Tor resolves ip address using port 80 [SOLVED]

Hey everyone,
I'm trying to provide a service to fellow internet users that don't like their internet traffic to be snooped on. To explain my situation I'll tell something about my setup.
I use a router to access the internet. I let a router set up a vpn connection to my vpn provider. Then I tell it, using iptables, to redirect all http and https traffic through the VPN tunnel and let all other traffic go over the standard WAN. Not entirely true, I also redirect all udp and icmp traffic through the vpn tunnel.
I have a server that I want to act as the TOR relay. I want it to use the WAN acces and not go over the VPN. This makes sure I don't burden my vpn provider with a bunch of traffic that can just use my WAN acces.
When setting up the TOR relay I use port 4436 as the relay port and port 9030 as the Directory port. My router directs all this traffic over the WAN. I also port forward these ports in the router towards the server.
The TOR relay seems to work but not entirely. I have the following message log: (I have replaced the ip addresses that belong to my WAN and VPN tunnel with "<wan-ip>" and "<vpn-ip>" to make it clearer. )
sep 04 17:29:48.164 [Notice] Self-testing indicates your DirPort is reachable from the outside. Excellent.
sep 04 17:35:08.532 [Notice] Our IP Address has changed from <wan-ip> to <vpn-ip>; rebuilding descriptor (source: 154.35.32.5).
sep 04 17:35:09.883 [Notice] Self-testing indicates your ORPort is reachable from the outside. Excellent. Publishing server descriptor.
sep 04 17:55:08.476 [Warning] Your server (<vpn-ip>:9030) has not managed to confirm that its DirPort is reachable. Please check your firewalls, ports, address, /etc/hosts file, etc.
sep 04 18:15:08.476 [Warning] Your server (<vpn-ip>:9030) has not managed to confirm that its DirPort is reachable. Please check your firewalls, ports, address, /etc/hosts file, etc.
sep 04 18:26:44.664 [Notice] Our IP Address has changed from <vpn-ip> to <wan-ip>; rebuilding descriptor (source: 128.31.0.34).
sep 04 18:26:45.117 [Notice] Our IP Address has changed from <wan-ip> to <vpn-ip>; rebuilding descriptor (source: 194.109.206.212).
sep 04 18:26:49.342 [Notice] Our IP Address has changed from <vpn-ip> to <wan-ip>; rebuilding descriptor (source: 76.73.17.194).
sep 04 18:26:58.255 [Notice] Self-testing indicates your ORPort is reachable from the outside. Excellent. Publishing server descriptor.
sep 04 18:33:01.221 [Notice] Self-testing indicates your DirPort is reachable from the outside. Excellent.
sep 04 18:36:52.096 [Notice] Our IP Address has changed from <wan-ip> to <vpn-ip>; rebuilding descriptor (source: 212.112.245.170).
sep 04 18:37:10.626 [Notice] Self-testing indicates your ORPort is reachable from the outside. Excellent. Publishing server descriptor.
sep 04 18:56:51.965 [Warning] Your server (<vpn-ip>:9030) has not managed to confirm that its DirPort is reachable. Please check your firewalls, ports, address, /etc/hosts file, etc.
sep 04 19:16:51.967 [Warning] Your server (<vpn-ip>:9030) has not managed to confirm that its DirPort is reachable. Please check your firewalls, ports, address, /etc/hosts file, etc.
sep 04 19:27:44.011 [Notice] Our IP Address has changed from <vpn-ip> to <wan-ip>; rebuilding descriptor (source: 128.31.0.34).
sep 04 19:27:44.092 [Notice] Our IP Address has changed from <wan-ip> to <vpn-ip>; rebuilding descriptor (source: 171.25.193.9).
sep 04 19:27:44.095 [Notice] Our IP Address has changed from <vpn-ip> to <wan-ip>; rebuilding descriptor (source: 128.31.0.34).
sep 04 19:27:44.098 [Notice] Our IP Address has changed from <wan-ip> to <vpn-ip>; rebuilding descriptor (source: 194.109.206.212).
sep 04 19:27:50.211 [Notice] Our IP Address has changed from <vpn-ip> to <wan-ip>; rebuilding descriptor (source: 76.73.17.194).
sep 04 19:27:55.398 [Notice] Self-testing indicates your DirPort is reachable from the outside. Excellent.
sep 04 19:28:08.914 [Notice] Self-testing indicates your ORPort is reachable from the outside. Excellent. Publishing server descriptor.
sep 04 19:29:45.764 [Warning] We just marked ourself as down. Are your external addresses reachable?
sep 04 19:37:51.966 [Notice] Our IP Address has changed from <wan-ip> to <vpn-ip>; rebuilding descriptor (source: 212.112.245.170).
sep 04 19:37:55.358 [Notice] Self-testing indicates your ORPort is reachable from the outside. Excellent. Publishing server descriptor.
What I think will fix the problem is that TOR should not resolve my ip address using http or https since that will provide the wrong ip address. When trying to access that ip address at another port (in this case 9030) will obviously not work. However there is no setting to do that. Is there any way to archieve this?
Please ask if anything is unclear.
Regards,
Berend
--edit--
I was able to set the Address field in the torrc file. This means I can hardcode the ipaddress I want it to use (WAN). However that address can change every 6 months or so. If someone has a better solution that would be very welcome.
Last edited by Berend (2013-09-05 00:47:25)

