Two Inspection Plan for the same work centre
Hi Gurus,
I need your help,one of my client needs the following requriment.
1. He is having the two workcentre A and B
2. A has lesser tolarance and b has the higher tolarance
3.While confirmation the plan associated to the lesser or higher tolarance has to be automatically assign to the inspection lot.
I think in standard SAP, it canot be done
Kindly suggest me way out
Thanks in advance
Jai
Hi Jai,
1. You can go with the solution given by Mr. Reddy, You can cretate two insepction plans with two different tolerances assign the same material to both, system will give a prompt before releasing the lot for RR.
2. You create singal insepction plan, assign the Both materail to it then, in the charecteristics overview screen, select the Charecteristics that is having differnt tolerence, and then you can use the Dependant charecteristic.
Reward points is helpfull
Regards,.
Shyamal
Similar Messages
-
Multiple Executions Plans for the same SQL statement
Dear experts,
awrsqrpt.sql is showing multiple executions plans for a single SQL statement. How is it possible that one SQL statement will have multiple Executions Plans within the same AWR report.
Below is the awrsqrpt's output for your reference.
WORKLOAD REPOSITORY SQL Report
Snapshot Period Summary
DB Name DB Id Instance Inst Num Release RAC Host
TESTDB 2157605839 TESTDB1 1 10.2.0.3.0 YES testhost1
Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap: 32541 11-Oct-08 21:00:13 248 141.1
End Snap: 32542 11-Oct-08 21:15:06 245 143.4
Elapsed: 14.88 (mins)
DB Time: 12.18 (mins)
SQL Summary DB/Inst: TESTDB/TESTDB1 Snaps: 32541-32542
Elapsed
SQL Id Time (ms)
51szt7b736bmg 25,131
Module: SQL*Plus
UPDATE TEST SET TEST_TRN_DAY_CL = (SELECT (NVL(ACCT_CR_BAL,0) + NVL(ACCT_DR_BAL,
0)) FROM ACCT WHERE ACCT_TRN_DT = (:B1 ) AND TEST_ACC_NB = ACCT_ACC_NB(+)) WHERE
TEST_BATCH_DT = (:B1 )
SQL ID: 51szt7b736bmg DB/Inst: TESTDB/TESTDB1 Snaps: 32541-32542
-> 1st Capture and Last Capture Snap IDs
refer to Snapshot IDs witin the snapshot range
-> UPDATE TEST SET TEST_TRN_DAY_CL = (SELECT (NVL(ACCT_CR_BAL,0) + NVL(AC...
Plan Hash Total Elapsed 1st Capture Last Capture
# Value Time(ms) Executions Snap ID Snap ID
1 2960830398 25,131 1 32542 32542
2 3834848140 0 0 32542 32542
Plan 1(PHV: 2960830398)
Plan Statistics DB/Inst: TESTDB/TESTDB1 Snaps: 32541-32542
-> % Total DB Time is the Elapsed Time of the SQL statement divided
into the Total Database Time multiplied by 100
Stat Name Statement Per Execution % Snap
Elapsed Time (ms) 25,131 25,130.7 3.4
CPU Time (ms) 23,270 23,270.2 3.9
Executions 1 N/A N/A
Buffer Gets 2,626,166 2,626,166.0 14.6
Disk Reads 305 305.0 0.3
Parse Calls 1 1.0 0.0
Rows 371,735 371,735.0 N/A
User I/O Wait Time (ms) 564 N/A N/A
Cluster Wait Time (ms) 0 N/A N/A
Application Wait Time (ms) 0 N/A N/A
Concurrency Wait Time (ms) 0 N/A N/A
Invalidations 0 N/A N/A
Version Count 2 N/A N/A
Sharable Mem(KB) 26 N/A N/A
Execution Plan
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | UPDATE STATEMENT | | | | 1110 (100)| |
| 1 | UPDATE | TEST | | | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TEST | 116K| 2740K| 1110 (2)| 00:00:14 |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACCT | 1 | 26 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | ACCT_DT_ACC_IDX | 1 | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Plan 2(PHV: 3834848140)
Plan Statistics DB/Inst: TESTDB/TESTDB1 Snaps: 32541-32542
-> % Total DB Time is the Elapsed Time of the SQL statement divided
into the Total Database Time multiplied by 100
Stat Name Statement Per Execution % Snap
Elapsed Time (ms) 0 N/A 0.0
CPU Time (ms) 0 N/A 0.0
Executions 0 N/A N/A
Buffer Gets 0 N/A 0.0
Disk Reads 0 N/A 0.0
Parse Calls 0 N/A 0.0
Rows 0 N/A N/A
User I/O Wait Time (ms) 0 N/A N/A
Cluster Wait Time (ms) 0 N/A N/A
Application Wait Time (ms) 0 N/A N/A
Concurrency Wait Time (ms) 0 N/A N/A
Invalidations 0 N/A N/A
Version Count 2 N/A N/A
Sharable Mem(KB) 26 N/A N/A
Execution Plan
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | UPDATE STATEMENT | | | | 2 (100)| |
