Upgrade path

we are upgrading from ACS 2.6 to 4.1
should we order the upgrade software (CSACS-4.1-WINUP-K9) or should we order the regular package (CSACS-4.1-WIN-K9)since 2.6 is so out of date?

Hi Martin,
I agree with Scott (no surprise!) One of my co-workers just went down the upgrade path (albeit from a more recent version) and it was very messy. I'm pretty sure he finally just ditched the whole plan and started fresh.
Hope this helps!
Rob

Similar Messages

  • Upgrade from SCCM 2012 SP1 CU4 to R2 Fails - Unsupported Upgrade Path

    Hi everybody,
    I'm currently upgrading our SCCM infrastructure to SCCM 2012 R2 after have finished with the upgrade from SCCM 2012 RTM to SP1 CU4, thus far everything works fine, but when I try to update any
    of the site servers, whether CAS or Primary, I'm getting the following error message in the Prerequisites Check:
    I've gone through the system requirements and prerequisites over and over again and I can assure you that every possible update, supported OS, feature set, SQL Server, check list, etc,
    etc, have been followed as per the official documentation available, however I'm stuck in this point, and surely enough I haven't been able to find out a similar case.Additionally I'm adding
    the ConfigMgrPrereq log (the relevant portion of it) in case someone could kindly take a look at it.
    <04-25-2014 02:06:46> ******* Start Prerequisite checking. *******
    <04-25-2014 02:06:47> ********************************************
    <04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFO: Detected current installed build version [7711] for sitecode [BRA]. For Upgrade,
    minimum supported installed build version is [7804].
    <04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;   
    Unsupported upgrade path;    Error;   
    Configuration Manager has detected that one or more sites in the hierarchy are installed with a version of Configuration Manager that is not supported for upgrade.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFO: This rule only apply to primary site, skip checking.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;   
    Active Replica MP;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFO: This rule only applies to primary or secondary site in hierarchy, skip checking.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;   
    Parent site replication status;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:00> <<<RuleCategory: Database Upgrade Requirements>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:00> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking the target ConfigMgr database is ready to upgrade...>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:00> ===== INFO: Prerequisite Type & Server: SQL:INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int
    =====
    <04-25-2014 02:07:00> <<<RuleCategory: Access Permissions>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:00> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking access permissions...>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;   
    SQL Server sysadmin rights;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;    SQL Server sysadmin rights
    for reference site;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:00> INFO: CheckLocalSys is Admin of <INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int>.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;   
    Site server computer account administrative rights;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;   
    SQL Server security mode;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<RuleCategory: System Requirements>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking system requirements for ConfigMgr...>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: OS version:601, ServicePack:1.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Target computer is a Windows server.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;   
    Unsupported site server operating system version for Setup;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;   
    Domain membership;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;   
    Pending system restart;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<RuleCategory: Dependent Components>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking dependent components for ConfigMgr...>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Return code:0, Major:10, Minor:50, BuildNum:4000
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;   
    SQL Server version;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Get Sql edition:Enterprise Edition.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;   
    SQL Server Edition;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Checking Tcp is enabled to Static port, SQL Server:INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int,
    Instance:.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;   
    SQL Server Tcp Port;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Checking if SQL Server memory is limited.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: SQL Server memory is limited.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;   
    Configuration for SQL Server memory usage;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Checking if SQL Server memory is configured to reserve minimum memory.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Installing the central administration site or primary site, requires SQL
    Server to reserve a minimum of 8 gigabytes (GB) of memory.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> WARN: SQL Server minimum memory is 8000 MB.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;    SQL Server process memory allocation;   
    Warning;    Configuration Manager requires SQL Server to reserve a minimum of 8 gigabytes (GB) of memory for the central administration site and primary site and a minimum of 4 gigabytes (GB) for the secondary site. This memory is reserved by
    using the Minimum server memory setting under Server Memory Options and is configured by using SQL Server Management Studio. For more information about how to set a fixed amount of memory, see
