TRs are not being generated in Movement Type 261/262

Hi Gurus,
I am perfoming several material documents with movement type 261/262 and I don t know why in some cases the WM tab is generated without TR with only a storage bin.....so we don t have the possibility to take the TR and transform it into a TO....I have checked the configuration of the movement type in SPRO WM and everything seem to be OK, as usual....Any clue on this?
Many Thanks!!!!
Regards

Q1 : If I perform 261 in MIGO or in MB1A in a WM warehouse which It has NOT activated the PP-WM interface. the behavior will be the same ? - Yes, because selection of storage type and storage bin is from the control cycle which plays a major role if control cycle is not defined then system accepts standard 914 as destination storage type if control cycle is defined then it ignores standard SAP value and pick the storage type and bin from the control cycle.
Goods Issue w/ref. to the PP order will be created without TR and to a storage bin in Storage Type 100? and on the contrary, - Even if you do a Goods issue w/ref and control cycle is not defined then at the time of production order creation system update reservation table with blank entry under warehouse / storage type & storage bin  and once you will do the MIGO for this system will consider 914 as storage type
if the control cycle is define then the value in RESB will be like below screen
if in this example I generate a 261 as Goods Issue Others the WM tab will have Intermediate Storage Type 914 and it will have a TR number?? ---Since this is without reference in the MIGO you will not find the Reservation tab and system will go with Standard SAP (914) storage type

Similar Messages

  • Notifications are not being generated for any emails that have rules applied to them.

    Notifications are not being generated for any emails that have rules applied to them. Any clues how to fix this?

    In System Center 2012 Operations Manager, the alert notification will be sent when the alert first meets all criteria, regardless of resolution state, unless resolution state itself is a criterion. If alert suppression is enabled for the rule or monitor
    that raises an alert, only one notification will be sent when the subscription criteria are first met. No additional notifications will be sent until the alert is closed and a new alert is raised that meets all subscription criteria.  PLease check
    1) whether your rule has trun on alert supression
    2) Close the alert, craised by rule,  and do it again
    Roger

  • Movement type 261/262

    Hi All,
    Good issue to production using movement type 261 or 262 (Consumption for order from warehouse).  Question is Can this transaction block the material to be issued if it is not in the BOM?  If can not, is there a way to block the material to be issued if not part of the BOM.
    Thanks.

    Let me give an example.
    Product material 10005 has BOM material A, B, and C.  Production Order 12345 is created for that material 10005.  Material A is not configured as a backflush, where as B and C is backflush.  I am focusing in material A.  Material A is issued using MIGO, good issue, others with mv type 261.  In the selection under Account Assignment, there is a field "Order" which is entered for the Production Order #.  The problem is if the material A12 which is not part of the BOM is entered instead of material A, the system does not reject.  It is the same if using mv type 262.  This will cause an issue in the reporting.  Is there a way to prevent the system not accept the wrong material that is not part of the BOM?
    Thanks.

  • CUP 5.3 UAR requests are not being generated

    Hello,
    I am having a problem setting up UAR workflow in CUP.
    I have analyzed my config and tried everything given on SAP note 1290835, but I cannot still generate UAR requests (I have set role owners as UAR reviewers, but unfortunately they are not getting an approval request for UAR review.
    If anyone of you has an idea of what went wrong, please help.
    Thanks,
    HM

