Update book inventory with NEW company code assignment for the same site

Hi gurus ,
Our company have this business scenario:
the site has run in Company Code A for several month with business of Material Management function, then the site have to be changed to Company Code B for financial requirement .
What we want is we change the CC assignment by OX18 for site master without changing the site number (creating a new site master ),except for the open purchasing or sales document clearance , is there any way we can update the book inventory with new profit center corresponding to the CC B ?
Thanks in advance ,
Ryan

Actually we have made some discussion with SAP consultant about this requirement ,and they suggest the same thing ,but for many reasons ,we need to make it that way ,and we also made some test for this direct changing by OX18 for new CC assignment .
All other questions are under control now , for financial reason ,we need to update the book inventory to new CC assignment (new profit center after site-specific material master changed ) in some batch session or program ,any idea for this?

Similar Messages

One controlling area with two company codes assigned with one CoA

Hi,
I   am having one controlling area with two company codes assigned , i am using the same gl for two company codes as cost element , when i am positng the miro for vendor purpose it posted the error , to avoid the price difference purpose , i have given one cost center of first company code in OKB9 , and overcome the error , entries posted, when i am posting new entry for MIRO   in secod company codes with same cost element , price difference of that account should go to the other cost center which specifically created for second company code, in the OBK9 i have given cost center first company code   of the same GL account , now this is another new entry in the second company code with other cost center in the second company code since the price difference account should sit in the other cost center of second company code, how to over come this problem, pls help me
Thanks and regards
Murugesan

Hi,
First, remove the default cost center in the cost element. Then, for the system to derive the correct cost center for each company codes, define one cost center for each compny codes in OKB9 just like this:
Co Code   Cost Element   Cost Center
1000          1000000              A
2000          1000000              B
So during MIRO, the system will derive these values you maintain in OKB9.
Regards,

Is there a way to burn old cd's with new cd's and get the same volume/quality on playback?

is there a way to burn old cd's with new cd's and get the same volume/quality on playback?

RIP the CD as AIFF or WAV.
Create a playlist then burn an audio CD.

TS1424 i bought a book and itunes charged me three times for the same book, how do i submit a claim to get the money back and where do i find then form

i bought a book and itunes charged me three times for the same book, how do i submit a claim to get the money back and where do i find then form

Welcome to the Apple community.
Select the content which is causing a problem and use the 'Report a problem' button in Your Purchase History.

UWL - System doesnt support multiple tasks assignment for the same assignee

Hi all,
we have some tasks coming from our back- end system. When a certain task needs to be substituted to a colleague, no problem ... for one task. When we wish to assign him a second task, we get following message :
<i>System does not support multiple tasks assignment for the same assignee</i>
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/0b/1fc20097b74c41b38621ec2a9454bb/frameset.htm">help.sap.com - substitution</a> :
<i> System does not support multiple tasks assignment for the same assignee
For example: User can only assign one task to an assignee at a time in workflow.
Collaboration Task does not support other tasks at all.</i>
Is substitution only limited to one task per person? What would be a workaround? It's possible to create for each combination of tasks a definition in the back- end which is available from the substition drop down list, but this is not what our customer would like to see.
Many thanks,
Kevin

Hi Boris,
we're using the WebflowConnector.
Thanks,
Kevin

Sales Deal with two different validation dates for the same material

Hi SAPers,
I am trying to create a u201CSales Dealu201D VB31, for the same material/condition, but with two different validation dates. After the creation of the first record, I select u201CNew conditionu201D button, but the system give me the message VK104, u201Cthe condition is being processed in the current session.u201D.
How can I solve this issue?
Thanks in advance.
Pedro

We can't have multiple records for the same condition and key values valid on the same date. The condition end date is part of the primary key in the database table. The date ranges between the records cannot overlap. When you create a new record, usually the end date is set to 12/31/9999 by default. If you need to have this deal to end on a different date and a new deal to start afterwards, then first you need to change 12/31/9999 to a different date.
Also usually I try to exit the screen between the transactions.

Since the price for mac book pro is much expensive than others for the same configuration, give me some reasons that why choose mac book pro?

I like Apple for both iPhone and iPad and I consider to buy a Mac book Pro recently. However, I haven't used mac book before. I have a alienware which is pretty good and I am much comfortable with it. I compared 2 laptops and I found for the same price, the configuration of alienware is much better than Mac book Pro.So why I need to buy the Mac book pro for a higher price? Don't tell me because it is Apple, tell me some details! For those of you who are familiar with mac book pro and loved apple deeply, please convince me!

