Unwanted automatic confirmation of transfer order

I am kind of out of good ideas. The problem is following:
I pick for production orders to fixed bins using several different WM movement types. When I am low on stock the production orders then cannibalizes on each other when picking in background. I dont have "propose confirmation" set in any of the WM movement types concerned.
2 pcs are in interim storage type 914, then I generate a transfer order for interim storage type 924 (copy of 914), which picks from 914 and confirms automatically.
thanks for any ideas of what else to check.

the thing I need to understand is:
1. why does the transfer order pick from another interim storage type in background.
2. why does this type of movement between interims auto-confirm

Similar Messages

  • Automatic Confirmation of Transfer Order

    I have the following Scenario.
    I have 3 Warehouses defined, 1 for Reception material, 2 for finished goods. And it supoused to have the same configuration parameters.
    WH number 100 (Reception material area) when I do a movement with  MB1A mvt type 201 or 261, and generate the TO via LT06, the TO is not confirmed.
    But with the WH numbers 200 and 300 (finished goods area) doing the same example, Txn MB1A mov types 201 or 261, and generate the TO via LT06, the TO is automatically confirmed.
    I just check the Automatic COnfirmation section and for the 3 Warehouse have same parameters.
    What could be affecting?  Will exist a user exit to control this?

    Hi Marco,
    Please check SAP online help how confirmation is controlled:
    Please also check help in IMG:
    SPRO > LE > WM > Activities > Confirmation
    You will see that confirmation is coontrolled trough:
    - warehouse ID (whether 2-step confirmation is allowed)
    - storage type
    - movement type
    If your settings at movement type are the same and you experience different behaviour in your WHs, please check your settings of storage types.
    SPRO > LE > WM > Activities > Confirmation - Storage type
    You have to check settings of destinaton storage types (910; 914) in WH 100, 200, 300 as well as settings of source storage types.
    If there's no difference please check transacton LT06 itself - if you execute it in foreground mode it is possible to put a flag in confirmation checkbox.
    Please also check user exits in SE38. Here you can find list of possible user exits:
    SPRO > LE > WM > Tools > Develop User Exits for WM
    ...or please switch to debug mode and check from where confirmation req. comes...

  • Auto Confirmation of transfer order - 999 mvt from storage type W01 to S01

    I am trying to automate the confirmation of transfer orders between storage type W01 and S01 using a 999 movement type. The 999 movement type appears to work perfectly when doing a bin to bin movement within the W01 storage type (for example move batch abc from bin 01 to bin 02) no confirmations are required. However if I transfer from a bin in W01 storage type to the S01 storage type (which only has a single bin to represent a staging area) a manual confirmation of the transfer order is required via lt24 or lt12. It appears therefore that the issue is with the storage type S01 for this particular Warehouse. The setting to confirm the TO immediately is already activated for movt 999 in customizing, is there a setting for the storage type that must be defined.

    F1 help for field V_T333-SQUIT:
    Means that the transfer order item can be confirmed immediately during the creation procedure.
    SAP online help:
    To set the confirmation requirement for foreground processing, select the indicator for TO item can be confirmed immediately.
    As per my understanding the immediate confirmation indicator does not mean that the transfer order will be confirmed immediately. It makes possible that during the creation of transfer order you CAN put a flag in the confirmation checkbox.
    If you use it together with "propose confirmation" flag (setting for WM movement type; V_T333-VQUIT), the falg in confirmation check box will be populated automatically during TO creation.
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on May 10, 2011 11:22 AM

  • Error in confirmation of Transfer orders at Header level (TC LRF2)

    Hello All,
    A transfer order has single item.  It has got confirmed at the item level for the full quantity.  The confirmation switchbox at item level is checked in by the system automatically.  But in header level the switch box is not checked in.
    While trying to confirm the Transfer order at header level, the error message shows that the Transfer order is already confirmed.  But the Transfer order still exists in LRF2.
    Thanks in Advance.

