Transaction taking more time

Hi Every One,
My query is
If you hit a Transaction it kept on executing (or) processing for more time why this happens and where should I trouble shoot this kind of problem.
With Regards,
Venkat

Hi,
Is it a transaction that is used often?
Perhaps the abap buffers are not large enough or SGEN needs to be run if it is always compiling.
Does is spend alot of time compiling or does it take a long time to finish?
Perhaps run a trace using ST05 or even better, through st12 and you will see where the most time is spent.
If its on the db side, you can see what statement is taking so long and then you can check if a suitable index was used or if one needs to be created. Or check the table involved in the query and see if it has up to date statistics.
Hope this helps,
Paul

Similar Messages

Saving miro transaction taking more time

HI Fi gurus,
I am getting the following problem :
In case of VAT invoice the vendor invoice verification takes 20-25 minutes for bill passing even though it is an single item invoice .(working in production server)
Can anybody tell me what could be the possible solution ?
Suitable answer will be rewarded points
regards
Vijay

Hi
Please review the following notes which help the performance in MIRO:
764687 Composite SAP Note, performance during statistics u
756292 Consulting: Performance MIRO Enter invoice
746515 Performance improvement MIRO for standard order
158519 Performance optimization in logistics invoice verif
134660 Logistics Invoice Verification: Performance (RBKP)
413446 Indexes for CIN tables for performance improvement
Please check that the indexes in note 134660 are activated on database
level and not just created.
Also if you are using CIN have you created the indexes as per note
413446?
You also send a OSS Message to SAP. In that Message attach a Trace List for the Performance of MIRO. If it helps, plz assign points.
Regards
Rajaram

Custom Report taking more time to complete Normat

Hi All,
Custom report(Aging Report) in oracle is taking more time to complete Normal.
In one instance, the same report is taking 5 min and the other instance this is taking 40-50 min to complete.
We have enabled the trace and checked the trace file, but all the queries are working fine.
Could you please suggest me regarding this issue.
Thanks in advance!!

