Unplanned delivery cost picking rounding off value in sap miro

Dear Experts,
I have configured unplanned delivery costs to be posted to separate GL account. I have set the default tax code also. In OBYC i have set the frieght and transportation GL account against UPF transaction key. Now even though the user is not entering any value in unplanned delivery cost field, system  is automatically taking the rounding off values(manually entered by user to match the vendor invoice) from MIRO line item and is posting to the freight account.
Query -2 - while reversing the already posted MIRO document in MR8M the rounding of value  which has been taken automatically in unplanned delivery cost is showing in the error message as :
"Balance is not equal to zero: 0.35- inr"
please refer below screen shot for the error message
Please suggest.
Regards
Chinmaya

please read my blog it explains how to close a question, just replying "closed" does not do really this job
How to close a discussion and why

Similar Messages

  • How to achieve round off value in SAP?

    here I have given my Query ..I need to calculate rounding off value for this query..
    SELECT (CAST($[OBTN.U_Length] AS FLOAT)/CAST($[OBTN.U_Width] as FLOAT) *($[BTNT.Quantity]))

    Hi Karthick,
    I am not sure wheter I understood you, but are you searching for
    SELECT FLOOR((CAST($[OBTN.U_Length] AS FLOAT)/CAST($[OBTN.U_Width] as FLOAT) *($[BTNT.Quantity])))
    regards,
    Maik

  • Tax On Unplanned Delivery Cost

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a scenario.  vendor gives invoice on Unloading (when required) which is not included in PO pricing. We treat it as unplanned delivery cost. But service tax is applicable for this unplanned cost.
    Although PO contains service tax but during MIRO it is not being applicable to unplanned cost.
    Can you suggest how to get rid of this problem???
    Regards,
    santosh

    Hi,
    This is standard functionality of SAP.
    The logic SAP follows:
    (a) Unplanned delivery cost that needs to be posted during invoice verification gets apportioned to the base values of line items considered for invoice verification
    (b) Since the Tax is always calculated on the base values of the line items, the tax also calculated on apportioned unplanned delivery cost.
    (c) There are no Configuration or User exits available to avoid calculation of tax on unplanned delivery cost.
    You can use following workaround solutions to meet your requirement of loading unplanned delivery costs to material value:
    (a) Posting unplanned delivery costs directly to Material value. This is achieved by allowing direct posting to Material at MIRO.
    (b) Post-unplanned delivery costs as subsequent debit memo using MIRO. Here, you can choose the relevant tax code based on the requirement
    (c) The unplanned delivery costs entered at the time of Invoice verification will be posted to separate GL account without calculating taxes on it.
    Bye,
    Muralidhara

  • Unplanned delivery costs in FB60

    Hello friends,
    We are on release ECC 5.0.
    Is there a field for Unplanned delivery costs in FB60 like there is for MIRO?  If no, how are things such as freight charges handled in FB60?  Are they done through a direct posting to a freight G/L account?
    Thanks...will award points.
    Linda

    Hi,
    Good evening and greetings,
    There is no option in FB60 and you have to enter it posting directly to the GL account in the document.
    Please reward points if found useful
    Thanking you
    With kindest regards
    Ramesh Padmanabhan

  • Unplanned delivery cost will lead to negative value

    Hi everyone,
    i have this issue.  I m trying to cancel an incoice document from MR8M.When i do that i get a message: No m8281, unplanned delivery cost will lead to negative value.
    Can someone help me with this? what do i need to do?
    Regards

