Transaction not committed

Hi
how can i find transaction not committed? I cannot find in v$lock, but i want find first transaction, which is not committed and block others.
Any ideas?
Thanks

Use v$transaction view to check uncomiited transactions.
See here it's already discussed:
Re: How to query uncommited transactions
Locked objects can find with this select:
select
c.owner,
c.object_name,
c.object_type,
b.sid,
b.serial#,
b.status,
b.osuser,
b.machine
from
v$locked_object a ,
v$session b,
dba_objects c
where
b.sid = a.session_id
and
a.object_id = c.object_id;

Similar Messages

Records Not Commiting - PLSQL Block

Hi,
Good Day to all..
DECLARE
v_annotation_id_1   VARCHAR2(200):='101';
v_annotation_type_1 VARCHAR2(200):='OMG';
v_j                 NUMBER;
v_user_id_string    VARCHAR2(200);
v_user_id           NUMBER;
BEGIN
FOR v_j IN 1..2
LOOP
    SELECT MAX(TRUNC(NVL(user_id,0)))
    INTO v_user_id_string
    FROM TABLE_XXX;
    v_user_id:= to_number(trim(v_user_id_string))+1;
    dbms_output.put_line('v_user_id_string-->'||v_user_id_string);
    dbms_output.put_line('v_user_id-->'||v_user_id);
    INSERT
    INTO TABLE_XXX
        TTT_annotation_id,
        user_id,
        digital_package_id,
        annotation_id,
        time_code,
        annotation_type,
        created_date,
        created_by
      VALUES
        seq_TTT_annotation_id.nextval,
        v_user_id,
        1004,
        v_annotation_id_1,
        100,
        v_annotation_type_1,
        sysdate,
        'TTTService'
       dbms_output.put_line('v_user_id 1 -->'||v_user_id);
    INSERT
    INTO TABLE_XXX
        TTT_annotation_id,
        user_id,
        digital_package_id,
        annotation_id,
        time_code,
        annotation_type,
        created_date,
        created_by
      VALUES
        seq_TTT_annotation_id.nextval,
        v_user_id,
        1004,
        v_annotation_id_1,
        100,
        v_annotation_type_1,
        sysdate,
        'TTTService'
      dbms_output.put_line('v_user_id 2 -->'||v_user_id);
     COMMIT;
     DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('SQL%ROWCOUNT -->'||SQL%ROWCOUNT);
END LOOP;
COMMIT;
END;
Sample Output
v_user_id_string-->100002828932367
v_user_id-->100002828932368
v_user_id 1 -->100002828932368
v_user_id 2 -->100002828932368
SQL%ROWCOUNT -->0
v_user_id_string-->100002828932368
v_user_id-->100002828932369
v_user_id 1 -->100002828932369
v_user_id 2 -->100002828932369
SQL%ROWCOUNT -->0
TABLE_XXX --> Primary Key - TTT_annotation_id NOT NULL Datatype: NUMBER
Data is not getting committed; when i checked the SQL%ROWCOUNT it shows "0".
I have no idea why it is not commiting the data.
All the sessions are either COMMITTED or ROLLBACK.
Thanks for reply....

You are over committing.
SQL> create table t (n number);
Table created.
SQL> set serverout on
SQL> begin
2    insert into t values (1);
3    dbms_output.put_line ('Rows inserted: '|| sql%rowcount);
4 end;
5 /
Rows inserted: 1
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> edi
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 begin
2    insert into t values (1);
3    commit;
4    dbms_output.put_line ('Rows inserted: '|| sql%rowcount);
5* end;
SQL> /
Rows inserted: 0
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.Commit ends the current transaction and will result in subsequent sql%rowcount being zero.