    HM,
    Since your UAR process is based on "Role Owner" as reviewer, please ensure that each role being reviewed has Role Owner information associated.
    Generally ADMIN review is advisable for both UAR/SOD reviews so that GRC Admin can cancel irrelevant requests or adjusts the reviewers.
    If you have enabled the ADMIN review, then after admin review is done, schedule the UAR Review update workflow tasks so the requests are pushed to next stage(First stage - Role owner as Reviewers) of UAR review path.
    If ADMIN review is not enabled requests will be directly dispatched to the role owners ASA they are generated.
    Ensure that you have correct workflow path configured, SMTP server connection is working properly (for emails) and appropriate email message configured under Reviewer stage.
    Once requests are moved out of ADMIN review they are no longer available in User Review--> Request Review.
    To verify the current open requests use CUP Config >Request->Administration to search for open UAR requests.
    As you mentioned that requests were generated but Reviewers did not receive the email, please check SMTP config and Stage level email setting.
    Also note that Reviewer-Coordinator mapping is an optional part if you want to have Coordinators monitor/track incomplete reviews. If you decide to use this feature, you have to populate it before UAR requests are generated(before UAR Review Load Data job).
    Let me know if you still have any issues with UAR review (ensure to mention current CUP/ERM support pack level).
    Regards,
    Amol

  • Traces are not being generated

    hi,
    I have 9.1.0.8 database on windows 2003 (32 bit). I am suing following statement to start system wide tracing but i don't see any tarces being generated at user_dump_dest location. any idea what is going wrong and what thing i am missing?
    ALTER SYSTEM SET EVENTS '10046 trace name context forever, level 8';
    Timed_statistics is set to true
    Salman

    Strange - what you have done should work, it works on my 10G database OK.
    Sorry but dont have much else to add ...
    I presume that if you just do it at session level it works ok?
    ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS '10046 trace name context forever, level 8';

  • Reports not being Generated

    I use Crystal Reports with another program that supposed to generate 2 reports with a click of a button, but it is not working. The reports are not being generated. I installed Crystal Reports on my system twice and there doesn't seem to be a problem with the installation, but the program is not working. Please help.

    I am fairly new at this so let me try my best to answer these questions:
    Crystal Reports  XI
    Visual Studio? Not sure
    No service pack applied. How and where do i get it?
    I am using Windows XP
    I am not viewing the reports as it has to be generated before i am able to view and the systems does nothing after I click the generate button
    No  have not tried to view a single report; i don't know how.
    I have not used Crystal reports designer for anything else.
    Edited by: Sharon Aird on Dec 1, 2008 5:05 PM

  • ADDM report not being generated

    I noticed that addm reports are not being generated from last 2 days. So I did the following:
    SQL> exec dbms_workload_repository.create_snapshot;
    BEGIN dbms_workload_repository.create_snapshot; END;
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-13516: AWR Operation failed: only a subset of SQL can be issued
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_WORKLOAD_REPOSITORY", line 10
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_WORKLOAD_REPOSITORY", line 33
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    I got above error. I am not sure what that means. I also ran below SQL:
    SQL> select nam.ksppinm name, val.KSPPSTVL, nam.ksppdesc description
    2 from x$ksppi nam, x$ksppsv val
    3 where nam.indx = val.indx and
    4 nam.ksppinm = '_awr_restrict_mode'
    5 order by 1
    6 ;
    awrrestrict_mode
    FALSE
    AWR Restrict Mode
    What could be the reason that the reports are not being generated anymore

    Check Note:308003.1 - AWR Snapshots Not Generating

  • Default Personnel No. Ranges not being generated through NUMKR

    Default personnel number ranges according to the company / client are not being generated. what should I do further to fix the problem?

    Hi first go to PA04 and maintain the different number ranges as stated above.
    01            1 to 2000
    02           2001 to 5000 etc
    here 01, 02 are different number ranges.
    In your case maintain a number range number 6 with a range as per your requirement.
    Then go to PE03 NUMKR feature.
    Create subnodes using Personnel Area with a return value as the number range number.
    So in you case decision tree should look like should look like
    NUMKR
    WERKS
    GUJ1 ( PA for Gujraat)
    06 ( return value = number range number )
    Hope this helps.
    Ajay

  • FI documents generated from RE-FX are not being summarized

    The Fi documents generated from periodic posting in RE-FX are not being summarize, even thou the have the same customer, the same flow type and account determination.
    I checked the corresponding customizing Item related and the seem to be right. The system seems to be skiping  this.
    I have 2 conditions in the RE contract that goes to the same flow type and account determination but the document is generated with the two separated line item.
    Tanks in advance
    Noel.