    Hi Marcos
    Note 566995 is an old correction note, which is probably already implemented on your system but it describes the standard system design regarding confirmations posted in mass processing transactions:
    When you enter an operation confirmation via the order info system or the mass processing the system now sets the confirmation type to 'Automatic final confirmation' as well as the indicator 'Post open reservations'. Thus the system automatically generates a final confirmation when you confirm the whole planned quantity and the operation receives status CNF (finally confirmed) instead of PCNF (partially confirmed).
    System is designed that way because a mass processing transaction will be generally executed in background mode and a huge number of confirmations can be posted at the same time. Therefore, user will not be able to enter any value to the confirmation.
    If you don't want this behaviour you could use the BAPI
    BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_HDR to develop your own mass processing transaction to post confirmations.

  • Automatic creation of Transfer Order when a delivery is created

    Hi all ,
    I wanted to have Automatic creation of Transfer Order when a delivery is created ,
    what are the configuration activities that needs to be carried out .
    Thanks ,

    Dear Friends,
    I am also facing the same problem; I want the system to create a transfer order at the time of creation of an outbound delivery.
    I have done customization as under:
    Step 001
    Logistics Execution > Shipping > Basic Shipping Functions > Output Control > Output Determination > Maintain Output Determination for Outbound Deliveries > Maintain Output Determination Procedure
    Step 002
    On the screen, u201CProcedureu201D: Overview, choose the following:
    Procedure     Description
    V10000     Header Output
    Step 003
    On the screen, u201CControl datau201D: Overview, enter the following:
    Usage     Application     Procedure     Step number
    B     V2                     V10000     110
    Counter     Condition Type     Requirement     Description
    01     WMTA                     032                     Automatic TA
    The system does not create a transfer order automatically.
    May I request our learned friends to guide me?

  • Automatic creation of Transfer order for Picking and putaway

    Hello All .
    I would appreciate if someone can explain the process of configuring Automatic creation of Transfer order for Picking ( outbound delivery)and putaway( inbound delivery)  .

    To have transfer orders created automatically in the background, you must first set the indicator Automatic transfer order creation for each respective movement type in the Customizing application for Warehouse Management under the path <b>Activities - Transfers - Define Movement Types</b>. The system automatically copies this indicator into the header item of the source document.
    For more information on how to set up automatic transfer order creation for transfer requirements and posting change notices, refer to the IMG for Warehouse Management under the path <b>Activities - Transfers- Set up Autom</b>. TO Creation for TR/Posting Change Notices.
    You can find more details on this link
    Thanks & Regards

  • Confirming a Transfer Order for RF

    I am trying to find a BAPI or function module that will confirm a transfer order for use with a RF device.  We have tried using a BDC, but it is too unreliable because of the limit on the number of handling units that it can do at 1 time from the same bin.  If you have a way of confirming 30 or more handling units using transaction LT12 in a BDC, I will try that as well.
    Edited by: Paul Sullivan on Jun 3, 2008 5:36 PM

    Hello ,
    you could try with BAPI_SHIPMENT_CHANGE,
    but it's released and not documented. So, it's at own risk.
    Regards Wolfgang

  • User exits for delivery picking confirmation and transfer order creation

    We have a scenario for which we need help.
    This is to do with replenishment from plant to plant.
    We have sales sets.
    The sales sets needs to be replenished from one plant to another. We want the componenets of the sales sets to picked from the issuing plant. For this we need a transfer order. this needs tobe confirmed and then the goods issue should take place from the issuing plant. Its a two step process.
    we are doing Sales sets in STO. The explosion takes place in STO. However when we create deliveries for this. Only the sales set header item without its components are flowing into the delivery.
    The Tranfer order does not contain the components either.
    However post  the goods issue we  can create a TO with reference to the TR. This is is not acceptable because we want the picking and confirmation to occur before PGI from the issuing plant.
    Could anybody help: We want the TO to be created with the components even though in the delivery only the Sales set header appears. Can u suggest a user exit in which when we create the TR from the delivery the components of the set.
    After confirmation of the TO then we want the picking status to be put as C.