TKPROF: Release 10.1.0.5.0 - Production on Tue Jun 5 10:49:32 2012
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Sort options: prsela exeela fchela
count = number of times OCI procedure was executed
cpu = cpu time in seconds executing
elapsed = elapsed time in seconds executing
disk = number of physical reads of buffers from disk
query = number of buffers gotten for consistent read
current = number of buffers gotten in current mode (usually for update)
rows = number of rows processed by the fetch or execute call
Error in CREATE TABLE of EXPLAIN PLAN table: APPS.prof$plan_table
ORA-00922: missing or invalid option
parse error offset: 1049
EXPLAIN PLAN option disabled.
SELECT DISTINCT OU.ORGANIZATION_ID , OU.BUSINESS_GROUP_ID
FROM
HR_OPERATING_UNITS OU WHERE OU.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID =:B1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 0.00 0.05 11 22 0 3
total 3 0.00 0.05 11 22 0 3
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
3 HASH UNIQUE (cr=22 pr=11 pw=0 time=52023 us cost=10 size=66 card=1)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=22 pr=11 pw=0 time=61722 us)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=20 pr=11 pw=0 time=61672 us cost=9 size=66 card=1)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=18 pr=11 pw=0 time=61591 us cost=7 size=37 card=1)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=16 pr=11 pw=0 time=61531 us cost=7 size=30 card=1)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION (cr=11 pr=9 pw=0 time=37751 us cost=6 size=22 card=1)
18 INDEX RANGE SCAN HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATIO_FK1 (cr=1 pr=1 pw=0 time=17135 us cost=1 size=0 card=18)(object id 43610)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS (cr=5 pr=2 pw=0 time=18820 us cost=1 size=8 card=1)
3 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN HR_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_PK (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=26 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 43657)
3 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNTS_TL_PK (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=32 us cost=0 size=7 card=1)(object id 44020)
3 INDEX RANGE SCAN HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATIO_FK2 (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=52 us cost=1 size=0 card=1)(object id 330960)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=26 us cost=2 size=29 card=1)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read 11 0.01 0.05
asynch descriptor resize 2 0.00 0.00
INSERT INTO FND_LOG_MESSAGES ( ECID_ID, ECID_SEQ, CALLSTACK, ERRORSTACK,
MODULE, LOG_LEVEL, MESSAGE_TEXT, SESSION_ID, USER_ID, TIMESTAMP,
LOG_SEQUENCE, ENCODED, NODE, NODE_IP_ADDRESS, PROCESS_ID, JVM_ID, THREAD_ID,
AUDSID, DB_INSTANCE, TRANSACTION_CONTEXT_ID )
VALUES
( SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV', 'ECID_ID'), SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV', 'ECID_SEQ'),
:B16 , :B15 , SUBSTRB(:B14 ,1,255), :B13 , SUBSTRB(:B12 , 1, 4000), :B11 ,
NVL(:B10 , -1), SYSDATE, FND_LOG_MESSAGES_S.NEXTVAL, :B9 , SUBSTRB(:B8 ,1,
60), SUBSTRB(:B7 ,1,30), SUBSTRB(:B6 ,1,120), SUBSTRB(:B5 ,1,120),
SUBSTRB(:B4 ,1,120), :B3 , :B2 , :B1 ) RETURNING LOG_SEQUENCE INTO :O0
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 20 0.00 0.03 4 1 304 20
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 21 0.00 0.03 4 1 304 20
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 LOAD TABLE CONVENTIONAL (cr=1 pr=4 pw=0 time=36498 us)
1 SEQUENCE FND_LOG_MESSAGES_S (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=24 us)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read 4 0.01 0.03
SELECT MESSAGE_TEXT, MESSAGE_NUMBER, TYPE, FND_LOG_SEVERITY, CATEGORY,
SEVERITY
FROM
FND_NEW_MESSAGES M, FND_APPLICATION A WHERE :B3 = M.MESSAGE_NAME AND :B2 =
M.LANGUAGE_CODE AND :B1 = A.APPLICATION_SHORT_NAME AND M.APPLICATION_ID =
A.APPLICATION_ID
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 2 0.00 0.03 4 12 0 2
total 5 0.00 0.03 4 12 0 2
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=6 pr=2 pw=0 time=15724 us cost=3 size=134 card=1)
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_APPLICATION (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=20 us cost=1 size=9 card=1)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_APPLICATION_U3 (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=9 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 33993)
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_NEW_MESSAGES (cr=4 pr=2 pw=0 time=15693 us cost=2 size=125 card=1)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_NEW_MESSAGES_PK (cr=3 pr=1 pw=0 time=6386 us cost=1 size=0 card=1)(object id 34367)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read 4 0.00 0.03
DELETE FROM MO_GLOB_ORG_ACCESS_TMP
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.02 3 4 4 1
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.00 0.02 3 4 4 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
0 DELETE MO_GLOB_ORG_ACCESS_TMP (cr=4 pr=3 pw=0 time=29161 us)
1 TABLE ACCESS FULL MO_GLOB_ORG_ACCESS_TMP (cr=3 pr=2 pw=0 time=18165 us cost=2 size=13 card=1)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read 3 0.01 0.02
SET TRANSACTION READ ONLY
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.01 0 0 0 0
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.00 0.01 0 0 0 0
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 1 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 1 0.00 0.00
begin Fnd_Concurrent.Init_Request; end;
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 148 0 1
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.00 0.00 0 148 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
log file sync 1 0.01 0.01
SQL*Net message to client 1 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 1 0.00 0.00
declare X0rv BOOLEAN; begin X0rv := FND_INSTALLATION.GET(:APPL_ID,
:DEP_APPL_ID, :STATUS, :INDUSTRY); :X0 := sys.diutil.bool_to_int(X0rv);
end;
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 9 0 1
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.00 0.00 0 9 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 8 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 8 0.00 0.00
begin fnd_global.bless_next_init('FND_PERMIT_0000');
fnd_global.initialize(:session_id, :user_id, :resp_id, :resp_appl_id,
:security_group_id, :site_id, :login_id, :conc_login_id, :prog_appl_id,
:conc_program_id, :conc_request_id, :conc_priority_request, :form_id,
:form_application_id, :conc_process_id, :conc_queue_id, :queue_appl_id,
:server_id); fnd_profile.put('ORG_ID', :org_id);
fnd_profile.put('MFG_ORGANIZATION_ID', :mfg_org_id);
fnd_profile.put('MFG_CHART_OF_ACCOUNTS_ID', :coa);
fnd_profile.put('APPS_MAINTENANCE_MODE', :amm); end;
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 8 0 1
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.00 0.00 0 8 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 1 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 1 0.00 0.00
SELECT FPI.STATUS, FPI.INDUSTRY, FPI.PRODUCT_VERSION, FOU.ORACLE_USERNAME,
FPI.TABLESPACE, FPI.INDEX_TABLESPACE, FPI.TEMPORARY_TABLESPACE,
FPI.SIZING_FACTOR
FROM
FND_PRODUCT_INSTALLATIONS FPI, FND_ORACLE_USERID FOU, FND_APPLICATION FA
WHERE FPI.APPLICATION_ID = FA.APPLICATION_ID AND FPI.ORACLE_ID =
FOU.ORACLE_ID AND FA.APPLICATION_SHORT_NAME = :B1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 2 0.00 0.00 0 7 0 1
total 4 0.00 0.00 0 7 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Misses in library cache during execute: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=89 us)
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=6 pr=0 pw=0 time=93 us cost=4 size=76 card=1)
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=5 pr=0 pw=0 time=77 us cost=3 size=67 card=1)
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_APPLICATION (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=19 us cost=1 size=9 card=1)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_APPLICATION_U3 (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=9 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 33993)
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_PRODUCT_INSTALLATIONS (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=51 us cost=2 size=58 card=1)
1 INDEX RANGE SCAN FND_PRODUCT_INSTALLATIONS_PK (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=27 us cost=1 size=0 card=1)(object id 22583)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_ORACLE_USERID_U1 (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=7 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 22597)
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_ORACLE_USERID (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=7 us cost=1 size=9 card=1)
SELECT P.PID, P.SPID, AUDSID, PROCESS, SUBSTR(USERENV('LANGUAGE'), INSTR(
USERENV('LANGUAGE'), '.') + 1)
FROM
V$SESSION S, V$PROCESS P WHERE P.ADDR = S.PADDR AND S.AUDSID =
USERENV('SESSIONID')
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 1
total 3 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=1883 us cost=1 size=108 card=2)
1 HASH JOIN (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=1869 us cost=1 size=100 card=2)
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=1059 us cost=0 size=58 card=2)
182 FIXED TABLE FULL X$KSLWT (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=285 us cost=0 size=1288 card=161)
1 FIXED TABLE FIXED INDEX X$KSUSE (ind:1) (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=617 us cost=0 size=21 card=1)
181 FIXED TABLE FULL X$KSUPR (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=187 us cost=0 size=10500 card=500)
1 FIXED TABLE FIXED INDEX X$KSLED (ind:2) (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=4 us cost=0 size=4 card=1)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
asynch descriptor resize 2 0.00 0.00
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 6 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 6 0.01 0.02 0 165 0 4
Fetch 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 1
total 13 0.01 0.02 0 165 0 5
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 37 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 37 1.21 2.19
log file sync 1 0.01 0.01
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 49 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 89 0.01 0.07 7 38 336 24
Fetch 29 0.00 0.09 15 168 0 27
total 167 0.02 0.16 22 206 336 51
Misses in library cache during parse: 3
Misses in library cache during execute: 1
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
asynch descriptor resize 6 0.00 0.00
db file sequential read 22 0.01 0.14
48 user SQL statements in session.
1 internal SQL statements in session.
49 SQL statements in session.
0 statements EXPLAINed in this session.
Trace file compatibility: 10.01.00
Sort options: prsela exeela fchela
1 session in tracefile.
48 user SQL statements in trace file.
1 internal SQL statements in trace file.
49 SQL statements in trace file.
48 unique SQL statements in trace file.
928 lines in trace file.
1338833753 elapsed seconds in trace file.