    http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/p/?LinkId=233759.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;   
    Case-insensitive collation on SQL Server;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Check Machine FQDN: <INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int>.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: getaddrinfo returned success.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;   
    Validate FQDN of SQL Server Computer;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO:CheckSupportedFQDNFormat <INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: NetBIOS <INFPROSCCMCDB>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFPROSCCMCDB.usersad.everis.int;   
    Primary FQDN;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<RuleCategory: Site Upgrade Requirements>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking if the target ConfigMgr site is ready to upgrade...>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<RuleCategory: Database Upgrade Requirements>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking the target ConfigMgr database is ready to upgrade...>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> ===== INFO: Prerequisite Type & Server: SDK:INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int
    =====
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<RuleCategory: Access Permissions>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking access permissions...>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: The rule 'Administrative rights on site system' has been run on server 'INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int',
    skipped.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<RuleCategory: System Requirements>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking system requirements for ConfigMgr...>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: The rule 'Unsupported site server operating system version for Setup' has
    been run on server 'INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int', skipped.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: The rule 'Domain membership' has been run on server 'INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int',
    skipped.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:09> INFO: Windows Cluster not found on INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;   
    Windows Failover Cluster;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFO: The rule 'Pending system restart' has been run on server 'INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int',
    skipped.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:10> <<<RuleCategory: Dependent Components>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:10> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking dependent components for ConfigMgr...>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;   
    Windows Deployment Tools installed;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFO: CheckAdkWinPeInstalled on INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int.
    <04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;    Windows Preinstallation Environment
    installed;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int;   
    SMS Provider machine has same domain as site server;    Passed
    <04-25-2014 02:07:10> <<<RuleCategory: Site Upgrade Requirements>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:10> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking if the target ConfigMgr site is ready to upgrade...>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:10> <<<RuleCategory: Database Upgrade Requirements>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:10> <<<CategoryDesc: Checking the target ConfigMgr database is ready to upgrade...>>>
    <04-25-2014 02:07:10> ***************************************************
    <04-25-2014 02:07:10> ******* Prerequisite checking is completed. *******
    <04-25-2014 02:07:10> ******************************************<04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFO: Updating
    Prerequisite checking result into the registry
    <04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFO: Connecting to INFPROSCCMCMS.usersad.everis.int registry
    <04-25-2014 02:07:10> INFO: Setting registry values
    If you wonder whether it might be related to this error:
    -2014 02:07:00> INFO: Detected current installed build version [7711] for sitecode [BRA]. For Upgrade, minimum supported installed build version is [7804].
    I confirm that this one site is a secondary one that's attached to a primary site and this log is from the CAS server, I managed to tall it and delete it from that site, but still appears listed
    on the CAS management console, any idea how to force the removal of a secondary site that's attached to a primary from the CAS site when it has been removed already from said primary?
    I've already tried the
    Preinst /DELSITE XXX  command but it only works when the site to remove it's attached to the local site and certainly not from a CAS
    Finally,  the version, build number and everything is correct, no idea what could be the problem, does anybody know a way to bypass this or force the re-evaluation of this rules, I've got
    the impression that it's being cached somehow.
    Any help would be highly appreciated,
    Thank you.
    Marcelo Estrada MCP-MCTS-MCITP-MCSA-MCSE

    Hello again everybody,
    I've finally managed to fix this up, in the end I had to delete those entries manually from the database as Garry suggested. After this was done the upgrade has gone through as expected with no further ado and has finalized already, now moving on to the
    primary sites.
    If anybody out there is facing the same issue, what I did was to delete those "stubborn" records executing the following statements over the CAS database:
    DELETE
    FROMServerDataWHERESiteCode='XXX'
    DELETE
    FROMSC_SiteDefinitionWHERESiteCode='XXX'
    And this is pretty much about it. I'd recommend to take a proper backup first though as best practice.
    Thank you all anyways for your answers and comments,
    Marcelo Estrada MCP-MCTS-MCITP-MCSA-MCSE