Berend wrote:@progandy
I don't have any experience with that.
I guess I can tag them with a TOS so my router knows what to do with it. But how would I give that tag?
Select the packtes with owner and then depending on what your router supports you can set either DSCP or TOS. dscp is the current standard, tos is deprecated.

Similar Messages

  • To know IP address and port no using DB Link

    Hi -
    Is it possiable to know the IP address and port no of other oracle database that are connected with DB link. i.e for example
    we have 2 oracle databases(For example A and B and it's schemas are A_A and B_B) on two different IP address and DB link is created on B database i.e using B_B user to access A database i.e A_A user. Now By using A database i.e A_A user can we know the IP and PORT NO of database B?

    user4587979 wrote:
    Hi -
    Is it possiable to know the IP address and port no of other oracle database that are connected with DB link. i.e for example
    we have 2 oracle databases(For example A and B and it's schemas are A_A and B_B) on two different IP address and DB link is created on B database i.e using B_B user to access A database i.e A_A user. Now By using A database i.e A_A user can we know the IP and PORT NO of database B?you can also know the ip address and port number by tnsping command.
    $tnsping B
    eg:-
    C:\Documents and Settings\rajesh-kg>tnsping TESTDB
    TNS Ping Utility for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on 07-JUN-2
    011 18:44:48
    Copyright (c) 1997, 2005, Oracle.  All rights reserved.
    Used parameter files:
    D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\db_2\network\admin\sqlnet.ora
    Used TNSNAMES adapter to resolve the alias
    Attempting to contact (DESCRIPTION = (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = xxxxxxxxxx)(PORT = 1521)) (CONNECT_DATA = (SERVER = DEDICATED) (SER
    VICE_NAME = testdb)))
    OK (50 msec)

  • How to determine which IP address and port is used to make DNS queries?

    I am using JNDI/DNS API to query a Enum server (Tel URI resolution in VOIP world) what is a DNS server.
    But I have many network interfaces, in a VLAN environment, and I must to specify from which interface (and port)
    all the requests are sent.
    When I read the code of JNDI/DNS API (in JDK 1.5) and specially the DNSClient class, I can see that the
    DatagramSocket is created without parameters... : udpSocket = new DatagramSocket();
    How can I specify the IP address and port to use for my client???
    Thanks for your help.

    I must to specify from which interface (and port) all the requests are sent. You don't have to specify the interface unless your static unicast routing tables are incorrect, and you never have to specify the port unless some lunatic is in control of your firewall.

  • Getting this message when trying to access our cameras, how to fix? This address is restricted This address uses a network port which is normally...

    Just installed Firefox for my boss, and ran into something I've not seen before. When trying to access our private camera system, that uses specific ports, I got this message: "This address is restricted - This address uses a network port which is normally used for purposes other than Web browsing. Firefox has canceled the request for your protection."
    Cannot find a setting in Firefox to correct this problem. Please help.