Financial transaction and commitment item category

Hello,
Can any one suggest what financial transaction and commitment item category can be used when creating the following commitment items:
u2022     Value added tax (VAT)
u2022     tax on profits
u2022     before-tax income
u2022     nett income
u2022     net financial result
And moreover, should such a commitment items be created?
Thanks
Irina

Hi Irina,
As I said, the real question is whether you are going to use these commitment items for budget management. If not, it does not really matter if it will be defined 50/2 or 50/3 - in any case, the AVC will not be applied to these lines. It's not even necessary to define a separate commitment item for these G/Ls; it's possible to define one dummy commitment item for all transactions which are not relevant for budget activities.
Regards,
Eli

Financial Transactions in commitment item

Hi Gurus
We are facing this error while entering the Goods receipt i.e MIGO
Transaction for a import materail while trying to save the MIGO we are
getting the error " Posting not Possible;Incorrect financial
transactions of commitment item" We tried to change the financial
transactions but still the system is showing the same error and not
allowing us to save the MIGO.
Please suggest some solution as it is very urgent issue and affecting our business operations.
Regards
chetan

Hi,
Use t.code: FS00 and check the GR/IR , Stock accounts and other G/L involves and see what is the field status group , you have maintained for all G/Ls.
Now use t.code: OBC4
Select your field status variant & Click Filed Status Group TAB and check the Filed Status Group, what u have mentioned for the GR/IR ,Stock account & other G/Ls
Go To additional account assignment segment and put optional entry for the commitment item and save.( hope for any one of your G/L, is it required entry, just change and make it optional)
Now try ur transaction.
Regards,
Biju K

UnitOfWork is not committing in JBOSS

Hi All,
I'm using Toplink in Jboss 4.0.5 and getting the JDBC connection as:
uow = session.acquireUnitOfWork();
DatabaseLogin login = session.getLogin();
conn = (java.sql.Connection)login.connectToDatasource(null);
After performing the transactions its not commiting to the database, instead it gets committed as soon as I stop Jboss server.
Please help me to fix this issue..
Thanks

You should first make sure your session.login is completed before starting to use the session. I am unsure why you are accessing the connection. The connection returned will not necessarily be the one used by TopLink. You should just use the UnitOfWork and then rely on TopLink to properly access the configured data source during the transactional write.
The real issues surrounding TopLink's UnitOfWork and integration with the container is the type of transaction control and the type of data source being used.
JTA: Ensure you have a managed data source where the container controls the transactions. Then ensure you configure TopLink to use external transaction control. The UnitOfwork will be registered with the active JTA transaction and will write its SQL during the JTA call-backs and not on UnitOfWork.commit()
RESOURCE_LOCAL (JDBC): Ensure the data source is not managed (i.e. no JTA). Here the UnitfWork.commit() will cause Toplink to begin the transaction and write your changes.
Doug

RFC fetching data from table which is not commited

Hi Experts,
               I have a query regarding commit work.Below is the RFC that i have written
FUNCTION ZBAPI_CREATE.
*"*"Local Interface:
*" TABLES
*"      IT_ZABAP_RFC STRUCTURE ZBAPI_RFC_STR OPTIONAL
*"      RETURN STRUCTURE BAPIRET2 OPTIONAL
CALL FUNCTION 'ZBO_BAPI_CREATE'
TABLES
   IT_ZABAP_RFC       = IT_ZABAP_RFC
   RETURN             = return
Break-point.
DATA lt TYPE TABLE OF ZBAPI_RFC_STR_MAIN.
CALL FUNCTION 'ZBAPI_SEARCH_RANGE'
* EXPORTING
*   IS_STR        =
TABLES
   ET_TAB        = lt
*   RETURN        =
ENDFUNCTION.
here in first RFC call i am creating a record in ZTABLE , and then at break-point
i check the ZTABLE where it does not create any record because data is not commited into ZTABLE upto this point, but just after it i have written code for fetching data from ZTABLE but i am able to get this new record in lt.
Can anybody please explain that from where this serach RFC is providing data because inside serach i am simply selecting data from ZTABLE.
Regards,
Abhishek Bajpai
Edited by: ABHISHEK BAJPAI on Jan 28, 2009 1:12 PM