  • Error Message: "This upgrade path is not supported"

    Scenario
    During the process of upgrade to Windows 10 Technical Preview, we may encounter the error “This upgrade path is not supported. Please close Setup and re-launch from the root of the media or go back and pick a different installation
    choice.” in the Compatibility report.
    Analysis
    Step 1: Perform the scenario 1: the upgrade installation fails.
    Reproduce this error following the steps below:
    Download the Windows 10 Technical Preview ISO installation file.
    Extract the ISO installation file to C:\New folder, and now the location of the installation file is
    C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\.
    Click setup.exe from the installation file, and then click
    Install now.   
    Setup is starting, and then get two options Upgrade and
    Custom which is the classic setup wizard which we can see during booting from DVD.
    Click Upgrade to run upgrade installation, however, the error occurs.
    It seems that it is impossible to perform upgrade installation to Windows 10 Technical Preview, although it is fine to click
    Custom to perform clean installation which cannot keep the personal setting and applications.
    However, what we want is upgrade installation, not clean installation.
    Step 2: Perform the scenario 2: the upgrade installation works fine.
    If extract the ISO installation to C:\New in the above step2, click the
    setup.exe from the installation file C:\New\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\, the upgrade installation would work fine, which is as shown the following two figures:
    Step 3: Check the setupact.log
    file which contains information about setup actions during the installation of the two scenarios.
    Scenario 1: Check the setupact.log file of the scenario 1. The detailed information is shown as below:
    2014-10-14 19:03:40, Info UI Determining whether we should run ConX or legacy setup
    2014-10-14 19:03:42, Info UI Will launch ConX setup experience
    2014-10-14 19:03:42, Info UI Launching ConX setup experience
    2014-10-14 19:03:42, Info UI Launching C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\SetupPrep.exe
    2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI Unknown command line for ConX setup experience. Launching legacy setup experience.
    2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI Determining if we are in WDS/Unattend mode
    2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI No need to hide autorun
    2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info [0x0a000a] UI Autorun:Autorun core successfully initialized!!!
    2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info [0x0a000b] UI Autorun:Autorun UI successfully initialized!!!
    2014-10-14 19:03:44, Info UI AppWindow has layout style 0
    2014-10-14 19:03:45, Info UI NavWindow has layout style 0
    2014-10-14 19:03:45, Info [0x0a011c] UI WizardDialogPost::SetActive
    2014-10-14 19:04:57, Info [0x0a018e] UI Passing command line parameter ("C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\setup.exe /HideWelcome /uilanguage:en-US /targetlanguage:en-US") to IBS.
    Scenario 2: Check the setupact.log file of the scenario 2. The detailed information is shown as below:
    2014-10-14 19:08:04, Info UI Determining whether we should run ConX or legacy setup
    2014-10-14 19:08:05, Info UI Will launch ConX setup experience
    2014-10-14 19:08:05, Info UI Launching ConX setup experience
    2014-10-14 19:08:05, Info UI Launching C:\New\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\SetupPrep.exe
    According to the two logs, we can get the following points:
    In scenario 1, it would invoke the SetupPrep.exe in the source folder directly to perform an installation preparation. However, it failed to recognize the path
    C:\New folder\9841.0.140912-1613.FBL_RELEASE_CLIENTENTERPRISE_VOL_X64FRE_EN-US\Sources\SetupPrep.exe. Then it would launch legacy setup.
    In the scenario 2, Windows setup would be redirected to the ConX setup to perform upgrade installation automatically.
    So, what is the difference of the scenario 1 and 2 to bring the different results of upgrade installation?
    Workaround
    Based on lots of testing, we find that if there is no space in the extracting location of the ISO installation
    file, the upgrade installation would work fine.
    What’s more, we can get the meaning of the two setup models in the setupact.log:
    Legacy setup: it is same with setup from DVD boot.
    ConX setup: it would check the compatibility and language UI for upgrade preparation, then perform migration and upgrade directly.
    Additional Resource
    From the release of Windows 10 Technical Preview, many users have installed and tested Windows 10 Technical Preview, we still hope more and more users would download and install Windows 10 Technical Preview for test, and provide
    us your feedback.
    Download Windows Technical Preview
    http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/preview-iso
    Download Windows Technical Preview for Enterprise
    http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/evaluate-windows-technical-preview-for-enterprise
    Please click to vote if the post helps you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