| 1 | UPDATE | TEST | | | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TEST | 1 | 28 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | TEST_DT_IND | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACCT | 1 | 26 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_ACCT_DT | 1 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Full SQL Text
SQL ID SQL Text
51szt7b736bm UPDATE TEST SET TEST_TRN_DAY_CL = (SELECT (NVL(ACCT_CR_BAL, 0) +
NVL(ACCT_DR_BAL, 0)) FROM ACCT WHERE ACCT_TRN_DT = (:B1 ) AND PB
RN_ACC_NB = ACCT_ACC_NB(+)) WHERE TEST_BATCH_DT = (:B1 )Your input is highly appreciated.
Thanks for taking your time in answering my question.
RegardsOracle Lover3 wrote:
Dear experts,
awrsqrpt.sql is showing multiple executions plans for a single SQL statement. How is it possible that one SQL statement will have multiple Executions Plans within the same AWR report.If you're using bind variables and you've histograms on your columns which can be created by default in 10g due to the "SIZE AUTO" default "method_opt" parameter of DBMS_STATS.GATHER__STATS it is quite normal that you get different execution plans for the same SQL statement. Depending on the values passed when the statement is hard parsed (this feature is called "bind variable peeking" and enabled by default since 9i) an execution plan is determined and re-used for all further executions of the same "shared" SQL statement.
If now your statement ages out of the shared pool or is invalidated due to some DDL or statistics gathering activity it will be re-parsed and again the values passed in that particular moment will determine the execution plan. If you have skewed data distribution and a histogram in place that reflects that skewness you might get different execution plans depending on the actual values used.
Since this "flip-flop" behaviour can sometimes be counter-productive if you're unlucky and the values used to hard parse the statement leading to a plan that is unsuitable for the majority of values used afterwards, 11g introduced the "adaptive" cursor sharing that attempts to detect such a situation and can automatically re-evaluate the execution plan of the statement.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/ -
Can we create two dashboard prompts for the same column in the samepage
hi ,
can we create two dashboard prompts for the same column on the same page,
I have a date column and I am trying to create 2 dashboard prompts on the same page one as from date and the other one as to date.Is this possible to create.When I am trying to create it is giving me error like cannot use same column for creating the prompt
Any suggestions or ideas863997 wrote:
hi ,
can we create two dashboard prompts for the same column on the same page,
I have a date column and I am trying to create 2 dashboard prompts on the same page one as from date and the other one as to date.Is this possible to create.When I am trying to create it is giving me error like cannot use same column for creating the prompt
Any suggestions or ideasYou are correct. You cannot build two prompts on the same column. Use this link for instructions on how to build a "between prompt" because of this fact:
http://oraclebizint.wordpress.com/2008/02/26/oracle-bi-ee-101332-between-prompts-for-date-columns-using-presentation-variables/ -
In MIGO two seperate entry for the same Material in Accounting Document
Dear Expert,
Hi
Business is doing stock transfer transaction. Here with reference to stock transfer PO when business is doing Goods Issue.
here there is two stock transfer PO. in one PO there is two line items for the same material. in the second PO again same material with two line items.
but at the tme of Goods issue it is showing two seperate line for same material stock account credit in accounting document. but in the other Goods issue with reference to second PO it is showing only one line for inventory account credit in the accounting dcoument.
so pl. guide me on this.
thanks
H shahHi,
Step 1 : First we create the Stock transfer PO.
Step 2 : Goods issue with ref to above stock transfer PO ( Movement type 351) - MIGO
Step 3 : Goods Receipt with ref to above stock transfer PO ( Movement Type 101 )- MIGO
Thanks
H shah -
Different execution plans for the same sql
Hi,
Im testing our new 10gR2 database on Linux and I can't understand why the same query use different plan.