Hi Thomas,
                 Thanks for reply , i checked in ZTABLE ,before search RFC call data is not there but if i commit explicitly only then it is showing data in ZTABLE. Actually my requirement is different -
I have two RFCs 1. Create 2. Search , Now from web dynpro user will call first Create RFCs but at this point it should not insert record in ZTABLE and just after it user will call another search RFC and in this search he should be able to get these newly created records.
I want to have the functionality which a user gets when working with normal database front end like SQLPLus for Oracle. In these scenarios we see that whenever user does any insert or update the data sits in the table but still it is not committed. So there he fires Select query he sees the inserted data. But if he logs off from SQL PLUS and then logs in again, and fires Select query he does not see the data as it was not committed. I want a similiar functionalty in which if user inserts the data through Create RFC and fires the Select query through Search RFC then he can see the newly Created data also even though this data is not committed.
Although if i call create RFC in update task it will not update ZTABLE but in this situation , if user will call search RFC he will not be able to get newly created records.
So my requirement is that i should be able to get those records which are not commited in ZTABLE .If you have still any doubt regarding my question then please let me know.
Regards,
Abhishek

How to cancel an order if transaction not complete

How to cancel an order if transaction not complete

Presuming you're referring to a purchase from the iTunes Store, go here:
http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/contact/
and follow the instructions to report the issue to the iTunes Store. Refunds are not guaranteed, but iTunes support should be able to help you in one way or another.
Regards.

Special G/L transactions not defined for bills/exch.and down pmnts ERROR

Dear Experts,
I am trying to park document via F-63 - Invoice Parking - General to park down payments made to vendor using following details in initial screen for F-63:
Posting Key_____29
Account number _1000
SGL Ind ________A
after pressing enter key the system prompt error message that is:
Special G/L transactions not defined for bills/exch.and down pmnts
Message no. FP030
Diagnosis
You have selected a posting key with a special G/L indicator of type 'Bill of exchange', or 'Down payment'. Document parking is not defined for special G/L transactions of the type 'Bill of exchange' or 'Down payment'.
System Response
Document parking cannot be carried out.
Procedure
Select a different posting key or special G/L indicator. If the posting is a 'One-time posting' to a rent contract, select a different transaction type or post the document directly.
HOW CAN I PARK DOWN PAYMENT DOCUMENT FOR VENDOR. KINDLY PROVIDE SUITABLE SOLUTION.
REGARDS

Dear,
Your special G/L "A" is set as Down Payment/Down Payment request, this is what cause the error.
To meet your requirement just go to FBKP select special G/L "A" enter your chart of accounts and go into properties, change
Special G/L transaction types to Others from Payment/Down payment request.
Advances can be created as Special G/L transaction types Others
If parking is utmost required by you then according to me you should create two special G/L for Down Payment. New created should be used for parking and default by SAP you can use with functionality like F-47, F-48, F-54.
System is stopping you because down payment functionality is provided exhaustively in SAP so you should follow that.
Please analyze the process exhaustively and implement to smoothen your process.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi.

Idoc-51:Accounting transaction not permitted for posting in FI/CO

Hi,
Message type FIDCC2
Basic type FIDCCP02
Process code FID2
When i try to post for F-02, through WE19, above idoc, it is showing the 51 error: Accounting transaction not permitted for posting in FI/CO
I'm using the following fields:
E1FIKPF : FI Document Header (BKPF)
BUKRS : Name of global company code
GJAHR : Fiscal Year
BLART : Document Type
BLDAT : Document Date in Document
BUDAT : Posting Date in the Document
MONAT : Fiscal Period
TCODE : Transaction Code
WAERS : Currency Key
HWAER : Local Currency
E1FISEG : FI Document Item (BSEG) -1
BUZEI : Number of Line Item Within Accounting Document
BSCHL : Posting Key - 40
DMBTR : Amount in Local Currency
KOSTL : Cost Center
HKONT : General Ledger Account
WERKS : Site
E1FISEG : FI Document Item (BSEG) -2
BUZEI : Number of Line Item Within Accounting Document
BSCHL : Posting Key - 50
DMBTR : Amount in Local Currency
HKONT : General Ledger Account
WERKS : Site
Pls guide in fixing this.
rgds,
balu

Hi
What is the solution , please let us know ? since we have faced the same error.
Regards
Bhavana