Post Goods Issue (VL06O) - taking more time approximate 30 to 45 minutes

Dear Sir,
While doing post goods issue against delivery document system is taking lots of time, this issue is very very urgent can any one resolved or provide suitable solution for solving this issue.
We creates every day approximate 160 sales order / delivery and goods issue against the same by using transaction code VL06O system is taking more time for PGI.
Kindly provide suitable solution for the same.
Regards,
Vijay Sanguri

Hi
See Note 113048 - Collective note on delivery monitor and search notes related with performance.
Do a trace with tcode ST05 (look for help from a basis consultant) and search the bottleneck. Search possible sources of performance problems in userexits, enhancements and so on.
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

Taking More Time while inserting into the table (With foriegn key)

Hi All,
I am facing problem while inserting the values into the master table.
The problem,
Table A -- User Master Table (Reg No, Name, etc)
Table B -- Transaction Table (Foreign key reference with Table A).
While inserting the data's in Table B, i need to insert the reg no also in table B which is mandatory. I followed the logic which is mentioned in the SRDemo.
While inserting we need to query the Table A first to have the values in TableABean.java.
final TableA tableA= (TableA )uow.executeQuery("findUser",TableA .class, regNo);
Then, we need to create the instance for TableB
TableB tableB= (TableB)uow.newInstance(TableB.class);
tableB.setID(bean.getID);
tableA.addTableB(tableB); --- this is for to insert the regNo of TableA in TableB.. This line is executing the query "select * from TableB where RegNo = <tableA.getRegNo>".
This query is taking too much time if values are more in the TableB for that particular registrationNo. Because of this its taking more time to insert into the TableB.
For Ex: TableA -- regNo : 101...having less entry in TableB means...inserting record is taking less than 1 sec
regNo : 102...having more entry in TableB means...inserting record is taking more than 2 sec
Time delay is there for different users when they enter transaction in TableB.
I need to avoid this since in future it will take more time...from 2 sec to 10 sec, if volume of data increases mean.
Please help me to resolve this issue...I am facing it now in production.
Thanks & Regards
VB

Hello,
Looks like you have a 1:M relationship from TableA to TableB, with a 1:1 back pointer from TableB to TableA. If triggering the 1:M relationship is causing you delays that you want to avoid there might be two quick ways I can see:
1) Don't map it. Leave the TableA->TableB 1:M unmapped, and instead just query for relationship when you do need it. This means you do not need to call tableA.addTableB(tableB), and instead only need to call tableB.setTableA(tableA), so that the TableB->TableA relation gets set. Might not be the best option, but it depends on your application's usage. It does allow you to potentially page the TableB results or add other query query performance options when you do need the data though.
2) You are currently using Lazy loading for the TableA->TableB relationship - if it is untriggered, don't bother calling tableA.addTableB(tableB), and instead only need to call tableB.setTableA(tableA). This of course requires using TopLink api to a) verify the collection is an IndirectCollection type, and b) that it is hasn't been triggered. If it has been triggered, you will still need to call tableA.addTableB(tableB), but it won't result in a query. Check out the oracle.toplink.indirection.IndirectContainer class and it's isInstantiated() method. This can cause problems though in highly concurrent environments, as other threads may have triggered the indirection before you commit your transaction, so that the A->B collection is not up to date - this might require refreshing the TableA if so.
Change tracking would probably be the best option to use here, and is described in the EclipseLink wiki:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Introduction_to_EclipseLink_Transactions_(ELUG)#Attribute_Change_Tracking_Policy
Best Regards,
Chris

Oracle Drop command taking more time in AIX When compared to Windows

Hi
We are firing a normal Drop command on our database and the databse version is 10.2.0.4.The catabase is running on AIX v5.The command is taking more time than usual .
There are no waits on session.Let me try to put the scenario in more simple terms.I have a nested table NT_TEST with record count 0 and i am dropping the statement using "Drop table NT_TEST" in windows it is getting dropped say some 218 Milli seconds.
The same table when i am dropping it in AIX it is taking around 6 seconds.
There are no locks ,Flashback is off,Triggers are not involved.Drop is not waiting on any transaction to complete.
Could anybody help me out on this.

Quite possible. On most Unixes asynchronous I/O requires purchasing extra options, and most sites just purchase the default O/S. Or asynchronous I/O is not enabled by default or the database is located on an ufs file system.
You provided no info at all on your AIX configuration. AIX does have asynchronous I/O, it is not always enabled, and the number of slaves is usually way too low.
As root, run smit aio and report the results.
At his point your unfavorable comparison of Windows and AIX is quite unfair. Unix doesn't run out of the box.
You know that famous joke 'If operating systems were airplanes'?
In that joke, the Unix airplane is assembled on the spot, but the Windows airplane is three months late.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

Quesry taking more time to execute

Dear All,
User complained that his query is taking more time than yesterday and DB performance is also very slow, so what would be your strategy to check and fix the problem.
What could be the right approach to check and fix this.
Regards,
DevD!
Edited by: user12138514 on Nov 8, 2009 9:35 PM

And here is the cause list for slow performance:
Slow Network connection.
Bad Connection management.
Bad Use of Cursors and the Shared Pool
Bad SQL or Query is not perfectly tune or not using bind variables.
Use of nonstandard initialization parameters.
Getting Database I/O Wrong
Redo Log Setup Problems
Serialization of data blocks in the buffer cache due to lack of free lists, free list groups, transaction slots (INITRANS), or shortage of rollback segments.
Long Full Table Scans.
High Amounts of Recursive (SYS) SQL
Deployment and Migration Errors
Table require analyzed.
Table require indexed.
Overparsing.
You have old discs.
Not enough memory.
SGA is too small or too big.
Same for cache buffer.
Your OS need tuning.
Your disc is full.
Running so many instances on a single server.
You applications are badly written.
Your applications were ported from Sybase or Microsoft SQL Server.
Your applications were ported from DB2.
Your applications dynamically create temp tables.
Someone wrote referential integrity using triggers, java, vb ...
Someone wrote replication using triggers, java, vb ...
Someone wrote a sequence using max + 1.
Table datatypes are not as per DBMS concepts; like Dates and numbers are stored as strings.
The statistics are not up to date.
There are no statistics.
What are statistics?
We are using RBO.
That's a few of the possible causes I could think of, there are lots of others.
-To analyze your application, you can install Statspack. It will give you some indications.
Hth
Girish Sharma

Whats the reason for taking more time

Hi,
I'm into production support, previously all loadings are fine from the past one month there is a problem in many infopackages taking more time for same no of records, normal wait time is 1 hr, but it is taking 2 to 3 hrs to complete.
Can any body tell the reasons for this and any resolutions will be a graet help for me.
Thanks in advance.
Siddhu

HI,
Try to analyse those cube for which loading is taking more time by RSRV Transaction especially see whether dimension table size is more than 20% of fact table size.
Another reason might be the Table Space Problem or also ask ur basis guys about the Redolog management , ask whether there is enough space while peak loading is going on....
Assign points if helps....
Regards,
VIjay.