    Hello,
    Can you please check if either of these links help in the resolution of the issue
    # [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Network.security.ports.banned.override Firefox ports override]
    #[http://blog.christoffer.me/post/2012-02-20-how-to-remove-firefoxs-this-address-is-restricted/ Remove Firefox this address is restricted error]
    Thank you

  • UCM 10g - default page after login - using port 80 instead of 443

    Hi,
    We have old instance of UCM 10g, which we have to move to new servers. I made the filesystem move + configuration of IIS (we use IIS as webserver).
    We use clustered mode - 2 UCM application servers, 2 IIS servers. We have a load balancers for IIS servers and a load balancer for UCM app servers. IIS itself listens on pure http 80 port. We access UCM via dns name which is resolved as a loadbalancer for IIS IP address. This loadbalancer forwards pure http (80) to IIS servers.
    Everything works for me except on thing: Once user log in, there should be default page displayed, where simple search form appears. There I am getting:
    "Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at ucm.our.domain:80."
    I do not know why does it use port 80. Once I am logged in, when I click "Home" Link then the simple search screen appears correctly. So the problem is only with page displayed after log in.
    I am tired for reading config files, trying to change/add some parameter and I am stuck here.
    I would really appreciate some help. Any ideas from anybody?
    Edited by: stando on Jul 9, 2012 5:19 AM
    Edited by: stando on Jul 9, 2012 5:19 AM

    Hi Hendrick,
    Its a common problem i did face it.
    one of the following link can guide you.
    How do I enable Java in my web browser?
    Solving Common Applet Problems (The Java&amp;trade; Tutorials &amp;gt; Deployment &amp;gt; Java Apple…
    Please let me know still if you face any issue..
    Thanks,
    Rajendar Pilli.

  • The attempt to connect to the server (IP address) on port 443 failed - OLT

    Hi all
    I am facing one problem, if i run load to any application for 100 users for 1 iteration then it is not showing any error. Lets say i ran the load of 100 users for one hour then for some users there are errors like
    Line: (script.java:84)][ScriptException]: The attempt to connect to the server (IP address) on port 443 failed.
    And my understanding is the user's which are facing failures is not able to get response or page loaded at their end. As failures are occuring for some particular steps not the entire scenario. Pls confirm.
    Thanks

    I believe that's an indication that there is an error receiving mail, but if you have any drafts or email in your outgoing mailbox, try deleting them.  Apple's troubleshooting steps for this are (from http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4002):
    Cannot receive mail in OS X Mail
    If you use OS X Mail, look at the name of your iCloud account on the left side of the main Mail window. If your iCloud account name is dim and has a lightning bolt next to it, your account is offline. To resolve this, make sure your computer is connected to the Internet. Then choose Go Online from the Mailbox menu.
    If taking your iCloud account online doesn't resolve the issue, follow these steps:
    From the Mail menu, choose Preferences.
    In the Preferences window, click the Accounts tab if it is not already selected.
    In the Accounts list, select your iCloud email address.
    Click the Account Information tab.
    Verify your SMTP server settings with the following information:
    Incoming Mail Server: imap.mail.me.com
    User Name: Your iCloud email address
    Password: Your iCloud password
    Click the Advanced tab and verify the following additional settings:
    Port: 993
    Use Secure Sockets Layer (SSL): Should be enabled
    Authentication: Password

  • Can't add a Linux computer, failed to resolve IP address.

    I have a Linux computer on workgroup, SCOM on a domain, when I try to add the Linux computer to SCOM, the Discovery Wizard send me a an error: "Unable to discovery"
    I put the IP address on the Discovery Scope, I set the credentials with User name and password of root, select the pool and  when try to discovery, the Wizard send me a message: "Undiscoverable addresses, Reason: DNS configuration, Details:"Failed
    to resolve IP address (x.x.x.x) to name.
    x

    SCOM needs the name when it generates the certificate for the SSL connection. You can work around this by adding the hostname of the Linux computer to your hosts file with the IP address on the SCOM server.
    - On the Linux server run the 'hostname' cmd. You will use this in the hosts file on the SCOM server.
    - On the SCOM server edit the C:\Windows\System32\Drivers\etc\hosts file and add the following:
    <IP Address of Linux server> <hostname or Linux server>
    Run the Discovery Wizard again and it should work. Note that you also need to make sure port 1270 is open on the Linux server.
    Regards,
    -Steve