Accounting transaction not permitted for posting in FI/CO

Hi,
For inbound idoc triggering,
Message type FIDCC2
Basic type FIDCCP02
Process code FID2
When i try to post for F-02(or FB01), through WE19, above idoc, it is showing the 51 error: Accounting transaction not permitted for posting in FI/CO
I'm using the following fields:
E1FIKPF : FI Document Header (BKPF)
BUKRS : Name of global company code
GJAHR : Fiscal Year
BLART : Document Type - SA
BLDAT : Document Date in Document
BUDAT : Posting Date in the Document
MONAT : Fiscal Period - 05
TCODE : Transaction Code - FB01
WAERS : Currency Key
HWAER : Local Currency
GLVOR : Business Transaction - RFBU
E1FISEG : FI Document Item (BSEG) -1
BUZEI : Number of Line Item Within Accounting Document
BSCHL : Posting Key - 40
DMBTR : Amount in Local Currency
KOSTL : Cost Center
HKONT : General Ledger Account
WERKS : Site
E1FISEG : FI Document Item (BSEG) -2
BUZEI : Number of Line Item Within Accounting Document
BSCHL : Posting Key - 50
DMBTR : Amount in Local Currency
HKONT : General Ledger Account
WERKS : Site
For which fields u've triggered successfully, pls help in resolving the same.
rgds,
balu

Hi,
i appreciate for your quick reply...
i've applied the code corrections in the FM FI_IDOC_PREPARE , but still same error coming.
tnx n rgds,
balu

Special G/L transactions not defined for bills/exch.and down pmnts

Dear Sapguru,
When i am down payment parking through F-65, and giving special gl indictor.
Error:---Special G/L transactions not defined for bills/exch.and down pmnts
Message no. FP030
Diagnosis
You have selected a posting key with a special G/L indicator of type 'Bill of exchange', or 'Down payment'. Document parking is not defined for special G/L transactions of the type 'Bill of exchange' or 'Down payment'.
System Response
Document parking cannot be carried out.
Procedure
Select a different posting key or special G/L indicator. If the posting is a 'One-time posting' to a rent contract, select a different transaction type or post the document directly.
Thanks.
Dharma.

Did you define spec. GL through OBXR (customers) or OBYR (vendors)?
regards

Creating a query that provides a default transaction type for those transactions not categorized?

How could I create a query that provides a default transaction type for those transactions not categorized?
So assuming I have:
* Transactions table (with transactions)
* Categories table
* transactions_categories table - allows to allocate multiple categories (with a percentage)
- tranactionID
- categoryID
- percentageAllocation
* Usage is such that only non-personal categories have been applied through out data. So there is a lot of transactions with no categories applied
Aim:
* Want to create a query that creates a list of all the allocated amounts, so would include as columns: transaction.tDate, transaction.tTitle, categories.name, allocatedAmount(calculated from percentage * transaction amount)
BUT:
* How could I include in the query, the entries that cover all transaction that haven't been allocated, to a default category "personal", where the allocated Amount would be 100% of the transaction value
* And also (if it were possible), for transactions that have been categorized but not for the complete transaction value (say only 50% was allocated to a category), how to to cover this off to.

To default the value of the category:
select IIf(IsNull(Category),"Personal",Category) as Category,IIf(IsNull(Category),"100%",PercentageAllocation
) as PercentageAllocation from [yourtable]
What do you want to put the values of these ones:
And also (if it were possible), for transactions that have been categorized but not for the complete transaction
value (say only 50% was allocated to a category), how to to cover this off to.
Fouad Roumieh

Why is my CLEAR_BLOCK(no_validate) not committing to the database?