Here are the details.
Table name: invoice_detail
Records: About 10,670,900
Columns:
No
seq (the primary key is No+Seq). Each invoices contains +/- 10 invoice_details.
category ( <- 10 different values )
State ( <- 3 different values )
Basically, I have an index on the primary key and another index on Category + State.
My request:
select *
from invoice_detail
where no=123456 <- Best index to use
and state <> 'CANCEL'
and category = 'INVOICE'
If i run this query from Toad or sql+, that's fine.
The same query (i'm watching it from EM) executed via Forms use the category+state index.
When I first import the database, the last thing I do is to run DBMS_STATS.GATHER_DATABASE_STATS.
At this point, Forms use the right index.
The day after (after the database has been analyzed with the predefined job via EM) Forms use the wrong index.
I re-analyzed everything with exec DBMS_STATS.GATHER_DATABASE_STATS but the problem is still there.
Thanks in advanceI'm already using bind variables.
I changed the "Estimated Percentage" to 100% in "Gather Optimizer Statistics Default Options" and now it seems to use the correct index. I'm stressed because I dont understand why it chooses different plan for the same sql.
Actually, my users test the migration 1 day after I load all the data (drop schema-create schema-load data-analyze database) and at this point everythings go fine. After the second analyze of the database, the DB choose the wrong indexes.
I really cannot migrate until I understand why it happens.
Any ideas?
TIA -
Assignments of materials and vendors to inspection plans for the plant 1500
Hi to all,
Please give me solution for make assignments of materials and vendors to inspection plans for the plant 1500.
Thanks,
NAgeshhi gang,
try to make usage decision ,kindly check in material document which you have created while making the GR, check in which storgare location you have specified and try to transfer the stock from quality to unrestricted.and also make a note on batch number also if you have activated the batch management
regards
thyagarajan -
CBO generating different plans for the same data in similar Environments
Hi All
I have been trying to compare an SQL from 2 different but similar environments build of the same hardware specs .The issue I am facing is environment A, the query executes in less than 2 minutes with plan mostly showing full table scans and hash join whereas in environment B(problematic), it times out after 2 hours with an error of unable to extend table space . The statistics are up to date in both environments for both tables and indexes . System parameters are exactly similar(default oracle for except for multiblock_read_count ).
Both Environment have same db parameter for db_file_multiblock_read_count(16), optimizer(refer below),hash_area_size (131072),pga_aggregate_target(1G),db_block_size(8192) etc . SREADTIM, MREADTIM, CPUSPEED, MBRC are all null in aux_stats in both environment because workload was never collected i believe.
Attached is details about the SQL with table stats, SQL and index stats my main concern is CBO generating different plans for the similar data and statistics and same hardware and software specs. Is there any thing else I should consider .I generally see environment B being very slow and always plans tend to nested loops and index scan whereas what we really need is a sensible FTS in many cases. One of the very surprising thing is METER_CONFIG_HEADER below which has just 80 blocks of data is being asked for index scan.