I guess that really depends on what you would use it for, and how you use a computer. Alienware is geared for gaming and intense graphics displays, but a MBP is designed for general to hardcore users, and in my opinion, for multimedia purposes. One positive thing about Apple is that it works well with Apple hardware and software, and that it is user-friendly. Sony is like this too, that it works well with with Sony products, but my experience with Sony is not as user-friendly.
For me, if I were into Windows based gaming I would go with Alienware. If I wanted and used Windows based software and wanted a quality and long-lasting laptop, I would get a Sony. (There was a study on laptops in 2010, founded that Sony laptops outlasted the other brands (HP and Acer were at the bottom).)
Apple is more well-rounded and functions smoother compare to PCs. So, no pun intended, it's all apples and oranges.
If you are deciding which OS, you should based your decision on your needs, wants and functionality, and maybe long-term budget.
So for example, I'm not a computer gaming (that's what console gaming is for me). I like to compose music with my guitar and keyboard, like editing home videos, I'm an newsletter editor for my non-profit and HOA, I do statistics, I surf the web and stream media, and I do photography as a hobby. So for initial cost, ease of operations, quality, longevity, and total long-term cost, the MBP was my choice. I had considered Dell, Sony and Alienware. To me, Sony and Alienware was like buying a Cadillac, and Dell like a Buick. So I decided on a Lincoln. Apple best fit my lifestyle and long-term budgeting for computers.
FYI...Why I suggest long-term budgeting? Is because over the last decade, I've been through three desktops and four laptops. The Sony laptop outlasted them all with seven years, with only one hardware problem (two if you count the end). The worst ones are tied between HP and Compaq. Over the years my friends with Macs averaged seven to eight years of usage, so I estimated, I could have spent about the same or less by about $2,000 by buying two Macs: depending on configuration and models.
So there's my personal experience and opinion, of course. I currently have a Linux (for testing), Windows (wife uses it for gaming), and MBP at home.

Opening new window or tab to the same site being viewed on another tab/wind

I am a new MacBook user. In my past experience with Internet Explorer, I would often open a new window to the same site that I was already viewing through File>Open New Window. This method was often preferable to opening a new window through the IE icon and loading to the homepage. I have gotten quite used to this pattern and am trying to figure out if there is a way to open a new tab or window to the same page that I am already viewing. I know how to open a new tab or window, but rather than going to the same page as in IE, the new tab is blank and the new window goes to the home page. I am using Safari and Firefox and can't figure out how to do this in either browser.

Hi,
Try this, I think it works for both Safari and Firefox (not 100% sure on Firefox but think so...)
Press command+l (lowercase L) and then press commandoptionpress return. That will open a new window with the current webpage in the new window. To open a new tab with the same details, omit the option key in the second step.
Command key = one with the Apple symbol
Option key may be called Alt on your keyboard.
Hope that works!

MAM Order - Two items having Booking Units with Different Company Code

MAM order created with 2 Line Items
Booking Unit in each Line Item belongs to different Company Code .( Internal Order within each Booking Unit has different Co. Code )
After billing individual Line Items ,Two separate Billing doc. will be created for this Order
Each Billing document should be posted to different Co. Code depending upon Co. Code in Internal Order of respective Booking Unit
TS - 9350801900

Dear Chandramohan ,
Thanks for the reply .
But the solution given by you will just change the message class .I wanted to post Two different Line Items within a single MAM Order to different Co Codes after billing .
Scenario is that SOrg1 assigned to CCode1 & SOrg2 assigned to CCode2 .
       Booking Unit BU1 has Internal Order belonging to CCode1 & BU2 has Internal Order belonging to CCode2
Now MAM Order1 created with SOrg1 having Two Line Items with BU1 & BU2
                After Billing ,Two Billing Docs will be created for each Line Item .
                 Both Billing Doc will be posted to CCode1
Now MAM Order2 created with SOrg2 having Two Line Items with BU1 & BU2
                After Billing ,Two Billing Docs will be created for each Line Item .
                 Both Billing Doc will be posted to CCode2
Means even if Two Line Items are created within a single MAM Order having BU of different Co Codes ,after billing both Billing Docs will be posted to Co Code of Sales Org at Header level .
As per the requirement ,irrespective of header Sales org , Line Items needs to be posted to respective Co Code of Booking Units .
Tds ,
TS

Iphone 4s being replaced with new 4s, will everything sync the same to the new one???

My iphone 4s was having some glitches so i am replacing it. But i really love my layout and how i have my apps organized, i was wondering if i back this all up to itunes if it will sync the exact same back to my new 4s. i get very OCD about my apps and it takes me a long time to get my iphone to look "like home" so this is very important. please get back to me thanks.

Restoring from the latest backup will bring back all your settings again. You might have to fill in certain passwords, for example for mail.
Details about the content of a backup can be found here:
iTunes: About iOS backups

Firefox 5 getting untrusted connection message.......no problems with ie8 or chrome getting to the same site

Firefox 5 is giving the message "This Connection is Untrusted" when attempting to go to a secure site. I'm able to get to the same site when using IE8 or Chrome.