Standard tcode is taking more time

Hi,
When i am trying to delete or save any shipments through standard tcodes VT01N and VT02N. It is taking more time to process. Please tell me the solution to increase the performance.

Hi Shruti,
Whenever you face an issue with a standard SAP functionality, its wise to consult SAP notes @ [http://service.sap.com|http://service.sap.com]. I did a search using the string "Saving shipment VT01N VT02N performance" and got some very useful notes on the issue.
Some useful notes are:
859483, 391287, 391287 .... you would want to refer to the version and apply using BASIS help (SNOTE transaction and only if applicable for your version release).
Regards,
Aditya

PGI Taking more time approximate 30 to 45 minutes

Dear Sir,
While doing post goods issue against delivery document system is taking lots of time, this issue is very very urgent can any one resolved or provide suitable solution for solving this issue.
We creates every day approximate 160 sales order / delivery and goods issue against the same by using transaction code VL06O system is taking more time for PGI.
Kindly provide suitable solution for the same.
Regards,
Vijay Sanguri

Hello Vijay,
I've just found the SAP Note 1459217 which definitively refers to your issue. Please have a look on it (see below the respective SAP note text).
In case you have question let me know!
Best Regards,
Marcel Mizt
Symptom
Long runtimes occur when using transaction VL06G or VL06O in order to post goods issue (PGI) deliveries.
Poor response times occur when using transaction VL06G or VL06O in order to PGI deliveries.
Poor performance occurs with transaction VL06G / VL06O.
Performance issues occur with transaction VL06G / VL06O.
Environment
SAP R/3 All Release Levels
Reproducing the Issue
Execute transaction VL06O.
Choose "For Goods Issue". (Transaction VL06G).
Long runtimes occur.
Cause
There are too many documents in the database that need to be accessed.
The customising settings in the activity "set updating of partner index" are not activated.
(IMG -> Logistics Execution -> Shipping -> Delivery List -> Set Updating Of Partner Index).
Resolution
If there are too many documents in the database to access, archiving them improves the performance of VL06G.
The customising settings in the activity "set updating of partner index" can be updated to improve the performance of VL06G. (IMG -> Logistics Execution -> Shipping -> Delivery List -> Set Updating Of Partner Index). In this transaction, check the entries for the transaction group 6 (= delivery). The effect of these settings is that the table VLKPA (SD index: deliveries by partner functions) is only filled with entries based on the partner functions listed (for example WE = ship-to party). In transaction VL060 the system is checking this customising in order to access the table VBPA or VLKPA.
If you change the settings of the activity "updating of partner index", run the report RVV05IVB to reorganize the index seleting only partner index in the delivery section of the screen. (see note 128947).
Flag the checkbox "display forwarding agent" (available in the display options section of the selection screen). When the list is generated, use the "set filter" functionality (menu path: edit -> set filter) in order to select the deliveries correspondng to one forwarding agent.

Query in timesten taking more time than query in oracle database

Hi,
Can anyone please explain me why query in timesten taking more time
than query in oracle database.
I am mentioning in detail what are my settings and what have I done
step by step.........
1.This is the table I created in Oracle datababase
(Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0)...
CREATE TABLE student (
id NUMBER(9) primary keY ,
first_name VARCHAR2(10),
last_name VARCHAR2(10)
2.THIS IS THE ANONYMOUS BLOCK I USE TO
POPULATE THE STUDENT TABLE(TOTAL 2599999 ROWS)...
declare
firstname varchar2(12);
lastname varchar2(12);
catt number(9);
begin
for cntr in 1..2599999 loop
firstname:=(cntr+8)||'f';
lastname:=(cntr+2)||'l';
if cntr like '%9999' then
dbms_output.put_line(cntr);
end if;
insert into student values(cntr,firstname, lastname);
end loop;
end;
3. MY DSN IS SET THE FOLLWING WAY..
DATA STORE PATH- G:\dipesh3repo\db
LOG DIRECTORY- G:\dipesh3repo\log
PERM DATA SIZE-1000
TEMP DATA SIZE-1000
MY TIMESTEN VERSION-
C:\Documents and Settings\dipesh>ttversion
TimesTen Release 7.0.3.0.0 (32 bit NT) (tt70_32:17000) 2007-09-19T16:04:16Z
Instance admin: dipesh
Instance home directory: G:\TimestTen\TT70_32
Daemon home directory: G:\TimestTen\TT70_32\srv\info
THEN I CONNECT TO THE TIMESTEN DATABASE
C:\Documents and Settings\dipesh> ttisql
command>connect "dsn=dipesh3;oraclepwd=tiger";
4. THEN I START THE AGENT
call ttCacheUidPwdSet('SCOTT','TIGER');
Command> CALL ttCacheStart();
5.THEN I CREATE THE READ ONLY CACHE GROUP AND LOAD IT
create readonly cache group rc_student autorefresh
interval 5 seconds from student
(id int not null primary key, first_name varchar2(10), last_name varchar2(10));
load cache group rc_student commit every 100 rows;
6.NOW I CAN ACCESS THE TABLES FROM TIMESTEN AND PERFORM THE QUERY
I SET THE TIMING..
command>TIMING 1;
consider this query now..
Command> select * from student where first_name='2155666f';
< 2155658, 2155666f, 2155660l >
1 row found.
Execution time (SQLExecute + Fetch Loop) = 0.668822 seconds.
another query-
Command> SELECT * FROM STUDENTS WHERE FIRST_NAME='2340009f';
2206: Table SCOTT.STUDENTS not found
Execution time (SQLPrepare) = 0.074964 seconds.
The command failed.
Command> SELECT * FROM STUDENT where first_name='2093434f';
< 2093426, 2093434f, 2093428l >
1 row found.
Execution time (SQLExecute + Fetch Loop) = 0.585897 seconds.
Command>
7.NOW I PERFORM THE SIMILAR QUERIES FROM SQLPLUS...
SQL> SELECT * FROM STUDENT WHERE FIRST_NAME='1498671f';
ID FIRST_NAME LAST_NAME
1498663 1498671f 1498665l
Elapsed: 00:00:00.15
Can anyone please explain me why query in timesten taking more time
that query in oracle database.
Message was edited by: Dipesh Majumdar
user542575
Message was edited by:
user542575