    Hi,
    This problem is caused by a program error.
    Refer the notes 1377622, 992146
    You use transaction MIRO "Enter Incoming Invoice" to enter an invoice that has a reference to a purchase order. Based on your Customizing settings, the unplanned delivery costs are distributed to the individual items.
    1. You enter negative unplanned delivery costs on the "Details" tab page. The negative unplanned delivery costs lead to a negative invoice amount.
                  The system does not issue error message M8 281 "Unplanned delivery costs will lead to negative value".
                  Negative invoice values (EKBE-WRBTR, EKBE-DMBTR) are written in the purchase order history. This results in an error in transaction MCE7 "Material Analysis (PURCHIS): Selection".
    2. You post a subsequent credit. You enter unplanned delivery costs on the "Details" tab page. The unplanned delivery costs lead to a negative total invoice amount.
                  The system does not issue error message M8 281 "Unplanned delivery costs will lead to negative value".
                  The negative total invoice amount (the total of EKBE-WRBTR or EKBE-DMBTR) leads to an unexpected distribution of unplanned delivery costs for the next invoice document.
    (SAP Customizing Implementation Guide -> Materials Management -> Logistics Invoice Verification -> Incoming Invoice -> Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted)
    Other terms
    Negative, delivery costs (DLC), bnkan_fw, rewwr, M8 281, rewrt
    Reason and Prerequisites
    This problem is caused by a program error.
    Solution
    The Support Package for Releases 4.70, 5.00, 6.00, 6.02, 6.03 and 6.04 corrects this error.
    Advance correction: implement the correction instructions.
    Header Data

  • Limiting value for unplanned delivery cost

    Hi,
    I want to set up a limiting value for unplanned delivery cost ( Say the unplanned delivery cost should not exceed 10% of the total invoice value ).
    How to achieve this functionality.
    Regards,
    R. Dillibabu.

    Hello,
    There are no checks for unplanned delivery cost and you should explore the possibility of user exits to implement this functionality.
    Cheers !

  • Unplanned Delivery Costs and Price Variance - Account Determination

    Hi,
    I am facing the following issue:
    My goal is to automatic post the unplanned delivery costs to an account depending on valuation class.
    The account should be diferent from the one used in purchase (EIN)  post but both values should affect the moving price.
    Can we do that?
    Thank you for your cooperation
                   Best Regards
                     João Fernandes

    My take is that you can have or the other, not both.
    You configure how the uplanned costs are handled, a) Distributed among invoice Items or b) to a different G/L line.
    Path : SPRO>MM>LIV>Incoming Invoice
    If you pick, the costs goes to the stock account.
    If you pick B, the cost goes to a separate account but it will not affect the item price.
    The account is defined in OBYC, for transaction UPF, and it is Valuation class independent.
    Hope it  helps

  • Question on unplanned delivery costs need to go to GL account ????

    Hello
    I have a question regarding unplanned deliver costs. I am a FI analyst  Can you please explain my how I can solve my problem . My user wants unplanned delivery costs to go in to the GL account .
    In MM account determination GL account is set up but when I am doing MIRO
    . I am putting  total amount in amount field and freight costs in unplanned field under ‘detail ‘ section.
    When I simulate it gives me ‘tax code ‘ related warning when I hit enter it credit vendor and debits  GR/IR clearing and some debit  to inventory  account but not  to freight account,
    What’s  the problem. Can someone explain me :
    1)     What do I need to do to make it go to GL account ( account is set up but what is tax code related error . how do I fix that,
    2)     How does unplanned delivery costs work if I have tax, discount and freight.
    3)     Is tax calculated off total amount (inventory + freight) and discount too. How can I prevent that so that my tax is calculated just on inventory amount?
    4)     DO I have to put total in amount field (meaning inventory amount + fright ) or not .
    I will be grateful if someone can guide me towards right direction. Please give me a detailed answer. How does it work???
    Thanks
    Kavita Reddy

    in standard setting the freight amount gets debit in the stock or inventoy account and gets credit in the fright accoutn at the time fo gr so it means the amount of frieght is gettting invenotrised
    now at the time of IV IN MIRO SYSTEM CREDITS THE VENDOR ACCOUNT AND DEBITS THE GR/IR account
    if u want to settele the planned delivery cost then select the laout variant for the planned delivery at item level
    or in case if u want to make use of the unplanned delivery cost then u r doing the right step
    but as u simulate the g/l accounts sytem will debit the inventory or stock account for it  rather then frieght account (i belive so )
    as the uplanned delivery cost may be getting inventorised that is added to the material price
    and as u said u dont want to have tax calulated on the unplanned delivery cost then i suggest u to post it as subsequent debit and there do not make use of the claulate tax option or do the direct posting for the g/l account option