What I need is when the alert button 1 is selected fo to the detail block(ADM) and just delete everything for the current master id. When I click on the button it deletes for a split second and all the data comes back.Quite confused..
IF Id_Null(al_id) THEN
Message('Alert does not exist');
RAISE Form_Trigger_Failure;
ELSE
al_button := Show_Alert(al_id);
IF al_button = ALERT_BUTTON1 THEN
     :global.cl_blk := 'Y';
     go_block('ADM');
     CLEAR_BLOCK(no_validate);
     synchronize;
     go_item('adm.dci_name');
     execute_query;
else
          :global.cl_blk := 'N';
GO_ITEM('AM.MAPPING_LEVEL');
END IF;
END IF;

Why is my CLEAR_BLOCK(no_validate) not committing to the database?Better read the Clear_Block on-line help. I think you are mistaking the No_Validate parameter with the Do_Commit parameter.
The No_Validate parameter "*+Form Builder flushes the current block without validating the changes, committing the changes, or prompting the end user.+*"
With No_Validate, your changes are discarded, and NOT committed.

Trigger changes are not committing to the database

I have 9iAS and 9i DB both on my laptop.
I am having a problem in which a trigger run off a WHEN_BUTTON_PRESSED function is not committing the changes to the database. In the trigger I have:
1 record insert into table A.
1 record update to table B.
1 record insert into table C.
1 delete from table D.
None of the data is related.
I have tried various combinations of the below to get the changes to commit:
POST;
COMMIT_FORM;
Exit_Form(NO_COMMIT, NO_ROLLBACK);
MESSAGE('Got past COMMIT');
COMMIT;
CLEAR_FORM(NO_COMMIT);
ENTER_QUERY;
I am getting varying amounts of "FRM: 40508 Oracle Error: Unable to INSERT record" statements. Even so, many times the form would act as if the changes had been properly applied. But when I did a separate DB verification, I would see that the changes are not being committed. Also, most of the time the changes would also be reflected in the calling form queries, but when I exit, all changes are rolled back no matter how many commit stmts are in the trigger.
I have finally gotten the form to do what I want to do (the 4 steps noted above), but I had to add a FORMS_DDL('COMMIT'); stmt and I am still getting a FRM 40508, but at least the changes are appearing in the db.
Any ideas on why so many troubles in getting the changes to commit??? I have spent a ton of hours trying "what ifs" to see what might work. Also, this trigger is the only real "code" in the forms.
Kim

Brett -
You're probably right about the intention, but this is a place where people can come and share styles, ideas, and coding tricks, I don't understand why someone would say that. Additionally, I had a professor who was a complete momo that said that all the time (consequently, his lax attitude towards teaching crippled the IS program where I graduated and most likely will cause it to no longer be available). It's a personal peeve of mine, just to let you know where I was coming from.
Secondly, the problem I'm having may have to do with what you said, however I can't be sure. To give a better description of my scenerio, I created a form that allows the user to load information about an employee by querying a SSN. Most of this information is for display only. Six fields are available to be updated and I wrote a DML UPDATE statement that I placed inside a WHEN-BUTTON-PRESSED trigger. However, these changes won't be written to the DB because Forms is attempting to write my entire datablock, instead of just following the specified DML statements. I'm at a loss as to why this would happen, but for simplicity's sake, I would listen to ideas of how to suppress this from happening so only my statements are used when updating the DB. If you can help, thank you, if not, then thank you for your time.
Steve

Transaction not authenticated. payment_status= pending_reason= result=

Hello, all! I am using a third party merchant to help process payments and send download emails. In my sandbox enviroment, the setup works flawlessly. I am using my wife's paypal account for testing purposes when purchasing from my business account. When payment completes, I receive notification and the payment is in my wallet. However, the testing account never receives the download email and does not return to my download page. Instead, this is what is on the screen... Transaction not authenticated. payment_status= pending_reason= result= Any ideas, why? It's driving me crazy. I believe my business is verified, but the testing account isn't completely confirmed. Thank you for your thoughts.

Hi,
If you would like to maintain status reasons, you will need to go through the following customizing steps:
1) Define you reason codes into a "code group profle" (also called "subject profile") for catalog A2
SPRO > CRM > Transaction > Settings for activities > Define activity reason > Define code groupe profiles
2) Then assign you profile to each status
SPRO > CRM > Transaction > Settings for activities > Maintain transaction cust for Act. > Assign status and subject profilefor each transaction type.
Hoe that helps,
Kind regards,
Nicolas.

Transaction not committed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for