TimesTen
Hardware: Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise x64; 8 x Dual-core AMD 8216 2.41GHz processors; 32 GB RAM
Version: 7.0.4.0.0 64 bit
Schema:
create usermanaged cache group factCache from
MV_US_DATAMART
ORDER_DATE               DATE,
IF_SYSTEM               VARCHAR2(32) NOT NULL,
GROUPING_ID                TT_BIGINT,
TIME_DIM_ID               TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
BUSINESS_DIM_ID          TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
ACCOUNT_DIM_ID               TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
ORDERTYPE_DIM_ID          TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
INSTR_DIM_ID               TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
EXECUTION_DIM_ID          TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
EXEC_EXCHANGE_DIM_ID TT_INTEGER NOT NULL,
NO_ORDERS               TT_BIGINT,
FILLED_QUANTITY          TT_BIGINT,
CNT_FILLED_QUANTITY          TT_BIGINT,
QUANTITY               TT_BIGINT,
CNT_QUANTITY               TT_BIGINT,
COMMISSION               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_COMMISSION               TT_BIGINT,
FILLS_NUMBER               TT_BIGINT,
CNT_FILLS_NUMBER          TT_BIGINT,
AGGRESSIVE_FILLS          TT_BIGINT,
CNT_AGGRESSIVE_FILLS          TT_BIGINT,
NOTIONAL               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_NOTIONAL               TT_BIGINT,
TOTAL_PRICE               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_TOTAL_PRICE          TT_BIGINT,
CANCELLED_ORDERS_COUNT          TT_BIGINT,
CNT_CANCELLED_ORDERS_COUNT     TT_BIGINT,
ROUTED_ORDERS_NO          TT_BIGINT,
CNT_ROUTED_ORDERS_NO          TT_BIGINT,
ROUTED_LIQUIDITY_QTY          TT_BIGINT,
CNT_ROUTED_LIQUIDITY_QTY     TT_BIGINT,
REMOVED_LIQUIDITY_QTY          TT_BIGINT,
CNT_REMOVED_LIQUIDITY_QTY     TT_BIGINT,
ADDED_LIQUIDITY_QTY          TT_BIGINT,
CNT_ADDED_LIQUIDITY_QTY     TT_BIGINT,
AGENT_CHARGES               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_AGENT_CHARGES          TT_BIGINT,
CLEARING_CHARGES          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_CLEARING_CHARGES          TT_BIGINT,
EXECUTION_CHARGES          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_EXECUTION_CHARGES          TT_BIGINT,
TRANSACTION_CHARGES          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_TRANSACTION_CHARGES     TT_BIGINT,
ORDER_MANAGEMENT          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_ORDER_MANAGEMENT          TT_BIGINT,
SETTLEMENT_CHARGES          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_SETTLEMENT_CHARGES          TT_BIGINT,
RECOVERED_AGENT          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_RECOVERED_AGENT          TT_BIGINT,
RECOVERED_CLEARING          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_RECOVERED_CLEARING          TT_BIGINT,
RECOVERED_EXECUTION          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_RECOVERED_EXECUTION     TT_BIGINT,
RECOVERED_TRANSACTION          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_RECOVERED_TRANSACTION     TT_BIGINT,
RECOVERED_ORD_MGT          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_RECOVERED_ORD_MGT          TT_BIGINT,
RECOVERED_SETTLEMENT          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_RECOVERED_SETTLEMENT     TT_BIGINT,
CLIENT_AGENT               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_CLIENT_AGENT          TT_BIGINT,
CLIENT_ORDER_MGT          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_CLIENT_ORDER_MGT          TT_BIGINT,
CLIENT_EXEC               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_CLIENT_EXEC          TT_BIGINT,
CLIENT_TRANS               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_CLIENT_TRANS          TT_BIGINT,
CLIENT_CLEARING          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_CLIENT_CLEARING          TT_BIGINT,
CLIENT_SETTLE               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_CLIENT_SETTLE          TT_BIGINT,
CHARGEABLE_TAXES          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_CHARGEABLE_TAXES          TT_BIGINT,
VENDOR_CHARGE               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_VENDOR_CHARGE          TT_BIGINT,
ROUTING_CHARGES          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_ROUTING_CHARGES          TT_BIGINT,
RECOVERED_ROUTING          BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_RECOVERED_ROUTING          TT_BIGINT,
CLIENT_ROUTING               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_CLIENT_ROUTING          TT_BIGINT,
TICKET_CHARGES               BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_TICKET_CHARGES          TT_BIGINT,
RECOVERED_TICKET_CHARGES     BINARY_FLOAT,
CNT_RECOVERED_TICKET_CHARGES     TT_BIGINT,
PRIMARY KEY(ORDER_DATE, TIME_DIM_ID, BUSINESS_DIM_ID, ACCOUNT_DIM_ID, ORDERTYPE_DIM_ID, INSTR_DIM_ID, EXECUTION_DIM_ID,EXEC_EXCHANGE_DIM_ID),
READONLY);
No of rows: 2228558
Config:
< CkptFrequency, 600 >
< CkptLogVolume, 0 >
< CkptRate, 0 >
< ConnectionCharacterSet, US7ASCII >
< ConnectionName, tt_us_dma >
< Connections, 64 >
< DataBaseCharacterSet, AL32UTF8 >
< DataStore, e:\andrew\datacache\usDMA >
< DurableCommits, 0 >
< GroupRestrict, <NULL> >
< LockLevel, 0 >
< LockWait, 10 >
< LogBuffSize, 65536 >
< LogDir, e:\andrew\datacache\ >
< LogFileSize, 64 >
< LogFlushMethod, 1 >
< LogPurge, 0 >
< Logging, 1 >
< MemoryLock, 0 >
< NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS, BYTE >
< NLS_NCHAR_CONV_EXCP, 0 >
< NLS_SORT, BINARY >
< OracleID, NYCATP1 >
< PassThrough, 0 >
< PermSize, 4000 >
< PermWarnThreshold, 90 >
< PrivateCommands, 0 >
< Preallocate, 0 >
< QueryThreshold, 0 >
< RACCallback, 0 >
< SQLQueryTimeout, 0 >
< TempSize, 514 >
< TempWarnThreshold, 90 >
< Temporary, 1 >
< TransparentLoad, 0 >
< TypeMode, 0 >
< UID, OS_OWNER >
ORACLE:
Hardware: Sunos 5.10; 24x1.8Ghz (unsure of type); 82 GB RAM
Version 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
Schema:
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW OS_OWNER.MV_US_DATAMART
TABLESPACE TS_OS
PARTITION BY RANGE (ORDER_DATE)
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_MINVAL VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-11-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_07_NOV_D1 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-11-11 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_07_NOV_D2 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-11-21 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_07_NOV_D3 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-12-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_07_DEC_D1 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-12-11 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_07_DEC_D2 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2007-12-21 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_07_DEC_D3 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2008-01-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_08_JAN_D1 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2008-01-11 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_08_JAN_D2 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2008-01-21 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_08_JAN_D3 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE(' 2008-02-01 00:00:00', 'SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS', 'NLS_CALENDAR=GREGORIAN'))