  • Unplanned Delivery costs in MIRO for different Vendor

    I have an annual PO and I invoice it with normal MIRO transaction.
    At the same time I have one service which I want to be a unplanned delivery cost for this PO. This service will be assigned to the material account and it is for a different vendor.
    Can I do it in MIRO creating only the value in the unplanned delivery cost and insert a different vendor? In OBYC this is assigned to UPF category.
    Can you please help me?

    Hello,
    You can use transaction MIRO to do unplanned delivery costs.
    You use "Subsequent Debit" and insert the PO number (equal to invoice). The system will show the lines of the PO that were already invoiced and in the tab "Details" you should change the Invoice Party and inser the value of the unplanned delivery costs in the field "Unpl. Del. Csts".
    If you don't have the costs in the PO for different vendor you must create like this...with Subsequent Debit. Only if you have planned costs in the PO it is possible to do it invoice and costs in the same document for different vendors otherwise you must have 2 documents (invoice for the material vendor and subsequent debit for the other unplanned costs vendor).

  • Unplanned Delivery Costs in Invoice Verification

    Hiii All ,
    I am getting an error " Balance in Transaction Currency " when i give the Unplanned delivery costs. The configuration that i made is Unplanned delivery costs should be added to the Invoice Items. This comes when i am posting the Planned delivery costs i.e freight Conditions. Please suggest me if any configuration is missing.
    Regards,
    Kumar

    Hi,
    You appear to be adding Planned AND unplanned delivery charges somehow????
    If you have entered freight conditions on the PO and if that freight cost is being captured during GR (as you indicate by the value of 110 at GR stage)  then why are you entering unplanned delivery costs as well?
    You should be simply selecting the option "goods/service items + Planned delivery costs" from the pull down list in the centre -right of the MIRO screen (if the delivery costs are included on the same invoice and vendor). the total value for the invoice amount should be entered as 110, (If you are ONLY entering the planned delivery costs then select this option and ONLY enter 10 as the invoice amount) but there is no reason to enter ANYTHING in the unplanned delivery costs field because these are PLANNED delivery costs.
    Or are you saying that there are unplanned costs on top of the planned costs? In which case the invoice amount should be 10 PLUS the unplanned costs.
    Steve B

  • Unplanned delivery costs in MIRO

    Hi,
    In what scenario we use "Unplanned delivery costs" in MIRO.
    We created the Purchase Order and did the goods receipts. At the time of Vendor Invoicing, we came to know that we forgot to enter freight value in the Purchase Order. We don't want to reverse the goods receipt, and we want to rectify the error in the MIRO. What is the best way to do this.
    I have explored the various possibility in MIRO like,
    a. putting freight amount in  Unplanned delivery costs of Details tab.
    b. putting the freight amount directly in the G/L (below in the G/L Account tab).
    I just want to know "should we stop the users to do the mistakes in future (our user is saying - the SAP has given the option, hence we must use this). Our user is saying that he is not aware of the freight amount at the time of PO creation, hence he will not enter the freight value in the Purchase Order and will use the Unplanned delivery costs for entering the freight always.
    Regards,
    PK

    >
    PK wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > In what scenario we use "Unplanned delivery costs" in MIRO.
    >
    > We created the Purchase Order and did the goods receipts.
    At the time of Vendor Invoicing, we came to know that
    we forgot to enter freight value in the Purchase Order.
    We don't want to reverse the goods receipt, and
    we want to rectify the error in the MIRO. What is the best way to do this.
    > I have explored the various possibility in MIRO like,
    >
    > a. putting freight amount in  Unplanned delivery costs of Details tab.
    > b. putting the freight amount directly in the G/L (below in the G/L Account tab).
    >
    > I just want to know "should we stop the users to do the
    mistakes in future (our user is saying - the SAP has given the option,
    hence we must use this). *Our user is saying that he is
    not aware of the freight amount at the time of PO creation,
    hence he will not enter the freight value in the
    Purchase Order and will use the Unplanned
    delivery costs for entering the freight always*.
    >
    > Regards,
    > PK
    If freight amount is only know at the billing then enter freight amount in unplanned delivery cost field.
    In SPRO ,Maintain settings as shown
    MM---> Logistic Invoice Verification -->Incoming Invoice --> Configure How unplanned delivery costs are posted --->
    For required Company Code = '2'.
    Create new g/l account in Chart of accounts(FS00)