show parameter optimizer
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.2.0.4
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
**Environment**
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
Note: : There are slight difference in the no of records in the attached sheet.However, I wanted to tell that i have tested with exact same data and was getting similar results but I couldn't retain the data untill collecting the details in the attachment
TEST1 COMPARE TABLE LEVE STATS used by CBO
ENVIRONMENT A
TABLE_NAME NUM_ROWS BLOCKS LAST_ANALYZED
ASSET 3607425 167760 5/02/2013 22:11
METER_CONFIG_HEADER 3658 80 5/01/2013 0:07
METER_CONFIG_ITEM 32310 496 5/01/2013 0:07
NMI 1899024 33557 18/02/2013 10:55
REGISTER 4830153 101504 18/02/2013 9:57
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET 1607456 19137 18/02/2013 15:48
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER 5110781 78691 18/02/2013 9:56
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT 1425890 42468 18/02/2013 13:54
ENVIRONMENT B
TABLE_NAME NUM_ROWS BLOCKS LAST_ANALYZED
ASSET 4133939 198570 16/02/2013 10:02
METER_CONFIG_HEADER 3779 80 16/02/2013 10:55
METER_CONFIG_ITEM 33720 510 16/02/2013 10:55
NMI 1969000 33113 16/02/2013 10:58
REGISTER 5837874 120104 16/02/2013 11:05
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET 1788152 22325 16/02/2013 11:06
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER 6101934 91088 16/02/2013 11:07
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT 1447589 43804 16/02/2013 11:11
TEST ITEM 2 COMPARE INDEX STATS used by CBO
ENVIRONMENT A
TABLE_NAME INDEX_NAME UNIQUENESS BLEVEL LEAF_BLOCKS DISTINCT_KEYS AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY CLUSTERING_FACTOR NUM_ROWS
ASSET IDX_AST_DEVICE_CATEGORY_SK NONUNIQUE 2 9878 67 147 12982 869801 3553095
ASSET IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 7291 2747 2 639 1755977 3597916
ASSET SYS_C00102592 UNIQUE 2 12488 3733831 1 1 3726639 3733831
METER_CONFIG_HEADER SYS_C0092052 UNIQUE 1 12 3670 1 1 3590 3670
METER_CONFIG_ITEM SYS_C0092074 UNIQUE 1 104 32310 1 1 32132 32310
NMI IDX_NMI_ID NONUNIQUE 2 6298 844853 1 2 1964769 1965029
NMI IDX_NMI_ID_NK NONUNIQUE 2 6701 1923072 1 1 1922831 1923084
NMI IDX_NMI_STATS NONUNIQUE 1 106 4 26 52 211 211
REGISTER REG_EFFECTIVE_DTM NONUNIQUE 2 12498 795 15 2899 2304831 4711808
REGISTER SYS_C00102653 UNIQUE 2 16942 5065660 1 1 5056855 5065660
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 3667 1607968 1 1 1607689 1607982
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SDP_SK NONUNIQUE 2 3811 668727 1 2 1606204 1607982
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET SYS_C00102665 UNIQUE 2 5116 1529606 1 1 1528136 1529606
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER SYS_C00102677 UNIQUE 2 17370 5193638 1 1 5193623 5193638
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 4406 676523 1 2 1423247 1425890
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_SAP_INT_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 7374 676523 1 2 1458238 1461108
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT SYS_C00102687 UNIQUE 2 4737 1416207 1 1 1415022 1416207
ENVIRONMENT B
TABLE_NAME INDEX_NAME UNIQUENESS BLEVEL LEAF_BLOCKS DISTINCT_KEYS AVG_LEAF_BLOCKS_PER_KEY AVG_DATA_BLOCKS_PER_KEY CLUSTERING_FACTOR NUM_ROWS
ASSET IDX_AST_DEVICE_CATEGORY_SK NONUNIQUE 2 8606 121 71 16428 1987833 4162257
ASSET IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 8432 1780146 1 1 2048170 4162257
ASSET SYS_C00116157 UNIQUE 2 13597 4162263 1 1 4158759 4162263
METER_CONFIG_HEADER SYS_C00116570 UNIQUE 1 12 3779 1 1 3734 3779
METER_CONFIG_ITEM SYS_C00116592 UNIQUE 1 107 33720 1 1 33459 33720
NMI IDX_NMI_ID NONUNIQUE 2 6319 683370 1 2 1970460 1971313
NMI IDX_NMI_ID_NK NONUNIQUE 2 6597 1971293 1 1 1970771 1971313
NMI IDX_NMI_STATS NONUNIQUE 1 98 48 2 4 196 196
REGISTER REG_EFFECTIVE_DTM NONUNIQUE 2 15615 1273 12 2109 2685924 5886582
REGISTER SYS_C00116748 UNIQUE 2 19533 5886582 1 1 5845565 5886582
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK NONUNIQUE 2 4111 1795084 1 1 1758441 1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET IDX_SLA_SDP_SK NONUNIQUE 2 4003 674249 1 2 1787987 1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET SYS_C004520 UNIQUE 2 5864 1795130 1 1 1782147 1795130
SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER SYS_C004539 UNIQUE 2 20413 6152850 1 1 6073059 6152850
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 3227 660649 1 2 1422572 1447803
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT IDX_SDP_SAP_INT_NMI_SK NONUNIQUE 2 6399 646257 1 2 1346948 1349993
SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT SYS_C00128706 UNIQUE 2 4643 1447946 1 1 1442796 1447946
TEST ITEM 3 COMPARE PLANS
ENVIRONMENT A
Plan hash value: 4109575732
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 13 | 2067 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
| 1 | HASH UNIQUE | | 13 | 2067 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 13 | 2067 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:05 |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 6 | 900 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:04 |
|* 4 | HASH JOIN ANTI | | 1 | 137 | | 135K (2)| 00:27:03 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| NMI | 1 | 22 | | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 131 | | 95137 (2)| 00:19:02 |
|* 7 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 109 | | 95132 (2)| 00:19:02 |
|* 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ASSET | 36074 | 1021K| | 38553 (2)| 00:07:43 |
|* 9 | HASH JOIN | | 90361 | 7059K| 4040K| 56578 (2)| 00:11:19 |
|* 10 | HASH JOIN | | 52977 | 3414K| 2248K| 50654 (2)| 00:10:08 |
|* 11 | HASH JOIN | | 39674 | 1782K| | 40101 (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 39439 | 1232K| | 22584 (2)| 00:04:32 |
|* 13 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 4206K| 56M| | 17490 (2)| 00:03:30 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT | 675K| 12M| | 9412 (2)| 00:01:53 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET | 1178K| 15M| | 4262 (2)| 00:00:52 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_NMI_ID_NK | 2 | | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 17 | VIEW | | 39674 | 232K| | 40101 (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 18 | HASH JOIN | | 39674 | 1046K| | 40101 (2)| 00:08:02 |