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS,
PARTITION MV_US_DATAMART_MAXVAL VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE)
LOGGING
NOCOMPRESS
TABLESPACE TS_OS
NOCACHE
NOCOMPRESS
NOPARALLEL
BUILD DEFERRED
USING INDEX
TABLESPACE TS_OS_INDEX
REFRESH FAST ON DEMAND
WITH PRIMARY KEY
ENABLE QUERY REWRITE
AS
SELECT order_date, if_system,
GROUPING_ID (order_date,
if_system,
business_dim_id,
time_dim_id,
account_dim_id,
ordertype_dim_id,
instr_dim_id,
execution_dim_id,
exec_exchange_dim_id
) GROUPING_ID,
/* ============ DIMENSIONS ============ */
time_dim_id, business_dim_id, account_dim_id, ordertype_dim_id,
instr_dim_id, execution_dim_id, exec_exchange_dim_id,
/* ============ MEASURES ============ */
-- o.FX_RATE /* FX_RATE */,
COUNT (*) no_orders,
-- SUM(NO_ORDERS) NO_ORDERS,
-- COUNT(NO_ORDERS) CNT_NO_ORDERS,
SUM (filled_quantity) filled_quantity,
COUNT (filled_quantity) cnt_filled_quantity, SUM (quantity) quantity,
COUNT (quantity) cnt_quantity, SUM (commission) commission,
COUNT (commission) cnt_commission, SUM (fills_number) fills_number,
COUNT (fills_number) cnt_fills_number,
SUM (aggressive_fills) aggressive_fills,
COUNT (aggressive_fills) cnt_aggressive_fills,
SUM (fx_rate * filled_quantity * average_price) notional,
COUNT (fx_rate * filled_quantity * average_price) cnt_notional,
SUM (fx_rate * fills_number * average_price) total_price,
COUNT (fx_rate * fills_number * average_price) cnt_total_price,
SUM (CASE
WHEN order_status = 'C'
THEN 1
ELSE 0
END) cancelled_orders_count,
COUNT (CASE
WHEN order_status = 'C'
THEN 1
ELSE 0
END
) cnt_cancelled_orders_count,
-- SUM(t.FX_RATE*t.NO_FILLS*t.AVG_PRICE) AVERAGE_PRICE,
-- SUM(FILLS_NUMBER*AVERAGE_PRICE) STAGING_AVERAGE_PRICE,
-- COUNT(FILLS_NUMBER*AVERAGE_PRICE) CNT_STAGING_AVERAGE_PRICE,
SUM (routed_orders_no) routed_orders_no,
COUNT (routed_orders_no) cnt_routed_orders_no,
SUM (routed_liquidity_qty) routed_liquidity_qty,
COUNT (routed_liquidity_qty) cnt_routed_liquidity_qty,
SUM (removed_liquidity_qty) removed_liquidity_qty,
COUNT (removed_liquidity_qty) cnt_removed_liquidity_qty,
SUM (added_liquidity_qty) added_liquidity_qty,
COUNT (added_liquidity_qty) cnt_added_liquidity_qty,
SUM (agent_charges) agent_charges,
COUNT (agent_charges) cnt_agent_charges,
SUM (clearing_charges) clearing_charges,
COUNT (clearing_charges) cnt_clearing_charges,
SUM (execution_charges) execution_charges,
COUNT (execution_charges) cnt_execution_charges,
SUM (transaction_charges) transaction_charges,
COUNT (transaction_charges) cnt_transaction_charges,
SUM (order_management) order_management,
COUNT (order_management) cnt_order_management,
SUM (settlement_charges) settlement_charges,
COUNT (settlement_charges) cnt_settlement_charges,
SUM (recovered_agent) recovered_agent,
COUNT (recovered_agent) cnt_recovered_agent,
SUM (recovered_clearing) recovered_clearing,
COUNT (recovered_clearing) cnt_recovered_clearing,
SUM (recovered_execution) recovered_execution,
COUNT (recovered_execution) cnt_recovered_execution,
SUM (recovered_transaction) recovered_transaction,
COUNT (recovered_transaction) cnt_recovered_transaction,
SUM (recovered_ord_mgt) recovered_ord_mgt,
COUNT (recovered_ord_mgt) cnt_recovered_ord_mgt,
SUM (recovered_settlement) recovered_settlement,
COUNT (recovered_settlement) cnt_recovered_settlement,
SUM (client_agent) client_agent,
COUNT (client_agent) cnt_client_agent,
SUM (client_order_mgt) client_order_mgt,
COUNT (client_order_mgt) cnt_client_order_mgt,
SUM (client_exec) client_exec, COUNT (client_exec) cnt_client_exec,
SUM (client_trans) client_trans,
COUNT (client_trans) cnt_client_trans,
SUM (client_clearing) client_clearing,
COUNT (client_clearing) cnt_client_clearing,
SUM (client_settle) client_settle,
COUNT (client_settle) cnt_client_settle,
SUM (chargeable_taxes) chargeable_taxes,
COUNT (chargeable_taxes) cnt_chargeable_taxes,
SUM (vendor_charge) vendor_charge,
COUNT (vendor_charge) cnt_vendor_charge,
SUM (routing_charges) routing_charges,
COUNT (routing_charges) cnt_routing_charges,
SUM (recovered_routing) recovered_routing,
COUNT (recovered_routing) cnt_recovered_routing,
SUM (client_routing) client_routing,
COUNT (client_routing) cnt_client_routing,
SUM (ticket_charges) ticket_charges,
COUNT (ticket_charges) cnt_ticket_charges,
SUM (recovered_ticket_charges) recovered_ticket_charges,
COUNT (recovered_ticket_charges) cnt_recovered_ticket_charges
FROM us_datamart_raw
GROUP BY order_date,
if_system,
business_dim_id,
time_dim_id,
account_dim_id,
ordertype_dim_id,
instr_dim_id,
execution_dim_id,
exec_exchange_dim_id;
-- Note: Index I_SNAP$_MV_US_DATAMART will be created automatically
-- by Oracle with the associated materialized view.
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX OS_OWNER.MV_US_DATAMART_UDX ON OS_OWNER.MV_US_DATAMART
(ORDER_DATE, TIME_DIM_ID, BUSINESS_DIM_ID, ACCOUNT_DIM_ID, ORDERTYPE_DIM_ID,
INSTR_DIM_ID, EXECUTION_DIM_ID, EXEC_EXCHANGE_DIM_ID)
NOLOGGING
NOPARALLEL
COMPRESS 7;
No of rows: 2228558
The query (taken Mondrian) I run against each of them is:
select sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."NOTIONAL") as "m0"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."FILLED_QUANTITY") as "m1"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."AGENT_CHARGES") as "m2"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."CLEARING_CHARGES") as "m3"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."EXECUTION_CHARGES") as "m4"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."TRANSACTION_CHARGES") as "m5"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."ROUTING_CHARGES") as "m6"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."ORDER_MANAGEMENT") as "m7"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."SETTLEMENT_CHARGES") as "m8"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."COMMISSION") as "m9"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_AGENT") as "m10"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_CLEARING") as "m11"
--,sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_EXECUTION") as "m12"
--,sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_TRANSACTION") as "m13"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_ROUTING") as "m14"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_ORD_MGT") as "m15"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_SETTLEMENT") as "m16"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."RECOVERED_TICKET_CHARGES") as "m17"
--,sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."TICKET_CHARGES") as "m18"
--, sum("MV_US_DATAMART"."VENDOR_CHARGE") as "m19"
          from "OS_OWNER"."MV_US_DATAMART" "MV_US_DATAMART"
where I uncomment a column at a time and rerun. I improved the TimesTen results since my first post, by retyping the NUMBER columns to BINARY_FLOAT. The results I got were:
No Columns     ORACLE     TimesTen
1     1.05     0.94
2     1.07     1.47
3     2.04     1.8
4     2.06     2.08
5     2.09     2.4
6     3.01     2.67
7     4.02     3.06
8     4.03     3.37
9     4.04     3.62
10     4.06     4.02
11     4.08     4.31
12     4.09     4.61
13     5.01     4.76
14     5.02     5.06
15     5.04     5.25
16     5.05     5.48
17     5.08     5.84
18     6     6.21
19     6.02     6.34
20     6.04     6.75