  • Query-Unplanned delivery cost

    Dear All,
    This is regarding Unplanned delivery Cost:
    I make an PO of a Material of 15000 Qty in which PO Value  is calculated excluding Freight charges   .
    But while doing GRN I comes to Know the Freight charges. Let us say 500 Rs but this is for 10000 Quantity (Here the vendor is different (Transporter)).whereas 5000 Qty will come later on.
    So i have configured that during GRN Vendor can be changed. or for this USer will Go into Change PO mode and will put the freight charges as 500
    But this freight charges is distributed on 15000 quantity whereas actually i want that this freight charges can be uploaded on 10000 Quantity.
    How it can be handled ?
    Whereas when next time when i receive remaining (5000 Quantity) at that time freight is 200 Rs (For eg)
    How it will be uploaded on 5000 quantity.
    Can it be possible that i ask the user to put 1 Rs as nominal value in FRB1 for (transporter as Vendor)
    And after doing MIGO  out of this 1 Rs proportanately distribute this value on 10000 qty  (lets say 0.75 Rs )
    And while doing MIRO I select the PO no and Planned deliver cost where in it will show quantity as
    10000 and freight value as 0.75 (Here i will put the actual Freight)  But in this case if i put the actual freight it gets uploaded on Freight G/L.
    Is it possible that the freight gets uploaded on Items which i am purchasing?
    If i dont put the actual value instead of 0.75 and instead of that can i put this value in Unplanned delivery cost. But i think if i put the Unplanned delivery cost as 500 Rs ,system is showing me only the Credit amount of Rs 500 on Vendor and on freight acct as 0.75 
    i.e   Transporter is getting credited by 500 Rs
    and only Freight acct is getting debited by 0.75
    balance 499.25 Rs it is not showing at all.
    CAN U PLZ GUIDE ME ON THIS ????
    REgards
    Shailesh

    Hi,
    Why dont u put the charges directly in MIRO rather than modifying the PO. This way u can distribute ur charges as per quantity
    Thanks,
    Sourabh

  • Post unplanned delivery cost to different freight G/L Accounts

    Hi,
    Regarding the freight costs the business process is at  the time Purchase Order creation, the company does not know what is the freight costs that is going to be charged by the vendor. The freight charges will be known when the vendor sends the Invoice. The purchase order contains the materials to be drop shipped by vendor directly to customer or cross dock delivery to company premises.
    The business requirement is when the MIRO invoice is posted, user will enter the freight charges at the document header level and that value needs to be split among the PO Line items and needs to be posted to separate Freight Cost G/L Accounts based on the account assignment category. For drop ship items the freight cost to be posted to one G/L Account and for cross dock items it needs to be posted to a different G/L Account. Later on this freight cost to be applied to customer invoice for charging the customer with the vendor freight cost.
    The solution option we have considered is to define two statistical freight condition types at PO Level (one to be triggered for Drop ship materials and the other to be for Cross dock items), in the pricing procedure assign two different Account keys to these condition types. At MIRO users enters the freight cost as unplanned delivery cost, write the code in a user exit to split this value among the freight line items of the MIRO invoice. As separate Account keys are assigned to the condition types the values can be posted to separate G/Ls. To bring these values to customer invoice we will develop a custom routine in SD pricing procedure.
    Request the experts to let me know if there is any simple way to map this requirement.
    Thanks & Regards,
    GLN.