|* 19 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 39439 | 500K| | 22584 (2)| 00:04:32 |
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 4206K| 56M| | 17490 (2)| 00:03:30 |
|* 21 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | METER_CONFIG_HEADER | 3658 | 47554 | | 19 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 22 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | METER_CONFIG_ITEM | 7590 | 68310 | | 112 (2)| 00:00:02 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK"="METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK")
3 - access("NETWORK_TARIFF_CD"="NETWORK_TARIFF_CD")
4 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="TMP"."SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
5 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND ("NMI_STATUS_CD"='A' OR "NMI_STATUS_CD"='D'))
7 - access("ASSET_CD"="EQUIP_CD" AND "SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK"="SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK")
8 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
9 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
10 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
11 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
12 - filter("REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND (SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='4' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='5' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='6') AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
13 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
14 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
15 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
16 - access("NMI_SK"="NMI_SK")
18 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
19 - filter("REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND (SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='1' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='2' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='3') AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
20 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
21 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
22 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND "CONROL_REGISTER"='X')
ENVIRONMENT B
Plan hash value: 2826260434
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 181 | 103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
| 1 | HASH UNIQUE | | 1 | 181 | 103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN ANTI | | 1 | 181 | 103K (2)| 00:20:47 |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 176 | 56855 (2)| 00:11:23 |
|* 4 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 163 | 36577 (2)| 00:07:19 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | ASSET | 1 | 44 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 131 | 9834 (2)| 00:01:59 |
| 7 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 87 | 9830 (2)| 00:01:58 |
| 8 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 74 | 9825 (2)| 00:01:58 |
|* 9 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 52 | 9820 (2)| 00:01:58 |
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| METER_CONFIG_HEADER | 1 | 14 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 33 | 116 (2)| 00:00:02 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | METER_CONFIG_ITEM | 1 | 19 | 115 (2)| 00:00:02 |
|* 13 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | SYS_C00116570 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT | 723K| 13M| 9699 (2)| 00:01:57 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | NMI | 1 | 22 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_NMI_ID_NK | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | SDP_LOGICAL_ASSET | 1 | 13 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_SLA_SDP_SK | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_A_SAPINTLOGDEV_SK | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 76113 | 2378K| 26743 (2)| 00:05:21 |
|* 21 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 5095K| 63M| 20245 (2)| 00:04:03 |
| 22 | VIEW | | 90889 | 443K| 47021 (2)| 00:09:25 |
|* 23 | HASH JOIN | | 90889 | 2307K| 47021 (2)| 00:09:25 |
|* 24 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | REGISTER | 76113 | 966K| 26743 (2)| 00:05:21 |
|* 25 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SDP_LOGICAL_REGISTER | 5095K| 63M| 20245 (2)| 00:04:03 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="TMP"."SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
3 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK" AND
"SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
4 - access("ASSET_CD"="EQUIP_CD")
5 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
9 - access("NETWORK_TARIFF_CD"="NETWORK_TARIFF_CD")
10 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
12 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND "CONROL_REGISTER"='X')
13 - access("METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK"="METER_CONFIG_HEADER_SK")
14 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
15 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y' AND ("NMI_STATUS_CD"='A' OR "NMI_STATUS_CD"='D'))
16 - access("NMI_SK"="NMI_SK")
17 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
18 - access("SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK"="SERVICE_DELIVERY_POINT_SK")
19 - access("SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK"="SAP_INT_LOG_DEVICE_SK")
20 - filter((SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='4' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='5' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='6') AND "REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
21 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
23 - access("SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK"="SAP_INT_LOGICAL_REGISTER_SK")
24 - filter((SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='1' OR SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='2' OR
SUBSTR("REGISTER_ID_CD",1,1)='3') AND "REGISTER_TYPE_CD"='C' AND "ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')
25 - filter("ROW_CURRENT_IND"='Y')Edited by: abhilash173 on Feb 24, 2013 9:16 PM
Edited by: abhilash173 on Feb 24, 2013 9:18 PMHi Paul,
I misread your question initially .The system stats are outdated in both ( same result as seen from aux_stats) .I am not a DBA and do not have access to gather system stats fresh.