CDP Performance Issue-- Taking more time fetch data

Hi,
I'm working on Stellent 7.5.1.
For one of the portlet in portal its taking more time to fetch data. Please can some one help me to solve this issue.. So that performance can be improved.. Please kindly provide me solution.. This is my code for fetching data from the server....
public void getManager(final HashMap binderMap)
throws VistaInvalidInputException, VistaDataNotFoundException,
DataException, ServiceException, VistaTemplateException
     String collectionID =
getStringLocal(VistaFolderConstants.FOLDER_ID_KEY);
     long firstStartTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
HashMap resultSetMap = null;
String isNonRecursive = getStringLocal(VistaFolderConstants
.ISNONRECURSIVE_KEY);
if (isNonRecursive != null
&& isNonRecursive.equalsIgnoreCase(
VistaContentFetchHelperConstants.STRING_TRUE))
VistaLibraryContentFetchManager libraryContentFetchManager =
new VistaLibraryContentFetchManager(
binderMap);
SystemUtils.trace(
VistaContentFetchHelperConstants.CONTENT_FETCH_TRACE,
"The input Parameters for Content Fetch = "
+ binderMap);
          resultSetMap = libraryContentFetchManager
.getFolderContentItems(m_workspace);
* used to add the resultset to the binder.
addResultSetToBinder(resultSetMap , true);
else
     long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
* isStandard is used to decide the call is for Standard or
* Extended.
SystemUtils.trace(
VistaContentFetchHelperConstants.CONTENT_FETCH_TRACE,
"The input Parameters for Content Fetch = "
+ binderMap);
String isStandard = getTemplateInformation(binderMap);
long endTimeTemplate = System.currentTimeMillis();
binderMap.put(VistaFolderConstants.IS_STANDARD,
isStandard);
long endTimebinderMap = System.currentTimeMillis();
VistaContentFetchManager contentFetchManager
= new VistaContentFetchManager(binderMap);
long endTimeFetchManager = System.currentTimeMillis();
resultSetMap = contentFetchManager
.getAllFolderContentItems(m_workspace);
long endTimeresultSetMap = System.currentTimeMillis();
* used to add the resultset and the total no of content items
* to the binder.
addResultSetToBinder(resultSetMap , false);
long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
if (perfLogEnable.equalsIgnoreCase("true"))
     Log.info("Time taken to execute " +
               "getTemplateInformation=" +
               (endTimeTemplate - startTime)+
               "ms binderMap=" +
               (endTimebinderMap - startTime)+
               "ms contentFetchManager=" +
               (endTimeFetchManager - startTime)+
               "ms resultSetMap=" +
               (endTimeresultSetMap - startTime) +
               "ms getManager:getAllFolderContentItems = " +
               (endTime - startTime) +
               "ms overallTime=" +
               (endTime - firstStartTime) +
               "ms folderID =" +
               collectionID);
Edited by: 838623 on Feb 22, 2011 1:43 AM