    Hello,
    I would guess that existence of a space in the folder name is what the issue is.  Try removing the space from the folder name and see if works. New_Folder for example
    Thanks, Darrell Gorter [MSFT] This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

  • I am trying to upgrade EPM 8.9(8.49.23) to EPM 9.1 (8.53.08). During dataconversion step the AE process finished succssfully in few seconds. When i see the log it says "There are no conversions to run for upgrade path PF89 (18028,10003)". Please let me kn

    I am trying to upgrade EPM 8.9(8.49.23) to EPM 9.1 (8.53.08). During dataconversion step the AE process finished succssfully in few seconds. When i see the log it says "There are no conversions to run for upgrade path PF89 (18028,10003)". Please let me know why it didnt do any conversion. Am i missing something?

    yes, that app engine didnt inserted any rows. So now when i tried to drill down i found that there was no data in the "new demo" database on table UPG_DATACONV. That is the reason for all this.
    When i applied required for upgrade patch in demo it said couple of patch already exists so those update i skipped. Now when i check upd877654 has a step which imports the data in this table. my change assistant told that the update is already available in my demo so i skipped. Now i am not sure what to do.
    I tried reimporting the data and running the analyzer again. But worried that there can be any issues due to this.

  • Windows 8.1, Update 1 upgrade path

    Hi, if there is anyone of any influence who might read this, please, please, for you own sakes make an upgrade path directly from Windows 8.0 --> Windows 8.1, Update 1
    I cannot upgrade from W8.0 --> 8.1. 
    I cannot upgrade due the the following error.  But I believe it is a silly error and can be overcome as some have managed:
    https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20131018074442AAswJqp 
    http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows8_1-windows_install/windows-81-install-unable-to-create-ramdisk/887b5adc-86ce-4c37-9c58-72eca5f712d4?page=8&tm=1396807793681
    I even had a MS 3rd line Andswer Desk (ref:1233447567.) guy who was remote controlling my machine trying clean boot give up after saying that if my
    MB manufacturer wont support drivers past Vista then there is nothing they "should" do... But Vista is EoS but not extended support as XP is, that ends 2017:
    http://windows.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/lifecycle
    This is an issue I'm having with my personal PC but I also work in IT infrastructure and I think this needs to be sorted. This is going to become a BIG issue for many other people who have Vista/XP-grade systems with the requirements for 8.1.1 who will try
    to upgrade.
    Please can someone help?
    System: Q6600, MB: XFX Nvidia Nforce 680i LT, 8GB RAM

    Hi,
    Windows 8.1 do have have higher requirements for hardware, If your computer hardeware device was too old, you may encounter some problem during install or using Windows 8.1.
    Roger Lu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Upgrade Path from 5.1.4

    We are currently running version 5.1.4 and are looking to upgrade.  What is the recommended upgrade path or version we should be planning to go to?  Our pipeline isn't very complicated since I've read some articles about there not being a direct migration to version 3.0.  We currently develop using the RAD toolkit and .NET if that is a factor when upgrading.
    Also if someone could clarify which packages I'm looking at migrating to as before I installed Endeca IAP and Dev Studio and I was up and running.  I don't see those packages in the newer versions of the software and I'm not 100% on what the packages were renamed to after the transition to Oracle.

