous 1 day time = 24 hours 0 sec
    FEC: 0 0
    CRC: 2861 90
    ES: 1600 70
    SES: 15 0
    UAS: 162 162
    LOS: 1 0
    LOF: 9 0
    LOM: 0 0
    Since Link time = 1 days 13 hours 33 min 5 sec
    FEC: 0 0
    CRC: 3536 93
    ES: 2452 73
    SES: 5 0
    UAS: 0 0
    LOS: 0 0
    LOF: 0 0
    LOM: 0 0
    Speed test results:
    1. Best Effort Test:  -provides background information.
    Download  Speed
    7.58 Mbps
    0 Mbps
    7.15 Mbps
    Max Achievable Speed
     Download speedachieved during the test was - 7.58 Mbps
     For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 2 Mbps-7.15 Mbps.
     IP Profile for your line is - 7.78 Mbps
    2. Upstream Test:  -provides background information.
    Upload Speed
    1.02 Mbps
    0 Mbps
    0.83 Mbps
    Max Achievable Speed
    Upload speed achieved during the test was - 1.02Mbps
     Additional Information:
     Upstream Rate IP profile on your line is - 0.83 Mbps
    I normally use a DSL faceplate in the master socket - there is no extension wiring (I disconnected it all when I put the faceplate in).
    The one thing that stands out is a steady trickle of CRC errors (typically 15-30 every 15 mins, with around 15-20 errored seconds), one question is if this would be considered a tolerable error rate? 

    imjolly wrote:
    if your router reports similar to my netgear then WAN time is not the same as pppoA internet connection time.  they are the same or close enough after a power reset but can be totally different if you have a drop in connection
    Interesting I had noticed a slight difference between the uptime figures after the connect but had not realised it could be potentially as misleading as that. This one is a DGND4300 - I also get the following from the Internet Port connection status page:
    Connection Time
    482:10:56
    Connection Status
    Connected
    Negotiation
    Success
    Authentication
    Success
    IP Address
    [REMOVED]
    Subnet Mask
    255.255.255.255
    And from the Satistics Page:
    Port
    Status
    TxPkts
    RxPkts
    Collisions
    Tx B/s
    Rx B/s
    Up Time
    WAN
    PPPoA
    7046479
    10885293
    0
    461
    579
    482:22:33
    LAN1
    Link down
    LAN2
    Link down
    LAN3
    Link down
    LAN4
    Link down
    WLAN b/g/n
    300M
    6987194
    4677493
    0
    235380
    86596
    03:23:53
    WLAN a/n
    450M
    8072428
    4527987
    0
    86442
    58345
    03:23:47
    ADSL Link
    Downstream
    Upstream
    Link Rate
    8291 Kbps
    1195 Kbps
    Line Attenuation
    36.0 dB
    18.9 dB
    Noise Margin
    11.7 dB
    6.1 dB
    Which backs up the 20days+ figure. I also checked the router log which only goes back to Feb 10, but there are no connection drops or reconnections logged in that time, so I guess at worst a min of 9 days continuous uptime. As a final datapoint the sync rate is the exact amount that I noted the last time it connected (after I inadvertantly knocked the PSU plug out ), which would tend to coroboratethe idea that there have been no retrains in the last 20 days.
    I was toying with the idea of letting it run another 10 days or so to see if it eventually does the right thing - and then force a retrain? But maybe it is time to ask the mods to give it a little prod to see if this new router can be as stable at the default noise margin. 

  • Overclocking my PT880 got best results with a PCI video card instead of a AGP card. Why?

    Hi guys,
    I posted a complete review of my PT880 OC experience at the "Overclocking section of the forum: thread post PT880 OC results" : https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?threadid=48006&sid=&threadview=0&hilight=&hilightuser=0&page=2
    Some days of test with my new PT880 board and I was able to run my P4 (B?) 2.4Ghz at 18 x 154 = 2772 Mhz. I got this speed using a cheap PCI card XFX GeForce 4 MX440, from my old P3 computer. I also got system to work with higher FSBs, but with some unstable sound board issues that I related on the link above.
    This week I decided to change the card to another same cheap XFX GeForce 4 MX440, but now a AGP 8x version. My surprise is that the system started to hang with just 20~30 seconds of use. Setting the front side bus to 133 helped to fix the stability issue. Playing a bit more I could OC using a 144 FSB, getting a final speed of 2592. Trying higher FSBs results in a unstable system again.
    This makes me wondering if the AGP/PCI is really locked. Using 144 FSB, it is supposed that an unlocked AGP port will be running at 72 Mhz, what is the limit for some AGP cards... My BIOS setup is using the AGP clock option at the default of 66Mhz. Is it really working at this speed?  
    If the AGP/PCI bus speed is really locked in this VIA PT880 MSI motherboard, why this difference in OC results when I change from a PCI to an AGP card (same manufacturer, same nvidia chipset) ? Will be the northbridge more occupied now?  
    My PC setup now:
    - MSI PT880 LSR with Bios upgraded to 1.4
    - Pentium 4(B? 533Mhz) 2.4Ghz
    - 512Mb DDR PC3200 NonECC ADATA Memory (just one module, so just single channel)
    - XFX GeForce4 MX440 AGP8x
    - Seagate 120Gb 7200RPM ATA100
    - Seagate 80Gb 7200RPM ATA100
    - Prolink PlayTV HD (conexant cx88)
    - Sound Blaster Live! 4.1
    - LG DVD-RW 4040b
    - 450W generic PSU
    That's all for now  