select * from sys.aux_stats$
SNAME PNAME PVAL1 PVAL2
SYSSTATS_INFO STATUS NULL COMPLETED
SYSSTATS_INFO DSTART NULL 02-16-2011 15:24
SYSSTATS_INFO DSTOP NULL 02-16-2011 15:24
SYSSTATS_INFO FLAGS 1 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEEDNW 1321.20523 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN IOSEEKTIM 10 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN IOTFRSPEED 4096 NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN SREADTIM NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN MREADTIM NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN CPUSPEED NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN MBRC NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN MAXTHR NULL NULL
SYSSTATS_MAIN SLAVETHR NULL NULL -
Two different Resultsets for the same query (running at the same time)
I am using the Thin Driver for Oracle 8.1.6. I am invoking queries in multithreading mode (each thread has his own connection to the oracle DB). If i am invoking the same SQL-Statement in two different threads nearly at the same time, only the ResultSet of the first query is complete. The ResultSet of the second query is not complete (the number of tuples differs each time I run the program). Principally the two ResultSets should be the same (no changes are done at the same time in the DB), but they are not.
Anybody knows this problem and knows how to solve it? Principally read accesses on DBs should not make such trouble ...
I hope anybody can help me.Pranav,
As this BADI is having option checked 'Multiple use'. You can implement multiple implementations.
You need not to deactivate the existing implementation.
Reddy -
How to set up the inspection plan for the material in super BOM
Hello,
how to get the accurate inspection plan of the IQC for the material which was class item in a super BOM?
I've gotten the characteristic value from the sales order, and get the PO after MPR. The problem is how to specify the target value and the range of inspection characteristic in inspection plan, because the value is temporary?
Thanks!
LinHello,
I think you need to create MIC which linked with the configuration characteristic, and specify "inspection by configuration" for the inspection type.
then the configuration value in the sales order can be transfered to the inspection lot when production released or goods receipts if you use inspection type 03 or 04. that means the value range for the MIC will be determined dynamically for each sales order.
Regards, Winnie -
How to maintain two credit limits for the same customer.
We have two lines of business for the same company code. One customer is trading in two lines of business.
We want to maintain two credit limits for same customer. How is this possible.Hi,
Credit Limits are assigned to customer master in a credit control area, so a customer can have different credit limits for the different credit control areas.
(Please note that Credit Control Areas are normally assigned to company codes or sales area.)
But if you are having only one credit control area, then only one credit limit can apply.
However you can use the user exits to put any check you want for the customer. There are various user exits available for it like LVKMPTZZ,LVKMPFZ1,LVKMPFZ2 and LVKMPFZ3 in transaction SMOD
Regards,
Gaurav -
Is it possible to have two app icons for the same app?
I work with Assistive Technologies that enable people with various disabilites to use computing devices, such as the iPad. Some people do not have the fine motor skills to precisely tap the intended app icon. If I had a page full of app icons that launched the same app then I might have a workaround.