  • How do I use Port Mapping?

    b How do I use Port Mapping?
    (This document will assume that you are using and ABS/AEBS/AX as an internet router and have DHCP & NAT turned on.)
    Sometime you may want to offer access to a computer on your AirPort network to users on the internet, whether it be a web site, or for file sharing, or just remote access for yourself when traveling. If any of these sound like something you want to do, then you need to understand how Port Mapping works.
    b AirPort as Firewall
    Most of the time your AirPort base station will not let any traffic into your network which did not originate from your network. It will let everything out and replies to your traffic back in, but it will not let sessions initiated on the internet side of the base station in to your network. This is what is referred to as the "NAT firewall" capability of the base station and it provides effective protection for your network from the internet. What Port Mapping does is poke a hole in this wall to allow certain type(s) of traffic into the network and direct this traffic to a specific computer on the network. In the firewall world this is commonly referred to as an "inbound proxy" or "inbound translation" rule or "PAT" (Port Address Translation) in the router world.
    b The Need for Manual Addressing
    Since a Port Mapping entry in the base station configuration requires an inside private IP address to be specified, the computer to which to mapping entry applies should always have the IP address specified in the mapping entry. Thus, DHCP should not be used for a computer offering services on the internet as the Port Mapping entry will no longer work if the target computer's IP address changes. In general, an Apple base station's DHCP server will try to assign IP addresses in the 10.0.1.2 to 10.0.1.200 range. IP addresses above 10.0.1.200 can be Manually assigned to computers and other devices on the network up to 10.0.1.254. 10.0.1.255 is reserved (it is the broadcast address for the 10.0.1 subnet). To Manually set up the TCP/IP information for a Macintosh running Mac OS X, go to System Preferences -> Network and "Show" the appropriate interface (Ethernet or AirPort) and click on the TCP/IP tab. Select "Configure Manually" and enter the following information:
    IP address : 10.0.1.201 (or whatever address you decide to use)
    Subnet mask : 255.255.255.0
    Router IP : 10.0.1.1 (the AirPort base station LAN IP)
    DNS server : 10.0.1.1, or whatever DNS server IP your ISP uses
    After making these changes verify that your computer can still access the internet and local resources on the LAN before continuing.
    b Port Mapping a service
    In our example we will be hosting a web site on a computer which we have given an IP address of 10.0.1.201. Basic web sites are accessed using the HyperText Transport Protocol (HTTP) and this protocol typically uses port 80 to communicate. In order for others to see the web site, we must configure a Port Mapping entry in the base station configuration to not only allow the web browsers in, but to tell the base station what IP address the web server is using. The Port Mapping entry has three parts: Public Port, Private IP, and Private Port. In this case you would use the following values:
    Public Port : 80
    Private IP : 10.0.1.201 (this is the computer hosting the web site)
    Private Port : 80
    In order to access the web site from the internet, users must reference the base station's WAN port public IP (determined by looking at the base station configuration summary page in the AirPort Admin Utility). Since this address may change over time, you might want to use a Dynamic DNS service to simplify connecting for your users.
    Sometimes the port you wish to use may be blocked by the ISP. In this case, use a different non-standard Public Port number for the service, but keep the Private Port standard. In the above example, if the ISP was blocking port 80, you could potentially use 8080 instead, so:
    Public Port :

    Public Port : 8080
    Private IP : 10.0.1.201
    Private Port : 80
    Your users would then have to enter "http://<publicIP>:8080/" (where <publicIP> is the public IP address of the AirPort base station) to access the web site.
    b Internal Access
    It should be noted that when accessing these services from within the network you cannot reference the Public IP/Public Port, but rather you must use the Private IP/Private Port. Thus, "http://10.0.1.201:80/" in the above example.
    b Limits and Options
    There is a maximum of 20 Port Mapping entries that can be made in an Apple base station configuration. If you use an AirPort Extreme or AirPort Express base station there is an option which can be helpful in the case where you need many ports opened to a single computer. This is the "Default Host" option. When using this it is not necessary to use Port Mapping at all as all ports will be opened to the specified "Default Host". This is found in "Base Station Options". The default IP address for the "Default Host" is 10.0.1.253. You may change this IP address. The target computer must be Manually configured as specified above with the same IP address. Since all ports are now open to this computer, you should enable and configure the Mac OS X firewall on the default host computer to protect it from intruders.
    b Useful Related Links
    <a href="http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=52002>"Designing AirPort Extreme Networks: Manuals</a>
    "Well Known" TCP and UDP Ports Used By Apple Software Products
    IANA Port Number Assignments