    It sounds like you are upgrading an Endeca Commerce / Guided Search implementation.  This forum is for Oracle Endeca Information Discovery (EID) products.  You will get better answers over on the other forum, https://forums.oracle.com/community/developer/english/endeca_experience_management/technical_questions .

  • Merom / Conroe upgrade path for Intel iMac?

    Has anything been released about a processor upgrade path (if possible) to take the Early 2006 IiMacs from the Yonah CPU family to Merom or Conroe?
    I'm still steamed to be stuck with a 32-bit CPU (even though it is a good one, funny how that fact is still judiciously left out of all promotional materials) and wondered if I will be left high and dry in 2-3 months when the 64-bit Core 2 Duo chips ship.
    It would be nice if there were an upgrade path to bring the early adopter faithful into the 64-bit realm. Anyone heard a mighty rumblin' ?

    People have successfully removed the CPU and replaced it. And, the new chips are supposed to be compatible with any Yonah based system.
    So, while there is no official upgrade path, it should not be a problem installing a new CPU in the machine later.
    Obviously, the heat of the new chips will be a consideration. They may be hotter, they may not be.
    And, it will obviously void your warranty.
    But, it should be possible.

  • Usually there is a upgrade path for current users of the software at a reduced price. I dont see anything like that for Lightroom 6. Will I have to pay full price just to upgrade to the new LR6 standalone version???

    Usually there is a upgrade path for current users of the software at a reduced price. I dont see anything like that for Lightroom 6. Will I have to pay full price just to upgrade to the new LR6 standalone version???

    The standalone upgrade is 79 US Dollars.
    Go to Products, select Lightroom 6, click on Buy, select Upgrade instead of Full

  • HT1444 The update vs. upgrade paths are very confusing. I'm running OS X v10.5.8. What upgrade products do I need in order to become current?

    The update vs. upgrade paths are very confusing. I'm running OS X v10.5.8 and trying to figure out what versions I need to purchase/download in order to become current.
    Thank you!

    Phone the Apple Store, order a Mac OS X 10.6 DVD, and run Software Update. If your Mac supports it, buy 10.7 or 10.8 from the Mac App Store.
    (70024)

  • Hi, I currently have Lightroom 5.6 for MAC and Adobe has launched Lightroom 6 - I am trying to understand if there is an upgrade path for 5.6 users and how much does it cost, if any or is a forklift upgrade i.e. new software all together.  Thanks

    Hi, I am a Lightroom user and currently have 5.6 version (DVD Version).  The lightroom 6 version, for existing lightrrom users, is there an upgrade path or it is a new software entirely.  In either cases, what costs are associated.
    Thanks,
    Raj

    LR 6 is a new payfor upgrade, $80 in the US if you have the serial-number-licensed LR 5.  If you're already using the CC version of LR+PS then it just comes along as a new app you can install.
    It’ll run alongside your LR5 so you can try it out and see if it’s something you want.
    The only trial is a LR-6-CC version that you can convert to a serial-number-licensed version if you buy a serial-number.  I think the download in LR 5 when it notifies you of an upgrade is what you can use to try it, although I don’t have personal experience with that seeing as I have the CC version of LR+PS so the CC App provided the Install button for me.
    The main issues people are having are for some system configurations performance is worse.  Adobe rewrote it to use the GPU in the Develop module but some people’s video cards aren’t up  to the task, and for some people even turning off the GPU, while speeding things up, doesn’t make it as fast as LR 5.
    On my system it seems to work great.