The site doesn't send a required intermediate certificate (VeriSign Class 3 Extended Validation SSL CA)
*http://www.networking4all.com/en/support/tools/site+check/
You can copy and paste the red certificate text to a .cer file and import that file in Firefox.
*Tools > Options > Advanced : Encryption: Certificates - View Certificates

Project stock exist in a plant and WBS but with different company code

Hello,
As I know I can not create a PO in company A, but was assigned to a WBS maintained in company code B. The system will check if the WBS getting the same company code with the PO, and pop up the error message if the company code was differect.
But seems the project stock could exists in a plant but assign to WBS was maintained with different company code. For example, A material stock was in plant A assigned to company code A, and it is also assigned to WBS belong to company code B.
Any one know it is correct?
Thanks!

I knew crossing company code to assign WBS element to PO is not allowed since i got the error message, and I think it's reasonable, cause the expense from the project PO should post to the same company code through the WBS element.
But why for the inventory crossing company code is allowed? The stock in plant A belong to company code A, was assigned to WBS element B belong to company code B. That means the inventory is in the GL balance of company A but under the profit center belong to company B. How to understand it? I think it's wrong

New company integration - Should or not create a new company code?

Hi Gurus,
my customer is acquiring a new company and the related population will be integrated in our sap payroll system.
The FI team is now asking for the creation of a new company code (the new population should be maintained separated from the old one, with a different PMO and budject) but the HR Department does not want to manage (for several internal reasons) a new company code.
Now the question is: is it absolutely necessary to create a new company code or is it possible to manage this situation in another way (maybe linking the new population to a new personnel area, related to an already existing company code)? And what about the posting?
From the payroll point of view, the new population should be managed exactly as the old population. It is just a question to maintain them separated from the FI point of view.
Do you already faced a problem like this? And which is your feedback?
Thanks and Regards,
Gaetano

Creation of new company code is depending on the legal reason...if you legal department and Finance users decide that this new company is a separate legal entity and Profit & Loss will reported separate, Tax Id number is different from parent company, then all this means that this newly acquired company will need a new company code in SAP. Then comes how they want to do the costing...that may also require them to report all the salary cost to this new company code.
Whether it is a new company code or old company code...you would required to identify these new entity as Personnel area or personnel subarea right?
If the Tax id number is different, then it is best recommended to create a separate enterprise structure and bring the employee under the new CC/PA/PSA.
If the tax id is same, only for costing and PnL , then you can use the existing Enterprise structure and override the costing logic using the Substitute cost center or overriding BAdI in HR-FI posting.
Let me know your feedback

Deactivating 2 company codes and transferring balances to new company code

Hi Gurus,
We have few company codes created out them 2 company codes closing due to client req, So we have so many transaction in those two company codes, scenario is to transfer all balances to new company codes.
Please help me to how to proceed what is the right way of doing.
Thanks,
Sree

You can use the transaction F-04 to transfer the balance from one company code to another..
You can use LSMW for the t-code F-04 - Post with Clearing.
On the selection screen you have to give the new company code and at the time of choosing line item you have to give old company code..
After the all balances transferred, you can block the old company code..

How to prevent settlements from AE to wbs with different company code

Hi gurus,
i'm currently facing a problem regarding settlements from activity elements to wbs above.
we have one controllign areas with various company codes.
For some projects, we have wbs assigned to company code A and activity elements assigned to Company A and B.
We have an automatic settlement rule generation so that we settle all activity element costs to wbs. But, for activity elements assigned to company B, we don't want to settle the costs, we want to go through a sd/mm invoicing between the two companies.
How can we prevent the settlement to take place, apart from manually removing the settlement rule for each activity element?
can we put a validation rule that check that whenever the company code in the wbs is different from the one in the activity element, then the settlement doesn't take place? or remove the automatic settlement rule generation and use cjb1 to generate settlement rules only when an activity element as the same company code as the wbs above. would it be possible?
would the WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE BADI or badi proj be of any help?
Any help is welcome.
regards
tim
Edited by: Tim Ursulet on Jan 22, 2009 5:29 PM

Hi Tim,
The transaction CJB1 or CJB2 creates the settlment rules for WBS only, therefore the transactions and Badi WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE BADI are NOT relevant for the settlement rules of activity and elements at all.
For the settlement rules of activity (and elements) the default rule is inserted, as soon as the user navigate to the settlemenent rule overview screen, if the activity do not have the settlement rule at that time. I am not sure, if there is BaDi or substituation to prevent the system apply this default rule in certain case. Other alternative is to specify the objects during settlement, e.g. using selection variant with the company code.
Kind regards,
Zhenbo

Update book inventory with NEW company code assignment for the same site

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for