    Hi Noel,
    I guess you have already checked your customizing.
    If you are technically interested you may have a look into the
    coding to see which fields are checked and must be equal for
    summarization.
    class: CL_RERA_DOC_ITEM_CNDS
    method: CONDENSE_APAR_ITEMS
    If you set a breakpoint there and follow the program you may see why the items are not condensed.
    Regards, Franz

  • Accounting documents not getting generated for mvt. type 221 Q

    Hi friends,
    When goods are issued for consumption for project accounting documents are not getting generated.
    I have tried with mvt. type 412 Q, 211 Q,
    by mvt type 412 Q, the stock is transfered to project stock, it shows the stock of material in project stock, by movement type 211 Q the project stock gets consumed. So at the time of consumption of consumption account should hit and relevent accounting document should get generated. this is not happenning.
    When i check material document and check for accounting document, message flashses that movement is not rrelevent for accounting.
    Can any one throw more light on this?
    Thanks and regards
    SAP MM

    Hi,
    Please check in PO item details Delivery tab. In that GR Non-valuated checkbox might be checked.Generally for account assignment category asset it is ticked.
    If you tick GR non-valuated check box then at the time of GR accounting document will not be created.Accounting document will be created only at the time of IR.
    or
    Have you mantained Chart of accounts.
    have you mantained Valuation area settings
    Transaction event key
    Valuation class settings.
    Check your material master data in accounting view have mantained Valuation class.
    Check your back ground settings OMWN.

  • Spool file not being generated in production server

    Hello
    Our end users are using automatic payment program F110 to print multiple cheques.
    The settings in SPAD are identical in Quality and Production Server,but some how
    spool file is not being generated in production.
    Test printing is fine in Quality server.
    Printer being used is Epson LQ 300.Device type is EPESCP2.
    We are using z custom page size ,and it is assigned to printer device Type as well
    Would be very great if some can can comment on which settings to check,as SPAD setting is
    same in both server ,yet no spool.Very Very urgent.
    Iam not sure ,whose domain is it now-BASIS or ABAP.
    Thanks a lot
    Nouman

    If there is a problem with the spool, the variant that is being in F110 parameters.
    As you are saying the quality system is working fine, please compare both the variants in Production and Quality systems.
    This should solve your situation.

  • Finish good material not showed with 131 movement type in mfbf code in REM

    Hi experts,
    I am working in Repetitive manufacturing process, I have 6 operations in rate routing from which 6th operation is mile stone.
    When i confirm last operation through MFBF, system shows components list with movement type 261 but finish material is not showing with movement type 131. The document no. is generated at the time of saving but in displayed document FG shows with 131mov. type and component list with 261.
    Setting for REM are as follows
    1. control key- pp03
    2. production versions- maintained with standard REM profile
    So my question is how can i see FG material in MFBF screen along with componets list ? What is the settings for this or any development is there ?
    Regards,
    Nitin Nerkar

    Nitin,
    System behavior is not wrong. What i understand from  Backflush is, Back flushing is nothing but automatic goods issue. System will automatically posts the goods issue when you confirm the operations.You have no need to make manual issue. It will reduce the effort.
    Backflushing is automatic accounting (Goods issues - 261 mvt) of material consumed for production, at the time of confirmation.
    When you use auto goods receipt indicator then at the time of confirmation system will do auto GR. In normal discrete mfg scenario, when you are doing confirmation when you click on GOOD MOVEMENT tab you will get GI as well as GR with movement type.
    But in REM scenario you doing MFBF (REM Backflush) means This activity executes multiple activities in a single step, such as: finished product goods receipt, backflush of component materials, posting of costs to cost collector and creation of material and accounting documents. When you are doing MFBF and clicking on post with correction tab it will show you what are the components going to backflush, and that is ok. Here you are not going GOODS MOVEMENT tab to display GR.
    I think this SAP system std behavior.
    Tara

  • I've set up my Gmail account to auto forward messages to iCloud Mail but message are not being received. Can anyone help?