  • Coherence::net::messaging::ConnectionException: could not establish a connection to one of the following addresses: {10.242.152.242/10.242.152.242:8088}; make sure the "remote-addresses" configuration element contains an address and port of a running TcpA

    Hi
    I have installed coheI have installed coherence server "fmw_12.1.3.0.0_coherence_Disk1_1of1.zip" along with Examples on windows machine and C++ client coherence-cpp-12.1.3.0.0b51709-windows-x86-vs2012.zip on the same machine.
    I have built the "contacts" C++ Example successfully and while I execute this "contacts" using run I am facing TcpAcceptor error.
    On my coherence server the TcpAcceptor is listening on port 8088, so I have modified the extend-cache-config.xml file with values "ip address of my windows machine" and port as "8088".
    All the time I am getting below error,
    coherence::net::messaging::ConnectionException: could not establish a connection to one of the following addresses: {10.242.152.242/10.242.152.242:8088}; make sure the "remote-addresses" configuration element contains an address and port of a running TcpAcceptor
        at class coherence::lang::TypedHandle<class coherence::component::net::extend::PofConnection> __thiscall coherence::component::util::TcpInitiator::openConne
    ction(void)(TcpInitiator.cpp:307)
        at coherence::component::util::TcpInitiator::openConnection
        at coherence::component::util::Initiator::ensureConnection
        at coherence::component::net::extend::RemoteCacheService::openChannel
        at coherence::component::net::extend::RemoteService::doStart
        at coherence::component::net::extend::RemoteService::start
        at coherence::component::util::SafeService::startService
        at coherence::component::util::SafeService::restartService
        at coherence::component::util::SafeService::ensureRunningServiceInternal
        at coherence::component::util::SafeService::start
        at coherence::net::DefaultConfigurableCacheFactory::configureService
        at coherence::net::DefaultConfigurableCacheFactory::ensureService
        at coherence::net::DefaultConfigurableCacheFactory::ensureRemoteCache
        at coherence::net::DefaultConfigurableCacheFactory::configureCache
        at coherence::net::DefaultConfigurableCacheFactory::ensureCache
        at coherence::net::CacheFactory::getCache
        at unsigned __int64 coherence::lang::class_spec<class coherence::lang::Managed<class ContactId>,class coherence::lang::extends<class coherence::lang::Object,class coherence::lang::Void<class coherence::lang::Object> >,class coherence::lang::implements<void,void,void,void,void,void,void,void,void,void,void,void,void,void,void,void> >::sizeOf(bool)
        at _onexit
        at class coherence::util::Hashtable * coherence::lang::factory<class coherence::util::Hashtable>::create(void)
        at class coherence::util::Hashtable * coherence::lang::factory<class coherence::util::Hashtable>::create(void)
        at BaseThreadInitThunk
        at RtlInitializeExceptionChain
        at RtlInitializeExceptionChain
        on thread "main"
    Caused by: coherence::net::messaging::ConnectionException: coherence::component::util::TcpInitiator::TcpConnection@029EAD78{Id=NULL, Open=1, LocalAddress=NULL,
    RemoteAddress=10.242.152.242/10.242.152.242:8088}: socket disconnect
        at class coherence::lang::TypedHandle<class coherence::net::messaging::Response> __thiscall coherence::component::net::extend::AbstractPofRequest::Status::g
    etResponse(void)(AbstractPofRequest.cpp:203)
        at coherence::component::net::extend::AbstractPofRequest::Status::getResponse
        at coherence::component::net::extend::AbstractPofRequest::Status::waitForResponse
        at coherence::component::util::Initiator::openConnection
        at coherence::component::net::extend::PofConnection::open
        at coherence::component::util::TcpInitiator::openConnection
        at coherence::component::util::Initiator::ensureConnection
        at coherence::component::net::extend::RemoteCacheService::openChannel
        at coherence::component::net::extend::RemoteService::doStart
        at coherence::component::net::extend::RemoteService::start
        at coherence::component::util::SafeService::startService
        at coherence::component::util::SafeService::restartService
        at coherence::component::util::SafeService::ensureRunningServiceInternal
        at coherence::component::util::SafeService::start
        at coherence::net::DefaultConfigurableCacheFactory::configureService
        at coherence::net::DefaultConfigurableCacheFactory::ensureService
        at coherence::net::DefaultConfigurableCacheFactory::ensureRemoteCache
        at coherence::net::DefaultConfigurableCacheFactory::configureCache
        at coherence::net::DefaultConfigurableCacheFactory::ensureCache
        at coherence::net::CacheFactory::getCache
        at unsigned __int64 coherence::lang::class_spec<class coherence::lang::Managed<class ContactId>,class coherence::lang::extends<class coherence::lang::Object
    ,class coherence::lang::Void<class coherence::lang::Object> >,class coherence::lang::implements<void,void,void,void,void,void,void,void,void,void,void,void,void
    ,void,void,void> >::sizeOf(bool)
        at _onexit
        at class coherence::util::Hashtable * coherence::lang::factory<class coherence::util::Hashtable>::create(void)
        at class coherence::util::Hashtable * coherence::lang::factory<class coherence::util::Hashtable>::create(void)
        at BaseThreadInitThunk
        at RtlInitializeExceptionChain
        at RtlInitializeExceptionChain
        on thread "main"
    Caused by: coherence::io::IOException: socket disconnect
        at unsigned int __thiscall coherence::net::Socket::readInternal(unsigned char *,unsigned int)(Socket.cpp:333)
        at coherence::net::Socket::readInternal
        at coherence::net::Socket::SocketInput::read
        at coherence::io::BufferedInputStream::fillBuffer
        at coherence::io::BufferedInputStream::read
        at coherence::component::util::TcpInitiator::readMessageLength
        at coherence::component::util::TcpInitiator::TcpConnection::TcpReader::onNotify
        at coherence::component::util::Daemon::run
        at coherence::lang::Thread::run
        on thread "ExtendTcpCacheService:coherence::component::util::TcpInitiator:coherence::component::util::TcpInitiator::TcpConnection::TcpReader"