    Your AGP bus uses more bandwith than the PCI bus, thus making the OC more dependend from the AGP bus. And if your AGP slot will drain more CPU power and fragile as AGP can be, it will not tolerate errors due higher clock speeds. Mhz += Stability -. Notice: PCI is 33 Mhz/ AGP is 66/133 Mhz... . As you see there is less margin for errors. While you overclock the CPU will make tolerable errors: NP with PCI... But AGP... will take it to the MAX. [I hope this reply is No nonsense]

  • QM operation in Master Recipe

    Hi Experts,
    We maintain QM operations in the Master recipe along with PP operations.
    In my scenario - operations are maitained in following order
    1)QM operation 1
    2)PP operation 1
    3)QM operation 2
    4)QM operation 3
    5)PP operation 2
    Now untill and unless Quality validate the QM operation 1  , PP cant be able to confirm PP operation 1 .
    Same like in order for operation 2 and 3.
    Plz guide to map the scenarios.
    Regards
    saurabh

    Dear Saurabh
    You need to make the Sequencing also mandatory
    in OPK4> For order type plant > in Generally valid settings maintain under Operation sequence > Error when operation sequence is not adhered to
    By this it makes the operation 10 to be confirmed for operation 20 to be confirmed
    Also make the overdelivery tolerance -  error when overdelivery tolerance is exceeded
    Regards
    Gajesh

  • Signal analysis for DAQ

    Hello,
    what is the easiest way in performing signal analysis on a signal from a DAQ device?
    For example if i can obtain a sine wave signal from a DAQ ,how can i program labview to give me a indication if the signal is correct ie. sine wave, ampltude, frequency, etc etc
     with the option of setting the error of eg. 3%
    and also if the curve is unorthordox, can you plot points if the ideal signal, to determine and compare it to the signal obtained from the DAQ and say if it is ok ? with the option of error.

    Hi Labviewwuser3,
    Good afternoon and I hope your well. Thanks for your post.
    You have many options to analyses your signal.
    The easiest is maybe an express VI called Equal, it allows you test if two waveforms are the same, greater, less and within tolerance (error).
    More in depth you could use some of the VIs in the maths>> Signal processing >>Signal Operation such as peak detection. You could then compare the locations of peaks and amplitude. 
    You could also do this on a point by point basses or on a complete waveform...
    Hope this helps to get you started, 
    Message Edited by Hillman on 12-18-2008 01:31 PM
    Kind Regards
    James Hillman
    Applications Engineer 2008 to 2009 National Instruments UK & Ireland
    Loughborough University UK - 2006 to 2011
    Remember Kudos those who help!

  • Carrier in Fico

    Dear Sirs,
    I have finish my Graduate in Commerce in 2000( BCOM), after that i warok as jr Account for 1 year2001 to 2002.
    then after that i work with Life Insurance Companies like Bajaj, Kotak and Reliance Life Insurance as an Operation Manager.
    I have sound knowledge in Operation Management, i am in to Manager rank.
    As i have solid domain Knowledge,
    i want to enter in IT sector as a FI/Co Functional Consultant,
    iam good at FI part.
    pls suggest, how to mold my carrier.

    Dear Sir,
    I need  help, actually ,i get vey little time for practise fico,
    while posting entry in f-02, getting error  tolerance error, range amount or tolerance  not assigned,
    where as i have assign in TC obA4,ob57, then also i am getting error,
    in oba4 , i have given group then company id,amount per document and amount per open item, but still error,
    without group its not saving,
    because of this error my practise got stop, pls help me out to over come this problem.
    i know this is not correct forum, pls update me with correct forum too
    pls advise,
    Edited by: mujju05 on Mar 22, 2011 3:41 PM

  • Tolerance Limits - Error message: SV033

    Hi Guys,
    I am trying to add a new entry on  the below transaction:
    IMG - Material Managment - Logistics Invoice Verification - Invoice Block - Set Tolerance Limits
    But I got the error message: SV033 - "Specify the key within the work area".
    Does anyone know how can I procede in this case?
    Thanks
    Daniel

    That's a pretty odd message.  Are you getting it when you enter the TCode? Upon saving? I'd check OSS and create a ticket if you can't find anything.

Maybe you are looking for