  • Upgrade Path 8.1.6 to 8.1.7.4

    Hi,
    I have to upgrade Oracle 8.1.6 to Oracle 8.1.7.4. In the Oracle8i Migration Release 3 (8.1.7) PDF documentation, I don't find a upgrade path. So I think I can directly uprade to 8.1.7.4. But somebody told me that I have first upgrade to 8.1.7.0?
    Is there anybody with experince in this topic and can help me?
    Oliver

    You have to first upgrade from 8.1.6 to 8.1.7.0 and then apply the 8.1.7.4 patch. 8.1.7.4 is not the full blown database software, it's an upgrade.
    The readme for 8.1.7.4 states:
    This is not a complete software distribution and you must install it over an existing 8.1.7 Oracle Server installation.

  • Is there an upgrade path from Final Cut Studio 3.0 to Final Cut Pro X?

    Is there an upgrade path from Final Cut Studio 3.0 to Final Cut Pro X ?

    The price of FCPX pretty much is the cost of the upgrade of FCPStudio, but a much better value (at least so far -- every update has been free.) However, it's only the single app so you might feel like you're not getting as much for your money. Don't be fooled. Most of Color and Soundtrack Pro are built into FCPX. FCPX will conform video automatically so Cinema Tools aren't really needed anymore. The Motion engine is part of FCPX, although I do recommend buying Motion 5 (an extra 50 bucks.)  (Motion 4 seems to have died in Yosemite - you can't even launch it.)
    I "upgraded" from Final Cut Studio 3... it took me about a week to decide to pack up all the old software for good. YMMV.  However, if you use DVD Studio Pro... hang on to that.

  • Nexus 7010 upgrade path

    We currently have two Nexus 7010 with 5.0(2a) as system images.
    We would need to know the correct upgrade path to 6.1(1). On the release notes it reads the path is from 4.2(8), 5.0(5) or 5.1(6) to 5.2(5) then to 6.1(1).
    Also if ISSU is possible or, because we may need to upgrade EPLD, if there is no upgrade path to do a non-disruptive upgrade.

    You probably need to dig a little deeper to get a definitive answer (sup1 or 2, type of cards, etc..) but here is a diagram in the release notes for 6.1 found here:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/sw/6_x/nx-os/release/notes/61_nx-os_release_note.html
    If this posts answers your question or is helpful, please consider rating it and/or marking as answered.

  • Upgrade path from CCP 9.3R2 to 9.3.2

    Hi Team,
    Can someone help on the process involved in upgrading a CCP9.3 R2 environment to 9.3.2.
    Is the upgrade faily straight forward or do we have to do some customizations to make this happen??
    I have a CCP 9.3R2 and CPO 2.2 in a DEV system, have lot of custom content in this environment.
    I am upgrading CPO 2.2 to CPO 2.3 engine but not importing the content because I have custom content built on 2.2.
    I am liking to know the process doing an upgrade for CCP
    - is the inplace upgrade of CCP 9.3R2 to 9.3.2 valid???
    OR
    - building new CCP 9.3.2 and export / import content from 9.3 R2 to 9.3.2 valid??
    Thanks
    Satish

    CCP upgrade should be straight forward. Refer to the CCP doc for upgrade paths and instructions. You would have to test the content you built in 9.3 R2 as I do not know all the inner parts difference in the two versions.

  • Upgrade path from ODI 10.1.3.5

    Hello Friends,
    We are using ODI 10.1.3.5. Like to get some recommendations on upgrade path from 10.1.3.5.
    I read that we need to first upgrade to 10.1.3.6.x before considering upgrade to 11G release.
    I guess, this might be in consideration to upgrade with minimal change with patch upgrade to 10.1.3.6.x than upgrading to big change 11G release.
    If we have to upgrade to one safe step with not of a big impact/change to users and projects...what release upgrade-to is ideal? 10.1.3.6.x?
    Appreciate your response!! Thanks.

    Thanks for the information. If we have to upgrade to a latest release 11G it looks we can from 10.1.3.5, any suggestions we should consider 11.1.1.5 or 11.1.1.3? Not sure if these release are in sync with target KM's like Essbase & Planning on EPM front we are on 11.1.1.3

Maybe you are looking for