    Hi,
    As at the time of the PO you do not know the freight costs and you want to post the freight costs in the MIRO as unplanned delivery costs . and there is no way you have to post as unplanned .
    Here your requirements are 1. Post to separate GL accounts and 2. distribution among line items .
    However both of your requirements are given with sap standard functionality with the below sap  link .
    Logistics Invoice Verification (MM-IV-LIV) - SAP Library
    check spro--mm--liv--incoming invoice ---configure how unplanned delivery costs are treated .
    at the same time when you maintain the condition type for frieght iN PO , they will become the planned delivery costs . if this come in to picture FR/IR account will come into the pictute at GR and IR .
    i think your requirement will be partially met . and the coding part may become fuzzy rather to go with the standard.
    Regards,

  • Regarding rounding off value in pricing procedure

    hi fi professionals,
    i have an issue regarding pricing procedure, pls help me out, its urgent
    i have a condition type, zrou(rounding off value)
    the fanda is- when i am creating po- my net value is suppose- 19.90.
    so my client requirement is- 0.10
    so i have given 0.10, then total value is- 20.00
    but this value is not pickin up in migo- accounting document
    it is picking 19.90 only.
    so what is the configuraion needed in omsy for picking up the total value in accounting doc.
    regards,
    susanta

    Hi..
    You would need to maintain a account key in the pricing procudure which would calculate the balance to make the total a rounded value.
    In FI perspective, you need to assign a GL account for that..
    Cheers
    Raghu

  • Unplanned delivery costs

    Our main vendor is a ERS vendor and freight vendor is  without ERS.
    We have some freight related condition types in PO and maintained freight vendor in the same.
    We are running ERS for main vendor and arranging payment to freight vendor with MIRO.
    As far as there is no change in planned delivery cost it is working fine.
    But if there is any change in delivery costs, we want to post the unplanned delivery cost to material through MIRO, when we do i.v. for freight vendor first time.
    if we select the option "2", i.e. post the unplanned delivery cost to the GL a/c assigned in OBYC, it is working fine.  But with the first option i.e. distribute the unplanned delivery costs to line items, it is giving error that "Balance in transaction currency"
    We are selecting "Planned delivery cost" option in MIRO.
    If main vendor is not a ERS vendor and if we do MIRO with "Goods + Planned delivery costs", the unplanned delivery cost is being posted to material cost, with the same configuration.
    For avoiding balance in transaction currency error in our scenario, what is the solution?  Do we need to configure anything more?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi
    To post the unplanned delivery costs to the Item you have to define how it should be apportioned to the invoiced items.( under Logistics Invoice Verification )
    You can post these types of unplanned delivery costs only after the invoice is posted.
    unplanned delivery costs are distributed among the invoiced items in proportion to the total invoiced values in the current invoice

Maybe you are looking for

  • My 5th Gen. iPod won't charge

    I recently got my iPod replaced when the screen was cracked. So I got a brand new one and a yesterday it wouldn't charge. It worked fine for about a month. I didn't get a new cable, I kept the one I had that worked fine. I plug it in and it just won'

  • F110/ FBZP - maximum amount paid per Vendor in Payment run

    Hi How do i create payment run where i want to restrict the maximum paid to a vendor per transaction. If amount exceeds this, i still wish to pay, but to split over more than one payment order Our BACS payments are now being processed via FASTER PAYM

  • Changing the table-color

    I built a Master/Detail application using Dreamweaver Developer Toolbox. I would like to change the gray color of the tables to other colors that are more suitable to my site. Is there anybody that can help me accomplish that ? Amanda Nguyen

  • Regarding ALV using OOPS Concept

    Hi Experts, Can abody explain to me how can i disable some settings in the tool bar of ALV Grid using oops concept??

  • Does Adobe Access DRM work on Roku?

    Does Adobe Access DRM work on Roku? If not, is there support planned for it in the near future ? The Adobe Primetime press release states Roku as a supported platform. Does this mean Adobe Access DRM will be supported on Roku ? Thanks, - Abey