Hi.
The Select statment accessing MSEG Table is Slow Many a times.
To Improve the performance of MSEG.
1.Check for the proper notes in the Service Market Place if you are working for CIN version.
2.Index the MSEG table
2.Check and limit the Columns in the Select statment .
Possible Way.
SELECT MBLNR MJAHR ZEILE BWART MATNR WERKS LIFNR MENGE MEINS
EBELN EBELP LGORT SMBLN BUKRS GSBER INSMK XAUTO
FROM MSEG
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE ITAB
WHERE WERKS EQ P_WERKS AND
MBLNR IN S_MBLNR AND
BWART EQ '105' .
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002361303'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003501080'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002996300'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002996407'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003587026'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003587026'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003493186'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002720583'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002928122'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002628263'.
Select
Regards
Bala.M
Edited by: Bala Malvatu on Feb 7, 2008 9:18 PM

Report rdf with size 8mb taking more time to open

Hello All,
I have a rdf ( reports 6i) report with size 8.5mb taking more time to open and more time to access each field.
Please let me know how do i solve this issue.
Please do the needful.
Thanks.

Thanks for immediate response.
pls let me know how do i know this.
Right now i have the below details from report->help
Report Builder 6.0.8.11.3
ORACLE Server Release 8.0.6.0.0
Oracle Procedure Builder 6.0.8.11.0
Oracle ORACLE PL/SQL V8.0.6.0.0 - Production
Oracle CORE Version 4.0.6.0.0 - Production
Oracle Tools Integration Services 6.0.8.10.2
Oracle Tools Common Area 6.0.5.32.1
Oracle Toolkit 2 for Windows 32-bit platforms 6.0.5.35.0
Resource Object Store 6.0.5.0.1
Oracle Help 6.0.5.35.0
Oracle Sqlmgr 6.0.8.11.3
Oracle Query Builder 6.0.7.0.0 - Production
PL/SQL Editor (c) WinMain Software (www.winmain.com), v1.0 (Production)
Oracle ZRC 6.0.8.11.3
Oracle Express 6.0.8.3.5
Oracle XML Parser 1.0.2.1.0 Production
Oracle Virtual Graphics System 6.0.5.35.0
Oracle Image 6.0.5.34.0
Oracle Multimedia Widget 6.0.5.34.0
Oracle Tools GUI Utilities 6.0.5.35.0
Thanks
Edited by: Abdul Khan on Jan 26, 2010 11:54 PM

XML Publisher(XDODTEXE) in EBS taking more time with the same SQL in TOAD

HI
XML Publisher(XDODTEXE) in EBS taking more time with the same SQL in TOAD.
The sql has 5 union clauses.
It takes 20-30 minutes in TOAD compared to running through Concurrent Program in XML Publisher in EBS taking around 4-5 hours.
The Scalable Flag at report level is turned on with the JVM options set to -Xmx1024m -Xmx1024m in Concurrent Program definition.
Other configurations for Data Template like XSLT, Scalable, Optimization are turned on though didn't bounce the OPP Server for these to take effect as I am not sure whether it is needed.
Thanks in advance for your help.

But the question is that how come it is working in TOAD and takes only 15-20 minutes?
with initialization of session ?
what about sqlplus ?
Do I have to set up the the temp directory for the XML Publisher report to make it faster?
look at
R12: Troubleshooting Known XML Publisher and E-Business Suite (EBS) Integration Issues (Doc ID 1410160.1)
BI Publisher - Troubleshooting Oracle Business Intelligence (XML) Publisher For The Oracle E-Business Suite (Doc ID 364547.1)

INSTR() function is taking more time

im using the below query select query in my procedure.
select distinct SUPPLIER_CIRCUIT_ID from SUPPLIER_DATA
where INSTR(i.SYSTEM_CIRCUIT_ID,SUPPLIER_CIRCUIT_ID) > 0;
I am taking SYSTEM_CIRCUIT_ID in cursor.
This query is taking more time. Is that possiblt to create function based index and speed up the query?

Hi,
Welcome to the forum!
993620 wrote:
im using the below query select query in my procedure.
select distinct SUPPLIER_CIRCUIT_ID from SUPPLIER_DATA
where INSTR(i.SYSTEM_CIRCUIT_ID,SUPPLIER_CIRCUIT_ID) > 0;
I am taking SYSTEM_CIRCUIT_ID in cursor.Show exactly what you're doing.
Whenever you have a problem, post a complete test script that people can run to re-create the problem and test their ideas.
See te forum FAQ {message:id=9360002}
This query is taking more time. Is that possiblt to create function based index and speed up the query?Sorry, unless you doing something very specific (such as alwyas looking for the same sub-string) then a function-based index won't help.
Oracle sells a separate product, called Oracle Text, for this kind of searching.
You might try LIKE:
WHERE i.SYSTEM_CIRCUIT_ID LIKE '%' || SUPPLIER_CIRCUIT_ID || '%'If you're using a cursor, then that's probably slowing the process down much more than the part you're showing.

Transaction taking more time

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for