    Check the following users exits.
    MWMRFSSG            user exit for sorting TOs in RF system-guided transaction
    MWMRFUP             Customer defined general purpose pushbutton called from scr.
    MWMRP001            Cust. Exit for Fixed Bin Replenish.: Delivery Item Selection
    MWMRP002            Cust. Exit for Fixed Bin Replenishment: TR Quantity Distr.
    MWMRP003            Customer Exit for Replenishment using RLLNACH1
    MWMRP004            User Exit for Replenishment using RLLNACH4
    MWMTO001            Enhancements for end of transfer order generation
    MWMTO010            Exit: Calculation of Total Planned TO Processing Time
    MWMTO011            Correction of Planned Processing Time for TO Item
    MWMTO012            Correction of Sorting and Split Transfer Order
    MWMTO013            Stock Removal for Sev. Storage Types as in Stringent FIFO
    MWMTOAU3            Separate selection of posting changes for autom.TO creation
    MWMTR001            Exits at the end of transfer rqmnt creation (IM,PP interf.)
    MWMD0001            Transfer order print via RLVSDR40
    MWMD0002            Transfer order print as multiple process with RLKOMM40
    MWMIDI07            Enhancement for Output WMPIHU (Create Pick-HU) Inbound
    MWMIDO11            Enhancement for message WMTORD: TO with several items
    MWMIDO12            Enhancement for Output WMPIHU (Pick-HUs) Outbound
    MWMIDO13            Extension for WMMBXY (subsequent tasks after goods movement)
    MWMPP001            Enhancement WM/PP Interface (automatic TR generation)

  • Order Confirmation (PM) & Transfer Order (WM)

    Hi all,
    following this path
    SPRO > Logistics Execution > Warehouse Management > Interfaces Inventory > Management > Activate Automatic TO Creation
    we have activated the automatic TO creation.
    We have maintained the value "X" in the column "Indicator: Create transfer order immediately" for all the Movement types. Indeed, creating a good issue (from MIGO transaction) the system offers the OT screen.
    But creating a good issue from the IW41 transaction (Create PM Order Confirmation) the system behaves differently.
    How I can align the two behaviors? I don't want to retain the MM stock misaligned compared to the WM stock.
    Edited by: Marco Cariello on Jul 14, 2009 12:36 PM

    How I can align the two behaviors? I don't want to retain the MM stock misaligned compared to the WM stock.
    Generally, you cannot cause inconsistency between IM and WM stock via simple GI posting. If you detach your WH from an operating IM SLoc, you can cause...(just one example)
    Is WM/PP interface switched on?
    If yes, no TO is generated at the time of GI - SAP directly consumes it from the interim storage type 100. Reason is that TO creation is before GI in this case: TR is generated (e.g.) at the release of PrdOrd and processing that TR from LB10, you get the TO.
    SPRO > LE > WM > Interfaces > Define Prdouction
    I'm not sure but it can be a possible cause of the behaviour of the system you face...

  • Automatic creation of transfer orders from goods receipt of purchase order.

    Hi experts
    The project i am currently working on requires the following;
    When goods receipting a purchase order i have a requirement for the system to create automatic transfer orders to put the stock away into storage bins.  I am aware that the stock goes straight into the 902 area once goods receipted.  Is it possible to have the transfer orders created automatically out of 902 once the goods receipt has been posted.
    In support of this, i have made an entry in transaction OMKX for the following;
    Reference Movement Type - 101
    Movement Indicator - B (goods movement for purchase order)
    Movement Type - 101
    TR Create Transfer requirement - X
    Immed. TO Creation - A
    Addl Data - X
    Once i receipt the PO it just sits in 902 and does not create any automatic transfer orders.
    Could someone please help me

    Please try to process the material document of the GR manually by LT06 in foreground to find out the root cause of the error.
    You may also want to setup the mail control (V_T321-MAILK) for immediate TO creation in OMKX. The system will send you a express message (depending on your setup) if TO creation is failed.

  • Automatically confirmation in process order

    Hello everybody.
    Is there a way of confirm (TR. COR6N) a operation in a process order automatically?
    I mean, in my process orders I want that some operation (not all) been confirm with the standard duration. 
    Thanks in advance.

    For operations you want to confirm automatically, maintain a control key which is not milestone confirmation & which has confirmation as optional. Maintain a milestone confirmation enabled control key at the end, so once you confirm this operation all previous operations are automatically confirmed.
    Eg: Operations - 0010, 0020, 0030, 0040.
    For operation 0010 & 0020 if you maintain as confirmation as optional & for operation 0030 as milestone confirmation. Now when you confirm 0030, operations 0010 & 0020 are confirmed automatically.
    To check control key details you can go to OPJ8.
    Test the above in your sandbox & adopt if it meets your need.