    We are facing same issue.    Could you please provide us any working .Net sample code for the version 12.1.2.0.
    <ssl>
                  <protocol>Tls</protocol>
                  <local-certificates>
                    <certificate>
                      <url>c:\Cert\</url>
                      <password>password</password>
                      <flags>DefaultKeySet</flags>
                    </certificate>
                  </local-certificates>
                </ssl>
    thanks
    Bala

  • Using one public ip for ssh`ing to different internal servers using port-redirections

    Hi, we are having a requirement to use the same public IP to ssh into different internal servers using port re-direction. So lets say from outside, if a user does ssh @ root 4.4.4.4 2222, it should go to a sshsrv1 and then ssh @ root 4.4.4.4 2223 to sshsrv2
    My config is like this:-
    object network sshsrv1
    host 10.110.100.10
    nat (inside,Outside) static 4.4.4.4 service tcp 22 2222
    And then i allowed the object "sshsrv1" in my inbound acl from outside.
    It dosen`t seem to work. Is this doeable?
    Any suggestions??

    Hi,
    Would need to see your NAT configurations.
    There is a possibility that you have a NAT configuration that might be preventing this from working. Then again you are using an extra public IP address for this so it seems strange.
    Could you try the "packet-tracer" command
    packet-tracer input outside tcp 12345 2222
    This should tell us if there is some problem in the ASA configurations.
    - Jouni

  • Can't resolve .local address on Windows Vista 64 bit

    I have Windows Vista 64 bit edition and installed Bonjour 64 bit.
    From my Internet Explorer Bonjour toolbar, I can see my Bonjour device. However, when I try to connect to it, I get a DNS error.
    Any suggestions? I've tried disabling firewalls and antivirus.