Thanks in advance,
Mike Leary
Information Technology Specialist
The Rural Institute - MonTECH
The University of Montana - MissoulaMike,
At the moment, no. The app store won't let you re-download an app already installed, and they all come in single icons.
The accessibility settings enable a zoom feature, but if your clients have difficulty tapping an app, they may have issues using three fingers simultaneously to zoom in/out.
There is a voice ability, but I've just spent the last 10 minutes playing with it and successfully called everyone in my phonebook (And i only wanted to open iBooks)
If you turn the iPad landscape you still have the same amount of apps on the page, just spaced out a little more, giving more margin for error/ But this still requires the same 'touch space area' to activate the app.
This might be something Apple could look at, with pressure from users such as yourself and your clients.
Hope this helps, even though it;s not really a solution -
Creating Two Different Designs for the same site
I already have a website (www.ernestbuckley) but would like to design an alternate site with the same name and from time to time, just switch between the two for variety. Can this be done? Will I lose any data when I switch back and forth?
Apnewbie's suggestion is right on track! You already have your domain name ( http://www.ernestbuckley.com ) that you forward to:
http://web.mac.com/ernestbuckley/iWeb/ernestbuckley/Welcome.html
If you made another parallel site with the different design and called it "ernest2", all you would have to do is to switch your forwarding to:
http://web.mac.com/ernestbuckley/iWeb/ernest2/
You can continue to edit both sites and when you want to switch sites, just change your forwarding again to the other address.
BTW, if you want to start another site, you might consider using a program called "iWebSites" to help you manage your sites in separate Domain files. That way you keep them completely separate from one another and maintain the ability to edit and publish them independently of one another. Here is the URL for more info...
http://mistergregg.com/cocoadrillosoftware/
Let me know if you any other questions... -
Two user IDs for the same person in SAP
Hi Experts,
The user has somehow got the Approval from the management to get Two USer ID In SAP CRM. Now requested for Access.
As per the Best Practice, One user should have only one SAP USER ID.
Since the User is a Managaer in Sales, we have assigned the Sales Business role, If he wants a Sales pro business role that can also be assigned. He has requested for Two seperate user ID in SAP.
I want to restrict him, and let the business know what would be the implications and causes.
Can some one help with the Disadvantages of having 2 user id for same user. So that we can let Business know about the implications and consequences it will create.
Please help with your view !!!!
Regards,
karthik J
Edited by: Julius Bussche on Mar 10, 2012 1:34 PM
CAPS-LOCK removed...Disadvantage.
1. Secure login for linking of SAP ID between your windows network id and SAP ID.
2. If allowed for two user ids in CRM system then he needs the same in ECC system also.
3. Trouble shooting issue in future.
Please note that, its all depend on the users justification and the requirement of the business.
Regards,
Shrinivasan. KV -
Hi All
Is it possible in IOS to have for a particular subnet:
a) Two static routes?
b) Make one static route a higher priority than the other?
c) If one static router "goes down", failover to the lower priority static route?
We have a l2tp/vpdn connection to a supplier which can be accessed via two vlans/routes. I would like to make one route the preferred one but the "route" to failover if the preferred route goes down.
Again, many thanks in advance for all responses!
Thanks
JohnHi John,
Hope the below explaination will help you...
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 3.3.3.3 10
If you notice the Administrative Distance for the secondary route pointing to ISP2 is increased to 10 so that it becomes the backup link.
The above configuration with just two floating static routes partially accomplishes our requirement as it will work only in the scenario where the routers interfaces connected to the WAN link are in up/down or down/down status. But in a lot of situations we see that even though the links remain up but we are not able to reach the gateway, this usually happens when the issue is at the ISP side.
In such scenarios, IP SLAs becomes an engineer's best friend. With around six additional IOS commands we can have a more reliable automatic failover environment.
Using IP SLA the Cisco IOS gets the ability to use Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) pings to identify when a WAN link goes down at the remote end and hence allows the initiation of a backup connection from an alternative port. The Reliable Static Routing Backup using Object Tracking feature can ensure reliable backup in the case of several catastrophic events, such as Internet circuit failure or peer device failure.
IP SLA is configured to ping a target, such as a publicly routable IP address or a target inside the corporate network or your next-hop IP on the ISP's router. The pings are routed from the primary interface only. Following a sample configuration of IP SLA to generate icmp ping targeted at the ISP1s next-hop IP.