  • Automatic confirmation in process order

    Hello everybody.
    I need made automatic confirmation to some phases in process order, I hade read that this is possible using process messages.
    Process management supports the direct confirmation from the PI sheet and process control system to the process order by sending process messages to predefined message destinations.
    Someone know what are the steps I need to follow to customize process message?
    What are the transactions that I need to use?
    In some documentation say that for access process management, I need proceed as follows:
    From the main R/3 menu, select the menu options Logistics u2192 Production - process u2192 Process management.
    The system branches to the initial process management menu. From here, you can access all the application functions of process management.
    But when I access that path there is not any transaction for use process management.
    Something is missing for install or what is the transaction that I need use?
    Thanks in advance.

    You can do that in T Code CORW.
    For the required production scheduler select the batch creation for process order.
    Also in the Assignment tab of the process order, there is a field for batch, next to it there is a Create button. Click that, you will get the batch number in that field.
    Hope that helps.
    Added: I apologise, its not the Assignment tab in process order. It is Goods Receipt tab.
    Edited by: Rohit Chauhan on Aug 3, 2009 9:42 AM

  • Automatic Generartion of Transfer Order

    Dear SAP Prof,
    How Automatic Transfer order is created The moment Delivry is SAVED....?
    Is their any configuration settings have to be done......?
    Please Suggests me for the above querry...

    Dear Friend ,
    This can be configured in the schedule line level....
    In the Schedule line mention the Order type : Your transfer order: This is the feild for the purchase order ,
    So at the time of Delivery the system will prompt the TO and the required feilds will be entered and the delivery as well as the trasfer order can be created....
    Suggest me whether it worked.
    Amlan Sarkar

  • Sales Order which automatically creates Stock Transfer Order

    Hi All,
    I've the following configuration requirement....
    -- A semifinished good SF1 will come to my company plant... (Stock Transfer)
    -- This SF1 will get converted to SF2 (another semifinished good) inside my company. As a by-product Scrap S1 will be generated.
    -- This SF2 will be transfered to vendor for external processing and producing Finished Good FG.
    -- This FG will go to customer directly from the vendor.
    My requirement is to create third party sales order for FG which in turn trigger PR->PO for FG. This will trigger a stock transfer for SF2 from plant to vendor. For this it will trigger a stock transfer of SF1 from plant (outside) to plant (my company). All this needs to happen when I save sales order for FG. Once the FG is saved, if I go to MD04 (stock requirements list), it should show stock transfer order for SF1, stock transfer order for SF2.
    Now I've created SF1, SF2, S1 and FG in material master. Also created Customer C1 and other necessary details such as organizational units, partners etc.
    Also I've created BOM for SF2 which includes SF1 and S1 and another BOM for FG which includes SF2 only.
    At this moment when I create a sales order for FG and save (third party sales order), the PR is getting generated for FG. But for further levels of processing is not happening. I know that manually these stock transfers could be done. But I want this to happen automatically when I save the sales order for FG.
    Please let me know what would be the ways to configue this.
    Thanks in advance.

    As per your thread,
    1- SF1 transferred from Plant (P1)- to Plant (P2) - Cab ne mapped through STO Process / Transfer Posting from Plant-Plant(Mov type 301)
    2- for this SF1, internal processing will be done in Plant-P2 to convert SF1 into SF2 in resuitl Scrap S1 will generate- Internal Production process (SF1 BOM - SF2 & S1 as child items)
    3- Issuing SF2 to Vendor for further processing to convert into FG - Subcontracting Process ( SF2 - Input Material / FG - Output material)
    4- Issuing FG directly from Vendor to Customer, based on Customer Order - Third party Order Processing.
                    As you know, through Configuration its difficult to achieve this. You may need to use the BAPI's to auto trigger these process one after the other. Still you should check feasibility.

  • Customized RF transaction for Confirmation of Transfer Order for WM

    Hello everyone !
    I need to develop a customized RF transaction for tcode LM05 and LT11. where i need to call custome screens for
    1. Select transfer order - ( which will fetched from any handheld device like BARCODE scanner )
    2. Navigate to screen SOURCE INFORMATION - Multiple Materials on pressing on NEXT button the control goes to
    3. Destination Information - Multiple Materials and on ENTER pushbutton the TO gets confirmed.
    Basically i need to create ZLM05 and do the above.
    Please can any one provide the steps to achieve the above funcitonality ,
    Thanks & Regards,


Maybe you are looking for