    The problem appears to be in 32 bit programs. The 64 bit version of IE can resolve .local addresses, but 32 bit programs can't. I can map a network drive using the address as well.
    Oddly, my version of Safari can "see" the .local device and lists it, but it can't connect because it can't actually resolve the address.

  • Essbase1113 IP Address and Port Questions

    hello,
    everyone, i'm puzzled on a question about essbase.
    it'll be so kind if you give me some suggestions.
    in our project, we install EMP System 1113 on Win Server2003, but it's in local network. there is no problem when we connect it using client tools in local network environment.
    however, we wanna connect the Essbase Server through Internet, we map the server address (such as 10.163.163.163) as an Internet address (such as 111.111.111.111).
    we didn't use VPN such tools, and, the address is just a mapping, if we don't map the port, we couldn't connect the essbase server.
    here comes the question, how do we map the essbase address and port ? i mean which port should we use, so that we could connect it through Internet ?
    thank you so much.
    wish to reply.
    hawk.

    The ports that essbase use are outlined at :- http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12825_01/epm.111/epm_install_start_here/ch06s05s01.html
    Cheers
    John
    http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

  • Design help related to ACE to Switch connectivity using Port-Channel

    Hi,
    I have a Cisco ACE 4710 configured in One-Arm mode. This ACE is getting connected with 2 3750 switches. These 2 3750 switches connected in trunk mode.
    ACE is connected to these 3750 switches using Port-channel.
    ACE Config:
    ================================
    interface gigabitEthernet 1/1
      description One-arm mode port to DMZ Switch 1 port 20
      channel-group 1
      no shutdown
    interface gigabitEthernet 1/2
      description One-arm mode port to DMZ Switch 2 port 20
      channel-group 1
      no shutdown
    interface port-channel 1
      switchport access vlan 51
      port-channel load-balance src-dst-ip
      no shutdown
    interface vlan 51
      ip address 10.40.56.131 255.255.255.128
      access-group input everyone
      access-group output everyone
      nat-pool 1 10.40.56.215 10.40.56.215 netmask 255.255.255.255 pat
      service-policy input LB
      service-policy input remote-access
      no shutdown
    ===========================================================
    The problem is that 3750 switches are not stacked.
    Application is working fine. But i am getting a lot of MAC flapping messages..
    kindly suggest whether this design is OK or something needs to be done to rectify it...
    Attached a small diagram..

    Hello acharyr123,
    I don't think this design is ok, and it would cause mac flapping since the two indepedendent 3750 switches will learn the ace mac addresses off of two different interfaces.  The 3750s would have to be stacked so that they would act as one switch then this should work correctly.
    Thanks
    Joel Lamousnery
    TAC CSE

  • Changing the multicast Address and Port giving error

    I am using Coherence 3.3.1 jar files (Coherence.jar and tangosol.jar) in my local application. But when I try to change the multicast Address and Port in tangosole-coherence.xml(in Coherence.jar) then it is giving this error -
    "This member could not join the cluster because of an incompatibility between the cluster protocol used by this member and the one being used by the rest of the cluster. This is most likely caused by a Coherence version mismatch, or by mismatched protocol filters (e.g. compression, or encryption)"
    If i am using unique IP and Port then how can it be in a Cluster as this error stating. Please reply ASAP.

    Hi,
    There is a good chance that there is already the IP and port is being used by another cluster (which uses different versions of jars or configurations) and hence, when you are starting your cluster, throwing the error.
    Can you double check if another cluster is already using it or not ?
    Thanks,
    Amit

  • [nQSError: 77030] Oracle BI Presentation Server Connection Error: Unable to resolve the address for cn.

    Hi Experts,
    When I use Agent functionality to send email in BIEE 11.1.1.7.0, it will generate the following error message as below:  Are you facing the same problem ? Please help me,Thanks very much.
    Global Error: [nQSError: 77030] Oracle BI Presentation Server Connection Error: Unable to resolve the address for cn.
    Error Codes: AXSBMN8D:
    The operation completed successfully.

    Can you try doing telnet to SMTP server from where BI server is installed and let us know the outcome.Just want to check if any firewall is blocking
    telnet hostname portnumber
    Thanks,

Maybe you are looking for