    I've set up my Gmail account to auto forward messages to iCloud Mail but message are not being received in iCloud Mail.
    Can anyone help?

    Try this out...  this worked like a charm:
    *On a desktop PC, log into your gmail account.
    *Click the gear up in the top right corner > Settings
    *Click Accounts
    *Under "Change Account Settings", click "Other Goole Account Settings"
    *Along the left, click "Security"
    *Under 2-step verification, click "Manage your application specific passwords"
    *It will ask for your usual gmail account password and take you to a page that says "
    Authorized Access to your Google Account
    *You will see a box to type in something (I just typed in iPad) then click "Generate Password"
    *It will generate a random password for you...  you will need this password Once in your iPad....
    Now...
    *Go to your iPhone Settings>Mail, Contacts, Calendars>Add Account>Google
    *Type in your name, your usual gmail email address and for the password, type in that random one generated on your PC
    It should work from there, if not follow what is below!
    *On a desktop PC, log into your gmail account.
    *Click the gear up in the top right corner > Settings
    *Click Accounts
    *Under "Change Account Settings", click "Other Goole Account Settings"
    *Along the left, click "Security"
    *Under 2-step verification, click "Manage your application specific passwords"
    *It will ask for your usual gmail account password and take you to a page that says "
    Authorized Access to your Google Account
    *You will see a box to type in something (I just typed in iPad) then click "Generate Password"
    *It will generate a random password for you...  you will need this password THREE TIMES in your phone or ipad....
    Now...
    *Go to your iPhone Settings>Mail, Contacts, Calendars>Add Account>Other>add mail account
    *Type in your name, your usual gmail email address and for the password, type in that random one generated on your PC
    *Next
    Incoming Mail Server:
    Host Name: imap.gmail.com
    User name: (your gmail email address)
    Password: TYPE IN THAT RANDOM PASSWORD AGAIN
    Outgoing Mail Server:
    Host name: smtp.gmal.com
    User name (your gmail email address)
    Password: TYPE IN THAT RANDOM PASSWORD AGAIN
    Done
    And allll the emails came rushing in   Hope this works for you!

  • Proposals are not getting generated for BOM items in MD50

    Hi Gurus,
    I have maintained strategy 50 in MRP for header material , Item category gp as LUMF & maintained consumption parameters in material master .
    For dependent requirements i have maintained BOM for production & sales usage, Strategy is blank as it is customer specific component , Item category gp is NORM , individual requirements i.e 1 in MRP 4 view.
    MRP type is PD in both materials.
    When i run a MRP thru' MD50 after getting customer order.
    it is not planning my dependent requirements i.e. proposals are not getting generated for dependent requirements (BOM materials).
    Please let me know the solution.
    Thanx in advance
    Regards,
    Nagraj Vasmate

    try to use strategy 20

  • In the attached VI I dont understand why data from the inner case structures are not being transmitted to the array.

    In the attached VI I don't understand why data from the inner case structures are not being transmitted to the array.
    Thank you.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.
    Attachments:
    TEMP.vi ‏25 KB

    It took me some time to figure what you are trying to do but I think I have it now.
    The SR is still required.
    What is happening is your "Bundle By Name" is replacing all of the fields of the cluster, not just the value coming out of the case structure. So to maintain the cluster stuff you do in earlier iterations you can either...
    1) Put the "Index array, Bundle by name, and Replace array" inside the case structure and ONLY bundle the value you are setting in that iteration. (as you will see Tim post shortly)
    OR
    2) Move the Index array before the Case, unbundle all of the fields and feed teh case structure and run them across the case so that ALL of your output tunnels come from the coresponding input tunnel EXCEPT for the filed you are trying to set.
    Ben
    Message Edited by Ben on 05-05-2010 01:31 PM
    Ben Rayner
    I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
    Rayner's Ridge is under construction

Maybe you are looking for