R1(config)# ip sla 1
R1(config)# icmp-echo 2.2.2.2 source-interface FastEthernet0/0
R1(config)# timeout 1000
R1(config)# threshold 2
R1(config)# frequency 3
R1(config)# ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now
The above configuration defines and starts an IP SLA probe.
The ICMP Echo probe sends an ICMP Echo packet to next-hop IP 2.2.2.2 every 3 seconds, as defined by the “frequency” parameter.
Timeout sets the amount of time (in milliseconds) for which the Cisco IOS IP SLAs operation waits for a response from its request packet.
Threshold sets the rising threshold that generates a reaction event and stores history information for the Cisco IOS IP SLAs operation.
After defining the IP SLA operation our next step is to define an object that tracks the SLA probe. This can be accomplished by using the IOS Track Object as shown below:
R1(config)# track 1 ip sla 1 reachability
The above command will track the state of the IP SLA operation. If there are no ping responses from the next-hop IP the track will go down and it will come up when the ip sla operation starts receiving ping response.
To verify the track status use the use the “show track” command as shown below:
R1# show track
Track 1
IP SLA 1 reachability
Reachability is Down
1 change, last change 00:03:19
Latest operation return code: Unknown
The above output shows that the track status is down. Every IP SLAs operation maintains an operation return-code value. This return code is interpreted by the tracking process. The return code may return OK, OverThreshold, and several other return codes.
Different operations may have different return-code values, so only values common to all operation types are used. The below table shows the track states as per the IP SLA return code.
Tracking
Return Code
Track State
Reachability
OK or over threshold
(all other return codes)
Up
Down
The Last step in the IP SLA Reliable Static Route configuration is to add the “track” statement to the default routes pointing to the ISP routers as shown below:
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2 track 1
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 3.3.3.3 10
The track number keyword and argument combination specifies that the static route will be installed only if the state of the configured track object is up. Hence if the track status is down the secondary route will be used to forward all the traffic.
Please rate the helpfull posts.
Regards,
Naidu. -
Is it possible to have two SCCM instances for the same domain
Hello - I'm the IT Project Manager for an organization that has a single domain-production.
In here, we have an instance of SCCM 2012 setup. This instance is used to build packages, images, testing, validations, modifications etc. as well as for production roll outs. The primary issues we have with this is there is no separation between test and
prod, also, there are several packages, task sequences etc causing confusion in determining which is a test package and which is prod.
Setting up a test domain does not seem to be a viable option for us, at least for now.
So, my question is, can we have another instance of SCCM in the same domain that we can restrict only for the sake of testing & validations and then use the original one to deploy the tested (gold) packets.
Just a thought!! Does it make sense? Any challenges that we could face?
Thanks in advance
Jagan Pantina
JPHi,
Yes you can no problem, you should avoid having Boundary / Boundary Groups used for Site Assignment that overlap and make sure that PXE request to the test/dev environment is restricted to one test subnet to avoid co-existance issues.
Regards,
Jörgen
-- My System Center blog ccmexec.com -- Twitter
@ccmexec
Maybe you are looking for
-
Unwanted LOVs - Universe on a BEx query on top of a Multiprovider
BO XI 3.1 BW 7.01 OLAP Universe on a BEx query BEx query on top of a Multiprovider Multiprovider on 2 DSOs; lets say DSO1 and DSO2 BEx query has a global filter for "INFOPROVIDER = DSO1" BEx query has a user input variable defined for "Field1" (Field
-
In PSE11, how do I "crop" a photo into a circle?
I would greatly appreciate step-by-step instruction on how to "crop" a photo into a circle in PSE11. I've created an invitation for my daughters 1st birthday and I want to add a circular photo of her on the invite, but I can't seem to figure it out.
-
Can I play the Xbox 360 using my Macbook Screen, they make a cable that allows you to plug the xbox 360 into a VGA port, and they make a DVI to VGA connector, but is the DVI plug on the Macbook only an output?
-
Updating the Customer & Material Tax Classification via LSMW only
We need to update the Customer and Material Tax Classification via LSMW only, in such a way that on the updation of the Tax classifications the Customer Master and the Material Master should be updated automatically. Please let me know if anyone has
-
i'm getting this exception when the action servlet initializes. it looks like it has something to do with the oracle xml parsers or something. the same application war file works beautifully in tomcat 5. does anybody have any ideas? 05/06/03 17:11:45